Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print December 11, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.012799
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/5/1793    most recent
biolreprod.102.012799v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sutovsky, P.
Right arrow Articles by Day, B. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sutovsky, P.
Right arrow Articles by Day, B. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sutovsky, P.
Right arrow Articles by Day, B. N.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 1793–1800 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.012799
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Embryo

Early Degradation of Paternal Mitochondria in Domestic Pig (Sus scrofa) Is Prevented by Selective Proteasomal Inhibitors Lactacystin and MG1321

Peter Sutovsky2,3,4, Tod C. McCauley3, Miriam Sutovsky3, and Billy N. Day3

Departments of Animal Science3 Obstetrics and Gynecology,4 University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211-5300


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis has been implicated in the recognition and selective elimination of paternal mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) after fertilization in mammals. Initial evidence suggests that this process is contributed to by lysosomal degradation of the ubiquitinated sperm mitochondrial membrane proteins. The present study examined the role of the proteasome-dependent protein degradation pathway of the ubiquitin system, as opposed to lysosomal proteolysis of the ubiquitinated proteins, in the regulation of sperm mitochondrion elimination after fertilization. Boar spermatozoa prelabeled with vital fluorescent mitochondrial probes MitoTracker were used to trace the degradation of paternal mitochondria after in vitro fertilization (IVF) of porcine oocytes. The degradation of sperm mitochondria in the cytoplasm of fertilized oocytes started very rapidly, i.e., within 12–20 h after insemination. Four stages of paternal mitochondrial degradation were distinguished, ranging from an intact mitochondrial sheath (type 1) to complete degradation (type 4). At 27–30 h postinsemination, 96% of zygotes contained the partially (type 3) or completely (type 4) degraded sperm mitochondria. Highly specific peptide inhibitors of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, lactacystin (10 and 100 µM) and MG132 (10 µM), efficiently blocked the degradation of the sperm mitochondria inside the fertilized egg when applied 6 h after insemination. Using 10 µM MG132, only 13.6% of fertilized oocytes screened 27–30 h after IVF displayed type 3 sperm mitochondria, and there was no incidence of type 4, completely degraded mitochondria. Although lactacystin is not a reversible agent, the effect of MG132 was fully reversible: zygotes transferred to regular culture medium after 24 h of culture with 10 µM MG132 resumed development and degraded sperm mitochondria within the next cell cycle. Surprisingly, penetration of the zona pellucida (ZP) was also inhibited by MG-132 and lactacystin when the inhibitors were added at insemination. Altogether, these data provide the first evidence of the participation of proteasomes in the control of mammalian mitochondrial inheritance and suggest a new role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in mammalian fertilization.

fertilization, mitochondria, mitochondrial inheritance, proteasome, sperm, ubiquitin


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ubiquitination is an ATP and conjugating enzyme-dependent process after which outlived or damaged cellular proteins and organelles are degraded by the lysosome, the proteasome, or the autophagic vacuole (reviewed in [1]). Covalent attachment of the ubiquitin molecule to the substrate's Lysine occurs via ubiquitin's C-terminal, G-76 residuum. Subsequently, poly-ubiquitin chains can be formed on one of ubiquitin's own seven Lys-residues, five of which are already proven to be able to induce poly-ubiquitin chain formation. This results in startling variability of ubiquitin-protein and ubiquitin-ubiquitin conjugation, thought to be responsible for the surprising (ubiquitin is the most conserved protein known [2]) substrate specificity of ubiquitination (reviewed by Pickart [2]). The attachment of a single ubiquitin molecule to the substrate protein (mono-ubiquitination) leads to lysosomal degradation, often coupled to an endocytotic pathway [3]. In contrast, a chain of four (tetra-ubiquitin) or more (poly-ubiquitin) molecules is necessary for protein docking to a proteasome, a multi-subunit protease [2].

The omnipresent ubiquitin system has been implicated in various steps of gametogenesis and fertilization (reviewed by Bebington et al. [4] and Sutovsky [5]), but reproductive ubiquitin research still lacks the attention it deserves. Our previous studies tied the ubiquitin system to the selective degradation of the sperm mitochondria inside the fertilized egg [68], a hypothesis providing feasible explanation for the maternal inheritance of mammalian mtDNA [9]. Initial evidence from those studies indicated the participation of the lysosomal pathway in the degradation of the ubiquitinated sperm mitochondria within the oocyte cytoplasm. Possible involvement of the proteasomal pathway of ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis was not examined in detail. The presence of proteasomal subunits in the sperm tail midpiece [10, 11], a site from which the sperm centriole is released during fertilization [6, 12], justified the suggestion that the ubiquitin-proteasome system facilitates the unmasking of the sperm centriole and sperm aster formation after mammalian fertilization [11]. Proteasomal subunits, component 2 and the zeta chain, were recognized by the antisperm antibodies in patients suffering from autoimmune fertility disorders [13]. Multiple proteasomal subunits were detected in the human [11, 14], ascidian [15, 16], and sea urchin [17] sperm acrosome. Fertilization was inhibited by anti-ubiquitin and anti-proteasome antibodies in ascidians [15] and pig (unpublished data). Finally, small peptides designed to target proteasomal activity, but not other protease activities, prevent fertilization in sea urchins [17], ascidians [16], mice [18], and pigs (this study).

Porcine in vitro fertilization (IVF; [19]) is an ideal system to study ubiquitin-dependent fertilization events. Unlike rodents, the porcine model provides an abundance of available gametes and a much larger time frame of oocyte maturation (42 h), fertilization (up to 6–8 h post-insemination), and time from fertilization to first embryonic cleavage (24–30 h). Moreover, the degradation of the sperm mitochondria inside the fertilized porcine egg occurs much faster than in the similarly convenient bovine and primate models. In the latter models, sperm mitochondria are still observed in 2–4 cell embryos [68], whereas the present study shows that the sperm mitochondrial degradation is largely accomplished prior to the first embryonic division in the pig. Taking full advantage of the porcine IVF system, the present study provides the first evidence for the role of the proteasome branch of the ubiquitin system in mammalian fertilization and mitochondrial inheritance.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Oocyte Collection

Ovaries from prepubertal gilts were collected at a local abattoir and transported at 25°C to the laboratory in 0.9% saline containing 75 µg/ml penicillin-G, 50 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate, and 25 µg/ml gentamicin sulfate. Antral follicles between 3 and 6 mm in diameter were aspirated with an 18-gauge needle and 10-ml syringe. Cumulus cell oocyte complexes (COCs) were examined under a dissecting microscope, and those with multiple layers of intact cumulus cells were selected and washed three times in HEPES-buffered Tyrode lactate (TL-HEPES) medium containing 0.1% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol.

In Vitro Maturation

Groups of 50 COCs were placed in 500 µl of serum-free modified tissue culture medium 199 (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 3.05 mM glucose, 0.91 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.57 mM cysteine, 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, 0.5 µg/ml FSH, 0.5 µg/ml LH, 0.1% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol, 75 µg/ml penicillin-G, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate [20] and matured for 22 h at 39°C and 5% CO2. COCs were washed in modified tissue culture medium 199 without FSH or LH and matured for an additional 20 h. Medium was pre-equilibrated under paraffin oil overnight at 39°C and 5% CO2. Following maturation, cumulus cells were removed by vortexing COCs in TL-HEPES medium containing 0.1% (w/v) hyaluronidase.

In Vitro Fertilization

Cumulus-free oocytes were washed three times in 500 µl of modified tris-buffered medium consisting of 113.1 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 7.5 mM CaCl2, 20 mM tris, 11 mM glucose, 5 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM caffeine, and 0.2% (w/v) BSA [20], and up to 30 oocytes were placed in 50-µl drops of modified tris-buffered medium for IVF. Cryopreserved semen was thawed in 10 ml of Dulbecco PBS (Gibco) supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) BSA, and spermatozoa were washed two times by centrifugation (1000 x g for 4 min). To determine the fertilization rate and examine the degradation of the sperm mitochondria inside the oocytes, spermatozoa were prelabeled with 200 nM of a vital, mitochondrion-specific fluorochrome (MitoTracker Green FM or CMTM Ros; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 10 min at 37°C. Labeled spermatozoa were washed and resuspended in modified tris-buffered medium, sperm concentration was determined, and spermatozoa were added to the fertilization drops to yield a final concentration of 5 x 105 spermatozoa per milliliter. Gametes were coincubated for 6 h. Following IVF, the presumptive zygotes were washed three times in NCSU23 containing 0.4% (w/v) BSA, and groups of embryos were cultured in 500 µl of NCSU23 at 39°C and 5% CO2 for up to 6 days.

Inhibitor Treatments

To examine the role of the proteasome-ubiquitin system in mitochondrial degradation and embryo development, the effect of specific inhibitors of the proteasome's proteolytic activity, MG132 (reversible inhibitor; Biomol Research Labs., Plymouth Meeting, PA) and lactacystin (irreversible inhibitor; Biomol Research Labs.), was evaluated. IVF was performed as described above with the addition of MG132 (10 µM) or lactacystin (10 or 100 µM). Controls without an inhibitor included an addition of the appropriate solvent (MG132: 100% ethanol; lactacystin: H2O) at equivalent dilutions to the in vitro culture during IVF. Presumptive zygotes were cultured up to an additional 20–24 h, at which time they were fixed and immunofluorescence analysis was performed as described below to determine the incidence of fertilization and to evaluate sperm mitochondrial degradation. Four successive stages of mitochondrial degradation (see Fig. 1) were established, and the relative rates of the oocytes expressing such respective stages were accounted for. Treatment results were compared by chi-square test and by general linear model procedures of SAS 8.02 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).



View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Rapid degradation of the sperm mitochondria inside the porcine zygote. A) Boar spermatozoon prelabeled with a vital, fixable, mitochondrion-specific probe MitoTracker CMTM Ros. B) Early stages of the sperm mitochondrion (red) degradation at 8 h postinsemination, both the male and female pronuclei display nuclear envelopes outlined by the labeling of nuclear pore complexes (NPC; green). C) Pronuclear apposition at 12 h post-insemination (green = NPC). D) Sperm axoneme with the intact outer dense fibers (ODF; red), but no sperm mitochondria, are seen in the zygotic cytoplasm at 20 h postinsemination. E) The typical, "snake tongue" pattern (red and insert) of ODF in a two-cell embryo at 30 h postinsemination. F) Sperm mitochondrion degradation (red) in a pseudo-cleaving, polyspermic zygote. G) Di-spermic zygote, fertilized with the spermatozoa differentially labeled with green and red MitoTracker probes at 0 h (green spermatozoa) and 3 h (red spermatozoa) insemination time points. Note that the delay in the degradation of the red sperm mitochondria reflects the time difference in insemination. HK) Representative images of the patterns of mitochondrial degradation seen inside the 1–2 cell embryos ranging from the straight, rod-shaped mitochondrial sheath (type 1) to the complete degradation leaving behind the mitochondrion-less ODF (type 4); (H) is superimposed on a DIC image of male and female pronuclei with prominent nucleolus precursor bodies (NPB). NPBs in (I) and (J) are counterstained with anti-ubiquitin antibody Ab1690. DNA (blue) in all images is counterstained with DAPI

Transient Proteasome Inhibition

To examine if the degradation of sperm mitochondria after fertilization was dependent on the stage of embryonic development or embryo age (i.e., if there was a window of opportunity for the degradation of sperm mitochondria) and if inhibition of mitochondrial degradation was reversible, oocytes were fertilized in control medium, cultured in the presence of 10 µM MG132 for 18 h, recovered, and placed into inhibitor-free medium for an additional 96 h. In addition to transient exposure, some embryos were exposed to MG132 during the entire culture period and others were cultured without inhibitor. At the end of culture, embryos were fixed and mitochondrial degradation was analyzed as described below. Controls without inhibitor included the addition of the appropriate solvents to the inhibitors during embryo culture, at equivalent dilutions. Treatment results were compared by chi-square test and by general linear model procedures of SAS 8.02 (SAS Institute).

Immunofluorescence

Oocytes/embryos were fixed at indicated time points between 0 and 120 h after insemination with MitoTracker-labeled (MT CMTM Ros, unless indicated otherwise, Molecular Probes, Inc.) spermatozoa. Zona pellucida (ZP) was removed by a short incubation in TL-HEPES with 0.5% pronase (Protease; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Oocytes were transferred into the first well of a nine-well Pyrex brand glass plate (Fischer Scientific, Brightwaters, NY) filled with 400 µl of 37°C warm PBS, and 100 µl of 10% formaldehyde was slowly added to bring the final concentration of formaldehyde to 2%. After 40 min fixation at room temperature, oocytes were washed in two wells of PBS, fixative was removed, and plates were wrapped in Handi-wrap plastic wrap (Fischer Scientific) and stored for 1–7 days in the dark at 4°C. Prior to immunofluorescence processing, oocytes were permeabilized in PBS with 0.1% Triton-X-100 for 40 min at RT and blocked for 25 min in 0.1 M PBS containing 5% normal goat serum and 0.1% Triton-X-100. Primary antibody incubation was performed for 40 min with rabbit anti-ubiquitin Ab 1690 (dilution 1/100; Chemicon Inc., Temecula, CA), known to cross-react with nuclear/nucleolar ubiquitin tail proteins [21], or mouse IgG mAb 414 against nuclear pore complex (dilution 1/200; BabCo/Covance, Berkeley, CA). After a wash, samples were incubated for 40 min with appropriate secondary antibodies, including goat anti-mouse IgG-FITC and goat anti-rabbit FITC (all 1/80; both from Zymed, Inc., San Francisco, CA). DNA stain DAPI was added at 2.5 µg/ml to second antibody solution. Negative controls (data not shown) were performed by first antibody omission (mAb 414) or by the incubation with preimmune rabbit serum in place of the first antibody (Ab 1690). Samples were mounted on microscopy slides in VectaShield mounting medium (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA) and sealed with clear nail polish. Image acquisition was performed by a Nikon Eclipse 800 microscope (Nikon Instruments, Inc., Melville, NY) with CoolSnap camera (Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ) and MetapMorh software (Universal Imaging Corp., Downington, PA). Data were archived on CD-R compact disks, edited using Adobe Photoshop 5.5 (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA), and printed on an Epson Stylus 1280 photo printer (Epson America, Inc., Long Beach, CA).

Electron Microscopy

Oocytes were fixed at 20 h post-insemination in 2% paraformaldehyde and 0.6% glutaraldehyde in cacodylate buffer, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated by an ascending ethanol series (30%–100%), and embedded in PolyBed 812 resin. Ultrathin sections were prepared on a Leica (Heidelberg, Germany) Ultracut UCT ultramicrotome, placed on 100 MESH copper grids, and stained in two steps with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Serial sections of 10 oocytes were examined and photographed in a Jeol 1200 EX electron microscope. Negatives were scanned by a Umax Magic Scan flatbed scanner, recorded on a CD-R disk, and printed on an Epson Stylus 1280 photo printer using Adobe Photoshop 5.5 software.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Degradation of the Paternal, Sperm Mitochondria in Porcine Zygote Occurs Prior to First Mitotic Division

To study sperm mitochondrial degradation after fertilization, boar spermatozoa were prelabeled with a vital, fixable, mitochondrion-specific probe MitoTracker CMTM Ros (Fig. 1A) and used for IVF. Resulting zygotes were processed for immunofluorescence with the blue fluorescent DNA stain DAPI and antibodies against nuclear ubiquitin-tail proteins (Ab1690 [21]) and nuclear pore complexes (mAb 414 [22]) included for evaluating pronuclear development. Signs of sperm mitochondrial degradation were seen in some zygotes as early as 8 h after insemination, at which stage the male and female pronuclei appeared and the nuclear envelopes were reconstituted on them (Fig. 1B). Pronuclear apposition and progressive early stages of sperm mitochondrial degradation were observed at 12 h post-insemination (Fig. 1C). Complete removal of the sperm mitochondria, leaving behind the "naked" sperm axoneme with redundant outer dense fibers (ODF), was seen in some zygotes as early as 20 h post-insemination (Fig. 1D). The typical, "snake tongue" pattern resulting from the uptake of MitoTracker by sperm ODF was also seen in some of the two-cell embryos, emerging at 24–30 h post-insemination (Fig. 1E). Although it was possible to locate the remnants of ODF and the sperm-derived centriole/zygotic centrosome inside the zygotes at 20 h post-insemination (Fig. 2, A and C), there were no signs of the typical, oval sperm mitochondria that are morphologically distinct from the round-shaped oocyte mitochondria (Fig. 2, A and D). Sperm mitochondrial degradation was also observed in the pseudo-cleaving, polyspermic eggs (Fig. 1F). Interestingly, when the spermatozoa, differentially labeled with green and red fluorescent MitoTracker probes (Fig. 1G), were used for IVF at the 0 and 3 h insemination time points, the delay in the degradation of "red" sperm mitochondria seemed to mirror the time difference in insemination.



View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Absence of the sperm mitochondria, confirmed by electron microscopic examination of the fertilized porcine oocytes at 20 h post-insemination. A) Male pronucleus (MPN) with the remnants of the associated sperm tail outer dense fiber (arrows). Arrowheads point to the oocyte mitochondria. B, C) Serial section of the same part shown in (A), showing details of the sperm-derived proximal centriole (single arrowhead in B) and a daughter centriole (double arrowhead in B) formed after the sperm centriole was transformed into an active zygotic centrosome inside this oocyte's cytoplasm. Sperm mitochondria were not found in the vicinity of the remnants of ODF (arrows in B). Abundant microtubules (arrows in C) indicate that this zygotic centrosome was engaged in the nucleation of the sperm aster. Ten oocytes were serial sectioned for this examination. D) Boar spermatozoon on the surface of zona pellucida (ZP) 20 h postinsemination. Note the typical shape and small size of sperm mitochondria (insert), clearly distinguishable from those of an oocyte. Arrow denotes the position of the proximal centriole in the sperm tail connecting piece. E) Acrosome exocytosis after boar sperm-zona binding in the presence of proteasomal inhibitor MG132

Based on the above observations of rapid sperm mitochondrial degradation in porcine zygotes, the patterns of mitochondrial degradation seen inside the 1–2 cell embryos were divided into four stages/categories (Fig. 1, H–K). Type 1 represented a straight, rod-shaped mitochondrial sheath with little or no dents suggesting the removal of few sperm mitochondria. Type 2 was characterized by the recognizable mitochondrial sheath, with numerous missing mitochondria and a distorted, sometimes corkscrew-like shape. Type 3 sperm mitochondria were clumped or scattered around the remnants of axonemal ODF, which take up the MitoTracker dyes in a nonspecific manner. Type 4 represented the absence of detectable sperm mitochondria and often a typical pattern of split proximal ends of outer dense fibers (snake tongue; see also Fig. 1E).

Quantitative analysis revealed that at 27–30 h postinsemination, a vast majority (96%) of zygotes contained the partially or completely degraded types 3 and 4 sperm mitochondria (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Degradation of the sperm mitochondria in pig oocytes examined 27–30 h after insemination with or without proteasome-specific inhibitors

Proteasomal Inhibitors Prevent the Degradation of the Sperm Mitochondria Inside the Fertilized Egg in a Reversible Fashion

To determine whether the degradation of the sperm mitochondria depends on the activity of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, oocytes were treated with 10 µM MG132, 10 µM lactacystin, or 100 µM lactacystin at insemination. Both inhibitors are small molecules that bind to the catalytic subunit of the proteasome and block its proteolytic activity specifically without affecting other, non-proteasomal protease activities [23]. Surprisingly, both treatments inhibited fertilization, and in the case of MG132, to a 100% effect (Table 1). This block was not due to changes in sperm motility, sperm-zona binding, or acrosome reaction (see Fig. 2E), as the inhibitors had no effect on the fertilization rates in zona free oocytes (see Discussion). This effect of proteasomal inhibitors on zona penetration required a change of treatment protocol in which the oocytes were treated with the above inhibitors 6 h post-insemination, a time sufficient for sperm penetration in approximately 71% of oocytes (comparable to an 80% fertilization rate in control oocytes). MG132 was used in most of these studies, as it is a more potent inhibitor of proteasomal activity than lactacystin, and in contrast to lactacystin is fully reversible (reviewed by Goldberg et al. [24]). Such treatment effectively blocked the degradation of the sperm mitochondria, wherein 86% of the treated oocytes contained type 1 or type 2 sperm mitochondria (Fig. 3, A–C). In a recovery experiment, oocytes were treated with 10 µM MG132 6 h postinsemination, the inhibitor was washed out 24 h after insemination (i.e., 18 h after the addition of MG132), and oocytes were allowed to develop for another 96 h. In parallel, one group of oocytes were left in the medium with MG132 for the duration of the trial (120 h) and the control, untreated oocytes were inseminated and cultured for the same amount of time. All oocytes cultured in the presence of MG132 for the entire culture period (120 h) remained in the one-cell stage (Table 2; Fig. 3, D–F) because of a known effect of the inhibition of cell cycle progression via the inhibition of ubiquitin- and proteasome-dependent cyclin degradation (reviewed in [1]). Invariably, the treated zygotes contained more or less intact type 1 or type 2 sperm mitochondria (Fig. 3F). In contrast, those oocytes that were washed from MG132 after 24 h showed a 53% cleavage rate comparable with 63% cleavage rates in the nonexposed control (Table 2). In none of the cleaved embryos were the sperm mitochondria detected (Fig. 3D), suggesting that the removal of MG132 not only allowed the progression of the embryonic cell cycle, but also the completion of the sperm mitochondrial degradation. Consistent with the 24-h shortened time for which the MG132 oocytes were allowed to develop, morulae were observed in this group at the time when some of the control, untreated embryos reached the blastocyst stage.



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Inhibition of the sperm mitochondrial degradation by selective proteasomal inhibitors, lactacystin and MG132. A), B) Intact sperm mitochondrial sheath (red; arrow) inside an oocyte treated for 18 h with 10 µM MG132 (A; applied 6 h post-insemination) or 10 µM lactacystin (B; applied at fertilization). C) Control oocyte contains only the clumped remnants of the sperm mitochondrial sheath (red; arrow). Both inhibitors are small molecules that bind to the catalytic subunit of the proteasome and block its proteolytic activity specifically without affecting other, non-proteasomal protease activities. D) Four-cell embryo at Day 5, 120 h post-insemination in the group treated for 24 h with MG132 to demonstrate its reversibility: following the removal of MG132, sperm mitochondria were degraded and the zygote resumed cleavage (other zygotes from the same group reached morula stage by Day 5). E) Untreated, control zygote reaching early blastocyst stage at Day 5. F) Treatment control, cultured for 5 d in medium with 10 µM MG132. DNA was counterstained with DAPI


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Embryo recovery and development after MG132 treatment


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The paradigm of strictly maternal inheritance of mtDNA [25, 26] has been challenged recently by population studies in humans [27, 28] and chimpanzees [29]. Based on published sequences of the hyper-variable region of mitochondrial genome, the D-loop, such studies proposed that a recombination event between paternal and maternal mtDNA occurred in these respective lineages. However, some of the claims were subsequently retracted due to apparent sequencing errors [30], and recent mitochondrial genome-wide surveys in humans did not find any evidence of recombination based on linkage disequilibrium [31, 32]. Such studies are further complicated by the presence of mitochondrial pseudo-genes in the nuclear genome, which may be a source of false-positive results (reviewed by Cummins [33]).

An alternative hypothesis, based on the meeting reports of paternal mtDNA presence in the human placenta, suggests that the sperm mtDNA could escape degradation after fertilization and ultimately drift toward extra-embryonic tissues. Although such an intriguing hypothesis warrants detailed examination [34], it must be supported by a detailed, peer-reviewed report to win acceptance. In addition, the seeming mtDNA recombination in the placenta and other tissues may be due to the ongoing intra-organelle mtDNA repair [35], rather than recombination of maternal and paternal mtDNA. The first credible case of human paternal mitochondrial inheritance was reported in a recent case study [36], yet no evidence of paternal-maternal mtDNA recombination was found. Sadly for the subject, although intriguing for a scholar studying mitochondrial inheritance, this paternal transmission was observed in a case of severe mitochondrial myopathy accompanied by a de novo 2-base pair (bp) deletion of the mitochondrial ND2 gene, which was carried by the patient but not by his father.

Although further studies on possible recombination between maternal and paternal mtDNA are warranted, more attention should be paid to cell biology of the sperm mitochondrial degradation after fertilization. Due to abundant ultrastructural [6, 37, 38] and genetic [39, 40] evidence of sperm mitochondrion degradation inside the zygotic cytoplasm, it is less likely that mtDNA would be liberated from the degraded organelles. If a recombination event was to occur, it would most likely be mediated by the fusion of intact maternal and paternal mitochondria. At present, we cannot rule out that at least some sperm mitochondria could escape proteolytic degradation. However, this is a fairly unlikely scenario considering the presence of the proteolytic signal, ubiquitin, in the sperm mitochondrial membrane [7, 8] and the evidence implicating both lysosomes [8] and proteasomes (this study) in the degradation of sperm mitochondria inside the zygotic cytoplasm. In our previous studies using the bovine model, we were able to delay sperm mitochondrial degradation by a general lysosomal inhibitor, ammonium chloride [8]. This was also attempted in the course of our present studies (data not shown). Although we noticed some delay in the degradation of the fertilizing spermatozoon's mitochondria, the treatments seemed to block embryonic development irreversibly and eventually caused embryonic death (data not shown). On the other hand, treatment with MG132, a specific proteasomal inhibitor, prevented degradation of the sperm mitochondrial reversibly and without affecting the rates of embryonic development. Figure 3D shows a four-cell embryo on Day 5 after a 24-h exposure to MG132, a treatment applied on Day 1 of the IVF cycle. Although this embryo did not develop into a morula or a blastocyst as other MG132-treated embryos did after reversal of this treatment, it serves as a good example of the full reversibility of MG132 treatment and shows that the MG132-treated embryos resumed the degradation of the paternal mitochondria immediately after the removal of blocking peptide. Such a result favors a role of the proteasome pathway over lysosomal degradation in the proteolysis of sperm mitochondria after fertilization. However, it is possible that lysosomal inhibitors more specific than ammonium chloride would have yielded better results, i.e., a more efficient block of sperm mitochondrion degradation in our porcine studies. Interspecies differences should also be considered, implying that different routes of sperm mitochondrial degradation could be employed by the porcine (this study) and bovine [8] zygotes. The degradation of the paternal mitochondria is species-specific and because of unknown incompatibilities does not occur in the mouse interspecies crosses [7, 39, 40]. A possible contribution from a 15-lipoxygenase pathway for the degradation of the lipid components of the mitochondrial membrane, known to intersect with ubiquitin-dependent organelle/mitochondrial degradation during reticulocyte differentiation [41, 42], is under examination.

In addition to supporting the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in the sperm mitochondrial degradation, the purpose of MG132 recovery experiments was to examine whether there is a window of opportunity for the targeting and removal of paternal mitochondria during the early stages of zygotic development. Should that be the case, concern could arise that when the plasma membrane-intact human or animal spermatozoa are injected directly in the egg cytoplasm by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), the presence of the plasma membrane, normally removed during sperm-oolemma fusion, could delay the degradation of the sperm mitochondria and result in heteroplasmy caused by the carryover of paternal mtDNA from the injected sperm. Present results in the pig do not justify such a concern and neither do the few existing studies of mtDNA inheritance in ICSI babies (reviewed in [5, 33, 43]). Further studies in other mammalian species and a wide-scale screening of ICSI children may still be warranted to completely rule out such a possibility.

The finding of this study that the proteasomal inhibitors prevent the penetration of zona pellucida by the fertilizing boar spermatozoa deserves further attention. Although this may sound sensational at first, there are at least three lines of evidence supporting the role of sperm proteasomes in animal fertilization, acrosome reaction, and zona penetration. First, proteasomal subunits can be detected in the acrosome of human [14] and boar (unpublished data) spermatozoa. Second, sequential ubiquitination and acrosomal-proteasomal degradation of the putative sperm receptor protein HrVC70, the ascidian homologue of mouse ZP3-sperm receptor, has been shown on the ascidian vitelline envelope, an analogue of mammalian ZP [16]. Similarly, ubiquitin immunoreactive proteins can be detected on the outer face of the pig ZP (unpublished data). Third, zona penetration can be blocked by proteasomal inhibitors in mouse [18], pig (this study), and invertebrate [15, 17] oocytes, and by anti-proteasome antibodies in pig (unpublished data). It should also be considered that the knockouts of several acrosomal proteins with predicted enzymatic, zona-digesting activity did not yield the targeted animals infertile, and it is still not known which acrosomal component digests the ZP after acrosomal exocytosis [44, 45]. It is very important to emphasize that the proteasomal inhibitors used in this study did not directly affect the viability of either spermatozoa or oocytes during and after IFV. Zona-free oocytes fertilized in the presence of lactacystin or MG132 invariably showed high levels of polyspermic fertilization (data not shown). In zona-intact oocytes, the reversibility of MG132 treatment (lactacystin is known to be irreversible) and embryo viability have been demonstrated (Table 2).

Detailed discussion of the proteasomal involvement in acrosomal exocytosis and zona penetration is beyond the focus of the present study. It appears that the sperm-ZP interactions involve sperm proteasomes present in the acrosomal matrix, and an ubiquitin-immunoreactive substrate presents exclusively on the outer face of the ZP. Further effort is being focused on the characterization of individual proteasomal subunits present in the porcine acrosome and on the isolation and sequencing of the ubiquitin immunoreactive substrates in the outer layer of pig ZP.

Taken together, the present studies provide the first evidence for the role of proteasomal degradation of ubiquitinated proteins in the control of mammalian mitochondrial inheritance. At the same time a new role for the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is invoked in the process of zona penetration by the fertilizing spermatozoon.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Angela George for clerical assistance, and Randy Tindall and Cheryl Jensen for the preparation of electron microscopy specimens.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by USDA New Investigator Award 99-35203-11743 and USDA award 2002-02069 to P.S., who is also supported by NIH/NIOSH and Food for the 21st Century Program of the University of Missouri—Columbia. B.N.D. and T.M. are supported in part by the collaborative animal research program Development of Biotechnology Tools for Improved Genetic and Reproductive Performance in Swine between the University of Missouri Department of Animal Sciences and Monsanto Animal Agriculture Group. Back

2 Correspondence: Peter Sutovsky, University of Missouri-Columbia, S141 ASRC, 920 East Campus Drive, Columbia, MO 65211-5300. FAX: 573 884 5540; sutovskyp{at}missouri.edu Back

Received: 29 October 2002.

First decision: 14 November 2002.

Accepted: 5 December 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem 1998 67:425-479[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Pickart CM. Polyubiquitin chains. In: Peters JM, Harris JR, Finley D (eds.), Ubiquitin and the Biology of the Cell. New York: Plenum Press; 1998: 19–63
  3. Strous GJ, Govers R. The ubiquitin-proteasome system and endocytosis. J Cell Sci 1999 112:1417-1423[Abstract]
  4. Bebington C, Doherty FJ, Fleming SD. The possible biological and reproductive functions of ubiquitin. Hum Reprod Update 2001 7:102-111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Sutovsky P. Ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis in mammalian spermatogenesis, fertilization, and sperm quality control: killing three birds with one stone. Micros Res Tech 2003; in press.
  6. Sutovsky P, Navara CS, Schatten G. The fate of the sperm mitochondria and the incorporation, conversion and disassembly of the sperm tail structures during bovine fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod 1996 55:1195-1205[Abstract]
  7. Sutovsky P, Moreno R, Ramalho-Santos J, Dominko T, Simerly C, Schatten G. Ubiquitin tag for sperm mitochondria. Nature 1999 402:371-372[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Sutovsky P, Moreno R, Ramalho-Santos J, Dominko T, Simerly C, Schatten G. Ubiquitinated sperm mitochondria, selective proteolysis and the regulation of mitochondrial inheritance in mammalian embryos. Biol Reprod 2000 63:582-590[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Scheffler IE. A century of mitochondrial research: achievements and perspectives. Mitochondrion 2001 1:3-31[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Mochida K, Tres LL, Kierszenbaum AL. Structural features of the 26S proteasome complex isolated from rat testis and sperm tail. Mol Reprod Dev 2000 57:176-184[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Wojcik C, Benchaib M, Lornage J, Czyba JC, Guerin JF. Proteasomes in human spermatozoa. Int J Androl 2000 23:169-177[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Sutovsky P, Schatten G. Depletion of glutathione during oocyte maturation reversibly blocks the decondensation of the male pronucleus and pronuclear apposition during fertilization. Biol Reprod 1997 56:1503-1512[Abstract]
  13. Bohring C, Krause E, Habermann B, Krause W. Isolation and identification of sperm membrane antigens recognized by antisperm antibodies, and their possible role in immunological infertility disease. Mol Hum Reprod 2001 7:113-118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Bialy LP, Ziemba HT, Marianowski P, Fracki S, Bury M, Wojcik C. Localization of a proteasomal antigen in human spermatozoa: immunohistochemical electron microscopic study. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2001 39:129-130
  15. Sawada H, Takahashi Y, Fujino J, Flores SY, Yokosawa H. Localization and roles in fertilization of sperm proteasomes in the ascidian Halocynthiaroretzi. Mol Reprod Dev 2002 62:271-276[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Sawada H, Sakai N, Abe Y, Tanaka E, Takahashi Y, Fujino J, Kodama E, Takizawa S, Yokosawa H. Extracellular ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated degradation of the ascidian sperm receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002 99:1223-1228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Matsumura K, Aketa K. Proteasome (multicatalytic proteinase) of sea urchin sperm and its possible participation in the acrosome reaction. Mol Reprod Dev 1991 29:189-199.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Wang HM, Song CC, Duan CW, Shi WX, Li CX, Chen DY, Wang YC. Effects of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway on mouse sperm capacitation, acrosome reaction and in vitro fertilization. Chin Sci Bull 2002 47:127-132
  19. Day BN. Reproductive biotechnologies: current status in porcine reproduction. Anim Reprod Sci 2000 60–61:161-172
  20. Abeydeera LR, Day BN. Fertilization and subsequent development in vitro of pig oocytes inseminated in a modified tris-buffered medium with frozen-thawed ejaculated spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1997 57:729-734[Abstract]
  21. McCauley T, Sutovsky M, van Leyen K, Lai L, Day BN, Prather RS, Oko R, Sutovsky P. Unique aspects of zygotic development in pig after in vitro fertilization and cloning. Biol Reprod 2002 66:suppl 1311
  22. Sutovsky P, Simerly C, Hewitson L, Schatten G. Assembly of nuclear pore complexes and annulate lamellae promotes normal pronuclear development in fertilized mammalian oocytes. J Cell Sci 1998 111:2841-2854[Abstract]
  23. Lee DH, Goldberg AL. Proteasome inhibitors: valuable new tools for cell biologists. Trends Cell Biol 1998 8:397-403[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Goldberg AL, Stein R, Adams J. New insights into proteasome function: from Archaebacteria to drug development. Chem Biol 1995 2:503-508[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Hutchinson CA, Newbold JE, Potter SS. Maternal inheritance of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Nature 1974 251:536-538[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Giles RE, Blanc H, Cann HM, Wallace DC. Maternal inheritance of human mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1980 77:6715-6719[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Eyre-Walker A, Smith NH, Smith JM. How clonal are human mitochondria?. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1999 266:477-483[Medline]
  28. Hagelberg E, Goldman N, Lio P, Whelan S, Schiefenhovel W, Clegg JB, Bowden DK. Evidence for mitochondrial DNA recombination in a human population of island Melanesia. R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1999 266:485-492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Awadalla P, Eyre-Walker A, Smith JM. Linkage disequilibrium and recombination in hominid mitochondrial DNA. Science 1999 286:2524-2525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hagelberg E, Goldman N, Lio P, Whelan S, Schiefenhovel W, Clegg JB, Bowden DK. Evidence for mitochondrial DNA recombination in a human population of island Melanesia: correction. R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1999 267:1595-1596
  31. Ingman M, Kaessmann H, Paabo S, Gyllensten U. Mitochondrial genome variation and the origin of modern humans. Nature 2000 408:708-713[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Herrnstadt C, Elson JL, Fahy E, Preston G, Turnbull DM, Anderson C, Ghosh SS, Olefsky JM, Beal MF, Davis RE, Howell N. Reduced-median-network analysis of complete mitochondrial DNA coding-region sequences for the major African, Asian, and European haplogroups. Am J Hum Genet 2002 70:1152-1171[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Cummins J. Mitochondrial DNA and the Y chromosome: parallels and paradoxes. Reprod Fert Develop 2001 13:533-542[CrossRef]
  34. St John JC. The transmission of mitochondrial DNA following assisted reproductive techniques. Theriogenology 2002 57:109-123[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Kajander OA, Karhunen PJ, Holt IJ, Jacobs HT. Prominent mitochondrial DNA recombination intermediates in human heart muscle. EMBO Rep 2001 2:1007-1012[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Schwartz M, Vissing J. Paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA. N Engl J Med 2002 22:576-580
  37. Hiraoka J, Hirao Y. Fate of sperm tail components after incorporation into the hamster egg. Gamete Res 1988 19:369-380[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Szollosi D. The fate of sperm middle-piece mitochondria in the rat egg. J Exp Zool 1965 159:367-377[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Kaneda H, Hayashi JI, Takahama S, Taya C, Fischer-Lindahl K, Yonekawa H. Elimination of paternal mitochondrial DNA in intraspecific crosses during early mouse embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995 92:4542-4546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Shitara H, Hayashi JI, Takahama S, Kaneda H, Yonekawa H. Maternal inheritance of mouse mtDNA in interspecific hybrids: segregation of the leaked paternal mtDNA followed by the prevention of subsequent paternal leakage. Genetics 1998 148:851-857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Rapoport S, Dubiel W, Muller M. Proteolysis of mitochondria in reticulocytes during maturation is ubiquitin-dependent and is accompanied by a high rate of ATP hydrolysis. FEBS Lett 1985 180:249-252[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. van Leyen K, Duvoisin RM, Engelhardt H, Wiedmann M. A function for lipoxygenase in programmed organelle degradation. Nature 1998 395:392-395[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Marchington DR, Scott Brown MS, Lamb VK, Van Golde RJ, Kremer JA, Tuerlings JH, Mariman EC, Balen AH, Poulton J. No evidence for paternal mtDNA transmission to offspring or extra-embryonic tissues after ICSI. Mol Hum Reprod 2002 8:1046-1049[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Primakoff P, Myles DG. Penetration, adhesion, and fusion in mammalian sperm-egg interaction. Science 2002 296:2183-2185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Gerton G. Function of the sperm acrosome. In: Hardy D (ed.), Fertilization. San Diego: Academic Press; 2002: 265–302



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
X. Yu, S. Hong, and E. M. Faustman
Cadmium-induced Activation of Stress Signaling Pathways, Disruption of Ubiquitin-dependent Protein Degradation and Apoptosis in Primary Rat Sertoli Cell-Gonocyte Cocultures
Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2008; 104(2): 385 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Y. Rawe, E. S. Diaz, R. Abdelmassih, C. Wojcik, P. Morales, P. Sutovsky, and H. E. Chemes
The role of sperm proteasomes during sperm aster formation and early zygote development: implications for fertilization failure in humans
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 573 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. J. Zandy and S. Bassnett
Proteolytic Mechanisms Underlying Mitochondrial Degradation in the Ocular Lens
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 293 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
S. Sekiguchi, J. Kwon, E. Yoshida, H. Hamasaki, S. Ichinose, M. Hideshima, M. Kuraoka, A. Takahashi, Y. Ishii, S. Kyuwa, et al.
Localization of Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase L1 in Mouse Ova and Its Function in the Plasma Membrane to Block Polyspermy
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2006; 169(5): 1722 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
G Manandhar, D Feng, Y-J Yi, L Lai, J Letko, J Laurincik, M Sutovsky, J L Salisbury, R S Prather, H Schatten, et al.
Centrosomal protein centrin is not detectable during early pre-implantation development but reappears during late blastocyst stage in porcine embryos.
Reproduction, September 1, 2006; 132(3): 423 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. C. Logan
The mitochondrial compartment
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2006; 57(6): 1225 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Ozanon, J. Chouteau, and P. Sutovsky
Clinical adaptation of the sperm ubuquitin tag immunoassay (SUTI): relationship of sperm ubiquitylation with sperm quality in gradient-purified semen samples from 93 men from a general infertility clinic population
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2271 - 2278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P. Sutovsky, G. Manandhar, J. Laurincik, J. Letko, J. N. Caamano, B. N Day, L. Lai, R. S Prather, K. L Sharpe-Timms, R. Zimmer, et al.
Expression and proteasomal degradation of the major vault protein (MVP) in mammalian oocytes and zygotes
Reproduction, March 1, 2005; 129(3): 269 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Sutovsky, G. Manandhar, T. C. McCauley, J. N. Caamano, M. Sutovsky, W. E. Thompson, and B. N. Day
Proteasomal Interference Prevents Zona Pellucida Penetration and Fertilization in Mammals
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2004; 71(5): 1625 - 1637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
L.-J. Huo, H.-Y. Fan, C.-G. Liang, L.-Z. Yu, Z.-S. Zhong, D.-Y. Chen, and Q.-Y. Sun
Regulation of Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway on Pig Oocyte Meiotic Maturation and Fertilization
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2004; 71(3): 853 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
W. E. Thompson, E. Asselin, A. Branch, J. K. Stiles, P. Sutovsky, L. Lai, G.-S. Im, R. S. Prather, S. C. Isom, E. Rucker III, et al.
Regulation of Prohibitin Expression During Follicular Development and Atresia in the Mammalian Ovary
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 282 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/5/1793    most recent
biolreprod.102.012799v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sutovsky, P.
Right arrow Articles by Day, B. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sutovsky, P.
Right arrow Articles by Day, B. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sutovsky, P.
Right arrow Articles by Day, B. N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS