Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaytán, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Criado, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaytán, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Criado, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gaytán, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Criado, J. E.
Biology of Reproduction 66, 232-240 (2002)
© 2002 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Selective Apoptosis of Luteal Endothelial Cells in Dexamethasone-Treated Rats Leads to Ischemic Necrosis of Luteal Tissue1

Francisco Gaytán2,a, Concepción Moralesb, Carmen Bellidoa, and José Eugenio Sánchez-Criadoa

a Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology and b Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Cordoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In infertile cycles in rats, the corpus luteum (CL) ceases producing progesterone in about 2 days and is eliminated by structural luteolysis. Glucocorticoids disrupt the ovarian cycle and interfere with structural luteolysis. We studied the effects of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX) on rat luteolysis. Cycling rats were treated during 3 days (from estrus to diestrus) with different doses (0.025, 0.1, 0.4, and 1 mg/rat) of DEX or vehicle. DEX-treated rats showed a necrotic pattern of cell death, affecting exclusively the last generation of regressing CLs. In these animals, selective apoptosis of luteal endothelial cells, detected by both morphological characteristics and TUNEL assay, was observed on the morning of proestrus and was followed by necrosis of the luteal tissue. These effects were dose related. With the lowest DEX doses (0.025 and 0.1 mg), only some of the animals were affected and showed smaller necrotic areas in CLs. The deleterious effects of DEX on endothelial cells were in keeping with the immunohistochemical localization of glucocorticoid receptors in the endothelial cells of the last CL generation. The results of this study strongly suggest that DEX-induced selective apoptosis of endothelial cells leads to ischemic necrosis of the luteal tissue and raises the possibility that actions on endothelial cells may be underlying glucocorticoid-induced effects on the ovary.

apoptosis, corpus luteum, corticosterone, glucocorticoid receptor, ovary


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The female reproductive system is subjected to extensive tissue remodeling processes during reproductive life. In the ovary, the corpus luteum (CL) is a transitory organ formed from the postovulatory follicle and has a short life span [1], especially in laboratory rodents that display ultrashort (4-day) estrous cycles [2]. In the rat, the newly formed CLs undergo rapid vascularization and luteinization, but if pregnancy does not occur, the cyclic CL ceases producing progesterone about 2 days after formation and should be eliminated by the process of structural luteolysis [1]. Structural luteolysis is triggered by the preovulatory prolactin (PRL) surge during the transition from proestrus to estrus [3, 4]. The first morphological signs of structural luteolysis are the presence of abundant apoptotic luteal cells and the invasion of the CL by abundant macrophages [4]. This apoptotic burst eliminates the greater part of the steroidogenic cells, but several apoptotic bursts are necessary for the complete elimination of the regressing CL [35]. As a consequence, at least 4 regressing CL generations are present in the rat ovary at any stage of the estrous cycle.

Glucocorticoids (GCs) disrupt the ovarian cycle [68]. Pathological conditions such as Cushing's syndrome and physical or psychological stress adversely affect fertility [9]. Moreover, GCs inhibit progesterone secretion [1012], although stimulatory effects have been reported in hypophysectomized rats [13]. Glucocorticoid receptors are expressed in ovarian cells [13, 14], which implies the potential for direct actions of GCs in the ovary. Glucocorticoids have been found to interfere with luteolysis [11, 1517], although the mechanisms of these actions are not fully understood. Aside from their possible central effects on hypothalamic and pituitary hormones [1820], GCs may interfere with structural luteolysis by multiple local mechanisms. Glucocorticoids inhibit prostaglandin synthesis [17, 21], macrophage recruitment and activation [22, 23], and cytokine release [24, 25].

The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX) on structural luteolysis in the cyclic rat.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Treatments

Female cycling rats of the Wistar strain (mean weight 300 g) were used. The animals were maintained under controlled light (14L:10D; lights-on at 0500 h) and temperature (21°C) and had free access to rat chow and tap water. The stage of the cycle was checked daily by examining vaginal smears. Only rats showing at least 2 consecutive 4-day cycles were used. All experiments were carried out in accordance to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Cordoba.

Animals were given daily s.c. injections of 0.025, 0.1, 0.4, or 1 mg/rat DEX in 200 µl of olive oil or vehicle for 3 days (from estrus to diestrus), and 5 animals/group were killed on the morning (1000 h) and the evening (2100 h) of proestrus and on the morning (1000 h) of estrus. DEX doses in this range have been previously found to interfere with luteolysis [17].

Tissue Processing

Right ovaries were dissected and fixed in Bouin-Hollande fluid for 24 h and processed for paraffin embedment. Five-micrometer-thick sections were cut, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and used for morphological evaluation. Left ovaries were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in Sorensen buffer (pH 7.3) for 24 h and processed for paraffin embedment. Four-micrometer-thick sections were cut, placed on poly-L-lysine-coated slides and used for immunohistochemistry.

In Situ TUNEL

Apoptotic cell detection was based in the method described by Gavrieli et al. [26], with an in situ cell death detection kit (POD; Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) according to the instructions of the supplier but with slight modifications. After dewaxing and hydration, endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubation for 30 min in 2% H2O2 in methanol. After washing with PBS, sections were submitted to protease treatment with Proteinase K (5 mg/ml in 20 mM Tris, 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7.2, from 5 to 25 min at 37°C; DAKO Diagnostica). Sections were washed again and treated with TUNEL reaction mixture (containing terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and label solution) for 60 min at 37°C. After washing in PBS, sections were incubated with the anti-label antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (POD). Negative controls were incubated with label solution lacking terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. The 3' end-bound POD was visualized by incubation in 0.03% diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Type IV; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 0.01% H2O2 in 0.1 M Tris buffer (pH 7.6) for 1 min. Sections were darkened in 1% copper sulfate for 5 min and counterstained with hematoxylin, 0.04% (w:v) 3,3'-diaminobenzidine in 0.05 M Tris-HCl (Sigma), pH 8, and 3% H2O2. Positive controls in the same sections were apoptotic cells in atretic follicles.

Immunohistochemical Detection of GC Receptors

Glucocorticoid receptors (GCRs) were detected with the polyclonal antibody GR (M20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). PFA-fixed sections (4 µm thick) were dewaxed and rehydrated. Endogenous peroxidase was inhibited with 2% H2O2 in methanol for 30 min. After being washed in distilled water, these sections were immersed in 10 mM citrate buffer and incubated in a microwave oven (2 x 5 min at 700 W) for antigen retrieval. Sections were allowed to cool at room temperature, washed in PBS, blocked with 10% normal rabbit serum for 2 h, and incubated overnight with the primary antibody (diluted 1:100). Negative controls were incubated with preimmune serum or PBS instead of the primary antibody. Sections were then processed according to the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method, as previously described [4]. PFA-fixed control tissues (heart, spleen, and lung) were fixed, processed, embedded, and prepared for immunohistochemistry in the same way.

Immunohistochemical Detection of Macrophages

Macrophages were detected with the monoclonal antibody ED1, following previously described methods [4]. PFA-fixed sections (4 µm thick) were placed on poly-L-lysine-coated slides. After dewaxing and inhibition of peroxidase with 2% H2O2 in methanol for 30 min, sections were rinsed in PBS, blocked with 10% preimmune serum for 2 h, and incubated overnight with mouse monoclonal ED1 antibody (diluted 1:400). Negative controls were incubated with preimmune serum or PBS instead of the primary antibody. Sections were then processed according to the ABC method, as previously described [4].


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The morphologic changes that happen in the regressing CL of cycling rats during the transition from proestrus to estrus have been described in detail [4, 5]. These changes were coincident with those found in vehicle-treated rats in this study. On the morning of proestrus, tissue structure was well preserved and apoptotic cells were nearly absent (Fig. 1A). On the evening of proestrus and on the morning of estrus, luteal tissue was disorganized and apoptotic luteal cells were very abundant throughout the CL section (Fig. 1B). However, most blood vessels were not damaged, and endothelial cells appeared healthy (Fig. 1B). Apoptotic cells were observed in all generations of regressing CLs. Necrotic areas or inflammatory reactions (apart from the presence of abundant macrophages) were not observed.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. CLs of vehicle-treated rats on the morning of proestrus (A) and the morning of estrus (B). A) Tissue structure is well preserved and apoptotic cells are absent. B) Apoptotic cells (arrows) are abundant, and endothelial cells lining blood vessels (asterisks) appear healthy. Hematoxylin and eosin. x1000

The CLs of DEX-treated rats showed a clearly different pattern of cell death. DEX-induced changes were particularly evident with the higher doses (0.4 and 1 mg). The following description corresponds to these doses; differences with lower doses (0.025 and 0.1 mg) are reported thereafter. On the morning of proestrus, morphological changes were already evident and affected exclusively the last CL generation (corresponding to the CL of the current cycle), whereas regressing CLs of previous cycles did not show morphological changes (Fig. 2A). In CLs of the current cycle, 3 different concentric zones could be distinguished (Fig. 2A): a peripheral zone showing steroidogenic cells with normal features, a midzone in which steroidogenic cells showed nuclear and cytoplasmic swelling (Fig. 2, A and B), and an inner zone in which steroidogenic cells showed slight pyknosis, a punctate chromatin pattern, and some degree of cytoplasmic condensation (Fig. 2, A and C). The most relevant feature at this time was the presence of high numbers of apoptotic cells that showed the characteristic morphological features of this type of cell death [27], i.e., shrunken eosinophilic cytoplasm, chromatin margination, and fragmentation into apoptotic bodies at advanced stages (Fig. 3A), and were specifically stained with the TUNEL assay (Fig. 3, B and C). Apoptotic cells were observed throughout the CL section and lined the blood vessels, although at advanced stages of apoptosis they were detached from the vessel wall and found in the vessel lumen (Fig. 3A). These cells were assumed to correspond to endothelial cells because of their location lining the blood vessel lumen and by the extreme scarcity of healthy endothelial cells in the last CL generation (Figs. 2B and 3, A–C)



View larger version (189K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. CLs of DEX-treated rats (1 mg) on the morning of proestrus. A) Three different concentric zones can be observed in the last generation (1) of regressing CLs: a peripheral zone (pz) of apparently healthy luteal tissue, a midzone (mz) showing cell swelling, and an inner zone (iz) in which cells show slight pyknosis. CLs of the 2 previous generations (2, 3) have normal features. Hematoxylin and eosin. x60. B) Steroidogenic cells (arrows) in the midzone show nuclear and cytoplasmic swelling. C) In the inner zone, steroidogenic cells (long arrows) show slight pyknosis and a punctate chromatin pattern. Apoptotic endothelial cells (short arrows) are present. Hematoxylin and eosin. x1000



View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. CLs of DEX-treated rats (1 mg) on the morning (AC) and the evening (D) of proestrus. A) Most endothelial cells lining blood vessels show the morphological characteristics of apoptosis or are detached in the vessel lumen. Hematoxylin and eosin. x1000. B) These cells are stained with the TUNEL method throughout the CL section. TUNEL with hematoxylin counterstaining. x200. C) Higher magnification of TUNEL-stained apoptotic cells lining blood vessels. TUNEL with hematoxylin counterstaining. x1000. D) The central necrotic area (arrows) is nonspecifically stained with the TUNEL method. TUNEL with hematoxylin counterstaining. x60

On the evening of proestrus, only 2 concentric zones could be distinguished in the last CL generation (Fig. 4A): a peripheral zone of apparently normal tissue (except for the scarcity of endothelial cells lining blood vessels) and a central zone with clear morphological signs of initial necrosis (Fig. 4, A and C). Tissue architecture was disrupted, and steroidogenic cells showed pyknotic nuclei or karyolysis and cytoplasmic condensation (Fig. 4C). Some apoptotic cells were still found in blood vessel remnants. Both nuclei and cytoplasm were nonspecifically stained with the TUNEL method in central necrotic areas (Figs. 3D and 5A). On the morning of estrus, as on the previous day, alterations were found exclusively on the last generation of regressing CL. These CL showed a narrow peripheral zone of apparently healthy steroidogenic cells and a central zone of advanced necrosis, in which nuclei were indistinct and only ghost outlines of luteal cells and blood vessels were present (Fig. 4, B and D). In this zone, macrophages immunostained for ED1 antigen and polymorphonuclear leukocytes were found in low numbers. Newly formed CLs derived from the ovulatory event of the early estrus were present (Fig. 5B). In the previous generations of regressing CLs, apoptotic steroidogenic cells (as observed in vehicle-injected rats from the evening of proestrus) and necrotic areas were not found (Fig. 5B).



View larger version (175K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Last generation of regressing CLs of rats treated with DEX (1 mg) on the evening of proestrus (A and C) and the morning of estrus (B and D). A) A wide central necrotic area (NA) shows cell pyknosis. B) An advanced necrotic area (ANA) is present. Hematoxylin and eosin. x200. C) Necrotic cells (arrows) show pyknosis/karyolysis and dense cytoplasm. D) An area of advanced necrosis, with scarce healthy stromal cells and ghost outlines. Hematoxylin and eosin. x1000



View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Sections of the ovary of DEX-treated rats (1 mg) on the evening of proestrus (A) and on the morning of estrus (B). A) The central necrotic areas (arrows) in the CLs of the last generation (1) are highlighted by nonspecific TUNEL staining. Necrotic areas are absent in CLs of the previous cycle (2). TUNEL staining. x50. B) A newly formed CL (N) is present. The regressing CL of the last generation (one cycle old, 1) shows a central necrotic area (arrowheads), whereas two (2)- or three (3)-cycle-old CLs do not show areas of necrosis. Hematoxylin and eosin. x50

The alterations described above were dose related. A direct dose-related relationship was found for the presence of necrotic areas. With the lower DEX doses (0.025 and 0.1 mg), CL alterations were found in only a percentage of the animals (33% and 60% of rats, respectively). In affected animals, only small areas of the CL section were affected (Fig. 6A). These necrotic zones had a higher cellularity because of the abundance of infiltrating macrophages (Fig. 6B) and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (Fig. 6C). An inverse dose-related relationship was found for the presence of the physiological apoptotic response of steroidogenic cells during the transition from proestrus to estrus. With the lower doses, apoptotic cells were abundant in nonnecrotic areas, similar to the situation in vehicle-treated rats.



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. CLs of DEX-treated rats (0.025 mg) on the morning of estrus. A) A necrotic area (NA) shows abundant healthy stromal cells corresponding to macrophages, when immunostained for ED1 antigen (arrows in B), and to polymorphonuclear leukocytes (arrows in C). A and C, x200; B, x400

Immunolocalization of GCR was performed in intact cycling rats. Clear immunostaining was found exclusively in the endothelial cells of some ovarian compartments. In growing and preovulatory follicles, endothelial cells in the blood vessels of the theca layer showed intense cytoplasmic immunostaining (Fig. 7A) at all stages of the cycle. Blood vessels in the ovarian stroma were negative (Fig. 7A). In the CL, immunostaining showed variable intensity depending on the day of the estrous cycle. At estrus, endothelial cells invading the newly formed CL showed cytoplasmic staining. At metestrus, intense cytoplasmic immunostaining was found in endothelial cells throughout the CL section (Fig. 7B). A progressive decrease in the intensity of the immunostaining was found from metestrus to proestrus (Fig. 7C), and immunostaining was absent on the morning of estrus in the regressing CL of the previous cycle (Fig. 7D). Consequently, regressing CLs from previous cycles were not immunostained. Although slight nuclear immunostaining was observed in different luteal cell types along the cycle, it was difficult to differentiate from background, and these cells were considered negative. In contrast, intense nuclear staining was present in routine control tissues (heart, spleen, and lung). In these tissues, however, endothelial cells of the blood vessels were not immunostained (Fig. 7E).



View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Immunohistochemical localization of GCRs in the ovary of intact cycling rats and in control myocardial tissue (E). In proestrus (A), endothelial cells (arrows) in the blood vessels of the theca of preovulatory follicles are immunostained, whereas blood vessels in the ovarian stroma (asterisk) are not. In CLs, immunostaining of endothelial cells (arrows) is intense at metestrus (B), faint at proestrus (C), and absent in CLs of the previous cycle (D). In the myocardium, muscle cells (arrows) show intense nuclear immunostaining, whereas endothelial cells are negative. A, x400; B, x1000; C and D, x900; E, x200


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, the most relevant feature of the ovary of DEX-treated rats was the presence of a necrotic pattern of cell death affecting the last generation of regressing CLs. The sequence of morphological changes observed from the morning of proestrus onward prompted us to propose the possible pathogenic mechanism leading to necrosis of the luteal tissue. Our hypothesis is that disruption of blood vessels due to selective apoptosis of endothelial cells leads to ischemic necrosis of the CL.

In DEX-treated rats on the morning (1000 h) of proestrus, apoptosis (as detected by both morphological features and staining with the TUNEL assay) affected exclusively the endothelial cells. This apoptosis was coincident with degenerative changes in luteal cells compatible with the initial stages of ischemic necrosis [27]. The subsequent evolution of the luteal tissue, showing clear morphological signs of necrosis on the evening (2100 h) of proestrus and advanced necrosis on the morning (1000 h) of estrus, was in agreement with the well-documented morphological changes characteristic of ischemic necrosis, i.e., progressive changes from cell swelling to piknosis and cytoplasmic eosinophilia leading to disruption of tissue architecture and disappearance of cell nuclei, leaving ghost outlines of cells [27]. Selective apoptosis of endothelial cells seemed to be the cornerstone of the major alterations induced by DEX in the luteal tissue. GCs induce apoptosis in several cell types, including lymphocytes [28], osteoblasts/osteocytes [29], and placental cells [30]. Selective apoptosis of endothelial cells after GC treatment has not been previously reported. However, some data suggest the induction of apoptosis of endothelial cells by GC in other tissues. In in vitro model systems of angiogenesis [31, 32], growing capillaries were destroyed after 4 days of DEX treatment. The endothelial cells "rounded up," which is suggestive of the apoptotic mode of cell death. In contrast, it has been reported that GC can suppress apoptosis in glomerular endothelial cells [33] and testicular germ cells [34], which suggests that GCs differentially regulate apoptosis in different tissues. Apoptosis of endothelial cells has been reported during physiological luteolysis in several species, such as guinea pig [35], cow [36], and human [37]. However, this process is not massive, does not induce necrosis, and does not severely compromise blood supply to the regressing CL, which continues to be a well-vascularized organ throughout regression [38]. These findings are in accordance with the presence of intact blood vessels in the CLs of vehicle-treated rats after the apoptotic burst during the transition from proestrus to estrus. Moreover, the apoptosis of endothelial cells in DEX-treated rats was already present on the morning of proestrus, before the preovulatory PRL surge triggering apoptosis in intact cycling rats, and seemed to be independent of hormonal preovulatory surges.

Necrosis of the luteal tissue affected only the last generation of regressing CLs. The previous generations of CLs, which were also functionally inactive, did not show necrotic areas. This finding is in keeping with the immunohistochemical localization of GCR in the endothelial cells of the last CL generation. In the ovary, intense GCR immunostaining was found in those tissue compartments in which active angiogenesis was occurring, i.e., in the theca layer of growing follicles and in newly formed CLs. In older CLs and in the ovarian stroma, blood vessels that have a low turnover, similar to that in vessels in other anatomical locations [39], did not show GCR immunostaining. Whether newly formed blood vessels in other locations outside the ovary also show GCR immunostaining is not known.

In this study, GCRs were found in the cytoplasm of endothelial cells. In contrast to other intracellular steroid receptors such as those of estrogens and androgens, which seem to be located exclusively in the nucleus, GCR has been reported to be located in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm [4042] in different tissues. In this study, the nuclear location was predominant in extraovarian tissues. Whether the induction of apoptosis of endothelial luteal cells was mediated by classical intracellular GCR is not known. Although most known effects of GC are mediated by the intracellular GCR inducing changes in gene expression (i.e., genomic responses [43]), recent evidence indicates that GCs may also induce nongenomic responses through interaction with specific GCRs in the cell membrane [44]. In this sense, DEX induces lymphoid cell apoptosis though activation of membrane receptors [45].

The effects of GC reported here occurred at pharmacological doses. Glucocorticoid therapy is useful for a number of chronic conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive lung disease, chronic active hepatitis, and inflammatory bowel disease, and is widely used at very high short-term or long-term doses. Some of the side effects of GC treatment involve blood vessel injury. Up to 25% of patients receiving corticosteroid therapy underwent ischemic or avascular necrosis of bone [46]. In this sense, endothelial cell apoptosis deserves attention as a possible explanation for the deleterious effects of GCs, particularly in those cases involving vascular injury.

It is generally assumed that the main deleterious actions of GC in disrupting the ovarian cycle are the result of the inhibition of hypothalamic GnRH output, thus preventing the release of LH and FSH and creating a state of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism [18, 19, 47]. However, in the present study, ovulation, indicated by the presence of newly formed CLs on the morning of estrus, was not blocked even with the higher DEX doses, whereas direct effects on the CL were observed even with the lowest DEX doses. In previous studies, GCs have inhibited progesterone secretion in other experimental models in the rat [10, 12] or in other species [11]. Different mechanisms, including direct effects on the CL [12], have been proposed. The data of this study raise the possibility that vascular damage could be underlying inhibitory effects on the CL and indicate that peripheral actions of GCs should be considered when studying the effects of these drugs on the reproductive system.

The inhibition of the normal luteolytic process in rats treated with the higher doses of DEX was consistent with results of previous studies reporting inhibition of luteolysis in rats treated with immunosuppressive doses of GC [17]. In this study, inhibition of apoptosis of steroidogenic cells was observed only in the nonnecrotic areas of the last CL generation or in CLs of previous generations. The inhibition of apoptosis may be due to multiple mechanisms, such as inhibition of the PRL surge [20], blocking of macrophage infiltration [16], inhibition of macrophage activation or cytokine release [24, 25] or inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis [17, 21]. Dose-related differences were also found for the number of infiltrating macrophages and polymorphonuclear leukocytes. These cells were abundant with the lower DEX doses but were scarce with the higher doses. This scarcity was likely related to the anti-inflammatory actions of GC [23, 48] and has been previously reported after GC treatment in the CLs of different species [16, 17].

The presence of GCR immunoreactivity and the specific induction of apoptosis in the endothelial cells by DEX treatment suggest that luteal blood vessels are a target for GCs in the rat ovary.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors are very grateful to J. Molina, T Recio, and E. Tarradas for their technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
First decision: 10 July 2001.

1 This work has been subsidized by grants 1FD97-1065-CO3-03 and PM98-0167 from the Dirección General de Enseñanza Superior e Investigación Científica, Spain. Back

2 Correspondence. FAX: 57 34 218288; fi1sacrj{at}uco.es Back

Accepted: August 29, 2001.

Received: May 21, 2001.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Niswender GD, Juengel JL, McGuire WJ, Belfiore CJ, Wiltbank MC. Luteal function: the estrous cycle and early pregnancy. Biol Reprod 1994; 50:239-247[Abstract]
  2. Rothchild I. The regulation of the mammalian corpus luteum. Recent Prog Horm Res 1981; 37:183-298
  3. Matsuyama S, Chang KT, Kanuka H, Ohnishi M, Ikeda A, Nishihara M, Takahashi M. Occurrence of the deoxyribonucleic acid-fragmentation during prolactin induced structural luteolysis in cycling rats. Biol Reprod 1996; 54:1245-1251[Abstract]
  4. Gaytán F, Bellido C, Morales C, Sánchez-Criado JE. Both prolactin and progesterone are necessary for the induction of apoptosis in the regressing corpus luteum of the rat. Biol Reprod 1998; 59:1200-1206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gaytán F, Bellido C, Morales C, Sánchez-Criado JE. Luteolytic effect of prolactin is dependent of the degree of differentiation of luteal cells in the rat. Biol Reprod 2001; 65:433-441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. De Greef WJ, van der Schoot P. Effects of dexamethasone on ovarian activity in rats. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1987; 116:350-356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Moberg GP. Influence of the adrenal axis upon the gonads. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol 1987; 9:456-496[Medline]
  8. Viveiros MM, Liptrap RM. ACTH treatment disrupts ovarian IGF-I and steroid hormone production. J Endocrinol 2000; 164:255-264[Abstract]
  9. Brann DW, Mahesh VB. Role of corticosteroids in female reproduction. FASEB J 1991; 5:2691-2698[Abstract]
  10. Kato H, Nanjo K, Numa F, Nakamura Y, Ueda K, Inoguchi H, Torigoe T. Inhibitory effects of adrenocorticotrophin or corticosterone on progesterone secretion during mid-pregnancy in rats. J Reprod Fertil 1988; 83:867-872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Chatterton RT, Kazer RR, Rebar RW. Depletion of luteal phase progesterone during constant infusion of cortisol phosphate in the cynomolgus monkey. Fertil Steril 1991; 56:547-554[Medline]
  12. Sugino N, Tamura H, Nakamura Y, Ueda K, Kato H. Different mechanisms for the inhibition of progesterone secretion by ACTH and corticosterone in pregnant rats. J Endocrinol 1991; 129:405-410[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Towns R, Menon KMJ, Brabec RK, Silverstein AM, Cohen JM, Bowen JM, Keyes PL. Glucocorticoids stimulate the accumulation of lipids in the rat corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:416-421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Schreiber JR, Nakamura K, Erickson GF. Rat ovary glucocorticoid receptor: identification and characterization. Steroids 1982; 39:569-584[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Dobson H, Alam MGS, Kanchev LN. Effect of betamethasone treatment on luteal lifespan and the LH response to GnRH in dairy cows. J Reprod Fertil 1987; 80:25-30[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Seiner SJ, Schramn W, Keyes PL. Effect of treatment with methylprednisolone on duration of pseudopregnancy and on macrophages and T lymphocytes in rabbit corpora lutea. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 96::347-353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wang F, Riley JCM, Behrman HR. Immunosuppressive levels of glucocorticoid block extrauterine luteolysins in the rat. Biol Reprod 1993;; 49:66-73[Abstract]
  18. Li PS. Effect of cortisol or adrenocorticotropic hormone on luteinizing hormone secretion by pig pituitary cells in vitro. Life Sci 1987; 41::2493-2501[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Rosen H, Jameel ML, Barkan AL. Dexamethasone suppresses gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion and had direct pituitary effects in male rats: differential regulation of GnRH receptor and gonadotropin responses to GnRH. Endocrinology 1988; 122:2873-2880[Abstract]
  20. Brann DW, Putnam CD, Mahesh VB. Corticosteroid regulation of prolactin secretion in the rat. Endocrinology 1990; 126:159-166[Abstract]
  21. Flower RJ, Blackwell GJ. Anti-inflammatory steroids induce biosynthesis of a phospholipase A2 inhibitor which prevents prostaglandin generation. Nature 1979; 278:456-459[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Roberts CP, Murphy AA, Santanam N, Parthasarathy S. The effect of RU 486 and related compounds on cultured macrophage differentiation and function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:248-259[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Baybutt HN, Holsboer F. Inhibition of macrophage differentiation and function by cortisol. Endocrinology 1990; 127:476-480[Abstract]
  24. Snyder DS, Unanue ER. Corticosteroids inhibit murine macrophage Ia expression and interleukin 1 production. J Immunol 1982; 129::1803-1805[Abstract]
  25. Telleria CM, Ou J, Sugino N, Ferguson S, Gibori G. The expression of interleukin-6 in the pregnant rat corpus luteum and its regulation by progesterone and glucocorticoid. Endocrinology 1998; 139:3597-3605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA. Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. J Cell Biol 1992; 119:493-501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Majno G, Joris I. Apoptosis, oncosis, and necrosis. An overview of cell death. Am J Pathol 1995; 146:3-15[Abstract]
  28. Compton MM, Cidlowski JA. Thymocyte apoptosis. A model of programmed cell death. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1992; 3:17-23
  29. Weinstein RS, Nicholas RW, Manolagas SC. Apoptosis of osteocytes in glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of the hip. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85:2907-2912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Waddell BJ, Hisheh S, Dharmarajan AM, Burton PJ. Apoptosis in rat placenta is zone-dependent and stimulated by glucocorticoids. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:1913-1917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Nicosia RF, Ottinetti A. Growth of microvessels in serum-free matrix culture of rat aorta. Lab Invest 1990; 63:115-122[Medline]
  32. Jaggers DC, Collins WP, Milligan SR. Potent inhibitory effects of steroids in an in vitro model of angiogenesis. J Endocrinol 1996; 150::457-464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Messmer UK, Winkel G, Briner BA, Pfeilschifter J. Suppression of apoptosis by glucocorticoids in glomerular endothelial cells: effects on proapoptotic pathways. Br J Pharmacol 2000; 129:1673-1683[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Yazawa H, Sasagawa I, Suzuki Y, Nakada T. Glucocorticoid hormone can suppress apoptosis of rat testicular germ cells induced by testicular ischemia. Fertil Steril 2001; 75:980-985[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Azmi TI, O'Shea JD. Mechanism of deletion of endothelial cells during regression of the corpus luteum. Lab Invest 1984; 51:206-217[Medline]
  36. Friedman A, Weiss S, Levy N, Meidan R. Role of tumor necrosis factor {alpha} and its type I receptor in luteal regression: induction of programmed cell death in bovine corpus luteum-derived endothelial cells. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:1905-1912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Gaytán F, Morales C, García-Pardo L, Reymundo C, Bellido C, Sánchez-Criado JE. Macrophages, cell proliferation, and cell death in the human menstrual corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 1998; 59:417-425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Gaytán F, Morales C, García-Pardo L, Reymundo C, Bellido C, Sánchez-Criado JE. A quantitative study of changes in the human corpus luteum microvasculature during the menstrual cycle. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:914-919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Kockx MM, Knaapen MWM. The role of apoptosis in vascular disease. J Pathol 2000; 190:267-280[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Antakly T, Eisen HJ. Immunocytochemical localization of glucocorticoid receptor in target cells. Endocrinology 1984; 115:1984-1989[Abstract]
  41. Wikström AC, Bakke O, Okret S, Brönnegard M, Gustafsson JA. Intracellular localization of the glucocorticoid receptor: evidence for cytoplasmic and nuclear localization. Endocrinology 1987; 120:1232-1242[Abstract]
  42. Akner G, Wikström AN, Mossberg K, Sundqvist KG, Gustafsson JA. Morphometric studies of the localization of the glucocorticoid receptor in mammalian cells and of glucocorticoid hormone-induced effects. J Histochem Cytochem 1994; 42:645-657[Abstract]
  43. Bamberger CM, Schulte HM, Chrousos GP. Molecular determinants of glucocorticoid receptor function and tissue sensitivity to glucocorticoids. Endocr Rev 1996; 17:245-261[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Borski RJ. Nongenomic membrane actions of glucocorticoids in vertebrates. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2000; 11:427-436[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Gametchu B. Glucocorticoid receptor-like antigen in lymphoma cell membranes: correlation to cell lysis. Science 1987; 236:456-461[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Mankin HJ. Nontraumatic necrosis of bone (osteonecrosis). N Engl J Med 1992; 326:1473-1479[Medline]
  47. Huang TJ, Li S. Dexamethasone inhibits luteinizing hormone-induced synthesis of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in cultured rat preovulatory follicles. Biol Reprod 2001; 64:163-170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Fahey JV, Gurye PM, Munck A. Mechanisms of anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids. Adv Inflammation Res 1981; 2:21-51



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Myers, M. C. Lamont, S. van den Driesche, N. Mary, K. J. Thong, S. G. Hillier, and W. C. Duncan
Role of Luteal Glucocorticoid Metabolism during Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy in Women
Endocrinology, December 1, 2007; 148(12): 5769 - 5779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. Stocco, C. Telleria, and G. Gibori
The Molecular Control of Corpus Luteum Formation, Function, and Regression
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2007; 28(1): 117 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J Aguilar, H M Fraser, H Wilson, E Clutton, D J Shaw, and E D Watson
Temporal relationship between proliferating and apoptotic hormone-producing and endothelial cells in the equine corpus luteum
Reproduction, July 1, 2006; 132(1): 111 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
C. J. Hemmer, H. A. Lehr, K. Westphal, M. Unverricht, M. Kratzius, and E. C. Reisinger
Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: Reduction of Endothelial Cell Apoptosis In Vitro
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2005; 73(3): 1764 - 1770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M. R. Hussein
Apoptosis in the ovary: molecular mechanisms
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 162 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Sasson and A. Amsterdam
Stimulation of Apoptosis in Human Granulosa Cells from in Vitro Fertilization Patients and Its Prevention by Dexamethasone: Involvement of Cell Contact and Bcl-2 Expression
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3441 - 3451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaytán, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Criado, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaytán, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Criado, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gaytán, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Criado, J. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS