Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagaosa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagaosa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nagaosa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, Y.
Biology of Reproduction 67, 1502-1508 (2002)
© 2002 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Determination of Cell Type Specificity and Estrous Cycle Dependency of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Expression in Corpora Lutea of Normally Cycling Rats in Relation to Apoptosis and Monocyte/Macrophage Accumulation1

Kaz Nagaosaa, Akiko Shiratsuchib, and Yoshinobu Nakanishi2,b

a Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology b Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-0934, Japan


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In regressive corpora lutea, apoptosis of luteal cells, expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and accumulation of monocytes/macrophages occur. However, whether these three events are correlated and what cell type expresses MCP-1 have yet to be determined. To clarify these issues, we performed histochemical examinations to determine the localization and the numbers of MCP-1 mRNA-containing cells, apoptotic cells, and monocytes/macrophages in corpora lutea of normally cycling rats. We found that the Mcp-1 gene is expressed in nonapoptotic steroidogenic luteal cells. Corpora lutea that contained MCP-1 mRNA-expressing cells increased in number at estrus together with those containing apoptotic luteal cells. When individual corpora lutea at estrus were analyzed, those with many MCP-1-expressing cells contained few apoptotic cells, and vice versa. These results collectively suggest the following pathway for apoptosis- and MCP-1-dependent regression of the corpus luteum: 1) luteal cells are induced to undergo apoptosis at estrus, and the activation of Mcp-1 gene expression follows in nonapoptotic luteal cells; 2) monocytes/macrophages are chemoattracted by MCP-1 toward corpora lutea containing apoptotic luteal cells; and 3) monocytes/macrophages invade corpora lutea and eliminate apoptotic luteal cells by phagocytosis.

corpus luteum, cytokines, female reproductive tract, gene regulation, ovulatory cycle


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
At least four different apoptotic processes take place during the development and function of the ovary: 1) the death of oocytes during prenatal germ cell attrition, 2) the death of granulosa cells during postnatal follicular atresia, 3) the death of ovarian surface epithelial cells during ovulation, and 4) the death of luteal cells during luteolysis. Although some genes involved in such physiological death of ovarian cells by apoptosis have been identified [13], the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood.

The corpus luteum, a transient endocrine tissue formed from the ovarian follicle after ovulation [4], is responsible for the maintenance of early pregnancy but regresses in the absence of mating [5]. Regression of the corpus luteum, or luteolysis, is an essential event for the ovulatory cycle, and this process is believed to be regulated by various hormones and cytokines, probably in a manner that depends on the animal species [5, 6]. Previous studies have shown that immune cells, including monocytes/macrophages and lymphocytes, accumulate, that apoptotic luteal cells increase in number, and that the expression of some cytokines is activated during regression of the corpus luteum [5, 6]. In particular, augmented expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a C-C chemokine that provokes migration of monocytes/macrophages toward the place of inflammation, in regressive corpora lutea at the mRNA [711] and protein [7, 1114] levels has been reported by several investigators. However, the possibility that monocytes/macrophages accumulate in corpora lutea because of the action of MCP-1 and play a role in luteolysis has been only speculative.

Cells undergoing apoptosis are rapidly and selectively eliminated from the organism by phagocytosis, and this phenomenon is considered to contribute to the maintenance of tissue homeostasis [1517]. Because luteal cells are induced to undergo apoptosis, phagocytic clearance of those cells is likely to cause a decrease in luteal weight and size. If this is so, then the presence of phagocytes in regressive corpora lutea should be essential for elimination of dying luteal cells. We hypothesized that MCP-1, synthesized in response to luteal cell apoptosis, induces migration of phagocytic monocytes/macrophages to corpora lutea where luteal cells are apoptosing and that the accumulated phagocytic cells engulf dying luteal cells. As the first step toward verifying this possibility, we simultaneously determined the expression of MCP-1 mRNA, the occurrence of apoptosis in luteal cells, and the accumulation of monocytes/macrophages in corpora lutea of normally cycling rats, and we compared the localization, timing, and levels of these events during the estrous cycle. The results generally, though not completely, supported our hypothesis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Tissue Collection

All experimental procedures were conducted with the approval of the animal ethics committee of our university. Female Donryu rats (7–8 wk old) (Japan SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) were housed under controlled photoperiod of 12L:12D (lights-on, 0800–2000 h). Vaginal cells were collected at noon and cytologically examined to determine their phase in the estrous cycle, which consists of proestrus, estrus, metestrus, and diestrus. Animals that showed a regular 4-day estrous cycle for more than two consecutive weeks were considered to be normally cycling and were used in the experiments. The animals were anesthetized with ether, and their ovaries were removed at various estrous phases.

Section Preparation

Isolated ovaries were immersed in PBS containing 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 12 h and then rinsed with PBS. They were further immersed successively in 10% and 20% (w/v) sucrose-containing PBS at 4°C for 12 h and then embedded with OCT compound (Sakura Finetechnical, Tokyo, Japan) on dry ice/ethanol. The ovaries were then frozen-sectioned at 10-µm thickness on glass slides coated with Vectabond Reagent (Vector, Burlingame, CA) and used for histochemical analyses.

In Situ Hybridization

In situ detection of MCP-1 mRNA in ovarian sections was carried out using RNA probes as previously described [18]. In brief, the 380-base pair DNA fragment corresponding to part of the protein-coding sequence of the rat MCP-1 cDNA [19] was inserted into pBluescript KS+ vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and used as a template for RNA probe synthesis. Antisense and sense RNA probes were synthesized in vitro in the presence of digoxigenin-labeled UTP (Dig RNA Labeling Kit; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and dissolved in a hybridization buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 2.5 mM EDTA, 0.3 M NaCl, 10% (w/v) dextran sulfate, 1x Denhardt solution, 1 mg/ml of yeast RNA, and 50% (v/v) formamide. The sections were treated successively with Triton X-100 (0.3% ;obv/v;cb), proteinase K (1 µg/ml), and paraformaldehyde (4% ;obw/v;cb). They were supplemented with the hybridization buffer containing either the sense or the antisense probe, incubated at 60°C for 16 h, and treated with RNase A to remove unreacted probes. An alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antidigoxigenin antibody was then added to the samples, and hybridization signals were visualized by adding a coloring solution containing nitroblue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate, 4-toluidine salt. The samples were counterstained with methyl green, dehydrated, covered with Entellan New (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and examined by microscopy.

Antibodies

To generate an anti-rat class B scavenger receptor type I (SR-BI) antiserum, the synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 110–132 of SR-BI of the rat [20] with an extra Cys residue at the carboxyl terminus was coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin, emulsified with Freund adjuvant, and injected into rabbits. Antibody titers in rabbit sera were monitored by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The antiserum obtained gave a discrete signal corresponding to SR-BI in Western blots of lysates of rat liver and testes (the data will be made public elsewhere). An anti-mouse Fas antiserum (named P4), which has been successfully used to detect Fas-expressing spermatogenic cells in sections of mouse testes [21], was used as a second antibody to localize luteal cells. Anti-rat CD68 monoclonal antibody clone ED1, which binds to monocytes and macrophages [22], and a polyclonal antibody recognizing activated caspase-3 were purchased from Chemicon (Temecula, CA) and Promega (Madison, WI), respectively.

Immunohistochemistry

Ovarian sections were treated with 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 for permeabilization of the plasma membrane and with 0.3% (w/v) hydrogen peroxide for inactivation of endogenous peroxidase. The sections were then blocked with 5% (v/v) swine serum and incubated with anti-SR-BI antiserum, anti-Fas antiserum, anti-CD68 antibody, or antiactivated caspase-3 antibody. The samples were subsequently reacted with either biotinylated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibody (Vector) for reaction with the anti-SR-BI or the antiactivated caspase-3 antibody or with biotinylated anti-mouse IgG antibody (Zymed, San Francisco, CA) for reaction with the anti-CD68 antibody, followed by a treatment with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, U.K.). Signals were visualized by adding a coloring solution consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.002% (w/v) hydrogen peroxide, and 0.1 mg/ml of 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride. The samples were treated and examined by microscopy as for in situ hybridization. For simultaneously detecting the hybridization and immunohistochemical signals, ovarian sections were first analyzed by in situ hybridization, the results recorded, and the immunohistochemistry subsequently conducted with no additional permeabilization step. In the analyses with antiactivated caspase-3 or anti-Fas antibody, treatment of ovarian sections with 0.3% (w/v) SDS was substituted for the treatment with Triton X-100 and proteinase K before the hybridization reaction. After the antibody reactions, the samples were treated and examined by microscopy as described above.

TUNEL Assay

Ovarian sections were fixed with 1% (w/v) paraformaldehyde, washed, and refixed with ethanol/acetic acid. The sections were treated with 3% (w/v) hydrogen peroxide and subjected to the TUNEL assay in which synthesized DNA was labeled with digoxigenin (ApopTag; Intergen, Purchase, NY). The reactions were then supplemented with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antidigoxigenin antibody, and signals were visualized and examined by microscopy as described for immunohistochemistry. Nuclei with fragmented DNA were stained brown, whereas normal nuclei were stained green. For simultaneous detection of the TUNEL and hybridization signals, the sections were first subjected to in situ hybridization and subsequently analyzed by the TUNEL assay as reported previously [23].

Numerical Analysis of Histochemical Data

The embedded ovaries were first roughly divided into three blocks, and 12 serial sections were prepared from each block. Two to three sections were used for each of four types of histochemical examination: in situ hybridization of MCP-1 mRNA, TUNEL, immunohistochemistry for detection of activated caspase-3 or monocytes/macrophages. Corpora lutea that extended through the sections were chosen and analyzed for the number of positive cells in each assay; most detectable corpora lutea (n = 5–8) were examined at proestrus (2000 and 2300 h) and estrus (all time points), whereas randomly chosen corpora lutea (n = 4) were examined at all other time points (the number of apoptotic cells was small). The number of positive cells present in the entire area of the luteal cross-section was determined either manually (hybridization signals) or digitally (the others), and the average number (per 0.16 mm2 of the luteal section) was given to each corpus luteum as the score for each histochemical assay. No significant difference was found in the results of any assays among the three blocks.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Determination of Cell Type That Expresses> the MCP-1 Gene

We first examined whether the gene coding for MCP-1 is expressed in luteal cells or other cell types present in the corpus luteum. For this purpose, sections of ovaries from normally cycling rats were analyzed simultaneously by in situ hybridization to detect MCP-1 mRNA and by immunohistochemistry to locate cell type markers. In situ hybridization was carried out using RNA probes that were synthesized in vitro and possessed either the antisense or the sense sequence of rat MCP-1 mRNA. The antisense probe clearly hybridized to the cytoplasm of cells present in corpora lutea, whereas the sense probe did not give signals (Fig. 1A), indicating that cells containing MCP-1 mRNA were present in the corpus luteum. We found that only a small fraction of cells in the tissue express the Mcp-1 gene. We then conducted immunohistochemistry to identify cell type(s) of the MCP-1 mRNA-expressing cells. Localization of CD68-positive cells was first determined to locate monocytes/macrophages in the sections. Many cells positive for anti-CD68-antibody staining were seen, but none of the positive cells contained the MCP-1 mRNA hybridization signal (Fig. 1B). An antiserum recognizing SR-BI was then used to identify steroidogenic luteal cells [24]. The antiserum bound to cells that were abundantly distributed throughout the ovary, including in corpora lutea and the periphery of follicles (i.e., theca cells), and cells containing hybridization signals for MCP-1 mRNA were also positive for SR-BI (Fig. 1C). We then immunohistochemically localized luteal cells using another antibody. When luteal sections were analyzed with an antiserum recognizing Fas, the expression of which increases in regressive corpora lutea [25, 26], cells containing MCP-1 mRNA were positively stained with the antibody (Fig. 1D). These results indicate that the Mcp-1 gene is expressed in luteal cells, but not in monocytes/macrophages, of corpora lutea in normally cycling rats.



View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. MCP-1 mRNA expression in luteal cells. Ovarian sections were analyzed for the localization of MCP-1 mRNA, monocytes/macrophages, and steroidogenic luteal cells. A) In situ detection of MCP-1 mRNA in corpora lutea at estrus (0200 h). The results with the antisense or the sense probe are shown. The bottom two panels are higher-magnification views of the corresponding top panels. Hybridization signals are shown in dark blue and counterstained nuclei in green/blue. B) Simultaneous detection of MCP-1 mRNA-expressing cells and monocytes/macrophages. The sections were subjected to immunohistochemistry with an anti-CD68 antibody at estrus (1600 h) (left panels). The bottom panel is a higher-magnification view of the top panel. In simultaneous detection of the two different signals at estrus (0200 h), the hybridization result was first recorded (top right panel), and then the sample was subjected to immunohistochemistry of CD68 (bottom right panel). Hybridization and immunohistochemistry signals appear dark blue and brown, respectively. C) Simultaneous detection of MCP-1 mRNA-expressing cells and steroidogenic cells. The sections were subjected to immunohistochemistry with an anti-SR-BI antibody at proestrus (1100 h) or both in situ hybridization of MCP-1 mRNA and immunohistochemistry of SR-BI at estrus (0200 h) as in B. The bottom left panel is a higher-magnification view of the top left panel. Note that the signals in hybridization and immunohistochemistry coexist in cells shown in the bottom right panel. CL, Corpora lutea; F, follicles. D) Simultaneous detection of MCP-1 mRNA-containing cells and Fas-expressing luteal cells. The sections at estrus (0500 h) were subjected to in situ hybridization of MCP-1 mRNA or both in situ hybridization of MCP-1 mRNA and immunohistochemistry of Fas. Arrowheads indicate hybridization signals in each panel. Bars = 50 µm

Examination of MCP-1 mRNA Expression During the Estrous Cycle

We next determined the level of Mcp-1 gene expression during the estrous cycle. Ovarian sections were prepared from rats at various estrous phases, which were assessed by histological examination of cell populations collected from vaginas. The level of MCP-1 mRNA expression showed a sharp peak at the beginning of the estrous phase (Fig. 2A, top). We then examined the same samples to detect apoptotic luteal cells using two methods: Immunohistochemistry was employed for identifying cells with activated caspase-3, and the TUNEL assay was used for locating cells with fragmented DNA. Apoptotic cells were detectable in corpora lutea by immunohistochemistry with the antiactivated caspase-3 antibody, which bound to the cytoplasm of luteal cells (Fig. 2B, left). The latter method similarly gave fewer (but clear) signals in corpora lutea as well as in follicles undergoing atresia, probably because of detection of apoptotic granulosa cells (Fig. 2B, right). Quantification of these results revealed that the number of luteal cells undergoing apoptosis, as assessed by either method, began to increase at the end of proestrus and reached a maximum at estrus (Fig. 2A, middle two panels). These results agree with those reported by Matsuyama et al. [27]. However, no conclusion could be made in the present study regarding change in the number of monocytes/macrophages, because variation was high at all time points (Fig. 2A, bottom).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Change in levels of MCP-1 mRNA expression, luteal cell apoptosis, and monocyte/macrophage accumulation during estrous cycle. A) The numbers of MCP-1 mRNA-expressing cells (in situ hybridization), apoptotic luteal cells (immunohistochemistry with antiactivated caspase-3 antibody or TUNEL), and monocytes/macrophages (immunohistochemistry with anti-CD68 antibody) present in corpora lutea at various estrous phases were determined. Circles indicate the scores for individual corpora luteum. The estrous phases and the number of corpora lutea (in parentheses) examined were: proestrus (P), 0200 h (12), 1400 h (12), 1700 h (12), 2000 h (22), and 2300 h (18); estrus (E), 0200 h (23), 0500 h (20), 0800 h (22), 1100 h (18), and 1400 h (20); metestrus (M), 0200 h (12) and 1400 h (12); and diestrus (D), 0200 h (12) and 1400 h (12). B) Detection of apoptotic cells in corpora lutea. Ovarian sections were subjected to immunohistochemistry with the antiactivated caspase-3 antibody at estrus (0200 h) (left panels) or the TUNEL assay at estrus (1100 h) (right panels). The bottom left panel shows a higher-magnification view of the top left panel. Signals derived from apoptotic cells are shown in brown and counterstained nuclei in green/blue. AF, Atretic follicles; CL, corpora lutea; HF, healthy follicles. Bars = 50 µm

Relation of MCP-1 mRNA Expression to Luteal Cell Apoptosis and Monocyte/Macrophage Accumulation

The concomitance of MCP-1 mRNA expression and apoptosis during the estrous cycle raised the possibility that apoptotic luteal cells express the Mcp-1 gene. This possibility was tested by analyzing luteal sections simultaneously for the occurrence of MCP-1 mRNA expression and apoptosis (Fig. 3). The results showed that cells bound by the antiactivated caspase-3 antibody were distinct from those cells positive for MCP-1 mRNA (Fig. 3, left). The TUNEL-positive cells were rarely found in the area where many MCP-1 mRNA-expressing cells were detectable (Fig. 3, right). These results clearly indicate that the cells expressing MCP-1 mRNA are nonapoptotic luteal cells.



View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. MCP-1 mRNA expression in nonapoptotic luteal cells. Ovarian sections at estrus (0200 h) were simultaneously examined for the localization of MCP-1 mRNA-expressing cells and apoptotic cells. Hybridization signals are shown in dark blue and signals derived from apoptotic cells in brown. Note that the area shown in the right panels contains no TUNEL-positive cells. Bars = 50 µm

At least four generations of regressing corpora lutea coexist in the ovary of cycling rats at any phase of the estrous cycle. We therefore analyzed individual corpora lutea at estrus to examine possible correlations among the levels of MCP-1 mRNA expression, apoptosis, and monocyte/macrophage accumulation (Fig. 4). Because most corpora lutea differed in size, we compared the number of positive cells in a given area of the corpus luteum. We found that corpora lutea with more MCP-1 mRNA-positive cells contained fewer apoptotic cells at all time points, and vice versa. This suggests that MCP-1 mRNA expression and apoptosis are induced in different corpora lutea, although these events seem to be synchronized during the estrous cycle, as indicated by the overall number of corpora lutea containing cells positive for these phenomena (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the correlation between the levels of MCP-1 mRNA expression and monocyte/macrophage accumulation was ambiguous, again because of high variation in the number of monocytes/macrophages from one experiment to another.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Correlation of levels of MCP-1 mRNA expression, luteal cell apoptosis, and monocyte/macrophage accumulation in individual corpora lutea at estrus. Corpora lutea were aligned according to the level of MCP-1 mRNA expression (top panels), and their scores of apoptotic cells (middle two panels) and monocytes/macrophages (bottom panels) were compared. Scores for individual corpora lutea (shown by dots) and their means (bars) are presented


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The presence of MCP-1 mRNA or protein in the corpus luteum has been reported for various animal species, including murine [7, 12, 13], bovine [8, 10, 14], ovine [8, 9], and human [11], but the identity of the cell type(s) responsible for the Mcp-1 gene expression has been ambiguous. In the present study, we have shown that cells expressing MCP-1 mRNA are steroidogenic luteal cells in normally cycling rats. This conclusion appears to conflict with the results reported by Haworth et al. [9], who found that large steroidogenic cells, as assessed immunohistochemically with an antibody recognizing tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, did not contain MCP-1 mRNA in corpora lutea of prostaglandin F2{alpha}-administered sheep. The reasons for this discrepancy are not certain at present, but they could include 1) the fact that small luteal cells in the sheep express MCP-1, 2) a difference in the conditions of the animals (normal rats vs. prostaglandin F2{alpha}-treated sheep), or 3) a difference in the antibodies used to identify steroidogenic cells. Penny et al. [10] has raised the possibility that MCP-1 is expressed in CD5-positive T lymphocytes in corpora lutea of the cow; however, their experimental procedure was not accurate enough to identify cell types expressing MCP-1. Penny et al. compared two serial luteal sections, one analyzed by in situ hybridization for MCP-1 mRNA and the other by immunohistochemistry with an anti-CD5 antibody. The level of MCP-1 mRNA expression increased slightly later than that of luteal cell apoptosis during the estrous cycle (Fig. 2A). Accumulation of mRNA after transcription induction is, in general, a rapid event compared with the activation of caspase-3, which takes hours to occur irrespective of the type of apoptotic stimuli. It can thus be concluded that Mcp-1 gene expression is preceded by the induction of apoptosis. However, the signal that initiates the apoptotic process is unlikely to simultaneously trigger expression of the Mcp-1 gene: MCP-1 mRNA-expressing luteal cells were not apoptotic, and moreover, corpora lutea with higher levels of MCP-1 expression contained fewer apoptotic cells. Further studies are needed to clarify a possible causal connection between apoptosis and MCP-1 expression in luteal cells.

In the present study, high variation in the number of monocytes/macrophages in individual corpora lutea retarded examination of possible correlation between the levels of MCP-1 expression and phagocyte accumulation. This is probably because recent and older generations of corpora lutea were not separately analyzed. Bowen et al. [13, 28] showed that the number of macrophages increases in corpora lutea entering estrus. Thus, expression of the Mcp-1 gene in luteal cells, induction of luteal cell apoptosis, and accumulation of monocytes/macrophages in corpora lutea likely are all induced at the entrance of the estrous phase. Another approach is necessary to verify the possibility that monocytes/macrophages invade corpora lutea by the action of MCP-1.

The pituitary hormone prolactin is the most likely candidate for initiating the involution of corpora lutea [29, 30]. Other factors, however, also seem to be involved in the phenomenon, including the pituitary hormones FSH and LH; the steroid hormone progesterone, which is secreted from the corpus luteum; glucocorticoids; and cytokines, including prostaglandin F2{alpha}, tumor necrosis factor {alpha}, and inhibin/activin. These hormones and cytokines might directly or indirectly regulate apoptosis in luteal cells. Kuranaga et al. [3133] have proposed that prolactin stimulates the expression of Fas ligand in lymphocytes present in corpora lutea and that, in turn, this induces apoptosis in Fas-expressing luteal cells. In fact, the levels of mRNA and protein expression of Fas and Fas ligand increase in the rat corpus luteum during pregnancy and postpartum [25], and the amount of Fas mRNA increases in corpora lutea of the cow at regressive phases [26]. This is an intriguing idea, because the amount of MCP-1 mRNA increases in human glioma cells after treatment with an apoptosis-inducing anti-Fas antibody [34]. Our results indicate that apoptosing luteal cells themselves do not contain detectable amounts of MCP-1 mRNA. Thus, cells undergoing Fas-mediated apoptosis may somehow activate expression of the Mcp-1 gene in bystander nonapoptotic luteal cells.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank H. Shinohara and E. Kuranaga for valuable suggestions and N. Mukaida for materials and useful comments.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research), the Sumitomo Foundation, the Honjin Foundation, the Hayashi Memorial Foundation for Female Natural Scientists, and the Japan Science Society. Back

2 Correspondence: Yoshinobu Nakanishi, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-0934, Japan. FAX: 81 76 234 4480; nakanaka{at}kenroku.kanazawa-u.ac.jp Back

Received: 28 February 2002.

First decision: 26 March 2002.

Accepted: 11 June 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Tilly JL, Tilly KI, Perez GI. The genes of cell death and cellular susceptibility to apoptosis in the ovary: a hypothesis. Cell Death Differ 1997 4:180-187[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Marti A, Jaggi R, Vallan C, Ritter PM, Baltzer A, Srinivasan A, Dharmarajan AM, Friis RR. Physiological apoptosis in hormone-dependent tissues: involvement of caspases. Cell Death Differ 1999 6:1190-1200[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Pru JK, Tilly JL. Programmed cell death in the ovary: insights and future prospects using genetic technologies. Mol Endocrinol 2001 15:845-853[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Murphy BD. Models of luteinization. Biol Reprod 2000 63:2-11[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. McCracken JA, Custer EE, Lamsa JC. Luteolysis: a neuroendocrine-mediated event. Physiol Rev 1999 79:263-324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bukulmez O, Arici A. Leukocytes in ovarian function. Hum Reprod Update 2000 6:1-15[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Townson DH, Warren JS, Flory GM, Naftalin DM, Keyes PL. Expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in the corpus luteum of the rat. Biol Reprod 1996 54:513-520[Abstract]
  8. Tsai S-J, Juengel JL, Wiltbank MC. Hormonal regulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 messenger ribonucleic acid expression in corpora lutea. Endocrinology 1997 138:4517-4520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Haworth JD, Rollyson MK, Silva P, McIntush EW, Niswender GD. Messenger ribonucleic acid encoding monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is expressed by the ovine corpus luteum in response to prostaglandin F2{alpha}. Biol Reprod 1998 58:169-174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Penny LA, Armstrong DG, Baxter G, Hogg C, Kindahl H, Bramley T, Watson ED, Webb R. Expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in the bovine corpus luteum around the time of natural luteolysis. Biol Reprod 1998 59:1464-1469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Senturk LM, Seli E, Gutierrez LS, Mor G, Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 expression in human corpus luteum. Mol Hum Reprod 1999 5:697-702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Bowen JM, Keyes PL, Warren JS, Townson DH. Prolactin-induced regression of the rat corpus luteum: expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and invasion of macrophages. Biol Reprod 1996 54:1120-1127[Abstract]
  13. Bowen JM, Towns R, Warren JS, Keyes PL. Luteal regression in the normally cycling rat: apoptosis, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and inflammatory cell involvement. Biol Reprod 1999 60:740-746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Townson DH, O'Connor CL, Pru JK. Expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and distribution of immune cell populations in the bovine corpus luteum throughout the estrous cycle. Biol Reprod 2002 66:361-366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ellis RE, Yuan J, Horvitz HR. Mechanisms and functions of cell death. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1991 7:663-698[CrossRef]
  16. Ren Y, Savill J. Apoptosis: the importance of being eaten. Cell Death Differ 1998 5:563-568[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Savill J, Fadok V. Corpse clearance defines the meaning of cell death. Nature 2000 407:784-788[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Ando H, Haruna Y, Suzuki M, Yamada S, Okabe M, Nakanishi Y. Ectopic activation of the transcription promoter for the testis-specific mouse Pgk-2 gene on elimination of a cis-acting upstream DNA region. Dev Growth Differ 2000 42:385-393[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Yoshimura T, Takeya M, Takahashi K. Molecular cloning of rat monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and its expression in rat spleen cells and tumor cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1991 174:504-509[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Shiratsuchi A, Kawasaki Y, Ikemoto M, Arai H, Nakanishi Y. Role of class B scavenger receptor type I in phagocytosis of apoptotic rat spermatogenic cells by Sertoli cells. J Biol Chem 1999 274:5901-5908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Koji T, Hishikawa Y, Ando H, Nakanishi Y, Kobayashi N. Expression of Fas and Fas ligand in normal and ischemia-reperfusion testes: involvement of the Fas system in the induction of germ cell apoptosis in the damaged mouse testis. Biol Reprod 2001 64:946-954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Dijkstra CD, Döpp EA, Joling P, Kraal G. The heterogeneity of mononuclear phagocytes in lymphoid organs: distinct macrophage subpopulations in the rat recognized by monoclonal antibodies ED1, ED2, and ED3. Immunology 1985 54:589-599[Medline]
  23. Sträter J, Walczak H, Krammer PH, Möller P. Simultaneous in situ detection of mRNA and apoptotic cells by combined hybridization and TUNEL. J Histochem Cytochem 1996 44:1497-1499[Abstract]
  24. Reaven E, Nomoto A, Leers-Sucheta S, Temel R, Williams DL, Azhar S. Expression and microvillar localization of scavenger receptor, class B, type I (a high density lipoprotein receptor) in luteinized and hormone-desensitized rat ovarian models. Endocrinology 1998 139:2847-2856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Roughton SA, Lareu RR, Bittles AH, Dharmarajan AM. Fas and Fas ligand messenger ribonucleic acid and protein expression in the rat corpus luteum during apoptosis-mediated luteolysis. Biol Reprod 1999 60:797-804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Taniguchi H, Yokomizo Y, Okuda K. Fas-Fas ligand system mediates luteal cell death in bovine corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 2002 66:754-759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Matsuyama S, Chang K-T, Kanuka H, Ohnishi M, Ikeda A, Nishihara M, Takahashi M. Occurrence of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation during prolactin-induced structural luteolysis in cycling rats. Biol Reprod 1996 54:1245-1251[Abstract]
  28. Bowen JM, Keyes PL. The proestrous prolactin surge is not the sole initiator of regressive changes in corpora lutea of normally cycling rats. Biol Reprod 1999 61:1208-1215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Malven PV, Sawyer CH. A luteolytic action of prolactin in hypophysectomized rats. Endocrinology 1966 79:268-274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Wuttke W, Meites J. Luteolytic role of prolactin during the estrous cycle of the rat. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1971 137:988-991[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Kuranaga E, Kanuka H, Bannai M, Suzuki M, Nishihara M, Takahashi M. Fas/Fas ligand system in prolactin-induced apoptosis in rat corpus luteum: possible role of luteal immune cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999 260:167-173[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Kuranaga E, Kanuka H, Hirabayashi K, Suzuki M, Nishihara M, Takahashi M. Progesterone is a cell death suppressor that downregulates Fas expression in rat corpus luteum. FEBS Lett 2000 466:279-282[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Kuranaga E, Kanuka H, Furuhata Y, Yonezawa T, Suzuki M, Nishihara M, Takahashi M. Requirement of the Fas ligand-expressing luteal immune cells for regression of corpus luteum. FEBS Lett 2000 472:137-142[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Choi C, Xu X, Oh J-W, Lee SJ, Gillenspie GY, Park H, Jo H, Benveniste EN. Fas-induced expression of chemokines in human glioma cells: involvement of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Cancer Res 2001 61:3084-3091[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K. Nagaosa, C. Nakashima, A. Kishimoto, and Y. Nakanishi
Immune response to bacteria in seminiferous epithelium
Reproduction, May 1, 2009; 137(5): 879 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. J Cannon, J. S Davis, and J. L Pate
The class II major histocompatibility complex molecule BoLA-DR is expressed by endothelial cells of the bovine corpus luteum
Reproduction, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 991 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagaosa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagaosa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nagaosa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS