Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print January 8, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.013573
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/1/92    most recent
biolreprod.102.013573v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pfarrer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pfarrer, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pfarrer, C.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 69, 92–98 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.013573
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Pregnancy

Osteopontin Is Synthesized by Uterine Glands and a 45-kDa Cleavage Fragment Is Localized at the Uterine-Placental Interface Throughout Ovine Pregnancy1

Greg A. Johnson2,3,4, Robert C. Burghardt3,4, Margaret M. Joyce3,4, Thomas E. Spencer3,5, Fuller W. Bazer3,5, C. Allison Gray3,5, and Christiane Pfarrer6

Center for Animal Biotechnology and Genomics,3 Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Public Health,4 College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Science,5 College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Histology and Embryology,6 Justus-Liebig-University, 35392 Giessen, Germany


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Osteopontin (OPN) is a phosphorylated and glycosylated, secreted protein that is present in various epithelial cells and biological fluids. On freezing and thawing or treatment with proteases, the native 70-kDa protein gives rise to 45- and 24-kDa fragments. Secreted OPN functions as an extracellular matrix (ECM) protein that binds cell surface receptors to mediate cell-cell adhesion, cell-ECM communication, and cell migration. In sheep and humans, OPN is proposed to be a secretory product of uterine glandular epithelium (GE) that binds to uterine luminal epithelium (LE) and conceptus trophectoderm to mediate conceptus attachment, which is essential to maintain pregnancy through the peri-implantation period. Cell-cell adhesion, communication, and migration likely are important at the interface between uterus and placenta throughout pregnancy, but to our knowledge, endometrial and/or placental expression of OPN beyond the peri-implantation period has not been documented in sheep. Therefore, the present study determined temporal and spatial alterations in OPN mRNA and protein expression in the ovine uterus between Days 25 and 120 of pregnancy. The OPN mRNA in total ovine endometrium increased 30-fold between Days 40 and 80 of gestation. In situ hybridization and immunofluorescence analyses revealed that the predominant source of OPN mRNA and protein throughout pregnancy was the uterine GE. Interestingly, the 45-kDa form of OPN was detected exclusively, continuously, and abundantly along the apical surface of LE, on conceptus trophectoderm, and along the uterine-placental interface of both interplacentomal and placentomal regions through Day 120 of pregnancy. The 45-kDa OPN is a proteolytic cleavage fragment of the native 70-kDa OPN, and it is the most abundant form in uterine flushes during early pregnancy. The 45-kDa OPN is more stimulatory to cell attachment and cell migration than the native 70-kDa protein. Collectively, the present results support the hypothesis that ovine OPN is a component of histotroph secreted by the uterine GE that accumulates at the uterine-placental interface to influence maternal-fetal interactions throughout gestation in sheep.

placenta, pregnancy, uterus


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
All mammalian uteri contain endometrial glands that secrete "histotroph." Histotroph is a complex mixture of a variety of enzymes, growth factors, cytokines, lymphokines, hormones, transport proteins, and other substances [1] that plays a role in conceptus nourishment, attachment, implantation/placentation, and immunoprotection [2, 3]. Studies of ewes in which uterine glands have been epigenetically ablated by neonatal progestin exposure confirm that histotroph is required to maintain pregnancy through the peri-implantation period, when conceptus trophectoderm must adhere to the luminal epithelium (LE) [4].

Osteopontin (OPN) is a component of histotroph [5, 6] that is hypothesized to be involved in ovine implantation [7, 8]. This highly phosphorylated and glycosylated, secreted protein is present in various biological fluids [9]. It also has been found on epithelial cells of the gallbladder, pancreas, lung, sweat ducts, placenta, gastrointestinal, urinary, mammary, and reproductive tracts [1014]. On freezing and thawing or treatment with proteases, the native 70-kDa protein gives rise to 45- and 24-kDa fragments [15]. Secreted OPN functions as an extracellular matrix (ECM) protein that regulates the activity of a variety of cells by signaling through integrin or CD44 receptors [16, 17]. Reported effects of OPN include mediation of cell-cell adhesion, cell-ECM communication, and cell migration [16, 18].

Uterine OPN and its integrin receptors have become the focus of studies concerning conceptus adhesion for implantation in a number of species, including humans, in which OPN expression is increased by progesterone during the menstrual cycle, starting on Days 16–17, and secretory glandular epithelium (GE) appears to be a source of OPN localized on the apical LE surface [19]. In pregnant sheep, OPN protein is a component of histotroph that binds to the apical surface of LE and GE where several integrins are apically expressed and could form known OPN receptors, including {alpha}vß3, {alpha}vß1, {alpha}4ß5, {alpha}4ß1, and {alpha}5ß1 [6, 7]. The form of OPN protein that increases in uterine flushings from pregnant ewes between Days 11 and 17 is predominantly a 45-kDa cleavage fragment that binds with higher affinity to integrins and has greater biological activity than the native 70-kDa OPN [20]. The OPN protein is also present on trophectoderm of Day 14–19 ovine conceptuses despite the absence of conceptus OPN mRNA [6]. The OPN mRNA is expressed in the GE of pregnant ewes and is induced when ovariectomized ewes are given exogenous progesterone [5, 21]. Indeed, uterine gland knockout ewes lack uterine glands and exhibit a peri-implantation defect that is associated with the absence of OPN in uterine secretions [4, 8]. Therefore, OPN is proposed to be a progesterone-induced secretory product of the GE that binds to uterine LE and conceptus trophectoderm to mediate conceptus elongation and attachment, which is essential to maintain pregnancy through the peri-implantation period in ewes.

Although cell-cell adhesion, cell-ECM communication, and cell migration undoubtedly continue to be critical at the interface between uterus and placenta throughout pregnancy, to our knowledge endometrial and/or placental expression of OPN beyond the peri-implantation period has not been documented in ewes. Our working hypothesis is that OPN is a component of histotroph that is secreted by the endometrial GE throughout pregnancy in the ewe and contributes to an ECM that supports maternal-conceptus adhesion and communication. Therefore, the present study determined temporal and spatial alterations in OPN mRNA and protein expression in the ovine uterus and placenta between Days 25 and 120 of pregnancy.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Tissue Collection

Experimental and surgical procedures complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals and were approved by the Texas A&M University Institutional Agricultural Animal Care and Use Committee.

Mature, western-range ewes were observed daily for estrous behavior. After experiencing at least two estrous cycles of normal duration (16–18 days), ewes were assigned randomly on Day 0 (estrus/mating) to cyclic or pregnant status. Fifty-two ewes were ovariohysterectomized (n = 4 ewes/day) on Days 14, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 80, 100, or 120 of pregnancy. At hysterectomy, uteri from Day 14 pregnant ewes were flushed with 0.9% NaCl to verify pregnancy by recovery of an apparently normal conceptus. Pregnancy was verified on all later days by visual observation of conceptus tissues undergoing attachment and placentation. Several sections (thickness, ~1–1.5 cm) from the middle of each uterine horn were fixed in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.2) for 24 h and then embedded in Paraplast Plus (Oxford Labware, St. Louis, MO). Several sections were also embedded in Tissue-Tek Optimal Cutting Temperature Compound (Miles, Oneonta, NY), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. The remaining endometrium was dissected from the myometrium, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C for RNA extraction.

Histological Analysis

Ovine uteri were sectioned (thickness, 5 µm), deparaffinized in CitraSolv (Fisher Scientific; Pittsburgh, PA), and rehydrated through a graded alcohol series to distilled water. Tissues were then exposed to a Masson trichrome staining procedure as previously described [8]. This staining procedure results in black nuclei, red cytoplasm and muscle fibers, and blue ECM components.

RNA Isolation and Analyses

RNA isolation Total cellular RNA was isolated from endometrial tissue samples using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlesbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Slot-blot analysis Steady-state levels of OPN mRNA were assessed in endometrial total RNA samples by slot-blot hybridization analysis as described previously [22] using 20 µg of endometrial total RNA and 32P-labeled antisense ovine OPN cRNA probe [5]. To correct for variation in total RNA loading, a duplicate RNA slot membrane was hybridized with 32P-labeled antisense 18S rRNA cDNA (pT718S; Ambion, Austin, TX). The radioactivity in each slot was quantified by a Typhoon 8600 Imager (Molecular Dynamics, Piscataway, NJ) and expressed as total counts.

In situ hybridization analysis Osteopontin mRNA expression in ovine uterine tissues was localized by in situ hybridization as previously described [5]. Deparaffinized, rehydrated, and deproteinated uterine cross-sections (thickness, 5 µm) were hybridized with 35S-radiolabeled antisense or sense cRNA probes for ovine OPN [5]. Following washes and RNase A digestion, slides were dipped in Kodak NTB-2 liquid photographic emulsion (Kodak, Rochester, NY), stored at 4°C for 5 days, developed in Kodak D-19 developer, counterstained with Harris modified hematoxylin (Fisher Scientific), dehydrated, and protected with coverslips.

Immunofluorescence Analyses

Antibodies used for immunofluorescence staining included rabbit anti-OPN amino terminal (LF-124) and carboxyl terminal (LF-123) [23] and a fluorescein-conjugated goat antibody against rabbit immunoglobulin G (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA). Proteins were localized in frozen ovine uterine cross-sections as previously described [6]. Briefly, tissues were fixed in -20°C methanol, permeabilized with 0.3% Tween 20 in PBS, blocked in 10% normal goat serum, incubated overnight at 4°C with 2 µg/ml of primary antibody, and detected with fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody. Slides were overlaid with a coverglass and Prolong antifade mounting reagent (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR).

Photomicrography

Photomicrographs of representative fields of in situ hybridization, Masson trichrome staining, and immunofluorescence staining were evaluated with a Zeiss Axioplan2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) fitted with a Hamamatsu chilled 3CCD color camera (Hamamatsu Corporation, Bridgewater, NJ). Digital images were captured using Adobe Photoshop 4.0 (Adobe Systems, Seattle, WA) and an Apple PowerMac G3 computer (Apple Computer, Cupertino, CA).

Statistical Analysis

Data from slot-blot hybridization analyses were subjected to least-squares ANOVA using the general linear models procedures of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Effects of day on steady-state levels of endometrial OPN mRNA were examined by regression analysis. Hybridization data (relative units) were normalized for differences in sample loading using the 18S rRNA data as a covariate in ANOVA. Data are presented as least-square-means relative units with overall SEM.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Localization of ECM at the Uterine-Placental Interface

In support of our working hypothesis that OPN is a component of histotroph contributing to an ECM that supports maternal-conceptus adhesion and communication throughout pregnancy, Masson trichrome staining of paraffin-embedded, Day 35 cross-sections revealed the deposition of ECM (blue staining) along the interface between uterine LE and placental tissue (Fig. 1). The following results indicate that OPN is an important constituent of this ECM.



View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Representative photomicrograph of endometrium and placenta from a Day 35 pregnant ewe subjected to Masson trichrome staining. This procedure stains nuclei black, cytoplasm and muscle fibers red, and ECM blue. Note the presence of ECM along the interface between endometrial LE and placental tissue (white arrows). ST, Uterine stroma; TR, conceptus trophectoderm. Width of each field is 250 µm

Expression of OPN mRNA in Total Endometrium

Temporal changes in steady-state levels of OPN mRNA in total ovine endometrium from Days 25 through 120 of pregnancy were quantified by slot-blot hybridization (Fig. 2). The OPN mRNA remained constant through Day 40. Steady-state levels of endometrial OPN mRNA were affected (P < 0.001) by day of pregnancy. Overall, OPN mRNA levels were lowest on Days 20–40, increased 39-fold from Days 40 to 100, and remained maximal thereafter (cubic effect of day, P < 0.0001, r2 = 0.94) (Fig. 2).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Slot-blot hybridization analysis of steady-state levels of OPN mRNA in ovine total endometrium from Day 20 through Day 120 of pregnancy. The OPN mRNA levels are expressed as relative units (RU), normalized for differences in sample loading using the 18S rRNA, in 20 µg of total endometrial mRNA. Data are presented as least-square-means RU with overall SEM

Localization of OPN mRNA Within Endometrial Glands

In situ hybridization analysis of endometrial cross-sections revealed expression of OPN mRNA in the middle to deep GE from Days 20 through 120 of pregnancy (Fig. 3). An increase in total hybridization was evident concomitant with the hypertrophy in endometrial glands that occurs between Days 50 and 60 of pregnancy (Fig. 3). As previously reported, OPN mRNA was also present in endometrial stratum compactum stroma between Days 25 and 120 of pregnancy [24]. However, hybridization was much less in these cells than in GE and is not readily apparent in Figure 3 because of the relative intensity of the GE signal.



View larger version (190K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. In situ hybridization analysis of OPN mRNA in endometrial glandular epithelium (GE) of pregnant ewes. Corresponding bright- and dark-field images of endometrium from different days of pregnancy are shown. A representative section from Day (D) 40 hybridized with radiolabeled sense cRNA probe (Sense) serves as a negative control. LE, luminal epithelium; ST, Uterine stroma. Width of each field is 940 µm

Localization of OPN Protein in the Uterus and Placenta

The location of OPN protein in pregnant ovine uterus and placenta was assessed by immunofluorescence staining of frozen cross-sections using the LF-123 rabbit anti-OPN antibody that detects both native and the carboxyl half of OPN starting at the Arg-Ser (RS) thrombin-cleavage site or the LF-124 antibody that detects both native and the amino half of OPN ending at the RS site (see Fig. 5A).



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Detection of OPN protein in ovine uterus and placenta using immunofluorescence staining of frozen sections. A) Immunoreactive OPN proteins were detected using immunoglobulin (Ig) G (LF-123; [24]) against the carboxyl half of human recombinant OPN (rhOPN) starting at the thrombin (RS) cleavage site and using IgG (LF-124; [23]) against the amino half of rhOPN ending at the RS site. B) White arrows denote the uterine-placental interface. Refer to Figure 4 for an example of representative background staining for the rabbit IgG control. Car, Caruncle; Cot, cotyledon; PL, placenta; ST, uterine stroma. Width of each field is 940 µm

OPN protein in endometrial glands In agreement with in situ hybridization results, immunoreactive OPN protein (LF-123 antibody) was present in the endometrial GE of all ewes between Days 20 and 120 of pregnancy (Fig. 4).



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. OPN protein expression in ovine endometrial GE from a Day 100 pregnant ewe. The uterine cross-section shown represents Days 20 through 120 of pregnancy, because the staining pattern did not differ as a result of the day of pregnancy. The OPN was detected using immunofluorescence staining of frozen sections. Compare the absence of antibody staining in Day 100 endometrium when rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) was used to detect immunoreactive proteins. V, Vasculature. Width of each field is 940 µm

OPN protein at the uterine-placental interface Immunolocalization of OPN protein by immunofluorescence staining of serial cross-sections from Days 14 through 120 of pregnancy with LF-123 and LF-124 antibodies is illustrated in Figure 5B. Previous studies have established that LF-124 antibody detects a 45-kDa OPN cleavage product that contains the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) integrin-binding sequence and is secreted into the uterine lumen of ewes during early pregnancy, whereas LF-123 antibody does not detect 45-kDa OPN [6]. Both antibodies immunoreact with native 70-kDa OPN in immunofluorescence staining. Importantly, however, clear differences exist in the endometrial distribution of native 70-kDa OPN and the secreted 45-kDa fragment, which is exclusively, continuously, and abundantly present along the apical surface of LE, on trophectoderm, and along the entire uterine-placental interface of both interplacentomal and placentomal regions through Day 120 of pregnancy (Fig. 5B). As previously reported [24], OPN protein is also expressed in uterine stroma between Days 30 and 120 of pregnancy (Fig. 5B). Stromal OPN is detectable with either the LF-123 or LF-124 antibody, indicating expression of native 70-kDa OPN.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Results of the present study are the first, to our knowledge, to demonstrate that OPN is present at all sites of intimate contact between conceptus and maternal tissues between Days 30 and 120 of pregnancy in sheep. Furthermore, the results strongly suggest that OPN protein is synthesized and secreted from the GE as a constituent of histotroph that specifically binds to the uterine-placental interface throughout gestation in sheep. These findings are significant, because they definitively localize a secretory product of the GE to regions of contact between conceptus and uterus where OPN can potentially influence fetal/placental development and growth and mediate communication between placental and uterine tissues to support pregnancy.

Steady-state levels of total endometrial OPN mRNA increased approximately 30-fold between Days 40 and 80 of gestation. Although increases in total OPN mRNA in the sheep are confounded by a complex temporal and spatial pattern of expression that includes both an increase in OPN gene expression in stratum compactum stroma that begins between Days 20 and 25 of pregnancy [24] as well as constitutive expression within the GE, even a perfunctory examination of mRNA localization (Fig. 3) clearly indicates that the major source of OPN is GE. This is readily seen by comparing the relative magnitude of hybridization between stroma and GE on Days 80 and 100 of pregnancy.

Changes in OPN mRNA correlate with growth of endometrial glands that occurs as the uterus remodels to accommodate rapid conceptus development and growth during the last two-thirds of pregnancy [25]. During ovine gestation, GE undergoes hyperplasia through Day 50, followed by hypertrophy and maximal production of histotroph after Day 60 [26]. A similar correlation between GE development and gene expression during pregnancy has been shown for the well-defined secretory product of GE, uterine milk protein (UTMP) [26]. Endometrial gland morphogenesis and, by inference, increases in GE gene products, such as OPN and UTMP, likely are influenced by sequential uterine exposure to estrogen, progesterone, interferon-tau, placental lactogen, and placental growth hormone [27, 28]. Using an ovariectomized ewe model, administration of progesterone increased GE expression of OPN and UTMP [2127], and injection of a progesterone-receptor antagonist prevented progesterone effects on OPN mRNA [21]. Furthermore, intrauterine infusion of placental lactogen to progesterone-treated ovariectomized ewes increased OPN and UTMP levels over those with progesterone alone [27, 28]. Interestingly, regulation of OPN and UTMP genes diverge in regard to exposure to growth hormone. Whereas infusion of growth hormone into progesterone-treated ovariectomized ewes increased GE expression of UTMP mRNA, OPN mRNA was not affected [27, 28]. It is important to note that sequential treatment of ovariectomized ewes with progesterone, interferon-tau, placental lactogen, and growth hormone resulted in GE development similar to that observed under the influence of placental lactogen from the placenta during pregnancy[28].

The differential staining observed when serial cross-sections were immunolabeled with LF-123 and LF-124 antibodies provides significant insights regarding the mechanistic role of OPN during pregnancy. These antibodies were generated against the amino (LF-124) and carboxyl (LF-123) terminal fragments of recombinant human OPN that form when the native 70-kDa protein is cleaved by thrombin at its RS sequence [23]. Both immunoglobulins detect the native 70-kDa OPN, but only the LF-124 antibody recognizes the 45-kDa cleavage fragment that contains the integrin-binding RGD sequence and has increased cell attachment and spreading properties through increased accessibility of the RGD to integrin receptors [20]. Only the 45-kDa OPN supports {alpha}9ß1- and {alpha}4ß1-mediated cell migration and adhesion [29, 30] as well as attachment through several other non-RGD sites [31]. This fragment is the predominant form of OPN in uterine flushes from pregnant ewes [5, 6]. The 45-kDa OPN fragment is clearly present at the apical surface of uterine LE on Day 14 of pregnancy, on Day 20 conceptus trophectoderm, and along the entire uterine-placental interface of both placentomal and interplacentomal regions through Day 120 of gestation. Because OPN mRNA is synthesized by GE, but not by LE or conceptus, immunodetection of 45-kDa OPN protein at these locations confirms that OPN is secreted by GE and binds to all sites of direct attachment between conceptus and uterus. The source of OPN protein that localizes at the interface between caruncular epithelium and chorion likely is OPN secreted from neighboring GE in the intercaruncular endometrium. However, stromal and immune cells of placentomes express OPN, which may be transported to the interface between caruncular epithelium and chorion [24, 32].

Implantation/placentation is a progressive process involving adhesion molecule-dependent remodeling of endometrium and conceptus trophectoderm. Recently, OPN and its integrin receptors have become the focus of studies concerning adhesion for implantation. Lessey et al. [33] have established that transient endometrial expression of {alpha}vß3 and {alpha}4ß1 integrins is cycle-dependent and defines the implantation window in women. Altered expression of these integrins is correlated with several causes of infertility [34]. Null mutations of {alpha}v, {alpha}5, ß1, or ß5 integrin genes in mice lead to peri-implantation lethality and failure of chorion-allantois fusion [35], whereas functional blockade of {alpha}v and ß3 integrins in mice reduces the number of implantation sites [36]. Endometrial integrin expression has also been reported in several species that exhibit noninvasive implantation, including the sheep, pig, goat, and cow [6, 7, 3739]. Uterine, placental, and/or conceptus expression of OPN has been demonstrated in cows, pigs, mice, baboons, humans, and sheep. Preliminary studies in cows suggest that OPN protein is localized to the apical surface of GE, to stroma, and on trophectoderm cells of midpregnancy cows [40]. In pigs, OPN mRNA is synthesized in discrete regions of the uterine LE between Days 12 and 15 of pregnancy, is present throughout the entire LE thereafter, and appears in GE by Day 30 [41]. In the mouse, OPN is transcribed by trophectoderm, metrial gland cells of decidua, and placenta [42], whereas OPN protein is found in GE and decidualized stroma of baboons [43]. In women, high levels of OPN mRNA were first localized by Young et al. [10] to decidual stromal cells as well as endometrial glands of nonpregnant secretory uterus. The OPN transcript was later detected in hypersecretory endometrial GE of pregnant women [11, 44]. Omigbodun et al. [45] subsequently determined that progesterone increased OPN protein on cytotrophoblasts of the chorionic villus, but not syncytial trophoblasts, and concluded that OPN mediates adhesive and/or signaling events between these trophoblast cell types via {alpha}v integrins. Importantly, endometrial expression of OPN is increased by progesterone during the menstrual cycle, starting on Days 16–17, and secretory GE appears to be the source of OPN protein that is localized on the apical LE [19, 44].

In sheep, OPN is a component of histotroph that increases in uterine flushings from pregnant ewes between Days 11 and 17 [6]. Exposure to progesterone induces OPN mRNA expression only in endometrial GE, but OPN protein is present on the apical aspect of the endometrial LE and trophectoderm [5, 6, 21]. Indeed, OPN has been proposed to bridge integrin receptors expressed by trophectoderm and uterus to induce adhesion between LE and trophectoderm essential for initial conceptus attachment in sheep and humans [6, 7, 44, 46]. Two recent reports using high-density microarray screening of human endometrium during the receptive phase for implantation have confirmed that OPN increases markedly during the window of implantation. A comparison of gene expression between endometrium from Days 8 to 10 of the cycle with Days 8–10 postmidluteal LH surge showed an 8.1-fold increase in OPN mRNA [47]. Similarly, microarray comparison of endometrium from Days 2 to 4 with Days 7 to 9 post-LH surge showed a 12.3-fold up-regulation [48]. Results from the present study support the results from studies of pigs [41] and cows [40] and firmly establish that glandular OPN continues to have a role in maternal-fetal interactions well beyond the receptive phase for implantation. The role of OPN at the uterine-placental interface is not clear, but this ECM protein has potential to mediate adhesion, remodeling, and cell-cell/cell-ECM communication at sites of contact between maternal- and fetal-derived tissues. The presence of the highly adhesive [20] and flexible [49] 45-kDa OPN cleavage fragment containing multiple binding sequences for interaction with different proteins [50] and capable of multimer formation [46] supports the hypothesis that OPN continues to serve as an adhesive ligand that bridges receptors on uterus and placenta throughout gestation. However, other roles for OPN are possible. For example, OPN fragments are known to initiate cell proliferation and migration [51] and may be involved in cytoskeletal reorganization for placentation. In addition, ECM proteins, such as OPN, can bind integrins to promote survival in cells that would otherwise undergo apoptosis [52], and OPN sequesters Factor-H, a plasma protein that binds and inactivates complement pathway components, to the cell surface and inhibits complement-mediated cell lysis [53]. Interestingly, both OPN and another endometrial secretory protein, decay-accelerating factor, which functions in a similar way to inhibit complement-mediated cell lysis, exhibit comparable temporal and spatial increases of expression in the peri-implantation human endometrium [54]. Therefore, OPN may serve to stabilize cells at the uterine-placental interface.

Collectively, OPN mRNA and protein localization in the present study confirm that OPN is a component of ovine histotroph that binds to the uterine-placental interface, where it could have profound influence throughout gestation. Experiments that address physiological, cellular, and molecular mechanisms involved in OPN-mediated attachment, proliferation, migration, and signal transduction using in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models are warranted to define the role of OPN during pregnancy.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Dr. Larry W. Fisher of the National Institutes of Health for rabbit polyclonal antibodies LF-123 and LF-124 to recombinant human OPN.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 The microscopy and imaging facilities in the College of Veterinary Medicine Image Analysis Laboratory are supported, in part, by NIH grant P30 ES 09106. Back

2 Correspondence: Greg A. Johnson, Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4458. FAX: 979 845 7249; gjohnson{at}cvm.tamu.edu Back

Received: 20 November 2002.

First decision: 18 December 2002.

Accepted: 27 December 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Martal J, Chene N, Camous S, Huynh L, Lantier F, Hermier P, L'Haridon R, Charpigny G, Charlier M, Chaouat G. Recent developments and potentialities for reducing embryo mortality in ruminants: the role of IFN-tau and other cytokines in early pregnancy. Reprod Fertil Dev 1997 9:355-380[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Roberts RM, Bazer FW. The functions of uterine secretions. J Reprod Fertil 1988 82:875-892[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Burton GJ, Watson AL, Hempstock J, Skepper JN, Jauniaux E. Uterine glands provide histotrophic nutrition for the human fetus during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002 87:2954-2959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gray CA, Taylor KM, Ramsey WS, Hill J, Bazer FW, Bartol FF, Spencer TE. Endometrial glands are required for pre-implantation conceptus elongation and survival. Biol Reprod 2001 64:1608-1613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW. Ovine osteopontin: I. Cloning and expression of mRNA in the uterus during the peri-implantation period. Biol Reprod 1999 61:884-891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Spencer TE, Newton GR, Ott TL, Bazer FW. Ovine osteopontin: II. Osteopontin and {alpha}vß3 integrin expression in the uterus and conceptus during the peri-implantation period. Biol Reprod 1999 61:892-899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Jaeger LA, Ka H, Garlow JE, Pfarrer C, Spencer TE, Burghardt RC. Muc-1, integrin and osteopontin expression during the implantation cascade in sheep. Biol Reprod 2001 65:820-828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gray CA, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Evidence that absence of endometrial gland secretions in uterine gland knockout ewes compromises conceptus survival and elongation. Reproduction 2002 124:289-300[Abstract]
  9. Denhardt DT, Guo X. Osteopontin: a protein with diverse functions. FASEB J 1993 7:1475-1483[Abstract]
  10. Young MF, Kerr JM, Termine JD, Wewer UM, Wang MG, McBride OW, Fisher LW. cDNA cloning, mRNA distribution and heterogeneity, chromosomal location, and RFLP analysis of human osteopontin (OPN). Genomics 1990 7:491-502[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Brown LF, Berse B, Van de Water L, Papadopuolos-Sergiou A, Perruzzi CA, Manseau EJ, Dvorak HF, Senger DR. Expression and distribution of osteopontin in human tissues: widespread association with luminal epithelial surfaces. Mol Bio Cell 1992 3:1169-1180[Abstract]
  12. Kohri K, Nomura S, Kitamura Y, Nagata T, Yoshioka K, Iguchi M, Yamate T, Umekawa T, Suzuki Y, Sinohara H. Structure and expression of the mRNA encoding urinary stone protein (osteopontin). J Biol Chem 1993 268:15180-15184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Daiter E, Omigbodun A, Wang S, Walinsky D, Strauss JF III, Hoyer JR, Coutifaris C. Cell differentiation and endogenous cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate regulate osteopontin expression in human trophoblasts. Endocrinology 1996 137:1785-1790[Abstract]
  14. Luedtke CC, McKee MD, Cyr DG, Gregory M, Kaartinen MT, Mui J, Hermo L. Osteopontin expression and regulation in the testis, efferent ducts, and epididymis of rats during postnatal development through to adulthood. Biol Reprod 2002 66:1437-1448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Fresno M, McVay-Boudreau L, Nabel G, Cantor H. Antigen-specific T-lymphocyte clones. II. Purification and biological characterization of an antigen-specific suppressive protein synthesized by cloned T-cells. J Exp Med 1981 153:1260-1274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Miyauchi A, Alvarez J, Greenfield EM, Teti A, Grano M, Colucci S, Zambonin-Zallone A, Ross FP, Teitelbaum SM, Cheresh D, Hruska KA. Recognition of osteopontin and related peptides by an {alpha}vß3 integrin stimulates immediate cell signals in osteoclasts. J Biol Chem 1991 266:20369-20374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Weber GF, Ashkar S, Glimcher MJ, Cantor H. Receptor-ligand interaction between CD44 and osteopontin (Eta-1). Science 1996 271:509-512[Abstract]
  18. Liaw L, Skinner MP, Raines EW, Ross R, Cheresh DA, Schwartz SM, Ciachelli CM. The adhesive and migratory effects of osteopontin are mediated via distinct cell surface integrins. J Clin Invest 1995 95:713-724
  19. Apparao KB, Murray MJ, Fritz MA, Meyer WR, Chanbers AF, Truong PR, Lessey BA. Osteopontin and its receptor {alpha}vß3 integrin are coexpressed in the human endometrium during the menstrual cycle but regulated differentially. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001 86:4991-5000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Senger DR, Perruzzi CA. Cell migration promoted by a potent GRGDS-containing thrombin-cleavage fragment of osteopontin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1996 1314:13-24[Medline]
  21. Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Burghardt RC, Taylor KM, Gray CA, Bazer FW. Progesterone modulation of osteopontin gene expression in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 2000 62:1315-1321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Spencer TE, Ing NH, Ott TL, Mayes JS, Becker WC, Watson GH, Mirando MA, Bazer FW. Intrauterine injection of ovine interferon-tau alters oestrogen receptor and oxytocin receptor expression in the endometrium of cyclic ewes. J Mol Endocrinol 1995 15:203-220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Fisher LW, Stubbs JT III, Young MF. Antisera and cDNA probes to human and certain animal model bone matrix noncollagenous proteins. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1995 266:61-65[Medline]
  24. Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Joyce MM, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, Pfarrer C, Gray CA. Osteopontin expression in uterine stroma indicates a decidualization-like differentiation during ovine pregnancy. Biol Reprod 2003 68:1951-1958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Wimsatt WA. New histological observations on the placenta of the sheep. Am J Anat 1950 87:391-436[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Stewart MD, Johnson GA, Gray CA, Burghardt RC, Schuler LA, Joyce MM, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Prolactin receptor and uterine milk protein expression in the ovine endometrium during the estrous cycle and pregnancy. Biol Reprod 2000 62:1779-1789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Spencer TE, Gray CA, Johnson GA, Taylor KM, Gertler A, Gootwine E, Ott TL, Bazer FW. Effects of recombinant ovine interferon tau, placental lactogen and growth hormone on the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 1999 61:1409-1418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Noel S, Herman A, Johnson GA, Gray CA, Stewart MD, Bazer FW, Gertler A, Spencer TE. Ovine placental lactogen binds endometrial glands in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 2003 68:772-780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Bayless KJ, Davis GE. Identification of dual {alpha}4ß1 integrin binding sites within a 38 amino acid domain in the N-terminal thrombin fragment of human osteopontin. J Biol Chem 2001 276:13483-13489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Smith LL, Giachelli CM. Structural requirements for {alpha}9ß1-mediated adhesion and migration to thrombin-cleaved osteopontin. Exp Cell Res 1998 242:351-360[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Katagiri YU, Murakami M, Mori K, Iizuka J, Hara T, Tanaka K, Jia WY, Chambers AF, Uede T. Non-RGD domains of osteopontin promote cell adhesion without involving {alpha}v integrins. J Cell Biochem 1996 62:123-131[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Johnson GA, Joyce MM, Burghardt RC. Osteopontin/early T-cell activation factor-1 is expressed by fetal placental immune cells after day 20 of pregnancy in sheep but not pigs. Biol Reprod 2002 66:suppl 1431 (abstract)
  33. Lessey BA, Castelbaum AJ, Buck CA, Lei Y, Yowell CW, Sun J. Further characterization of endometrial integrins during the menstrual cycle and in pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1994 62:497-506[Medline]
  34. Lessey BA, Castelbaum AJ, Sawin SW, Sun J. Integrins as markers of uterine receptivity in women with primary unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 1995 63:535-542[Medline]
  35. Hynes RO. Targeted mutations in cell adhesion genes: what have we learned from them?. Dev Biol 1996 180:402-412[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Illera MJ, Cullinan E, Gui Y, Yuan L, Beyler SA, Lessey BA. Blockade of the {alpha}vß3 integrin adversely affects implantation in the mouse. Biol Reprod 2000 62:1285-1290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Bowen JA, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC. Spatial and temporal analyses of integrin and Muc-1 expression in porcine uterine epithelium and trophectoderm in vivo. Biol Reprod 1996 55:1098-1106[Abstract]
  38. Guillomot M. Changes in extracellular matrix components and cytokeratins in the endometrium during goat implantation. Placenta 1999 20:339-345[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. MacIntyre DM, Lim HC, Ryan K, Kimmins S, Small JA, MacLaren LA. Implantation-associated changes in bovine uterine expression of integrins and extracellular matrix. Biol Reprod 2002 66:1430-1436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Pfarrer C, Hallack S, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW, Leiser R. Expression of osteopontin in bovine placentomes and interplacentomal areas from early placentation until term. Biol Reprod 2002 66:suppl 1229 (abstract)
  41. Garlow JE, Ka H, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Jaeger LA, Bazer FW. Analysis of osteopontin at the maternal-placental interface in pigs. Biol Reprod 2002 66:718-725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Nomura S, Wills AJ, Edwards DR, Heath JK, Hogan BLM. Developmental expression of 2ar (osteopontin) and SPARC (osteonectin) RNA as revealed by in situ hybridization. J Cell Biol 1988 106:441-450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Fazleabas AT, Bell SC, Fleming S, Sun J, Lessey BA. Distribution of integrins and the extracellular matrix proteins in the baboon endometrium during the menstrual cycle and early pregnancy. Biol Reprod 1997 56:348-356[Abstract]
  44. Coutifaris C, Ziolkiewicz P, Omigbodun A, Harper J. Osteopontin in human endometrium: a role for this secretory protein in uterine receptivity and embryo implantation. In: Serono Symposia USA. International Symposium on Embryo Implantation: Molecular, Cellular and Clinical Aspects; 1997:14 (abstract)
  45. Omigbodun A, Ziolkiewicz P, Tessler C, Hoyer JR, Coutifaris C. Progesterone regulates osteopontin expression in human trophoblasts: a model of paracrine control in the placenta. Endocrinology 1997 138:4308-4315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Kaartinen MT, Pirhonen A, Linnala-Kankkunen A, Maenpaa PH. Cross-linking of osteopontin by tissue transglutaminase increases its collagen binding properties. J Biol Chem 1999 274:1729-1735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Kao LC, Tulac S, Lobo S, Imani B, Yang JP, Germeyer A, Osteen K, Taylor RN, Lessey BA, Giudice LC. Global gene profiling in human endometrium during the window of implantation. Endocrinology 2002 143:2119-2138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Carson DD, Lagow E, Thathiah A, Al-Shami R, Farach-Carson MC, Vernon M, Yuan L, Fritz MA, Lessey B. Changes in gene expression during the early to mid-luteal (receptive phase) transition in human endometrium detected by high-density microarray screening. Mol Human Reprod 2002 8:871-879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Fisher LW, Torchia DA, Fohr B, Young MF, Fedarko NS. Flexible structures of SIBLING proteins, bone sialoprotein, and osteopontin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001 280:460-465[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Davis GE, Bayless KJ. Matricryptic integrin binding sites in osteopontin regulate inflammation. Third International Conference on Osteopontin and Related Proteins (ICORP). The Scientific World Publications 2002; 17–18
  51. Agnihotri R, Crawford HC, Haro H, Matrisian LM, Havrda MC, Liaw L. Osteopontin, a novel substrate for matrix metalloproteinase-3 (stromelysin-1) and matrix metalloproteinase-7 (matrilysin). J Biol Chem 2001 276:28261-28267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Stupack DG, Cheresh DA. Get a ligand, get a life: integrins, signaling and cell survival. J Cell Sci 2002 115:3729-3738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Fedarko NS, Fohr B, Robey PG, Young MF, Fisher LW. Factor H binding to bone sialoprotein and osteopontin enables tumor cell evasion of complement-mediated attack. J Biol Chem 2000 275:16666-16672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Young SL, Lessey BA, Fritz MA, Meyer WR, Murray MJ, Speckman PL, Nowicki BJ. In vivo and in vitro evidence suggests that HB-EGF regulates endometrial expression of human decay-accelerating factor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002 87:1368-1375[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R. C Burghardt, J. R Burghardt, J. D Taylor II, A. T Reeder, B. T Nguen, T. E Spencer, K. J Bayless, and G. A Johnson
Enhanced focal adhesion assembly reflects increased mechanosensation and mechanotransduction at maternal-conceptus interface and uterine wall during ovine pregnancy
Reproduction, March 1, 2009; 137(3): 567 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. A. Dunlap, D. W. Erikson, R. C. Burghardt, F. J. White, K. M. Reed, J. L. Farmer, T. E. Spencer, R. R. Magness, F. W. Bazer, K. J. Bayless, et al.
Progesterone and Placentation Increase Secreted Phosphoprotein One (SPP1 or Osteopontin) in Uterine Glands and Stroma for Histotrophic and Hematotrophic Support of Ovine Pregnancy
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2008; 79(5): 983 - 990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. Song, M. C. Satterfield, J. Kim, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Gastrin-Releasing Peptide (GRP) in the Ovine Uterus: Regulation by Interferon Tau and Progesterone
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 376 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
F. J White, R. C Burghardt, J. Hu, M. M Joyce, T. E Spencer, and G. A Johnson
Secreted phosphoprotein 1 (osteopontin) is expressed by stromal macrophages in cyclic and pregnant endometrium of mice, but is induced by estrogen in luminal epithelium during conceptus attachment for implantation.
Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 919 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. Song, F. W. Bazer, G. F. Wagner, and T. E. Spencer
Stanniocalcin (STC) in the Endometrial Glands of the Ovine Uterus: Regulation by Progesterone and Placental Hormones
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2006; 74(5): 913 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
F. J. White, J. W. Ross, M. M. Joyce, R. D. Geisert, R. C. Burghardt, and G. A. Johnson
Steroid Regulation of Cell Specific Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 (Osteopontin) Expression in the Pregnant Porcine Uterus
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2005; 73(6): 1294 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Song, T. E. Spencer, and F. W. Bazer
Cathepsins in the Ovine Uterus: Regulation by Pregnancy, Progesterone, and Interferon Tau
Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 4825 - 4833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. E Spencer, G. A Johnson, F. W Bazer, and R. C Burghardt
Implantation mechanisms: insights from the sheep
Reproduction, December 1, 2004; 128(6): 657 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. E. Spencer, G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, and F. W. Bazer
Progesterone and Placental Hormone Actions on the Uterus: Insights from Domestic Animals
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 2 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Osteopontin: Roles in Implantation and Placentation
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2003; 69(5): 1458 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/1/92    most recent
biolreprod.102.013573v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pfarrer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pfarrer, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pfarrer, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS