Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 31, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.010090
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/4/1165    most recent
biolreprod.102.010090v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Winston, R. M.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Winston, R. M.L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Winston, R. M.L.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 1165–1169 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.010090
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Embryo

Maintenance of the Inner Cell Mass in Human Blastocysts from Fragmented Embryos

Kate Hardy1,a,c, Jaroslav Starkb, and Robert M.L. Winstona

a Department of Reproductive Science and Medicine, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, The Wolfson and Weston Research Centre for Family Health, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 ONN, United Kingdom b Department of Mathematics, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom c CoMPLEX (Centre for Mathematics and Physics in the Life Sciences and Experimental Biology), University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The degree of fragmentation during early cleavage is universally used as an indicator of embryo quality during human in vitro fertilization treatment. Extensive fragmentation has been associated with reduced blastocyst formation and implantation. We examined the relationship between early fragmentation and subsequent allocation of cells to the trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the human blastocyst. We retrospectively analyzed data from 363 monospermic human embryos that exhibited varying degrees of fragmentation on Day 2. Embryos were cultured from Day 2 to Day 6 in Earle balanced salt solution with 1 mM glucose and human serum albumin. Rates of development and blastocyst formation were measured. The number of cells in the trophectoderm and inner cell mass and the incidence of apoptosis were assessed following differential labeling with polynucleotide-specific fluorochromes. Increasing fragmentation resulted in reduced blastocyst formation and lower blastocyst cell numbers. For minimal and moderate levels of fragmentation, the reduction in cell numbers was confined largely to the trophectoderm and a steady number of inner cell mass cells was maintained. However, with extensive fragmentation of more than 25%, cell numbers in both lineages were reduced in the few embryos that formed blastocysts. Apoptotic nuclei were present in both the trophectoderm and inner cell mass, with the lowest incidence in blastocysts that had developed from embryos with minor (5–10%) fragmentation. Paradoxically, higher levels of apoptosis were seen in embryos of excellent morphology, suggesting a possible role in regulation of cell number.

apoptosis, early development, embryo, in vitro fertilization


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cytoplasmic fragments are common in human embryos fertilized in vivo [13] and in vitro [46]. Their extent varies widely, ranging from a few small fragments to extensive fragmentation involving loss of one or more blastomeres. The degree of fragmentation and the developmental stage are the most commonly used methods for selecting embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilization (IVF). Extensive fragmentation is associated with reduced blastocyst formation [7, 8] and implantation [4, 911], although embryos with no fragments can still arrest.

Little is known about the effects of fragmentation on blastocyst cell number, apoptosis, or the allocation of cells to the inner cell mass (ICM), from which the fetus is derived, and the trophectoderm (TE). The increasing use of blastocyst culture in clinical IVF and selection of blastocysts for transfer has stimulated this retrospective analysis of data that we collected over the past decade on blastocyst formation, cell number, and cell death. Focusing on embryo development in a single culture medium, we examined the impact of fragmentation during early cleavage on subsequent blastocyst formation and cell number. We also assessed the number of cells allocated to the ICM and the TE and the incidence of apoptosis in these two lineages.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To investigate the effects of fragmentation, we focused on a subset of 363 embryos from a database containing information on >1000 embryos. Because type of culture medium will affect blastocyst formation and cell number, this subset represents the largest sample of embryos that had been cultured in a single medium under identical conditions, i.e., Earle balanced salt solution (EBSS) containing 1 mM glucose and supplemented with human serum albumin (HSA). To reduce confounding variables, the same medium was used to culture embryos undergoing both early cleavage and blastocyst formation. Data were collected on rate of development, blastocyst formation and cell number, the number of cells allocated to the ICM and the TE, and the extent of cell death in each of these lineages.

Human Oocytes and Embryos

Embryos were donated, with informed consent, by infertile couples undergoing IVF who did not wish to cryopreserve untransferred embryos for future replacement. The work was licensed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, and local permission was granted by the ethics committee of the Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London.

Superovulation in women undergoing IVF treatment was induced with human menopausal gonadotropin (Pergonal; Serono, Feltham, Middlesex, U.K.) after pituitary-gonadal suppression by an LH-releasing hormone agonist (Buserelin; Hoescht, Hounslow, U.K.) [12]. Ten thousand international units of hCG (Profasi; Serono) was administered 36 h before oocyte retrieval. Oocyte-cumulus complexes were preincubated, inseminated, and observed the following day for the presence of pronuclei [13]. Between the time when embryos were checked for pronuclei, until the time of embryo transfer, embryos were cultured singly in 1 ml of EBSS (Gibco BRL, Paisley, U.K.) containing 5.56 mM glucose, 25 mM sodium bicarbonate (BDH, Lutterworth, Leics, U.K.), 0.47 mM pyruvate (Sigma, Poole, Dorset, U.K.), 37.5 U/ml of streptomycin (Sigma), and 97.5 U/ml penicillin (Sigma) and supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated maternal serum under a gas phase of 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 at 37°C.

Classification and Grading of Embryos

On the morning of Day 1, approximately 16–18 h postinsemination (Day 0 = day of oocyte retrieval and insemination), oocytes were classified according to the number of visible pronuclei. On the morning of Day 2, embryos were graded on the basis of blastomere symmetry and degree of fragmentation (Fig. 1). Grade A embryos had symmetrical or very slightly asymmetrical blastomeres with either no fragmentation or occasional small fragments (<5%); grade B embryos had all the blastomeres intact but some cytoplasmic fragmentation (5–10%) and/or unevenly sized cells; grade C embryos had asymmetry and more extensive fragmentation (10–25%) although all the blastomeres remained intact; and grade D embryos had one or more fragmented blastomeres (>25% fragmentation). The number of blastomeres was also assessed.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Definition of human embryo grade based on degree of fragmentation

One to three of the most rapidly developing embryos with the closest to perfect morphology were selected for transfer [14]. Untransferred embryos were cryopreserved or donated, with informed consent, for research. All embryos included in this analysis had two pronuclei on Day 1, with no evidence of polyspermic fertilization.

Culture of Embryos

From Day 2 on, after embryo transfer surplus embryos were individually cultured in 5-µl drops of custom-made EBSS with 1 mM glucose and supplemented with 2.5% HSA in filter-sterilized silicone fluid (Dow Corning 200/50 cs; BDH) under a gas phase of 5% CO2 in air. Embryos were moved to fresh drops daily. Embryos were scored between 1200 and 1700 h on Day 2.

Counting of Blastocyst Nuclei

On the morning of Day 6, blastocysts were scored for the degree of blastocoele expansion. The cavities in early blastocysts and blastocysts were less than half and greater than half the diameter of the embryo, respectively. When the diameter of the blastocysts had markedly increased (~20%), with zona thinning, the embryo was classified as an expanded blastocyst. Cell counts for the TE and ICM of the blastocysts were obtained by differential labeling of the nuclei with polynucleotide-specific fluorochromes [15]. The TE nuclei were labelled with propidium iodide during immunosurgical lysis, before fixing the embryo and labeling both sets of nuclei with bisbenzimide in absolute ethanol. Differentially labeled embryos were mounted in glycerol and partially disaggregated, and the nuclei were counted under fluorescence microscopy. When viewed through a combination ultraviolet excitation filter and fluorescein isothiocyanate emission filter, the TE and ICM nuclei appear orange and green, respectively [15]. Before disaggregation, embryos were inspected in whole mount to assure that the entire TE was uniformly labeled. In some embryos, only part of the TE was labeled with propidium iodide, probably because incomplete removal of the zona pellucida had impeded the immunosurgical lysis. For these embryos, only measurements of total cell number were considered accurate.

Apoptotic nuclei were easily identified and characterized by discrete clusters of labeled nuclear fragments. Apoptotic nuclei were not included in the total numbers of healthy nuclei in the TE and ICM. The dead cell index was computed:

Statistical Analysis

Blastocysts were grouped according to the morphological grade that they had been earlier in development, on Day 2 (grades A–D). Numbers of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage in all the groups were compared using chi-square analysis for multiple groups. When the difference was significant (P < 0.05), differences between individual pairs of groups were compared using chi-square analysis, and the P value was then corrected using the Bonferroni correction (multiplying the P value by the number of comparisons initially made, i.e., n(n - 1)/2, where n is the number of groups).

Numbers of healthy cells were normally distributed, but the populations in groups A–D had significantly different SDs (P < 0.01, using the method of Bartlett). In addition, the percentage of apoptotic cells was not normally distributed in the different groups. Therefore, differences in the distribution of the total cell number, the number of TE and ICM cells, and the percentage of apoptotic cells were compared first using the Kruskal-Wallis test (a nonparametric test for more than two groups). When the differences in distribution were significant for all the groups, individual comparisons between two groups of interest were made using a Dunn posthoc test.

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad InStat version 3.0a for Macintosh (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA; www.graphpad.com).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Blastocyst Formation

Overall, 200/363 (55%) of embryos reached the blastocyst stage by Day 5 or Day 6. The remaining embryos arrested at or after the four-cell stage.

Embryo grade on Day 2 affected the subsequent rate of development, significantly affecting compaction on Day 4 (P = 0.0001) and cavitation on Day 5 (P = 0.008). By Day 4, 47% of grade A, 36% of grade B, 37% of grade C, and only 9% of grade D embryos had reached the morula stage. On Day 5, 19% of grade A embryos but only 5% of grade D embryos cavitated.

Embryo grade on Day 2 was related significantly to blastocyst formation by Day 6 (P = 0.0001); only 12% of grade D embryos but >60% of grade A and grade B embryos gave rise to blastocysts (Fig. 2). Chi-square tests showed strong evidence for a trend in the proportion of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage in relation to increasing fragmentation on Day 2. Early cleavage rate has been reported as related to subsequent blastocyst formation [16, 17]. Even when only embryos with four or more cells on Day 2 were considered, there was a significant decrease (P = 0.0006) in blastocyst formation, from 62% for grade A embryos to 16% for grade D embryos.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Percentage of human embryos with increasing fragmentation on Day 2 that reach the blastocyst stage by Day 6. D is significantly lower than A (P = 0.0006), B (P = 0.0006), and C (P = 0.001) ({chi}2 test with Bonferroni correction)

A similar proportion of blastocysts from embryos of grades A–C were expanded (56–61%). No expanded blastocysts developed from grade D embryos.

Blastocyst Cell Number

Embryo grade on Day 2 was also significantly related (P = 0.003) to the number of cells in Day 6 blastocysts (Fig. 3A), with cell number declining from 68.9 ± 5.5 (mean ± SEM) in grade A embryos to 29.0 ± 3.6 in grade D embryos. This reduction in cell number was mainly due to a steady and parallel decline in the number of TE cells (P = 0.002) (Fig. 3B). When only embryos with four or more cells on Day 2 were considered, there was still a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the number of cells in Day 6 blastocysts from 74.7 ± 6.5 for grade A embryos to 31.5 ± 3.3 for grade D embryos, with a similar decline in the number of TE cells (data not shown). Although a similar proportion of blastocysts were expanded in grades A–C, the cell number in expanded blastocysts declined from 74.6 ± 6.3 (grade A) to 52.3 ± 4.6 (grade C) (nonsignificant difference).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Number of cells and percentage of apoptotic nuclei in blastocysts which have developed from human embryos with minimal or no fragmentation (<5%, grade A), minor fragmentation (5–10%, grade B), moderate fragmentation (10–25%, grade C), and extensive fragmentation involving loss of blastomeres (>25%, grade D). Values are means ± SEM. Bars with the same superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05, Dunn posthoc test). A) Total number of cells in blastocysts. B) Number of cells in the TE ({square}) and in ICM ({block}) in blastocysts. C) Percentage of apoptotic nuclei in blastocysts. Bars with the same superscript are significantly different (a, P < 0.01; b, P < 0.05). D) Percentage of apoptotic nuclei in the TE ({square}; P = 0.007) and ICM ({block}; P = 0.048) was significantly related to embryo grade on Day 2

The decline in the number of TE cells was significant even in blastocysts where all the blastomeres had been intact on Day 2 (grades A–C; P = 0.03). The number of ICM cells remained remarkably constant (P = 0.248).

Embryo grade on Day 2 was significantly related to apoptosis in Day 6 blastocysts (P = 0.0005) (Fig. 3C). The dead cell index significantly declined from 10% in blastocysts from grade A embryos to 3% (P < 0.01) in blastocysts from grade B embryos. For both grade A and grade B embryos, levels of apoptosis were similar in the TE and ICM (Fig. 3D). Level of apoptosis in blastocysts from grade C embryos was significantly higher than that for blastocysts from grade B embryos (Fig. 3C; P < 0.05), although apoptosis in the ICM remained low (Fig. 3D).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Increasing levels of fragmentation were associated with reduced blastocyst formation and lower blastocyst cell numbers, specifically in the TE. However, even when the number of TE cells had declined markedly, a steady number of ICM cells was maintained. This finding suggests that in the human blastocyst there is homeostatic regulation of the lineage that gives rise to the fetus. When there was extensive fragmentation (>25%), few embryos reached the blastocyst stage, and in the few that did, cell numbers in both lineages were reduced.

In both the present and a previous study [8], a small degree of fragmentation (up to 10–15%) did not affect blastocyst formation, but when fragmentation was >15%, the rate of blastocyst formation declined rapidly. There are several possible explanations for the potentially detrimental effects of fragments on development. Fragments may physically impede cell-cell interactions, interfering with compaction, cavitation, and blastocyst formation [4, 18]. Ultrastructural observations that blastomeres adjacent to fragments show signs of degeneration [19] have given rise to the idea that fragments release toxic substances that damage nearby cells [4]. Fragments may also reduce the volume of cytoplasm and deplete the embryos of essential organelles or polarized domains [4, 20].

During cleavage, there is no cell growth [21]. Thus, fragmentation could result in loss of whole blastomeres, loss of cytoplasm from individual blastomeres, or both. Previous studies have shown that removal of entire blastomeres (to a maximum of 25% of the embryo volume) from four- and eight-cell mouse and human embryos produces blastocysts with fewer cells. However, removal of cells has no effect on blastocyst formation [2224]. In contrast, in the present study severe fragmentation equivalent to loss of one or more blastomeres on Day 2 was associated with a dramatically reduced blastocyst formation rate, from 60% to 12%. This finding implies that the reduction in blastocyst formation is not simply due to the decrease in embryo volume resulting from fragmentation.

This first study of the effects of fragmentation on blastocyst cell number revealed that increasing fragmentation is associated with a decrease in cell number on Day 6. Even embryos with only minor fragmentation and no loss of blastomeres have reduced cell numbers on Day 6. Because there is no cell growth during cleavage, formation of anucleate cytoplasmic fragments will result in decreased cell volume. In the mouse, reducing cell volume by removing cytoplasm from fertilized oocytes leads to a reduced cell division rate and lower blastocyst cell numbers, and extreme reduction of cell volume (to the extent that the cell is simply a karyoplast) stops cell division altogether [2527]. This finding supports the hypothesis that increasing fragmentation (and hence reduced cell volume of intact blastomeres) in human embryos results in slower cell division and hence low cell numbers in the blastocyst. Thus, it appears that reducing the volume of the embryo by removing entire blastomeres decreases blastocyst cell number but does not affect blastocyst formation. However, reducing the volume of individual blastomeres by removing cytoplasm (either artificially by micromanipulation or naturally by fragmentation) decreases both blastocyst formation and cell number.

As overall cell numbers decrease, the two lineages show distinctly different behaviors. With declining cell numbers, the number of ICM cells is maintained at a remarkably steady level at the expense of TE cell number, which diminishes steadily with increasing fragmentation. ICM cell numbers only dropped in blastocysts that at earlier stages had gross (>25%) fragmentation. There seems to be homeostatic control of ICM cell numbers, and the mechanism for this control apparently remains intact up to moderate levels of fragmentation. The number of ICM cells could be controlled at the stage when cells are allocated to the ICM. In the mouse, allocation to the ICM takes place initially during the fourth cleavage division and is fine-tuned by a further contribution from the outer cells during the fifth division, maintaining ICM cell numbers within a fairly narrow range [28]. Alternatively, the number of ICM cells in the expanding blastocyst could be maintained by adjusting the balance between cell division and cell death, as has previously been suggested [29, 30]. Levels of cell death in the ICM are high in blastocysts from grade A embryos of perfect morphology (and high cell numbers) and are lower in embryos of poorer quality (grades B and C) with lower cell numbers (Fig. 3D), supporting a regulatory role for apoptosis in maintenance of cell number.

The hypothesis that fragmentation reflects inherent abnormalities of embryogenesis is supported by previous observations that extensive fragmentation is associated with aneuploidy, increased mosaicism, and polyploidy [3134]. These abnormalities may result in developmental arrest and reduced cell numbers in surviving blastocysts. However, it is also possible that chromosomal abnormalities do not cause fragmentation but rather that chromosomal abnormalities and fragmentation go hand in hand, both being a manifestation of cytoskeletal and spindle defects. Mosaicism is thought to arise after fertilization, during mitosis, as a result of either a lack of cell cycle checkpoints [35] or a defective mitotic apparatus. These defects could result in asymmetric and abnormal cell division, nondisjunction, anaphase lag, and formation of micronuclei [19], which would in turn give rise to aneuploid cells [33, 36, 37], cells with nuclear abnormalities (such as bi- and multinucleate cells) [38], and anucleate cells or fragments. The manifestation of fragmentation on Day 2, before global activation of the embryonic genome [39, 40], probably reflects a fundamental defect that originated in the gametes, most likely the oocyte [41]. The increased levels of apoptosis seen in grade C and grade D embryos (Fig. 3C) could be associated with removal of defective cells from the embryo, as proposed by Hardy [42]. Alternatively, fragments may be equivalent to apoptotic bodies [43]. However, we and others (unpublished observations) [18], using classic markers such as TUNEL labeling of fragmented DNA or annexin V labeling of externalized phosphatidylserine, have been unable to confirm that fragments are the end products of apoptosis.

There is evidence that the extent of fragmentation is modulated by the environment. Embryos cultured on a monolayer of feeder cells had fewer fragments than did embryos cultured alone [44]. Efforts to improve culture media, in particular the advent of sequential media designed to support the changing nutritional requirements of the embryo, prompt the question of whether a similar association between the degree of fragmentation and developmental potential, cell number, and apoptosis operates in embryos cultured in different media.

The high level of apoptosis seen in embryos of perfect morphology is intriguing. In addition to removal of defective cells, apoptosis could be playing a homeostatic role, regulating cell number and preventing overgrowth, particularly of the ICM. An oversize ICM could have problems maintaining healthy central cells because of the increased distance over which oxygen and nutrients would have to diffuse. In addition, a disproportionately large ICM could result in an oversize fetus and large-offspring syndrome, as has previously been proposed [45]. As yet, the role of apoptosis is preimplantation development is unknown. Although the human embryo can tolerate and may even require moderate levels of apoptosis for healthy development, excessive cell death will most probably result in implantation failure or embryonic loss soon after implantation.

Fragmentation has a detrimental effect on blastocyst formation and cell number. Regardless of whether the reduced cell number is due to reduced blastomere volume following fragment formation or is a reflection of an inherent defect in the embryo (such as aneuploidy), a constant number of ICM cells is maintained. Only in excessively fragmented embryos is cell number reduced in both lineages. These results suggest that a small degree of fragmentation (up to 10–15%) is not necessarily indicative of major defects in the embryo or of a reduced capacity to form a blastocyst. Rather, limited fragmentation may merely lead to a slower rate of cell division, probably because of a loss of cytoplasmic volume. However, excessive fragmentation (>25%) is associated with very poor blastocyst development, probably reflecting inherent defects in the embryo.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Karin Dawson and Suzy Duffy for helpful discussion and critical reading of the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Correspondence: Kate Hardy, Department of Reproductive Science and Medicine, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 ONN, U.K. FAX: 44 020 7594 2111; k.hardy{at}ic.ac.uk Back

Received: 7 August 2002.

First decision: 23 August 2002.

Accepted: 11 October 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hertig AT, Rock J, Adams EC, Mulligan WJ. On the preimplantation stages of the human ovum: a description of four normal and four abnormal specimens ranging from the second to fifth day of development. Contrib Embryol 1954 35:199-220
  2. Pereda J, Croxatto HB. Ultrastructure of a seven-cell human embryo. Biol Reprod 1978 18:481-489[Abstract]
  3. Pereda J, Cheviakoff S, Croxatto HB. Ultrastructure of a 4-cell human embryo developed in vivo. Hum Reprod 1989 4:680-688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Alikani M, Cohen J, Tomkin G, Garrisi GJ, Mack C, Scott RT. Human embryo fragmentation in vitro and its implications for pregnancy and implantation. Fertil Steril 1999 71:836-842[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Sundstrom P, Nilsson O, Liedholm P. Cleavage rate and morphology of early human embryos obtained after artificial fertilization and culture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1981 60:109-120[Medline]
  6. Trounson A, Sathananthan AH. The application of electron microscopy in the evaluation of two- to four-cell human embryos cultured in vitro for embryo transfer. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transf 1984 1:153-165[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Rijnders PM, Jansen CA. The predictive value of Day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after Day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998 13:2869-2873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Alikani M, Calderon G, Tomkin G, Garrisi J, Kokot M, Cohen J. Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro. Hum Reprod 2000 15:2634-2643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Giorgetti C, Terriou P, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach JL, Salzmann J, Roulier R. Embryo score to predict implantation after in vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 1995 10:2427-2431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ziebe S, Petersen K, Lindenberg S, Andersen AG, Gabrielsen A, Andersen AN. Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1997 12:1545-1549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Polz W, Tews G. Embryo fragmentation in vitro and its impact on treatment and pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 2001 76:281-285[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Rutherford AJ, Subak-Sharpe RJ, Dawson KJ, Margara RA, Franks S, Winston RM. Improvement of in vitro fertilisation after treatment with Buserelin, an agonist of luteinising hormone releasing hormone. Br Med J 1988 296:1765-1768
  13. Hillier SG, Dawson KJ, Afnan M, Margara RA, Ryder TA, Wickings EJ, Winston RML. Embryo culture: quality control in in vitro fertilization. In: Thompson W, Joyce DN, Newton JR (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 1984: 125–140
  14. Dawson KJ, Conaghan J, Ostera GR, Winston RM, Hardy K. Delaying transfer to the third day post-insemination, to select non-arrested embryos, increases development to the fetal heart stage. Hum Reprod 1995 10:177-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hardy K, Handyside AH, Winston RM. The human blastocyst: cell number, death and allocation during late preimplantation development in vitro. Development 1989 107:597-604[Abstract]
  16. Fenwick J, Platteau P, Murdoch AP, Herbert M. Time from insemination to first cleavage predicts developmental competence of human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Hum Reprod 2002 17:407-412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Langley MT, Marek DM, Gardner DK, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Extended embryo culture in human assisted reproduction treatments. Hum Reprod 2001 16:902-908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Van Blerkom J, Davis P, Alexander S. A microscopic and biochemical study of fragmentation phenotypes in stage-appropriate human embryos. Hum Reprod 2001 16:719-729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sathananthan H, Bongso A, Ng SC, Ho J, Mok H, Ratnam S. Ultrastructure of preimplantation human embryos co-cultured with human ampullary cells. Hum Reprod 1990 5:309-318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Antczak M, Van Blerkom J. Temporal and spatial aspects of fragmentation in early human embryos: possible effects on developmental competence and association with the differential elimination of regulatory proteins from polarized domains. Hum Reprod 1999 14:429-447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Lehtonen E. Changes in cell dimensions and intercellular contacts during cleavage-stage cell cycles in mouse embryonic cells. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1980 58:231-249[Medline]
  22. Hardy K, Martin KL, Leese HJ, Winston RM, Handyside AH. Human preimplantation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. Hum Reprod 1990 5:708-714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wilton LJ, Trounson AO. Biopsy of preimplantation mouse embryos: development of micromanipulated embryos and proliferation of single blastomeres in vitro. Biol Reprod 1989 40:145-152[Abstract]
  24. Tarin JJ, Conaghan J, Winston RM, Handyside AH. Human embryo biopsy on the 2nd day after insemination for preimplantation diagnosis: removal of a quarter of embryo retards cleavage. Fertil Steril 1992 58:970-976[Medline]
  25. Dozortsev D, Ermilov A, El-Mowafi DM, Diamond M. The impact of cellular fragmentation induced experimentally at different stages of mouse preimplantation development. Hum Reprod 1998 13:1307-1311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Evsikov SV, Morozova LM, Solomko AP. The role of the nucleocytoplasmic ratio in development regulation of the early mouse embryo. Development 1990 109:323-328[Abstract]
  27. Xu K, Rosenwaks Z. The importance of cytoplasm in early embryonic development. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996 13:251-253[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Fleming TP. A quantitative analysis of cell allocation to trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse blastocyst. Dev Biol 1987 119:520-531[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Handyside AH, Hunter S. Cell division and death in the mouse blastocyst before implantation. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 1986 195:519-526[CrossRef]
  30. Hardy K, Stark J. Mathematical models of the balance between apoptosis and proliferation. Apoptosis 2002 7:373-381[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Pellestor F, Dufour MC, Arnal F, Humeau C. Direct assessment of the rate of chromosomal abnormalities in grade IV human embryos produced by in-vitro fertilization procedure. Hum Reprod 1994 9:293-302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Pellestor F, Girardet A, Andreo B, Arnal F, Humeau C. Relationship between morphology and chromosomal constitution in human preimplantation embryo. Mol Reprod Dev 1994 39:141-146[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Munné S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J, Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril 1995 64:382-391[Medline]
  34. Munne S, Cohen J. Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Hum Reprod Update 1998 4:842-855[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Handyside A, Delhanty J. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: strategies and surprises. Trends Genet 1997 13:270-275[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Jamieson ME, Coutts JR, Connor JM. The chromosome constitution of human preimplantation embryos fertilized in vitro. Hum Reprod 1994 9:709-715[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Plachot M, de Grouchy J, Junca AM, Mandelbaum J, Turleau C, Couillin P, Cohen J, Salat-Baroux J. From oocyte to embryo: a model, deduced from in vitro fertilization, for natural selection against chromosome abnormalities. Ann Genet 1987 30:22-32[Medline]
  38. Hardy K, Winston RM, Handyside AH. Binucleate blastomeres in preimplantation human embryos in vitro: failure of cytokinesis during early cleavage. J Reprod Fertil 1993 98:549-558[Abstract]
  39. Braude P, Bolton V, Moore S. Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature 1988 332:459-461[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Tesarík J, Kopecny V, Plachot M, Mandelbaum J. Early morphological signs of embryonic genome expression in human preimplantation development as revealed by quantitative electron microscopy. Dev Biol 1988 128:15-20[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Hardy K, Spanos S, Becker D, Iannelli P, Winston RM, Stark J. From cell death to embryo arrest: mathematical models of human preimplantation embryo development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 98:1655-1660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Hardy K. Cell death in the mammalian blastocyst. Mol Hum Reprod 1997 3:919-925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Jurisicova A, Varmuza S, Casper RF. Programmed cell death and human embryo fragmentation. Mol Hum Reprod 1996 2:93-98[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Morgan K, Wiemer K, Steuerwald N, Hoffman D, Maxson W, Godke R. Use of videocinematography to assess morphological qualities of conventionally cultured and cocultured embryos. Hum Reprod 1995 10:2371-2376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Leese HJ, Donnay I, Thompson JG. Human assisted conception: a cautionary tale. Lessons from domestic animals. Hum Reprod 1998 13: (suppl 4) 184-202



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.W. Browne, W.B. Shelly, M.S. Bloom, A.J. Ocque, J.R. Sandler, H.G. Huddleston, and V.Y. Fujimoto
Distributions of high-density lipoprotein particle components in human follicular fluid and sera and their associations with embryo morphology parameters during IVF
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1884 - 1894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.Y. Turco, K. Matsukawa, M. Czernik, V. Gasperi, N. Battista, L. Della Salda, P.A. Scapolo, P. Loi, M. Maccarrone, and G. Ptak
High levels of anandamide, an endogenous cannabinoid, block the growth of sheep preimplantation embryos by inducing apoptosis and reversible arrest of cell proliferation
Hum. Reprod., July 9, 2008; (2008) den258v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Guerif, A. Le Gouge, B. Giraudeau, J. Poindron, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, and D. Royere
Limited value of morphological assessment at days 1 and 2 to predict blastocyst development potential: A prospective study based on 4042 embryos
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1973 - 1981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W.-H. Chan
Ginkgolide B induces apoptosis and developmental injury in mouse embryonic stem cells and blastocysts
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2985 - 2995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
J. Adjaye, J. Huntriss, R. Herwig, A. BenKahla, T. C. Brink, C. Wierling, C. Hultschig, D. Groth, M.-L. Yaspo, H. M Picton, et al.
Primary Differentiation in the Human Blastocyst: Comparative Molecular Portraits of Inner Cell Mass and Trophectoderm Cells
Stem Cells, October 1, 2005; 23(10): 1514 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Chen, K. Qian, J. Hu, D. Liu, W. Lu, Y. Yang, D. Wang, H. Yan, S. Zhang, and G. Zhu
The derivation of two additional human embryonic stem cell lines from day 3 embryos with low morphological scores
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2201 - 2206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Alikani, T. Schimmel, and S. M. Willadsen
Cytoplasmic fragmentation in activated eggs occurs in the cytokinetic phase of the cell cycle, in lieu of normal cytokinesis, and in response to cytoskeletal disorder
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 11(5): 335 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
N. Esfandiari, T. Falcone, A. Agarwal, M. Attaran, D. R. Nelson, and R. K. Sharma
Protein Supplementation and the Incidence of Apoptosis and Oxidative Stress in Mouse Embryos
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2005; 105(3): 653 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
A. Malamitsi-Puchner, A. Sarandakou, S. Baka, N. Vrachnis, E. Kouskouni, and D. Hassiakos
Soluble Fas Concentrations in the Follicular Fluid and Oocyte-Cumulus Complex Culture Medium From Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: Association With Oocyte Maturity, Fertilization, and Embryo Quality
Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2004; 11(8): 566 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.S. Xu, Y.L. Lee, K.F. Lee, K.L. Kwok, W.M. Lee, J.M. Luk, and W.S.B. Yeung
Embryotrophic factor-3 from human oviductal cells enhances proliferation, suppresses apoptosis and stimulates the expression of the {beta}1 subunit of sodium-potassium ATPase in mouse embryos
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2919 - 2926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Hao, L. Lai, J. Mao, G.-S. Im, A. Bonk, and R. S. Prather
Apoptosis in Parthenogenetic Preimplantation Porcine Embryos
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2004; 70(6): 1644 - 1649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F.-J. Huang, K.-C. Lan, F.-T. Kung, M.-Y. Tsai, C.-Y. Chang, H.-W. Huang, Y.-C. Lin, and S.-Y. Chang
Human cumulus-free oocyte maturational profile and in vitro developmental potential after stimulation with recombinant versus urinary FSH
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 306 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. G. Derhaag, E. Coonen, M. Bras, J.M. Bergers Janssen, R. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin
Chromosomally abnormal cells are not selected for the extra-embryonic compartment of the human preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2565 - 2574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/4/1165    most recent
biolreprod.102.010090v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Winston, R. M.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Winston, R. M.L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Winston, R. M.L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS