Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print November 27, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.009282
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/5/1538    most recent
biolreprod.102.009282v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tranguch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Huet-Hudson, Y. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tranguch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Huet-Hudson, Y. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tranguch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Huet-Hudson, Y. M.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 1538–1544 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.009282
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Embryo

Nitric Oxide Synthase Production and Nitric Oxide Regulation of Preimplantation Embryo Development

Susanne Tranguch2, Nury Steuerwald2,3, and Yvette M. Huet-Hudson1,2

Department of Biology,2 University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223 A.R.T. Institute of Washington,3 Washington, D.C


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Nitric oxide (NO) production plays an important role in regulating preimplantation embryo development. NO is produced from L-arginine by the enzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS), which has three isoforms: endothelial (eNOS), neuronal (nNOS), and inducible (iNOS). It has been previously shown that inhibition of NO production by NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NA) inhibits the development of two-cell embryos to the four-cell stage. However, excess NO also halts embryo development, possibly through the production of free radicals. We hypothesize that multiple NOS isoforms are expressed in order to ensure normal preimplantation embryo development and that, in this process, NO acts through the cGMP pathway. Using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, mRNA for all three NOS isoforms was amplified from two-cell, four-cell, morula, and blastocyst embryos. However, blastocyst-stage embryos isolated midmorning on Day 4 of pregnancy expressed only nNOS and eNOS, whereas those isolated midafternoon again expressed all three NOS isoforms. Culture of one-cell embryos in various concentrations of Whitten (positive control), S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNP, a NO donor), L-NA, and/or 8-Br-cGMP demonstrated that NO is acting, at least in part, through cGMP in preimplantation embryo development. In addition, we determined that a critical concentration of NO and cGMP is required for normal embryo development and deviations from this concentration lead to developmental arrest and/or apoptosis of the embryo. This data provides support for a requirement of NO in preimplantation embryo development and one mechanism through which it regulates mitotic division in these embryos.

apoptosis, early development, embryo, nitric oxide


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous, free-radical molecule that acts as an intracellular messenger and regulates various reproductive processes, such as steroidogenesis, pregnancy, folliculogenesis, and tissue remodeling [1]. NO is produced through the oxidation of L-arginine to L-citrulline by the enzyme NO synthase (NOS). Three isoforms of NOS exist, namely neuronal (bNOS/nNOS/NOS1), endothelial (eNOS/NOS2), and inducible (iNOS/NOS2) [2].

It has previously been demonstrated in our laboratory, using immunocytochemistry, that delayed blastocysts following estrogen activation at 1 h produce both eNOS and iNOS proteins [3]. It has also been shown that an increase in iNOS occurs in both the uterus and the implanting embryo. In pre- and peri-implantation embryos, iNOS was shown to be localized to the inner cell mass. Postimplantation embryos showed decreased iNOS localization [4]. However, it is not known whether all three isoforms are present in earlier stage embryos, specifically preimplantation embryos.

Numerous studies have shown that NO mediates many of its effects through the cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cGMP) signal transduction system [5]. However, NO can also mediate its effects through stimulation of cyclooxygenase enzymes [6], altering phosphodiesterases [7], and activating Gi{alpha}1. NO can also inhibit mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase and the activation of NF-kB. In addition, NO can activate calcium-dependent potassium channels, NF-kB, and G-proteins by enhancing the rate of nucleotide exchange [8].

In the mouse, embryo development begins at the one-cell stage, using maternally derived mRNAs. When the embryo progresses to the two-cell stage, it begins to produce embryonically derived mRNAs. It has previously been reported that NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NA), a nonspecific NOS inhibitor, prevents embryos from developing beyond the two-cell stage [9]. While development was arrested, embryos did not appear to undergo cell death, as determined by visual inspection [3]. Instead, they appeared to be normal two-cell embryos. Sodium nitroprusside (SNP), a NO donor, has been shown to arrest embryo development at high concentrations [9, 10]. Thus, both an excess and a depletion of NO can inhibit embryo development.

We hypothesize that NO levels must be regulated for normal embryo development to occur and thus the mRNA of multiple NOS isoforms must be expressed in preimplantation embryos to support adequate levels of NO production. When concentrations of NO are elevated in cultures with SNP or depleted in L-NA, it is not known whether embryo development is merely arrested or if the embryos are undergoing apoptosis. We predict that excess NO will cause apoptosis of the embryo while a loss of NO will stunt development but not cause cell death. In addition, we hypothesize that NO acts through the cGMP pathway during preimplantation embryo development.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Twenty- to 25-g virgin female CD-1 mice (Charles River Laboratory, Raleigh, NC) were mated with males of the same strain to produce pregnancy. The presence of a vaginal plug indicated Day 1 of pregnancy. All tissues used for the positive controls (spleen, abdominal aorta, spinal cord) were also obtained from CD-1 females. The animal experiments reported in this study were performed in adherence with the guidelines established in the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" as adapted and promulgated by the National Institutes of Health.

Embryo Isolation

Embryos were recovered on Day 1 from oviducts, cultured in Whitten media, and harvested at the two-cell, four-cell, and morula stages. Blastocysts were collected on Day 4 from uteri (1000 h for early blastocysts; 1500 h for late blastocysts). Embryos were washed in PBS with 0.1% PVA containing 1 µM RNAse inhibitor (20 IU/µl) (RNA PCR Kit; Perkin Elmer, Branchburg, NJ) and stored at -80°C prior to use.

Embryo Culture

Following recovery from oviducts, one-cell embryos were washed with Whitten medium and then cultured for 48–72 h in either 100 µl Whitten alone or Whitten with one or more of the following: 8-Br-cGMP (from 0.1 to 40 mM), L-NA (from 125 to 500 µM), or SNP (from 0.1 to 500 µM). All cultures were placed in a humidified CO2 chamber at 37°C (95% air/5% CO2). Embryo development was assessed microscopically every 24 h and classified as two-cell, four-cell, morula, or blastocyst. The embryos were transferred to new media following each assessment.

RNA Isolation

RNA was isolated from embryos on Day 2 (two-cell), Day 3 (morula), or Day 4 (early blastocyst, 1000 h, and late blastocyst, 1500 h) of pregnancy using a Stratagene Micro RNA isolation kit (Cedar Creek, TX). Denaturing solution (guanidine isothiocynate, 4 M; sodium citrate, 0.02 M; sarcosyl, 0.5%) was added to the samples according to the manufacturer's recommendations. A fixed amount of exogenous RNA transcribed from the synthetic plasmid pAW109 (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA) was added to each sample to serve as a control for RNA recovery and reverse transcription. The pAW109 RNA includes sequences complementary to those present in the plasmid insert. The RNA was precipitated using isopropanol with glycogen as a carrier. Spinal cord, spleen, and abdominal aorta RNAs were isolated to be used as positive controls for nNOS, iNOS, and eNOS, respectively. RNA was isolated using an Ambion RNAqueous kit (Austin, TX) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Reverse Transcription

First strand complementary DNA was synthesized by priming with random hexamers. Each RNA pellet was resuspended in 8.5 µl of solution containing 1 µl of 50 µM random hexamers, 0.2 µl of 0.1 M dithiothreitol, 0.05 µl RNase inhibitor (20 IU/µl), and 7.25 µl sterile nuclease free water (RNA PCR Kit; Perkin Elmer, Branchburg, NJ). The hexamers were annealed by incubating the samples at 70°C for 6 min and then setting on ice for 1 min. Reverse transcription was performed by the addition of 4 µl of 25 mM MgCl2, 2 µl of 10x polymerase chain reaction (PCR) buffer II, 4 µl of 2mM dNTP, 1 µl of RNase inhibitor (20 IU/µl), 1.5 µl Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, and 0.5 µl of 50 µM random hexamers (RNA PCR Kit; Perkin Elmer, Branchburg, NJ). The samples were incubated at 37°C for 1 h and 95°C for 5 min and then placed on ice for 1 min. Between 20 ng and 2 µg of cDNA was used in each PCR reaction.

Real-Time PCR

PCR amplification was performed using a Light Cycler (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), a combination microvolume fluorometer, and rapid temperature cycler [11, 12]. The reaction mixture consisted of cDNA, 1 µl of 10x buffer (30 mM MgCl2), 0.5 µl of each primer (80 pg), 1 µl of 10x NTPs, 1 µl Taq DNA polymerase with TaqStart antibody (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA), and 1 µl Sybr Green I solution, diluted 1:3000 of 10 000x solution (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). A 10-µl volume was loaded into the capillary reaction vessels. For pAW109, cDNA was denatured by heating to 95°C for 1 min 20 sec. The template was amplified by 40 cycles of 0 sec at 95°C, 0 sec at 55°C, 20 sec at 72°C, and 2 sec at 85°C. For ß-actin, cDNA was denatured by heating to 96°C for 1 min 20 sec. The template was amplified by 45 cycles of 5 sec at 95°C, 20 sec at 58°C, 12 sec at 72°C, and extended at 83°C for 2 sec. For nNOS and eNOS, cDNA was denatured at 94°C for 3 min, then amplified at 94°C for 0 sec, 64°C (-0.5°C for 10 cycles) for 0 sec, and 72°C for 12 sec and then 26 cycles at 94°C for 0 sec, 58°C for 0 sec, and 72°C for 12 sec. For iNOS, cDNA was denatured at 94°C for 1 min and 30 sec, amplified for 35 cycles at 94°C for 0 sec, 55°C for 0 sec, and 72°C for 12 sec. Following amplification, all samples were melted at 94°C for 0 sec, 50°C for 30 sec, and 99°C for 0 sec, and the fluorescence was monitored. The melting curve was drawn as the negative derivative of fluorescence with respect to temperature to generate a melting point. The melting points for pAW109, ß-actin, eNOS, iNOS, and nNOS were 88, 88, 89, 88.5, and 88°C, respectively. Amplified product underwent electrophoresis on agarose/ethidium bromide gels and was visualized under UV light.

Primers

The pAW109 primers were purchased from Perkin Elmer (Foster City, CA). All primers were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) and were as follows: pAW109: gTCTCTgAATCAgAAATCCTTCTATC: CATgTCAAATTTCACTgCTTCATCC; ß-actin: TgCgTgACATCAAAgAgAAg: CggATgTCAACgTCACACTT; nNOS: TggTTCTggTCTTCgggTgTC: TACCggTTgTCATCCCTCAgC; iNOS: CCggCAAACCCAAggTC: TTgCCCCATAggAAAAgACTg; eNOS: ggAggTTCACCGTgTgCTgTg: gggCCAggCgggTCAAA.

Comet Assay

A Trevigen Comet Assay kit (Gaithersburg, MD) was used to determine whether the cultured embryos had undergone DNA fragmentation. Embryos were cultured in either Whitten or Whitten with one of the following: 500 µM L-NA, 200 µM 8-Br-cGMP, or 250 µM SNP. Following 48 h of culture, embryos were added to 75 µl low melting point agarose (42°C) and pipetted onto a slide. The slide was allowed to solidify at 4°C for 20 min, then was immersed in lysis solution (2.5 M NaCl; 100 mM EDTA, pH 10; 10 mm Tris base; 1% sodium lauryl sarcosinate; 1% Triton X-100) at 4°C for 60 min. The slide was then immersed in alkali solution (0.6 g NaOH, 250 µl 200 mM EDTA, and 49.75 ml deionized water) for 60 min. The slide was washed two times in 1x TBE buffer (108 g Tris base, 55 g boric acid, 9.3 g EDTA) for 5 min. The slide was subjected to an electric field for 10 min at 143 V followed by an ethanol wash and was then dried. Fifty microliters of diluted Sybr green (1 µl Sybr green in 10 ml TE buffer, pH 7) was placed onto each circle of dried agarose and the slide viewed by epifluorescence microscopy. To determine if the minimal tails seen in Whitten were due to the presence of RNA, RNase A (Sigma) was added to the lysis solution (1 µg/ml).

Statistical Analysis

The results of the experiments were analyzed using a chi-square analysis and a sequential Bonferroni analysis. Chi-square analysis (from 2 x 2 contingency tables) was used to test for the difference in proportions of embryos at the appropriate stage of development in either the Whitten versus L-NA, Whitten versus SNP, L-NA versus SNP and SNP/L-NA, Whitten versus 8-Br-cGMP, or L-NA versus 8-Br-cGMP/L-NA. Embryos were cultured in groups in control or experimental media. However, to confirm that culture conditions were stable, several embryos were cultured in control media every few days. Because the number of embryos isolated on each day was variable and the embryos from more than 1 day of culture were pooled as a single experiment, the numbers per group are not identical. The fewest embryos were used in those treatment groups in which all embryos were killed or there was no apparent effect on development, with a minimum of 10 embryos per group used. Statistical significance was reached with a P-value <0.05 and is represented by an asterisk.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To determine which of the three NOS isoforms are expressed in embryos at different stages of preimplantation development, embryonic mRNAs were amplified using fluorescence-monitored rapid cycle reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Amplification products were identified by melting-curve profile analysis and confirmed by gel electrophoresis. Amplification of a 308-base pair (bp) fragment of the pAW109 gene was evident in all pooled embryo samples (Fig. 1A). A 244-bp fragment of the ß-actin gene was amplified from all pooled embryo samples as well as from positive controls (Fig. 1B).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. A) The derivative melting curve product corresponding to the amplified product for pAW109 mRNA expression in mouse preimplantation embryos. The negative control (no template) is illustrated by the straight line. All preimplantation embryos (two-cell, four-cell, morula, early blastocyst, late blastocyst) showed pAW109, as illustrated by the peaks at 88°C. B) The derivative melting curve corresponding to the amplified product for ß-actin mRNA expression. The negative control (no template) is illustrated by the straight line, showing only primer dimers at 75°C. All preimplantation embryos show ß-actin expression, as illustrated by peaks at 88°C

Amplification of a 340-bp fragment of the nNOS gene was evident in all pooled embryo samples (Fig. 2A). This was also true for expression of a 300-bp fragment of the eNOS gene (Fig. 2B). Amplification of a 264-bp fragment of the iNOS gene was evident in all preimplantation embryos except early blastocysts (Fig. 2C). Melting-point curves shown are representative of three separate reactions run using pooled RNAs from embryos (n = 10 per reaction) or control RNAs (abdominal aorta, spinal cord, or spleen).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. The derivative melting curve representative of the amplified product obtained for nNOS (A), eNOS (B), and iNOS (C) mRNA expression. All preimplantation embryos show nNOS, eNOS, and iNOS mRNA expression except early blastocysts, which did not show iNOS expression

To determine if inhibition of embryo development by L-NA can be reversed by addition of NO, Day 1 embryos were cultured for 48–72 h in either Whitten media alone or Whitten with one or more of the following: L-NA, from 125 to 500 µM, or SNP, from 0.2 nM to 500 µM. Only those embryos that arrested at the two-cell stage were cultured for 72 h to determine if they were simply delayed in the development or were arrested at the two-cell stage. All embryos developed through the two-cell stage (data not shown). The inhibitory effect of L-NA was lost when its concentration was decreased to 125 µM L-NA, and all embryos developed from the two-cell stage to the four-cell stage (Fig. 3A). SNP inhibited normal embryo development past the two-cell stage at all concentrations studied (0.2 nM to 500 µM; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3B). When L-NA was combined with SNP, the inhibitory effects were reversed and a significant number of embryos continued in their development (Fig. 3C). Embryos cultured in L-NA for 48 h were rescued after transfer into Whitten medium. This rescue could not be achieved after L-NA culture for 72 h (Table 1).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. A) Preimplantation development of Day-1 embryos cultured with Whitten media (positive control) or varying concentrations of NO inhibitor (L-NA). Embryos with Whitten, n = 107; 125 µM-L-NA, n = 10; 250 µM L-NA, n = 31; 500 µM L-NA, n = 57. B)Preimplantation development of Day-1 embryos cultured with Whitten or varying concentrations of NO donor (SNP). Embryos with Whitten, n = 107; 0.2 nM SNP, n = 50; 1 nM SNP, n = 14; 100 nM SNP, n = 16; 250 µM SNP, n = 17; 500 µM SNP, n = 14. C) Preimplantation development of Day-1 embryos cultured with varying concentrations of SNP with L-NA. Embryos with 0.2 nM SNP, n = 50; 1 nM SNP, n = 14; 100 nM SNP, n = 5; 0.2 nM SNP/500 µM-L-NA, n = 34; 1 nM SNP/500 µM L-NA, n = 27; 100 nM SNP/500 µM L-NA, n = 23; 100 nM SNP/250 µM L-NA, n = 13. *Chi-square statistical analysis and sequential Bonferroni analysis were performed between embryos cultured with L-NA versus Whitten (A), SNP versus Whitten (B), SNP or SNP/L-NA versus L-NA (C), showing statistical significance, P < 0.001


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Preimplantation development of Day-1 embryos, evaluated every 24 h, cultured with Whitten medium (positive control) for 72 h or NO inhibitor (L-NA, 500 µM) for 48 or 72 h followed by 24 h of culture in Whitten medium.a

To determine whether NO affects preimplantation embryo development via a cGMP-dependent pathway, embryos were cultured up to 48–72 h in a manner similar to the cultures described above in either Whitten alone or Whitten with 8-Br-cGMP (from 1 nM to 40 mM) (Fig. 4A). Culture with both 8-Br-cGMP and 500 µM L-NA resulted in embryo development rates that were statistically significantly different from 500 µM L-NA alone (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4B).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. A) Preimplantation development of Day-1 embryos cultured with varying concentrations of 8-Br-cGMP. Embryos with 0 nM cGMP, n = 107; 1 nM 8-Br-cGMP, n = 18; 2 nM 8-Br-cGMP, n = 33; 200 nM 8-Br-cGMP, n = 27; 200 µM 8-Br-cGMP, n = 67; 40 mM 8-Br-cGMP, n = 29. B) Preimplantation development of Day-1 embryos cultured with Whitten, 500 µM L-NA, or varying concentrations of 8-Br-cGMP with 500 µM L-NA. Embryos with Whitten, n = 107; 500 µM L-NA, n = 57; 1 nM 8-Br-cGMP/500 µM L-NA, n = 24; 2 nM 8-Br-cGMP/500 µM L-NA, n = 51; 20 µM 8-Br-cGMP/500 µM L-NA, n = 19. *Chi-square statistical analysis and sequential Bonferroni analysis were performed between embryos cultured with 8-Br-cGMP versus Whitten (0 nM 8-Br-cGMP) (A) and between embryos cultured with Whitten or 8-Br-cGMP/L-NA versus L-NA alone (B), showing statistical significance, P < 0.001

To determine whether embryos that remained at the two-cell stage were dying and thus undergoing DNA fragmentation although they appeared visually normal, embryos were cultured for 48 h in either Whitten alone or Whitten with one of the following: 500 µM L-NA, 200 µM 8-Br-cGMP, or 250 µM SNP. Comet assays were run on these embryos. Embryos cultured in Whitten alone had minimal or no tails (Fig. 5A), indicating little or no DNA fragmentation. Embryos cultured in 500 µM L-NA and 200 µM 8-Br-cGMP produced tails that appeared similar in size to those cultured in Whitten and thus had little or no DNA fragmentation (Fig. 5, B and C). All embryos cultured in 250 µM SNP had long comet tails, indicating DNA fragmentation and thus cell death (Figure 5D).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Comet assay run on Day-3 embryos cultured with Whitten media (A), 500 µM L-NA (B), 200 µM 8-Br-cGMP (C), and 250 µM SNP (D). Embryos were stained with Sybr green and visualized using an epifluorescence microscope. Minimal or no tails can be seen on embryos cultured with Whitten, L-NA, and 8-Br-cGMP (AC), indicating minimal or no DNA damage. Long comet tails can be seen on embryos cultured with SNP (D), indicating the presence of DNA damage


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
These data indicate that NO is not only required for normal preimplantation embryo development but that it also must be produced within a limited range of concentrations. All stages of preimplantation embryo development had mRNA expression for the three NOS isoforms, namely nNOS, eNOS, and iNOS, with the exception of early blastocysts, which had two isoforms, i.e., nNOS and eNOS. Because multiple NOS isoforms are present in preimplantation embryos, it can be inferred that NO is required for preimplantation embryo development and thus multiple NOS isoforms are present to ensure its production.

Gouge et al. demonstrated by immunocytochemistry studies that eNOS and iNOS proteins were present in estrogen-activated blastocysts [3]. Studies on the reproductive ability of single-NOS knockout mice show that, in the absence of each NOS isoform, reproductive abnormalities exist. Such abnormalities include lower ovulatory efficiency, compromised erectile function, shorter and less variable estrous cycles, and reduced ovulation [7, 1321]. However, no abnormalities in preimplantation embryo development in single knockout mice are seen. Recent studies in our lab indicate that double knockout mice (eNOS/iNOS, eNOS/nNOS, iNOS/nNOS) are preferentially lost during development, although the stage at which embryonic loss occurs is not known (unpublished data).

Gouge et al. also previously demonstrated that, when the NOS inhibitor L-NA (500 µM) was added to culture media with two-cell embryos, development was arrested in 83% of the embryos [3]. In the present study, 100% of one-cell embryos cultured with L-NA (500 µM) were arrested at the two-cell stage. When the NO donor, SNP, was added to Day-1 mouse embryos, embryo development was also completely inhibited past the two-cell stage at concentrations above 1 nM. However, it is important to note that, while 100% of the embryos cultured in 500 µM L-NA remained at the two-cell stage throughout the 4 days of observation, almost half of the embryos cultured in excess SNP (>1 nM) began to fragment and degenerate within 24 h. This could result from the production of free radicals such as superoxide. When NO reacts with oxygen, peroxynitrites (ONOO-) are formed. These peroxynitrites convert to peroxynitrous acid, a powerful oxidant with cytotoxic effects, such as initiation of lipid peroxidation, contributing to cell toxicity [6].

Whereas L-NA (500 µM) inhibited embryo development beyond the two-cell stage, the addition of low concentrations of SNP (<=1 nM) resulted in a significant continued normal embryonic development. The addition of SNP (100 nM) at a dose that kills all the embryos when given alone resulted in a significant number of embryos continuing their normal development when added to culture media containing L-NA (500 µM). These data demonstrate that the inhibition of development produced by the lack of NO can be reversed by the addition of a NO donor and that NO production must be regulated within some specific limits. Further experiments utilizing lower concentrations of L-NA (250 µM) with SNP (100 nM) did not rescue a significant number of embryos, providing further evidence that the concentration of NO produced must be controlled within limits. Thus, excess NO leads to degeneration of embryos while insufficient amounts of NO arrests development.

In many tissues, NO can mediate its effects through the cGMP pathway [9]. Our data indicate that NO regulation of embryo development is also working, at least in part, through the cGMP pathway. L-NA inhibits the production of NO, and if NO works through the cGMP pathway, 8-Br-cGMP should be able to reverse the inhibitory effects of L-NA. Embryos cultured in 8-Br-cGMP alone showed a dose-dependent inhibition in embryo development such that, as the concentration was increased to 40 mM, the percentage of embryos developing beyond the two-cell stage decreased to zero. Embryos cultured in 8-Br-cGMP concurrently with 500 µM L-NA showed a significant increase in normal development when compared with those cultured in 500 µM L-NA alone (P < 0.05). Embryos cultured in 1 nM 8-Br-cGMP and 500 µM L-NA showed 63% progression to the four-cell stage, which was significantly greater than for 500 µM L-NA or Whitten alone (P < 0.001). These data indicate that preimplantation embryo development does involve the NO/cGMP pathway.

If, however, NO worked exclusively through the cGMP pathway, we would expect that embryos cultured in 8-Br-cGMP and L-NA would show no difference when compared with those cultured in Whitten. However, it is also possible that the chosen concentrations of 8-Br-cGMP were not optimal to reverse the effects of L-NA. Because 8-Br-cGMP could only partially rescue embryo development, we cannot exclude the possibility that NO works not only through the cGMP pathway but may also involve other pathways. These could include phosphodiesterases, cyclooxygenases, NF-kB, or G proteins, all of which have been shown in other tissues to be regulated by NO [8, 2224].

Chen et al. cultured embryos in L-NAME, SNP, 8-Br-cGMP, and/or 1H-(1,2,4)oxadiaxlol-(4,3-a)quinoxalin-1 (ODQ), a selective inhibitor of NO-sensitive soluble guanylyl cyclase [10]. Although they did not find that L-NAME (10 µM) inhibited development at the two-cell stage, they did demonstrate a decrease in development to the blastocyst stage. In their culture system, they obtained findings in agreement with our study, showing that SNP could rescue embryo development from the inhibitory effects of L-NAME. Similarly, 8-Br-cGMP could also rescue embryos from L-NAME inhibition, providing the first evidence that NO works through the cGMP pathway in preimplantation embryo development.

Chen et al. also studied whether embryos cultured in excess 8-Br-cGMP or with an 8-Br-cGMP inhibitor, ODQ, underwent apoptosis in their experiments using TUNEL and annexin V staining [10]. These researchers did not determine whether L-NAME alone or 8-Br-cGMP alone caused embryos to undergo apoptosis, even though they found that L-NAME (0.1–10 µM) caused substantial degradation. In comparison, in our study, embryos cultured in 500 µM L-NA appeared normal by visual inspection, albeit arrested in their development. Therefore, we used a comet assay to determine if embryos that appeared visually normal underwent DNA fragmentation and thus were actually undergoing cell death. All embryos cultured in Whitten, L-NA (500 µM), or excess 8-Br-cGMP (200 µM) showed minimal tails, indicating little or no DNA damage. Because 98% of embryos cultured in Whitten media progressed beyond the two-cell stage and developed to the morula stage, we expected to see no DNA damage and therefore no tails. It was possible that the minimal tails were due to RNA degradation. However, when we added Rnase in the procedure, no difference in tail size was seen (data not shown). This indicates that the small tail was not due to RNA and is due perhaps to endogenous DNA damage or damage produced during the procedure. Embryos cultured in excess SNP (250 µM) that fragmented and degenerated upon visual inspection showed sizeable tails, indicating DNA damage and thus cell death. The comet assay results from the SNP and 8-Br-cGMP cultures are in agreement with Chen et al., who found that approximately 77% of embryos cultured in SNP (10 µM) showed apoptotic cell death through annexin V staining. They also found that 8-Br-cGMP (10 µM) concentrations could not induce apoptosis alone, and our comet assay results confirm that the embryos do not have significant DNA damage [10]. These data indicate that, although increased intracellular concentrations of cGMP inhibit mitotic division in preimplantation embryos, as does excess NO, the mechanisms of altered development are not the same.

This study shows, for the first time, the presence of mRNA for all three NOS isoforms in preimplantation mouse embryos, providing further evidence for the importance of NO production in murine embryo development and potential in other mammalian embryos. We also demonstrate, through cultures of embryos in SNP, L-NA, and 8-Br-cGMP, that not only does NO require tight regulation but it also works in part through the cGMP pathway. Further, inhibition of development by lack of NO or excess cGMP does not initiate DNA damage and thus cell death, whereas excess NO does. Thus, embryonic cell death induced by excess NO does not occur through a cGMP-mediated pathway. Future experiments will study regulation of cell-cycle proteins by NO and the cGMP pathway to further our understanding of NO regulation of murine embryo development.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Correspondence. FAX: 704 687 3457; ymhuet{at}email.uncc.edu Back

Received: 11 July 2002.

First decision: 9 August 2002.

Accepted: 13 November 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Rosselli M, Keller PJ, Dubey RK. Role of nitric oxide in the biology, physiology and pathophysiology of reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 1998 4:3-24[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Huang PL, Lo EH. Genetic analysis of NOS isoforms using nNOS and eNOS knockout animals. Prog Brain Res 1998 118:13-25[Medline]
  3. Gouge RC, Marshburn P, Gordon BE, Nunley W, Huet-Hudson YM. Nitric oxide as a regulator of embryonic development. Biol Reprod 1998 58:875-879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Saxena D, Purohit SB, Kumer GP, Laloraya M. Increased appearance of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the uterus and embryo at implantation. Nitric Oxide 2000 4:384-391[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Murad F. Regulation of cytosolic guanylyl cyclase by nitric oxide: the NO-cyclic GMP signal transduction system. Adv Pharmacol 1994 26:19-33
  6. Dinerman JL, Lowenstein CJ, Snyder SH. Molecular mechanisms of nitric oxide regulation. Potential relevance to cardiovascular disease. Circ Res 1993 73:217-222[Free Full Text]
  7. Sengoku K, Takuma N, Horikawa M, Tsuchiya K, Komori H, Sharifa D, Tamate K, Ishikawa M. Requirement of nitric oxide for murine oocyte maturation, embryo development, and trophoblast outgrowth in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 2001 58:262-268[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Denninger JW, Marletta MA. Guanylate cyclase and the NO/cGMP signaling pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999 1411:334-350[Medline]
  9. Nathan C, Xie QW. Regulation of biosynthesis of nitric oxide. J Biol Chem 1994 269:13725-13728[Free Full Text]
  10. Chen HW, Jiang WS, Tzeng CR. Nitric oxide as a regulator in preimplantation embryo development and apoptosis. Fertil Steril 2001 75:1163-1171[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Steuerwald N, Cohen J, Herrera RJ, Brenner CA. Analysis of gene expression in single oocytes and embryos by real-time rapid cycle fluorescence monitored RT-PCR. Mol Hum Reprod 1999 5:1034-1039[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wittwer CT, Ririe KM, Andrew RV, David DA, Gundry RA, Balis UJ. The LightCycler: a microvolume multisample fluorometer with rapid temperature control. Biotechniques 1997 22:176-181[Medline]
  13. Huang PL. Neuronal and endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene knockout mice. Braz J Med Biol Res 1999 32:1353-1359[Medline]
  14. Mashimo H, Goyal RK. Lessons from genetically engineered animal models. IV. Nitric oxide synthase gene knockout mice. Am J Physiol 1999 277:G745-750
  15. Huang PL. Lessons learned from nitric oxide synthase knockout animals. Semin Perinatol 2000 24:87-90[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Gammie SC, Nelson RJ. Maternal aggression is reduced in neuronal nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice. J Neurosci 1999 19:8027-8035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kriegsfeld LJ, Demas GE, Huang PL, Burnett AL, Nelson RJ. Ejaculatory abnormalities in mice lacking the gene for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS-/-). Physiol Behav 1999 67:561-566[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Jablonka-Shariff A, Ravi S, Beltsos AN, Murphy LL, Olson LM. Abnormal estrous cyclicity after disruption of endothelial and inducible nitric oxide synthase in mice. Biol Reprod 1999 61:171-177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hefler LA, Reyes CA, O'Brien WE, Gregg AR. Perinatal development of endothelial nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice. Biol Reprod 2001 64:666-673[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Drazen DL, Klein SL, Burnett AL, Wallach EE, Crone JK, Huang PL, Nelson RJ. Reproductive function in female mice lacking the gene for endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Nitric Oxide 1999 3:366-374[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Tempfer C, Moreno RM, O'Brien WE, Gregg AR. Genetic contributions of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene to ovulation and menopause in a mouse model. Fertil Steril 2000 73:1025-1031[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Drapier JC, Hibbs JB Jr. Murine cytotoxic activated macrophages inhibit aconitase in tumor cells. Inhibition involves the iron-sulfur prosthetic group and is reversible. J Clin Invest 1986 78:790-797
  23. Rettori V, Belova N, Dees WL, Nyberg CL, Gimeno M, McCann SM. Role of nitric oxide in the control of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993 90:10130-10134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Draijer R, Atsma DE, van der Laarse A, van Hinsbergh VW. cGMP and nitric oxide modulate thrombin-induced endothelial permeability. Regulation via different pathways in human aortic and umbilical vein endothelial cells. Circ Res 1995 76:199-208[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A.-M. Teichert, J. A. Scott, G. B. Robb, Y.-Q. Zhou, S.-N. Zhu, M. Lem, A. Keightley, B. M. Steer, A. C. Schuh, S. L. Adamson, et al.
Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene Expression During Murine Embryogenesis: Commencement of Expression in the Embryo Occurs With the Establishment of a Unidirectional Circulatory System
Circ. Res., July 3, 2008; 103(1): 24 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. Sela-Abramovich, D. Galiani, N. Nevo, and N. Dekel
Inhibition of Rat Oocyte Maturation and Ovulation by Nitric Oxide: Mechanism of Action
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2008; 78(6): 1111 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Lapointe, M. Roy, I. St-Pierre, S. Kimmins, D. Gauvreau, L. A. MacLaren, and J.-F. Bilodeau
Hormonal and Spatial Regulation of Nitric Oxide Synthases (NOS) (Neuronal NOS, Inducible NOS, and Endothelial NOS) in the Oviducts
Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5600 - 5610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
R. C. Manser and F. D. Houghton
Ca2+-linked upregulation and mitochondrial production of nitric oxide in the mouse preimplantation embryo
J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2006; 119(10): 2048 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. Sengupta, L. Dhawan, P G L Lalitkumar, and D Ghosh
Nitric oxide in blastocyst implantation in the rhesus monkey
Reproduction, September 1, 2005; 130(3): 321 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R.C. Manser, H.J. Leese, and F.D. Houghton
Effect of Inhibiting Nitric Oxide Production on Mouse Preimplantation Embryo Development and Metabolism
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2004; 71(2): 528 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/5/1538    most recent
biolreprod.102.009282v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tranguch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Huet-Hudson, Y. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tranguch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Huet-Hudson, Y. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tranguch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Huet-Hudson, Y. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS