Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 14, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.006197
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/1/222    most recent
biolreprod.102.006197v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buehr, M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buehr, M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A.G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Buehr, M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A.G.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 222–229 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.006197
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Embryo

Rapid Loss of Oct-4 and Pluripotency in Cultured Rodent Blastocysts and Derivative Cell Lines1

M. Buehr2,a, J. Nicholsa, F. Stenhousea, P. Mountfordb, C.J. Greenhalghc, S. Kantachuvesirid, G. Brookerd, J. Mullinsd, and A.G. Smitha

a Centre for Genome Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ, United Kingdom b Stem Cell Sciences Ltd., Elsternwick, Victoria 3185, Australia c Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia d Medical Radiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, United Kingdom


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The POU transcription factor Oct-4 is essential for the pluripotent character of the mouse inner cell mass (ICM) and derivative embryonic stem (ES) cells. We analyzed the expression of Oct-4 during culture and establishment of cell lines from mouse and rat preimplantation embryos. Oct-4 was rapidly lost in primary outgrowths of the majority of cultured embryos prior to any evidence of morphological differentiation. Oct-4 persisted in only a minority of strain 129 cultures, which can go on to give ES cells. We used transgenic rats in which the dual reporter/selection marker ß-geo is under control of Oct-4 regulatory elements to investigate the effect of direct selection for Oct-4 expressing cells. Ablation of all cells occurred, consistent with complete downregulation of Oct-4. Without selection, in contrast, continuous cultures of morphologically undifferentiated cells could be derived readily from rat blastocysts and ICMs. However, these cells did not express significant Oct-4 and, although capable of differentiating into extraembryonic cell types, appeared incapable of producing fetal germ layer derivatives. Downregulation of Oct-4 appears to be a limiting factor in attempts to derive pluripotent cell lines from preimplantation embryos.

developmental biology, early development, embryo, gene regulation


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The POU-domain transcription factor Oct-4 [1] (also known as Oct-3) [2, 3] is associated with pluripotency and germline development in mammals [4, 5]. In the early mouse embryo, Oct-4 is expressed only in pluripotent lineages such as cleavage stage blastomeres, the inner cell mass (ICM) of the blastocyst, and the epiblast of the egg cylinder. At gastrulation, Oct-4 expression is downregulated in somatic lineages and maintained only in the primordial germ cells. Postnatally, Oct-4 is restricted to growing oocytes and spermatogonia. Pluripotent stem cells in culture, embryonic stem (ES) cells, embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells, and embryonic germ (EG) cells, all express Oct-4. This expression pattern reflects a key role for Oct-4 in the specification and maintenance of pluripotent cells both in vivo and in vitro [6]. Embryos homozygous for a targeted mutation of the Oct-4 gene fail to generate a pluripotent cell compartment and consequently cannot develop beyond the blastocyst stage [7]. For ES cells, ongoing expression of Oct-4 is essential, and conditional deletion results in loss of pluripotency and differentiation [8]

ES cells are derived from cultured mouse epiblasts [911]. Intact blastocysts or isolated ICMs/epiblasts are cultured on a feeder layer or in a medium containing the cytokine leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) [12, 13] and allowed to attach to the substrate and outgrow for several days. The resulting cell masses are then disaggregated and plated under the same conditions. Within a few days, colonies of ES cells may appear, which can be picked and cultured further. Protocols for the derivation of ES cells from mouse strain 129 are well established [14, 15]. Even in experienced hands, however, only about 30% of strain 129 blastocysts cultured according to standard derivation procedures will give rise to ES cells [9, 14]. This procedure does not give equally successful results with blastocysts of different mouse strains [16]. Most existing ES cell lines are from the 129 and C57BL/6 strains. It has proven difficult to derive ES cell lines from strains such as CBA (although derivation has been achieved with the use of specialized protocols [9]), whereas other strains such as FVB and NOD are highly refractory.

Considerable effort has been expended to derive ES cells from animals other than the mouse, and there are many reports of cell lines derived from blastocysts of a wide variety of species. However, these cells have rarely been shown to have significant differentiation potential, and there have been no substantiated reports of chimeras generated from blastocyst-derived cells of any species apart from the mouse [17, 18]. Iannaccone et al. [19] reported rat chimeras derived from "rat ES cells", but further analysis revealed that these animals were in fact rat-mouse chimeras [20, 21].

The failure to produce true ES cells from an animal as closely related to the mouse as the rat is puzzling. There are indications, however, of subtle differences between the pluripotent cells of the early embryo of the two species. Epiblasts isolated from rat embryos at late egg cylinder stages are capable of regenerating parietal endoderm [22], a capacity the mouse epiblast loses at the blastocyst stage [23]. It has so far been impossible to generate teratocarcinomas or isolate embryonal carcinoma cells from rat epiblasts or genital ridges, although such tumors and cell lines are readily derived from mouse material.

The inability to derive pluripotent cell lines when rat blastocysts are cultured according to a standard ES cell derivation protocol is not understood and suggests that although the derivation of ES cells from certain mouse strains is relatively straightforward the maintenance of pluripotency during derivation is a complex process. Given the prime role of Oct-4 in maintaining pluripotent status, continuous expression of Oct-4 through the initial stages of derivation may be necessary if pluripotent cell lines are to be established. Two separate enhancer elements have been identified upstream of the Oct-4 gene [24]. An enhancer distal to the promoter directs expression in the preimplantation embryo, primordial germ cells (PGCs), and the ES and EG cell lines, and a proximal enhancer is responsible for expression in the egg cylinder epiblast and P19 EC cells. However, the regulation of Oct-4 expression during attempted cell line derivation has not been described.

We generated transgenic rats in which the reporter/selection marker ß-geo is expressed under the control of the Oct-4 promoter and enhancers. Transgenic embryos were used to track the expression of Oct-4 and to evaluate the possibility of isolating rat ES cells by means of selection for Oct-4-expressing cells. Both the transgene and endogenous Oct-4 are rapidly downregulated in cultured blastocysts. This finding highlights a major barrier to pluripotent cell line derivation from both mouse and rat embryos.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animal Stocks

Most of the rats used in this project were of the inbred Fischer (F344) strain, although some observations were made on material from DA and Sprague-Dawley blastocyst outgrowths. Except where noted, the mice used were of the inbred 129/Ola and CBA/CA strains. Humane research use of animals was carried out under project licence PPL60/2300 issued by the U.K. Home Office.

Oct-4 ß-Geo Transgenic Rats

Transgenic Fischer rats were generated by pronuclear injection of a transgene consisting of the ß-geo construct (which combines a neomycin-resistance gene with a lacZ reporter [25]) under the control of 3.6 kilobases of the mouse Oct-4 upstream sequence including both proximal and distal enhancers [24]. Forty-one weaned rats were obtained from 460 injected embryos, and from these, 5 founders with an intact ß-geo sequence were identified. One of these animals produced offspring in which the expression of the lacZ reporter reflected the expression pattern of Oct-4 throughout pre- and postimplantation stages of the mouse. A homozygous line of these Oct-4 ß-geo rats was established and had normal viability and fertility.

Feeder Layers

Feeder layers were prepared from gamma-irradiated DIA-M (differentiation inhibitory activity, matrix-bound form) cells. These C3H 10T1/2 fibroblasts are stably transfected with an expression vector for the matrix-associated form of LIF [26]. These feeder layers successfully support the derivation and propagation of mouse strain 129 ES cell lines.

Medium

Blastocysts and cells were cultured in a Glasgow modification of minimal essential medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 15% fetal calf serum, penicillin-streptomycin, and human DIA/LIF (prepared in house) [15] at a concentration of 200 U/ml. In some experiments on rat cells, rat LIF [27] was used, with comparable results. EHS cell attachment matrix (Promega, Madison, WI) was added at a concentration of 140 µl/ml. In stem cell selection cultures, G418 was added to the medium at a concentration of 75 or 100 µg/ml.

Culture Protocol

The procedure for the derivation of rat blastocyst-derived cell lines was based on a previously reported method for the derivation of mouse ES cells [14]. Rat blastocysts from spontaneous matings were collected at 4.5 days postcoitum (dpc), the zona pellucida was removed with acid Tyrode medium, and the embryos were transferred to culture medium on a feeder layer of DIA-M cells in 15-mm wells. Cells were allowed to attach and outgrow for 4 days and were then mechanically disaggregated into small clumps and moved to fresh DIA-M feeders in culture medium. Colonies of morphologically undifferentiated cells were picked daily, roughly disaggregated by trituration, and moved to fresh feeders. A similar procedure was used to derive mouse cell lines, although in this case blastocysts were collected at 3.5 dpc, allowed to outgrow in culture for 5 days, and disaggregated in 0.025% trypsin.

This protocol supports the derivation of mouse ES cell lines from strain 129 blastocysts, although there are two significant differences from culture conditions used elsewhere [14, 15]: we included EHS cell attachment matrix in the medium, and we used DIA-M cells as feeders.

Immunosurgery

Immunosurgery was performed on 4.5-dpc rat blastocysts as described by Solter and Knowles [28] using anti-rat whole serum (Sigma) as the antibody and whole rat serum as the source of complement. Immunosurgically isolated ICMs were cultured as described above but were allowed to outgrow for 5–6 days before the first disaggregation.

Staining for ß-Galactosidase Activity

Embryos and blastocyst outgrowths were stained for ß-galactosidase activity according to the method of Hogan et al. [29].

Alkaline Phosphatase and SSEA-1 Staining

Alkaline phosphatase expression was determined by staining with a diagnostic kit for alkaline phosphatase activity in leukocytes (Sigma). The method outlined by Solter and Knowles [30] was used to stain cells for SSEA-1 (stage-specific embryonic antigen). The primary antibody was the monoclonal antibody MC-480, developed by Davor Solter and obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and University of Iowa) under contract NO1-HD-2-31244 from the NICHD.

In Situ Hybridization

Whole-mount in situ hybridization of cells was carried out according to the protocol of Rosen and Beddington [31]. The cells were fixed and processed in the wells in which they had grown, and the prehybridization step was allowed to proceed overnight. Digoxigenin-labeled antisense riboprobes were synthesised on templates of mouse cDNA sequences. Sense probes were also synthesized for use as controls, and all cultures tested with these were negative. The following mouse cDNA sequences were used.

Oct-4 The template was a StuI fragment corresponding to nucleotides 951–489 of GenBank accession no. X52437 [1]. In embryo whole mounts, this probe hybridizes with rat RNA exclusively in cells expected to express Oct-4, such as the ICM, epiblast, and primordial germ cells. The hybridization signal obtained with rat embryos is strong and comparable in intensity to that observed in mouse embryos.

H19 The H19 probe was described by Poirier et al. [32].

SPARC The full-length coding sequence of SPARC (osteonectin) was used (supplied by Ian Chambers [Centre for Genome Research, University of Edinburgh, Scotland]).

cdx-2 The cdx-2 cDNA was supplied by Hitoshi Niwa (Riken Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Japan) and was derived from nucleotides 257–1199 of GenBank accession no. 57420.

Alphafetoprotein Alphafetoprotein cDNA was kindly supplied by Philippe Gabant (Laboratoire du Biologie du Devellopement, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Gosselie, Belgium).

Cyclin D3 Cyclin D3 cDNA was kindly supplied by Pierre Savatier [33].

Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction

Cells were collected in PBS, and total RNA was prepared using an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was carried out on the RNA with a Superscript First Strand Synthesis system (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY) using random hexamers. The cDNA obtained was quantitatively analyzed with LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green 1 (Roche, GMBH Mannheim, Germany). For the determination of expression levels of Oct-4, amplification was carried out in the first instance as described by Vassilieva et al. [34] in which primers for mouse Oct-4 were used. Subsequently, new oligos were designed specifically for the rat material, and two separate PCRs were performed using primers for Oct-4 and ß-actin using the Quantitative LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green 1 system. Feeder cells and deionized water were included as blanks. The primers used for rat Oct-4 were 5'-AGGAAGCCGACAACAATGAG-3' and 5'-CTGATTGGCGATGTGAGTGA-3'. For rat ß-actin, the primers were 5'-CACTGGCATTGTATGGACT-3' and 5'-ACGGATGTCAACGTCACACT-3'.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Expression of the Oct-4 ß-Geo Transgene in Rat Embryos

The inclusion of a lacZ construct in the ß-geo transgene allowed us to trace the expression of the transgene through various stages of embryogenesis by staining embryos for ß-galactosidase. Transgene expression was readily evident in all cells of the morula and the early blastocyst. In the expanded blastocyst, expression was downregulated in the trophectoderm but remained high in the ICM (Fig. 1A). Expression was maintained in the epiblast of the egg cylinder (Fig. 1B) but was downregulated progressively as gastrulation proceeded. There was then a period of 2–3 days when no staining could be seen in any part of transgenic embryos. However, at 10–11 dpc faint staining was seen in a punctate distribution in the hindgut region, suggestive of re-expression in the PGCs, and subsequently staining was strong in cells of typical PGC appearance and distribution (Fig. 1C). We therefore concluded that apart from a brief hiatus in expression immediately after gastrulation, which may be associated with the transition between enhancers that occurs at this time [23], the pattern of expression of the transgene in vivo accurately reflects the expected expression pattern of Oct-4 in the rat embryo.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Expression of the Oct-4 ß-geo transgene in vivo. A) Transgene expression in the ICM of the blastocyst (one transgenic, four nontransgenic). Bar = 100 µm. B) Transgene expression in the epiblast of the egg cylinder (one transgenic, one nontransgenic). Bar = 200 µm. C) Transgene expression in the gonad. The pattern suggests expression in the primordial germ cells. Bar = 500 µm.

When blastocysts from transgenic rats were cultured according to the culture protocol described above and stained for lacZ activity, staining was readily detectable in the ICM of blastocysts in culture for up to 36 h. After that, although the size of the outgrowth increased considerably, the number of positive cells rapidly decreased until after 4–5 days of culture few or no stained cells remained (Fig. 2, A and B).



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Expression of the Oct-4 ß-geo transgene in vitro. Bars = 100 µm. A) Expression in a 4-day outgrowth. B) Expression in a 5-day outgrowth

Application of the Oct-4 Selection Strategy to the Derivation of Rat ES Cells

Previously we presented evidence that selection for Oct-4 expression in ES cell cultures can reduce differentiation and enhance self-renewal of stem cells [35]. This finding suggests that pluripotent cells may be induced to differentiate by the presence of differentiated progeny. It has also been reported that selection for Oct-4 transgene-expressing cells in cultures of blastocyst-derived cells can improve the efficiency of ES cell derivation [36]. Embryos from the Oct-4 ß-geo transgenic rats allowed us to test the efficacy of this method in deriving cell lines from rat embryos.

The inclusion of the neomycin analogue G418 in the culture medium is expected to remove differentiated cells but allow Oct-4-expressing cells to remain. Consistent with this expectation, when transgenic blastocysts or isolated ICMs are cultured under G418 selection (75–100 µg/ml G418) most cells rapidly die. Small colonies of morphologically undifferentiated cells can, however, persist in culture for up to three passages or for 2–3 wk. Their proliferation is very slow, and cells on the surface of the outgrowths continually differentiate and die. Over time, this process results in the differentiation and loss of all cells, and none survive culture for >3 wk. Thus, removal of differentiated cells from cultures of rat embryo cells probably is in itself not sufficient to inhibit differentiation of pluripotent cells or to maintain stem cells in a continuous state of self-renewal. The selection approach does, however, have some positive effect on the survival of undifferentiated cells in the presence of G418 because it allows these cells to persist for 2–3 wk, whereas all cells from nontransgenic blastocysts are eliminated within a few days.

Pattern of Oct-4 Expression in Outgrowths of Nontransgenic Rat and Mouse Blastocysts

Examination of blastocyst outgrowths from Oct-4 ß-geo transgenic rats revealed that transgene expression was rapidly downregulated during the culture period (Fig. 2, A and B). To determine whether this pattern reflected a downregulation of the endogenous Oct-4 gene or was due to anomalous expression of the transgene, we performed whole-mount in situ hybridization with blastocyst outgrowths of nontransgenic rats from the early outgrowth stage until after the first disaggregation. The pattern of Oct-4 mRNA as determined by in situ hybridization was identical to that observed after ß-galactosidase staining in the transgenic rats. Thus, expression of endogenous Oct-4 is not maintained in culture.

To determine whether the loss of Oct-4 was specific to the rat, we examined the expression of Oct-4 in outgrowths of blastocysts from several mouse strains (C57BL/6, 129, MF1, and CBA). Downregulation of Oct-4 occurred in the same pattern in rat and mouse, and the following description applies to both species and all strains examined.

Approximately 36 h after a blastocyst culture was begun, the embryo attached to the substrate and the cells of the trophectoderm began to outgrow. At this stage, the cells of the epiblast clearly expressed Oct-4 (Fig. 3A). After 3–4 days of culture, however, most of the cells in the mass of the outgrowth were negative for Oct-4, and expression was confined to a small number of cells in the center (Fig. 3B). By 5 days of culture, the cell mass had grown considerably in size, but the proportion of Oct-4-expressing cells appeared to have decreased (Fig. 3C).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Expression of endogenous Oct-4 in blastocyst outgrowths. Bars = 100 µm. A) Oct-4 expression in the ICM of a Fischer rat blastocyst after 36 h in culture. B) Oct-4 expression in Fischer rat blastocyst outgrowths after 4 days of culture. C) Oct-4 expression in the outgrowth of a mouse strain 129 blastocyst (5 days of culture)

In a few mouse outgrowths (~1% of cultures), patches of Oct-4-positive cells were seen growing out on the substrate. In most cases, however, the population of Oct-4-expressing cells did not increase during blastocyst outgrowth but rather diminished and often disappeared entirely after 5–6 days.

Positive and negative cells within the cell mass were morphologically indistinguishable. Both appeared undifferentiated, and it was impossible to discriminate between them in unstained cultures. Thus, although morphologically undifferentiated cells proliferated during the outgrowth stage, few or none of these cells retained Oct-4 expression for more than 5–6 days.

This general sequence of events was observed consistently in blastocyst outgrowths of DA, Sprague-Dawley, and transgenic and nontransgenic Fischer rats and C57BL/6, 129, MF1, and CBA mice. The pattern of loss of expression of Oct-4 in blastocyst outgrowths was then studied in more detail in cultures of strain 129 and CBA blastocysts.

Retention of Oct-4-Expressing Cells in Strain 129 and CBA Outgrowths

As blastocysts initially attached and outgrew (3–4 days of culture), cells expressing Oct-4 were present in almost all outgrowths. By 5 days, however, the number of outgrowths containing positive cells began to drop. This effect was more pronounced in cultures of CBA than in those of strain 129 blastocysts. By 6 days of culture, only 4% of CBA outgrowths retained expressing cells compared with 44% of strain 129 outgrowths (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Expression of Oct-4 in outgrowths of blastocyts of mouse strains CBA and 129

After outgrowths were disaggregated and replated, no expression of Oct-4 was ever seen in cultures of rat or CBA cells. In contrast, disaggregated strain 129 outgrowths frequently gave rise to colonies of Oct-4-positive cells with the distinctive morphology of ES cells. Colonies that resembled ES cells but did not express Oct-4 were not seen nor did any differentiated cells express Oct-4.

The efficiency of ES cell derivation can be improved if isolated ICMs, rather than intact blastocysts, are cultured and disaggregated [9]. We therefore examined the pattern of Oct-4 expression in outgrowths of immunosurgically isolated ICMs of mouse strain 129 and CBA embryos and rat embryos. The results were similar in all groups. After 5–6 days in culture, approximately half of ICM outgrowths retained a strong, uniform Oct-4 expression, whereas the remainder had lost Oct-4 expression entirely or expression was faint or patchy (Fig. 4, A and B). Oct-4-negative cells in such morphologically undifferentiated ICM outgrowths are unlikely to be accounted for by trophectoderm. Because every cell in an isolated ICM should express Oct-4 [37], this observation suggests that Oct-4 expression in cells of the ICM can undergo downregulation in culture.



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Expression of endogenous Oct-4 in ICM outgrowths. Bars = 100 µm. A) Fischer rat ICM outgrowths, 5 days in culture. One retains Oct-4 expression, but the other has lost it. B) Mouse strain 129 ICM outgrowths (5 days in culture), one with and one without Oct-4 expression

Culture of Blastocyst-Derived Cells

The mass of Oct-4-negative but morphologically undifferentiated cells remaining after 5 or 6 days of culture could be disaggregated and cultured further. Over several days, all the cells from disaggregated mouse outgrowths differentiated into giant cells and other H19-positive cells of undetermined types. We were unable to maintain cultures of undifferentiated Oct-4-negative cells from mouse blastocyst outgrowths, although colonies of Oct-4-positive ES cells may apppear in cultures derived from strain 129 blastocysts. In contrast, Oct-4-negative cells from rat outgrowths were maintained continuously in a proliferative and morphologically undifferentiated state (Fig. 5A). Cultures of these cells were established from both intact blastocysts and immunosurgically isolated ICMs.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Oct-4-negative cells derived from the rat blastocyst. Bars = 100 µm. A) Morphologically undifferentiated rat cells grow in rounded colonies. B) Rat blastocyst-derived cells stained for alkaline phosphatase. C) Rat blastocyst-derived cells stained with an antibody for SSEA-1. D) Rat blastocyst-derived cells express cdx2 (in situ preparation). E) Rat blastocyst-derived cells express cyclin D3 (in situ preparation)

There are strain differences in the efficiency with which these cells can be obtained. Over 90% of Fischer rat blastocysts (both transgenic and nontransgenic) gave rise to stable lines, but <10% of DA blastocysts yielded lines. We derived >50 lines from Fischer rat embryos and maintained 4 of these for >50 passages (equivalent to >4 mo). Three of these four lines were examined for euploidy at high passage numbers (>35). More than 80% of metaphase plates examined (>50 for each line) demonstrated a euploid complement of 42 chromosomes.

These rat cells resembled mouse ES cells in their general morphology and grew as rounded colonies of small, tightly packed cells that expressed alkaline phosphatase (Fig. 5, A and B). They also expressed SSEA-1, although this marker was expressed patchily, apparently only by cells in the interior of colonies (Fig. 5C).

If maintained for several days without passaging, these cells differentiated spontaneously. Rounded cells expressing SPARC and with the refractile character of parietal endoderm appeared in large numbers. Large H19-positive cells with the flattened morphology characteristic of trophoblast giant cells were also common, as were irregular masses of H19-positive cells whose identity was not clear. On aggregation, the cells did not form embryoid bodies and showed no evidence of germ-layer development but differentiated entirely into H19-positive cells.

These cells were factor and feeder dependent, growing poorly on feeders of primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts and not at all on gelatin. When LIF was removed from the medium, the cells could be passaged five or six times on DIA-M feeders but progressively differentiated. These cells were also dependent on the presence of EHS matrix in the medium; when this matrix was omitted, the cells rapidly differentiated. When colonies were passaged every 2 or 3 days on DIA-M feeders in medium supplemented with both LIF and EHS matrix, they could be maintained in a morphologically undifferentiated state.

In situ hybridization revealed that the undifferentiated cells did not express SPARC or alphafetoprotein (markers of parietal and visceral endoderm, respectively) but did express cdx-2 and cyclin D3 (Fig. 5, D and E), although not uniformly. Both of these markers are found in diploid trophectoderm [33, 38].

Vassilieva et al. [34] derived cells described as "ES-cell like" from rat blastocysts, and these cells were very similar to the cells we isolated. Vassilieva et al. reported that Oct-4 transcripts were detected in their cells by RT-PCR. We therefore carried out a quantitative RT-PCR analysis on our cultures. A low level of Oct-4 mRNA was detectable in one of three lines examined. However, even in this line we were unable to demonstrate Oct-4 transcripts by in situ hybridization, indicating that the levels of expression were not significant. Consistent with this, lines derived from Oct-4 ß-geo transgenic embryos did not show any expression of ß-galactosidase nor were they resistant to G418.

Production of Chimeras from Rat ICMs but Not from Derivative Cell Lines

We also investigated whether the cells could contribute to chimeras. First, we established a technique of generating rat chimeras. Freshly isolated Fischer (albino) ICM cells were injected under the zona pellucida of recipient eight-cell DA (agouti) embryos. Of 17 pups born from transferred embryos, 9 were coat-color chimeras. We then injected cells from our cultured lines (of the Fischer strain) into recipient DA embryos. Cells from four lines were used in separate experiments, two of low passage number (~10) and two at passages 20–30. Of the 82 rats born from injected embryos, none showed coat-color chimerism. Microsatellite analysis also failed to show any Fischer contribution to either adult or fetal tissues.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We tracked the pattern of Oct-4 expression in cultured rat and mouse embryos and demonstrated unexpected and rapid restriction of Oct-4 expression prior to overt differentiation. Initially, Fischer rat embryos transgenic for a ß-geo construct under the control of the Oct-4 promoter/enhancer region were used to facilitate the tracing of Oct-4-positive cells through the first stages of ES cell derivation and to test the efficacy of the Oct-4 selection strategy [35]. The pattern of expression of the transgene in these rats reflects the activity of the endogenous Oct-4 gene in vivo. However, the Oct-4 selection strategy is not sufficient for the isolation of rat ES cells. When cultured under selection, the cells in the putative stem cell colonies differentiate and are eliminated, although at a slower rate than in cultures of nontransgenic blastocysts under similar selection conditions. This finding is explained by the transcriptional downregulation of Oct-4 that occurs in cultured blastocyst outgrowths.

Oct-4-positive and Oct-4-negative cells in outgrowths are indistinguishable. Furthermore, loss of Oct-4 occurs in immunosurgically isolated ICMs without extensive cell death or overt differentiation. These observations argue in favor of direct downregulation of Oct-4 rather than selective death of Oct-4-expressing cells or overgrowth by a differentiated lineage and imply that Oct-4-positive and -negative cells represent epiblast before and immediately after loss of pluripotency. When derived from rat outgrowths, these Oct-4-negative cells can be readily maintained as stable cultures. They express the markers cdx-2 and cyclin D3, characteristic of trophectoderm, but do not express Oct-4 as determined by whole-mount in situ hybridization. Vassilieva et al. [34] described rat "ES-cell-like cells" derived in a similar way that appeared to express Oct-4 as determined by RT-PCR. These authors presented no evidence, however, that their ES-cell-like cells had any capacity for differentiation. We performed real-time quantitative RT-PCR on our cells and detected very low levels of Oct-4 transcript in one of three lines tested. However, even this line was not positive when analyzed by in situ hybridization. Thus, any expression of the Oct-4 gene in these cells must be at a very low level. The level of expression is likely to be critical, because a specific level of Oct-4 expression in an ES cell is essential to the maintenance of pluripotency [8]. In spite of the absence of Oct-4, both the cells described here and those of Vassilieva et al. [34] are similar to mouse ES cells in morphology, factor dependence, and expression of alkaline phosphatase and SSEA-1 (although the latter marker is expressed patchily). These findings suggest that some so-called ES-cell-like cell lines derived from blastocysts may represent cells that, although resembling ES cells superficially, lack sufficient Oct-4 expression to maintain pluripotency and are hence incapable of contributing to fetal germ layers.

The rat embryo-derived cells express at least two markers characteristic of trophectoderm derivatives and can spontaneously differentiate into trophoblast giant cells. This finding is consistent with a depletion of Oct-4 leading to diversion of epiblast cells into the trophectoderm lineage, as occurs when Oct-4 is acutely eliminated from ES cells [8]. However, although the cells appear capable of differentiation into trophoblast, they are distinguishable from trophoblast stem (TS) cells [39]. When cultured under conditions appropriate for TS cell derivation, i.e., on feeders in the presence of fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF-4), rat blastocysts can give rise to continuously proliferating colonies similar in appearance to mouse TS cells. Such TS cells characteristically grow as thin, flattened colonies (Fig. 6), and their propagation is dependent upon high concentrations of FGF-4. In contrast, the cells we have isolated grow as tightly packed clumps and in the absence of exogenous FGF-4. Furthermore, they are capable of generating at least one nontrophectoderm derivative, parietal endoderm. Therefore, they appear to represent a novel class of extraembryonic stem cell.



View larger version (174K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Rat blastocyst cells cultured in high concentrations of FGF-4 resemble colonies of mouse trophoblast stem cells. Bar = 100 µm

Although the rat embryo-derived cells of this study do not possess the potency of ES cells, they may still have practical applications. Because these cells retain diploidy after many passages and are transfectable (unpublished results), they could be used for targeted genetic modification and the nuclei could be transferred into recipient oocytes to generate transgenic rats. Fändrich et al. [40] reported blastocyst-derived rat cell lines with features in common with the cells we isolated. Their cells resembled mouse ES cells morphologically, expressed alkaline phosphatase, and were "mosaic" for SSEA-1 expression. No mention of Oct-4 expression was made nor of differentiation in vitro or generation of embryo chimeras. However, these cells appeared to give rise to hematopoietic derivatives when introduced directly into adult rats.

The present findings call into question the general assumption that ES cell precursors expand during the primary outgrowth stage. If Oct-4 expression is not maintained in primary outgrowths, ES cell precursors are probably lost at this stage. This fact may underlie the difficulties commonly experienced in deriving ES cell lines. Accordingly, the higher frequency and greater longevity of Oct-4 expression in strain 129 outgrowths may contribute to the permissiveness of this strain for ES cell derivation. If, as seems likely, true ES cells are derived directly from the Oct-4-expressing cells of the epiblast, one of the keys to successful derivation may lie in conditions or treatments that allow the maintainance of Oct-4 expression in epiblast derivatives throughout the outgrowth phase and beyond the first disaggregation. To this end, the analysis of Oct-4 expression in blastocyst outgrowths may be used as an assay system to screen factors and protocols for their possible utility in enhancing the efficiency of ES cell derivation. Such studies will be facilitated by the use of transgenic reporters such as the Oct-4 ß-geo construct described here or others such as Oct-4 GFP (green fluorescent protein).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Louise Anderson, Janice Young, Carolyn Manson, and staff for excellent animal husbandry and Deborah Hall, Annette Duwel, Dougie Colby, and Joanne Povey for technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and the Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom and by the European Community Framework V Programme. Back

2 Correspondence: Mia Buehr, Centre for Genome Research, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, West Mains Rd., Edinburgh EH9 3JQ, U.K. FAX: 44 131 650 3777; mbuehr{at}srv0.bio.ed.ac.uk Back

Received: 2 April 2002.

First decision: 30 April 2002.

Accepted: 1 July 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Scholer HR, Dressler GR, Balling R, Rohdewohld H, Gruss P. Oct-4: a germline-specific transcription factor mapping to the mouse t-complex. EMBO J 1990 9:2185-2195[Medline]
  2. Rosner MH, Vigano MA, Ozato K, Timmons PM, Poirier F, Rigby P, Staudt LM. A POU domain transcription factor in early stem cells and germ cells of the mammalian embryo. Nature 1990 345:686-692[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Okamoto K, Okazawa A, Sakai M, Muramatsu M, Hamada H. A novel octamer binding transcription factor is differentially expressed in mouse embryonic cells. Cell 1990 60:461-472[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Pesce M, Gross MK, Scholer HR. In line with our ancestors: Oct-4 and the mammalian germ. Bioessays 1998 20:722-732[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Pesce M, Scholer HR. Oct-4: gatekeeper in the beginnings of mammalian development. Stem Cells 2001 19:271-278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Niwa H. Molecular mechanism to maintain stem cell renewal of ES cells. Cell Struct Funct 2001 26:137-148[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Nichols J, Zevnik B, Anastassiadis K, Niwa H, Klewe-Nebenius D, Chambers I, Scholer H, Smith A. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU trascription factor Oct4. Cell 1998 95:379-391[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Niwa H, Miyazaki J, Smith AG. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat Genet 2000 24:372-376[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Brook FA, Gardner RL. The origin and efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997 94:5709-5712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Evans MJ, Kaufman M. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981 292:154-156[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1981 78:7634-7638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Smith A, Heath JH, Donaldson DD, Wong GG, Moreau J, Stahl M, Rogers D. Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature 1988 336:688-690[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Williams RL, Hilton DJ, Pearse S, Willson TA, Stewart CL, Gearing DP, Wagner EF, Metcalf D, Nicola NA, Gough NM. Myeloid leukemia inhibitory factor maintains the develiopmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature 1988 336:684-687[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Robertson EJ. Embryo-derived stem cell lines. In: Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Aproach. Oxford, UK: IRL Press; 1987: 71–112
  15. Nichols J, Evans EP, Smith AG. Establishment of germ-line competent embryonic stem (ES) cells using differentiation-inducing activity. Development 1990 110:1341-1348[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kawase E, Suemori H, Takahashi N, Okazaki K, Hashimoto K, Nakatsuji N. Strain difference in establishment of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Int J Dev Biol 1994 38:385-390[Medline]
  17. Gardner RL, Brook FA. Reflections on the biology of embryonic stem (ES) cells. Int J Dev Biol 1997 41:235-243[Medline]
  18. Prelle K, Vassiliev IM, Vassilieva SG, Wolf E, Wobus AM. Establishment of pluripotent cell lines from vertebrate species—present status and future prospects. Cells Tissues Organs 2000 165:220-236
  19. Iannaccone PM, Taborn GU, Garton RL, Caplice MD, Brenin DR. Pluripotent stem cells from the rat are capable of producing chimaeras. Dev Biol 1994 163:288-292[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Brenin D, Look J, Hubner N, Levan G, Iannaccone P. Rat embryonic stem cells: a progress report. Transplant Proc 1997 29:1761-1765[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Iannaccone PM, Taborn GU, Garton RL, Caplice MD, Brenin DR. Pluripotent embryonic stem cells from the rat are capable of producing chimeras (vol 163, pg 288, 1994). Dev Biol 1997 185:124-125[CrossRef]
  22. Nichols J, Smith A, Buehr M. Rat and mouse epiblasts differ in their capacity to generate extraembryonic ectoderm. Reprod Fertil Dev 1998 10:517-525[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Gardner RL. Regeneration of endoderm from primitive ectoderm in the mouse embryo: fact or artifact?. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1985 88:303-326[Medline]
  24. Yeom YI, Fuhrmann G, Ovitt CE, Brehm A, Ohbo K, Gross M, Hubner K, Scholer HR. Germline regulatory element of Oct-4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells. Development 1996 122:881-894[Abstract]
  25. Friedrich G, Soriano P. Promoter traps in embryonic stem cells—a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice. Genes Dev 1991 5:1513-1523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Rathjen PD, Toth S, Willis A, Heath JK, Smith AG. Differentiation inhibiting activity is produced in matrix-associated and diffusible forms that are generated by alternate promoter usage. Cell 1990 62:1105-1114[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Takahama Y, Ochiya T, Sasaki H, Baba-Toriyama H, Konishi H, Nakano H, Terada M. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of cDNA encoding a rat leukemia inhibitory factor: towards generation of pluripotent rat embryonic stem cells. Oncogene 1998 16:3189-3196[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Solter D, Knowles BB. Immunosurgery of mouse blastocyst. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1975 72:5099-5102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hogan B, Beddington R, Costantini F, Lacy E. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1994
  30. Soltor D, Knowles BB. Monoclonal antibody defining a stage-specific mouse embryonic antigen (SSEA-1). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1978 75:5565-5569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Rosen B, Beddington RSP. Whole-mount in situ hybridization in the mouse embryo: gene expression in three dimensions. Trends Genet 1993 9:162-167[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Poirier F, Chan CTJ, Timmons PM, Robertson EJ, Evans MJ, Rigby PWJ. The murine H19 gene is activated during embryonic stem cell differentiation in vitro and at the time of implantation in the developing embryo. Development 1991 113:1105-1114[Abstract]
  33. Wianny F, Real FX, Mummery M, van Rooijen M, Lahti J, Samarut J, Savatier P. G1-phase regulators, cyclin D1, cyclin D2 and cyclin D3: upregulation at gastrulation and dynamic expression during neurulation. Dev Dyn 1998 212:49-62[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Vassilieva S, Guan K, Pich U, Wobus A. Establishment of SSEA-1 and Oct-4-expressing rat embryonic stem-like cell lines and effects of cytokines of the IL-6 family on clonal growth. Exp Cell Res 2000 258:361-373[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Mountford P, Nichols J, Zevnik B, O'Brien C, Smith A. Maintenance of pluripotential embryonic stem cells by stem cell selection. Reprod Fertil Dev 1998 10:527-533[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. McWhir J, Schnieke AE, Ansell R, Wallace H, Colman A, Scott AR, Kind AJ. Selective ablation of differentiated cells permits isolation of embryonic stem cell lines from murine embryos with a non-permissive genetic background. Nat Genet 1996 14:223-226[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Palmieri SL, Peter W, Hess H, Scholer HR. Oct-4 transcription factor is differentially expressed in the mouse embryo during establishment of the first two extraembryonic cell lineages involved in implantation. Dev Biol 1994 166:259-267[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Beck F, Erler T, Russell A, James R. Expression of Cdx-2 in the mouse embryo and placenta: possible role in patterning of the extra-embryonic membranes. Dev Dyn 1995 204:219-227[Medline]
  39. Tanaka S, Kunath T, Hadjantonakis AK, Nagy A, Rossant J. Promotion of trophoblast stem cell proliferation by FGF-4. Science 1998 282:2072-2075[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Fändrich F, Lin X, Chai GX, Schulze M, Ganten D, Bader M, Holle J, Huang DS, Parwaresch R, Zavazava N, Binas B. Preimplantation-stage stem cells induce long-term allogeneic graft acceptance without supplementary host conditioning. Nat Med 2002 8:171-178[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S J Kimber, S F Sneddon, D J Bloor, A M El-Bareg, J A Hawkhead, A D Metcalfe, F D Houghton, H J Leese, A Rutherford, B A Lieberman, et al.
Expression of genes involved in early cell fate decisions in human embryos and their regulation by growth factors
Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 635 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. Kaji, J. Nichols, and B. Hendrich
Mbd3, a component of the NuRD co-repressor complex, is required for development of pluripotent cells
Development, March 15, 2007; 134(6): 1123 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. Gupta, C. Verfaillie, D. Chmielewski, S. Kren, K. Eidman, J. Connaire, Y. Heremans, T. Lund, M. Blackstad, Y. Jiang, et al.
Isolation and Characterization of Kidney-Derived Stem Cells
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 3028 - 3040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S Tielens, B Verhasselt, J Liu, M Dhont, J Van Der Elst, and M Cornelissen
Generation of embryonic stem cell lines from mouse blastocysts developed in vivo and in vitro: relation to Oct-4 expression
Reproduction, July 1, 2006; 132(1): 59 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
Y. Wang, C. F. Brooks, S. A. Jones, L. K. Olliff, M. Morgan, G. L. Speksnijder, C. Foley, and A. J. Harvey
Progress Toward the Culture and Transformation of Chicken Blastodermal Cells
Stem Cells, July 1, 2006; 24(7): 1638 - 1645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
L. J. Mullins, M. A. Bailey, and J. J. Mullins
Hypertension, Kidney, and Transgenics: A Fresh Perspective
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2006; 86(2): 709 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Brambrink, K. Hochedlinger, G. Bell, and R. Jaenisch
ES cells derived from cloned and fertilized blastocysts are transcriptionally and functionally indistinguishable
PNAS, January 24, 2006; 103(4): 933 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. M. Wobus and K. R. Boheler
Embryonic Stem Cells: Prospects for Developmental Biology and Cell Therapy
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2005; 85(2): 635 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
T. P. Zwaka and J. A. Thomson
A germ cell origin of embryonic stem cells?
Development, January 15, 2005; 132(2): 227 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Pan, B. Qin, N. Liu, H. R. Scholer, and D. Pei
Identification of a Nuclear Localization Signal in OCT4 and Generation of a Dominant Negative Mutant by Its Ablation
J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 37013 - 37020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A. Trounson
Stem cells, plasticity and cancer - uncomfortable bed fellows
Development, June 15, 2004; 131(12): 2763 - 2768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
L. J. Mullins, I. Wilmut, and J. J. Mullins
Nuclear transfer in rodents
J. Physiol., January 1, 2004; 554(1): 4 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Rathjen, J. M. Washington, M. D. Bettess, and P. D. Rathjen
Identification of a Biological Activity That Supports Maintenance and Proliferation of Pluripotent Cells from the Primitive Ectoderm of the Mouse
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2003; 69(6): 1863 - 1871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. Hochedlinger and R. Jaenisch
Nuclear Transplantation, Embryonic Stem Cells, and the Potential for Cell Therapy
N. Engl. J. Med., July 17, 2003; 349(3): 275 - 286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/1/222    most recent
biolreprod.102.006197v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions