Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Embree-Ku, M.
Right arrow Articles by Boekelheide, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Embree-Ku, M.
Right arrow Articles by Boekelheide, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Embree-Ku, M.
Right arrow Articles by Boekelheide, K.
Biology of Reproduction 66, 1456-1461 (2002)
© 2002 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Fas Is Involved in the p53-Dependent Apoptotic Response to Ionizing Radiation in Mouse Testis1

Michelle Embree-Kua, Deborah Venturinia, and Kim Boekelheide2,a

a Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Apoptosis induced in male germ cells following ionizing radiation is dependent on functional p53 (Trp53) being present. We sought to determine whether Fas (Tnfrsf6/CD95/APO-1), an apoptotic factor, is involved in this p53-dependent germ cell death. In p53 knock-out mice exposed to 5 Gy of x-radiation, germ cells were protected from cell death, as assessed by counting apoptotic seminiferous tubules 12 h following radiation. Similarly, spermatid head counts in p53 knock-out mice remained near normal 29 days after exposure to 0.5 Gy of radiation, whereas wild-type animals had a more than twofold reduction in spermatid head counts. Fas mRNA expression remained at pretreatment levels in p53 knock-out mice; however, Fas increased in a time-dependent manner in wild-type mice following exposure to 5 Gy of radiation, indicating that radiation-induced Fas expression is p53-dependent. The functional significance of Fas involvement was demonstrated when lprcg mice, having a nonfunctional Fas receptor, were exposed to 5 Gy of radiation; the number of apoptotic seminiferous tubules 12 h following radiation was significantly reduced compared to that of wild-type mice. Additionally, lprcg mice exposed to 0.5 Gy of radiation had increased spermatid head counts 29 days following radiation compared to wild-type mice. Interestingly, gld mice with a non-functional Fas ligand (Tnfsf6/FasL/CD95L) were as sensitive to radiation as wild-type animals, and levels of FasL mRNA were not affected by radiation treatment. These results indicate that apoptosis and up-regulation of Fas following radiation are both p53-dependent events. Although Fas is necessary, in part, for radiation-induced p53-dependent apoptosis, FasL is not.

apoptosis, gene regulation, Sertoli cells, spermatogenesis, testis


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Apoptosis, a form of controlled and highly ordered cell death, is present in the testis in proliferating germ cells, both during normal spermatogenesis as well as in response to injuries such as heat, radiation, or toxicant exposure [14]. In general, cell death can be the result of neglect, such as hormone or cytokine deprivation, or can be induced by stimuli, such as activation of DNA damage sensors or binding of extracellular receptors. As such, apoptosis is activated by molecules that can be grouped into two categories: intracellular "stress sensors," such as p53 (Trp53); or external signals via ligand binding to cell surface receptors, such as Fas (Tnfrsf6/CD95/APO-1). Whether cell death is initiated by an intracellular sensor or by an extracellular signal depends on the tissue type, the stage of development of the target cell, and the source of the insult. How intracellular and extracellular sensory systems are integrated, however, is not well understood. Using radiation-induced injury to investigate the consequences of DNA damage-induced apoptosis, we examined the nature of the interaction between an intracellular sensor activated in response to DNA damage (p53) and a receptor traditionally thought of as an extracellular sensor (Fas).

Exposure of testes to ionizing radiation efficiently induces apoptosis of germ cells, with the actively dividing spermatogonia being the most susceptible, followed by stem cell spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and the highly resistant spermatids (for a summary of relevant work, see [5]). Germ cell death resulting from radiation occurs via apoptosis [3, 6]. On the other hand, the supportive, nondividing Sertoli cells are highly resistant to radiation. Although p53 is necessary for radiation-induced germ cell death [7], the downstream events following p53 activation in testis have not been explored. The Fas system is one of several pathways that have been implicated in p53-dependent cell death.

Fas is a cell surface receptor that, on ligand binding (Tnfsf6/FasL/CD95L), activates rapid apoptosis via a caspase cascade initiated by caspase 8. Most of what is known regarding Fas comes from the immune system, because Fas/FasL interactions play a clear role in thymic cell deletion, natural killer cell and activated T-cell function, and peripheral T-cell deletion. Although it is accepted that the Fas system is also present in the testis, the roles that it plays in this tissue are not as well defined. Fas/FasL interactions are proposed to be important in maintaining the immune-privilege status of the testis [8], in germ cell development [9], in spermatozoal survival in the female genital tract [10], and in responses to injury [11, 12]. Fas receptor has been localized to the germ cells, whereas FasL expression has been localized to the Sertoli cells [9, 12].

The nature of the interaction between p53 and Fas in the execution of cell death remains elusive. However, evidence suggests that Fas is activated downstream of p53 both by transcriptional up-regulation and by regulation at the protein level. Fas mRNA is up-regulated in many cell types following p53 induction [1315], and in vitro, both mouse and human Fas induction are dependent on a p53-response element in the first intron [16]. Additionally, evidence for p53 regulation of Fas at the protein level comes from experiments demonstrating that p53 induction leads to trafficking of Fas from preformed pools in the Golgi apparatus [17].

Most of the work defining p53 and Fas/FasL interactions has been performed in vitro and has involved cells from the immune system. The role of Fas in the response to radiation has been defined by studies in tumor cells and hematopoietic cell types [13, 18, 19]. However, to our knowledge, the role of Fas in radiation-induced testicular germ cell apoptosis has not been examined previously. Here, using an in vivo system, the possibility that Fas is involved in p53-dependent germ cell death is explored.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Mice of a mixed background were bred and maintained in an in-house colony. The colony was derived from an initial stock of five p53-/- male mice (C57BL/6J-Trp53tm1Tyj) and 15 gld female mice (B6Smn.C3H-Tnfsf6gld) from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All B6 wild-type, p53-/-, and gld mice were derived from crosses of the F1 offspring. Genotyping was done using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by restriction digestion. Lprcg (CBA/KlJms-Tnfrsf6lpr-cg) and control CBA (CBA/J) mice were ordered from The Jackson Laboratory and were acclimated in-house for 1 wk before treatment. All mice were 8 wk old at the time of radiation exposure. Animals were housed in humidity (30%–70%)- and temperature (74 ± 2°F)-controlled rooms and maintained on a 12L:12D photoperiod. Animals had access to Purina Rodent Chow 5001 (Farmers Exchange, Framingham, MA) and water ad libitum. All procedures involving animals were performed in accordance with the National Research Council's Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the guidelines of Brown University's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Genotyping

The DNA was isolated from tail tips, which were collected from 21- to 28-day-old mice while the mice were anesthetized with Metophane (inhalation) (Schering-Plough, Union, NJ). Template DNA (25 ng) was used for a 50-µl multiplex PCR reaction containing 200 µM dNTPs (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD), 1x PCR buffer (Perkin Elmer, Branschburg, NJ), 6 mM MgCl2 (Perkin Elmer), 0.05 U/µl of AmpliTaq Gold (Perkin Elmer), 0.2 µM of each FasL primer (5'-ATAGGTCTTAAGAAGACTCTCATTCAAG-3' and 5'-TGATCAATTTTGAGGAATCTAAGGCC-3'), 0.2 µM of each neomycin-resistance primer (5'-AGGTGAGATGACAGGAGATC-3' and 5'-CTTGGGTGGAGAGGCTATTC-3'), and 0.2 µM of p53 primer (5'-GCGTCTTAGAGACAGTTGACT-3', and 5'-GGATAGGTCGGCGGTTCATGC-3') in a Perkin Elmer 2400 Thermocycler as follows: 95°C for 10 min; followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 30 sec; and ending with 72°C for 5 min. To identify the presence or absence of the FasL mutation in gld mice, a restriction digest was performed using 15 µl of the PCR product, 1 µl of StuI (Gibco), and 0.5 µl of 1 M NaCl2. The samples were incubated for 3 h at 37°C, followed by 10 min at 65°C. The resulting product was separated on a 2.5% (w/v) agarose gel, and the presence or absence of bands at 112, 136, 278, and 458 base pairs (bp) indicated the presence of a wild-type FasL allele, a gld mutant FasL allele, a p53 knock-out allele, and a p53 wild-type allele, respectively.

Irradiation and Experimental Outline

Unanesthetized, 8-wk-old male mice were exposed to radiation with single doses of 0.5 or 5.0 Gy at a rate of 1.01–1.67 Gy/min using a Philips 250-kVp x-ray machine. Dose rate was calculated using a Victoreen probe. Animals were restrained in polystyrene chambers, and the upper two-thirds of the body were shielded with 3 mm of lead. At designated time points, animals were killed by CO2 asphyxiation, and testes were excised immediately. In animals dosed with 0.5 Gy of radiation, both testes were flash-frozen and stored at -80°C until analysis for spermatid head counts. For animals dosed with 5 Gy of radiation, the right testis was flash-frozen for RNA analysis, and the left testis was flash-frozen in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. Compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA) for cryosectioning and in situ TUNEL staining. Frozen samples were stored at -80°C until analysis.

Semiquantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR

The RNA was extracted from frozen whole testes using the Tri reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH). First-strand cDNA was made using 1 µg of total RNA in the presence of Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Gibco/BRL) and random hexamers. The reverse-transcribed mixture (1 µl) was used as template for subsequent PCR reactions. A previously described method of semiquantitative PCR [20] was used to monitor mRNA expression of Fas and FasL. Briefly, PCR products of mouse Fas (331 bp), FasL (166 bp), and ß-actin (429 bp) were amplified using primers for Fas (5'-GAGAATTGCTGAAGACATGACAATCC-3' and 5'-ATGGCTGGAACTGAGGTAGTTTTCAC-3'), FasL (5'-TTATATGTCAACATATCTCAACTCTCTCTG-3' and 5'-ATAGGTCTTAAGAAGACTCTCATTCAAG-3'), and ß-actin (5'-AGGAATCCTGACCCTGAAGTACC-3', and 5'-AGCTGTGGTGGTGAAGCTGTAGC-3'). To test for the presence of any contaminating DNA, negative-control reactions, without reverse transcriptase, were run concomitantly with cDNA samples. For quantitative analysis, ß-actin was coamplified in each reaction as an internal control. The PCR products (10 µl) were collected during each cycle between cycles 25 and 32 (Fas) or cycles 27 and 34 (FasL) and were run out on a 2.5% (w/v) agarose gel. The image of the gel was captured on a Gel Doc 2000 using accompanying Quantity 1 version 4.0.1 software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and the intensity of ethidium bromide staining of the bands was analyzed using NIH Image (Bethesda, MD). The relative ratio of Fas or FasL to ß-actin was calculated from cycles in which the amplification of both PCR products was exponential. Data were normalized to the within-run, wild-type, 0-h time point to account for potential differences in PCR master mix preparations or reverse transcription reactions from day to day.

Detection of Apoptosis

Germ cell apoptosis was detected in 8-µm cryosections from frozen testes by TUNEL staining using ApopTag kits (Intergen, Purchase, NY). Tissue was counterstained with methyl green. Each tissue section was examined for TUNEL-positive cells, and the apoptotic index was determined by the ratio of the number of essentially round seminiferous tubules with more than 3 TUNEL-positive cells relative to the total number of essentially round tubules. For each testis section, 100–200 seminiferous tubules were counted.

Low Molecular Weight DNA Isolation

The presence of a low molecular weight ladder was used to verify that radiation-induced cell death was apoptosis. Twelve hours after exposure to 5 Gy radiation, testes were decapsulated, washed in Eagle media, and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Frozen tissue was homogenized in homogenization buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM EDTA, and 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100, pH 8) in a Dounce homogenizer and incubated with diethyl pyrocarbonate for 10 min. The homogenate was centrifuged at 16 000 x g at 4°C for 40 min. The supernatent was incubated with 0.5 mg/ml of proteinase K at 37°C for 1 h and extracted with an equal volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1; v/v/v). The aqueous phase was ethanol-precipitated overnight, pelleted, and resuspended in TE buffer (pH 8) containing 10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA. The resulting DNA was digested with RNase free of DNase at 37°C for 1 h and was extracted. The aqueous phase was ethanol-precipitated overnight with 20 µg/ml of glycogen, pelleted, and resuspended in TE buffer. A total of 3 µg of DNA were loaded on a 2% (w/v) agarose gel and separated by electrophoresis. The DNA was stained with ethidium bromide and visualized with an ultraviolet transilluminator. The sizes of the resulting DNA bands were estimated by comparison with a standard 100-bp ladder.

Spermatid Head Counts

Testes obtained 29 days after irradiation and from unirradiated controls were stored at -80°C until analysis. Both testes from each animal were homogenized separately, and sperm heads were counted on a hemocytometer using previously described methods [21]. The counts from the two testes of each animal were averaged for statistical analysis.

Statistics

The mean and SEM were calculated for each data point and are presented in the figures. The apoptotic index and spermatid head counts were analyzed by ANOVA followed by a Fisher protected least significant difference test using Statview 4.0 statistical software (SAS, Cary, NC). Fas and FasL mRNA expression were analyzed with cross-sectional time-series analysis with a generalized estimating equation using STATA 7.0 statistical software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Apoptotic Response Following Exposure to 5 Gy of X-radiation

In mice, genetic background can significantly alter the germ cell response to radiation [22]. Therefore, to verify that our mice, from a mixed genetic background, responded to radiation similarly to those in previous reports, B6 wild-type and p53 knock-out mice were exposed to 5 Gy of x-radiation. In C57BL/6 mice, this dose is known to induce apoptosis in spermatogonia and spermatocytes [6], and the absence of p53 protects germ cells from radiation-induced apoptosis [7]. Animals were killed at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 h following radiation to evaluate TUNEL-labeled cells (Fig. 1, a and b). Apoptosis, as assessed by counting seminiferous tubules with more than three apoptotic cells, was increased at 9 and 12 h following radiation in B6 wild-type, but not p53 knock-out, testes (Fig. 1c). Apoptosis was verified by the display of a low molecular weight DNA laddering in B6 wild-type, but not p53 knock-out, mouse testes 12 h following radiation (Fig. 1d). Gld mice, deficient in FasL, also showed a low molecular weight DNA laddering in response to radiation (Fig. 1d); the apoptotic response of gld mice to radiation injury is defined further below.



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Apoptosis in mouse testes following 5 Gy of radiation. a and b) TUNEL staining (arrows) 12 h following radiation was greater in wild-type (a) compared to p53 knock-out (b) mouse testes. c) Time course of radiation-induced apoptosis in B6 wild-type (solid line, {blacktriangleup}) versus p53 knock-out (dashed line, •) mice (n = 1 animal/time point/genotype). d) Low molecular weight DNA isolated 12 h post-dose from p53 knock-out, gld, or B6 wild-type mouse testes unexposed (0 Gy) or exposed (5 Gy) to radiation. Each lane represents DNA isolated from a single testis. Standard lane represents 100-bp ladder

Based on these results and those of previous studies [7], the 12-h time point was chosen to quantitate apoptosis after exposure to 5 Gy of x-radiation. The number of apoptotic seminiferous tubules increased significantly in B6 wild-type animals 12 h following radiation, whereas apoptosis in p53 knock-out testes remained near normal, verifying that radiation-induced germ cell apoptosis is p53-dependent in these mice (mean apoptotic index ± SEM was 0.53 ± 0.063 in wild-type mice and 0.04 ± 0.021 in p53 knock-out mice; n = 4 mice/genotype; P < 0.01 by ANOVA and Fisher protected least significant difference test).

Survival and Differentiation of A1 to B Spermatogonia Following Exposure to 0.5 Gy of X-Radiation

To examine the ability of A1 through B spermatogonia to survive and differentiate into late spermatids, homogenization-resistant spermatid head counts were evaluated 29 days after 0.5 Gy of x-radiation. Historical control data from the p53 knock-out and B6 wild-type male mice from our lab, as well as data from a previously published report [7], indicate that spermatid head counts in p53 knock-out and B6 wild-type testes are similar and range from 17.5 to 20 million sperm per testis. Consistent with the analysis at 12 h after exposure to 5 Gy of x-radiation, B6 wild-type mice showed an approximately 60% reduction in numbers of spermatid heads per testis, whereas p53-deficient mice had near-normal levels of spermatid heads (Fig. 2).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Spermatid head count 29 days following exposure to 0.5 Gy of radiation. B6 wild-type, n = 8; p53 knock-out, n = 7; *P < 0.05 by ANOVA and Fisher protected least significant difference test

Fas/FasL Expression Following Exposure to 5 Gy of X-Radiation

To examine whether Fas is an apoptotic mechanism induced by p53, Fas expression was examined using semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Fas mRNA was increased 3 h after exposure to 5 Gy of x-radiation (Fig. 3a). This increase in Fas mRNA was p53-dependent, indicating that increased Fas expression is downstream of p53 and might be part of the p53-dependent apoptosis that occurs following radiation. Interestingly, FasL expression, as determined by reverse transcription-PCR, remained unchanged following radiation (Fig. 3b). The levels of Fas and FasL mRNA were also measured in the testes of gld mice (n = 1 animal/time point) following radiation, and similar to B6 wild-type mice, an increase in Fas, but not in FasL, expression was observed following radiation (data not shown).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Relative expression of Fas and FasL mRNA following exposure to 5 Gy of radiation. a) Semiquantitative analysis of Fas relative to ß-actin mRNA expression, using a reverse transcription-PCR assay, shows increased Fas expression peaking 3 h following radiation in B6 wild-type (solid line, {blacktriangleup}), but not in p53 knock-out (dashed line, •), mice. b) Similar analysis of FasL mRNA expression shows no change in FasL expression. 0 h, n = 4 mice/genotype; 3, 6, and 12 h, n = 3 mice/genotype; 9 h, n = 2 mice/genotype; c) Representative gel used for the reverse transcription-PCR assay showing PCR product for Fas (331 bp) and ß-actin (429 bp). The relative ratio of Fas to ß-actin was determined from the cycles in which both PCR products were exponentially increasing relative to the previous cycle (indicated by arrows). In this case, the ratios from the two cycles were averaged to obtain one value (0.72) for one animal (p53 knock-out, 12 h). *P < 0.05 by cross-sectional time-series analysis with a generalized estimating equation.

Effects of Functional Elimination of Fas or FasL on Response to Radiation

To determine the functional significance of Fas expression in the context of radiation injury, lprcg mice, having a nonfunctional Fas, were exposed to 5 Gy of x-radiation, and testes were examined at 12 h following radiation for apoptosis. Lprcg mice express Fas mRNA of normal size and as abundantly as wild-type mice, but the mRNA carries a point mutation that prevents Fas from transducing an apoptotic signal [23].

A dose of 5 Gy induced apoptosis in both lprcg and CBA wild-type mice (Fig. 4a). However, mice with the lprcg mutation had significantly lower levels of apoptosis at 12 h following radiation as compared to CBA wild-type controls. Lprcg mice had a 203% increase in apoptosis compared to unexposed lprcg mice, whereas CBA wild-type mice had a 428% increase in apoptosis compared to unexposed controls.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Response of lprcg mice, lacking functional Fas, to ionizing radiation. a) Apoptosis 12 h following 5 Gy of radiation was significantly decreased in lprcg mice (cross-hatched bar) relative to CBA wild-type mice (open bar). 0 Gy, n = 3 mice/genotype; 5 Gy, 7 mice/genotype; groups sharing the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 by ANOVA and Fisher protected least significant difference test. b) Spermatid head counts per testis were assessed 29 days following exposure to 0.5 Gy of radiation to determine the effects of radiation on A1 to B spermatogonia. 0 Gy CBA wild-type, n = 7; 0 Gy lprcg, n = 5; 0.5 Gy CBA wild-type, n = 9; 0.5 Gy lprcg, n = 7; groups sharing the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 by ANOVA and Fisher protected least significant difference test; error bars = SEM

Spermatid head counts from testes 29 days after exposure to 0.5 Gy were consistent with the effects on apoptosis (Fig. 4b). Spermatid head counts were significantly higher in lprcg mice exposed to 0.5 Gy of radiation when compared to treated CBA wild-type mice. Spermatid head counts in CBA wild-type mice were reduced by 72% after exposure to 0.5 Gy of radiation, whereas spermatid head counts were reduced by 56% in lprcg mice.

Interestingly, when gld mice, containing a point mutation in FasL, were exposed to 5 Gy of x-radiation, apoptosis was induced to levels similar to those of treated B6 wild-type animals (Fig. 5a). Similarly, when gld mice were exposed to 0.5 Gy of radiation, spermatid head counts were reduced to levels equivalent to those of treated B6 wild-type mice (Fig. 5b).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Response of gld mice, lacking functional FasL, to 0.5 and 5 Gy of radiation. a) Apoptosis 12 h following 5 Gy of radiation was no different in gld mice compared to B6 wild-type mice. Wild-type, n = 8; gld, n = 4. b) Spermatid head counts per testis 29 days following exposure to 0.5 Gy of radiation showed no difference in gld mice compared to B6 wild-type mice. Wild-type, n = 16; gld, n = 10. Significance testing by ANOVA and Fisher protected least significant difference test; error bars = SEM


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Apoptosis induced in germ cells by ionizing radiation is largely p53-dependent. In mice lacking functional p53, not only do germ cells survive exposure to 5 Gy of radiation, but spermatogonia are able to proliferate and differentiate following a dose of 0.5 Gy. Given that p53 is a transcriptional activator and repressor for many apoptotic genes, a goal of this study was to determine whether Fas is one of the important p53-regulated genes in the testicular germ cell response to injury.

Fas, a receptor that induces apoptosis on activation, was transcriptionally up-regulated following ionizing radiation, and this increase was dependent on the presence of functional p53. Consistent with functional significance of the up-regulation of Fas was the timing of the increase (3 h following radiation) relative to the timing of apoptosis (9–12 h following radiation). Germ cells in lprcg mice, lacking functional Fas, were partially resistant to ionizing radiation. However, this resistance was not as extensive as that when p53 was eliminated.

The up-regulation of Fas mRNA in a timely manner, the dependence of Fas expression on the presence of p53, and the protection conferred by a mutation in Fas all suggest that Fas plays an important role in the radiation response. However, the lack of full protection against radiation in the lprcg mouse indicates that Fas may be one of several apoptotic mechanisms induced by p53 and that, in the absence of Fas, other pathways still induce some apoptosis.

Interestingly, germ cells of gld mice, having a nonfunctional FasL, were sensitive to radiation-induced apoptosis, whereas lprcg mice, with a nonfunctional Fas, were somewhat protected from radiation. These results indicate that, although Fas is important in the apoptotic response to radiation, the presence of FasL is not necessary. Mechanisms to explain these observed differences include that Fas is activated in response to radiation in the absence of a ligand or that an alternate ligand to FasL exists. Previous reports have shown that Fas can be activated directly by ultraviolet radiation in the absence of ligand [24]. Additionally, evidence suggests that Fas may be activated by tumor necrosis factor {alpha} (TNF{alpha}) in the absence of FasL [25]. Given that macrophages increase TNF{alpha} in response to radiation [26], it is possible that resident macrophages secrete enough TNF{alpha} to activate Fas. Alternatively, small amounts of TNF{alpha} have been found to be expressed in round spermatids and pachytene spermatocytes in adult mouse testis [27]. Exposure to radiation might induce higher expression of TNF{alpha} in spermatids and spermatocytes—high enough to engage Fas on germ cells. Interestingly, prolonged exposure to high levels of TNF{alpha} induces cell death in both spermatocytes and spermatids [28].

Differences in the strains of mice also may have contributed to different responses to radiation, because the gld mice were of a mixed B6 background and the lprcg mice were of a CBA background. Variation in modifying proteins or even transcription factors in the strains of mice (C57BL/6 vs. CBA) could allow an effect to be observed in one strain and not the other. Alternatively, a polymorphism in Fas or FasL could lead to differences in the role of Fas/FasL interactions depending on background. Regardless of the explanation for the differences seen between gld and lprcg mice, the data are consistent with Fas involvement in the response to radiation.

These observations, in fact, are consistent with a model in which germ cells, but not Sertoli cells, are the target of radiation injury. Spermatogonia and early pachytene spermatocytes up-regulate p53 within 3 h following radiation [29, 30] and undergo apoptosis by a p53-dependent mechanism [7]. Given this cell specific up-regulation of p53 and the data indicating that Fas can be up-regulated by p53 in other systems [1317], it is not unreasonable to imagine that Fas, although normally expressed by spermatocytes [9], would be up-regulated by p53 in spermatogonia and early pachytene spermatocytes following radiation injury. Indeed, that the lprcg mice showed partial resistance to radiation 29 days following radiation indicates that Fas plays a role in spermatogonial apoptosis, because this is the population affected by the low dose (0.5 Gy) of radiation and that develops into elongate spermatids 29 days following radiation. So, although Fas is expressed on spermatocytes during normal homeostasis [9], Fas likely is induced in spermatogonia following radiation. On the other hand, Sertoli cells constitutively express a low level of FasL, presumably as part of a mechanism to eliminate excess germ cells from the seminiferous epithelium [9]. Our data indicate that the levels of FasL expression are not altered following radiation, and that FasL is not necessary for apoptosis following radiation injury.

Thus, we propose a model in which radiation induces DNA damage within the proliferating spermatogonia and spermatocytes, and in which p53, an intracellularly activated apoptotic protein, is stabilized within germ cells in response to the injury. This, in turn, leads to increased transcription of Fas within the germ cells. Fas expression on cells that do not normally express Fas (spermatogonia) or increased expression on cells that normally express Fas at low levels increases the susceptibility of the germ cells to apoptosis, whether it be through binding of constitutively expressed FasL or of an alternate ligand. Although Fas is traditionally thought of as a receptor for extracellularly activated apoptosis, in this model Fas serves to enhance an intracellularly activated pathway.

Although categorizing pathways into intracellularly versus extracellularly activated makes them easier to understand conceptually, these two categories may not be mutually exclusive, and pathways that traditionally are thought of as being activated by extracellular signals may, in fact, be integrated into the pathways that are activated by intracellular sensors. In the apoptotic response to radiation in testis, we found that p53, an intracellular sensor, induced Fas expression, which is traditionally thought of as an extracellular sensor, and that FasL was not necessary for the induction of apoptosis. Whereas a mutant Fas receptor protected germ cells from radiation-induced cell death, a mutant Fas ligand had no effect, indicating that the Fas-expressing germ cells are able to activate the Fas system in the absence of FasL. This suggests that the Fas system should not be considered as exclusively part of the extracellular sensory pathway.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We wish to thank Tom King and Charles Vaslet for their advice in developing a multiplex PCR approach to genotyping mice and Theresa Allio for her help in the statistical analyses.


    FOOTNOTES
 
First decision: 4 October 2001.

1 Supported in part by NIEHS grant RO1-ES05033 and by the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. Back

2 Correspondence: Kim Boekelheide, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Box G-B5, 171 Meeting Street, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912. FAX: 401 863 9008; kim_boekelheide{at}brown.edu Back

Accepted: December 10, 2001.

Received: September 7, 2001.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Yin Y, Hawkins KL, DeWolf WC, Morgentaler A. Heat stress causes testicular germ cell apoptosis in adult mice. J Androl 1997; 18:159-165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Shikone T, Billig H, Hsueh AJ. Experimentally induced cryptorchidism increases apoptosis in rat testis. Biol Reprod 1994; 51:865-872[Abstract]
  3. Allan DJ, Gobe GC, Harmon BV. Cell death in spermatogenesis. In: Potter CS (ed.), Perspectives on Mammalian Cell Death. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987: 229–258
  4. Ku WW, Wine RN, Chae BY, Ghanayem BI, Chapin RE. Spermatocyte toxicity of 2-methoxyethanol (ME) in rats and guinea pigs: evidence for the induction of apoptosis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1995; 134:100-110[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Meistrich ML, Hunter NR, Suzuki N, Trostle PK, Withers HR. Gradual regeneration of mouse testicular stem cells after exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 1978; 74:349-362[Medline]
  6. Hasegawa M, Wilson G, Russell LD, Meistrich ML. Radiation-induced cell death in the mouse testis: relationship to apoptosis. Radiat Res 1997; 147:457-467[Medline]
  7. Hasegawa M, Zhang Y, Niibe H, Terry NH, Meistrich ML. Resistance of differentiating spermatogonia to radiation-induced apoptosis and loss in p53-deficient mice. Radiat Res 1998; 149:263-270[Medline]
  8. Bellgrau D, Gold D, Selawry H, Moore J, Franzusoff A, Duke RC. A role for CD95 ligand in preventing graft rejection. Nature 1995; 377:630-632[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Lee J, Richburg JH, Younkin SC, Boekelheide K. The Fas system is a key regulator of germ cell apoptosis in the testis. Endocrinology 1997; 138:2081-2088[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. D'Alessio A, Riccioli A, Lauretti P, Padula F, Muciaccia B, De Cesaris P, Filippini A, Nagata S, Ziparo E. Testicular FasL is expressed by sperm cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:3316-3321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lee J, Richburg JH, Shipp EB, Meistrich ML, Boekelheide K. The Fas system, a regulator of testicular germ cell apoptosis, is differentially up-regulated in Sertoli cell versus germ cell injury of the testis. Endocrinology 1999; 140:852-858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Koji T, Hishikawa Y, Ando H, Nakanishi Y, Kobayashi N. Expression of Fas and Fas ligand in normal and ischemia-reperfusion testes: involvement of the Fas system in the induction of germ cell apoptosis in the damaged mouse testis. Biol Reprod 2001; 64:946-954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Sheard MA, Vojtesek B, Janakova L, Kovarik J, Zaloudik J. Up-regulation of Fas (CD95) in human p53 wild-type cancer cells treated with ionizing radiation. Int J Cancer 1997; 73:757-762[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Petak I, Tillman DM, Houghton JA. p53 Dependence of Fas induction and acute apoptosis in response to 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin in human colon carcinoma cell lines. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6:4432-4441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Muller M, Wilder S, Bannasch D, Israeli D, Lehlbach K, Li-Weber M, Friedman SL, Galle PR, Stremmel W, Oren M, Krammer PH. p53 Activates the CD95 (APO-1/Fas) gene in response to DNA damage by anticancer drugs. J Exp Med 1998; 188:2033-2045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Munsch D, Watanabe-Fukunaga R, Bourdon JC, Nagata S, May E, Yonish-Rouach E, Reisdorf P. Human and mouse Fas (APO-1/CD95) death receptor genes each contain a p53-responsive element that is activated by p53 mutants unable to induce apoptosis. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:3867-3872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Bennett M, Macdonald K, Chan SW, Luzio JP, Simari R, Weissberg P. Cell surface trafficking of Fas: a rapid mechanism of p53-mediated apoptosis. Science 1998; 282:290-293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Reap EA, Roof K, Maynor K, Borrero M, Booker J, Cohen PL. Radiation and stress-induced apoptosis: a role for Fas/Fas ligand interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:5750-5755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gutierrezdel Arroyo A, Gil-Lamagniere C, Lazaro I, de Marco MC, Layunta I, Silva A. Involvement of p53 and interleukin 3 in the up-regulation of CD95 (APO-1/Fas) by x-ray irradiation. Oncogene 2000; 19:3647-3655[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Wong H, Anderson WD, Cheng T, Riabowol KT. Monitoring mRNA expression by polymerase chain reaction: the "primer-dropping" method. Anal Biochem 1994; 223:251-258[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Meistrich ML, van Beek MEAB. Spermatogonial stem cells: assessing their survival and ability to produce differentiated cells. In: Chapin RE, Heindel J (eds.), Methods in Toxicology, vol. 3A. New York: Academic Press; 1993: 106–123
  22. Bianchi M, Delic JI, Hurtado-de-Catalfo G, Hendry JH. Strain differences in the radiosensitivity of mouse spermatogonia. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 1985; 48:579-588[Medline]
  23. Watanabe-Fukunaga R, Brannan CI, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Nagata S. Lymphoproliferation disorder in mice explained by defects in Fas antigen that mediates apoptosis. Nature 1992; 356:314-317[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Aragane Y, Kulms D, Metze D, Wilkes G, Poppelmann B, Luger TA, Schwarz T. Ultraviolet light induces apoptosis via direct activation of CD95 (Fas/APO-1) independently of its ligand CD95L. J Cell Biol 1998; 140:171-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Suzuki A, Tsutomi Y, Shimizu M, Matsuzawa , Another cell death induction system: TNF{alpha} acts as a ligand for Fas in vaginal cells. Cell Death Differ 1999; 6:638-643[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Iwamoto KS, McBride WH. Production of 13-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid and tumor necrosis factor {alpha} by murine peritoneal macrophages in response to irradiation. Radiat Res 1994; 139:103-108[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. De SK, Chen HL, Pace JL, Hunt JS, Terranova PF, Enders GC. Expression of tumor necrosis factor {alpha} in mouse spermatogenic cells. Endocrinology 1993; 133:389-396[Abstract]
  28. Mealy K, Robinson B, Millette CF, Majzoub J, Wilmore DW. The testicular effects of tumor necrosis factor. Ann Surg 1990; 211:470-475[Medline]
  29. Sjoblom T, Lahdetie J. Expression of p53 in normal and gamma-irradiated rat testis suggests a role for p53 in meiotic recombination and repair. Oncogene 1996; 12:2499-2505[Medline]
  30. Beumer TL, Roepers-Gajadien HL, Gademan IS, van Buul PP, Gil-Gomez G, Rutgers DH, de Rooij DG. The role of the tumor suppressor p53 in spermatogenesis. Cell Death Differ 1998; 5:669-677[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Shetty, S. H. Shao, and C. C. Y. Weng
p53-Dependent Apoptosis in the Inhibition of Spermatogonial Differentiation in Juvenile Spermatogonial Depletion (Utp14bjsd) Mice
Endocrinology, June 1, 2008; 149(6): 2773 - 2781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
J. S. Moffit, K. Boekelheide, J. M. Sedivy, and J. Klysik
Mice Lacking Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein-1 (RKIP-1) Have Altered Sperm Capacitation and Reduced Reproduction Rates With a Normal Response to Testicular Injury
J Androl, November 1, 2007; 28(6): 883 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Wang, S. Wang, H. Maeng, D. P. Young, O. Prakash, L. E. Fayad, A. Younes, and F. Samaniego
K1 protein of human herpesvirus 8 suppresses lymphoma cell Fas-mediated apoptosis
Blood, March 1, 2007; 109(5): 2174 - 2182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. J. Rasoulpour and K. Boekelheide
NF-kappaB Activation Elicited by Ionizing Radiation Is Proapoptotic in Testis
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2007; 76(2): 279 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. Rasoulpour, K. DiPalma, B. Kolvek, and M. Hixon
Akt1 Suppresses Radiation-Induced Germ Cell Apoptosis in Vivo
Endocrinology, September 1, 2006; 147(9): 4213 - 4221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Chandrasekaran, C. M. Mckee, Y. Ye, and J. H. Richburg
Influence of TRP53 Status on FAS Membrane Localization, CFLAR (c-FLIP) Ubiquitinylation, and Sensitivity of GC-2spd (ts) Cells to Undergo FAS-Mediated Apoptosis
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2006; 74(3): 560 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
R. G. Azrak, J. Yu, L. Pendyala, P. F. Smith, S. Cao, X. Li, W. D. Shannon, F. A. Durrani, H. L. McLeod, and Y. M. Rustum
Irinotecan pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic alterations induced by methylselenocysteine in human head and neck xenograft tumors
Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2005; 4(5): 843 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
K. Boekelheide
Mechanisms of Toxic Damage to Spermatogenesis
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, March 1, 2005; 2005(34): 6 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Chandrasekaran and J. H. Richburg
The p53 Protein Influences the Sensitivity of Testicular Germ Cells to Mono-(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate-Induced Apoptosis by Increasing the Membrane Levels of Fas and DR5 and Decreasing the Intracellular Amount of c-FLIP
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2005; 72(1): 206 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
R. J. Rasoulpour, H. A. Schoenfeld, D. A. Gray, and K. Boekelheide
Expression of a K48R Mutant Ubiquitin Protects Mouse Testis from Cryptorchid Injury and Aging
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2003; 163(6): 2595 - 2603.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. A. Sheard, S. Uldrijan, and B. Vojtesek
Role of p53 in Regulating Constitutive and X-Radiation-Inducible CD95 Expression and Function in Carcinoma Cells
Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 63(21): 7176 - 7184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
K.-Y. Jen and V. G. Cheung
Transcriptional Response of Lymphoblastoid Cells to Ionizing Radiation
Genome Res., September 1, 2003; 13(9): 2092 - 2100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
M. Embree-Ku and K. Boekelheide
FasL Deficiency Enhances the Development of Tumors in p53+/- Mice
Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2002; 30(6): 705 - 713.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Embree-Ku, M.
Right arrow Articles by Boekelheide, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Embree-Ku, M.
Right arrow Articles by Boekelheide, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Embree-Ku, M.
Right arrow Articles by Boekelheide, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS