Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koo, D.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koo, D.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koo, D.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Biology of Reproduction 67, 487-492 (2002)
© 2002 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Aberrant Allocations of Inner Cell Mass and Trophectoderm Cells in Bovine Nuclear Transfer Blastocysts1

Deog-Bon Kooa, Yong-Kook Kanga, Young-Hee Choia, Jung Sun Parka, Ha-Na Kima, Keon Bong Oha, Dong-Soo Sonb, Humdai Parkc, Kyung-Kwang Leea, and Yong-Mahn Han2,,a

a Animal Developmental Biotechnology Laboratory, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yusong, Daejeon 305-600, Korea b National Livestock Research Institute, Chonan 330-800, Korea c Department of Biotechnology, Taegu University, Kyungsan 712-714, Korea


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Abortions of nuclear transfer (NT) embryos are mainly due to insufficient placentation. We hypothesized that the primary cause might be the aberrant allocations of two different cell lineages of the blastocyst stage embryos, the inner cell mass (ICM) and the trophectoderm (TE) cells. The potential for development of NT embryos to blastocysts was similar to that for in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos. No difference in the total cell number was detected between NT and IVF blastocysts, but both types of embryos had fewer total cells than did in vivo-derived embryos (P < 0.05). The NT blastocysts showed a higher ratio of ICM:total cells than did IVF or in vivo-derived embryos (P < 0.05). Individual blastocysts were assigned to four subgroups (I: <20%, II: 20–40%, III: 40–60%, IV: >60%) according to the ratio of ICM:total cells. Most NT blastocysts were placed in groups III and IV, whereas most IVF and in vivo-derived blastocysts were distributed in group II. Our findings suggest that placental abnormalities or early fetal losses in the present cloning system may be due to aberrant allocations of NT embryos to the ICM and TE cells during early development.

developmental biology, early development, embryo, implantation, trophoblast


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The overall efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT) in cloning animals is very low [13]. High embryonic losses during early gestation have been reported in the clones derived from fetal fibroblasts [2, 46], adult mural granulosa cells [3], and adult ear skin fibroblasts [7]. Incomplete reprogramming of the donor genome may be responsible for early developmental failures of NT embryos in the present cloning scheme. Recently, we demonstrated that bovine NT embryos closely resembled donor cells in their overall genomic methylation status, which was quite different from that of normal embryos produced in vitro or in vivo [8]. These results provide indirect evidence that the developmental failures of NT embryos may be due to the inefficient epigenetic reprogramming of donor genomic DNA. In addition to the epigenetic aspect, the structural composition of NT embryos should be also considered as another factor responsible for the developmental obstacles. Abnormal placentation, which may be associated with the structural integrity of the blastocysts, was previously suggested to be a factor causing the early fetal losses of NT embryos [9, 10]. In mammals, embryonic cells differentiate functionally, leading to the segregation of trophectoderm (TE) cells and inner cell mass (ICM) cells. The ICM cells contribute to all embryonic tissues and are a part of the extraembryonic membranes. Later in pregnancy, the TE cells combine with the ICM-derived extraembryonic membranes to form the fetal placenta [11]. Both cell lineages are vital and essential for embryonic and fetal survival [12].

This study was performed to address the hypothesis that disproportionate allocations of ICM and TE lineages in embryos result in fetal losses during subsequent postimplantation development. In general, mean ratios of ICM:total cells for bovine blastocysts produced in vitro or in vivo range from 20% to 40% [1315]. Until now, little information has been available concerning the structural composition of ICM and TE cells in NT bovine embryos, besides previous studies with in vitro fertilization (IVF) and in vivo embryos in the cow [14, 16, 17]. Thus, we examined number and relative proportions of the ICM and TE cells in NT embryos and compared these values with those in normally fertilized counterparts.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Culture Media

Unless otherwise mentioned, all chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). The bovine oocyte maturation medium consisted of TCM-199 with Eagle salts and L-glutamine supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY), 1 µg/ml estradiol, 1 µg/ml FSH-P (Schering-Plough Animal Health Corp., Kenilworth, NJ), and 25 mM NaHCO3. IVF of bovine oocytes was performed as described by Han et al. [18]. The medium, Fert-TALP [19], consisted of bicarbonate buffered Tyrode solution supplemented with BSA (6 mg/ml), 25 µg/ml heparin, and 20 µM penicillamine, 10 µM hypotaurine, and 1 µM epinephrine (PHE). The culture medium for embryo development was CR1aa [20] supplemented with 1 mM glutamine and 1x Eagle essential amino acids solution (Gibco BRL).

In Vitro Maturation and IVF of Bovine Oocytes

Immature bovine oocytes obtained from the ovaries of slaughtered Holstein cows were cultured in 0.5 ml of maturation medium containing 1 µg/ml estradiol and 1 µg/ml FSH-P for 22 h at 38.57°C in 5% CO2 in humidified air. After in vitro maturation, the oocytes were fertilized with frozen-thawed sperm at a concentration of 2 x 106 spermatazoa/ml in 50 µl of fertilization medium. When sperm were added to the fertilization drops, 25 µg/ml heparin and PHE were also added. Sperm and oocytes were coincubated at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in air. After 20–22 h of insemination, cumulus-enclosed oocytes were stripped by gentle pipetting and then cultured in CR1aa supplemented with 3 mg/ml BSA (fatty acid free). After culture for 3 days, cleaved embryos were further cocultured in each well of a four-well culture plate containing 750 µl CR1aa (with 10% FBS) on a mouse embryonic fibroblast monolayer for 4 days at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in air [21]. After 7 days of culture, blastocyst formation was observed (7 days from IVF).

Donor Cells

Experiments were conducted according to the Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines of the National Livestock Research Institute of Korea. Bovine fetal fibroblasts were derived from a 45-day fetus and prepared as described previously [22]. The head of the fetus was removed using iris scissors, and soft tissues such as liver and intestine were also discarded by scooping out with two watchmaker's forceps. After twice washing with PBS (Gibco BRL), the carcass was minced with a surgical blade on a 100-mm culture dish. These procedures were performed at room temperature. The minced tissues were incubated in 10 ml of 0.05% (w/v) trypsin/0.53 mM EDTA solution (Gibco BRL) in an incubator at 38.5°C for 30 min. Trypsin was inactivated by adding an equal volume of cell culture medium supplemented with 10% FBS. The cell culture medium was composed of Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (Gibco BRL), 10% FBS, 1000 units of penicillin (Gibco BRL), and 1000 µg/ml of streptomycin (Gibco BRL). After vigorous pipetting, the supernatant was centrifuged at 150 x g for 5 min. The cells were suspended, adjusted to a final concentration of 2 x 106 cells/ml, and then cultured in 10 ml of the culture medium at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in air in 175-cm2 tissue culture flasks (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) until confluent. The fetal fibroblast cells were passaged three or four times before use as donor nuclei.

Somatic Cell NT

Mature oocytes were transferred to 500 µl of TL-Hepes [23] supplemented with 0.1% hyaluronidase and were freed of cumulus cells by mechanical pipetting. The zonae pellucida of oocytes were partially dissected using a fine glass needle [24]. Oocyte manipulations such as enucleation and cell injection were performed by using a micromanipulator equipped with an inverted microscope (Leitz, Ernst Leitz Wetzlar GmbH, Germany). The medium used for manipulation was TL-Hepes containing 7.5 µg/ml cytochalasin B. The first polar body and partial cytoplasm presumptively containing metaphase II chromosomes were removed together by using a micropipette with an inner diameter of 20 µm. Successful enucleation was confirmed by Hoechst 33342 staining and visualization under ultraviolet light. Single cells were individually transferred to the perivitelline space of the recipient cytoplast. The cell-cytoplast complexes were equilibrated in a 50-µl drop of cell fusion medium for 10–20 sec and then transferred to a fusion chamber with two electrodes 1 mm apart overlaid with cell fusion medium. The cell fusion medium consisted of 0.3 M mannitol, 0.5 mM Hepes, 0.01% BSA, 0.1 mM CaCl2, and 0.1 mM MgCl2. The cell-cytoplast complexes were induced to fuse with a single pulse of direct current of 1.6 kV/cm for 20 µsec each by an Electro Cell Manipulator 2001 (BTX, San Diego, CA). These procedures were performed at room temperature. Reconstructed embryos without visible somatic cells were determined as fused eggs 1 h after the fusion pulse. For activation of fused embryos, we used a modified method described by Cibelli et al. [4]. At 4 h after electrofusion, the fused eggs were activated with 5 µM ionomycin for 5 min, followed by treatment with 2.5 mM 6-dimethyl-aminopurine in CR1aa supplemented with 10% FBS for 3.5 h at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in air. Thereafter, the embryos were cultured as described above.

In Vivo-Derived Embryos

Embryos were collected from superovulated cows (n = 5) on Day 7 after artificial insemination. The superovulation regime consisted of intramuscular injection of 400 mg NIH-FSH-P1 Follotropin-V (Vetrepharm Canada Inc., London, ON, Canada) administered on Day 11 of the estrous cycle followed by 25 mg injection (48 h apart) of prostaglandin F2{alpha}. Artificial insemination with frozen-thawed semen was performed twice at 12 h and 24 h after the onset of estrus. Morulae and blastocysts were nonsurgically flushed from the uterus of the cow using a Foley catheter (Agtech, Manhattan, KS).

Differential Staining

Differential staining of ICM and TE cells of blastocysts (Day 7) was performed [25]. The zona pellucida of each blastocyst was removed by incubating in 0.5% pronase solution for 1 min. After rinsing in TL-Hepes medium containing 1 mg/ml polyvinyl alcohol, denuded embryos were exposed to a 1:5 dilution of rabbit anti-pig whole serum for 1 h, rinsed three times for 5 min each in TL-Hepes, and placed into a 1:5 dilution of guinea pig complement containing 10 µg/ml propidium iodide and 10 µg/ml bisbenzimide (Hochest 33342) for 1 h. After briefly rinsing in TL-Hepes, the embryos were mounted on slides under coverslips and examined under ultraviolet light using an epifluorescent microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Blue and red colors were designated as ICM and TE cells, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Four or five replicates for each experiment were conducted. All percentage data were subjected to arcsine transformation. All percentage data and data sets obtained from this study were expressed as mean plusmn; SD. Differences in developmental rate and cell numbers of the embryos between experimental groups were analyzed by a Student t-test and a Duncan multiple range test using the general linear models procedure of the Statistical Analysis System (Cary, NC). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In Vitro Development of NT Embryos

Developmental potential of NT embryos was compared with that of IVF embryos (Table 1). The rates of cleavage and development to the blastocyst stage of NT embryos (80.3% ± 18.6% and 27.3% ± 8.9%, respectively) were similar to those of IVF embryos (81.6% ± 5.6% and 28.2% ± 7.7%, respectively). Thus, no difference in the preimplantation development was detected between IVF and NT embryos.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. In vitro development of bovine IVF and NT embryos

Allocations of ICM Versus TE Cells in NT Blastocysts

In the next experiment, blastocysts produced by NT, IVF, and in vivo systems were individually stained by a differential staining method and then evaluated for total cell number. The total cell number of NT embryos (98.0 ± 44.3, n = 55) was equivalent to that of IVF embryos (108.2 ± 33.3, n = 52) but was significantly lower than that of in vivo-derived embryos (122.5 ± 21.6, n = 26; P < 0.05). The NT blastocysts had a higher ICM:total cell ratio (50.1 ± 17.9) as compared with IVF (42.6 ± 14.9) and in vivo-derived (34.9 ± 8.9) embryos (P < 0.05; Table 2). Representative fluorescence micrographs of bovine blastocysts (Day 7) derived from an in vivo system, IVF, and NT after differential staining are shown in Figure 1, D, E, and F, respectively. Various allocation types of ICM and TE cells are shown in NT blastocysts (Fig. 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Allocations of cells (mean ± SD) in bovine blastocysts to ICM and TE



View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Differentially stained blastocysts. Blue and red colors indicate ICM and TE cells, respectively. AC) Blastocysts derived from an in vivo system, an in vitro system, and NT, respectively, before staining. DF) Differentially stained blastocysts produced in vivo, in vitro, and by NT, respectively



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. NT blastocysts grouped by ratio of ICM:total cells: <20% (A), 20–40% (B), 40–60% (C), and >60% (D)

Distributions of NT Embryos According to Ratio of ICM:Total Cells

The next experiment was conducted to examine how many NT embryos represented an abnormal ratio of ICM:total cells. In vivo-derived blastocysts differentially stained for ICM and TE nuclei were individually classified into four groups (group I: <20%; group II: 20–40%; group III: 40–60% group IV: >60%) according to the ratio of ICM:total cells, and these embryos were compared with IVF-derived and NT embryos. The proportion of blastocysts classified into group II in in vivo-derived, IVF-derived, and NT embryos was 80.8% (21/26), 55.8% (29/52), and 30.9% (17/55), respectively (Fig. 3A). Group II embryos appear to be normal, and most of the in vivo-derived embryos were in this group. Thus, differences were detected in the distribution of presumptive normal embryos among the NT, IVF-derived, and in vivo-derived embryos (P < 0.05). In contrast to the in vivo-derived blastocysts, 67% of the NT blastocysts were allocated to groups III and IV. When the proportion is based on the ratio of TE:total cells, the distribution patterns of the embryos show a reverse tendency of the ICM distribution. The proportin of in vivo-derived, IVF-derived, and NT blastocysts having high TE ratio (group IV) was 80.8% (21/26), 57.7% (30/52), and 34.5% (19/55), respectively (Fig. 3B). Thus, NT blastocysts showed a significant difference in the proportion of TE:total cells as compared with in vivo- and IVF-derived blastocysts (P < 0.05). There was also a difference between in vivo- and IVF-derived blastocysts.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Distribution of bovine NT blastocysts according to ratio of ICM:total cells (A) and TE:total cells (B). Different superscripts within a column denote a significant difference (P < 0.05)


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although animal cloning with somatic cells as donor nuclei has been achieved in a variety of mammalian species such as sheep, cattle, mice, goats, and pigs, until now the efficiency of this approach has been very low; <1% of the reconstructed embryos with nuclei of somatic cells give rise to live-born animals. Moreover, somatic cell NT has resulted in severe developmental failures, including lower in vitro development rates, high abortion rates during early gestation, and increased perinatal death [2, 9, 10, 26]. To clarify the reason for these developmental failures, we first examined the developmental potential of NT embryos in vitro and compared cell numbers of NT blastocysts with cell numbers in IVF- and in vivo-derived embryos. As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the rate of development to the blastocyst stage and the total cell number in NT embryos were similar to those of IVF-derived embryos. Thus, NT embryos appear to have the same developmental competence as IVF-derived embryos. In general, blastocyst formation is the first differentiation process during early embryonic development in mammals, yielding the ICM and TE cells. The ICM cells contribute to all embryonic tissues and to a part of the extraembryonic membranes, whereas the TE cells mainly form the outer layer of the placenta [11]. Both cell lineages are vital for embryonic and fetal survival [12]. In this study, NT blastocysts showed a higher ICM proportion than did IVF- and in vivo-derived embryos (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that aberrant patterns of NT embryos occur during early embryonic development and that these patterns may reduce the subsequent developmental potential of NT embryos. Based on the role of ICM and TE cells, our findings provide a clue to further clarify the reason why NT-derived embryos frequently make an insufficient placenta after implantation, eventually resulting in high rates of fetal abortion at the first trimester of gestation.

Because bovine embryos produced by somatic cell NT could also be cultured to the blastocyst stage, at which time they can be transferred to recipients, it is unclear whether the increase in the number of ICM cells or the decrease in the number of TE cells is due to the NT or to in vitro culture. Thus, neither the environmental factors causing the increase in ICM cells or the decrease in TE cells nor the mechanisms by which NT embryos have aberrant proportions of ICM:TE cells are known. In this study, however, our findings suggest that the aberrant ICM:TE ratio may be due to somatic cell NT itself and not in vitro culture (Table 2), although IVF-derived embryos also showed a moderate increase in the ICM:total cell ratio as compared with in vivo-derived embryos.

It has not been possible to determine whether the developmental failures of NT embryos with somatic cell nuclei were due to incomplete nuclear reprogramming or to the cloning procedure itself. In general, it has been accepted that a nucleus from a differentiated somatic cell that is transferred into the cytoplasm of an enucleated oocyte should become reprogrammed to restore normal embryonic development. Regarding nuclear reprogramming, lack of telomere restoration of donor chromatin [27, 28], aberrant expression of specific genes [29], aberrant methylation patterns [8], and different culture systems [30] may be key factors affecting developmental failures of NT embryos. These studies provide indirect evidence that the developmental failures of NT embryos may be due to the inefficient epigenetic reprogramming of donor genomic DNA. In the present cloning system, we proposed that the primary cause of cloned fetus loss is placental abnormality [35, 7]. More than 80% of the deaths occurred between Days 30 and 60, with half of these deaths occurring between Days 30 and 40 and half occurring between Days 40 and 60 [10]. These findings suggest that cloned fetuses are variable in the degree of placental development, with more advanced placentas being able to sustain fetal growth for a longer period. Our hypothesis that aberrant ratios of ICM or TE to total cells may be one factor affecting developmental failures is supported by the result of some of our experiments (Table 2 and Fig. 3), although the hypothesis that the decrease of TE cells may be related to early abortion during embryonic development remains to be tested. A correlation between the number of TE cells and the number and/or size of the placentomes has not yet been demonstrated. Nonetheless, we provide additional evidence that developmental failures of bovine NT embryos probably are due to the incomplete blastocyst formation or disproportionate allocations of ICM and/or TE cells.

In general, the viability of in vitro-produced bovine embryos is inferior to that of in vivo-derived counterparts, possibly because of decreased embryo quality resulting from suboptimal in vitro conditions [31]. The reduced viability may result in an increased incidence of fetal mortality following embryo transfer. Abortion rates of in vivo-produced embryos ranged from 9% to 47% during the first or second trimesters of gestation [3236]. The present cloning system shows relatively high rates of early and late abortion and neonatal and early postnatal deaths [1, 4, 7, 3739]. Abortion frequency may be related to a specific deficiency or combined deficiencies in either the in vitro culture system or the NT procedure itself, leading to incomplete nuclear reprogramming of the donor cells [3]. In the present study, most NT blastocysts had abnormalities in the ratio of ICM:total cells, or a decrease in TE cells (Fig. 3). These results suggest that high frequencies of abortion and neonatal death in the present cloning system are likely related to aberrant proportions of NT embryos having reduced TE cells at the preimplantation stage.

In a previous study on in vivo-derived embryos, 40% of morula embryos did not display inner cells, and the mean number of inner cells of the morula embryos (approximately 32 cells) ranged from 2.9 to 4.0 [14]. However, inner cells are detected in most NT morula embryos. Moreover, differences in the mean number of inner cells at the morula stage were observed between NT and IVF-derived embryos (data not shown). These findings indicate that disproportionate allocations of ICM cells in bovine NT embryos begin during the morula stage.

In this study, allocations of ICM or TE cells detected in NT bovine embryos were obviously different from those of normal embryos produced in vitro or in vivo. In addition, anomalies of the NT embryo originated from early developmental stages such as the morula or blastocyst stage. These results suggest that the NT embryos having fewer TE cells in blastocyst stage may form abnormal placentas, eventually leading to fetal loss. At this time, our hypothesis that NT embryos having lower percentages of TE cells may fail during gestation cannot be tested because the embryo must be disassembled via experimental procedures. It is also uncertain whether the TE cells are restored during the later developmental stages to support the full-term development of the NT embryos. Alternatively, the ability of NT embryos to develop to term may be restricted to those embryos having a relatively normal ratio of ICM:total cells in the early developmental stages. These anomalies may also lead to inappropriate expression of genes essential for early embryonic development. Expression of a few genes that are exclusively expressed in the TE was heavily affected by the cloning procedure [30], supporting the hypothesis that abnormal placentation may be a major cause of fetal loss after transfer of NT embryos. Thus, expression profiles of known imprinted genes that are important for the embryonic survival should be compared for NT, IVF-derived, and in vivo-derived blastocysts. In addition, profiles of ICM and TE cells in blastocysts grown under different culture conditions remain to be examined.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Randall S. Prather (University of Missouri, Columbia, MO) for his peer review and comments on the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
First decision: 10 January 2002.

1 This study was supported by grants NLM0050111 and HSC0130134 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea. Back

2 Correspondence: Yong-Mahn Han, Animal Developmental Biotechnology Laboratory, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 115, Yusong, Daejeon 305-600, Korea. FAX: 82 42 860 4608; e-mail: ymhan@mail.kribb.re.kr Back

Accepted: February 14, 2002.

Received: December 31, 2001.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Kato Y, Tani T, Sotomaru Y, Kurokawa K, Kato J, Doguchi H, Yasue H, Tsunoda Y. Eight calves cloned from somatic cells of a single adult. Science 1998; 282:2095-2098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Schnieke AE, Kind AJ, Ritchie WA, Mycock K, Scott AR, Ritchie M, Wilmut I, Colman A, Campbell KH. Human factor IX transgenic sheep produced by transfer of nuclei from transfected fetal fibroblasts. Science 1997; 278:2130-2133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Wells DN, Misica PM, Tervit HR. Production of cloned calves following nuclear transfer with cultured adult mural granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:996-1005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cibelli JB, Stice SL, Golueke PJ, Kane JJ, Jerry J, Blackwell C, Ponce de Leon FA, Robl JM. Cloned transgenic calves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts. Science 1998; 280:1256-1258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Baguisi A, Behboodi E, Melican DT, Pollock JS, Destrempes MM, Cammuso C, Williams JL, Nims SD, Porter CA, Midura P, Palacios MJ, Ayres SL, Denniston RS, Hayes ML, Ziomek CA, Meade HM, Godke RA, Gavin WG, Overstrom EW, Echelard Y. Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17:456-461[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Zakhartchenko V, Durcova-Hills G, Stojkovic M, Schernthaner W, Prelle K, Steinborn R, Muller M, Brem G, Wolf E. Effects of serum starvation and re-cloning on the efficiency of nuclear transfer using bovine fetal fibroblasts. J Reprod Fertil 1999; 115:325-331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kubota C, Yamakuchi H, Todoroki J, Mizoshita K, Tabara N, Barber M, Yang X. Six cloned calves produced from adult fibroblast cells after long-term culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:990-995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kang YK, Koo DB, Park JS, Choi YH, Chung AS, Lee KK, Han YM. Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos. Nat Genet 2001; 28:173-177[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Hill JR, Roussel AJ, Cibelli JB, Edwards JF, Hooper NL, Miller MW, Thompson JA, Looney CR, Westhusin ME, Robl JM, Stice SL. Clinical and pathologic features of cloned transgenic calves and fetuses (13 case studies). Theriogenology 1999; 51:1451-1465[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Hill JR, Burghardt RC, Jones K, Long CR, Looney CR, Shin T, Spencer TE, Thompson JA, Winger QA, Westhusin ME. Evidence for placental abnormality as the major cause of mortality in first-trimester somatic cell cloned bovine fetuses. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:1787-1794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gardner RL. Cellular basis of morphogenesis. CIBA Found Symp 1989; 144:172-181[Medline]
  12. Hardy KH, Handyside AH, Winston RML. The human blastocyst: cell number, death and allocation during late preimplantation development. Development 1989; 107:597-604[Abstract]
  13. De la Fuente R, Allan King W. Use of a chemically defined system for the direct comparison of inner cell mass and trophectoderm distribution in murine, porcine and bovine embryos. Zygote 1997; 5::309-320[Medline]
  14. Soom AV, Boerjan ML, Bols PEJ, Vanroose G, Lein A, Coryn M, Kruif AD. Timing of compaction and inner cell allocation in bovine embryos produced in vivo after superovulation. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:1041-1049[Abstract]
  15. Van De Velde A, Liu L, Bols PE, Ysebaert MT, Yang X. Cell allocation and chromosomal complement of parthenogenetic and IVF bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1999; 54:57-62[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Iwasaki S, Yoshiba N, Ushijima H, Watanabe S, Nakahara T. Morphology and proportion of inner cell mass of bovine blastocysts fertilized in vitro and in vivo. J Reprod Fertil 1990; 90:279-284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Soom AV, Ysebaert MT, Kruif AD. Relationship between timing of development, morula morphology, and cell allocation to inner cell mass and trophectoderm in in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1997; 47:47-56[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Han YM, Kim SJ, Park JS, Park IY, Kang YK, Lee CS, Koo DB, Lee TH, Yu DY, Kim YH, Lee KJ, Lee KK. Blastocyst viability and generation of transgenic cattle following freezing of in vitro produced, DNA-injected embryos. Anim Reprod Sci 2000; 63:53-63[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish JL, Liebfried-Rutledge ML, Critser ES, Eyestone WH, First NL. Bovine in vitro fertilization with frozen-thawed semen. Theriogenology 1986; 25:591-600[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Rosenkrans CF Jr, Zeng GQ, McNamara GT, Schoff PK, First NL. Development of bovine embryos in vitro as affected by energy substrates. Biol Reprod 1993; 49:459-462[Abstract]
  21. Park JS, Han YM, Lee CS, Kim SJ, Kim YH, Lee KJ, Lee KS, Lee KK. Improved development of DNA-injected bovine embryos co-cultured with mouse embryonic fibroblast cells. Anim Reprod Sci 2000; 59:13-22[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Koo DB, Kang YK, Choi YH, Park JS, Han SK, Park IY, Kim SU, Lee KK, Son DS, Chang WK, Han YM. In vitro development of reconstructed porcine oocytes after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:986-992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Prather RS, Boice ML, Gibson J, Hoffman KE, Parry TW. In vitro development of embryos from Sinclair miniature pigs: a preliminary report. Theriogenology 1995; 43:1001-1007
  24. Tsunoda Y, Yasui T, Nakamura K, Uchida T, Sugie T. Effect of cutting the zona pellucida on the pronuclear transplantation in the mouse. J Exp Zool 1986; 240:119-125[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Machaty Z, Day BN, Prather RS. Development of early porcine embryos in vitro and in vivo. Biol Reprod 1998; 59:451-455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KH. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997; 385:810-813[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Lanza RP, Cibelli JB, Blackwell C, Cristofalo VJ, Francis MK, Baerlocher GM, Mak J, Schertzer M, Chavez EA, Sawyer N, Lansdorp PM, West MD. Extension of cell life-span and telomere length in animals cloned from senescent somatic cells. Science 2000; 288:665-669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Shiels PG, Kind AJ, Campbell KH, Waddington D, Wilmut I, Colman A, Schnieke AE. Analysis of telomere lengths in cloned sheep. Nature 1999; 399:316-317[Medline]
  29. Daniels R, Hall V, Trounson AO. Analysis of gene transcription in bovine nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed with granulosa cell nuclei. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:1034-1040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Wrenzycki C, Wells D, Herrmann D, Miller A, Oliver J, Tervit R, Niemann H. Nuclear transfer protocol affects messenger RNA expression patterns in cloned bovine blastocysts. Biol Reprod 2001; 65::309-317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Farin PW, Farin CE. Transfer of bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro: survival and fetal development. Biol Reprod 1995; 52:676-682[Abstract]
  32. Schmidt M, Greve T, Avery B, Beckers JF, Sulon J, Hansen HB. Pregnancies, calves and calf viability after transfer of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 1996; 46:527-539[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Reichenbach HD, Liebrich J, Berg U, Brem G. Pregnancy rates and births after unilateral or bilateral transfer of bovine embryos produced in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 95:363-370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Massip A, Mermillod P, Van Langendonckt A, Touze JL, Dessy F. Survival and viability of fresh and frozen-thawed in vitro bovine blastocysts. Reprod Nutr Dev 1995; 35:3-10
  35. Wurth YA, Reinders JMC, Rall WF, Kruip TAM. Developmental potential of in vitro produced bovine embryos following cryopreservation and single-embryo transfer. Theriogenology 1994; 42:1275-1284[CrossRef]
  36. Davis ME, Harvey WR, Bishop MD, Gearheart WW. Use of embryo transfer to induce twinning in beef cattle: embryo survival rate, gestation length, birth weight and weaning weight of calves. J Anim Sci 1989; 67:301-310
  37. Wells DN, Pavla PM, Tervit HR, Vivanco WH. Adult somatic cell nuclear transfer is used to preserve the last surviving cow of the Enderby Island cattle breed. Reprod Fertil Dev 1998; 10:369-378[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Zakhartchenko V, Alberio R, Stojkovic M, Prelle K, Schernthaner W, Stojkovic P, Wenigerkind H, Wanke R, Duchler M, Steinborn R, Mueller M, Brem G, Wolf E. Adult cloning in cattle: potential of nuclei from a permanent cell line and from primary cultures. Mol Reprod Dev 1999; 54:264-272[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Zakhartchenko V, Durcova-Hills G, Schernthaner W, Stojkovic M, Reichenbach HD, Mueller S, Steinborn R, Mueller M, Wenigerkind H, Prelle K, Wolf E, Brem G. Potential of fetal germ cells for nuclear transfer in cattle. Mol Reprod Dev 1999; 52:421-426[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P. J Ross, R. M Rodriguez, A. E Iager, Z. Beyhan, K. Wang, N. P Ragina, S.-Y. Yoon, R. A Fissore, and J. B Cibelli
Activation of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos by PLCZ cRNA injection
Reproduction, March 1, 2009; 137(3): 427 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
R. E. Everts, P. Chavatte-Palmer, A. Razzak, I. Hue, C. A. Green, R. Oliveira, X. Vignon, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, X. C. Tian, X. Yang, et al.
Aberrant gene expression patterns in placentomes are associated with phenotypically normal and abnormal cattle cloned by somatic cell nuclear transfer
Physiol Genomics, October 8, 2008; 33(1): 65 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S L Rodriguez-Zas, K Schellander, and H A Lewin
Biological interpretations of transcriptomic profiles in mammalian oocytes and embryos
Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 129 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
G. Wee, J.-J. Shim, D.-B. Koo, J.-I. Chae, K.-K. Lee, and Y.-M. Han
Epigenetic alteration of the donor cells does not recapitulate the reprogramming of DNA methylation in cloned embryos
Reproduction, December 1, 2007; 134(6): 781 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
Y. Yu, C. Ding, E. Wang, X. Chen, X. Li, C. Zhao, Y. Fan, L. Wang, N. Beaujean, Q. Zhou, et al.
Piezo-assisted nuclear transfer affects cloning efficiency and may cause apoptosis
Reproduction, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 947 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. F. Mastromonaco, L. A. Favetta, L. C. Smith, F. Filion, and W. A. King
The Influence of Nuclear Content on Developmental Competence of Gaur x Cattle Hybrid In Vitro Fertilized and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Embryos
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2007; 76(3): 514 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. M. Misica-Turner, F. C. Oback, M. Eichenlaub, D. N. Wells, and B. Oback
Aggregating Embryonic but Not Somatic Nuclear Transfer Embryos Increases Cloning Efficiency in Cattle
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2007; 76(2): 268 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. Schurmann, D. N Wells, and B. Oback
Early zygotes are suitable recipients for bovine somatic nuclear transfer and result in cloned offspring.
Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 839 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
F. Constant, M. Guillomot, Y. Heyman, X. Vignon, P. Laigre, J.L. Servely, J.P. Renard, and P. Chavatte-Palmer
Large Offspring or Large Placenta Syndrome? Morphometric Analysis of Late Gestation Bovine Placentomes from Somatic Nuclear Transfer Pregnancies Complicated by Hydrallantois
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2006; 75(1): 122 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P Tveden-Nyborg, T T Peura, K M Hartwich, S K Walker, and P Maddox-Hyttel
Morphological characterization of pre- and peri-implantation in vitro cultured, somatic cell nuclear transfer and in vivo derived ovine embryos
Reproduction, November 1, 2005; 130(5): 681 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S.-Z. Liu, L.-J. Yao, M.-X. Jiang, Z.-L. Lei, L.-S. Zhang, Y.-L. Zhang, Q.-Y. Sun, Y.-L. Zheng, X.-F. Song, and D.-Y. Chen
Apoptosis in rabbit embryos produced by fertilization or nuclear transfer with fibroblasts and cumulus cells
Reproduction, September 1, 2005; 130(3): 359 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Wrenzycki, D. Herrmann, and H. Niemann
Timing of Blastocyst Expansion Affects Spatial Messenger RNA Expression Patterns of Genes in Bovine Blastocysts Produced In Vitro
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 2073 - 2080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koo, D.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koo, D.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koo, D.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS