Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 5, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.013540
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/6/2322    most recent
biolreprod.102.013540v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goyeneche, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Telleria, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goyeneche, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Telleria, C. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Goyeneche, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Telleria, C. M.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 2322–2330 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.013540
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Ovary

In Vivo Hormonal Environment Leads to Differential Susceptibility of the Corpus Luteum to Apoptosis In Vitro1

Alicia A. Goyeneche3, Ivana L. Martinez4, Ricardo P. Deis4, Geula Gibori5, and Carlos M. Telleria2,3

Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences,3 University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069 Laboratory of Reproduction and Lactation,4 IMBECU-CONICET, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina Department of Physiology and Biophysics,5 University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60612


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We evaluated the involvement of the in vivo hormonal environment on the ability of the rat corpus luteum (CL) to undergo apoptosis. Gel electrophoretic DNA fragmentation analysis revealed no apoptosis in CL isolated either the 2 last days of pregnancy (Days 21 and 22) or throughout the 4 days following parturition, suggesting that the number of cells undergoing apoptosis at the same time is not sufficient to allow for visualization of DNA breakdown. In contrast, CL incubated in serum-free medium underwent significant apoptosis, as evaluated by chromatin condensation and DNA fragmentation, regardless of their developmental stage in pregnancy. However, CL obtained on Day 7 of pregnancy and on Day 4 postpartum demonstrated higher sensitivity to apoptosis in vitro, but lactation reduced significantly the capacity of the CL to undergo apoptosis when maintained in culture. These data suggest that the exposure of the CL to different hormonal environments throughout pregnancy and after parturition is responsible for the differential susceptibility to apoptosis observed in vitro. We have previously shown that progesterone is a direct factor for survival of the CL. Prolactin stimulates luteal progesterone production; therefore, we examined whether prolactin prevents apoptosis in luteal cells independently of its stimulatory action on progesterone production. We used a luteal cell line (GG-CL) that expresses the prolactin receptor but does not produce progesterone. These cells undergo apoptosis under conditions of serum starvation, and addition of prolactin to the culture medium significantly reduced DNA fragmentation. These results indicate that the extent of luteal cell death induced by incubation of CL under serum-free conditions depends on the hormonal environment to which this endocrine gland is exposed in vivo. These results also indicate an important role for lactation in preventing apoptosis, which is further supported by the antiapoptotic activity of prolactin observed in luteal cells.

apoptosis, corpus luteum, lactation, ovary, prolactin receptor


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Luteolysis and luteal regression are terms used to describe the process that occurs at the end of the life span of the corpus luteum (CL). This process encompasses both a decline in the progesterone-producing capacity of the gland, also known as functional luteal regression, and its morphological involution, known as structural luteal regression. The morphological changes that occur after the CL discontinues the production of progesterone are associated with programmed cell death (apoptosis) of the luteal cells (reviewed in [1]). Although in some species both events occur simultaneously, in others the CL first loses its ability to secrete large amounts of progesterone and then degenerates. For example, in hamsters the CL of the estrous cycle undergoes concomitant loss of its progesterone-producing capacity and induction of apoptosis of the luteal cells, resulting in a nearly complete disappearance of the gland within one estrous cycle [2]. In contrast, in cycling rats several consecutive estrous cycles are needed to complete the process of structural luteal regression [35]. The same dissociation between the decline in luteal progesterone production and luteal cell death occurs at the end of pregnancy in the rat. Although the ability of the CL to secrete progesterone drops markedly between Days 20 and 22 of pregnancy, no sign of severe apoptosis can be found at this time [6]. It is only after parturition that a large increase in the number of luteal cells undergoing apoptosis and a significant decrease in the mass of the gland can be observed [6, 7].

We recently demonstrated in pregnant rats that luteal regression and apoptosis can be accelerated by the administration of either the antigestagen RU486 or prostaglandin F2{alpha} [8], both of which induce abrupt declines in the capacity of the CL to produce progesterone. We have also shown that progesterone and androstenedione significantly interfere with apoptosis after parturition [6, 9]. Because in pregnant rats androstenedione is the main circulating androgen [10] and progesterone is the major steroid produced within the CL [11], one can speculate that these steroids could be responsible for protecting luteal cells from undergoing apoptosis during most of the pregnancy. CLs undergoing apoptosis after parturition were capable of being partially rescued by androgen or progestin [6, 9], suggesting that the gland, even during regression, maintains certain levels of function that can be rescued under appropriate stimuli. These findings indicate that the rat CL of pregnancy undergoes apoptosis during luteal regression and that this process can be hormonally regulated.

In the present study, we used an ex vivo approach to examine whether the ability of the CL to undergo apoptosis in vitro is developmentally regulated in pregnancy and after parturition. In addition, we examined the impact of the change in the in vivo hormonal environment on the susceptibility of the CL to apoptosis in vitro by inducing postpartum animals to begin lactation. By using a luteal cell line that undergoes apoptosis in culture upon serum deprivation [12, 13], we studied whether prolactin (one of the main luteotropic hormones in pregnant rats [11, 14]) protects the luteal cells from apoptosis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Adult female rats (originally Wistar strain) weighing 180–220 g were housed under controlled light (lights-on from 0600 h to 2000 h) and temperature (22–24°C) conditions and had free access to standard rat chow (Cargill, Mendoza, Argentina) and tap water. To induce pregnancy, female rats were caged individually with fertile males beginning on the afternoon of proestrus. Mating was verified on the following morning by identifying sperm or copulation plugs in the vagina. This day was designated as Day 0 of pregnancy. In our laboratory, rats usually give birth on Day 22. Animals were killed by decapitation and handled in conformance with the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [15]. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Experimental Procedure

In the first experiment, three rats per group were killed on Days 21 and 22 of pregnancy and on Days 1, 2, 3, and 4 postpartum. The CLs were isolated from the ovaries under a stereoscopic microscope, weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until processed for isolation of genomic DNA. For the animals killed after parturition, only the CLs of the previous pregnancy were studied [6].

In the second experiment, three rats per group were killed on Days 7, 14, and 21 of pregnancy and on Day 4 after parturition. The CLs were isolated from the ovaries and used for in vitro incubation for various hours. At the end of the incubation, the CLs were either collected for DNA isolation and analysis of DNA fragmentation or embedded in paraffin for in situ evaluation of apoptosis. Only the CLs of the previous pregnancy were evaluated from ovaries of animals killed postpartum.

To determine the effect of lactation on luteal apoptosis, a third experiment was performed using two groups of postpartum rats (five or six rats per group). In the nonlactating group, the pups were removed from the mothers immediately after delivery, whereas in the lactating group the number of pups per mother was adjusted to eight, and these pups were maintained until the end of the experiment. The mothers were killed at 1300 h on Day 4 postpartum, and trunk blood was obtained to determine hormone concentrations. The ovaries were removed and fixed for 1 h at room temperature in a solution of 10% phosphate-buffered neutral formalin, dehydrated in an ethanol series, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin for routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. In two other groups of animals subjected to a similar experimental approach (six to eight rats per group), the CLs were isolated under a stereoscopic microscope, weighed, and used for in vitro incubation. Only CLs of the previous pregnancy were evaluated. The isolation of CLs of the previous pregnancy and the newly formed CLs after postpartum ovulation was performed under a stereoscopic microscope as previously reported [6].

Incubation of CLs

The CLs (four to six CLs/ml in each well of a 24-well tissue culture plate) were incubated in serum-free medium (McCoy 5A:Ham F12 1:1, v/v; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) containing 25 mM Hepes, 200 IU/ml penicillin G, 200 µg/ml of streptomycin, and 0.5 µg/ml amphotericin B at 37°C for various periods of time in an atmosphere of 95% air/5% CO2. After incubation, the CLs used for analysis of DNA fragmentation by gel electrophoresis were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until isolation of genomic DNA. CLs used for in situ detection of apoptosis were fixed for 1 h at room temperature in a solution of 10% phosphate-buffered neutral formalin, dehydrated in an ethanol series, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin [6, 8].

Luteal Cell Line

The simian virus 40-transformed temperature-sensitive rat luteal cell line GG-CL stably transfected with the long form of the prolactin receptor was used [12, 13, 16]. These cells multiply at the permissive temperature of 33°C and form a multilayer. However, if they are cultured at the nonpermissive temperature of 39°C, they revert to a normal differentiated phenotype similar to that of primary luteal cells in culture [12]. In the present experiment, GG-CL cells were cultured at 33°C to 60% confluence, differentiated at 39°C over 48 h, and then subjected to conditions of serum starvation for various times. At the end of the incubation, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Alteration of the chromatin was observed using a Leica DM/IRB microscope (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL).

Detection of Apoptosis In Situ

Serial paraffin-embedded sections (5 µm thickness) were mounted on 3-aminopropyltriethoxy-silane (Sigma)-coated slides and used for routine H&E staining. The sections were observed and photographed with a Nikon Eclipse E 400 microscope (Fryer Company, Huntley, IL). Apoptotic cells were recognized in H&E-stained sections on the basis of morphological criteria following the procedure described by Van de Shepop et al. [17] with slight modifications [6, 8]. Only cells with advanced signs of apoptosis (i.e., containing multiple nuclear fragments) were counted. A microscope with a 100x objective was used, and a large number of fields were analyzed in each CL for the presence of fragmented nuclei. All the CLs in each section were studied, and an average number of apoptotic nuclei per high-power field was obtained. The expression of apoptosis per unit area rather than per CL more accurately reflects the dynamic of the apoptotic process within each CL in a size-independent manner at any given time during pregnancy and after parturition. When apoptosis was studied in lactating versus nonlactating controls, the results were expressed relative to the nonlactating control, in which the number of apoptotic cells was considered to be 100%. This morphometric method for the identification of apoptotic cells was previously validated in the CL by in situ 3' end labeling [8].

Nuclei exhibiting DNA fragmentation were also confirmed by using the DeadEnd Colorimetric Apoptosis System (Promega, Madison, WI), which end labels the fragmented DNA of apoptotic cells using a modified TUNEL assay in paraffin-embedded sections, as previously described [8].

DNA Fragmentation

The internucleosomal cleavage of DNA was analyzed as follows. GG-CL cells or CLs were digested overnight at 50°C in a buffer composed of 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0), 25 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 0.5% SDS, and 0.1 mg/ml proteinase K (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD). The DNA was extracted from the digested tissues with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, v/v/v), precipitated, and digested for 1 h at 37°C in 1 µg/ml RNase (DNase free; Roche, Indianapolis, IN). After extraction and precipitation, an equal amount of DNA for each sample (5 µg) was separated by electrophoresis on a 1.8% agarose gel (FMC Corp., BioProducts, Rockland, ME) impregnated with ethidium bromide, examined using an ultraviolet transilluminator (UVP, Upland, CA), and photographed with a photodocumentation camera (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). A 100-base pair (bp) DNA ladder (Promega) was used for determining the size of the DNA fragments. NIH image software was used to semiquantitate the fragmented DNA. The densitometry of the DNA fragments below 1500 bp was recorded and normalized against the density of the total genomic DNA of the sample (to correct for DNA loading). To allow comparisons between different gels, the densitometric values were expressed for CL as relative to the fragmentation at time zero of incubation and for GG-CL as relative to the fragmentation obtained after 48 h of incubation in serum-free medium.

Hormone Assays

Serum prolactin was determined by double antibody RIA with reagents provided by the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases (Bethesda, MD). Results are expressed in terms of the rat prolactin RP-3 standard. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.5 ng/tube. Inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were <10%.

Progesterone concentrations were measured using a commercially obtained kit (Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA). The sensitivity of the assay was 0.02 ng/ml, and the inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 5% and 6%, respectively.

RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total RNA from CLs was purified using TRIzol (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed using the Advantage RT for PCR kit (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA). For amplification of the reverse transcription (RT) products, the reaction mixture consisted of 1x polymerase chain reaction (PCR) buffer (ExTaq buffer; Panvera, Madison, WI), 150 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 50 pmol of specific oligonucleotide primers, and 0.8 U ExTaq (Panvera) in a final volume of 40 µl. The samples were overlaid with light mineral oil, and PCRs were carried out in a PTC-1000 thermal cycler (MJ Research, Walthan, MA). Oligonucleotide primer pairs were based on the sequence of the long form of the rat prolactin receptor (5'-AAAGTATCTTGTCCAGACTCGCTG-3' and 5'-AGCAGTTCTTCAGACTTGCCCTT-3') gene as previously used [18]. Primers for L19 (5'-CTGAAGGTCAAAGGGAATGTG-3' and 5'-GGACAGAGTCTTGATATCTC-3') ribosomal protein mRNA were included to normalize the data [19]. The predicted sizes of the PCR-amplified products were 279 and 120 bp for the prolactin receptor long form and L19, respectively. Reaction products were electrophoresed on 1.8% agarose gels, visualized with ethidium bromide, and examined by ultraviolet transillumination.

Statistical Analysis

Comparison between means of two groups was carried out using the Student t-test. For multiple comparisons, a one-way ANOVA was followed by either the Tukey or Dunnet multiple-comparison test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Luteal DNA Fragmentation Is Induced under Serum-Free Conditions

Apoptosis, as determined by DNA laddering, was not observed in CLs isolated at either of the last days of pregnancy (Days 21 and 22) or throughout the 4 days following parturition (Fig. 1A). An increase in the number of cells undergoing apoptosis after parturition has been observed in situ [6], but the number of cells undergoing apoptosis at the same time may not be sufficient to allow for visualization of DNA breakdown. In sharp contrast, large scale DNA fragmentation was observed in cultured CLs isolated from rats on Day 21 of pregnancy (Fig. 1B) and 4 days postpartum (Fig. 1C). However, the time course of DNA breakdown differed depending on the gestational stage of the animal. Whereas fragmented DNA was visible only after 6 h of incubation in CLs obtained from Day 21 pregnant rats (Fig. 1B), visible DNA laddering was observed after only 1 h of incubation in CLs obtained from rats killed on Day 4 postpartum (Fig. 1C). Further analysis of apoptosis was performed 4 days after parturition on CLs either freshly isolated (Fig. 2A) or after incubation in serum-free medium for 6 h (Fig. 2, B and C). An H&E-stained section of a freshly isolated CL (Fig. 2A) contained only a few cells undergoing apoptosis. However, after 6 h of incubation, a large increase in the number of nuclei displaying features of apoptosis was visible in the H&E-stained sections (Fig. 2B), an increase further confirmed by in situ 3' end labeling of the fragmented DNA (i.e., TUNEL) (Fig. 2C). All features of apoptosis distinguished in vitro are summarized in Figure 3, beginning with a healthy nucleus with dispersed chromatin (Fig. 3A). Early in the process of apoptosis, condensation of the chromatin (Fig. 3B) and its alternative localization on the margin of the nucleus (Fig. 3C) are apparent. When the process of apoptosis advances, large pieces of fragmented chromatin appear (Fig. 3, D and E). Small pieces of fragmented chromatin can also be clearly observed (Fig. 3, F–I), denoting very advanced apoptosis.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Fragmentation of genomic DNA obtained from freshly isolated CLs of rats killed on Days 21 and 22 of pregnancy (PREG) or on Days 1 (+1), 2 (+2), 3 (+3), and 4 (+4) after parturition (PP) (A) and from CLs extracted from animals killed on Day 21 of pregnancy (B) or on Day 4 postpartum (C) and subjected to in vitro incubation under serum-free conditions for various times. Genomic DNA was extracted and electrophoresed on a gel. The experiments were conducted twice with similar outcomes. bp, Base pairs



View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. In situ detection of apoptosis in rat CL after incubation under serum-free conditions. CLs were isolated from animals killed on Day 4 after parturition and incubated in serum-free medium for 6 h (B and C). Following incubation, the CLs were fixed and embedded in paraffin, and sections were processed for routine H&E staining (B) and in situ 3' end labeling (i.e.,TUNEL) (C). CLs fixed and embedded in paraffin immediately after isolation were used as controls (A, H&E staining). Arrows indicate apoptotic nuclei; arrowheads indicate healthy nuclei. Magnification x400



View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Apoptotic figures observed in rat CL after incubation in serum-free conditions. CLs were obtained from animals killed on Day 4 after parturition and incubated for 6 h in serum-free medium. At the end of incubation, the CLs were fixed and embedded in paraffin, and sections were processed for routine H&E staining. A) Healthy nucleus. BI) Nuclei displaying different features of chromatin condensation. Magnification x1000

CLs Obtained at Different Stages of Pregnancy and after Parturition Have Differential Sensitivity to Apoptosis In Vitro

By counting the number of apoptotic nuclei based on the previous analysis, we determined that the number of apoptotic figures always increased with time of incubation regardless of the developmental stage of the CL. Using this approach, we examined the total number of cells undergoing apoptosis in CLs obtained at different stages of pregnancy and after parturition, following 8 h of incubation under serum-free conditions. There was a large difference in the number of cells undergoing apoptosis, depending on the developmental stage during pregnancy and after parturition at which the animals were killed (Fig. 4A). A relatively high number of cells undergoing apoptosis was found early in pregnancy on Day 7, whereas only a few cells with apoptotic features could be detected later in pregnancy, at either Day 14 or Day 21. When CLs obtained from animals killed on Day 4 postpartum were incubated for 8 h, severe apoptosis was observed (Fig. 4A). Because progesterone protects luteal cells from apoptosis [6, 20], we examined the capacity of the CL to produce progesterone while undergoing apoptosis in vitro. The progesterone concentration in the medium increased with time of incubation (Fig. 4B). However, there were no significant differences in the amount of progesterone released to the medium by CLs from animals killed on different days of pregnancy and by CLs obtained after parturition.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. A) Number of apoptotic cells per unit area in CLs obtained from rats killed on Days 7, 14, and 21 of pregnancy and on Day 4 after parturition. After removal from the ovaries, the CLs from each group of animals were pooled, separated into three wells for each time of incubation, and incubated in serum-free medium for 8 h. At the end of the incubation period, each group of CLs was fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin, and sections were processed for H&E staining. The number of apoptotic figures was counted under a light microscope. Data are the mean ± SEM for CLs (n = 20–30) from three different rats per day. *P < 0.05 compared with Day 7; **P < 0.01 compared with Days 14 and 21 (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey multiple-comparison test). This experiment was conducted twice with similar outcomes. B) Culture medium was obtained from each time point during the incubation of the CLs, and progesterone concentrations were determined by RIA and expressed as nanograms per milliliter accumulated on a per CL basis. The value at each time point represents the mean ± SEM of progesterone concentration of three different wells. D 7, D 15, D 21, and D +4 are Days 7, 15, and 21 of pregnancy and Day 4 postpartum, respectively

Differential Sensitivity of Rat CLs to Apoptosis In Vitro Depends on the In Vivo Hormonal Environment

Because the rat CL is subjected to different hormonal environments during pregnancy and after parturition [10, 11, 14], we hypothesized that changes in the circulating levels of various hormones result in changes in the sensitivity of the CL to apoptosis. We obtained CLs from nonlactating and lactating mothers that were killed on Day 4 postpartum. At the time of death, the circulating concentration of prolactin was higher in lactating rats than in mothers whose pups where removed immediately after parturition (nonlactating controls, Fig. 5A). The lactating animals also displayed higher concentrations of progesterone in circulation compared with nonlactating controls (Fig. 5B). The establishment of lactation reduced significantly the number of nuclei undergoing apoptosis (Fig. 5C), whereas it partially prevented the decrease in the weight of CLs in nonlactating controls killed on Day 4 postpartum (Fig. 5D). When CLs from similar groups of animals were incubated under serum-free conditions, the induction of DNA fragmentation was significantly delayed in CLs harvested from lactating rats compared with those harvested from nonlactating controls (Fig. 6, A–C).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Effect of lactation on serum concentrations of prolactin (A) and progesterone (B) and on rat CL apoptosis (C) and weight (D) after parturition. After delivery, the mothers were either separated from their pups (nonlactating group, NL) or maintained with eight pups (lactating group, L) and killed 4 days later at 1300 h. At death, trunk blood was taken to measure serum prolactin and progesterone concentrations by RIA. Hormone values are expressed as mean ± SEM from eight animals per group. The ovaries of the same animals were processed for routine H&E staining, and the number of apoptotic figures was counted under a light microscope and expressed relative to the control (NL) group, in which the number of apoptotic cells was considered to be 100%. The average weight of the CL was recorded in two additional groups of six to eight animals each. **P < 0.01 compared with NL (Student t-test)



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Effect of lactation on DNA fragmentation in rat CLs incubated in vitro under serum-free conditions. At the end of incubation, genomic DNA was extracted from CLs of nonlactating (A) or lactating (B) animals and electrophoresed on a gel. Densitometry of the DNA fragments from three different gels with similar outcomes is also shown (C). CLs from six to eight animals were pooled for each experiment, which was repeated three times. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with values at Time 0 (one-way ANOVA followed by the Dunnet multiple-comparison test). bp, Base pairs

Prolactin Interferes with Luteal Cell Death

Because circulating concentrations of progesterone and prolactin are both elevated in lactating rats and because prolactin is a strong stimulus for the production of progesterone at this reproductive stage [21], we examined whether prolactin could be a survival factor for the CL by eliciting a direct effect not mediated by progesterone. We first determined the expression of prolactin receptor mRNA in the CL before, during, and after parturition. After a marked reduction in prolactin receptor mRNA expression at the end of pregnancy, a total recovery in expression was observed 4 days after parturition, reaching levels similar to those found during pregnancy before Day 21 (Fig. 7). The expression of the prolactin receptor postpartum indicates that at this reproductive stage the CL can be a target for prolactin. To examine whether prolactin directly interferes with apoptosis in luteal cells, we used an in vitro experimental approach. Prolactin injected into rats postpartum induces an increase in the production of progesterone [21], which per se is a survival factor for the CL [6, 22]. Hence, we used a luteal cell line that expresses the prolactin receptor but does not produce progesterone [12, 16]. Time course analysis indicated that these luteal cells undergo apoptosis in serum-free medium within 24 h, as demonstrated by chromatin condensation (Fig. 8) and DNA fragmentation (Fig. 9A). Addition of prolactin to the medium significantly reduced the extent of DNA fragmentation in these cells (Fig. 9, B and C).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Expression of prolactin receptor in rat CL during pregnancy and after parturition. Total RNA was obtained from CLs on Days 15, 20, and 21 of pregnancy and from nonlactating rats killed on Day 4 postpartum (PP). The RNA was isolated from three different animals on each of the days and analyzed by RT-PCR. A representative gel is shown. On Day 4 PP, the expression of prolactin receptor was studied in the CLs of the previous pregnancy



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Culture of GG-CL luteal cells under serum starvation conditions. GG-CL cells were cultured in the presence of serum at 33°C to 60 % confluence and differentiated for 48 h at 39°C. The cells were then incubated in serum-free medium for 0 h (A), 24 h (B), or 48 h (C). At the end of the incubation, the cells were fixed and stained with DAPI. Arrows show chromatin condensation. Magnification x400



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. Effect of prolactin on DNA fragmentation in serum-starved luteal cells. A) GG-CL cells were cultured under serum-free conditions for 0, 4, 24, and 48 h. Genomic DNA was isolated and subjected to gel electrophoresis. A representative gel is shown. B) GG-CL cells were serum starved in the presence of various concentrations of prolactin for 48 h. Densitometric units depicting the degree of DNA fragmentation calculated from three different gels are shown (C). *P < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey multiple-comparison test). bp, Base pairs


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our previous morphological studies have revealed that in the rat CL the index of apoptosis is very low throughout the long gestational luteal phase in pregnancy, but a marked increase in the number of luteal cells undergoing apoptosis occurs after parturition, accompanying the decrease in the mass of the gland [6]. However, the result of the present study clearly show that breakdown of genomic DNA as analyzed by gel electrophoresis is not discernable in CLs undergoing luteal regression at the end of pregnancy and after parturition at a time when features of apoptosis can be clearly observed morphologically [6]. These results suggest that in the rat CL of pregnancy, the number of cells undergoing apoptosis at the same time is very low and therefore not sufficient to allow for the visualization of fragmented DNA by gel electrophoresis. We also showed that if the CLs are placed in culture, a large number of cells undergo apoptosis, as easily confirmed by DNA fragmentation analysis. The system involved in the removal of apoptotic cells within the CL, possibly driven by the infiltration of circulating macrophages as suggested by other investigators [2325], may not be functional in vitro as a consequence of the isolation of the gland from the organism, therefore allowing for the accumulation of apoptotic cells. However, a better explanation of our results is that the CL has a suicide program ready to be triggered unless a tropic hormone prevents its initiation. Thus, by placing the CL in vitro, the tropic support that the CL had in vivo is removed, allowing for the apoptotic machinery to become active.

After observing the morphological features of apoptosis in regressed CLs in vivo [8] and in CLs subjected to various hours of incubation in vitro (present study), it is clear that more advanced features of apoptosis are observed in vitro. In vivo, evidence of apoptosis includes single small, densely stained nuclei (pyknotic appearance), nuclei containing marginated chromatin, and cells containing multiple densely stained nuclear fragments [8]. In vitro, all these features of apoptosis are also visible (see Figs. 2, B and C, and 3, B–E), but cells containing multiple smaller fragments of chromatin are also present (see Figs. 2, B and C, and 3, F–I). This observation suggests that under conditions of starvation the apoptotic process may involve additional steps that could explain the further fragmentation of the chromatin.

Although apoptosis occurred in vitro in CLs obtained at all stages of pregnancy and after parturition, the time necessary for the appearance of DNA breakdown was markedly different in CLs at different developmental stages. CLs obtained during the second half of pregnancy were more resistant to apoptosis than were those of early pregnancy and postpartum, i.e., more time elapsed before the appearance of signs of DNA fragmentation in vitro. This finding indicates that the CL has differential sensitivity to apoptosis in vitro. This difference in sensitivity does not appear to be due to different levels of progesterone to which the CL is subjected in vitro because the concentration of progesterone measured in the CL incubation medium at different stages during development was similar in all groups. The differential susceptibility of the CL to apoptosis probably depends on the in vivo hormonal environment and, in particular, on the protective effects of progesterone and prolactin. Evidence for this is the clear delay in the appearance of fragmented DNA observed during lactation, which induces an increase in both circulating prolactin and progesterone. The effect of lactation on the process of structural luteal regression was also demonstrated by the partial prevention of the decrease of luteal weight and of the increase in number of apoptotic cells observed in regressing CLs after parturition. The capacity of the postpartum CL to react to changes in the circulating hormonal environment of the animal was also recently shown; postpartum treatment with progestin or androgen provoked a delay in DNA fragmentation induced by in vitro starvation of the CL [6, 9]. These findings indicate that different hormonal environments are responsible for determining the life span of the CL, which can be maintained in a functional state for a longer time, e.g., during pregnancy, or a shorter time, e.g., during the estrous cycle. In these two reproductive stages, the hormonal regulation of luteal function is very different and the CLs are exposed to dissimilar hormonal environments [10, 11, 26, 27]. Another possible explanation for the higher resistance to apoptosis of CLs during the second half of pregnancy is their exposure to placental lactogens, which have a longer half-life than does prolactin and may continue to protect the CL after isolation.

All types of CLs subjected to incubation in vitro were still able to release progesterone, even while undergoing apoptosis (see Fig. 4B). Because the index of apoptosis in the CL is negatively correlated with the mass of the CL [6] (Fig. 5, C and D), we expressed the amount of progesterone released to the medium on a per CL basis. However, CLs freshly isolated on Day 7 of pregnancy and Day 4 postpartum have an average weight of approximately 2 mg/unit, whereas those isolated on Days 14 and 21 of pregnancy are approximately two to three times heavier [6]. Therefore, even though there was no difference in the total amount of progesterone accumulated in the culture medium among the groups (Fig. 5), heavier CLs, such as those from Days 14 and 21 of pregnancy, probably produce less progesterone than do the small CLs of Day 7 of pregnancy and Day 4 postpartum. Smaller CLs also display more apoptosis, suggesting that when the apoptotic machinery is fully activated, the gland appears to release more progesterone during at least the 17 h of incubation in the experiment. This result agrees with previous observations in primary and immortalized granulosa cells [28, 29], in which organelles associated with steroidogenesis remained intact and highly organized during the first 24 h of induction of apoptosis and chromatin condensation and breakdown of the nuclear membrane occurred while high levels of progesterone were still being produced. Likewise, a large number of apoptotic cells can be found within the CL after parturition [6] while the gland retains its steroidogenic capacity, which is reflected in the high output of 20{alpha}-dihydroprogesterone, a metabolite of progesterone [18]. However, it is not known whether 20{alpha}-dihydroprogesterone plays a physiological role in luteal apoptosis.

After parturition, the fate of the CLs of pregnancy is uncertain. Between 36 and 48 h after parturition, a postpartum ovulatory process takes place, allowing the formation of a new cohort of CLs [30]. These newly formed CLs, also known as CLs of lactation, are thought to be responsible for producing progesterone during lactation under the tropic control of prolactin [4, 21, 31], which is secreted upon the stimulus of suckling by the pups [3234]. However, the role (if any) of the old CLs of pregnancy during lactation is totally unknown. In the present study, we clearly showed that mRNA encoding the long form of the prolactin receptor is highly expressed in the CLs after parturition, after being strongly downregulated just before parturition [18] (Fig. 7). The expression of the prolactin receptor in old CLs of pregnancy and in newly formed CLs after postpartum ovulation (unpublished data) demonstrates that both CL subtypes can be targets of prolactin action during the first stages of lactation.

Because progesterone interferes with luteal cell death [6] and because prolactin is a potent stimulator of luteal progesterone production [10, 14], we examined whether prolactin is an antiapoptotic factor for luteal cells independent of its stimulatory effect on progesterone. The use of a prolactin-responsive rat luteal cell line that carries the long form of the prolactin receptor [12, 16] and is unable to produce progesterone [12] allowed us to demonstrate an antiapoptotic role for prolactin that could not be mediated by progesterone.

The GG-CL luteal cell line expresses the glucocorticoid receptor and the estrogen receptor ß [12] and responds to the action of glucocorticoid [22], progestin [22], and estrogen [16]. Therefore, the induction of cell death in this cell line when subjected to conditions of serum starvation not only opens a new avenue for the study of intracellular mechanisms governing luteal cell death but also provides a compelling model for study of the effects of various hormones on luteal cell function and survival. The fact that prolactin prevented cell death induced by starvation makes this cell line a powerful model for study of the molecular mechanisms whereby prolactin prevents apoptosis.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Rubén Carón and Mrs. Elina Dinazzo for their assistance with the prolactin RIA, Virginia Calvo for her technical support, and the Hormone Distribution Program, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases for providing the materials for the prolactin RIA. We are also grateful to Dr. Barbara Goodman for critical review of the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This research was supported by grants 5 P20 RR16479-02 from NIH/NCRR, HD 11119 from NIH/NICHD, and PICT 1999-05-06877 BID1201-OC AR from the National Agency for Research and Technology of Argentina. Back

2 Correspondence: C.M. Telleria, Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, University of South Dakota School of Medicine, 414 East Clark St., Vermillion, SD 57069. FAX: 605 677 6381; ctelleri{at}usd.edu Back

Received: 15 November 2002.

First decision: 9 December 2002.

Accepted: 28 January 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Davis JS, Rueda BR. The corpus luteum: an ovarian structure with maternal instincts and suicidal tendencies. Front Biosci 2002 7:d1949-d1978[Medline]
  2. McCormack JT, Friederichs MG, Limback SD, Greenwald GS. Apoptosis during spontaneous luteolysis in the cyclic golden hamster: biochemical and morphological evidence. Biol Reprod 1998 58:255-260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bowen JM, Towns R, Warren JS, Keyes PL. Luteal regression in the normally cycling rat: apoptosis, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and inflammatory cell involvement. Biol Reprod 1999 60:740-746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Long JA, Evans HM. The estrous cycle of the rat and its associated phenomena. Mem Univ Calif 1922 6:1-148
  5. Bowen JM, Keyes PL. Repeated exposure to prolactin is required to induce luteal regression in the hypophysectomized rat. Biol Reprod 2000 63:1179-1184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Goyeneche AA, Deis RP, Gibori G, Telleria CM. Progesterone promotes survival of the rat corpus luteum in the absence of cognate receptors. Biol Reprod 2003 68:151-158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Guo K, Wolf V, Dharmarajan AM, Feng Z, Bielke W, Saurer S, Friis R. Apoptosis-associated gene expression in the corpus luteum of the rat. Biol Reprod 1998 58:739-746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Telleria CM, Goyeneche AA, Cavicchia JC, Stati AO, Deis RP. Apoptosis induced by antigestagen RU486 in rat corpus luteum of pregnancy. Endocrine 2001 15:147-155[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Goyeneche AA, Calvo V, Gibori G, Telleria CM. Androstenedione interferes in luteal regression by inhibiting apoptosis and stimulating progesterone production. Biol Reprod 2002 66:1540-1547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gibori G, Khan I, Warshaw ML, McLean MP, Puryear TK, Nelson S, Durkee TJ, Azhar S, Steinschneider A, Rao MC. Placental-derived regulators and the complex control of luteal cell function. Recent Prog Horm Res 1988 44:377-429
  11. Gibori G. The corpus luteum of pregnancy. In: Adashi EY, Leung PCK (eds.), The Ovary. New York: Raven Press; 1994:261–317
  12. Sugino N, Zilberstein M, Srivastava RK, Telleria CM, Nelson SE, Risk M, Chou JY, Gibori G. Establishment and characterization of a simian virus 40-transformed temperature-sensitive rat luteal cell line. Endocrinology 1998 139:1936-1942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Goyeneche AA, Telleria CM, Gibori G. Apoptosis induced by serum deprivation in rat luteal cells. Biol Reprod 2002 66:suppl 1285 (abstract 462)
  14. Risk M, Gibori G. Mechanisms of luteal cell regulation by prolactin. In: Horseman ND (ed.), Prolactin. New York: Kluwer; 2001:265–295
  15. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals , Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Bethesda, MD: National Academy of Sciences; 1996
  16. Telleria CM, Zhong L, Deb S, Srivastava RK, Park KS, Sugino N, Park-Sarge OK, Gibori G. Differential expression of the estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß in the rat corpus luteum of pregnancy: regulation by prolactin and placental lactogens. Endocrinology 1998 139:2432-2442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Van der Shepop HAM, de Jong JS, van Diest PJ, Bagnell CA. Counting of apoptotic cells: a methodological study in invasive breast cancer. J Clin Pathol Mol Pathol 1996 49:M214-M217
  18. Telleria CM, Parmer TG, Zhong L, Clarke DL, Albarracin CT, Duan WR, Linzer DIH, Gibori G. The different forms of the prolactin receptor in the rat corpus luteum: developmental expression and hormonal regulation in pregnancy. Endocrinology 1997 138:4812-4820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Chan Y, Lin A, McNally J, Peleg J, Meyuhas O, Wool IG. The primary structure of rat ribosomal protein L19. J Biol Chem 1987 262:1111-1115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kuranaga E, Kanuka H, Hirabayashi K, Suzuki M, Nishihara M, Takashashi M. Progesterone is a cell death suppressor that downregulates Fas expression in rat corpus luteum. FEBS Lett 2000 466:279-282[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Tomogane H, Ota K, Yokoyama A. Suppression of progesterone secretion in lactating rats by administration of ergocornine and the effect of prolactin replacement. J Endocrinol 1975 65:155-161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sugino N, Telleria CM, Gibori G. Progesterone inhibits 20{alpha}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase expression in the rat corpus luteum through the glucocorticoid receptor. Endocrinology 1997 138:4497-4500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bagavandoss P, Wiggins RC, Kunkel SL, Remick DG, Keyes PL. Tumor necrosis factor production and accumulation of inflammatory cells in the corpus luteum of pseudopregnancy and pregnancy in rabbits. Biol Reprod 1990 42:367-376[Abstract]
  24. Pate JL, Keyes PL. Immune cells in the corpus luteum: friends or foes?. Reproduction 2001 122:665-676[Abstract]
  25. Abdo M, Hisheh S, Dharmarajan A. Role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and the modulating effect of the caspases in rat corpus luteum apoptosis. Biol Reprod 2003; 68:1241–1248
  26. Richards JS. Gonadotropin-regulated gene expression in the ovary. In: Adashi EY, Leung PCK (eds.), The Ovary. New York: Raven Press; 1994: 93–111
  27. Murphy BD. Models of luteinization. Biol Reprod 2000 63:2-11[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Aharoni D, Dantes A, Oren M, Amsterdam A. cAMP-mediated signals as determinants for apoptosis in primary granulosa cells. Exp Cell Res 1995 218:271-282[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Keren-Tal I, Suh BS, Dantes A, Lindner S, Oren M, Amsterdam A. Involvement of p53 expression in cAMP-mediated apoptosis in immortalized granulosa cells. Exp Cell Res 1995 218:283-295[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Rothchild I. Regulation of the mammalian corpus luteum. Recent Prog Horm Res 1981 37:183-298
  31. Tomogane H, Ota K, Yokoyama A. Progesterone and 20{alpha}-hydroxypregn-4-en-3-one levels in ovarian vein blood of the rat throughout lactation. J Endocrinol 1969 44:101-106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Grosvenor CE, Mena F. Evidence for a time delay between prolactin release and the resulting rise in milk secretion rate in the rat. J Endocrinol 1973 58:31-39[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Leong DA, Frawley SL, Neill JD. Neuroendocrine control of prolactin secretion. Annu Rev Physiol 1983 45:109-127[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Deis RP, Carrizo DG, Jahn GA. Suckling-induced prolactin release potentiates mifepristone-induced lactogenesis in pregnant rats. J Reprod Fertil 1989 87:147-153[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. C. Peluffo, R. L. Stouffer, and M. Tesone
Activity and expression of different members of the caspase family in the rat corpus luteum during pregnancy and postpartum
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1215 - E1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. Stocco, C. Telleria, and G. Gibori
The Molecular Control of Corpus Luteum Formation, Function, and Regression
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2007; 28(1): 117 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. C Peluffo, L. Bussmann, R. L Stouffer, and M. Tesone
Expression of caspase-2, -3, -8 and -9 proteins and enzyme activity in the corpus luteum of the rat at different stages during the natural estrous cycle.
Reproduction, September 1, 2006; 132(3): 465 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. A Goyeneche, J. M Harmon, and C. M Telleria
Cell death induced by serum deprivation in luteal cells involves the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis
Reproduction, January 1, 2006; 131(1): 103 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. J. Peluso, A. Pappalardo, R. Losel, and M. Wehling
Expression and Function of PAIRBP1 Within Gonadotropin-Primed Immature Rat Ovaries: PAIRBP1 Regulation of Granulosa and Luteal Cell Viability
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2005; 73(2): 261 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. Takiguchi, N. Sugino, K. Esato, A. Karube-Harada, A. Sakata, Y. Nakamura, H. Ishikawa, and H. Kato
Differential Regulation of Apoptosis in the Corpus Luteum of Pregnancy and Newly Formed Corpus Luteum after Parturition in Rats
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2004; 70(2): 313 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/6/2322    most recent
biolreprod.102.013540v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goyeneche, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Telleria, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goyeneche, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Telleria, C. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Goyeneche, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Telleria, C. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS