Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 30, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008292
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/4/1249    most recent
biolreprod.102.008292v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ibáñez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Overström, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ibáñez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Overström, E. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ibáñez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Overström, E. W.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 1249–1258 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008292
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Reproductive Technology

Demecolcine-Induced Oocyte Enucleation for Somatic Cell Cloning: Coordination Between Cell-Cycle Egress, Kinetics of Cortical Cytoskeletal Interactions, and Second Polar Body Extrusion1

Elena Ibáñez3,a, David F. Albertinib, and Eric W. Overström2,a,b

a Department of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, Massachusetts 01536 b Program in Cell, Molecular and Developmental Biology, Department of Anatomy & Cellular Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Studies were designed to further explore the use of pharmacological agents to produce developmentally competent enucleated mouse oocytes for animal cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Metaphase II oocytes from CF-1 and B6D2F1 strains were activated with ethanol and subsequently exposed to demecolcine at various times postactivation. Chromosome segregation, spindle dynamics, and polar body (PB) extrusion were monitored by fluorescence microscopy using DNA-, microtubule-, and microfilament-selective probes. Exposure to demecolcine did not affect rates of oocyte activation induced by ethanol but did disrupt the coordination of cytokinesis and karyokinesis, suppressing the extent and completion of spindle rotation and second PB extrusion in a strain-dependent manner. Moreover, strain- and treatment-specific variations in the rate of oocyte enucleation were also detected. In particular, CF1 oocytes were more efficiently enucleated relative to B6D2F1 oocytes, and demecolcine treatments initiated early after activation resulted in higher enucleation rates than when treatment was delayed. The observed strain differences are possibly caused by a combination of factors, such as the time course of meiotic cell-cycle progression after ethanol activation, the degree of spindle rotation, and the extent of second PB extrusion. These results suggest that developmentally competent cytoplasts can be produced by timely exposure of activated oocytes to agents that disrupt spindle microtubules. However, the utility of the demecolcine-induced enucleation protocol will require further investigation into factors linking karyokinesis to cytokinesis at the levels of cell-cycle control and oocyte cytoskeletal remodeling following artificial or natural means of egg activation.

developmental biology, gamete biology, meiosis, oocyte development, reproductive technology


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Somatic cell nuclear transfer methods have been developed and used successfully to produce cloned sheep, cattle, mice, goats, and pigs [19]. Two essential cell components are combined to produce a cloned embryo: the donor nuclear genome (karyoplast), which is the target for clonal replication, and the enucleated oocyte (cytoplast), whose cytoplasmic constituency is sufficiently competent to facilitate genome reprogramming and to support embryonic development to term. Thus, the preparation of developmentally competent enucleated oocytes is a key factor that determines the overall success of animal cloning [10].

Traditionally, mammalian oocyte cytoplasts are prepared by physically removing nuclear chromatin by micromanipulation techniques in preparation to receive the donor genome [2, 3]. Enucleated oocytes arrested at metaphase of meiosis II (MII) are subsequently "reconstructed" by the addition of the donor karyoplast, typically using either electrofusion [2] or microinjection techniques [4]. Physical enucleation is technically demanding, time-consuming, inherently invasive, and clearly damaging to cytoplast spatial organization. Moreover, development of reconstructed embryos is inherently inefficient. An alternative strategy to physical enucleation has been to treat oocytes with agents that modify the processes of karyokinesis and cytokinesis and result in chemically enucleated oocytes at high rates (>85% [11, 12]). However, Elsheikh and colleagues [13, 14] have reported that exposure of metaphase I and MII oocytes to etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, and cycloheximide yields enucleated cytoplasts with limited ability to support cleavage or blastocyst development, and to our knowledge, term development of reconstructed embryos has not been reported.

Recently, Baguisi and Overström [15] reported the production of cloned mice from cumulus cell nuclei using cytoplasts enucleated following activation in the presence of a microtubule (MT)-destabilizing drug, demecolcine. Furthermore, this work suggested that demecolcine-induced enucleation may provide cytoplasts of enhanced developmental competence when compared to MII oocytes enucleated by physical means. The reason for enhanced developmental competence remains unclear, but it may result from subtle disturbances in the coordination of cytokinesis and karyokinesis afforded by triggering cell-cycle resumption before exposure to a spindle-disrupting agent. More recently, this demecolcine-induced enucleation protocol has also been applied to the production of cloned mice from embryonic stem cell nuclei [16] and to the production of cloned rabbit fetuses and pigs from adult somatic cells [17, 18].

In the present study, we investigated the temporal consequences of demecolcine-induced enucleation with reference to the cytoskeletal remodeling that occurs during early phases of oocyte activation in CF1 and B6D2F1 mouse strains. In particular, manifestations of demecolcine treatment on spindle rotation/anchoring dynamics and on second polar body (PB) formation and extrusion were investigated.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Collection of Mature Oocytes

Hybrid B6D2F1 (C57BL/6 x DBA/2) and outbred CF-1 female mice (age, 8–12 wk; Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were used as oocyte donors. Animal care and procedures were conducted according to protocols approved by the Tufts University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. A total of 78 B6D2F1 and 66 CF-1 donor females were used. Females were induced to superovulate by i.p. injection of 5 IU of eCG (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) followed 48 h later by 5 IU of hCG (Calbiochem). The MII oocytes were collected from oviducts 16–17 h after hCG administration in Hepes-buffered KSOM (H-KSOM; no. MR-024-D; Specialty Media, Phillipsburg, NJ) and randomly pooled. Cumulus cells were dispersed by incubation in 150 U/ml of bovine testicular hyaluronidase (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in H-KSOM at 37°C for 5 min. Cumulus-free oocytes were then washed three times in fresh H-KSOM and immediately activated.

Oocyte Activation, Treatment, and Culture

Oocytes were parthenogenetically activated by a 5-min exposure to freshly prepared 7% (v/v) ethanol in H-KSOM at 37°C and then washed twice in H-KSOM. Removal of oocytes from ethanol was considered as time 0 postactivation (p.a.). To monitor meiotic progression, activated control oocytes (B6D2F1, n = 214; CF-1, n = 256) were cultured for up to 2 h and 15 min and fixed at 30-min intervals starting at 45 min p.a. (ethanol-activated groups). Culture of activated oocytes was at 37°C under 5% CO2 in air in KSOM medium (no. MR-106-D; Specialty Media) containing 1 mg/ml of BSA and amino acids [19].

Other activated oocytes were treated with the MT-destabilizing drug demecolcine (Sigma) at a concentration of 0.4 µg/ml in KSOM and comprised the Deme treatment groups. These oocytes were cultured in the continued presence of demecolcine starting either immediately after activation (Deme 0 groups; B6D2F1, n = 200; CF-1, n = 199) or with a delay of 5 min (Deme 5 groups; B6D2F1, n = 210; CF-1, n = 202), 10 min (Deme 10 groups; B6D2F1, n = 208; CF-1, n = 207), or 15 min (Deme 15 groups; B6D2F1, n = 198; CF-1, n = 205) after their removal from ethanol. Demecolcine-treated oocytes were fixed at 30-min intervals, from 45 to 135 min p.a., identical to control oocytes. To determine oocyte meiotic status at the onset of demecolcine treatments, some control activated B6D2F1 (n = 251) and CF-1 (n = 267) oocytes were fixed at the same times that drug exposure was initiated in the treatment groups: 0, 5, 10, and 15 min p.a.

Activation and demecolcine treatments were repeated at least three times on separate days. Approximately 50 oocytes were examined per treatment at each defined time-point.

Fixation of Oocytes and Processing for Immunofluorescence Analysis

At defined time-points after activation, control and demecolcine-treated oocytes were fixed and extracted for 30 min at 37°C in a MT-stabilizing buffer containing 0.1 M PIPES, 5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM EGTA, 3.7% (v/v) formaldehyde, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1 µM taxol, 0.01% aprotinin (w/v), 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 50% (v/v) deuterium oxide. Fixed oocytes were stored until processing at 4°C in a PBS blocking solution containing 1% (w/v) BSA, 0.2% (w/v) powdered milk, 2% (v/v) normal goat serum, 0.1 M glycine, 0.2% (w/v) sodium azide, and 0.01% Triton X-100 [20].

A triple-labeling protocol was used for the detection of MTs, microfilaments, and chromatin by fluorescence microscopy [21]. Oocytes were first incubated for 1 h at 37°C in a mixture of mouse monoclonal anti-{alpha}-tubulin and anti-ß-tubulin antibodies (Sigma) at a 1:1000 final dilution. After several washes in 0.1% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)/PBS at room temperature, oocytes were incubated at 37°C in PBS blocking solution for 30 min and then in a 1:150 dilution of a donkey anti-mouse fluorescein-conjugated immunoglobulin G (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 45 min at 37°C. Oocytes were washed again several times in 0.1% PVP/PBS and incubated at 37°C for 30 min in 10 U/ml of Texas Red-conjugated phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) to stain actin filaments. Finally, after extensive washing in 0.1% PVP/PBS, oocytes were incubated at room temperature for 15 min in 10 µg/ml of Hoechst 33258 (Molecular Probes) and mounted in 50% glycerol/PBS containing 25 mg/ml of sodium azide.

Labeled oocytes were examined using a Zeiss IM-35 inverted epifluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) fitted with filters selective for Hoechst, fluorescein, and Texas Red and a 50-W mercury lamp. Selected images were acquired using a Photometrics Cool Snap CCD camera (Roper Scientific, Inc., Trenton, NJ) running on Metamorph software (version 5.0; Universal Imaging Corp., Downington, PA).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed by chi-square test or Fisher exact test. A probability value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To monitor the effects of demecolcine on the meiotic cell-cycle progression after activation and to determine its efficiency in inducing oocyte enucleation, ethanol-activated oocytes of the B6D2F1 and CF-1 mouse strains were cultured in the presence of the drug and analyzed at selected time-points for MT, microfilament, and chromatin organization. Exposure to demecolcine was continuous for 30–135 min starting from 0, 5, 10, or 15 min p.a. Control activated oocytes were cultured for the same period of time in the absence of demecolcine.

Ethanol-Activation Rates Are Not Affected by Demecolcine Treatment

The effect of demecolcine on the meiotic spindle was evident 15 min after the onset of treatment, because spindles in treated oocytes were smaller and displayed a lower MT density compared to untreated control activated oocytes. Although MT density decreased with extended exposure to the drug, spindle MTs did not disappear completely, and even after 2 h of treatment, a few short MTs were detected in the majority of oocytes.

At 45 min p.a., 98% and 92.5% of the control activated B6D2F1 and CF-1 oocytes, respectively, had resumed meiosis, as evidenced by chromatid segregation, spindle elongation, and the presence of a large, actin-rich cortical protrusion or, in a few cases, a completely extruded second PB. These oocytes were considered to be activated (Fig. 1A). Similar rates of activation at 45 min p.a. (80–98%) (Table 1) were observed in all groups of demecolcine-treated oocytes according to the same criteria, except that spindle elongation failed to occur. Although the extent of chromosome separation was reduced due to spindle disruption, two distinct clusters of chromosomes were clearly visible in these treated activated oocytes, indicating that an effective anaphase had occurred. The chromosomes were subcortical to the oocyte cortex and usually connected by a spindle remnant that resembled a midbody (Fig. 1B). As in the control group, a small fraction of oocytes had already extruded a second PB. Interestingly, a single group of chromosomes and no detectable MTs were present in treated oocytes that failed to activate (Fig. 1C).



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Ethanol-activated control and demecolcine-treated mouse oocytes fixed at 45 min p.a. and stained for MTs, chromatin, and microfilaments. For each oocyte, antitubulin (green) and Hoechst 33258 (blue) staining patterns are shown on the left (A1C1), and phalloidin (red) staining pattern is shown on the right (A2C2). A) Control activated oocyte at telophase II extruding a second PB. B) Activated demecolcine-treated oocyte showing two sets of chromosomes connected by spindle remnants and two cortical protrusions. C) Demecolcine-treated oocyte that failed to activate, showing a single group of chromosomes and no MTs. Note the green background in the cytoplasm of the demecolcine-treated oocytes (B1 and C1) because of MT depolymerization. First polar bodies are not visible in any of the oocytes


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Activation rates of ethanol-activated oocytes and ethanol-activated oocytes treated with demecolcine at different times (0–15 min) postactivation

In the B6D2F1 strain, activation rates of demecolcine-treated oocytes were equivalent to those of nontreated control oocytes at all time-points examined (Table 1). Rates of activation in some groups of CF-1 treated oocytes were lower than in the control group at 75 and 105 min p.a. However, this effect was transitory and reversible, because at 135 min after ethanol exposure, activation rates were again equivalent among all groups. Therefore, normal rates of activation are obtained when activated oocytes are cultured in the continuous presence of demecolcine.

Effect of Demecolcine on Spindle Rotation in Activated Oocytes

As noted by others [22], two cortical protrusions formed adjacent to each spindle pole shortly after activation in nontreated control oocytes. One protrusion then regressed as the spindle rotated toward the remaining protrusion and assumed an orientation perpendicular to the plasma membrane (Fig. 2). Eventually, this structure was constricted at the oolemma and gave rise to the second PB. Activated oocytes treated with demecolcine yielded two classes that displayed either a single (type A oocyte) or a double (type B oocyte) cortical protrusion overlying the remnants of the spindle (Fig. 3). The two sets of chromosomes were closer to each other in type A oocytes than in type B oocytes, suggesting that the formation of one or two protrusions was probably dependent on the extent of meiotic cell-cycle progression before spindle disruption. Consistent with this idea, type A oocytes were more frequently observed when demecolcine treatment started immediately or 5 min after activation (Deme 0 and Deme 5 groups, respectively), whereas the incidence of type B oocytes predominated when treatment was delayed for 10 or 15 min (Deme 10 and Deme 15 groups, respectively; data not shown).



View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Progression of spindle rotation and initiation of second PB formation in ethanol-activated control oocytes (see text for details). For each oocyte, antitubulin (green) and Hoechst 33258 (blue) staining patterns are shown on the left (A1C1), and phalloidin (red) staining pattern is shown on the right (A2C2). Arrowheads indicate the presence of the first PB



View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Activated demecolcine-treated oocytes showing a single (type A oocyte; A1 and A2) or double (type B oocyte; B1 and B2) cortical protrusions overlying the two sites of chromosomes and the remnants of the spindle. For each oocyte, antitubulin (green) and Hoechst 33258 (blue) staining patterns are shown on the left (A1 and B1), and phalloidin (red) staining pattern is shown on the right (A2 and B2). Arrowhead indicates the presence of the first PB (out of focus)

Initiation of spindle rotation occurred in all groups of demecolcine-treated oocytes, except for the Deme 0 group in the CF-1 strain, but at lower rates than in control activated oocytes (Table 2). Although only a few short spindle MTs were present in treated oocytes, orientation of spindle remnants and the two chromosomal sets relative to the plasma membrane was used as an indicator of spindle rotation. The CF-1 oocytes treated with demecolcine consistently exhibited a comparatively low percentage of activated oocytes undergoing a partial or complete spindle rotation at all p.a. time-points examined. Demecolcine also impaired spindle rotation in B6D2F1 oocytes at 45 and 75 min p.a. compared to the controls, but the effect was less pronounced than in CF-1 oocytes. However, a dramatic decrease in the percentage of treated B6D2F1 oocytes showing spindle rotation occurred in all treatment groups at 105 and 135 min p.a., suggesting that spindle rotation was reversed with prolonged drug exposure. By 135 min p.a. oocytes showing complete spindle rotation were observed in only 0–9.6% of the CF-1 and B6D2F1 treated oocytes, compared to 100% in both control groups, and the lack of differences between demecolcine treatments further attested to the effectiveness of demecolcine on spindle rotation. In all control and treated oocytes showing a completely rotated spindle at 135 min p.a., extrusion of the second PB had occurred. Together, these results indicate that continued exposure to demecolcine after oocyte activation inhibits spindle rotation independent of the time of initiation of the treatment and the strain of the oocyte, although the kinetics of this inhibition varies between strains.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Spindle rotation in ethanol-activated oocytes and ethanol-activated oocytes treated with demecolcine at different times (0–15 min) postactivation

Complete Extrusion of the Second PB Is Inhibited in the Presence of Demecolcine

Whereas the onset of second PB formation was evident in all treated activated oocytes, forming one or two cortical protrusions overlying chromosomes, completion of second PB extrusion was impaired in the presence of demecolcine. By 45 min p.a., a small and similar percentage of activated control and treated oocytes displayed a completely extruded second PB (Fig. 4). The rates of PB extrusion in B6D2F1 and CF-1 control oocytes increased progressively with time, reaching 100% at 135 min p.a., but complete PB extrusion in demecolcine-treated oocytes from both strains was significantly decreased, with rates ranging from 23.1% to 70.2% at the various p.a. time-points examined. Even though some differences were detected between treatments in both strains, a correlation between rates of second PB extrusion and the onset of demecolcine treatment could not be established. On the other hand, comparison of second PB extrusion rates in demecolcine-treated oocytes from both strains revealed significant differences between Deme 10 groups at 75 min p.a., between all treatment groups at 105 min p.a., and between Deme 0, Deme 10, and Deme 15 groups at 135 min p.a. These results suggest a strain-dependent effect of demecolcine on the suppression of second PB extrusion, being more pronounced in oocytes from the CF-1 strain.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Time course of complete second PB extrusion in ethanol-activated oocytes (EtOH) and ethanol-activated oocytes treated with demecolcine (Deme) at different times (0, 5, 10, and 15 min) p.a. Oocytes of the B6D2F1 (A) and CF-1 (B) strains were analyzed by immunofluorescence at several time-points after activation to assess second PB extrusion. Different superscripts represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between different treatments for each time-point and strain

In those demecolcine-treated oocytes that failed to extrude a second PB, cortical protrusions enlarged over time and, in some oocytes, showed signs of constriction at the oolemma (Fig. 5). To determine whether PB extrusion was merely delayed in these oocytes, they were cultured for a longer period of time (4 h) before fixation and analysis. In most of the oocytes, the cortical protrusions were reabsorbed, whereas the formation of two pronuclei indicated that the cell cycle progressed to early interphase.



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Demecolcine-treated oocyte at 135 min p.a. with one first PB (arrowhead) and two partially extruded second PBs. Antitubulin (green) and Hoechst 33258 (blue) staining patterns are shown (A), as is phalloidin (red) staining pattern (B). All the oocyte chromatin is enclosed in the two cortical protrusions, which show some degree of constriction at the oolema

Characteristic Phenotypes Are Observed in Activated Oocytes Treated with Demecolcine that Complete Second PB Extrusion

All control activated oocytes extruded a second PB containing half of the chromosomal complement and displayed a midbody perpendicular to the plasma membrane. This phenotype was classified as type C (Fig. 6A) and was also observed in a fraction of demecolcine-treated oocytes with completely extruded second PBs. However, midbodies in treated type C oocytes were narrower and shorter than in control activated type C oocytes and were defined as midbody-like structures. Other treated oocytes that completed second PB extrusion displayed characteristic phenotypes that were never detected in control activated oocytes. Type D oocytes (Fig. 6B) deployed one set of chromosomes in the oocyte cytoplasm and one set inside the extruded second PB, connected by a midbody-like structure as in type C oocytes. However, in type D oocytes, the midbody-like structure was oriented in parallel to the plasma membrane, indicating that spindle rotation had not occurred. Moreover, a prominent protuberance adjacent to the second PB was present in type D oocytes, probably caused by the subcortical position of the chromosomal complement in the oocyte in the absence of spindle rotation. Other demecolcine-treated oocytes displayed two (type E) (Fig. 6C) or one (type F) (Fig. 6D) completely extruded second PBs that contained all chromosomes. Therefore, types E and F represent totally enucleated oocytes. Rotation of the spindle had not occurred in these oocytes either, as evidenced by the parallel orientation of the remaining spindle MTs and the two sets of chromosomes inside the PB relative to the plasma membrane.



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Phenotypes of activated control and demecolcine-treated oocytes that completed second PB extrusion (see text for details). For each oocyte, antitubulin (green) and Hoechst 33258 (blue) staining patterns are shown on the left (A1D1), and phalloidin (red) staining pattern is shown on the right (A2D2). A control activated type C oocyte is shown (A), whereas type D (B), type E (C), and type F (D) correspond to activated oocytes treated with demecolcine. Oocytes in C and D are enucleated. Arrowheads indicate the presence of the first PB

The frequency of each of these phenotypes varied according to the onset of the demecolcine treatment with regards to activation, duration of treatment, and strain of oocyte, further indicating variability in the responsiveness to demecolcine (Fig. 7). In B6D2F1 oocytes, type C was the most frequent at 45 and 75 min p.a. in all treatments, except for the Deme 0 group, in which it was detected at a rate similar to that of type D. Prolonged exposure, independent of when treatment was initiated, caused a shift to the type D phenotype, as seen by the high percentage of type D oocytes at 135 min p.a. in all treatments. The CF-1 oocytes exhibited a strikingly different response. For all treatments, type F was the main phenotype in those oocytes that completed second PB extrusion by 45 min p.a. An increase in the frequency of type D oocytes was observed over time, and at 135 min p.a., type D and type F oocytes appeared at a similar frequency, except for the Deme 5 group, in which most of the oocytes were still of type F.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Frequencies of the various phenotypes detected in B6D2F1 and CF-1 oocytes that were treated with demecolcine (Deme) at different times (0, 5, 10, and 15 min) p.a. and that completed second PB extrusion (see also Fig. 6). Results at four different time-points after activation are shown for each treatment and oocyte strain

Treatment of Activated Oocytes with Demecolcine Induces Enucleation in a Strain-Dependent Manner

According to the previous results, most CF-1 oocytes that completed extrusion of the second PB were enucleated as a result of demecolcine exposure, whereas the majority of treated B6D2F1 oocytes retained half of the chromosomal complement. This result is summarized in Figure 8, which shows the combined results from all time-points examined for the total oocytes enucleated as a result of the various demecolcine treatments applied. Enucleation rates ranging from 48.3% to 76.7% were obtained in those CF-1 oocytes that completed second PB extrusion and from 1% to 17.3% in the B6D2F1 strain (Fig. 8A). In the four treatments applied, the rates of enucleation were significantly higher in CF-1 than in B6D2F1 oocytes, indicating that the efficiency of demecolcine in inducing oocyte enucleation was strain-dependent. Moreover, enucleation efficiency was also dependent on the time at which treatment was initiated p.a., as indicated by the higher enucleation rates obtained in both strains of oocytes when demecolcine treatment was initiated sooner rather than later after activation.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Enucleation rates in ethanol-activated B6D2F1 and CF-1 oocytes treated with demecolcine (Deme) at different times (0, 5, 10 and 15 min) p.a. The percentages of enucleated oocytes of only those activated oocytes that completed second PB extrusion (A) and of the total activated oocytes (B) are shown. The value in each treatment represents the combined results for all four time-points examined (45, 75, 105, and 135 min p.a.). Different superscripts represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments for each strain of oocytes. Values for each treatment in A and B differ significantly between strains (not shown)

Because of the low rates of complete PB extrusion in demecolcine-treated oocytes, a dramatic decrease in the rates of enucleation is observed when the total activated oocytes are considered (Fig. 8B). Maximum enucleation rates of only 21% and 6.9% in CF-1 and B6D2F1 oocytes, respectively, were obtained, and again, the enucleation efficiency in all four treatments was higher in CF-1 than in B6D2F1 oocytes. Although enucleation rates of the total activated oocytes were equivalent between treatments in CF-1 oocytes, some differences were detected between B6D2F1 oocytes subjected to different treatments. These differences indicated, again, that exposure to demecolcine early after activation results in higher rates of enucleation than when the treatment is delayed.

Meiotic Cell-Cycle Progression after Activation Is Strain-Dependent

To determine if the different efficiencies of demecolcine for inducing enucleation in CF-1 and B6D2F1 oocytes could be related to variations in the oocyte meiotic progression after activation, some control activated oocytes were fixed at the same time-points p.a. at which the demecolcine treatments were initiated. Because the effects of demecolcine on the meiotic spindle are not immediate, the meiotic progression at 45 min p.a. was also recorded. Although the time course of activation was similar in oocytes from the two strains, the rate of cell-cycle progression after the activation stimulus was slightly different (Table 3). Release from MII arrest and entry into anaphase followed a similar progression in the two groups of oocytes after ethanol exposure, but the anaphase-telophase transition proceeded faster in CF-1 oocytes. Thus, 2.6% and 4.4% of activated CF-1 oocytes were at telophase II at 10 and 15 min p.a., respectively, whereas all activated B6D2F1 oocytes remained at anaphase II. By 45 min p.a., 87.1% of activated CF-1 oocytes had entered telophase II, a value significantly higher than the 60% observed for activated B6D2F1 oocytes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Time course of activation rates and meiotic status of B6D2F1 and CF-1 oocytes after ethanol activation


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The MT-destabilizing drug demecolcine was previously used in our laboratory to induce enucleation of preactivated mouse oocytes of the B6D2F1 strain as a means to prepare competent cytoplasts for nuclear transfer procedures [15]. To further explore the utility of this procedure, we have extended these studies to investigate the relationship between oocyte cell-cycle control and the cytoskeleton during exit from meiotic metaphase (M phase).

Resumption of meiosis after fertilization or artificial activation of MII-arrested oocytes is characterized by chromosome segregation to the spindle poles, elongation and rotation of the meiotic spindle, and extrusion of a second PB containing half the chromosomal complement of the oocyte. M-phase exit is triggered by the inactivation of maturation-promoting factor (MPF), and it is now well established that cyclin B degradation (and, thus, MPF inactivation) requires an intact spindle [23]. Consistent with this, MII oocytes treated with demecolcine or nocodazole before in vitro fertilization or parthenogenetic activation remain arrested in the M phase despite the occurrence of a normal pattern of calcium oscillations [24, 25]. The exact mechanism by which the meiotic spindle mediates the transition from meiotic M phase to embryonic interphase remains unclear. In the present study, oocytes activated with ethanol before demecolcine treatment exhibited activation rates comparable to those of activated control oocytes never exposed to demecolcine. Ethanol exposure induces an immediate increase in intracellular calcium [26] and rapid progression into anaphase, as evidenced by the rapidity of meiotic cell-cycle resumption in control activated oocytes from the two strains analyzed in this work. Because a delay exists between the onset of demecolcine application and detectable signs of spindle MT disruption, it is not surprising that the acute effects of ethanol on cell-cycle resumption are not impeded. In fact, as our results in control activated oocytes show, most oocytes (>=60%) exited M phase and progressed to anaphase by the end of the 5-min ethanol exposure (0 min p.a.). Therefore, most of the oocytes were already at anaphase II or the anaphase-telophase transition when the demecolcine treatment was applied. We show here that when demecolcine is applied after the activation stimulus, activation proceeds in the presence of the drug. However, at later stages, clear consequences of demecolcine exposure occurred that altered the relationship between karyokinesis and cytokinesis.

Demecolcine binds tightly to tubulin dimers and prevents MT polymerization, resulting in the loss of dynamic spindle MTs in mitotic and meiotic cells. Immunofluorescence staining with antitubulin antibodies allowed us to confirm the time course and extent of spindle disruption by demecolcine and, furthermore, showed that few short MTs remain in the majority of oocytes even after prolonged (2-h) drug exposure. The presence of these spindle remnants may reflect differential stability of some MTs in the spindle, and they likely correspond to interpolar MTs [27]. Not surprisingly, spindle disruption impaired the extent of chromatid segregation under these conditions. However, because oocytes were activated before demecolcine treatment, the variable degrees of chromosome segregation that we observed most likely resulted from the time of demecolcine administration, its uptake kinetics, and variations in anaphase onset or duration. These results establish that cell-cycle activation occurs before gross disruptions of spindle stability.

In early telophase, the meiotic spindle rotates from a parallel to a perpendicular orientation relative to the plasma membrane coincident with the initiation of second PB formation (Fig. 2) [22]. Although the mechanism of spindle rotation is unclear, the presence of an actin-rich cortical domain overlying the spindle [28], coupled with the inhibition of spindle rotation in both mouse and Xenopus oocytes treated with cytochalasin [28, 29], suggests that the interaction of spindle MTs with actin filaments of the cell cortex mediates spindle rotation and coordinates karyokinesis and cytokinesis. Consistent with this, disruption of the spindle should also inhibit its rotation, as our results with demecolcine demonstrate. In fact, some demecolcine-treated oocytes undergo some degree of spindle rotation, especially in the case of B6D2F1 eggs, but the process is completed in less than 10% of the oocytes. These observations suggest that spindle rotation is initiated before demecolcine induces depolymerization of the spindle MTs, which as a result perturbs interactions between MTs and cortical microfilaments and impairs further rotation of the spindle. Although suppression of spindle rotation occurred in both strains of oocytes examined, the percentage of oocytes with partially or completely rotated spindles at 45 and 75 min p.a. was higher in the B6D2F1 than in the CF-1 strain. This result indicates strain-dependent variation in the kinetics of inhibition of spindle rotation induced by demecolcine that cannot be related to interstrain differences in the initiation and progression of spindle rotation or the rate of cell-cycle progression (as detected in control activated oocytes from the two strains). Thus, these strain-dependent variations may result from other factors associated with elongation and anchoring of the spindle, such as centrosome positioning [30].

As our results show, an additional effect of demecolcine on activated oocytes was inhibition of second PB extrusion. The initial phase of PB formation, described by Maro et al. [28] within in vitro-fertilized mouse eggs as a "furrowing" of the plasma membrane in the region overlying the spindle, was observed in most demecolcine-treated oocytes. This was evidenced by the formation of one or two actin-rich cortical protrusions. However, later "furrow constriction" and abscission was generally impaired in oocytes activated in the presence of demecolcine. In fact, nocodazole or demecolcine treatment before furrowing and cleavage in sea urchin eggs has shown that MTs are required for furrow stimulation and formation of the actomyosin contractile ring; however, once furrowing has been stimulated, MTs are unnecessary [31]. This and other studies in mammalian tissue culture cells have also demonstrated that MTs are essential for abscission, because depolymerization of the central spindle in late anaphase blocks the completion of cytokinesis [32]. Several proteins necessary for cytokinesis have been localized to the central spindle [33], and it has been suggested that MTs may serve as tracks along which these proteins and other components of the cell move into the cleavage furrow [3436]. Specifically, the presence of a functional midbody is required in mammalian cells to complete division. Formation of the midbody begins in anaphase, when MT bundles assemble in the central spindle, but functional midbody assembly also requires formation of new MTs nucleated by {gamma}-tubulin centers during telophase [37, 38]. In view of this, suppression of new MT polymerization would be expected in demecolcine-treated oocytes and could underlie the inhibition of second PB extrusion. Interestingly, midbody-like structures were detected in some of the treated oocytes that completed second PB extrusion, and specifically in all type C and type D oocytes. Because MTs that form the central spindle and the midbody are extremely stable [39], it is possible that some MT bundles could assemble in these oocytes before extensive MT depolymerization, forming a midbody-like structure that persisted. However, detection of these midbody-like structures in oocytes with a completely extruded second PB argues against the need for newly nucleated MTs in the completion of cytokinesis, unless this was not required for PB abscission or a different mechanism was used in these oocytes to complete division. In fact, second PB extrusion in type E and type F oocytes was completed in the absence of a midbody or a midbody-like structure. Spindle rotation had not occurred in these oocytes, and the spindle remnants, together with all chromosomes, were extruded inside the second PB, leaving an enucleated oocyte. Interestingly, chemically enucleated mouse oocytes produced by a combined treatment with etoposide and cycloheximide also extrude PBs containing all oocyte chromosomes without involvement of the spindle [12]. Completion of cytokinesis in the absence of MTs has also been reported in other studies [31, 37], and a midbody-independent mechanism for cytokinesis has been proposed to exist in mammalian cells [40]. Thus, it is also possible that in all or some of the demecolcine-treated oocytes that completed second PB extrusion, this alternative mechanism was used because of the absence of a midbody or the presence of a nonfunctional midbody-like structure. The mechanism of PB extrusion and its dependence on midbody integrity will require further study.

Suppression of second PB extrusion in the presence of demecolcine was independent of the time of treatment but was dependent on the strain of the oocytes tested. In general, the incidence of second PB extrusion was lower in treated CF-1 than in treated B6D2F1 oocytes. Almost all treated B6D2F1 oocytes with an extruded second PB were of type C or type D and exhibited a midbody-like structure. On the other hand, as our results in control activated oocytes show, extrusion of the second PB seems to proceed somewhat faster in the B6D2F1 strain (Fig. 4). Therefore, strain-specific variations in the time course of midbody formation and second PB extrusion may explain the observed differences between treated CF-1 and treated B6D2F1 oocytes.

As expected from previous work [15], timely perturbation in spindle function during second PB extrusion also resulted in oocyte enucleation. Inhibition of spindle rotation and the extent of chromosome migration in the presence of demecolcine probably contributed to the expulsion of the entire chromosome complement inside one or, occasionally, two second PBs. As our results show, the onset of the demecolcine treatment in relation to activation is key to achieving enucleation. Application of demecolcine either immediately or a few minutes after ethanol exposure results in higher enucleation rates than application of the drug 15 min after activation, which suggests that the extent of chromatid segregation is a key determinant of enucleation. In addition, a strain effect was also observed for enucleation efficiency, but the reasons for this are unclear. If the proximity of the two groups of chromosomes was decisive for enucleation, then slower progression into telophase after activation would favor enucleation. However, a faster anaphase-telophase transition was observed in control activated oocytes of the CF-1 strain, with higher rates of enucleation in all demecolcine treatments, than was observed in the B6D2F1 strain, with lower rates of enucleation. Thus, other parameters must account for the strain-dependent efficiency of enucleation. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying demecolcine-induced enucleation before this technique can be efficiently applied for oocyte enucleation in various strains and species.

The majority of CF-1 oocytes treated with demecolcine that completed second PB extrusion were enucleated, and enucleation rates close to 80% were obtained. However, because many activated oocytes failed to complete second PB extrusion, the overall enucleation efficiency approximated 20%. Therefore, at least in the CF-1 strain, impairment of PB extrusion is a limitation to enucleation. Similar results have been obtained in demecolcine-treated goat and bovine activated eggs [41, 42]. Shorter treatments with demecolcine, which would allow MT regeneration by late telophase, may promote the completion of second PB extrusion. In fact, preliminary studies with oocytes exposed to demecolcine for only 15, 30, or 45 min resulted in slightly higher rates of second PB extrusion, but the rates of oocyte enucleation were also reduced (unpublished results). Because the effects of demecolcine on MT depolymerization and regeneration are not immediate with respect to time of application and removal, synchronization of treatment with oocyte cell-cycle stage may be difficult to achieve. Possibly, the use of other MT-disrupting drugs that have more rapid and reversible effects, such as nocodazole, may provide better control over the integration of cytokinesis and karyokinesis.

In conclusion, we have shown that culture of activated mouse oocytes in the presence of demecolcine results in normal rates of oocyte activation and progressive cytoskeletal changes after activation. Disruption of spindle MTs by demecolcine impairs chromosome migration, suppresses spindle rotation, inhibits second PB extrusion, alters chromosome partitioning, and thereby, results in the generation of enucleated oocytes. Enucleation efficiency depends on both the onset of the demecolcine treatment in relation to oocyte activation and the genetic background of the oocyte. Further studies are needed to better characterize the mechanism of demecolcine-induced enucleation to establish a more efficient protocol for the enucleation of oocytes of various strains and species in nuclear transfer procedures. In addition, because MTs play a key role in many cellular processes during embryonic development, the potential side effects of MT-disrupting drugs on development of reconstructed embryos must be examined. However, production of live cloned mice from both cumulus and embryonic stem cell nuclei [15, 16] using demecolcine-enucleated cytoplasts demonstrates the potential of this new technique for nuclear transfer practice and indicates that, when used in this way, long-term effects may be minimized.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Alexander Baguisi for advice on demecolcine-induced enucleation technique and Catherine Combelles, Daniela Fischer, and Alexandra Sanfins for helpful discussions.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported in part by USDA-NRI 2001-35205-09966, Charles River Laboratories, and a Fulbright grant sponsored by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture & Sports (E.I.). Back

2 Correspondence. FAX: 508 839 7091; eric.overstrom{at}tufts.edu Back

3 Current address: Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Facultat de Ciències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain Back

Received: 12 June 2002.

First decision: 1 August 2002.

Accepted: 21 October 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Campbell KHS, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I. Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 1996 380:64-66[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997 385:810-813[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Cibelli JB, Stice SL, Golouke PJ, Kane JJ, Jerry J, Blackwell C, Ponce de Leon FA, Robl JM. Cloned transgenic calves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts. Science 1998 280:1256-1258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wakayama T, Perry ACF, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 1998 394:369-374[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Baguisi A, Behboodi E, Melican DT, Pollock JS, Destrempes MM, Cammuso C, Williams JL, Nims SD, Porter CA, Midura P, Palacios MJ, Ayres SL, Denniston RS, Hayes ML, Ziomek CA, Meade HM, Godke RA, Gavin WG, Overström EW, Echelard Y. Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nature Biotechnology 1999 17:456-461[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Wells DN, Misica PM, Tervit HR. Production of cloned calves following nuclear transfer with cultured adult mural granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 1999 60:996-1005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Betthauser J, Forsberg E, Augenstein M, Childs L, Eilertsen K, Enos J, Forsythe T, Golueke P, Jurgella G, Koppang R, Lesmeister T, Mallon K, Mell G, Misica P, Pace M, Pfister-Genskow M, Strelchenko N, Voelker G, Watt S, Thompson S, Bishop M. Production of cloned pigs from in vitro systems. Nat Biotechnol 2000 18:1055-1059[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H, Perry ACF. Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science 2000 289:1188-1190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KHS. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 2000 407:86-90[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Campbell KHS, Loi P, Otaegui P, Wilmut I. Cell cycle coordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Rev Reprod 1996 1:40-46[Abstract]
  11. Fulka J Jr, Moor RM. Noninvasive chemical enucleation of mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1993 34:427-430[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Karnikova L, Horska M, Tomanek M, Kanka J, Urban F, Moor R, Fulka J Jr. Chemically enucleated mouse oocytes: ultrastructure and kinetics of histone H1 kinase activity. Reprod Nutr Dev 1998 38:643-651
  13. Elsheikh AS, Takahashi Y, Hishinuma M, Kanagawa H. Developmental ability of mouse late 2-cell stage blastomeres fused to chemically enucleated oocytes in vitro. J Vet Med Sci 1997 59:107-113[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Elsheikh AS, Takahashi Y, Katagiri S, Kanagawa H. Functional enucleation of mouse metaphase II oocytes with etoposide. Jpn J Vet Res 1998 45:217-220[Medline]
  15. Baguisi A, Overström EW. Induced enucleation in nuclear transfer procedures to produce cloned animals. Theriogenology 2000 54:209 (abstract) [CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Gasparrini B, Gao S, Ainslie A, Fletcher J, McGarry M, Ritchie WA, Springbett AJ, Overström EW, Wilmut I, De Sousa PA. Cloned mice derived from embryonic stem cell karyoplasts and activated cytoplasts prepared by induced enucleation. Biol Reprod 2003 68:1259-1266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Yin XJ, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. Effect of enucleation procedures and maturation conditions on the development of nuclear-transferred rabbit oocytes receiving male fibroblast cells. Reproduction 2002 124:41-47[Abstract]
  18. Yin XJ, Tani T, Yonemura I, Kawakami M, Miyamoto K, Hasegawa R, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. Production of cloned pigs from adult somatic cells by chemically assisted removal of maternal chromosomes. Biol Reprod 2002 67:442-446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Biggers JD, McGuinnis LK, Raffin M. Amino acids and preimplantation development of the mouse in the protein-free KSOM. Biol Reprod 2000 63:281-293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Wickramasinghe D, Albertini DF. Centrosome phosphorylation and the developmental expression of meiotic competence in mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 1992 152:62-74[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Herman B, Langevin MA, Albertini DF. The effects of taxol in the organization of the cytoskeleton in cultured ovarian granulosa cells. Eur J Cell Biol 1983 31:34-45[Medline]
  22. Liu L, Trimarchi JR, Oldenbourg R, Keefe DL. Increased birefringence in the meiotic spindle provides a new marker for the onset of activation in living oocytes. Biol Reprod 2000 63:251-258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kubiak JZ, Weber M, de Pennart H, Winston NJ, Maro B. The metaphase II arrest in mouse oocytes is controlled through microtubule-dependent destruction of cyclin B in the presence of CSF. EMBO J 1993 12:3773-3778[Medline]
  24. Winston NJ, McGuinness O, Johnson MH, Maro B. The exit of mouse oocytes from meiotic M phase requires an intact spindle during intracellular calcium release. J Cell Sci 1993 108:143-151
  25. Moses R, Kline D, Masui Y. Maintenance of metaphase in colcemid-treated mouse eggs by distinct calcium- and 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP)-sensitive mechanisms. Dev Biol 1995 167:329-337[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Ilyin V, Parker I. Effects of alcohols on responses evoked by inositol trisphosphate in Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol 1992 448:339-354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Combelles CM, Albertini DF. Microtubule patterning during meiotic maturation in mouse oocytes is determined by cell cycle-specific sorting and redistribution of {gamma}-tubulin. Dev Biol 2001 239:281-294[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Maro B, Johnson MH, Pickering SJ, Flach G. Changes in actin distribution during fertilization of the mouse egg. J Embryol Exp Morph 1984 81:211-237[Medline]
  29. Gard DL, Cha BJ, Schroeder MM. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of microtubules, microtubule-associated proteins, and microtubule-organizing centers during amphibian oogenesis and early development. Curr Top Dev Biol 1995 31:383-431[Medline]
  30. Carabatsos MJ, Combelles CM, Messinger SM, Albertini DF. Sorting and reorganization of centrosomes during oocyte maturation in the mouse. Microsc Res Tech 2000 49:435-444[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Larkin K, Danilchik MV. Microtubules are required for completion of cytokinesis in sea urchin eggs. Dev Biol 1999 214:215-226[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Wheatley SP, Wang Y. Midzone microtubule bundles are continuously required for cytokinesis in cultured epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 1996 135:981-989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Glotzer M. Animal cell cytokinesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2000 17:351-386[CrossRef]
  34. Cao L-G, Wang Y-L. Signals from the spindle midzone are required for the stimulation of cytokinesis in cultured epithelial cells. Mol Biol Cell 1996 7:225-232[Abstract]
  35. Danilchik MV, Funk WC, Brown EE, Larkin K. Requirement for microtubules in new membrane formation during cytokinesis of Xenopus embryos. Dev Biol 1998 194:47-60[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Mitsuyama F, Sawai T. The redistribution of Ca2+-stores with inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor to the cleavage furrow in a microtubule-dependent manner. Int J Dev Biol 2001 45:861-868[Medline]
  37. Julian M, Tollon Y, Lajoie-Mazenc I, Moisand A, Mazarguil H, Puget A, Wright M. {gamma}-Tubulin participates in the formation of the midbody during cytokinesis in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 1993 105:145-156[Abstract]
  38. Shu H-B, Li Z, Palacios MJ, Li Q, Joshi HC. A transient association of {gamma}-tubulin at the midbody is required for the completion of cytokinesis during the mammalian cell division. J Cell Sci 1995 108:2955-2962[Abstract]
  39. Savoian MS, Earnshaw WC, Khodjakov A, Rieder CL. Cleavage furrows formed between centrosomes lacking an intervening spindle and chromosomes contain microtubule bundles, INCENP and CHO1 but not CENP-E. Mol Biol Cell 1999 10:297-311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Wheatley SP, Hinccliffe EH, Glotzer M, Hyman AA, Sluder G, Wang Y-L. CDK1 inactivation regulates anaphase spindle dynamics and cytokinesis in vivo. J Cell Biol 1997 138:385-393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Ibáñez E, Sanfins A, Combelles C, Albertini DF, Overström EW. Induced enucleation of mouse and goat oocytes: kinetic and phenotypic characterizations. Theriogenology 2002 57:421 (abstract) [CrossRef]
  42. Fischer D, Ibáñez E, Cibelli J, Albertini DF, Overström EW. Activated bovine cytoplasts produced by induced enucleation support development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos in vitro. Biol Reprod 2002 66:suppl 1238 (abstract 346)



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E. Ibanez, D. F Albertini, and E. W Overstrom
Effect of genetic background and activating stimulus on the timing of meiotic cell cycle progression in parthenogenetically activated mouse oocytes
Reproduction, January 1, 2005; 129(1): 27 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/4/1249    most recent
biolreprod.102.008292v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ibáñez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Overström, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ibáñez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Overström, E. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ibáñez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Overström, E. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS