|
|
||||||||
a Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
epididymis, fertilization, fusion, ovum, sperm
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The epididymal sperm protein DE, a candidate molecule to mediate gamete fusion in the rat, was first described by our laboratory [3]. This protein of 32 kDa contains 10% carbohydrates [4, 5], is synthesized in an androgen-dependent manner by the proximal segments of the epididymis, and associates with the sperm surface during epididymal maturation [6, 7]. Originally localized on the dorsal region of the sperm head, DE migrates to the equatorial segment concomitantly with the occurrence of the acrosome reaction [8]. Sequential extraction of proteins from epididymal sperm revealed the existence of two populations of DE bound to sperm: a major population loosely associated with the cells, which is released from sperm during capacitation, and a tightly associated protein that remains after capacitation and migrates to the equatorial segment [9].
The relocation of DE to the equatorial segment, the region through which sperm fuses with the egg, together with experiments showing that the polyclonal anti-DE antibody significantly inhibited sperm penetration of zona-free rat eggs [10], suggested a role for this protein in sperm-egg fusion. Subsequent studies in which exposure of zona-free eggs to purified DE protein significantly reduced the percentage of penetrated eggs without affecting sperm-egg binding, supported the participation of this protein in gamete fusion through complementary sites on the egg surface [11]. Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) studies showed that these binding sites are localized over the entire egg surface with the exception of the area corresponding to the plasma membrane overlying the meiotic spindle [11, 12], a region through which fusion rarely occurs [13, 14]. Thus, whereas DE localizes on the fusogenic region of the sperm head, the DE-binding components localize on the fusogenic area of the egg surface.
Cloning and sequencing of DE indicated that it belongs to a growing family of cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISPs) [9], and exhibits significant homology with two other epididymal proteins: mouse protein AEG-1/CRISP-1 [15, 16], and human protein ARP/hCRISP-1 [17, 18]. Recent results from our group provided evidence indicating participation of the mouse [19] and human [20] homologues in gamete fusion through complementary sites on the surface of corresponding eggs.
In addition to the epididymal proteins known as CRISP-1, members of the family include CRISP-2 (also called TPX-1), which is expressed in the testes of mice, humans, guinea pigs, and rats [2123]; CRISP-3, which is detected in various cell types and tissues such as equine seminal vesicles [24, 25], salivary glands of mice and humans [18, 26], murine pre-B cells [27], and human neutrophils [28]; and two nonmammalian venom proteins, helothermine [29, 30] and cysteine-rich venom protein (CRVP) [31]. As all CRISP members, DE contains 16 cysteine residues, 10 of which are clustered in the C-terminal region of the molecule, suggesting a fundamental role for these amino acids in the biological activity of the protein. However, so far, the structure-function relationship of DE remains unknown.
In an attempt to gain insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the role of DE in sperm-egg fusion, and in particular to investigate the relationship between the structure and function of the protein, in the present work we have successfully expressed functional recombinant DE, and examined the relevance of carbohydrates and disulfide bonds for the biological activity of the protein.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A fragment containing the coding sequence of DE was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a phage clone containing the full length cDNA as a template. Two oligonucleotide primers were designed on the basis of the published DE sequence [32] with BamHI and PstI restriction sites at the 5' ends. The 28-base pair (bp) primers we used were forward, 5'-ACGGATCCCAAGATACCACTGATGAATG-3'; and reverse, 5'-CAACTGCAGACCTGATTATGTGGACTGG-3'. PCR amplification was performed using Deep-Vent polymerase (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA) in a Perkin-Elmer thermocycler (Norwalk, CT). The 780-bp fragment obtained was then cloned into pMAL-p2 plasmid (New England BioLabs) using the BamHI and PstI sites to obtain the recombinant plasmid pMAL-DE.
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Proteins
BL21 bacteria were transformed with either pMAL, pMAL-DE, or pMAL-ARP, a plasmid containing the human homologue of protein DE [17] (kindly provided by Dr. Kasahara, Hokkaido University, Japan). BL21 cells were grown in Luria-Bertani medium (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin at 37°C to reach an OD600 between 0.5 and 0.6. Expression of proteins fused to the maltose binding protein (MBP) was subsequently induced with 0.3 mM isopropyl-1-thio-ß-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG; ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa, CA) and incubation continued for 5 h at 25°C.
To analyze the periplasmic or cytoplasmic expression of the proteins, cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 4000 x g for 20 min and suspended in 30 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, and 20% sucrose. After a new centrifugation, cells were incubated in ice-cold 5 mM MgSO4 for 10 min, and centrifuged at 8000 x g for 20 min. Periplasmic proteins were present in the supernatant, whereas nonperiplasmic proteins were found in the pellet.
To purify the recombinant proteins, bacteria were grown in the presence of IPTG as described above, and the cells were pelleted by centrifugation and suspended in 20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, and 1 M NaCl, and lysed by mild sonication. The suspension was centrifuged at 9600 x g for 30 min, and the fusion protein was purified from the supernatant by affinity chromatography through an amylose-resin (New England BioLabs) column according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the sample was applied to the resin that had been equilibrated with the buffer described above, and washed with the same buffer. The bound protein was eluted with 10 mM maltose, and fractions containing the protein were pooled, dialyzed against rat fertilization medium (RFM) [33], and concentrated by filtration through Centriplus YM-10 (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA).
Electrophoresis and Western Blot Analysis
Protein extracts from 80 µl of bacteria culture and purified recombinant DE protein (recDE; 3 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE (10% acrylamide) along with broad-range protein markers (Life Technologies). Treated and untreated native DE protein (nDE; 0.2 µg) were subjected to eletrophoresis in 12% acrylamide gels according to the Laemmli method [34]. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose according to the method of Towbin et al. [35], and the membranes were probed with polyclonal anti-DE [36] or anti-MBP antibody (New England BioLabs) as previously described [9, 20].
Purification of Epididymal Protein DE
Native DE was purified following the biochemical procedures described elsewhere [4, 5]. They included 1) NH4SO4 precipitation, 2) ion-exchange chromatography in diethylaminoethyl cellulose, 3) gel filtration in Sephadex G-100 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buenos Aires, Argentina), and 4) affinity chromatography on Sepharose-Concanavalin A (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Using these procedures, a 95% pure protein with silver staining is obtained.
Deglycosylation of DE
DE protein (120 µg) was dissolved in 100 µl of 50 mM Na2HPO4 (pH 7.5) and incubated in the presence of 7500 units of Peptide N-glycosidase F (PNGase F, New England BioLabs) for 3 h at 37°C. After this period, 5000 units of fresh enzyme were added to the tube, and incubated for an additional 3 h at 37°C. DE protein was then dialyzed overnight against RFM. The protein-free control solution was subjected to the same treatments.
Detection of Sulfhydryls
Equimolar amounts of nDE, recDE, and MBP were treated with an excess of biotin-maleimide (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO) for 1 h at 37°C in the presence of 2% SDS. While recDE and MBP were separated by electrophoresis in 7.5% acrylamide gels, nDE was subjected to electrophoresis in 10% acrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, which was then stained in 0.1% Ponceau S (Sigma) in 5% (v/v) acetic acid for 10 min. After recording the results, the membrane was blocked with nonfat dried milk for 1 h at room temperature, incubated with avidin-peroxidase (1:500 in PBS, Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature, and after three washes with PBS, it was incubated with 0.4 mg/ml diaminobenzidine (Sigma) in 100 mM Tris (pH 7.5) and 0.01% v/v H2O2.
Reduction and Alkylation of DE
Native DE (200 µg) was incubated in 50 mM Tris (pH 8.5) containing 250 mM dithiotreitol (DTT; Sigma) for 2 h at 37°C. After this period, 0.1 volume of 1.5 M iodoacetic acid (IAA; Merck Química Argentina, Buenos Aires) was added, and the protein was incubated for 2 h at room temperature in the dark. Both DTT and IAA were eliminated by dialyzing the solution overnight against RFM. The protein-free control solution was subjected to the same treatments.
Recovery and Treatment of Gametes
Spermatozoa were obtained from the cauda epididymides of adult Sprague-Dawley rats, and were capacitated in RFM as previously described [8]. Metaphase II-arrested oocytes were collected from the oviductal ampullae of superovulated prepuberal female Sprague-Dawley rats. Cumulus cells were removed by incubating the egg-cumulus complex for 3 min in RFM containing 0.1% hyaluronidase (Type IV; Sigma), and zonae pellucidae were dissolved by treating the cumulus-free eggs with acid Tyrode solution (pH 2.5) for 1020 sec [11].
For experiments involving the effect of proteins on sperm-egg fusion, zona-free eggs were incubated for 30 min in 100-µl drops (under oil) of RFM alone or containing either treated or untreated nDE, recDE, or control proteins (MBP and ARP). To examine the effect of proteins on sperm-egg binding, zona-free oocytes were incubated in 25 µM recDE or MBP for 30 min. For IIF experiments, zona-free rat eggs were incubated for 30 min in 6 µM recDE or MBP as a control.
Sperm-Egg Fusion Assays
Capacitated sperm were added to zona-free eggs (0.52 x 105 cells/ml), and the gametes were coincubated for 3 h at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Eggs were then washed and analyzed for evidence of sperm penetration under phase-contrast microscopy (400x). Eggs were considered penetrated if a decondensing sperm head or two pronuclei and a sperm tail were present in the ooplasma. Alternatively, sperm-egg fusion was evaluated by incubating rat eggs with Hoechst 33342 (1 µg/ml) prior to insemination, and observing the transfer of the DNA-specific dye to the nucleus of the fused sperm as previously described [12]. Because both methods gave identical results, the former procedure was preferable for a large number of samples.
For evaluation of sperm-egg binding, capacitated sperm (0.52 x 105 cells/ml) were added to zona-free oocytes treated as described above. After an incubation period of 30 min, eggs were transferred serially through several drops of fresh RFM to remove loosely attached sperm. The eggs were then fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature, and the number of sperm bound per egg was determined.
Indirect Immunofluorescence
Treated zona-free rat eggs were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 40 min at room temperature, and then washed several times with PBS containing 10 mg/ml BSA. Oocytes were then incubated in 5% normal goat serum in PBS for 30 min at 37°C, and exposed to either anti-DE (1:50) or anti-MBP (1:100) for 1 h at 37° C. After washing three times in PBS containing 10 mg/ml BSA and 0.02% Tween-20, the oocytes were incubated for 30 min at 37° C in fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Sigma). After three washings, oocytes were incubated for 2 min in Evan's Blue, mounted in 90% glycerol in PBS, and examined with a Nikon Optiphot microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with epifluorescence optics.
Statistical Analysis
Effective concentration (EC50) values were calculated by nonlineal regression using Prism 3.0 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Differences between the effect produced by nDE and recDE were analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank test. The number of bound sperm per egg and the percentages of penetrated eggs were analyzed by the Student t-test. Results were considered significantly different at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In order to produce recombinant DE protein, the coding region for the mature protein (amino acids 20 to 246) [32] was amplified by PCR, subcloned into the pMAL expression vector, and introduced into BL21 Escherichia coli cells. Nonreducing SDS-PAGE analysis of E. coli culture lysates revealed the induction of two very close bands, with an apparent molecular weight of 68 kDa, matching the expected molecular weight for the fusion protein (DE, 26 kDa + MBP, 42 kDa) (Fig. 1A). These bands were absent in cells carrying the vector without the insert.
|
To confirm the presence of DE in the fusion protein, cell extracts were analyzed by Western blot using anti-DE as first antibody. Results indicated that the 68-kDa protein was specifically recognized by anti-DE because the antibody did not cross-react with any other protein present in extracts of bacteria containing pMAL without the insert (Fig. 1B).
The pMAL-p2 vector contains the leader peptide sequence that potentially directs the fusion protein to the bacterial periplasm. In order to determine the subcellular localization of both recDE and MBP, cytoplasmic and periplasmic fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Whereas MBP alone was successfully exported to the periplasm, recDE was associated to the cytoplasmic fraction (Fig. 1, C and D).
Although recDE was mainly associated with the insoluble fraction of the cell lysate when IPTG induction was conducted at 37°C, a substantial proportion of the protein could be recovered from the soluble fraction when expression was carried out at 25°C (data not shown). The soluble fraction was then passed through an amilose-resin column, and purification of the recombinant protein was monitored by SDS-PAGE and silver staining (Fig. 1E).
Biological Activity of recDE
Inhibition of sperm-egg fusion Sperm-egg fusion is significantly inhibited by the presence of native DE protein during gamete coincubation. In order to examine whether the bacterially expressed protein exhibits this inhibitory ability, different concentrations (0.7525 µM) of recDE were used in parallel to nDE in zona-free egg penetration assays. ARP, the human homologue of DE, also expressed as an MBP fusion protein, as well as MBP alone, were used as controls. Results showed that the presence of recDE in the incubation medium produced a dose-dependent reduction in the percentage of penetrated eggs with a significant effect observed at 1.2 µM, and maximum inhibition reached at 25 µM compared with 6 µM for nDE (Fig. 2). Both ARP and MBP, assayed at the highest concentrations (25 µM), did not affect egg penetration. Comparison between the recombinant and native protein indicated that the EC50 for recDE was significantly higher than that corresponding to nDE (8.3 µM vs. 3.1 µM; P < 0.05).
|
The decrease in the percentage of egg penetration was not due to a toxic effect of the fusion protein on sperm, because cells incubated with 25 µM recDE or MBP presented similar percentages of viability (56 ± 16 vs. 59 ± 18) and motility (52 ± 5 vs. 53 ± 6). In order to exclude the possibility that inhibition was due to an irreversible effect of the recombinant protein on egg penetrability, oocytes were incubated with 25 µM recDE or MBP for 2 h, washed in fresh medium to release the bound protein, and then inseminated with capacitated sperm. Oocytes exposed to recDE presented a high percentage of penetrability (82% ± 7%) that was not significantly different from control oocytes incubated with MBP (78% ± 15%).
Sperm-egg fusion comprises two steps: a first step of sperm-egg binding, and a second step of fusion itself. In order to evaluate whether recDE affected the first stage of the process, sperm-egg binding was evaluated after 30 min of gamete coincubation in the presence of 25 µM recDE or MBP. Results indicated that inhibition of gamete fusion was not due to an effect of recDE on sperm binding ability because neither the percentage of oocytes with bound sperm nor the mean number of sperm bound per egg were significantly different from controls (Table 1).
|
Binding of recDE to the egg surface In order to confirm the binding of recDE to the DE complementary sites on the egg surface, zona-free eggs were incubated with the recombinant protein and then subjected to IIF using anti-DE or anti-MBP as first antibodies. Zona-free rat eggs exposed to MBP were used as controls. Results showed that oocytes incubated with recDE presented a patchy fluorescent labeling over the entire egg surface with the exception of an unlabeled area already described for those oocytes incubated with nDE [11] (Fig. 3, A and B). Oocytes incubated with recDE and then washed in fresh medium (Fig. 3C), as well as those incubated with MBP (Fig. 3D), were completely negative.
|
Importance of Carbohydrates for DE Activity
The results described above indicate that recDE was capable of inhibiting sperm-egg fusion, although with a lower efficiency than nDE. Because recDE was expressed in a prokaryotic system, its lower inhibitory ability could be due to the lack of glycosylation in the molecule. In order to evaluate the relevance of carbohydrates for the biological activity of DE, the native protein was treated with PNGase F, and then tested for its ability to inhibit sperm-egg fusion in vitro. A protein-free solution subjected to the same treatments was used as a control. Figure 4A shows the successful deglycosylation of DE, as evidenced by the higher electrophoretic mobility of the protein in nonreducing polyacrylamide gels. Results shown in Figure 4B indicate that the deglycosylated protein was as efficient as the nontreated protein in inhibiting sperm-egg fusion.
|
Importance of Disulfide Bridges for DE Activity
Recent evidence from our laboratory showing a shift in the electrophoretic mobility of DE after its exposure to DTT has suggested the involvement of intramolecular disulfide bonds in protein conformation [9]. Because recDE was expressed in the bacterial cytoplasm, an alternative explanation for its lower inhibitory activity could be a wrong folding of the protein due to the lack of disulfide bridges. In order to evaluate this possibility, the presence of free sulfhydryl groups in both nDE and recDE was evaluated by labeling the molecules with biotin-maleimide. MBP, with no cysteines in its sequence, was used as a negative control. Equimolar amounts of the proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and visualized with avidin-peroxidase. As shown in Figure 5, no labeling was observed on nDE, which strongly suggests that all cysteines would be engaged in disulfide bonds. Conversely, recDE was found to exhibit a clear signal, which is indicative of the presence of free sulfhydryls.
|
Because a lower content of disulfide bonds in recDE might be responsible for the lower inhibitory ability of the protein, the relevance of disulfide bridges for DE activity was investigated. For this purpose, nDE was reduced with DTT, alkylated to avoid restoration of disulfides after DTT removal, dialyzed, and finally used in sperm-egg fusion assays. A protein-free solution subjected to the same treatments was used as a control. Results indicated that reduction of DE, confirmed by the shift in the electrophoretic mobility of the protein (Fig. 6A), significantly decreased the ability of DE to inhibit gamete fusion (Fig. 6B).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of DE was carried out using pMAL-p2, a vector designed for targeting the recombinant protein to the periplasmic space. RecDE, however, was detected as a double band in the bacterial cytoplasm. The failure of the protein to translocate to the periplasm might be explained by aspects of the protein structure, other than the presence of the leader peptide, being involved in the passage through the bacterial membrane [37, 38]. It has been reported that most of the recombinant proteins that fail to reach the periplasm either form inclusion bodies or are degraded [39, 40]. On the basis of this information, the presence of two close bands revealed by anti-DE immunoblotting might be due to mild proteolysis of recDE, because a substantial proportion of the recombinant protein was recovered from the soluble fraction.
In vitro experiments carried out in the presence of recDE revealed that the protein was able to inhibit zona-free egg penetration in a concentration-dependent manner. Inhibition was not due to a detrimental effect of the recombinant protein on any of the gametes, because sperm viability and motility were not different from controls, and normal levels of sperm penetration were observed in recDE-incubated eggs that had been subjected to washing prior to insemination. Neither the percentage of eggs with bound sperm nor the number of sperm bound per egg were affected by the presence of the recombinant protein, indicating that the inhibitory effect was subsequent to the sperm-oolema binding step. Finally, the finding that MBP as well as ARP (another member of the CRISP family also expressed as an MBP fusion protein) failed to inhibit egg penetration supports the specificity of the DE inhibitory effect.
Indirect immunofluorescence of recDE-incubated zona-free eggs showed the labeling pattern that had been previously observed in oocytes exposed to the native protein, i.e., fluorescent patches over the entire egg surface with the exception of an area corresponding to the plasma membrane overlying the meiotic spindle, a region through which fusion rarely or never occurs [13, 14]. The binding of recDE to the fusogenic region of the oolema was not mediated by the MBP portion of the fusion protein as judged by the fact that oocytes incubated with purified MBP were completely unlabeled. Together, these results indicate that recDE retains both its ability to recognize DE egg-complementary sites and to specifically inhibit gamete fusion.
Considering the lack of normal N-glycosylation in bacterially expressed proteins, the finding that the EC50 for recDE was significantly higher than that corresponding to nDE suggested that carbohydrates might contribute to the activity of the protein. In order to analyze this possibility, nDE was deglycosylated by digestion with PNGase F, an enzyme that removes the entire glycosydic core. The observation that deglycosylated DE was as efficient as the untreated protein in inhibiting gamete fusion, argues against any direct participation of the glycosydic residues in the interaction of DE with its egg-complementary sites. Nevertheless, the carbohydrate portion of the molecule might indirectly contribute to the function of the protein. One of the major roles of carbohydrates is to provide bulky, highly hydrophilic groups that help to maintain glycoproteins in solution during the folding process [41]. Misfolded proteins lacking N-oligosaccharides are generally found in the endoplasmic reticulum, where they are held by chaperones [42]. Evidence showed, however, that DE is normally secreted in the presence of tunicamycin [43], an inhibitor of N-glycosylation, suggesting that this protein can reach its native folding in the absence of carbohydrates. We cannot exclude the possibility that these residues might be important for other aspects of the protein such as its secretion by the principal cells of the epithelium, its resistance to proteases, its normal half life, or its binding to the sperm surface during epididymal maturation.
The high number and strict conservation of cysteines in CRISPs has suggested the existence of conserved intramolecular disulfide bonds, which would lead to a common tertiary structure with potentially important biological significance for this protein family [26, 44]. In view of the conformational change of DE observed after its reduction with DTT [9], an alternative explanation for the lower activity of recDE could be the absence of the proper disulfide bridges in the recombinant protein. In this regard, results clearly indicate that recDE contains free thiol groups, whereas in nDE, all or nearly all sulfhydryls would be involved in disulfide bonds. This result is not surprising considering that recDE was expressed in the bacterial cytoplasm, a reductor milieu [45].
In order to investigate the relevance of disulfide bonds for DE activity, the native protein was reduced, alkylated to avoid restoring of the disulfide bridges after DTT removal, and compared with the untreated protein for its ability to inhibit sperm-egg fusion. Considering that proper folding of sperm surface proteins is required for sperm-egg interaction [46, 47], the finding that DE reduction significantly affected its biological activity suggests the involvement of disulfide bonds in stabilizing the folding required for the interaction of DE with its egg-binding sites. The need for disulfide bonds in order for DE to exhibit full biological activity strongly supports the hypothesis that the lower content of disulfide bridges in recDE would be responsible for its lower ability to inhibit gamete fusion. The possibility that, in addition, incorrect disulfide bonds are present in recDE, cannot be excluded.
Although numerous proteins have been identified as members of the CRISP family, only two have so far been determined to have a well-characterized biological function. One is helothermine, a toxin obtained from the venom of the Mexican beaded lizard, which inhibits the ryanodine-type calcium channels [30]. The other is epididymal DE protein (and its mouse and human homologues), which participates in gamete fusion. Thus, DE protein constitutes a unique candidate of the CRISP family for performing structure-function analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the relevance of structural components for the activity of a CRISP member.
Our data taken together indicate that whereas carbohydrates would not be involved in DE-mediated gamete fusion, disulfide bridges are required for the conformation and the biological activity of the protein.
Given the potential use of DE for fertility regulation [10, 48, 49], the availability of the recombinant protein will not only allow further research on the structure-function relationship of DE, but also provide an important tool to continue exploring the use of this protein for contraceptive development.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
gt11 clone, and Dr. Alberto Kornblihtt (University of Buenos Aires) for his helpful advice on molecular biology procedures. | FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Correspondence: Patricia S. Cuasnicú, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental, Vuelta de Obligado 2490, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina. FAX: 54 11 4786 2564; cuasnicu{at}dna.uba.ar ![]()
Received: 15 January 2002.
First decision: 12 February 2002.
Accepted: 26 April 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Busso, D. J Cohen, J. A Maldera, A. Dematteis, and P. S Cuasnicu A Novel Function for CRISP1 in Rodent Fertilization: Involvement in Sperm-Zona Pellucida Interaction Biol Reprod, November 1, 2007; 77(5): 848 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Nolan, L. Wu, H. J. Bang, S. A. Jelinsky, K. P. Roberts, T. T. Turner, G. S. Kopf, and D. S. Johnston Identification of Rat Cysteine-Rich Secretory Protein 4 (Crisp4) as the Ortholog to Human CRISP1 and Mouse Crisp4 Biol Reprod, May 1, 2006; 74(5): 984 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Chatterjee, A. Richmond, E. Putiri, D. C. Shakes, and A. Singson The Caenorhabditis elegans spe-38 gene encodes a novel four-pass integral membrane protein required for sperm function at fertilization Development, June 15, 2005; 132(12): 2795 - 2808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jalkanen, I. Huhtaniemi, and M. Poutanen Mouse Cysteine-Rich Secretory Protein 4 (CRISP4): A Member of the Crisp Family Exclusively Expressed in the Epididymis in an Androgen-Dependent Manner Biol Reprod, May 1, 2005; 72(5): 1268 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Bedford Editorial Commentary J Androl, January 1, 2004; 25(1): 82 - 83. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |