Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 14, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008516
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/1/167    most recent
biolreprod.102.008516v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kanatsu-Shinohara, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shinohara, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kanatsu-Shinohara, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shinohara, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kanatsu-Shinohara, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shinohara, T.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 167–173 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008516
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Reproductive Technology

Allogeneic Offspring Produced by Male Germ Line Stem Cell Transplantation into Infertile Mouse Testis1

Mito Kanatsu-Shinoharaa, Narumi Ogonukic, Kimiko Inouec, Atsuo Ogurac, Shinya Toyokunib, Tasuku Honjoa, and Takashi Shinohara2,a

a Department of Medical Chemistry, b Department of Pathology and Biology of Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan 606-8501 c The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Bioresource Center, Ibaraki, Japan 305-0074


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The testis is one of several immune-privileged organs and is known for its unique ability to support allogeneic or xenogeneic tissue transplants. We investigated the possibility of deriving offspring from mice that underwent transplantation with allogeneic male germ line stem cells in the testis. Although mature adult mice rejected allogeneic germ cells and were infertile, offspring were obtained by intracytoplasmic germ cell injection using partially differentiated donor cells. In contrast, complete spermatogenesis occurred when allogeneic germ cells were transplanted into immature pup testes. Tolerance induction by monoclonal antibody administration allowed the pup transplant recipients to produce allogeneic offspring by natural mating, whereas no spermatozoa were found in the epididymis of untreated recipients. Thus, these results indicate that a histoincompatible recipient can serve as a "surrogate father" to propagate the genetic information of heterologous male donors.

immunology, in vitro fertilization, Sertoli cells, spermatogenesis, testis


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The testis is one of several immune-privileged organs in the body [1]. Despite the high immunogenicity of male germ cells, much of the development of spermatogenesis occurs after maturation of the immune system's "self"-recognition, and spermatogenic cells persist within the male reproductive tract throughout life without eliciting an immune response [2]. In addition, allografts as well as xenografts survive for a considerably longer period in the testis than in most other tissues [1, 3].

Immune privilege in the testis is thought to result from the unique anatomical structure of the seminiferous tubules and local immunosuppression by Sertoli cells, a major somatic cell in the seminiferous tubule [2]. In mice, Sertoli cells form the blood-testis barrier approximately 2 wk after birth [4] and separate the immunogenic haploid cells from the immune system [2]. In addition, Sertoli cells have local immunosuppressive activity, because cotransplantation of Sertoli cells with adrenal chromaffin cells [5], islet cells [6], or dopamine-secreting neurons [7] leads to acceptance of the transplants in allogeneic or xenogeneic hosts. Although the site of expression remains controversial [8], Fas ligand expressed on Sertoli cells is believed to play a key role in the induction of transplantation tolerance in the testis as well as in other immune-privileged organs [9, 10].

The body contains several self-renewing systems, including hematopoietic tissue, intestinal epithelium, and epidermis [11]. Spermatogenesis originates from spermatogonial stem cells, and the continuous production of progenitor cells supports male reproduction throughout the life of adult animals [4]. Because stem cells are considered to proliferate indefinitely, allogeneic stem cell transplantation has been a subject of intense investigation, mostly for clinical purposes. Particularly regarding the hematopoietic system, several decades of active investigation have made transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells an accepted therapy for numerous hematological malignancies, metabolic disorders, and solid tumors [12]. However, little is known about the immunological response to transplantation of other types of allogeneic stem cells, particularly how they are affected by histoincompatibility [12, 13].

Recently, a technique to transfer spermatogonial stem cells was developed in which the stem cells are transplanted into the seminiferous tubules of infertile recipient animals [14]. The transplanted stem cells proliferate on the basement membrane and establish colonies of spermatogenesis [15]. Spermatogonial stem cells are unique among the many types of stem cells in that they reside in an immune-privileged microenvironment. In the present study, we investigated if male germ cells that develop in a histoincompatible environment are fertile, whether used for intracytoplasmic germ cell injection or for natural mating in immunosuppressed recipients.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Transplantation Procedure

In the first set of experiments using adult recipients, donor cells were recovered from the testes of a transgenic mouse line B6-TgR(ROSA26)26Sor (ROSA26; H-2b haplotype) purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) [16]. This mouse expresses the Escherichia coli LacZ transgene in all cells of the seminiferous tubules [15]. Donor cells used for intracytoplasmic germ cell injection experiments were isolated from the testes of a transgenic mouse line C57BL/6 Tg14(act-EGFP)OsbY01 (Green; H-2b haplotype) provided by Dr. M. Okabe (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan). The spermatogonia and spermatocytes of these mice express the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene, which gradually decreases after meiosis [17].

Donor cells were transplanted into the testes of C57BL/6J (B6; H-2b haplotype) and C3H/HeJ (C3H; H-2k haplotype) adult males that had been treated with busulfan (44 mg/kg) at 6 wk of age [14]. To protect from the deleterious systemic effects of busulfan (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), the recipient mice were transplanted with homologous bone marrow cells. A volume of 0.25 ml containing 0.75–1.5 x 106 cells was injected into the jugular vein of recipient mice 5–7 days after busulfan treatment. For the testicular injections, approximately 10 µl of the donor cell suspension were introduced into the seminiferous tubules of a B6 testis and 5 µl into the tubules of a C3H testis, because the latter mouse line has smaller testes. The injection filled 75–85% of the tubules in each recipient testis [18]. Transplanted donor cells, from ROSA26 or Green mice, were detected by staining for LacZ with the substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl ß-D-galactoside (X-gal; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) [15] or by ultraviolet (UV) light excitation [17], respectively.

In the second set of experiments, WBB6F1-W/Wv (W; Japan SLC, Hamamatsu, Japan) mice were used as recipients [19]. Donor testis cells from pups (age, 6 days) and cryptorchid adults (age, 14–20 wk) were isolated from the testes of DBA/2 (H-2d haplotype) or BALB/c (H-2d haplotype) mice (Japan SLC). Cryptorchid testes were produced as previously described [20] and used 2–3 mo after the cryptorchid operation. Single-cell suspensions from donor testes were prepared by two-step enzymatic digestion [18]. Donor testis cells were transplanted into recipient W pups (age, 5–10 days; H-2b/j haplotype) [21]. The W mice are congenitally infertile, because they lack all stages of differentiating germ cells due to mutations in the c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase [22]. Approximately 2 µl of the donor cell suspension were injected into each recipient testis through the efferent duct [18].

Donor cells were suspended at a concentration of 108 cells/ml (first experiment) or 3 x 107 cells/ml (second experiment) in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium, supplemented as described elsewhere [18]. Adult recipient mice were anesthetized by Avertin (Sigma) injection (640 mg/kg). Pup recipients were placed on ice to cause hypothermia-induced anesthesia [23].

All animal experimentation protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Kyoto University.

Intracytoplasmic Germ Cell Injection and Transfer of Embryos to Foster Mothers

For intracytoplasmic germ cell injection, the testes were exposed to UV excitation light to detect EGFP-positive cells under a stereomicroscope equipped with a UV light (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The seminiferous tubules of the recipient testes were carefully dissected, and the germ cells were collected mechanically [24]. Intracytoplasmic germ cell injection into C57BL/6 x DBA/2 F1 (B6D2F1) oocytes was performed [24]. Embryos that reached the 4-cell stage after 48 h in culture were transferred to the oviducts of Day 1 pseudopregnant Imperial Cancer Research (ICR) females. Live fetuses retrieved on Day 19.5 were raised by lactating foster ICR mothers.

Immunosuppression of the Recipients

Several methods known to induce immunological tolerance were employed in some of the recipient W mice after transplantation. Rapamycin (Sigma) treatment consisted of 0.2 mg/kg per day i.p. for the first 3 days after transplantation, followed by 0.2 mg/kg every other day for 14 days [25]. Monoclonal antibody treatment consisted of 50 µg of anti-CD4 antibody (GK1.5) i.p. on Days 0, 2, and 4 after transplantation [26]. When indicated, recipients received additional i.p. injections of 50 µg of anti-CD8 antibody (53.67) on Days 0, 2, and 4 after transplantation [27]. Both antibodies were purchased from Pharmingen (San Jose, CA).

Analysis of Recipient Testes

To quantitate donor-derived colonies, recipient mouse testes were recovered 2 and 4 mo after donor cell transplantation and analyzed by X-gal staining [15]. This method allows the specific identification of donor germ cells, because endogenous germ cells in the seminiferous tubules of busulfan-treated recipients do not stain with X-gal (Fig. 1). A cluster of germ cells was defined as a colony when it occupied more than 50% of the basal surface of the tubule and was at least 0.1 mm in length [15]. The efficiency of colonization was evaluated by counting the total colony number and measuring the individual colony length under a stereomicroscope. Because the injected testis cell suspension contained 108 cells/ml, the number of cells injected into recipient B6 and C3H testes was 1 x 106 and 0.5 x 106 cells, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA followed by Turkey honestly significantly different (HSD) multiple comparisons.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Spermatogonial transplantation of ROSA26 testis cells. A) Testis from a ROSA26 transgenic mouse incubated in X-gal showing blue staining of cells. B) Testis from a busulfan-treated B6 recipient mouse demonstrating that cells do not stain. C) A recipient testis 2 mo after transplantation of ROSA26 testis cells. Blue stretches of seminiferous tubules represent colonies from donor spermatogonial stem cells that have expanded to produce areas of spermatogenesis. Bar = 1 mm

In experiments that employed W mice as recipients, four histological sections were taken at 12-µm intervals from the testes of each mouse. Each slide was viewed at 400x (to determine the level of spermatogenesis in the W testes). The number of tubule cross-sections with spermatogenesis (defined as the presence of multiple layers of germ cells in the seminiferous tubule) or no spermatogenesis was recorded for one section from each testis. All sections were fixed in 10% (w/v) neutral-buffered formalin (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Allogeneic Spermatogonial Transplantation into Adult Testes

To examine the degree of donor cell colonization in an allogeneic testicular microenvironment, we transferred donor cells from the testes of fertile ROSA26 mice (B6) into the seminiferous tubules of syngeneic (B6) or allogeneic (C3H) male recipients sterilized by busulfan treatment, which allows donor cell colonization by destroying endogenous germ cells [14].

Six separate experiments were performed, and the results are summarized in Table 1. In each experiment, all recipients received the same donor cell population at the same time. Recipient testes were analyzed by X-gal staining 2 and 4 mo after donor cell transplantation. Because the length of time from initiation of stem cell division to formation of mature spermatozoa is 35 days in mice [4], this represents approximately 2- to 4-fold the duration of mouse spermatogenesis and should provide sufficient time to complete spermatogenesis after transplantation [15].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Donor cell colonization into testes of syngeneic and allogeneic adult recipient mice.a

In the syngeneic transplants, all 22 recipient B6 testes contained donor cell colonies (Table 1, lines 1 and 3) that gradually increased in length between 2 and 4 mo after transplantation. The colonies, which are formed by the progeny of one stem cell [15], were typically in the form of dark blue stretches of completely filled segment flanked by weakly stained regions (Fig. 2A). Spermatogenesis appeared morphologically normal at histological examination (Fig. 2, B and C).



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Transplantation of ROSA26 donor cells into allogeneic adult testis. A) A whole mount of a B6 recipient seminiferous tubule segment 2 mo after transplantation, showing a dark colony. B and C) A microscopic cross-section of an area of spermatogenesis derived from the cells of a ROSA26 donor testis in a B6 recipient seminiferous tubule 2 mo (B) and 4 mo (C) after transplantation. Note the normal-appearing organization of spermatogenesis. The arrows indicate spermatozoa. D) A whole mount of a C3H recipient seminiferous tubule segment 2 mo after transplantation. Only scattered donor cells remain on the basement membrane. E) A whole mount of a segment of seminiferous tubule from the same C3H recipient mouse as in D. The blue area is dark in the center, indicating the presence of multiple layers of germ cells. F) Incomplete spermatogenesis in a C3H recipient mouse 2 mo after transplantation. The arrows indicate donor-derived round spermatids. G) Inflammatory cell infiltrates in a C3H recipient mouse 2 mo after transplantation. The asterisks indicate the empty seminiferous tubules. Bar = 200 µm (A, D, and E), 25 µm (B, C, and F), and 50 µm (G). Stain: X-gal (A, C, and D) and X-gal followed by hematoxylin and eosin (B, E, and F)

In the allogeneic recipients, 4 of 8 (50%) C3H allogeneic testes contained colonies 2 mo after transplantation (Fig. 2, D and E, and Table 1, line 2), but none of the 16 testes contained colonies at 4 mo after transplantation (Table 1, line 4). Colonies in the allogeneic seminiferous tubules showed varying degrees of donor cell colonization, ranging from scattered spermatogonia cells on the basement membrane (Fig. 2D) to advanced spermatogenesis (Fig. 2E). Spermatogenesis in the allogeneic recipient testes was histologically disorganized, but the donor cells were at least able to differentiate into round spermatids by 2 mo after transplantation (Fig. 2F). Focal lymphocytic infiltrates were found mostly in the intertubular region (Fig. 2G), indicating that the allogeneic donor cells were being rejected. Interestingly, not all of the colonies were accompanied by lymphocytic infiltration. Neither donor germ cells nor lymphocytes were found 4 mo after transplantation (data not shown). Thus, although some colonies were present at 2 mo, the donor germ cells were rejected by 4 mo and were incapable of completing spermatogenesis in the allogeneic environment.

Birth of Allogeneic Offspring from Adult Recipients by Intracytoplasmic Germ Cell Injection

To test whether allogeneic germ cells are fertile, we used intracytoplasmic germ cell injection (a technique commonly used to derive offspring from infertile animals or humans) [2831]. Donor testis cells were collected from Green mice, which express the EGFP gene in their spermatogenic cells. The donor cells were transplanted into five busulfan-treated C3H recipients. At 2 mo after transplantation, two of the recipients had green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive donor cells in both testes as identified at fluorescent microscopy. Live spermatogenic cells were recovered by repeatedly pipetting the colonized tubule fragments. Donor round spermatids, identified by a small round nucleus with a uniquely shaped chromatin mass, were subsequently injected into B6D2F1 oocytes (Fig. 3, A and B).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Generation of offspring by intracytoplasmic germ cell injection using round spermatids recovered from a C3H allogeneic recipient male that had been transplanted with GFP donor cells. A and B) Spermatogenic cells released from a segment of seminiferous tubule that was colonized by GFP donor cells. Nomarski (A) and fluorescent (B) images. The arrow indicates a donor-derived round spermatid that was used in egg injection. The arrowheads indicate spermatogenic cells at an unidentified stage. These cells were not used in egg injections. C) A pup that developed from an oocyte injected with a round spermatid. The presence of the donor cell haplotype is evidenced by the green fluorescence seen under GFP excitation light. Bar = 200 µm (A and B)

Of the 69 embryos thus constructed with round spermatids, 65 (94%) progressed to the 4-cell stage by 48 h in culture. After embryo transfer into the oviducts, 52 embryos (75%) implanted in the uteri, and the two recipients gave birth to a total of 15 pups (22%; does not include one pup that was cannibalized within a few days after birth), of which 7 were male and 8 were female. The origin of the pups was confirmed by the fluorescence of GFP under UV light (Fig. 3C). All of the offspring grew into normal adults. Thus, these results indicate that donor germ cells that develop in a histoincompatible environment are fertile and can be used to produce normal offspring by intracytoplasmic germ cell injection without any immunosuppression.

Allogeneic Spermatogonial Transplantation into Infertile Pup Testes and Birth of Allogeneic Offspring by Natural Mating

In the second set of experiments, we examined whether allogeneic stem cell transplantation can restore fertility to an infertile mouse strain by natural mating. In W mice, endogenous spermatogenesis does not occur (Fig. 4A), but these mice are capable of producing offspring from transplanted donor testis cells [23, 3234]. To improve the efficiency of allogeneic spermatogenesis, we employed three modifications in the transplantation protocol. First, we used immature pup recipients for transplantation, because they allow more colonization events for transplanted stem cells and have a higher fertility restoration rate than adults [23, 32]. Second, we used enriched stem cell populations from 6-day-old pup testes or adult cryptorchid testes (2–3 mo after the operation). These testes contain a higher concentration of stem cells than untreated adult testes do, because they lack differentiating germ cells [20, 32]. The transplantation of enriched stem cells will also improve the colonization level. Finally, several protocols were used to induce tolerance [2527], to inhibit the rejection of allogeneic cells, as occurred in the first experiment. It was known that tolerance can be induced by using antibodies to transiently block CD4 and CD8 molecules on the T cells [26, 27]. We also used rapamycin, another immunosuppressive agent, that can induce allograft tolerance by blocking proliferative signals for T cells [25].



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Transplantation of germ cells into allogeneic W pup testis. A) The microscopic appearance of W recipient testis (no transplantation). Note the complete absence of spermatogenesis. B) Spermatogenesis in untreated recipient testis 188 days after transplantation of BALB/c cryptorchid testis cells. C) Higher-magnification view of B. Note the apparently normal spermatogenesis and the absence of lymphoid cell infiltrates. D) The progeny of an infertile W recipient male (no. 545; anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 antibody treatment; white) transplanted with a BALB/c cryptorchid testis cells. The recipient male was mated with a B6 female (black). Because the donor sperm came from a BALB/c mouse (albino), the agouti coat color of the offspring indicates the transmission of the donor cell haplotype. Fertilization by the endogenous recipient germ cells from either W or Wv haplotype (black) would have resulted in the offspring with black coat color (W/+ or Wv/+; black). E) A macroscopic comparison of untransplanted (left) and anti-CD4 antibody-treated (right) recipient testes 219 days after transplantation with DBA/2 pup testis cells. Note the increased size of the anti-CD4 antibody-treated recipient testis. Bar = 100 µm (A and C), 200 µm (B), and 1 mm (E). Stain: hematoxylin and eosin (A–C)

Allogeneic donor testis cells were collected from either BALB/c or DBA/2 testes and transplanted into W pup recipients (age, 5–10 days) using modified transplantation protocols. Approximately 3 x 104 allogeneic testis cells (~2% of the cells recovered from a donor testis) were introduced into each W pup recipient testis, and 37 testes of 24 pups were injected with donor cells under four different recipient conditions (Table 2). Two months after transplantation, all of the recipients were housed with two untreated females to determine whether spermatogonial transplantation had restored fertility. The testes of the recipients were analyzed for the presence of spermatogenesis between 184 to 219 days after transplantation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Development of allogeneic spermatogenesis in W pup recipient testes.a

Histological analyses revealed that a restoration of spermatogenesis occurred in six of eight (75%) untreated W recipient testes (Fig. 4B and Table 2, line 1), indicating that spermatogonial stem cells can colonize and complete spermatogenesis when transplanted into an immature allogeneic environment. Interestingly, no inflammatory cells were found in the recipient testes with allogeneic spermatogenesis (Fig. 4C). Spermatogenesis in the recipient testes originated only from the donor cells, because the W recipients were incapable of generating spermatogenesis from the defective endogenous stem cells [19]. In the most successful case, the testes contained as many as 59 cross-sections of seminiferous tubules (45% of all tubules), which hosted various stages of spermatogenesis (Fig. 4, B and C). However, spermatozoa were not found in the epididymis of the recipient animals, and none of the untreated recipient males became fertile.

In contrast, 4 of the 18 (22%) immunosuppressed recipient males produced progeny, beginning 123 days after donor cell injection (Fig. 4D and Table 3). Consistent with these observations, the immunosuppressive treatments increased both the testicular weight and the colonization level (Fig. 4E and Table 2). In total, epididymides of 9 of the 18 (50%) immunosuppressed recipients contained spermatozoa, suggesting that they had the potential to be fertile (Table 2, lines 2–4). Furthermore, the testes of the fertile males were significantly heavier than those of the untreated, infertile males, indicating the extensive donor cell colonization (Tables 2 and 3). The four recipients that produced progeny remained fertile up to the time of analysis, at least 219 days after transplantation (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Progeny from W recipient mice injected with allogeneic testis cells


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, we demonstrated the successful production of allogeneic offspring using spermatogonial transplantation. Although the germ cells were able to complete meiosis after transplantation, adult recipients rejected allogeneic germ cells. On the other hand, complete spermatogenesis occurred from allogeneic germ cells when they were transplanted into immature pup testes. Allogeneic offspring were born from either type of recipient after intracytoplasmic germ cell injection or after natural mating following tolerance induction. Therefore, these results demonstrate that genetic information in the male germ cells can be propagated by immunologically incompatible surrogate animals.

The first experiment demonstrated that allogeneic donor cells can be rejected in adult seminiferous tubules. Although donor germ cells established colonies in the allogeneic seminiferous tubules, they could not complete spermatogenesis and were rejected by 4 mo after transplantation. This result was unexpected, because previous transplantation studies using rats or mice suggested that allogeneic spermatogonial stem cell transplantation within the same species is possible between nonimmunosuppressed, histoincompatible males [32, 35, 36]. However, the animals used in these studies were either random-bred [35, 36] or the donors and recipients shared major histocompatibility antigens [32]. Therefore, determining the effect of immunological factors from these experiments is difficult. Our results clearly show that histocompatibility between donors and recipients is a prerequisite for the successful spermatogonial transplantation in adult recipients.

Although rejection occurred by 4 mo after transplantation, the donor cells were able to complete meiosis by 2 mo after transplantation and to differentiate into round spermatids. Previous studies have shown that most transplanted germ cells are rapidly eliminated from the seminiferous tubule through phagocytosis by Sertoli cells and that only stem cells can colonize the recipient testis [15]; therefore, it is reasonable to believe that transplanted stem cells differentiate into round spermatids that can be used for intracytoplasmic germ cell injection. Intracytoplasmic germ cell injection is widely used to treat infertility in both animals and humans [2831], and it allows the production of offspring from testes without a level of spermatozoa sufficient for normal fertilization. This technique contributed to the success of the present study for two reasons. First, although intracytoplasmic germ cell injection was originally used with mature spermatozoa [30, 31], recent progress has allowed the production of healthy offspring using immature germ cells, such as round spermatids or even primary spermatocytes, for fertilization [37, 38]. Therefore, use of mature spermatozoa is not essential to obtain offspring. Second, unlike natural mating, intracytoplasmic germ cell injection requires only a small number of spermatogenic cells. Therefore, the completion of meiosis in a few donor cell-derived colonies was sufficient for offspring production in these experiments. Our results demonstrate that intracytoplasmic germ cell injection is a powerful method for overcoming immunological barriers in allogeneic spermatogonial transplantation.

A striking result of the second set of experiments was that immunosuppression allowed restoration of fertility in infertile recipients that had received histoincompatible donor germ cells. The long-term spermatogenesis in the recipients indicates continuous donor stem cell proliferation and normal differentiation in the allogeneic environment. It is noteworthy that only 2% of the donor testis cells, which is equivalent to the number capable of restoring fertility in syngeneic transplants [23], was sufficient to produce allogeneic offspring. Therefore, transplantation into immunosuppressed immature testis provides a system to produce allogeneic offspring by natural mating, which would allow stable offspring production and more experimental opportunities.

An important question posed by the second set of experiments is the immunological status of the prepubertal testis. The successful allogeneic spermatogenesis in the untreated testes does not appear to reflect the neonatal tolerance phenomenon [39]. In short, newborn animals are immunologically immature and accept allografts. However, the critical period is very short in mice, and the immune system is tolerant on the day of birth but loses this tolerance 1–2 days later [2]. The W pup recipients used in the present study were 5–10 days old and already capable of rejecting allogeneic bone marrow cells [40]; therefore, the successful spermatogenesis in these mice more likely resulted from the special immunological microenvironment or "immune privilege" in the testis rather than from the neonatal tolerance phenomenon. In addition, the observation that no spermatozoa were in the epididymis, despite the presence of complete spermatogenesis in the untreated testis, also suggests that the testis and epididymis have different immunological microenvironments. Perhaps the allogeneic germ cells were able to survive only in the special immunological environment of the testis but the allogeneic spermatozoa were rejected during transport from the testis to the epididymis.

On the other hand, the results obtained in immunosuppressed recipients clearly suggest the involvement of immunological factors in the development of allogeneic spermatogenesis. Although there may have been too few recipients in the present study to conclude the effect of each treatment, monoclonal antibody treatments (particularly anti-CD4 antibody) not only allowed transport of spermatozoa to the epididymis but also improved the level of allogeneic spermatogenesis in the testis. This ultimately resulted in the restoration of fertility in the recipient animals. Therefore, the results from these experiments are at odds with the hypothesis that the prepubertal testis is immunologically special. Currently, it is difficult to reconcile these apparently conflicting results, and more extensive studies using spermatogonial transplantation are required to examine the immunological environment of the seminiferous tubules. The unique immunological status of the prepubertal testis might be related to the anatomical or endocrinological differences from the adult testes, such as the absence of tight junction between Sertoli cells or endocrinological immaturity [41]. Understanding the mechanisms behind these differences will likely allow improvements in the level of spermatogenesis obtained in the allogeneic recipients.

The results reported here may be useful for the manipulation of male germ lines from many animal species. Spermatogonial stem cells are unique among adult tissue stem cells, because they can pass genetic information to the next generation. Furthermore, the recent development of spermatogonial transplantation has provided the ability to manipulate this valuable cell population [14]. For example, the technique can be used to preserve germ lines of economically valuable animals, older animals that are unable to breed naturally, and endangered animals [42]. In addition, it has now been demonstrated that spermatogonial stem cells provide an excellent vehicle for the genetic modification of male germ lines and the production of transgenic animals [32]. Although spermatogonial transplantation was originally developed in mice [14], the cell transfer technique is now beginning to be established in several other species, including humans [43, 44]. However, immunological incompatibility between the donor and recipient animals will be a clear impediment to such transplantation studies, because immunodeficient animals do not exist in most species. Our successful production of allogeneic offspring has demonstrated methods to overcome this problem and will facilitate the application of technologies established in the mouse system to a broad range of animal species. Thus, allogeneic spermatogonial transplantation can be used in the study of the unique immunological nature of the testis and can provide new possibilities in biotechnology.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Ms. Y. Doi for her technical assistance and Drs. S. Sakaguchi and H.-R. Rodewald for critical reading of the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by the Kanae Foundation for Life & Socio-Medical Science and the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan. Back

2 Correspondence: Takashi Shinohara, Department of Medical Chemistry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan 606-8501. FAX: 81 75 753 4388; takashi{at}mfour.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp Back

Received: 19 June 2002.

First decision: 10 July 2002.

Accepted: 5 August 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Barker CF, Billingham RE. Immunologically privileged sites. Adv Immunol 1977 25:1-54[Medline]
  2. Tung KSK. Regulation of testicular autoimmune disease. In: Desjardins C, Ewing LL (eds.), Cell and Molecular Biology of the Testis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993: 474–490
  3. Head JR, Neaves WB, Billingham RE. Immune privilege in the testis. I. Basic parameters of allograft survival. Transplantation 1983 36:423-431[Medline]
  4. Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED. Mammalian spermatogenesis. In Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED (eds.), Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1990: 1–40
  5. Sanberg PR, Borlongan CV, Saporta S, Cameron DF. Testis-derived Sertoli cells have a trophic effect on dopamine neurons and alleviate hemiparkinsonism in rats. Nat Biotechnol 1996 14:1692-1695[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Selawry HP, Cameron DF. Sertoli cell-enriched fractions in successful islet cell transplantation. Cell Transplant 1993 2:123-129[Medline]
  7. Sanberg PR, Borlongan CV, Othberg AI, Saporta S, Freeman TB, Cameron DF. Testis-derived Sertoli cells survive and provide localized immunoprotection for xenografts in rat brain. Nat Med 1997 3:1129-1132[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. D'Alessio A, Riccioli A, Lauretti P, Padula F, Muciaccia B, De Cesaris P, Filippini A, Nagata S, Ziparo E. Testicular FasL is expressed by sperm cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 98:3316-3321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bellgrau D, Gold D, Selawry H, Moore J, Franzusoff A, Duke RC. A role for CD95 ligand in preventing graft rejection. Nature 1995 377:630-632[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Griffith TS, Brunner T, Fletcher SM, Green DR, Ferguson TA. Fas ligand-induced apoptosis as a mechanism of immune privilege. Science 1995 270:1189-1192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Potten CS. Cell lineages. In: McGee JO, Isaacson PG, Wright NA (eds.), Oxford Textbook of Pathology, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992: 43–52
  12. Appelbaum FR. Haematopoietic cell transplantation as immunotherapy. Nature 2001 411:385-389[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Weissman IL. Translating stem and progenitor cell biology to the clinic: barriers and opportunities. Science 2000 287:1442-1446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Brinster RL, Zimmermann JW. Spermatogenesis following male germ-cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994 91:11298-11302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Nagano M, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Pattern and kinetics of mouse donor spermatogonial stem cell colonization in recipient testes. Biol Reprod 1999 60:1429-1436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Zambrowicz BP, Imamoto A, Fiering S, Herzenberg LA, Kerr WG, Soriano P. Disruption of overlapping transcripts in the ROSA beta geo 26 gene trap strain leads to widespread expression of beta-galactosidase in mouse embryos and hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997 94:3789-3794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Okabe M, Ikawa M, Kominami K, Nakanishi T, Nishimune Y. ‘Green mice’ as a source of ubiquitous green cells. FEBS Lett 1997 407:313-319[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Ogawa T, Aréchaga JM, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Transplantation of testis germinal cells into mouse seminiferous tubules. Int J Dev Biol 1997 41:111-122[Medline]
  19. Silvers WK. Dominant spotting, patch, and rump-white. In: Silvers WK (ed.), The Coat Colors of Mice. New York: Springer; 1979: 206–223
  20. Nishimune Y, Aizawa S, Komatsu T. Testicular germ cell differentiation in vivo. Fertil Steril 1978 29:95-102[Medline]
  21. Klein J. The major histocompatibility complex. In: Klein J (ed.), Immunology: The Science of Self-Nonself Discrimination. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1982: 284
  22. Geissler EN, Ryan MA, Housman DE. The dominant white spotting (W) locus of the mouse encodes the c-kit proto-oncogene. Cell 1988 55:185-192[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Shinohara T, Orwig KE, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Remodeling of the postnatal mouse testis is accompanied by dramatic changes in stem cell number and niche accessibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 98:6186-6191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ogura A, Inoue K, Matsuda J. Mouse spermatid nuclei can support full term development after premature chromosome condensation within mature oocytes. Hum Reprod 1999 14:1294-1298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Li Y, Li XC, Zheng XX, Wells AD, Turka LA, Strom TB. Blocking both signal 1 and signal 2 of T-cell activation prevents apoptosis of alloreactive T cells and induction of peripheral allograft tolerance. Nat Med 1999 5:1298-1302[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Benjamin RJ, Waldmann H. Induction of tolerance by monoclonal antibody therapy. Nature 1986 320:449-451[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Cobbold SP, Adams E, Marshall SE, Davies JD, Waldmann H. Mechanism of peripheral tolerance and suppression induced by monoclonal antibodies to CD4 and CD8. Immunol Rev 1996 149:5-33[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Ogura A, Yamamoto Y, Suzuki O, Takano K, Wakayama T, Mochida K, Kimura H. In vitro fertilization and microinsemination with round spermatids for propagation of nephrotic genes in mice. Theriogenology 1996 45:1141-1149
  29. Meng X, Akutsu H, Schoene K, Reifsteck C, Fox EP, Olson S, Sariola H, Yanagimachi R, Baetscher M. Transgene insertion induced dominant male sterility and rescue of male fertility using round spermatid injection. Biol Reprod 2002 66:726-734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol Reprod 1995 52:709-720[Abstract]
  31. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992 340:17-18[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Nagano M, Brinster CJ, Orwig KE, Ryu B-Y, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Transgenic mice produced by retroviral transduction of male germ-line stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 98:13090-13095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Brinster RL, Avarbock MR. Germ line transmission of donor haplotype following spermatogonial transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994 91:11303-11307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Transplantation of male germ line stem cells restores fertility in infertile mice. Nat Med 2000 6:29-34[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Jiang FX, Short RV. Male germ cell transplantation in rats: apparent synchronization of spermatogenesis between host and donor seminiferous epithelia. Int J Androl 1995 18:326-330[Medline]
  36. Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Brinster RL. Recipient preparation is critical for spermatogonial transplantation in the rat. Tissue Cell 1999 31:461-472[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Ogura A, Suzuki O, Tanemura K, Mochida K, Kobayashi Y, Matsuda J. Development of normal mice from metaphase I oocytes fertilized with primary spermatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998 95:5611-5615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Kimura Y, Tateno H, Handel MA, Yanagimachi R. Factors affecting meiotic and developmental competence of primary spermatocyte nuclei injected into mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 1998 59:871-877[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Brent L. Fetally and neonatally induced immunologic tolerance. In: Brent L (ed.), A History of Transplantation Immunology. London: Academic Press; 1997: 182–225
  40. Capel B, Mintz B. Neonatal W-mutant mice are favorable hosts for tracking development of marked hematopoietic stem cells. Exp Hematol 1989 17:872-876[Medline]
  41. Orth JM. Cell biology of testicular development in the fetus and neonate. In: Desjardins C, Ewing LL (eds.), Cell and Molecular Biology of the Testis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993: 3–42
  42. Avarbock MR, Brinster CJ, Brinster RL. Reconstitution of spermatogenesis from frozen spermatogonial stem cells. Nat Med 1996 2:693-696[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Schlatt S, Rosiepen G, Weinbauer G, Rolf C, Brook PF, Nieschlag E. Germ cell transfer into rat, bovine, monkey and human testes. Hum Reprod 1999 14:144-150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Brook PF, Radford JA, Shalet SM, Joyce AD, Gosden RG. Isolation of germ cells from human testicular tissue for low temperature storage and autotransplantation. Fertil Steril 2001 75:269-274[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, J. Lee, K. Inoue, N. Ogonuki, H. Miki, S. Toyokuni, M. Ikawa, T. Nakamura, A. Ogura, and T. Shinohara
Pluripotency of a Single Spermatogonial Stem Cell in Mice
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2008; 78(4): 681 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. G. M. Extavour
Evolution of the bilaterian germ line: lineage origin and modulation of specification mechanisms
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 47(5): 770 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J. Lee, M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, K. Inoue, N. Ogonuki, H. Miki, S. Toyokuni, T. Kimura, T. Nakano, A. Ogura, and T. Shinohara
Akt mediates self-renewal division of mouse spermatogonial stem cells
Development, May 15, 2007; 134(10): 1853 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Takehashi, M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, K. Inoue, N. Ogonuki, H. Miki, S. Toyokuni, A. Ogura, and T. Shinohara
Adenovirus-mediated gene delivery into mouse spermatogonial stem cells
PNAS, February 20, 2007; 104(8): 2596 - 2601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, K. Inoue, N. Ogonuki, H. Miki, S. Yoshida, S. Toyokuni, J. Lee, A. Ogura, and T. Shinohara
Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Enhances Formation of Germ Cell Colonies in Neonatal Mouse Testis Culture
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2007; 76(1): 55 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Tokuda, Y. Kadokawa, H. Kurahashi, and T. Marunouchi
CDH1 Is a Specific Marker for Undifferentiated Spermatogonia in Mouse Testes
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2007; 76(1): 130 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. Herrid, S. Vignarajan, R. Davey, I. Dobrinski, and J. R Hill
Successful transplantation of bovine testicular cells to heterologous recipients.
Reproduction, October 1, 2006; 132(4): 617 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Z. Zhang, S. Shao, and M. L. Meistrich
Irradiated Mouse Testes Efficiently Support Spermatogenesis Derived From Donor Germ Cells of Mice and Rats
J Androl, May 1, 2006; 27(3): 365 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, K. Inoue, J. Lee, H. Miki, N. Ogonuki, S. Toyokuni, A. Ogura, and T. Shinohara
Anchorage-Independent Growth of Mouse Male Germline Stem Cells In Vitro
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2006; 74(3): 522 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, N. Ogonuki, T. Iwano, J. Lee, Y. Kazuki, K. Inoue, H. Miki, M. Takehashi, S. Toyokuni, Y. Shinkai, et al.
Genetic and epigenetic properties of mouse male germline stem cells during long-term culture
Development, September 15, 2005; 132(18): 4155 - 4163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, H. Miki, K. Inoue, N. Ogonuki, S. Toyokuni, A. Ogura, and T. Shinohara
Long-Term Culture of Mouse Male Germline Stem Cells Under Serum-or Feeder-Free Conditions
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 985 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, S. Toyokuni, and T. Shinohara
Genetic Selection of Mouse Male Germline Stem Cells In Vitro: Offspring from Single Stem Cells
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2005; 72(1): 236 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, S. Toyokuni, and T. Shinohara
Transgenic Mice Produced by Retroviral Transduction of Male Germ Line Stem Cells In Vivo
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2004; 71(4): 1202 - 1207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. Kishigami, S. Wakayama, N. Van Thuan, and T. Wakayama
Similar Time Restriction for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection and Round Spermatid Injection into Activated Oocytes for Efficient Offspring Production
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2004; 70(6): 1863 - 1869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Z. Zhang, R.V. Short, T. Meehan, D.M. de Kretser, M.B. Renfree, and K.L. Loveland
Functional Analysis of the Cooled Rat Testis
J Androl, January 1, 2004; 25(1): 57 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Honaramooz, E. Behboodi, S. O. Megee, S. A. Overton, H. Galantino-Homer, Y. Echelard, and I. Dobrinski
Fertility and Germline Transmission of Donor Haplotype Following Germ Cell Transplantation in Immunocompetent Goats
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2003; 69(4): 1260 - 1264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, N. Ogonuki, K. Inoue, H. Miki, A. Ogura, S. Toyokuni, and T. Shinohara
Long-Term Proliferation in Culture and Germline Transmission of Mouse Male Germline Stem Cells
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2003; 69(2): 612 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/1/167    most recent
biolreprod.102.008516v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow