Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Sousa, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmut, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Sousa, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmut, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by De Sousa, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmut, I.
Biology of Reproduction 66, 642-650 (2002)
© 2002 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in the Pig: Control of Pronuclear Formation and Integration with Improved Methods for Activation and Maintenance of Pregnancy1

Paul A. De Sousaa, John R. Dobrinskyc, Jie Zhua, Alan L. Archibaldb, Alison Ainsliea, Wim Bosmaa, June Boweringa, John Brackena, Patricia M. Ferriera, Judy Fletchera, Bianca Gasparrinia, Linda Harknessa, Paul Johnstona, Marjorie Ritchiea, William A. Ritchiea, Ailsa Traversa, David Albertinid, Andras Dinnyesa, Timothy J. Kinga, and Ian Wilmut2,a

a Departments of Gene Expression and Development b Genomics and Bioinformatics, Roslin Institute, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, United Kingdom c Germplasm and Gamete Physiology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland 20705 d Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To clone a pig from somatic cells, we first validated an electrical activation method for use on ovulated oocytes. We then evaluated delayed versus simultaneous activation (DA vs. SA) strategies, the use of 2 nuclear donor cells, and the use of cytoskeletal inhibitors during nuclear transfer. Using enucleated ovulated oocytes as cytoplasts for fetal fibroblast nuclei and transferring cloned embryos into a recipient within 2 h of activation, a 2-h delay between electrical fusion and activation yielded blastocysts more reliably and with a higher nuclear count than did SA. Comparable rates of development using DA were obtained following culture of embryos cloned from ovulated or in vitro-matured cytoplasts and fibroblast or cumulus nuclei. Treatment of cloned embryos with cytochalasin B (CB) postfusion and for 6 h after DA had no impact on blastocyst development as compared with CB treatment postfusion only. Inclusion of a microtubule inhibitor such as nocodozole with CB before and after DA improved nuclear retention and favored the formation of single pronuclei in experiments using a membrane dye to reliably monitor fusion. However, no improvement in blastocyst development was observed. Using fetal fibroblasts as nuclear donor cells, a live cloned piglet was produced in a pregnancy that was maintained by cotransfer of parthenogenetic embryos.

developmental biology, early development, embryo, reproductive technology


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animal cloning by nuclear transfer (NT) depends upon many factors, most of which remain unknown. Some of the most important factors are the enabling technologies that define the practical working limits within each species. These technologies include techniques for donor cell isolation and culture, mature oocyte collection and activation, and embryo culture and transfer. In addition, reproductive differences among species can provide unique challenges. Attempts to clone pigs by somatic cell NT are illustrative of these circumstances. Despite recent improvements in the culture of porcine oocytes and embryos [1, 2], development of these techniques in pigs continues to lag behind that in other species. In addition, pigs require a minimum number of viable embryos to sustain pregnancy [3, 4], which can be a challenge in somatic cell cloning.

Recently, several research groups have succeeded in cloning piglets from somatic cells [57]. Despite differences in approach, at least 3 key similarities are evident. First, all groups relied on electrical stimulation to either activate and/or fuse reconstructed eggs. Second, despite improvements in embryo culture methodologies all groups transferred cloned embryos prior to the blastocyst stage. Third and perhaps most significant, all groups recognized the need to surmount pregnancy maintenance requirements.

Implicit to all recent NT experiments has been an appreciation of the importance of cell cycle coordination between donated nuclei and recipient egg cytoplasm to maintain DNA integrity and ploidy (reviewed in [8]). The DNA content of NT eggs can be regulated by controlling polar body extrusion after activation. This control has been achieved by the use of cytochalasin to depolymerize cortical microfilaments [9]. Thus, as exemplified in the mouse, the DNA content of an unreplicated diploid nucleus (2n, 2C) in G0/G1 can be preserved after its transfer by suppression of polar body extrusion. Conversely, the DNA content of a replicated diploid nucleus (2n, 4C) in G2 of the cell cycle or arrested in M-phase can be returned to an unreplicated state if polar body extrusion is permitted after transfer [1013]. In cases in which the DNA content of nuclear reconstructed embryos cannot be controlled via cytochalasin treatment, an alternative strategy might involve interference with microtubule spindle function using depolymerizing agents such as nocodozole or demecolcine.

In the present study, our objective was to clone a pig by somatic cell NT. Our approach involved integration of improvements in oocyte activation [14] and embryo transfer and pregnancy maintenance with NT experiments to evaluate reconstruction strategies, cell types, and control of nuclear formation.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study was conducted following approval by the Roslin Institute Animal Ethics Committee and with a project license issued under the Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986. The study consisted of 5 experiments, as detailed below.

In Vitro Oocyte and Embryo Culture

Unless otherwise noted, all chemical reagents used during oocyte/egg and embryo culture and micromanipulation were purchased from Sigma (Poole, Dorset, U.K.). Cumulus-oocyte complexes were collected from slaughterhouse ovaries and matured as described previously [14]. The base medium for embryo culture in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 39°C was NCSU 23 [15]. This medium was comprised of 108.73 mM NaCl, 4.78 mM KCl, 1.7 mM CaCl2, 1.19 MgSO4, 25.07 mM NaHCO3, 1.19 mM KH2PO4, 5.55 mM glucose, 1 mM glutamine, 7 mM taurine, 5 mM hypotaurine, 0.4% BSA-V, 100 U/L penicillin-G, and 50 mg/L streptomycin. Embryos were cultured in NCSU 23 in groups of 20–40 per 500 µl of medium. The base medium for handling mature oocytes (eggs) and embryos under atmospheric conditions was Hepes-buffered NCSU 23 (hb-NCSU 23). This medium was composed of 131.7 mM NaCl, 4.78 mM KCl, 1.7 mM CaCl2, 1.19 MgSO4, 2 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM Hepes, 1.19 mM KH2PO4, 5.55 mM glucose, 1 mM glutamine, 12 mM taurine, 0.4% BSA-V, 100 U/L penicillin G, and 50 mg/L streptomycin. For some procedures, Ca2+-free hb-NCSU 23 or NCSU 23 was used. Egg and embryo handling under atmospheric conditions was on surfaces heated to 34–37°C

In Vivo Oocyte Production

Ovulated oocytes for this study were produced from Large White gilts that were approximately 9 mo of age or older and weighed at least 120 kg at time of use. Donor gilts were superovulated after exhibiting a natural heat that may have been synchronized by feeding of 20 mg altrenogest (Regumate; Hoechst Roussel Vet Ltd., Milton Keynes, U.K.) daily for 18 days. Superovulation was achieved by 1 of 2 methods. In experiments I and II, midluteal gilts (11–16 days postestrus) were injected with 175 µg of cloprostenol (Planate; Schering-Plough Animal Health, Munich, Germany) and 1500 IU of eCG (PMSG; Intervet U.K. Ltd., Milton Keynes, U.K.) at 1900 h. Eighty-eight hours later, these gilts were injected with 750 IU hCG (Chorulon; Intervet U.K.). In experiments III–V between Day 11 and Day 15 following an observed estrus, gilts were fed 20 mg altrenogest once daily for 4 days and 20 mg altrenogest twice on the 5th day. On the 6th day, these gilts were injected with 1500 IU of eCG at 2000 h and with 750 IU hCG 83 h later.

Ovulation was monitored by transcutaneous ultrasound, using an Aloka SSD-500 machine with a 5-MHz convex linear probe. The probe was placed in the right inguinal area and directed dorsally in a sweeping fashion to locate an ovary. Gilts were first examined prior to 34 h post-hCG and again by 42 h post-hCG to identify the presence of follicles and to identify gilts that had ovulated prior to the intensive scanning. From 42 to 48 h post-hCG, gilts were scanned every 2 h. Ovulation was deemed to have occurred when all follicles were no longer visible or approximately 80% of follicles could not be detected, with ovulation time taken as the midpoint between successive positive and negative scans. Gilts that ovulated between 42 and 48 h post-hCG were used as oocyte donors for NT studies.

Nuclear Donor Cell Preparation

Fibroblast cells isolated from two Day 25 pig fetuses (A and B) were used as nuclear donors. Results in experiments II–IV were obtained using fibroblasts from fetus A, although similar results were observed using fibroblasts from fetus B (data not shown). Both cell populations were used in experiment V. Fibroblasts were isolated, frozen at low passage (passages 2–4), and cultured essentially as described by Campbell et al. [16]. After thawing, cells were cultured for 2 days at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air in Glasgow minimum essential medium (GMEM, G-5154; Sigma) modified by addition of 2 mM glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1x nonessential amino acids, and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Cells were then cultured for 5–6 days in the modified GMEM with FCS reduced to 0.5%. Confirmation that cells had left the cell cycle was obtained by immunostaining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen [17], which was normally reduced to <=1% of all cells examined. Following serum deprivation or resumption of growth in 10% FCS, >95% of cells examined (n = 50–100) retained a normal karyotype (2n = 38). In experiment III, cumulus cells were prepared by rapid dispersal of expanded cumulus complexes from either ovulated or in vitro-matured (IVM) oocytes in Ca2+-free hb-NCSU 23 using a Gilson P100 pipette.

Nuclear Transfer

Nuclear transfer was carried out as described by Campbell et al. [16] with the exceptions noted. Oocytes were stripped of cumulus by pipetting in 300 IU/ml hyluronidase in Ca2+-free hb-NCSU 23. Denuded oocytes were treated for 15 min in Ca2+-free hb-NCSU 23 containing 7.5 µg/ml cytochalasin B (CB) and 5 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 at 39°C. Oocytes were manually enucleated in Ca2+-free hb-NCSU 23 containing 7.5 µg/ml CB. Cytoplasts derived from enucleated oocytes were held and reconstructed in Ca2+-free hb-NCSU 23 at 39°C. In all experiments, the delay between fusion and activation was in Ca2+-free NCSU 23 at 39°C in 5% CO2 in air. Depending on the experiment this medium was supplemented with CB, nocodozole, or demecolcine.

Electrical pulses were used throughout the study for fusion and activation. The fusion medium was 0.3 M mannitol, 100 µM MgCl2, with the same medium supplemented with 50 µM CaCl2 for activation. For experiment I, oocytes were activated with three 80-µsec pulses of 1.25 kV/cm. This stimulation was also used in experiment II, for both fusion and activation in either delayed activation (DA) or simultaneous activation (SA) treatment groups. In all remaining experiments (III–V), this treatment was used for fusion, whereas activation of NT cytoplasts and IVM oocytes (to make parthenotes) was achieved using three 80-µsec pulses of 1 kV/cm. This transition coincided with our determination in concurrent experiments that activation by multiple pulses of the lower voltage yielded better parthenogenetic development to the blastocyst stage [14]. However, the higher voltage was still preferred for fusion. In all experiments, fusion was assessed by brightfield microscopy 2 h after administration of the first electrical stimulation. Only fused karyoplast-cytoplast complexes were activated when activation was delayed.

To make diploid parthenote embryos, activated ovulated (experiment I) or IVM (experiments III–V) oocytes were treated for 6 h with 7.5 µg/ml CB in NCSU 23 at 39°C in 5% CO2 in air. In experiment II, both DA and SA groups were cultured in the presence of 7.5 µg/ml CB for 2 h postfusion. However, DA embryos were not treated with CB after activation. This DA strategy (CB postfusion for 2 h and drug-free postactivation) was the standard against which all other postfusion or postactivation treatments were compared. In experiment III, this standard was compared against a 2-h postfusion and 6-h postactivation culture with 7.5 µg/ml CB, the latter in NCSU 23. In experiments IV and V, the standard was compared against treatment with 7.5 µg/ml CB combined with 2 µg/ml nocodozole or 0.4 µg/ml demecolcine, postfusion or postfusion and activation in NCSU 23.

In experiment II, ovulated oocytes in each replicate trial were equally allocated between both groups. Following NT, DA and SA clones were transferred into contralateral horns of recipient gilts within 2 h of activation. Clones were recovered 3–4 days later as 2- to 8-cell embryos and cultured to Day 6 to avoid reduced recovery encountered when flushing uteri to collect hatched blastocysts. In experiments III–IV, cloned embryos were cultured in vitro for 7 days. In experiment V, cloned embryos were transferred to recipients within 1 h of activation.

Confirmation of Fibroblast-Cytoplast Fusion by Membrane Stain Transfer

In experiment IV, transfer of octadecyl rhodamine B dye (R18, O-246; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) from fibroblast to cytoplast membranes was used to confirm cell fusion. R18 was stocked at a concentration of 1 mg/ml in ethanol and stored at -20°C for up to 1 mo. Within 1 h of being used as nuclear donors, fibroblasts in suspension (5 x 104 cells/ml) were stained with 0.1 µg/ml R18 in Dulbecco PBS (BR14; Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, U.K.) for 15 min at room temperature on a rocker platform. Excess stain in solution was then removed by centrifugation (5 min at 750 x g) and resuspension 3 times in 10 ml of modified GMEM before final resuspension in 1 ml of the same for NT. Although R18 dye transfer was occasionally assessed vitally under ultraviolet irradiation (excitation/emission: 546/580{lambda}), all data were collected following fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde in Dulbecco PBS.

Oocyte Recovery, Embryo Transfer, and Pregnancy Maintenance

Oocyte collection and embryo transfer were conducted under general anesthesia. Following a midline laparotomy, oocytes and embryos were recovered or transferred, respectively, in hb-NCSU 23 at 39°C. To assist with the establishment and maintenance of pregnancies in experiment V, 1 of 3 strategies was implemented. The first involved injection with 5 mg (1 ml) of estradiol benzoate on Day 11 and Day 15 following estrus. The second involved an attempt to induce an accessory set of corpora lutei by injection with 1200 IU eCG at 900 h on Day 9 following estrus and with 500 IU of hCG at 1300 h on Day 12 following estrus. The third strategy involved cotransfer of 60–65 parthenote embryos prepared using IVM oocytes activated and made diploid the day before transfer [14].

Microsatellite Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood of the surrogate sow, fibroblast cell cultures, and piglet ear punches according to the method of Miller et al. [17]. The genotypes were determined for 23 microsatellite loci selected from the panel recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization-International Society for Animal Genetics for studies of genetic diversity in pigs [18] (http://www.toulouse.inra.fr/lgc/pig/panel.htm). Polymorphism for each marker was based on allelic variations in length arising from the number of simple tandem repeats at each locus. Length variations were assayed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification with fluorescently labeled locus-specific primers and PAGE on an automated DNA sequencer (ABI 373; Applied Biosystems, Cheshire, U.K.). Proprietary software (GeneScan and Genotyper; Applied Biosystems) was used to estimate PCR fragment sizes in nucleotides.

Statistical Analysis

In experiment II, the effect of activation strategy was estimated using the method of Breslow and Clayton [19] to allow for binomial variation among embryos and extra variation among trials and between uterine sides. The significance of effects in the logistic scale was determined approximately using 2-tailed Student t-tests with degrees of freedom based on the numbers of trials available for the paired comparison of strategies. In all remaining experiments, data were analyzed by a 1-way or a repeated-measures ANOVA, followed by pairwise t-test comparisons of means.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Experiment I: Developmental Competence of Electrically Activated Ovulated Oocytes

A total of 249 ovulated oocytes were recovered from 18 gilts over 6 days, with the number of oocytes recovered per gilt ranging from 7 to 23. Oocytes were activated and cultured separately according to donor identity, and the proportion of oocytes forming parthenote blastocysts after 7 days was plotted with respect to donor time of ovulation (Fig. 1). Half of the gilts ovulated between 45 and 47.5 h post-hCG, and the remaining gilts were roughly equally distributed between earlier (42–43.5 h) and later (49–50.5 h) ovulation times. The proportion of activated oocytes forming parthenote blastocysts from gilts ovulating earlier or later than the midperiod did not exceed 30%, and 4 of 9 gilts ovulating in these periods yielded no blastocysts at all. In contrast, of 9 gilts ovulating during the midperiod (45–47.5 h post-hCG), 6 yielded parthenote blastocyst rates greater than 50%, and 1 gilt produced no blastocysts at all. Regardless of ovulation time, there was no significant difference in mean (±SEM) parthenote blastocyst nuclear counts (early: 22 ± 4, n = 9 mid: 26 ± 1, n = 54 late: 23 ± 3, n = 5).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Correlation of donor gilt ovulation time with oocyte competence to form parthenote blastocysts in vitro. Ovulated oocytes were recovered from individual gilts whose timing of ovulation was monitored by transcutaneous ultrasound. Following electrical activation and treatment with CB to make diploid parthenotes, embryos were cultured for 7 days to the blastocyst stage. The proportion of parthenogenetically activated oocytes from each gilt forming blastocysts was plotted with respect to ovulation time. The number of oocytes activated and cultured from individual donors is noted (in parentheses), from which blastocyst proportions were calculated

Experiment II: Delayed Versus Simultaneous Fusion and Activation

Using the same electrical stimulation as in experiment I, development of embryos cloned from fetal fibroblast nuclei and ovulated oocytes was compared in 4 trials following delayed versus simultaneous fusion and activation. All fused karyoplast-cytoplast complexes were activated when fusion was delayed. Across replicates, cell fusion was normally higher for the DA group, with the difference approaching significance (Table 1, P = 0.08). Following in vivo development for 3–4 days, there were no apparent differences between treatment groups in embryo recovery, which was 50–70% of transferred embryos in each trial (data not shown). The average cleavage and blastocyst rates were 33% and 7% for DA and 16% and 1% for SA, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in corresponding values between these groups (P {approx} 0.25), DA was more consistent in providing at least 1 blastocyst in every trial, with blastocyst nuclear counts ranging from 18 to 49. In contrast, only 1 trial yielded an SA blastocyst, with a low nuclear count. Based on these results, SA was abandoned as an NT strategy in the pig.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Effect of DA versus SA for pig cytoplasts reconstructed with fetal fibroblast nuclei.*

Experiment III: Evaluating the Need for CB Following DA

We next considered whether cloned embryo development could be improved by treatment with CB for 6 h after DA, using ovulated or IVM oocytes as cytoplasts and fetal fibroblasts or adult cumulus cells as karyoplasts. For all cytoplast/karyoplast combinations, postactivation treatment with CB had no appreciable effect on the rates of cleavage, the production of blastocysts, or blastocyst nuclear counts, which remained essentially the same as in experiment II. Rates of cell fusion were consistently higher with fibroblast than with cumulus cells using either ovulated (60% vs. 40%) or IVM (80% vs. 40%) cytoplasts (Table 2). In experiments with IVM oocytes, parthenote controls were produced using the same electrical activation treatment and 6 h of CB treatment (Table 2, None = no karyoplast). Parthenote development was highly consistent across trials. After 7 days in culture, average parthenote blastocyst nuclear count was 30, with nuclear counts in cloned blastocysts approaching this value. Cloned embryo cleavage rates were comparable to those of parthenotes; however, developmentally arrested cloned embryos differed by having fewer or aberrantly structured nuclei as revealed by Hoechst staining (data not shown). Because cumulus cells were not superior karyoplasts to fibroblasts they were abandoned in subsequent experiments. In addition, because the use of CB postactivation did not confer improved development, the standard DA strategy continued to restrict CB to the postfusion period.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Effect of cytoplast source, karyoplast type, and postactivation treatment with CB on the in vitro development of cloned pig embryos

Experiment IV: Control of Nuclear Retention in Cloned Embryos

We considered whether poor cloned embryo development could be related to aberrant control of DNA content during the first cell cycle and whether this problem could be corrected by combining CB with nocodozole (N; 2 µg/ml) after activation to interfere with microtubule spindle function. In preliminary experiments, we reconstructed IVM oocyte cytoplasts with fetal fibroblast cells whose membranes had been prestained with the red fluorescent dye R18. In 2 independent trials, examination 18 h postactivation consistently revealed that chromatin was completely internalized in only 4/10, 6/10, and 5/10 fused (R18 positive) cytoplasts when postfusion treatment with CB was followed by no treatment, or a 6-h postactivation culture with either CB or CB/N, respectively. Postactivation treatment with CB/N also resulted in all fused cytoplasts containing single pronuclei, in contrast to a mixture of single and multiple pronuclei (no treatment) or only multiple pronuclei (CB for 6 h).

To improve nuclear retention, we used ovulated cytoplasts with R18 stained fibroblasts and only compared our standard DA treatment (CB postfusion only) with CB/N beginning postfusion and for 6 h postactivation. Nuclear fate was followed at 2 h postfusion (hpf) and 18 h postactivation (hpa). Cell-cytoplast fusion was confirmed by dye transfer in approximately 80% of cytoplasts assessed by brightfield as fused (F) and fixed 2 hpf (Table 3). Conversely, only 5% of cytoplasts assessed as nonfused (NF) at the same time point were stained with R18, likely depicting the error of assessment by brightfield microscopy. Following activation and culture, the proportion of NF cytoplasts showing R18 membrane staining increased to 25–30%, probably because of further fusion during activation. At 18 hpa, the proportion of F cytoplasts positive for membrane staining was 66% and 90% following postactivation culture in medium alone or in medium containing CB/N, respectively, although this difference was not significant (ANOVA, P = 0.2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Effect of CB and N on nuclear retention and structure in ovulated cytoplasts reconstructed with fetal fibroblast nuclei

The presence of Hoechst-stained chromatin in cytoplasts was correlated with R18 staining of cytoplast membranes (Table 3). At 2 hpf, almost all Hoechst-stained chromatin in cytoplasts was condensed. At 18 hpa, the incidence of Hoechst staining in F cytoplasts was higher for the CB/N group (P < 0.05). Single and multiple pronuclei, in addition to condensed mitotic configurations of chromatin, were observed in both treatment groups at this time point. However, treatment with CB/N resulted in an increase in the prevalence of single pronuclei in F and NF cytoplast groups, approaching significance in the former (ANOVA, P = 0.06).

In light of the enhanced nuclear retention observed with CB/N begun at 2 hpf and continued up to 6 hpa, we tested this combination for development to the blastocyst stage following DA of ovulated cytoplasts receiving fibroblast nuclei. No improvement in cleavage, blastocyst rates, or blastocyst nuclear counts was observed (Table 4, treatment group 1). In addition, in 3 trials involving reconstruction of fibroblast karyoplasts with a total of 88 IVM cytoplasts, no blastocysts were produced. However, in those IVM experiments there were no differences in the development of parthenote controls treated with either CB (n = 119) or CB/N (n = 119) for 6 hpa, in cleavage rates (71% vs. 76%), blastocyst rates (39% vs. 29%), or blastocyst nuclear counts (27 ± 2, n = 19 vs. 29 ± 3, n = 22). Thus, treatment with CB/N for 6 hpa was not overtly detrimental to parthenotes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. In vitro development of cloned pig embryos following DA of ovulated cytoplasts reconstructed with fibroblast nuclei and treatment with CB and N or D

To strike a balance between improved nuclear retention and the possibility that prolonged treatment with microtubule and microfilament inhibitors was more detrimental to cloned embryos, a final series of experiments were conducted using N or demecolcine (D; 0.4 µg/ml) with CB after fusion alone (Table 4, treatment groups 2–4). Again, there was no evidence of enhanced development to the blastocyst stage. In these experiments, nuclear retention was retrospectively estimated by Hoechst staining of all cloned embryos, including those that had not cleaved or had failed to form blastocysts. This analysis suggested that 72%, 78%, and 67% of reconstructed cytoplasts retained nuclei following CB (n = 92), CB/N (n = 91), and CB/D (n = 90) postfusion treatments, respectively. Although imprecise, this analysis suggested that combining microtubule-depolymerizing agents with CB during the postfusion period alone did not improve nuclear retention.

Experiment V: In Vivo Competence of Cloned Embryos

Following experiments to optimize enabling methodologies and development of cloned embryos to the blastocyst stage, we assessed in vivo development with the assistance of various pregnancy maintenance strategies. Two fibroblast populations (A and B) were fused to ovulated oocyte cytoplasts and cultured with CB or CB/D for 2 h before activation and immediate transfer. Both F and NF eggs assessed by brightfield were activated and transferred. The NF eggs were expected to contribute a small proportion of embryos that were effectively simultaneously fused and activated, based on our results in experiment IV (see Table 3). Nine transfers into recipients were carried out (Table 5). Two pregnancies were established using clones treated with CB/D postfusion. Of these 2, one was established with each fibroblast cell line and was maintained with either estradiol or cotransfer of parthenotes derived from IVM oocytes (see Materials and Methods). Both were lost by 40 days of gestation. One pregnancy was established from clones produced by the standard DA strategy (CB postfusion only) and was maintained by cotransfer of parthenotes. This pregnancy resulted in a single healthy piglet delivered naturally at term (121 days; Fig. 2). Genetic analysis confirmed that the piglet was identical to the cell line (B) used for NT at all 23 polymorphic microsatellite loci examined. In addition, at 5 loci the piglet lacked any of the alleles detected in the surrogate mother, confirming that she made no genetic contribution to the piglet (Table 6). The genotype of the piglet differed from the genotype of cell line A at 13 of the 23 loci tested. At the time of submission of this manuscript, the piglet was more than 4 mo old and in good health.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. In vivo development of cloned pig embryos



View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. One-wk-old piglet cloned from fetal fibroblast cells


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6. Microsatellite analysis of surrogate, piglet, and nuclear donor cells


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, we combined improvements in pig oocyte activation and pregnancy maintenance with an evaluation of NT treatments to clone a viable piglet from somatic cells. Optimal competence for development of electrically activated oocytes was correlated with a defined window of ovulation time. Incorporating this knowledge into our cloning studies, we determined that blastocyst development was more consistent when activation of NT cytoplasts was delayed relative to fusion. DA yielded comparable development regardless of whether fetal fibroblasts or adult cumulus cells were used as karyoplasts and of whether cytoplasts were derived from ovulated or IVM oocytes. In addition, nuclear retention following DA could be improved by combined treatment with CB and N, although there was no apparent improvement in blastocyst development. We used a novel pregnancy maintenance strategy involving cotransfer of parthenote embryos to sustain cloned embryo development to term.

Oocytes used as cytoplasts in this study were electrically activated using an optimized protocol [14]. Previously, we determined that activation of oocytes by this method was capable of yielding pregnancies, which by ultrasound could be detected until at least 50 days of gestation (unpublished results). An integral part of that protocol developed using IVM oocytes involved activation during an optimal window at approximately 44 h of maturation [14]. In the present study, an increase in parthenote blastocyst potential was correlated with oocytes ovulated between 45 and 47.5 h post-hCG and activated 3–4 h later. Our results contrast with previous findings by Polejaeva et al. [5], who concluded that pig parthenote development to the blastocyst stage was not age dependent and did not surpass 30% of activated oocytes. This difference may be explained by their activation of oocytes from 51.5 to 60 h post-hCG, the former time point representing the very end of the window suggested by our results. To increase the pool of oocytes serving as cytoplasts in our study, we accepted as donors gilts that ovulated from 42 to 48 h post-hCG. However, our protocol for inducing ovulation resulted in approximately half of stimulated gilts ovulating during our optimum window. In mice, optimum parthenogenetic development is restricted to oocyte activation over a 4-h period [20]. In contrast, the developmental competence of cow oocytes extends over 20 h [21]. The capacity to predict oocyte developmental performance on the basis of ovulation time would substantially reduce the cost and effort associated with using ovulated pig oocytes in future studies.

With reliance on electrical activation to initiate cloned embryo development, we observed more consistent development to the blastocyst stage following DA than following SA. This difference may have been related in part to a reduction in the efficiency of fusion associated with the latter, resulting in fewer reconstructed cytoplasts. In the rabbit, fusion of adult fibroblasts with preactivated cytoplasts derived from ovulated oocytes is less successful than when fusion precedes activation [22]. Cortical granule exocytosis that occurs during egg activation may interfere with the apposition of membranes required for karyoplast-cytoplast fusion. Treatment with CB, which disrupts cortical microfilaments known to control granule distribution [23], may compound such an effect. A simultaneous fusion and activation strategy was an integral part of one group's failed attempt to clone pigs from fetal fibroblasts [24]. Both blastocyst yields and cell numbers in that study were comparable to our results with this method. However, Polejaeva et al. [5] successfully cloned piglets from adult granulosa cells after combining simultaneous fusion and activation with serial NT into pronuclear zygotes.

Our study joins 2 other reported implementations of a DA strategy to clone pigs by somatic NT. Onishi et al. [6] accomplished NT by microinjection and a 3- to 4-h delay in electrical activation. Using IVM oocytes, Betthauser et al. [7] also reported a 4-h delay between fusion and activation, the latter accomplished by treatment with ionomycin and then the serine-threonine kinase inhibitor 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP). Prolonged exposure of incoming nuclei to a cytoplasm rich in metaphase-promoting factor (MPF) causes chromosome condensation, as we observed after 2 h. This condensation is believed to facilitate undefined nuclear changes that are essential for development [25, 26]. Diminished development to the blastocyst stage has been reported after DA up to 6 h (vs. 2 and 4 h) following NT with pig fibroblast cells [27]. This reduced development may have been due in part to differences in the timing of activation relative to oocyte age. In the study by Betthauser et al. [7], fusion was done in double the concentration of calcium, which in our hands results in egg activation [14]. After electrical activation of oocytes or cytoplasts into which nuclei have already been introduced, pronuclear formation normally only begins after 4–6 h [28, 29]. Treatment of activated cytoplasts with ionomycin and 6-DMAP in the study by Betthauser et al. [7] would have provided an additional activation stimulus that would have accelerated the decline in MPF activity brought on by activation [30]. This decline would have reduced the period over which the cytoplast environment could influence nuclear structure.

To our knowledge, we are the first researchers to explore the inefficiency of nuclear retention in pig NT cytoplasts and the benefit of combining N with CB treatment. Others have reported poor rates of pronuclear formation [5, 31], which could be accounted for by reduced nuclear retention. When applied to parthenogenetically activated pig oocytes, CB effectively controls polar body formation and egg ploidy [14, 32]. However, in our study, postactivation treatment of cloned embryos with CB did not enhance development to the blastocyst stage, and observations on NT cytoplasts prepared from IVM oocytes confirmed that nuclear retention was poor. Pig oocytes appear to be distinct from those of the mouse, in which CB is sufficient to manipulate polar body emission in either circumstance [1013, 33]. These differences between species may relate to differences in microtubule spindle organization. Pig meiotic spindles differ at their poles from both mitotic and meiotic spindles in mice by lacking {gamma}-tubulin [34]. Because {gamma}-tubulin normally serves to seed microtubule organization in centrosomes, its absence in pig oocyte spindle poles would make spindle dynamics even more sensitive to microtubule depolymerization [35, 36]. Associations between the spindle and the oocyte cortex are also likely to differ between pig and mouse oocytes, as suggested by differences in the direction of spindle rotation with respect to the egg cortex following activation [34].

Treatment of NT sheep and cow cytoplasts with 6-DMAP after activation has previously been shown to promote nuclear retention and the formation of single pronuclei, as described for CB/N [36, 37]. In our study, there was no improvement in development despite improved nuclear retention. In mouse oocytes, spindle assembly checkpoints prevent meiotic cell cycle progression when the spindle is disrupted with microtubule inhibitors [38, 39]. To our knowledge, this question has not been examined in pig oocytes. If a parallel exists, then persistent treatment with N after activation in the pig could have delayed cell cycle-associated changes in cytoplasmic activities until withdrawal of this agent. Such a delay could have offset any benefit incurred by improved nuclear retention.

In our study, NT embryos were transferred to recipients within a few hours of activation, earlier than those reported by other groups who have recently reported success. We were compelled to transfer prior to embryo compaction after determining that unprotected oviductal transfer of zona pellucida-compromised precompaction pig embryos permits development to term (unpublished results). Recent somatic pig cloning studies have also described transfer of cleaved NT embryos 20–48 h postactivation [6, 7]. Polejaeva et al. [5] also transferred embryos within hours of completion of serial NT. However karyoplasts in their study would have been in an oocyte cytoplasmic environment in vitro for longer, with chromatin having a greater potential exposure to damaging oxygen free radicals [4042]. In general, our interest in transferring cloned embryos in vivo as soon as possible was driven by the perception that pig oocyte and embryo culture environments remain suboptimal. Despite this our culture system was still comparable to that reported for the production of fertilized embryos by in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization, and in vitro culture [43, 44].

Cloned embryo pregnancies in our study were established using timed administration of estradiol and parthenote cotransfer, with the latter yielding a piglet. Of 2 of the 3 pregnancies assisted with parthenotes, 1 was lost between Day 30 and Day 40, although the fetuses that survived to this stage may have all been parthenotes, which are capable of being detected by ultrasound up to Day 50 of gestation (unpublished results). Previously, somatic NT pregnancies have been maintained to term by transfer of large numbers of NT embryos (100) per recipient [6], gonadotropin injections [5], or cotransfer with mated embryos [7]. In our study, gonadotropin injections were unsuccessful, although we only attempted this strategy with 2 recipients. We did not attempt cotransfer with mated embryos out of concern that these embryos might outcompete developmentally inferior clones [6, 24]. However, transferred and mated embryos can be reliably distinguished using microsatellite genetic analyses (unpublished results). Prior to transferring cloned embryos, we exemplified the utility of parthenote cotransfer for sustaining pregnancies with 3 fertilized embryos, less than the 4 or 5 required for an unassisted pregnancy (unpublished results). We conclude, parthenote cotransfer contributed to the maintenance of the cloned embryo pregnancy to term because the number of fused and activated karyoplast-cytoplast complexes transferred (46) coupled with our cloned blastocyst production rate in vitro (2–5%) would not have yielded more than 2 viable clones to establish a pregnancy.

Our successful cloning of a piglet by somatic cell NT represents the cumulative reward of systematic research on several fronts. This research has included studies of the control and monitoring of ovulation, pig oocyte activation [14], embryo transfer, pregnancy maintenance, and NT biology. Clearly, improvements can still be made, most significantly with respect to enhancing early development in culture [7]. A better appreciation of nuclear changes within the first cell cycle will be instrumental to future success.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Mrs. C. Marshall for collection and processing of abattoir derived ovarian tissue, Ms. Lori Schreier for assistance with oocyte and embryo handling and media preparation, Mrs. H. Finlayson for microsatellite genotyping, and Mrs. C. MacCorquodale for assistance with statistical analyses. We also acknowledge Mr. R. Field for photographic services and the support staff at Dryden and Mount Marle farms, especially Mr. B.G. Garth, Mr. J.C. Penman, and Mr. M. Malcolm-Smith.


    FOOTNOTES
 
First decision: 25 July 2001.

1 This work was funded by Geron Bio-Med. Back

2 Correspondence. FAX: 44 0131 527 4493; ian.wilmut{at}bbsrc.ac.uk Back

Accepted: October 22, 2001.

Received: May 31, 2001.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Kikuchi K, Kashiwazaki N, Noguchi J, Shimada A, Takahashi R, Hirabayashi M, Shino M, Ueda M, Kaneko H. Developmental competence, after transfer to recipients, of porcine oocytes matured, fertilized, and cultured in vitro. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:336-340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Machaty Z, Thompson JG, Abeydeera LR, Day BN, Prather RS. Inhibitors of mitochondrial ATP production at the time of compaction improve development of in vitro produced porcine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 2001; 58:39-44[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Polge C, Rowson A, Chang MC. The effect of reducing the number of embryos during early stages of gestation on the maintenance of pregnancy in the pig. J Reprod Fertil 1966; 12:395-397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Dzuik P. Effect of migration, distribution and spacing of pig embryos on pregnancy and fetal survival. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1985; 33:57-63[Medline]
  5. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KHS. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 2000; 407:86-90[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H, Perry ACF. Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science 2000; 289:1188-1190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Betthauser J, Forsberg E, Augenstein M, Childs L, Eilertsen K, Enos J, Forsythe T, Golueke P, Jurgella G, Koppang R, Lesmeister T, Mallon K, Mell G, Misica P, Pace M, Pfister-Genskow M, Strelchenko N, Voelker G, Watt S, Thompson S, Bishop M. Production of cloned pigs from in vitro systems. Nat Biotechnol 2000; 18:1055-1059[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Campbell KHS, Loi P, Otaegui PJ, Wilmut I. Cell cycle co-ordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Rev Reprod 1996; 1:40-46[Abstract]
  9. Smith LC, Wilmut I. Influence of nuclear and cytoplasmic activity on the development in vivo of sheep embryos after nuclear transplantation. Biol Reprod 1989; 40:1027-1035[Abstract]
  10. Kono T, Kwon OY, Watanabe T, Nakahara T. Development of mouse enucleated oocytes receiving a nucleus from different stages of the second cell cycle. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 94:481-487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kwon OY, Kono T. Production of identical sextuplet mice by transferring metaphase nuclei from four-cell embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:13010-13013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wakayama T, Perry ACF, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 1998; 394:369-374[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Wakayama T, Rodriguez I, Perry ACF, Yanagimachi R, Mombaerts P. Mice cloned from embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:14984-14989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Zhu J, Telfer EE, Fletcher J, Springbett A, Dobrinsky JR, De Sousa PA, Wilmut I. Improvement of an electrical activation protocol for porcine oocytes. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:635-641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Petters RM, Wells KD. Culture of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1993; 48:61-73[Medline]
  16. Campbell KHS, Ritchie WA, Ferrier PM. Nuclear transfer from an established cell line. In: Celis JE (ed.), Cell Biology. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998: 487–501
  17. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HH. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1988; 16:1215[Free Full Text]
  18. Laval G, Iannuccelli N, Legault G, Milan D, Groenen MAM, Giuffra E, Andersson L, Nissen PH, Jørgensen CB, Beeckmann P, Geldermann H, Foulley JL, Chevalet C, Ollivier L. Genetic diversity of eleven European pig breeds. Genet Sel Evol 2000; 32:187-203[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Breslow NE, Clayton DG. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 1993; 88:9-25[CrossRef]
  20. Pinyopummin A, Takahashi Y, Hishinuma M, Kanagawa H. Development of haploid and diploid mouse parthenogenomes: effect of oocyte aging in vivo. Jpn J Vet Res 1993; 41:81-87[Medline]
  21. Presicce GA, Yang X. Nuclear dynamics of parthenogenesis of bovine oocytes matured in vitro for 20 and 40 h and activated with combined ethanol and cycloheximide treatment. Mol Reprod Dev 1994; 37:61-68[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Dinnyes A, Dai Y, Barber M, Liu L, Xu J, Zhou P, Yang X. Development of cloned embryos from adult rabbit fibroblasts: effect of activation treatment and donor cell preparation. Biol Reprod 2001; 64::257-263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kim NH, Day BN, Lee HT, Chung KS. Microfilament assembly and cortical granule distribution during maturation, parthenogenetic activation and fertilization in the porcine oocyte. Zygote 1996; 4:145-149[Medline]
  24. Verma PJ, Du ZT, Crocker L, Faast R, Grupen CG, McIlfatrick SM, Ashman RJ, Lyons IG, Nottle MB. In vitro development of porcine nuclear transfer embryos constructed using fetal fibroblasts. Mol Reprod Dev 2000; 57:262-269[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Szollosi D, Czolowska R, Szollosi MS, Tarkowski AKJ. Remodelling of mouse thymocyte nuclei depends on the time of their transfer into activated, homologous oocytes. J Cell Sci 1988; 91:603-613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Campbell KHS, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I. Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 1996; 380:64-66[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Koo DB, Kang YK, Choi YH, Park JS, Han SK, Park IY, Kim SU, Lee KK, Son DS, Chang WK, Han YM. In vitro development of reconstructed porcine oocytes after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:986-992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Liu L, Lee C, Moor RM. DNA synthesis, microtubule and nuclear dynamics in porcine parthenotes. Zygote 1996; 4:139-144[Medline]
  29. Lai L, Tao Z, Machaty A, Kuhholzer B, Day BN, Prather RS. Feasibility of producing porcine nuclear transfer embryos by using tetraploid fibroblasts as donor nuclei. Theriogenology 2000; 53:231
  30. Szollosi MS, Kubiak JZ, Debey P, de Pennart H, Scollosi D, Maro B. Inhibition of protein kinases by 6-dimethylaminopurine accelerates the transition to interphase in activated mouse oocytes. J Cell Sci 1993; 104:861-872[Abstract]
  31. Tao T, Boquest AC, Machaty A, Pettersen AL, Day BN, Prather RS. Development of pig embryos by nuclear transfer of cultured fibroblast cells. Cloning 1999; 1:55-62
  32. Kure-bayashi S, Miyake M, Katayama M, Miyano T, Kato S. Development of porcine blastocysts from in vitro matured and activated haploid and diploid oocytes. Theriogenology 1996; 46:1027-1036
  33. Maro B, Johnson MH, Webb M, Flach G. Mechanism of polar body formation in the mouse: an interaction between the chromosomes, the cytoskeleton and the plasma membrane. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1986; 92:11-32[Medline]
  34. Lee J, Miyano T, Moor RM. Spindle formation and dynamics of {gamma}-tubulin and nuclear mitotic apparatus protein distribution during meiosis in pig and mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:1184-1192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Gueth-Hallonet C, Antony C, Aghion J, Santa-Maria A, Lajoie-Mazenc I, Wright M, Maro B. {gamma}-Tubulin is present in acentriolar MTOCs during early mouse development. J Cell Sci 1993; 105:157-166[Abstract]
  36. Loi P, Ledda S, Fulka J, Cappai P, Moor RM. Development of parthenogenetic and cloned ovine embryos: effect of activation protocols. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:1177-1187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Liu L, Ju JC, Yang X. Differential inactivation of maturation-promoting factor and mitogen-activated protein kinase following parthenogenetic activation of bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod 1998; 59:537-545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Fulka J Jr, Moor RM, Fulka J. Sister chromatid separation and the metaphase-anaphase transition in mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 1994; 165::410-417[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Moses RM, Kline D, Masui Y. Maintenance of metaphase in colcemid-treated mouse eggs by distinct calcium and 6-dimethylamino-purine (6-DMAP)-sensitive mechanisms. Dev Biol 1995; 167:329-337[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Dizdaroglu M. Oxidative damage to DNA in mammalian chromatin. Mutat Res 1992; 275:331-342[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Johnson MH, Nasr-Esfahani M. Radical solutions and cultural problems: could free oxygen radicals be responsible for the impaired development of preimplantation mammalian embryos in vitro. Bioessays 1994; 16:31-38[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Olsen SE, Seidel GE Jr. Culture of in vitro-produced bovine embryos with vitamin E improves development in vitro and after transfer to recipients. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:248-252[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Abeydeera LR, Wang WH, Prather RS, Day BN. Maturation in vitro of pig oocytes in protein-free culture media: fertilization and subsequent embryo development in vitro. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:213-218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Han YM, Prather RS, Day BN. Morphologic evaluation and actin filament distribution in porcine embryos produced in vitro and in vivo. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:1020-1028[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E. Popova, M. Bader, and A. Krivokharchenko
Full-Term Development of Rat after Transfer of Nuclei from Two-Cell Stage Embryos
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2006; 75(4): 524 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. Kawahara, T. Wakai, K.-I. Yamanaka, J. Kobayashi, S. Sugimura, T. Shimizu, H. Matsumoto, J.-H. Kim, H. Sasada, and E. Sato
Caffeine promotes premature chromosome condensation formation and in vitro development in porcine reconstructed embryos via a high level of maturation promoting factor activity during nuclear transfer
Reproduction, September 1, 2005; 130(3): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S J Martins da Silva, J O Gardner, J E Taylor, A Springbett, P A De Sousa, and R A Anderson
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes bovine oocyte cytoplasmic competence for embryo development
Reproduction, April 1, 2005; 129(4): 423 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
L. Jiang, D. B. Carter, J. Xu, X. Yang, R. S. Prather, and X. C. Tian
Telomere Lengths in Cloned Transgenic Pigs
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2004; 70(6): 1589 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
C. J. Koh and A. Atala
Tissue Engineering, Stem Cells, and Cloning: Opportunities for Regenerative Medicine
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2004; 15(5): 1113 - 1125.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y.-H. Choi, L. B. Love, M. E. Westhusin, and K. Hinrichs
Activation of Equine Nuclear Transfer Oocytes: Methods and Timing of Treatment in Relation to Nuclear Remodeling
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2004; 70(1): 46 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.-W. Lee, S.-C. Wu, X. C. Tian, M. Barber, T. Hoagland, J. Riesen, K.-H. Lee, C.-F. Tu, W. T.K. Cheng, and X. Yang
Production of Cloned Pigs by Whole-Cell Intracytoplasmic Microinjection
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 995 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
C. R. Cogle, S. M. Guthrie, R. C. Sanders, W. L. Allen, E. W. Scott, and B. E. Petersen
An Overview of Stem Cell Research and Regulatory Issues
Mayo Clin. Proc., August 1, 2003; 78(8): 993 - 1003.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Hao, L. Lai, J. Mao, G.-S. Im, A. Bonk, and R. S. Prather
Apoptosis and In Vitro Development of Preimplantation Porcine Embryos Derived In Vitro or by Nuclear Transfer
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2003; 69(2): 501 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
B. Gasparrini, S. Gao, A. Ainslie, J. Fletcher, M. McGarry, W.A. Ritchie, A.J. Springbett, E.W. Overstrom, I. Wilmut, and P.A. De Sousa
Cloned Mice Derived from Embryonic Stem Cell Karyoplasts and Activated Cytoplasts Prepared by Induced Enucleation
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2003; 68(4): 1259 - 1266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Miyoshi, S. J. Rzucidlo, S. L. Pratt, and S. L. Stice
Improvements in Cloning Efficiencies May Be Possible by Increasing Uniformity in Recipient Oocytes and Donor Cells
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2003; 68(4): 1079 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Zhu, E. E. Telfer, J. Fletcher, A. Springbett, J. R. Dobrinsky, P. A. De Sousa, and I. Wilmut
Improvement of an Electrical Activation Protocol for Porcine Oocytes
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 635 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Sousa, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmut, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Sousa, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmut, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by De Sousa, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmut, I.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS