Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 23, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.009738
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/3/888    most recent
biolreprod.102.009738v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lei, Z.M.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lei, Z.M.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lei, Z.M.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch. V.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 888–895 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.009738
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Male Reproductive Tract

Epididymal Phenotype in Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Knockout Animals and Its Response to Testosterone Replacement Therapy1

Z.M. Lei2,a, W. Zoua, S. Mishraa, X. Lia, and Ch. V. Raoa

a Division of Research, Department of Ob, Gyn, and Women's Health, University of Louisville Health Sciences Center, Louisville, Kentucky 40292


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Previous studies reported that epididymis contains functional LH receptors. The LH receptor knockout mice, which have epididymal phenotypes, gave us an opportunity to test the hypothesis that testosterone replacement alone may not be sufficient to reverse phenotypes to wild-type epididymis. The morphological phenotype in knockout animals includes a decrease in luminal diameter of the proximal and distal caput and cauda epididymis, the absence of clear and halo cells in the epithelial lining, a decrease in the height of principal cells and the number of cells containing cilia, a decrease in cilia length, and a change from basal to central location of nuclei in the principal cells. The biochemical phenotype includes a decrease in periodic acid-Schiff reaction product, reflecting the glycogen and glycoprotein synthesis and secretion, a decrease in androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor (ER)ß, and an increase in ER{alpha} levels. Twenty-one-day testosterone replacement therapy in 30-day-old knockout animals reversed some, but not all, morphological and biochemical phenotypes. Those that did not reverse include luminal diameters of proximal and distal caput and cauda epididymis, the percentage of ciliated principal cells in caput epididymis, and nuclear AR localization. In summary, while our results reaffirm that androgens are important for normal epididymal morphology and function, they indicate that LH could be required for certain facets of epididymal morphology and/or function.

androgen receptor, epididymis, estrogen receptor, gene regulation, luteinizing hormone


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The epididymis is a single, long, convoluted duct that connects testes with the vas deferens [1, 2]. It can be morphologically and functionally divided into initial, caput, corpus, and cauda regions. Each region has proximal and distal parts, which are most obvious in caput and cauda epididymis [14]. Epididymis has two major components, epithelial cell lining and lumen. The epithelial cell lining consists of principal, basal, halo, and clear cells, with principal cells outnumbering the others by more than 3:1 [1, 2]. Each cell type performs different functions, which are reflected by luminal fluid that contains ions, small organic molecules, glycogen, proteins, and glycoproteins [1, 2]. As sperm traverse from testes to vas deferens, some of the testicular secretions that accompany sperm are reabsorbed and sperm undergo maturational changes that enable them to fertilize oocytes [1, 2, 5, 6]. Mature sperm are stored in distal cauda epididymis [1, 2]. Although androgens are very important [1, 2, 7], other regulatory molecules are also involved in controlling epididymal functions [1, 2, 824].

LH, a glycoprotein hormone and a member of the cystine knot growth factor family [25, 26], binds to the same receptor as its structural and functional homolog, hCG [27, 28]. Studies have demonstrated the presence of these receptors not only in testis but also in epididymis and other accessory sex organs [1821, 2936]. Functional studies have demonstrated that LH can regulate epididymal functions that are important for sperm maturation [16, 21].

LH-receptor knockout mice have recently been made by homologous DNA recombination [37, 38]. The knockout males have markedly decreased serum testosterone levels, markedly elevated LH levels, and moderately increased estradiol and FSH levels [37, 38]. The phenotype of these animals includes micropenis, small abdominal testes, spermatogenic arrest at the round spermatid's stage, the absence of adult-type Leydig cells, the presence of a few fetal-type Leydig cells in adult testes, an increase in Sertoli cell number, and a rudimentary epididymis and other accessory sex organs. These animals presented us with an opportunity to test the hypothesis that testosterone replacement therapy alone may not fully restore epididymal phenotype, which implies that direct LH actions could be required.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
LH-Receptor Knockout Mice

Mice were maintained and all the procedures were performed as described in the NIH guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Adult male and female heterozygous mice were mated to obtain wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (±), and homozygous (-/-) animals. The zygosity was determined by Southern blotting with genomic tail DNA digested with Stu I and hybridized to [32P]-labeled DNA probe for the LH-receptor gene as previously described [37]. The probe was designed to detect an 8-kilobase (kb) DNA fragment of the 5'-flanking region of a wild-type LH-receptor gene and 10-kb mutant fragments that include the neomycin gene used in the disruption strategy. Thus, a single Southern blot performed on each sample allowed unambiguous identification of all three genotypes. All animals were maintained on a 12L:12D cycle with regular, unrestricted diet. For each experiment, three to six 7–8-week-old mice of each genotype were used.

Histology and Computerized Quantitative Morphometry

Caput and cauda epididymis were chosen for morphological analysis because they represent two extreme ends of the organ with distinct morphology and function. The tissues were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer-thick sections were cut and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin or periodic acid-Schiff reagent (PAS). The tissue sections were examined under bright-field microscopy for subsequent quantitative morphometry and photography.

Morphological changes were determined by a computerized Bioquant IV System (R & M Biometrics, Nashville, TN). The diameters of the ductal lumen were measured in several cross-sections covering a total area of 10 000 µm2. Principal epithelial cell heights were measured from the basement to the apical membrane in cross-sections of 10 tubules. The number of nonciliated and ciliated cells was counted in several cross-sections covering a total area of 10 000 µm2. The cilia lengths were determined by linear measurements from the apical membrane to the cilia tip in 10 tubule cross-sections.

Semiquantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total RNA was isolated from epididymis using a single-step acid guanidine thiocyanate-chloroform extraction method [37]. Two micrograms of total RNA were reverse transcribed into cDNA with oligo dT primers and AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI). The cDNA was then coamplified with ß-actin primers, [32P]-dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol from New England Nuclear-Dupont Biotechnology Systems, Boston, MA), dNTP mix (Promega), and one of the following primer sets (top strand is 5'-primer and bottom strand is 3'-primer). These are designed from published mouse sequences using a designer polymerase chain reaction (PCR) computer program (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) and synthesized by Operon Technologies (Alameda, CA).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

Optimal conditions and a PCR-cycle number for each primer set were predetermined to ensure that coamplification was within the linear range. PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels and bands were identified by autoradiography. The band intensities were quantified by a Z-gel scanning system (Zaxis, Hudson, OH) and expressed as ratios with ß-actin.

Western Blotting

This procedure was performed by homogenizing epididymides at 4°C in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin using a tissue tearor [39]. Then protein concentrations were determined and 20-µg aliquots were separated by discontinuous sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing conditions and transferred to Immobilon P membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA). After blocking nonspecific binding sites with 5% nonfat powdered milk, the membranes were incubated with 1:1000 dilutions of polyclonal antibodies to LH receptor (a gift from Dr. Patrick Roche, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN), AR, ER{alpha}, and ERß (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). The antibody bound receptors were detected by using a 1:1000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-labeled second antibody and enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). The molecular sizes of the proteins were determined by running standard molecular-weight marker proteins in an adjacent lane. The densities of bands were measured by the Z-gel scanning system and expressed as ratios with ß-actin.

Immunocytochemistry

This procedure was performed with an avidin-biotin immunoperoxidase kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) as previously described [40]. Briefly, deparaffinized epididymal sections were treated for 10 min with 0.75% H2O2 in methanol to block endogenous peroxidase. For antigen retrieval, the sections were boiled for 10 min in a microwave oven in a buffer containing 10 mM citric acid (pH 6.0). After washing, the sections were exposed to normal horse serum; a 1:500 dilution of LH receptor; proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA); progesterone receptor; AR, ER{alpha}, and ERß antibodies; and were incubated overnight at 4°C. Substitution of primary antibodies with nonspecific IgG served as procedural controls.

Testosterone Replacement Therapy

We chose 30-day-old animals for testosterone replacement therapy because this age corresponds to puberty, when circulating testosterone levels normally begin to raise. Twenty-one-day time-release pellets containing 5 mg testosterone were subcutaneously implanted (Innovative Research America, Sarasota, FL). Null mice for controls were implanted with placebo pellets. The animal's age at the end of therapy corresponds to the approximate age of sexual maturity.

Measurement of Testosterone Levels

The levels were measured by a Coat-A-Count total testosterone radioimmunoassay kit (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA). The kit instructions were followed in the measurement. Serum levels were measured without any extraction. Tissue levels were measured in supernatants obtained from centrifuging the testicular homogenates for 10 min at 10 000 x g. The inter- and intrassay coefficients of variation were less than 10% in the range of testosterone levels found in the samples. The cross-reactivity was less than 1% for most of the steroid hormones.

Statistical Analysis

The data presented are the means and their standard errors. Analysis of variance and Duncan multiple range tests were used for determining significant differences [41].


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Epididymal LH Receptors

The presence of LH receptors in wild-type epididymis and their absence in null epididymis were verified by Western blotting and immunocytochemistry. Testes from the same animals were used for comparison in Western blotting. Figure 1A shows that epididymis, like testis from wild-type animals, contained an 80-kDa receptor protein. This protein was not detected either in epididymis or in testis from null animals. Immunocytochemistry revealed the presence of LH-receptor immunostaining primarily in the principal cells of epididymal tubules of wild-type animals (Fig. 1B). Blood vessels in intertubular stroma were also receptor positive. The punctate staining reflects some principal cells staining more than others. Null epididymis showed no receptor immunostaining (Fig. 1C), as did the wild-type epididymis used in a procedural control (Fig. 1D).



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Western blotting (A) and immunohistochemistry (BD) for LH receptors in the testis and epididymides of wild-type (+/+) and LH-receptor knockout (-/-) mice. D) Immunostaining control with (+/+) epididymis in which receptor antibody was replaced with nonspecific IgG. Arrows in B indicate blood vessels. Bar = 10 µm.

Epididymal Morphology

The epididymal tubules were much smaller and lumens were completely devoid of spermatozoa in null animals as compared with wild-type and heterozygous littermates, which are indistinguishable (Fig. 2C versus Figure 2, A and B). Although it may not be apparent from low-magnification photographs, clear or halo cells, which represent minor cell populations in the epithelial cell lining, were not seen. Also, the number of principal cells decreased and they became cubic with centrally located nuclei. Only a few of the principal cells contained cilia, and their length decreased. These changes were quantified by computerized morphometry and are presented in Figure 3 and Table 1.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Epididymal morphology in three genotypes and after testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) of null (-/-) animals. Arrows in D indicate polynucleated cells mixed with spermatozoa. Bar = 10 µm



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Luminal diameter (left panels) and epithelial cell height (right panels) in proximal and distal caput (upper left and upper right) and proximal and distal cauda (lower left and lower right) epididymis of all three genotypes and after TRT of null animals. a, b) -/- versus +/+ and +/-; P < 0.001; (c, d) -/- TRT versus +/+ and +/-; P < 0.01.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. The number of ciliated cells and the height of the stereocilia in the epididymis

Figure 3 shows that luminal diameters of tubules and height of principal cells in proximal and distal caput (Fig. 3, upper panels) and cauda (Fig. 3, lower panels) epididymis dramatically decreased in homozygosity as compared with wild-type and heterozygous littermates. Table 1 shows that the percentage of ciliated epithelial cells and their cilia height decreased in homozygous animals.

PAS staining, reflecting the secretion of glycogen and glycoproteins, was very weak in the epithelial cells and in lumen of epididymal tubules of homozygous animals as compared with wild-type and heterozygous littermates (data not shown).

We previously reported that epididymides were barely recognizable in null animals, with a dramatic decrease in their weights [37]. This gross epididymal underdevelopment could either be due to an increase in apoptosis and/or a decrease in cell proliferation. The apoptosis, as tested by the TUNEL method, was found to be minimal in both wild-type and null animals (data not shown). In contrast, testicular apoptosis, especially in spermatocytes, dramatically increased in null as compared with wild-type testes [42].

Cell proliferation as determined by PCNA immunostaining showed a marked reduction in null epididymis as compared with wild-type and heterozygous littermates (data not shown). Quantitation revealed that, while less than 10% of principal cell nuclei were PCNA positive in null epididymis, approximately 98% of them were positive in wild-type and heterozygous littermates (data not shown).

Epididymal Steroid Hormone Receptor Levels

The epididymal steroid hormone receptor levels were determined by semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blotting. Semiquantitative RT-PCR revealed that, while progesterone receptor was undetectable (data not shown), AR, ER{alpha}, and ERß transcripts were present in epididymis of all three genotypes (Fig. 4A). While the AR and ERß levels decreased, ER{alpha} levels increased in null as compared with wild-type epididymis.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Semiquantitative RT-PCR (A) and Western blotting (B) for AR, ER{alpha}, and ERß in the epididymis of all three genotypes and after TRT of null animals. The relative mRNA and protein abundance was determined by densitometric scanning of the bands and expression as ratios with ß-actin. The ratios in wild-type animals were set at 1 for the calculation of changes in null littermates with or without TRT. The blots presented are representative and the fold changes (means and their standard errors) were calculated from three independent experiments

Western blot analysis revealed the presence of a 110-kDa AR protein, a 67-kDa ER{alpha} protein, and a 60-kDa ERß protein in epididymis of all three genotypes (Fig. 4B). All three receptor proteins changed in parallel with their cognate mRNAs.

Immunocytochemistry was used not only to determine cellular localization but also to independently verify AR, ER{alpha}, and ERß protein changes in null epididymis. It demonstrated that principal cell nuclei primarily contained AR (Fig. 5A), ER{alpha} (Fig. 5D), and ERß (Fig. 5G) immunostainings, and they changed in parallel with their mRNAs and proteins by Western blotting in null epididymis.



View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Immunostaining for AR (AC), ER{alpha} (DF), and ERß (GI) in the caput epididymis from wild-type and null animals with or without TRT. Procedural controls that had no immunostaining for any of the receptors were not shown, as recommended by the reviewer. Bar = 5 µm

Effect of Testosterone Replacement Therapy

If the epididymal changes in homozygous animals were completely due to a decrease in serum testosterone levels, then restoring them by replacement therapy should reverse the changes. This possibility was tested by placing 30-day-old homozygous animals on 21-day replacement therapy with 3-mm pellets representing a matrix-driven delivery system integrating the principles of diffusion, erosion, and concentration gradient resulting in a biodegradable matrix that effectively and continuously releases testosterone. The therapy resulted in similar intratesticular testosterone levels (1.3 ± 0.2 ng/µg protein), but serum levels were elevated by 6.6-fold (8 ± 0.1 ng/ml) as compared with wild-type littermates (1.2 ± 0.03 ng/ml). The control homozygous animals, placed on empty pellets, showed very low serum testosterone levels, as did untreated homozygous animals (~ 0.1 ng/ml).

The replacement therapy stimulated epididymal growth to a size comparable with that in wild-type littermates. This increased growth appears to be due to an increase in cell proliferation as reflected by PCNA staining (data not shown). The principal cells became columnar, with nuclei returned to the basal part of the cells (Fig. 2D). The number of ciliated cells and cilia lengths were restored (Table 1). The clear and halo cells seem to have been recovered, but their numbers have not been quantified because they represent only minor cell populations in the epithelial lining. The lumen contained polynucleated epithelial cells mixed with spermatozoa (Fig. 2D). As determined by PAS staining, the secretory activity of epididymis appears to have been restored (data not shown). The AR, ER{alpha}, and ERß changes were reversed, as determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR, Western blot, and immunocytochemical analyses (Figs. 4 and 5). The therapy, however, failed to completely restore the luminal diameters in proximal and distal caput and cauda epididymis (Fig. 3, lower left panel) and principal cell heights in caput epididymis (Fig. 3, upper right panel). In addition, AR immunostaining remained diffuse cytoplasmic rather than nuclear, as in the case of wild-type littermates (Fig. 5C versus Fig. 5A).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Epididymis is an important organ that sperm need to become competent in fertilizing oocytes [1, 2]. It is well known to be dependent on testosterone secretion by Leydig cells in response to LH stimulation [1, 2, 7]. Testosterone is then converted into a more potent androgen, dihydrotestosterone, by 5{alpha}-reductase present in the epididymal tissue [1, 2]. The actions of dihydrotestosterone are mediated by AR, which are abundant in epididymal tissue [1, 2]. Although androgens are very important [1, 2, 7], other molecules can also regulate epididymal functions [1, 2, 824]. The evidence for potential LH regulation of epididymal functions comes from the following data. Epididymis contains LH-receptor transcripts and/or receptor protein [18, 19, 21], hCG treatment stimulates epididymal growth in infant monkeys [43], increases in chloride ion effluxes, and the activity of tissue-type and urokinase-type plasminogen activators, both of which are associated with sperm maturation [16, 21]. These findings have led us to test whether the epididymal phenotype in LH-receptor knockout animals could be completely reversed by testosterone replacement therapy. If it did, androgen deficiency alone would be entirely responsible; otherwise, lack of LH action could also be responsible for epididymal phenotype.

The results with testosterone replacement therapy demonstrate that much of the wild-type morphologic and biochemical epididymal phenotype was restored, except for luminal diameters in proximal and distal caput and cauda epididymis, height of principal cells in cauda epididymis, and nuclear AR localization. It is possible that luminal diameter is determined by the presence of sperm and fluid, both of which may not have completely recovered after testosterone replacement therapy. We do not know whether varying the testosterone dose or length of replacement would restore these other features to wild-type epididymis. This is probably unlikely considering that the present replacement regimen reversed most of the epididymal changes. Nevertheless, variations in the testosterone replacement therapy, including starting the therapy shortly after birth and intraepididymal lumen delivery of testosterone, which is technically demanding considering the small size of null epididymis, need to be tested. In the meantime, however, because LH has a direct role in epididymal functions, the lack of reversal of a subset of epididymal features suggests that LH actions could be required.

It is well known that not only androgens but also estrogens can regulate epididymal functions through their cognate receptors [13]. Thus, it would be of interest to determine the effect of LH-receptor knockout on epididymal AR, ER{alpha}, and ERß levels. Our studies revealed differential effects on epididymal and testicular steroid hormone-receptor levels. For example, while epididymal AR decreased, testicular AR levels were unaffected [37]. While ER{alpha} increased and ERß decreased in epididymis, ER{alpha} decreased and ERß increased in testes [37]. Testosterone replacement therapy reversed ER{alpha} and ERß changes in epididymis but not in testes [44]. These differences suggest that androgens mediate the LH actions in regulating epididymal but not testicular ER{alpha} and ERß levels. Thus, androgens up-regulate ERß along with AR and down-regulate ER{alpha} in epididymis, and in their absence, ERß and AR decrease and ER{alpha} increases. It is of interest to the note that, while testosterone replacement therapy reversed AR, it remained cytoplasmic rather than nuclear. This may indicate that direct LH actions may be required for nuclear import of AR.

Whether AR, ER{alpha}, and ERß changes were related to the lack of epididymal growth in knockout animals is not known. However, their reversal, concomitant with growth stimulation after testosterone replacement therapy, suggests that they may somehow be related. ER{alpha} may also participate in fluid reabsorption in caput epididymis because its disruption results in its impairment and infertility [45]. The role of ERß in epididymal functions is unknown. However, its presence and reciprocal changes from ER{alpha} in LH-receptor knockout animals suggest that both ERs may have distinct roles in the regulation of epididymal functions.

As previously described, sperm appeared in epididymal lumen, due to resumption of spermatogenesis in testes, after testosterone replacement therapy [44]. However, their concentrations appeared to be lower than in wild-type animals, which could in part be due to impaired fluid reabsorption mechanisms. Nevertheless, sperm in cauda epididymis have normal morphology and are able to fertilize wild-type oocytes in vitro at a lower rate than wild-type sperm [44]. This lower rate may also reflect a lack of adequate sperm maturation.

In summary, our results document in detail the epididymal phenotype in LH-receptor knockout animals. This phenotype was mostly, but not entirely, due to a decrease in testosterone levels, and direct LH actions could be required for a subset of epididymal features.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Dr. Bingrui Xu and Mr. Mark Foltz.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This work was supported by NIH grant R03 HD-40223. Back

2 Correspondence: Z.M. Lei or Ch.V. Rao, Department of Ob, Gyn, and Women's Health, 438 MDR Building, University of Louisville, Health Sciences Center, Louisville, KY 40292. FAX: 502 852 0881; e-mail: zhenmin.lei{at}louisville.edu or e-mail: cvrao001{at}louisville.edu Back

Received: 25 July 2002.

First decision: 20 August 2002.

Accepted: 19 September 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Robaire B, Hermo L. Efferent ducts, epididymis, and vas deferens: structure, functions, and their regulation. In: Knobil E, Neill J (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1988: 999–1079
  2. Hamilton DW. Anatomy of mammalian male accessory reproductive organs. In: Lamming GE (ed.), Marshall's Physiology of Reproduction, vol. 2, Reproduction in the Male. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1990: 691–746
  3. Kirchhoff C. Gene expression in the epididymis. Int Rev Cytol 1999 188:133-202[Medline]
  4. Jervis KM, Robaire B. Dynamic changes in gene expression along the rat epididymis. Biol Reprod 2001 65:696-703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Orgebin-Crist MC. Sperm maturation in rabbit epididymis. Nature 1967 216:816-818[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Bedford JM. Sperm dynamics in the epididymis. In: Asch AH, Bamaceda JP, Johnson I (eds.), Gamete Physiology. Norwell, MA: Serono Symposia; 1992: 53–67
  7. Orgebin-Crist MC. Androgens and epididymal function. In: Bhasin S, (ed.), Pharmacology, Biology and Clinical Applications of Androgens. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1996: 27–38
  8. Meistrich ML, Hughes TJ, Bruce WR. Alteration of epididymal sperm transport and maturation in mice by oestrogen and testosterone. Nature 1975 258:145-147[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Orgebin-Crist MC, Djiane J. Properties of a prolactin receptor from the rabbit epididymis. Biol Reprod 1979 21:135-139[Abstract]
  10. Walters MR, Hunziker W, Norman AW. 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptors: exchange assay and presence in reproductive tissues. In: Norman AW, Schaefer K, Herrath DV, Grigoleit HG (eds.), Vitamin D, Chemical, Biochemical and Clinical Endocrinology of Calcium Metabolism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter; 1982: 91–93
  11. Wong PYD, Lee WM. Effects of spironolactone (aldosterone antagonist) on electrolytes and water content of the cauda epididymidis and fertility of male rats. Biol Reprod 1982 27:771-777[Abstract]
  12. Orgebin-Crist MC, Eller BC, Danzo BJ. The effects of estradiol, tamoxifen, and testosterone on the weights and histology of the epididymis and accessory sex organs of sexually immature rabbits. Endocrinology 1983 113:1703-1715[Abstract]
  13. Porter SB, Ong DE, Chytil F, Orgebin-Crist MC. Localization of cellular retinol-binding protein and cellular retinoic acid-binding protein in the rat testis and epididymis. J Androl 1985 6:197-212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Wong PYD, Fu WO, Huang SJ. Endothelin stimulates short circuit current in cultured rat epididymal epithelium. Brit J Pharmacol 1989 98:1191-1196[Medline]
  15. Wong PYD, Fu WO, Huang SJ, Law WK. Effect of angiotensins on electrogenic anion transport in monolayer cultures of rat epididymis. J Endocrinol 1990 125:449-456[Medline]
  16. Panesar NS, Huang SJ. Effect of hCG on intracellular chloride concentration in rat epididymal cells. Clin Biochem Rev 1993 14:(abstract PS255)
  17. Lai KB, Fu WO, Ko WH, Chan HC, Wong PYD. The effect of [Arg8]-vasopressin on electrogenic chloride secretion in cultured rat epididymal epithelia. Am J Physiol 1994 267:C607-C616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Tao YX, Lei ZM, Rao ChV. Novel expression of luteinizing hormone (LH)/human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) receptor gene in rat epididymis. Biol Reprod 1995 52:suppl 1abstract 338 (141)
  19. Zhou HM, Zhang T, Liu YX. Rat epididymis expresses luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR). Chinese Sci Bull 1996 41:1608-1610
  20. Tao YX, Lei ZM, Rao ChV. Human epididymis contains luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptors. In: Program of the 10th International Congress of Endocrinology; 1996; San Francisco, CA. Abstract OR21-2
  21. Zhang T, Liu YX. Localization of plasminogen activator and inhibitor, LH and androgen receptors and inhibin subunits in monkey epididymis. Mol Hum Reprod 1997 3:945-952[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Leung PS, Chan HC, Fu LXM, Zhou WL, Wong PYD. Angiotensin II receptors, AT1 and AT2, in the rat epididymis: immunocytochemical and electrophysiological studies. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997 1357:65-72[Medline]
  23. Zhou WL, Leung PS, Wong TP, Dun NJ, Wong PYD, Chan HC. Local regulation of epididymal anion secretion by pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide. J Endocrinol 1997 154:389-395[Abstract]
  24. Leung PS, Chan HC, Chung YW, Wong TP, Wong PYD. The role of local angiotensins and prostaglandins in the control of anion secretion by the rat epididymis. J Reprod Fertil 1998 53:15-22
  25. Pierce JG, Parsons TF. Glycoprotein hormones: structure and function. Annu Rev Biochem 1981 50:466-495
  26. Lapthorn AJ, Harris DC, Littlejohn A, Lustbader JW, Canfield RE, Machin KJ, Morgan FJ, Isaacs NW. Crystal structure of human chorionic gonadotropin. Nature 1994 369:455-461[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Rao ChV. Differential properties of human chorionic gonadotropin and human luteinizing hormone binding to plasma membranes of bovine corpora lutea. Acta Endocrinol 1979 90:696-710
  28. Jia X-C, Oikawa M, Tanaka T, Ny T, Boime I, Hsueh AJ. Expression of human luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor: interaction with LH and chorionic gonadotropin from human but not equine, rat and ovine species. Mol Endocrinol 1991 5:759-768[Abstract]
  29. Tao YX, Lei ZM, Woodworth SH, Rao ChV. Novel expression of luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor gene in rat prostate. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1995 111:R9-R12[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Reiter E, McNamara M, Closset J, Hennen G. Expression and functionality of luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor in the rat prostate. Endocrinology 1995 136:917-923[Abstract]
  31. Tao YX, Bao S, Ackermann DM, Lei ZM, Rao ChV. Expression of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptor gene in benign prostatic hyperplasia and in prostate carcinoma in humans. Biol Reprod 1997 56:67-72[Abstract]
  32. Reiter E, Poncin J, Hennuy B, Bruyninx M, Klug M, Cornet A, Closset J, Hennen G. Luteinizing hormone increases the abundance of various transcripts, independently of the androgens in the rat prostate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997 233:108-112[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Bao S, Lei ZM, Rao ChV. The presence of functional luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptors in human prostate cell lines. In: Program of the 79th annual meeting of the Endocrine Society; 1997; Minneapolis, MN. Abstract P3-403
  34. Tao YX, Lei ZM, Rao ChV. Seminal vesicles are novel sites of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptor gene expression. J Androl 1998 19:343-347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Dirnhofer S, Berger C, Hermann M, Steiner G, Madersbacher S, Berger P. Coexpression of gonadotropic hormones and their corresponding FSH and LH/CG-receptors in the human prostate. Prostate 1998 35:212-220[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Lei ZM, Rao ChV. Direct luteinizing hormone regulation of the male reproductive tract. In: Countinho AM, Spinola P (eds.), Current Knowledge in Reproductive Medicine. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V. 2000: 3–9
  37. Lei ZM, Mishra S, Zou W, Xu B, Foltz M, Li X, Rao ChV. Targeted disruption of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptor gene. Mol Endocrinol 2001 15:184-200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Zhang FP, Poutanen M, Wilbertz J, Huhtaniemi I. Normal prenatal but arrested postnatal sexual development of luteinizing hormone receptor knockout (LuRKO) mice. Mol Endocrinol 2001 15:172-183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Lei ZM, Rao ChV. Signaling and transacting factors in the transcriptional inhibition of gonadotropin releasing hormone gene by human chorionic gonadotropin in immortalized hypothalamic GT1–7 neurons. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1995 109:151-157[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Lei ZM, Rao ChV. Novel presence of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) receptors and the down-regulating action of hCG on gonadotropin releasing hormone gene expression in immortalized hypothalamic GT1–7 neurons. Mol Endocrinol 1994 8:1111-1121[Abstract]
  41. Steele RGD. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, with Special Reference to the Biological Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1960
  42. Mishra S, Lei ZM, Rao ChV. Gonadal failure in LH/hCG receptor knockout mice: increased apoptosis and decreased telomerase levels. Biol Reprod 2000 62:suppl 1abstract 236 (200)
  43. Schlatt S, Arslan M. Endocrine control of testicular somatic and premeiotic germ cell development in the immature testis of the primate Macaca mulatta. Eur J Endocrinol 1995 133:235-247[Abstract]
  44. Rao CV, Lei ZM. Consequences of targeted inactivation of LH receptors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2002 187:57-67[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Hess RA, Bunick D, Lee KH, Bahr J, Taylor JA, Korach KS, Lubahn DB. A role for oestrogens in the male reproductive system. Nature 1997 390:509-512[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
L. DONG, S. A. JELINSKY, J. N. FINGER, D. S. JOHNSTON, G. S. KOPF, C. M. SOTTAS, M. P. HARDY, and R.-S. GE
Gene Expression During Development of Fetal and Adult Leydig Cells
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2007; 1120(1): 16 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. L. Dahia and A. J. Rao
Demonstration of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor in Cauda Epididymis of Rat
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2006; 75(1): 98 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Filippi, A. Morelli, L. Vignozzi, G. B. Vannelli, M. Marini, P. Ferruzzi, R. Mancina, C. Crescioli, N. Mondaini, G. Forti, et al.
Oxytocin Mediates the Estrogen-Dependent Contractile Activity of Endothelin-1 in Human and Rabbit Epididymis
Endocrinology, August 1, 2005; 146(8): 3506 - 3517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. Pakarainen, F.-P. Zhang, S. Makela, M. Poutanen, and I. Huhtaniemi
Testosterone Replacement Therapy Induces Spermatogenesis and Partially Restores Fertility in Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Knockout Mice
Endocrinology, February 1, 2005; 146(2): 596 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Z.M. Lei, S. Mishra, P. Ponnuru, X. Li, Z.W. Yang, and Ch.V. Rao
Testicular Phenotype in Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Knockout Animals and the Effect of Testosterone Replacement Therapy
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2004; 71(5): 1605 - 1613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/3/888    most recent
biolreprod.102.009738v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lei, Z.M.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lei, Z.M.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lei, Z.M.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS