Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 30, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.009977
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/3/1064    most recent
biolreprod.102.009977v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shinohara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Brinster, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shinohara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Brinster, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shinohara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Brinster, R. L.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 1064–1071 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.009977
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Testis

Restoration of Spermatogenesis in Infertile Mice by Sertoli Cell Transplantation1

Takashi Shinohara3,a, Kyle E. Orwiga, Mary R. Avarbocka, and Ralph L. Brinster2,a

a Department of Animal Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The niche is considered to play an important role in stem cell biology. Sertoli cells are the only somatic cells in the seminiferous tubule that closely interact with germ cells to create a favorable environment for spermatogenesis. However, little is known about how Sertoli cells develop to form the male germ line niche. We report here that Sertoli cells recovered and dissociated from testes of donor male mice can be microinjected into recipient testes, form mature seminiferous tubule structures, and support spermatogenesis. Sertoli cells from perinatal donors had a dramatically greater capacity for generating seminiferous tubules than those from adult donors. Furthermore, transplantation of wild-type Sertoli cells into infertile Steel/Steeldickie testes created a permissive testicular microenvironment for generating spermatogenesis and spermatozoa. Thus, our results demonstrate that the male germ line stem cell niche can be transferred between animals. In addition, the technique provides a novel tool with which to analyze spermatogenesis and might provide a mechanism for correcting fertility in males suffering from supporting cell defects.

developmental biology, gamete biology, male reproductive tract, Sertoli cells, spermatogenesis


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Several systems in the body, including epidermis, hematopoiesis, and spermatogenesis, are maintained by resident stem cells [1]. Stem cells are characterized by their capacity for self-renewal and their ability to produce daughter cells that proliferate and differentiate into one or more terminally differentiated cell types. Stem cells are generally located on the basement membrane of self-renewing tissues and are situated in a protected region called the niche [2]. When a stem cell divides in a niche, only one daughter cell can remain, and the other will be committed to differentiate unless another niche is available [2]. Thus, the niche provides factors that maintain stem cells and excludes factors that induce differentiation. Although the niche hypothesis was originally proposed to explain the behavior of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) [2], it is now extended to stem cells in other self-renewing systems, and the niche is considered to play a central role in regulating stem cell behavior [39] or transdifferentiation [10].

The majority of information regarding stem cell/niche interaction has been obtained through studies in the hematopoietic system, for which both a functional stem cell assay and partial in vitro reconstitution of the stem cell microenvironment are available [11, 12]. Using these techniques, it has been shown that stem cells require direct contact with stromal cells to facilitate survival, growth, and differentiation [12]. If HSCs are prevented from attaching to stromal cells, they die. Although these studies involving the hematopoietic system provided valuable information regarding stem cell/niche interaction, the in vivo location of the HSC niche in the bone marrow is relatively inaccessible, thus complicating experimental manipulations. The ability to transplant the bone marrow stromal cell compartment has been the subject of controversy [1214]. Despite its clear importance in stem cell biology, much remains unknown about the identity or characteristics of the niche in the hematopoietic and other self-renewing systems.

Spermatogenesis is a complex and highly productive system for generating male gametes, and it begins shortly after birth, with the transformation of gonocytes into spermatogonial stem cells and type A spermatogonia [15, 16]. These primitive cells produce differentiated progenitor cells in a stepwise, synchronous manner. By the time mature spermatozoa appear, approximately 35 days postpartum in mice, spermatogenic cells have established a unique cellular organization in the seminiferous tubule. Postnatal development of the spermatogenic compartment is accompanied by coordinate changes in the stem cell microenvironment [16]. The primary somatic cells of the seminiferous tubules are myoid and Sertoli cells that support and nourish germ cells, form the tubule wall, and define a niche for spermatogonial stem cells. Sertoli cells constitute approximately 3% of cells in adult mouse seminiferous tubules [17] and are the only somatic cell type that directly contacts germ cells.

Because Sertoli cells interact with many stages of germ cell differentiation, their role in regulating germ line development is complex. Their close association with spermatogonial stem cells suggests that Sertoli cells play a key role in maintaining the undifferentiated and pluripotent state of these stem cells while simultaneously supporting germ cell differentiation and spermatogenesis. Sertoli cell proliferation in the mouse reaches a peak shortly before birth and continues in the prepubertal testis until 10–12 days postpartum [18]. Formation of tight junctions between neighboring Sertoli cells occurs between 10 and 16 days postpartum [19], and this separates the seminiferous tubule into basal and adluminal compartments. Thus, development of the postnatal mouse testis is characterized by unique temporal and spatial differentiation patterns of both germ line and somatic cell types, and Sertoli cells create a special microenvironment for spermatogonial stem cells that is located on the basement membrane of the seminiferous tubule [20].

In the present study, we describe a novel technique to examine the stem cell microenvironment in vivo. Donor testis cells, containing stem cells and Sertoli cells, were transplanted into the seminiferous tubules of recipient mice. Tubule-like structures were produced and spermatogenesis occurred from transplanted stem cells supported by donor Sertoli cells, demonstrating that the stem cell niche of a self-renewing system can engraft to support complete differentiation from donor stem cells. Thus, this technique will be useful for understanding how the niche develops and interacts with stem cells in the testis, and it provides a new opportunity to manipulate the stem cell microenvironment.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Donor Mice and Cell Collection

In the first experiment, donor cells were obtained from the transgenic mouse line B6; 129S-Gtrosa26, designated ROSA26-129 (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME), that expresses the Escherichia coli LacZ (E. Coli lacZ) gene in many cell types, including all stages of spermatogenesis [21, 22]. Donor testis cells derived from this line can be unequivocally identified in recipient testes by staining with the ß-galactosidase substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl ß-D-galactoside (X-gal). In the second experiment, donor cells were obtained from the transgenic mouse line B6. 129S7-Gtrosa26 (ROSA26-B6), or from wild-type C57BL/6 mice. The ROSA26-129 and ROSA26-B6 donor mice were maintained on C57BL/6 x 129SvCP or C57BL/6 genetic backgrounds, respectively. Single-cell suspensions were prepared from donor testes obtained from perinatal (Embryonic Day 19 to 2 days postpartum) or adult (age, 4–8 wk) mice using an enzymatic digestion procedure, as previously described[23].

Recipient Mice and Analysis

In the first experiment, C57BL/6 x 129SvCP F1 hybrid mice (B6/129) were treated with busulfan (50 mg/kg i.p.) at 4–6 wk of age and were used as immunologically compatible recipients of ROSA26-129 donor testis cells. Approximately 10 µl of donor cell suspension could be introduced into each testis through the efferent ducts of busulfan-treated mice [23]. One month after busulfan treatment, the seminiferous tubules of some recipient mice were injected with approximately 10 µl of cadmium sulfate solution ([3 CdSO4 · 8 H20], 0.1 mg/ml of Cd (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) to remove endogenous Sertoli cells. Donor cell suspensions (~50 µl) were injected into cadmium-treated testes between 2 and 3 wk after the cadmium treatment; the donor testis cell volume that could be injected was increased after removal of endogenous germ and Sertoli cells.

In the second experiment, ROSA26-B6 or C57BL/6 donor testis cells were transplanted into immunologically compatible Steel/Steeldickie (Sl/Sld) recipients (The Jackson Laboratory), which lack endogenous spermatogenesis because of a Sertoli cell defect caused by a mutation in the Sl gene encoding the ligand for the c-kit-receptor tyrosine kinase [24, 25]. Seminiferous tubules of some Sl/Sld recipient mice were treated with cadmium sulfate to remove endogenous Sertoli cells. Because these mutant mice have smaller testes than wild-type mice, approximately 3 µl of cadmium sulfate solution (0.4 mg/ml) was introduced into each testis through the efferent ducts. A higher concentration of cadmium solution (0.4 mg/ml) was used to prepare Sl/Sld recipients compared to wild-type recipients (0.1 mg/ml), because Sertoli cells in Sl/Sld testis were more resistant to the effects of cadmium (data not shown). Two to three weeks after cadmium treatment, 15 µl of donor cell suspension were injected into each recipient testis.

For both experiments, recipient testes were recovered 2 mo after donor cell transplantation. Testes from mice that had received ROSA26-129 donor cells were fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde and stained with X-gal to visualize donor cell colonization [22]. Three histological sections (5 µm) were analyzed from the testes of each mouse, with 100-µm intervals between sections. Sections were stained with periodic acid-Schiff and viewed at a magnification of 400x to determine the extent of spermatogenesis in recipient mouse testes. The number and percentage of tubule cross-sections with minitubules, minitubules with donor germ cells (defined by blue staining and distinct morphology), and tubules/minitubules with spermatozoa were recorded for three sections from each testis. Student t-test was used to identify statistical differences in recipient testis weight. To test for differences in the number of minitubules, minitubules with germ cells, or minitubules with spermatozoa, Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact test was used.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Transplantation of Immature and Mature Testis Cells

To examine whether Sertoli cells can colonize recipient seminiferous tubules, donor cells were collected from the testes of perinatal and adult ROSA26-129 mice. Adult testes contain all types of spermatogenic cells and mitotically quiescent Sertoli cells; perinatal testes contain gonocytes and dividing Sertoli cells. Both donor cell populations (4 x 107 cells/ml) were microinjected into the seminiferous tubules of busulfan-treated recipient mice. Expression of the lacZ transgene in the germ cells and Sertoli cells of ROSA26-129 testes allowed donor cells to be identified in recipient testes by staining with X-gal. Donor cell colonization of recipient testes was evaluated 2 mo after transplantation. Spermatogenic colonies derived from adult testis cells appeared as distinctive blue segments (Fig. 1A). These colonies generally had a deep blue region in the center flanked by weakly stained regions that are the hallmark of expanding spermatogenic colonies (Fig. 1B). The dark blue region in the middle of the colony suggests multiple donor cell layers, and the pale blue regions at the colony margins indicate a monolayer network of proliferating spermatogonia, as previously described [26]. Histological study confirmed that these colonies consist of several spermatogenic cell layers and elongated spermatids (Fig. 1, C and D).



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Transplantation of mature and immature ROSA-129 testis cells into busulfan-treated mouse testis. Macroscopic (A and E), whole-mount (B and F), and histological (C, D, G, and H) appearance of recipient testes 2 mo after transplantation are shown. Recipient testes that received adult (A–D) and perinatal (E–H) donor testis cells were analyzed 2 mo after transplantation and are shown on the top and bottom, respectively. Recipient testes were stained with X-gal to visualize donor-derived spermatogenesis. Note the symmetrical appearance of colonies derived from adult donors with dark staining in the center and weak staining in the margins (B). In contrast, colonies derived from perinatal donors are irregular in appearance (F). Recipient mouse tubules are indicated by dashed lines (C, D, G, and H), and donor-derived minitubules are indicated by arrowheads (G and H). Minitubules (G and H) were observed in 27% of recipient seminiferous tubules transplanted with perinatal donor cells, compared to 0.9% from adult donor cells (not shown, see Table 1). Bar = 2 mm (A and E), 400 µm (B and F), 100 µm (C and G), and 40 µm (D and H); counterstain, nuclear fast red (C, D, G, and H)

Transplantation of perinatal testis cells generated two types of donor cell colonies in the recipient testis (regular [similar to the one shown in Fig. 1B from adult donors] and irregular [as shown in Fig. 1F] donor-derived spermatogenic colonies). Some colonies consisted of a blue stretch of tubule with weakly staining margins that appeared very similar to the germ cell colonies derived from adult donor cells. In contrast, many colonies were irregular in size and staining pattern (Fig. 1, E and F). These colonies were adherent to seminiferous tubules, because they did not change position when pressure was applied to the tubule. However, colonies derived from perinatal donors differed from typical adult-derived colonies, because they contained dense clusters of blue cells and lacZ staining ended abruptly at the colony margins (Fig. 1F). Colonies derived from perinatal donors were variable in length, thickness, and overall appearance. These areas of seminiferous tubules, however, appeared to be intact despite the unphysiological expansion of donor cell colonies. Histological analysis of the recipient testes revealed colonization by perinatal testicular somatic cells (Fig. 1, G and H). Tubular structures closely resembling normal seminiferous tubules were apparently generated by reassociation of donor (blue stain) Sertoli cells (Fig. 1G). This structure or "minitubule" was often embedded in clusters of donor-derived cells that appeared similar to fibroblastic or peritubular cells (Fig. 1H). Several areas of recipient tubules contained two donor-derived minitubules, where the tubule diameter was markedly increased compared to that of seminiferous tubules in wild-type mice (Fig. 1G). Most minitubules did not contain germ cells, but a few spermatogonial cells were occasionally observed on the basement membrane of the minitubules. These results suggest that Sertoli cells from perinatal testes can colonize and have the morphogenic capacity to form tubule-like structures after transplantation into germ cell-depleted testes.

Removal of Endogenous Sertoli Cells by Intratubular Injection of Cadmium

In previous studies, administration of cadmium destroyed various types of testicular cells, including both germ and Sertoli cells [27]. To improve the efficiency of donor Sertoli cell colonization, we attempted to remove endogenous Sertoli cells by cadmium treatment, thereby creating "space" for colonization by donor Sertoli cells. Recipient mice were first treated with busulfan to remove the endogenous germ cells (compare Fig. 2, A and E, with Fig. 2, B and F). Approximately 1 mo later, the mice were further microinjected with cadmium solution through the efferent ducts. Following an inflammatory reaction that lasted for the first several days [27; present study], a large portion of recipient seminiferous tubule content was replaced by cellular debris at approximately 2 wk after the cadmium treatment (Fig. 2, C and G). In gross appearance, cadmium-treated testes were smaller than untreated or busulfan-treated testes (Fig. 2, top and legend). Histological analyses revealed that cadmium injection completely destroyed most Sertoli cells in the seminiferous tubule and that tubules contained amorphous cellular debris (Fig. 2G). Relative to intratubular cells, the interstitial cells were less affected by 2 wk after cadmium injection, despite the initial manifestations of hyperemia and mild hemorrhage. By 4 weeks, however, the basal membrane of individual tubules appeared to disintegrate, and peritubular cells began to migrate toward the lumen of empty tubules (Fig. 2H). The tubules were generally shrunken, and some were completely collapsed. Fibroblast cells proliferated, predominantly in the interstitial area. These results indicate that cadmium treatment can effectively remove Sertoli cells in the seminiferous tubules.



View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Removal of endogenous Sertoli cells by cadmium injection. Macroscopic (top) and histological (bottom) appearance of C57BL/6 x 129 F1 hybrid wild-type control testes as well as testes lacking germ cells and Sertoli cells are shown. (A and E) Wild-type adult testis. (B and F) Busulfan-treated adult testis 1 mo after treatment. Note the absence of spermatogenesis. (C and G) Busulfan + cadmium-treated adult testis 2 wk after cadmium injection. Note the absence of Sertoli cells and the presence of cellular debris in the lumen. (D and H) Busulfan + cadmium-treated adult testis 4 wk after cadmium injection. Note that the seminiferous tubules are smaller in diameter and the basement membrane is beginning to disintegrate. The margins (dashed line) and lumen (L) of degenerating tubules are indicated, and migrating peritubular cells (arrow) were observed inside some degenerating tubules (D). Untreated (A), busulfan-treated (B), and busulfan + cadmium-treated (C and D) testes weighed 87.8 ± 4.6, 30.8 ± 1.8, and 22.8 ± 0.8 mg, respectively. Testis weight did not change between 2 wk (C) and 4 wk (D) after cadmium treatment. Bar = 2 mm (A–D) and 100 µm (E–H); hematoxylin and eosin (E–H)

Transplantation of Testis Cells into the Busulfan + Cadmium-Treated Recipient Testes

Two experiments were performed to examine the level of Sertoli cell colonization and donor-derived spermatogenesis in the busulfan + cadmium-treated recipient. Recipients were prepared by microinjecting cadmium solution into the seminiferous tubules of busulfan-treated mice. Perinatal and adult testis cells were prepared from ROSA26-129 animals, and equal concentrations of cells (108 cells/ml) were transplanted 2–3 wk after cadmium injection.

Recipient testes were stained with X-gal 2 mo after transplantation to assess donor cell colonization. Colonization of cadmium-treated recipients by adult donor cells was limited. Very few minitubules were observed in the recipient testes, and fibroblasts appeared to be the predominant donor cell type (Fig. 3B). Although donor-derived germ cells were occasionally observed in the minitubules in recipients of adult testis cells (Table 1), no spermatozoa were found. In contrast, weights of testes that received perinatal donor cells were significantly (P < 0.05) larger than those that received adult testis cells (Table 1), and the difference in appearance of testes that had received adult and perinatal testis cells was striking (Fig. 3, A and C).



View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Transplantation of adult (top) and perinatal (bottom) ROSA26-129 testis cells into busulfan + cadmium-treated recipient mouse testes. Macroscopic (A and C) and histological (B and D) appearances of recipient testes 2 mo after transplantation are shown. Note the limited colonization by adult donor cells (A) and extensive colonization by perinatal donor cells (C). Blue staining in D indicates that minitubules are comprised of donor testis cells. Arrowheads indicate basement membranes of two minitubules, and spermatogonial germ cells (arrows) can be identified by distinct morphology. Bar = 1 mm (A and C), 100 µm (B), and 30 µm (D); counterstain, nuclear fast red (B and D)


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Donor cell colonization in testes of busulfan + cadmium-treated, wild-type recipients

Perinatal donor testis cells covered greater than half the surface area (Fig. 3C) and appeared as dark-stained, thick tubules, whereas adult donor cells covered a significantly smaller area and their colonization sometimes appeared as thin blue segments (Fig. 3A). Histological analysis revealed that minitubule formation in busulfan + cadmium-treated recipient testes by perinatal donor cells was significantly (P < 0.0001) greater than that by adult donor cells (Fig. 3D and Table 1). The size of the minitubules varied, the pattern was irregular, and more than one minitubule was often found in a single recipient tubule (Fig. 3D). Donor-derived germ cells of various differentiation stages were observed in recipient tubules. Most minitubules with germ cells contained premeiotic, spermatogonial cells, but occasionally, areas that contained spermatocytes or spermatids were observed. The percentage of minitubules with germ cells was significantly (P = 0.0002) greater for busulfan + cadmium-treated recipients of perinatal donor testis cells than for recipients of adult cells (Table 1). Rarely, mature spermatozoa could also be identified (Table 1). Because gonocytes are the only germ cells in the perinatal donor cell population and busulfan + cadmium-treated recipients are devoid of endogenous Sertoli and germ cells, these results strongly suggest that spermatogenesis was initiated and differentiation occurred from donor gonocytes in donor cell-derived minitubules after transplantation. Minitubules appear to be comprised of donor myoid, Sertoli, and germ cells. Blue staining indicates donor origin. Myoid and germ cells were recognized by distinct morphology, and generation of spermatogenesis provided functional confirmation that Sertoli cells were also present. These results demonstrate that perinatal donor cells reconstitute the spermatogonial stem cell niche in busulfan + cadmium-treated recipient testes more efficiently than adult donor cells.

Transplantation of Testis Cells into Sl/Sld testes

The success with Sertoli cell transplantation led us to examine whether the technique could generate spermatogenesis in congenitally infertile Sl/Sld mice. Testes of Sl/Sld mice have few germ cells, and endogenous Sertoli cells cannot support spermatogenesis because of the lack of the membrane-bound form of stem cell factor on Sertoli cells [25]. Therefore, any spermatogenesis in Sl/Sld recipients indicates colonization by healthy donor Sertoli cells and provides definitive evidence for transplantation and reconstitution of the spermatogonial stem cell niche. A two-by-two factorial experiment was used in which donor cells from perinatal or adult testes were transplanted into untreated or cadmium-treated Sl/Sld recipients. Adult donor testis cells were collected from ROSA26-B6 mice and perinatal testis cells from wild-type B6 or ROSA26-B6 mice, because the number of cells that could be collected from perinatal testes was limited and wild-type B6 donors were more readily available. Donor cells from either immature or mature testes were transplanted at a concentration of 108 cells/ml.

Two months after transplantation, some of the recipient testes were recovered and stained for ß-galactosidase activity. When adult ROSA26-B6 testis cells were transplanted into untreated Sl/Sld recipient testes, transplanted donor cells formed networks or patches on the basal membrane, which is a typical cellular arrangement indicative of undifferentiated spermatogonia [26], and no differentiation occurred toward the adluminal compartment of the recipient seminiferous tubule (Fig. 4, A and B). Histological examination of cadmium-treated recipients revealed that most colonizing adult cells appeared to be fibroblastic, and no spermatogenesis was noted in any of the recipients (Table 2). Thus, these results show that adult donor cells cannot initiate spermatogenesis in Sl/Sld recipients, which is in agreement with the results of previous studies [20].



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Generation of spermatogenesis in the infertile Sl/Sld testes by Sertoli cell transplantation. (A) Macroscopic appearance of untreated Sl/Sld testis 2 mo after transplantation of adult ROSA26-B6 testis cells. (B) Higher-magnification view of tubules in A showing the colonization pattern of adult ROSA26-B6 germ cells in untreated Sl/Sld recipient testis. Note the absence of vertical differentiation of donor cells. Blue donor cells are found only on the basement membrane. (C) Macroscopic appearance of cadmium-treated Sl/Sld testis 2 mo after transplantation of perinatal ROSA26-B6 testis cells. Dark colonies are present in the recipient testis, indicating the vertical differentiation of donor cells. D) Spermatogenesis in the testis of a cadmium-treated Sl/Sld mouse that received perinatal C57BL/6 testis cells. Note the normal-appearing spermatogenesis and the presence of mature spermatozoa. Bar = 2 mm (A and C), 250 µm (B), and 100 µm (D); periodic acid-Schiff and hematoxylin


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Donor cell colonization in testes of untreated and cadmium-treated SI/SId recipient mice

In contrast to adult donors, perinatal donor cells showed extensive colonization in Sl/Sld recipients. Perinatal cells transplanted in untreated Sl/Sld recipients were able to make minitubules in 4 of 12 testes (33%), and normal spermatogenesis was found in 5 of 12 testes (42%) (Table 2). The donor cell colonization and level of spermatogenesis were markedly enhanced in cadmium-treated Sl/Sld recipients (Fig. 4C), in which 11 of 12 testes (92%) contained minitubules and 8 of 12 testes (67%) contained tubules with spermatozoa (Table 2). Whereas the number of tubules with minitubules was higher in cadmium-treated than in untreated recipients (55% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.0001), the proportion of minitubules with germ cells was not different (P = 0.3) (Table 2). In addition, a smaller percentage of minitubules contained spermatozoa in cadmium-treated recipients (3%) compared to untreated (35%) recipients (P < 0.0001), although the former contained spermatogenesis in areas where no minitubules were apparent and, overall, cadmium-treated testes contained more tubules with spermatozoa than untreated recipients (1.8% vs. 0.4%, data not shown). Endogenous Sertoli cells in Sl/Sld recipient testes cannot support spermatogenesis; therefore, these results indicate that transplanted perinatal wild-type Sertoli cells functionally reconstituted the recipient seminiferous tubule and supported spermatogenesis (Fig. 4D). Thus, the spermatogonial stem cell niche can be transplanted, can correct the defective microenvironment of congenitally infertile recipient animals, and can generate donor-derived spermatogenesis, which is enhanced by previous treatment of the recipient with cadmium.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In many self-renewing systems of the body, supporting cells that constitute the local microenvironment are considered to play a key role in the biology of stem cells [1, 2]. However, the difficulty in studying and manipulating stem cells and their surroundings in vivo has made it impossible to define the structure and function of stem cell niches. In general, supporting cells in self-renewing tissues/systems are remarkably resistant to detrimental environmental factors and do not easily allow experimental manipulations. Whereas stem cells can reconstitute entire organs after transplantation into irradiated or carcinogen-treated recipients [11, 28, 29], it remains controversial whether transplanting the niche is possible and whether conditioning of recipients can facilitate such transplantation [1214].

In the present study, spermatogonial stem cell/niche interactions in the mouse testis were evaluated functionally by transplantation of wild-type perinatal and adult testis cells into four types of recipients: 1) busulfan-treated, wild-type mice that are devoid of endogenous germ cells but have an intact and functional Sertoli cell compartment; 2) busulfan + cadmium-treated, wild-type mice that are essentially devoid of germ cells and Sertoli cells; 3) Sl mice that cannot support spermatogenesis because of a Sertoli cell defect and contain only undifferentiated germ cells; and 4) cadmium-treated Sl mice that are devoid of Sertoli and germ cells. Spermatogenesis in recipient testes depends on the functional activities of both the germ line stem cell and Sertoli cell (i.e., niche) compartments. The results of these studies clearly show that donor testis cells can reconstitute the tubular microenvironment by producing minitubules within the luminae or re-establishing Sertoli cells on the basement membrane of host seminiferous tubules. This morphogenic activity was enhanced when perinatal donor cells were used and endogenous Sertoli cells were removed by cadmium treatment of recipient tubules (Tables 1 and 2); in some cases, complete spermatogenesis was restored (Tables 1 and 2 and Fig. 4D). The minitubules appeared similar to structures reported by Jiang and Short [30, 31], who transplanted fetal and neonatal rat testis cells into the seminiferous tubules of busulfan-treated, wild-type recipient rat testes and coined the term minitubule. Functional reconstitution of the stem cell niche from transplanted donor Sertoli cells was clearly demonstrated when Sl mutant mice were used as recipients. Endogenous Sertoli cells are defective in this model, so spermatogenesis could only occur among donor Sertoli cells. Donor-derived spermatogenesis was most often found in minitubules, but occasionally, donor cells colonized the basement membrane of cadmium-cleared recipient seminiferous tubules and produced morphologically normal spermatogenesis (Table 2 and Fig. 4D). Because any committed progenitor germ cells in the donor population would have differentiated to mature sperm by 35 days in mice [15], spermatogenesis in recipient testes 2 mo after transplantation must have originated from spermatogonial stem cells, indicating successful reconstitution of the stem cell niche.

The ability to transplant the spermatogonial stem cell niche depended on both donor and recipient factors. Donor cells prepared from perinatal testes in the present experiment efficiently generated spermatogenesis after transplantation into busulfan + cadmium-treated recipients. Differences in the stem cell and/or Sertoli cell populations are two factors that might explain the superiority of the perinatal donor testis cell population compared to the adult donor population. Because stem cells are the only cell type in the testis with the capacity to produce and maintain colonies of spermatogenesis, stem cell activity in the transplanted population is an important determinant for successful donor-derived spermatogenesis. Modest differences in stem cell activity were observed in previous studies, demonstrating that neonatal testes contain an approximately 50% higher stem cell concentration than adult testes [9, 26] and that colonies derived from neonatal stem cells are approximately 50% larger than adult-derived colonies by 3 mo after transplantation [9]. Developmental differences in Sertoli cell activity may be the major factor affecting the success of stem cell and niche engraftment in recipient testes. Whereas mature Sertoli cells are mitotically quiescent [15] and constitute only 3% of cells in adult seminiferous tubules [17], immature Sertoli cells are proliferative [16] and comprise >80% of cells in perinatal seminiferous tubules [17]. Therefore, compared to adult testes, perinatal testes appear to have a slight advantage in stem cell activity but a large advantage in Sertoli cell number and proliferative activity, and the Sertoli cell factors likely played the major role in enhancing donor cell-derived spermatogenesis in recipient seminiferous tubules.

A second critical factor was the conditioning of recipients. Although immature Sertoli cells were able to colonize a germ cell-deficient environment in the seminiferous tubules of busulfan-treated mice, removal of endogenous Sertoli cells by cadmium treatment significantly enhanced the colonization level. Cadmium has long been known to cause testicular damage and infertility in a variety of species [27], and subcutaneous or intratesticular injection of small amounts of cadmium are effective. Cadmium is thought to act on the lining of the blood vessels of the pampiniform plexus [27], causing acute inflammation and necrosis of the testicular cells. Whereas other antifertility treatments, such as radiation or alkylating agents, remove only mitotic cells (i.e., germ cells), cadmium can destroy all cell types in the seminiferous tubules, including Sertoli cells, which are quiescent in the adult testis [15] and, therefore, refractory to antimitotic treatments. In the present experiments, we found sequential busulfan and cadmium treatments to be effective in removing germ cells and Sertoli cells from the seminiferous tubule. Because removal of endogenous stromal cells has not been possible in other self-renewing systems, the availability of both germ cell and Sertoli cell toxicants provides a unique opportunity to modify the stem cell microenvironment in the testis and enables transplantation of the spermatogonial stem cell niche.

Successful donor-derived spermatogenesis in busulfan + cadmium-treated recipients indicates that 1) niche can be recreated despite dissociation of testis tubules into single cells; 2) donor Sertoli cell colonization is increased by creating "space" in the recipient (by cadmium treatment), as previously demonstrated for stem cell transplantation [32, 33]; and 3) niche function is demonstrated by the presence of complete donor-derived spermatogenesis in busulfan + cadmium-cleared seminiferous tubules. Whereas Sertoli cell colonization had a normal appearance in some tubules, most resulted in minitubule formation, as previously described for the rat [30, 31]. Interestingly, mature spermatozoa appeared in a limited number of minitubules, with many minitubules containing only immature germ cells. The low efficiency of spermatogenesis in minitubules might be explained by environmental differences between wild-type seminiferous tubules and donor-derived reconstructed minitubules. For example, in the adult testis, a species-specific, fixed, numerical relationship exists between the germ cells and Sertoli cells [16]. Therefore, the inefficient spermatogenesis in minitubules may reflect an imbalance between germ cell and Sertoli cell numbers. In addition, the heterogeneous donor testis cell population contained Leydig and myoid cells that are not normally found in the seminiferous epithelial environment. These cells may have interfered with the balance between germ cell and endocrine compartments, which is essential for spermatogonial differentiation [34] and Sertoli cell function [35]. Thus, both the relative numbers and types of donor cells likely are responsible for the inefficient sperm production in the minitubules, and identification of factors contributing to spermatogenesis will provide insight regarding how stem cell/niche interactions develop in the testis. Because methods to isolate individual types of testis cells are now available [17, 36], transplantation of specific cell types from different maturational stages or variation of the number and proportion of donor cell populations would likely impact the degree of donor-derived spermatogenesis and allow new experimental possibilities to investigate germ cell/niche interactions in the testis.

Clinically, the present technique may be useful for treatment of male infertility, which can be caused either by defective germ cells or environment. Because differentiation of germ cells depends on close interaction with Sertoli cells, a defect of either would disrupt spermatogenesis and cause infertility. Whereas several assisted reproductive techniques, such as in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection [37], are now available for patients with few spermatozoa, infertile patients with Sertoli cell defects have limited options. If the Sertoli cell defect can be attributed to a deficiency in a single gene, then it might be corrected by application of gene therapy, as recently demonstrated using adenovirus and lentivirus to deliver the Sl gene into the Sertoli cells of infertile Sl/Sld mutant mice [38, 39]. If the defect is multigenic or the genetic basis is not known, then our results may provide a new opportunity to replace defective Sertoli cells with healthy Sertoli cells, and reintroduction of the original stem cell population may initiate normal spermatogenesis in the testes of these patients. Stem cells in testes with defective environments may retain the capacity to generate spermatogenesis under the appropriate conditions. Recent studies have demonstrated that spermatogonial stem cells recovered from testes of infertile Sl/Sld mice could produce spermatozoa and offspring after transplantation to a healthy environment [40]. Thus, Sertoli cell transplantation will be useful not only for the study of the stem cell niche but also may provide an approach for the treatment of male infertility.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We appreciate the assistance of C. Freeman and R. Naroznowski with animal maintenance and experimentation and of J. Hayden with photography.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 T.S. was supported by the Japan Society for Promotion of Science. Histological sections were produced in the University of Pennsylvania Institute for Human Gene Therapy Morphology Core (grant 5-P30-DK-47747-07). Financial support for the research was from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant 36504, the Commonwealth and General Assembly of Pennsylvania, and the Robert J. Kleberg, Jr., and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation. Back

2 Corespondence: R.L. Brinster, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3850 Baltimore Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104. FAX: 215 898 0667 Back

3 Current address: Department of Medical Chemistry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan 606-8501 Back

Received: 2 August 2002.

First decision: 26 August 2002.

Accepted: 16 October 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Potten CS. Cell lineages. In: McGee JO, Isaacson PG, Wright NA (eds.), Oxford Textbook of Pathology, vol. 1. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press; 1992: 43–52
  2. Schofield R. The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells 1978 4:7-25[Medline]
  3. Williams ED, Lowes AP, Williams D, Williams GT. A stem cell niche theory of intestinal crypt maintenance based on a study of somatic mutation in colonic mucosa. Am J Pathol 1992 141:773-776[Abstract]
  4. Kiger AA, Jones DL, Schulz C, Rogers MB, Fuller MT. Stem cell self-renewal specified by JAK-STAT activation in response to a support cell cue. Science 2001 294:2542-2545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Meng X, Lindahl M, Hyvonen ME, Parvinen M, de Rooij DG, Hess MW, Raatikainen-Ahokas A, Sainio K, Rauvala H, Lakso M, Pichel JG, Westphal H, Saarma M, Sariola H. Regulation of cell fate decision of undifferentiated spermatogonia by GDNF. Science 2000 287:1489-1493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Tran J, Brenner TJ, DiNardo S. Somatic control over the germline stem cell lineage during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Nature 2000 407:754-757[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Xie T, Spradling AC. A niche maintaining germ line stem cells in the drosophila ovary. Science 2000 290:328-330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Tulina N, Matunis E. Control of stem cell self-renewal in Drosophila spermatogenesis by JAK-STAT signaling. Science 2001 294:2546-2549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Shinohara T, Orwig KE, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Remodeling of the postnatal mouse testis is accompanied by dramatic changes in stem cell number and niche accessibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 98:6186-6191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bjornson CR, Rietze RL, Reynolds BA, Magli MC, Vescovi AL. Turning brain into blood: a hematopoietic fate adopted by adult neural stem cells in vivo. Science 1999 283:534-537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Till JE, McCulloch EA. A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat Res 1961 14:213-222[Medline]
  12. Dexter TM. Is the marrow stroma transplantable?. Nature 1982 298:222-223[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Keating A, Singer JW, Killen PD, Striker GE, Salo AC, Sanders J, Thomas ED, Thorning D, Fialkow PJ. Donor origin of the in vitro haematopoietic microenvironment after marrow transplantation in man. Nature 1982 298:280-283[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Simmons PJ, Przepiorka D, Thomas ED, Torok-Storb B. Host origin of marrow stromal cells following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Nature 1987 328:429-432[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED. Mammalian spermatogenesis. In: Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED (eds.), Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis, 1st ed. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1990: 1–40
  16. Orth JM. Cell biology of testicular development in the fetus and neonate. In: Desjardins C, Ewing LL (eds.), Cell and Molecular Biology of the Testis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993: 3–42
  17. Bellvé AR. Purification, culture, and fractionation of spermatogenic cells. Methods Enzymol 1993 225:84-113[Medline]
  18. De Kretser DM, Kerr JB. The cytology of the testis. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1994: 1177–1290
  19. Gondos B, Berndston WE. Postnatal and pubertal development. In: Russell LD, Griswold MD (eds.), The Sertoli Cell, 1st ed. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1993: 115–154
  20. Ohta H, Yomogida K, Dohmae K, Nishimune Y. Regulation of proliferation and differentiation in spermatogonial stem cells: the role of c-kit and its ligand SCF. Development 2000 127:2125-2131[Abstract]
  21. Zambrowicz BP, Imamoto A, Fiering S, Herzenberg LA, Kerr WG, Soriano P. Disruption of overlapping transcripts in the ROSA beta geo 26 gene trap strain leads to widespread expression of beta-galactosidase in mouse embryos and hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997 94:3789-3794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Nagano M, Brinster RL. Spermatogonial transplantation and reconstitution of donor cell spermatogenesis in recipient mice. APMIS 1998 106:47-57[Medline]
  23. Ogawa T, Aréghaga JM, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Transplantation of testis germinal cells into mouse seminiferous tubules. Int J Dev Biol 1997 41:111-122[Medline]
  24. Silvers WK. Steel, flexed-tailed, splotch, and varitint-waddler. In: Silvers WK (ed.), The Coat Colors of Mice, 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1979: 242–267
  25. Flanagan JG, Chan DC, Leder P. Transmembrane form of the kit ligand growth factor is determined by alternative splicing and is missing in the Sld mutant. Cell 1991 64:1025-1035[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Nagano M, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Pattern and kinetics of mouse donor spermatogonial stem cell colonization in recipient testes. Biol Reprod 1999 60:1429-1436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Parizek J. Sterilization of the male by cadmium salts. J Reprod Fertil 1960 1:294-309
  28. Brinster RL, Avarbock MR. Germline transmission of donor haplotype following spermatogonial transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994 91:11303-11307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Brinster RL, Zimmermann JW. Spermatogenesis following male germ-cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994 91:11298-11302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Jiang FX, Short RV. Male germ cell transplantation in rats: apparent synchronization of spermatogenesis between host and donor seminiferous epithelia. Int J Androl 1995 18:326-330[Medline]
  31. Jiang FX, Short RV. Different fate of primordial germ cells and gonocytes following transplantation. APMIS 1998 106:58-62[Medline]
  32. Brecher G, Ansell JD, Micklem HS, Tjio JH, Cronkite EP. Special proliferative sites are not needed for seeding and proliferation of transfused bone marrow cells in normal syngeneic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1982 79:5085-5087[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Shinohara T, Orwig KE, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Germ line stem cell competition in postnatal mouse testes. Biol Reprod 2002 66:1491-1497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Meistrich ML. Hormonal stimulation of the recovery of spermatogenesis following chemo- or radiotherapy. APMIS 1998 106:37-45[Medline]
  35. Jégou B, Laws AO, de Kretser DM. The effect of cryptorchidism and subsequent orchidopexy on testicular function in adult rats. J Reprod Fertil 1983 69:137-145[Abstract]
  36. Shinohara T, Orwig KE, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Spermatogonial stem cell enrichment by multiparameter selection of mouse testis cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000 97:8346-8351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992 340:17-18[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Ogura A, Ikegawa M, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Tashiro K, Toyokuni S, Honjo T, Shinohara T. Adenovirus-mediated gene delivery and in vitro microinsemination produce offspring from infertile male mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002 99:1383-1388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ikawa M, Tergaonkar V, Ogura A, Ogonuki N, Inoue K, Verma IM. Restoration of spermatogenesis by lentiviral gene transfer: Offspring from infertile mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002 99:7524-7529[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Transplantation of male germ line stem cells restores fertility in infertile mice. Nat Med 2000 6:29-34[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
N. Geijsen and D. L. Jones
Seminal discoveries in regenerative medicine: contributions of the male germ line to understanding pluripotency
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2008; 17(R1): R16 - R22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
K. E. Orwig, B.-Y. Ryu, S. R. Master, B. T. Phillips, M. Mack, M. R. Avarbock, L. Chodosh, and R. L. Brinster
Genes Involved in Post-Transcriptional Regulation Are Overrepresented in Stem/Progenitor Spermatogonia of Cryptorchid Mouse Testes
Stem Cells, April 1, 2008; 26(4): 927 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
Y. Lue, K. Erkkila, P. Y. Liu, K. Ma, C. Wang, A. S. Hikim, and R. S. Swerdloff
Fate of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Transplanted into the Testis: Potential Implication for Men with Testicular Failure
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2007; 170(3): 899 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. Ehmcke and S. Schlatt
A revised model for spermatogonial expansion in man: lessons from non-human primates.
Reproduction, November 1, 2006; 132(5): 673 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, H. Miki, K. Inoue, N. Ogonuki, S. Toyokuni, A. Ogura, and T. Shinohara
Germline niche transplantation restores fertility in infertile mice
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2376 - 2382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
Y.-M. Kuo, J. L. Duncan, S. K. Westaway, H. Yang, G. Nune, E. Y. Xu, S. J. Hayflick, and J. Gitschier
Deficiency of pantothenate kinase 2 (Pank2) in mice leads to retinal degeneration and azoospermia
Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 49 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. M. Oatley, J. J. Reeves, and D. J. McLean
Biological Activity of Cryopreserved Bovine Spermatogonial Stem Cells During In Vitro Culture
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2004; 71(3): 942 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Ohta, T. Wakayama, and Y. Nishimune
Commitment of Fetal Male Germ Cells to Spermatogonial Stem Cells During Mouse Embryonic Development
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1286 - 1291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. M. Oatley, D. M. de Avila, J. J. Reeves, and D. J. McLean
Testis Tissue Explant Culture Supports Survival and Proliferation of Bovine Spermatogonial Stem Cells
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2004; 70(3): 625 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Joerg, F. Janett, S. Schlatt, S. Mueller, D. Graphodatskaya, D. Suwattana, M. Asai, and G. Stranzinger
Germ Cell Transplantation in an Azoospermic Klinefelter Bull
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2003; 69(6): 1940 - 1944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/3/1064    most recent
biolreprod.102.009977v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shinohara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Brinster, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shinohara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Brinster, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shinohara, T.
Right arrow