Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print May 14, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.016337
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/3/851    most recent
biolreprod.103.016337v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, T. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, T. E.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 69, 851–860 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.016337
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Female Reproductive Tract

Ovarian Regulation of Endometrial Gland Morphogenesis and Activin-Follistatin System in the Neonatal Ovine Uterus1

Karen D. Carpenter3, Kanako Hayashi3, and Thomas E. Spencer2

Center for Animal Biotechnology and Genomics, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2471


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Postnatal development of the ovine uterus between birth and Postnatal Day (PND) 56 involves differentiation of the endometrial glandular epithelium from the luminal epithelium followed by tubulogenesis and branching morphogenesis. Previous results indicated that ovariectomy of ewes at birth did not affect uterine growth or initial stages of endometrial gland genesis on PND 14 but did affect uterine growth after PND 28. Available evidence from a number of species supports the hypothesis that the ovary does not affect endometrial gland morphogenesis in the postnatal uterus. To test this hypothesis in our sheep model, ewes were assigned at birth to a sham surgery as a control or bilateral ovariectomy (OVX) on PND 7. Uteri were removed and weighed on PND 56. Ovariectomy did not affect circulating levels of estradiol-17ß. Uterine weight was 52% lower in OVX ewes. Histomorphological analyses indicated that the thickness of the endometrium and myometrium, total number of endometrial glands, and endometrial gland density in the stratum spongiosum stroma was reduced in uteri of OVX ewes. In contrast, the number of superficial ductal gland invaginations and gland density in the stratum compactum stroma was not affected by ovariectomy. The uteri of OVX ewes contained lower levels of ßA subunit, activin receptor (ActR) type IA, ActRIB, and follistatin protein expression but higher levels of ßB subunit. In the neonatal ovary, follistatin, inhibin {alpha} subunit, ßA subunit, and ßB subunit were expressed in antral follicles between PNDs 0 and 56. These results led to rejection of the hypothesis that the ovary does not influence endometrial adenogenesis. Rather, the ovary and, thus, an ovarian-derived factor regulates, in part, the coiling and branching morphogenetic stage of endometrial gland development after PND 14 and expression of specific components of the activin-follistatin system in the neonatal ovine uterus that appear to be important for that critical process.

activitin, follistatin, inhibin, ovary, uterus


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Uterine adenogenesis in the ewe begins after birth and involves the emergence, proliferation, and differentiation of endometrial glands as well as the specification of intercaruncular stroma, development of endometrial folds, and to a lesser extent, growth of endometrial caruncular areas and myometrium [16]. Uterine gland development or adenogenesis is initiated between Postnatal Day (PND) 1 and PND 7, when shallow epithelial invaginations appear along the endometrial luminal epithelium (LE) in presumptive intercaruncular areas. Between PNDs 7 and 14, the nascent glandular epithelium (GE) buds proliferate, grow into the stroma, and form tubules or ducts that begin to coil and branch at the tips by PND 21. After PND 14, endometrial adenogenesis primarily involves coiling and branching morphogenetic growth of tubular endometrial glands from the upper stroma (e.g., stratum compactum) underneath the LE into the lower stroma (e.g., stratum spongiosum) adjacent to the inner circular layer of the myometrium. By PND 56, uterine morphogenesis is essentially complete, because the aglandular caruncular and glandular intercaruncular endometrial areas appear to be similar histoarchitecturally to those of the adult uterus [3].

Jost [7] first established, based on results from studies of rabbits, the concept that prenatal urogenital tract development in female mammals is an ovary-independent event. Since then, studies of several species have revealed that uterine development and endometrial adenogenesis can proceed normally in the absence of the ovary and, by default, ovarian steroids for varying periods of time during early postnatal life. In the prepubertal ewe, the ovary contains growing and antral ovarian follicles at birth that decline to PND 14, increase and peak in number on PND 28, remain high from PNDs 42 to 56, and then decline thereafter [8, 9]. These changes in ovarian follicles correlate with the ontogeny of endometrial gland development in the ewe lamb [3]. However, ovariectomy of the ewe at birth does not affect uterine wet weight [9] or the initial stages of endometrial gland tubulogenesis [10] on PND 14, but it does affect uterine growth after PND 14 [11]. Postnatal uterine growth and endometrial adenogenesis are ovary- and steroid-independent in rodents [1214] and pigs [15]. Similarly, recent results indicate that postnatal uterine growth and endometrial adenogenesis are estrogen-independent from birth to PND 56, although coiling and branching morphogenesis after PND 14 is, in part, dependent on activated estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) [16]. Although the ovary plays a role in postnatal uterine growth, to our knowledge the role of the ovary in endometrial gland development after PND 14 has not been investigated in the ewe.

Recent results from studies of the neonatal ovine uterus implicate follistatin, activins, and activin receptors as autocrine and paracrine regulators of endometrial gland morphogenesis [17]. Activins and inhibins are members of the transforming growth factor (TGF) ß superfamily and regulate growth and differentiation of many branched epitheliomesenchymal organs via autocrine, paracrine, and perhaps, endocrine mechanisms [1824]. Activins and inhibins are dimeric proteins (for review, see [25, 26]). Activin consists of two ß subunits, ßA and ßB, that homodimerize or heterodimerize to form activin A (ßA:ßA), activin B (ßB:ßB), or activin AB (ßA:ßB). Inhibin consists of an {alpha} subunit that heterodimerizes with a ß subunit to form either inhibin A ({alpha}:ßA) or inhibin B ({alpha}:ßB). The biological activity of activins is mediated by receptor complexes consisting of activin receptor (ActR) type IA or ActRIB and ActRII. One of the key features that distinguish the effects of activins from those of TGFß is that binding of activins to their receptors can be blocked if activin binds to follistatin or if inhibin {alpha} subunit binds to ActRs [2729]. Follistatin binds to activins with high affinity and neutralizes their activity [3032]. Inhibin {alpha} subunit, activins, and follistatin are synthesized and secreted by ovarian follicles in the neonate and the adult [25, 26, 3336]. Therefore, these ovarian factors could act in an endocrine manner to regulate uterine growth and endometrial adenogenesis via the activin-follistatin system to complement endocrine and paracrine effects of the activin-follistatin system in the neonatal ovine uterus.

Available evidence from the ewe and other domestic and laboratory animals supports the working hypothesis that endometrial adenogenesis is not regulated by the ovary and, thus, ovarian factors. To test this hypothesis, studies were conducted to determine the following: 1) the effects of removing the ovary at PND 7 on subsequent uterine growth and endometrial adenogenesis at PND 56, 2) the effects of ovariectomy on the activin-follistatin system in the uterus, and 3) the expression of the activin-follistatin system in the neonatal ovary.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Experimental Design

All experiments and surgical procedures were in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Agriculture Animals and approved by the University Laboratory Animal Care Committee of Texas A&M University. Cross-bred Suffolk ewes were mated to Suffolk rams between the months of September and November 2001. Pregnant ewes were maintained according to normal husbandry practices. Ewes in the following experiments were born between the months of February and March 2002. In study 1, ewes were assigned randomly at birth (PND 0) to undergo either a sham surgery as a control (CX) or bilateral ovariectomy (OVX) on PND 7 (n = 6 per treatment). Beginning on PND 0, blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture every 7 days into Vacutainer tubes (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). On PND 56, all ewe lambs were weighed and necropsied. The uterus was obtained; trimmed free of the broad ligament, oviduct, and cervix; and weighed. Sections (thickness, ~1 cm) from the midportion of each uterine horn were fixed in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 24 h and processed for histology. The remainder of the uterus was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. In study 2, ovaries were obtained from ewes (n = 45) on PNDs 0 (n = 6), 7 (n = 4), 14 (n = 5), 21 (n = 5), 28 (n = 5), 35 (n = 5), 42 (n = 5), 49 (n = 5), or 56 (n = 5) as described previously [17].

Radioimmunoassay

Blood samples were allowed to clot for 1 h at room temperature. Serum was then separated by centrifugation (3000 x g for 30 min at 4°C), removed, and stored at -20°C.

Concentrations of estradiol-17ß (E2) in plasma were determined using methods described previously [3]. Assay sensitivity was 3 pg/ml, and the intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 5% and 12%, respectively. Assay results were calculated using the AssayZap Version 3.1 program (Biosoft, Ferguson, CA).

Histology and Morphometry

After fixation, uteri or ovaries were changed to 70% ethanol for 24 h and then dehydrated and embedded in Paraplast Plus (Oxford Labware, St. Louis, MO). Uteri from study 1 were sectioned (thickness, 5 µm) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin as described previously [2]. Sections (n = 4) of the uterus from each ewe were photomicrographed, and images were analyzed using Scion Image software (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD) as described previously [37]. Measurements were standardized using the image of a stage micrometer at the same magnification. The number of superficial ductal invaginations of GE from the LE into the stroma was determined. Endometrial gland number was determined by counting the total number of uterine glands in a complete cross-section of the uterine horn. The observation of a gland cross-section with a visible open lumen was counted as a single gland. Endometrial gland density was determined by counting the number of glands in a 200 µm2 area in the stratum compactum and stratum spongiosum areas of the intercaruncular endometrium. The number of ductal gland invaginations, endometrial gland number, and gland density estimates were generated for at least three areas within four nonsequential sections from each uterine horn. Intra- and intersection repeatability estimates for determination of ductal gland invaginations and endometrial gland number by a single observer were 0.85 and 0.8, respectively. The thickness or width of the endometrium and myometrium (inner circular and outer longitudinal layers) in the intercaruncular endometrial areas was measured using the Scion Image software from multiple points (n = 3–4) of at least 10 nonsequential uterine sections. Ovaries from study 2 were sectioned (thickness, 5 µm) and stained with Masson trichrome as described previously [38].

Semiquantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction

Expression of mRNAs for ßA subunit, ßB subunit, ActRIA, ActRIB, ActRII, and follistatin was assessed in uterine total RNA using semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with methods [4, 5] and primers [17] as described previously [4, 5]. Total cellular RNA was isolated from frozen uteri using Trizol (Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY) according to manufacturer's recommendations. Briefly, cDNA was synthesized from total cellular RNA (5 µg) isolated from neonatal uteri using random (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) and oligo-dT primers and SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies). Newly synthesized cDNA was acid-ethanol precipitated, resuspended in 20 µl of water, and stored at -20°C. The cDNAs were diluted (1:1 or 1:10) with water before use in PCR. Primers were designed to amplify partial cDNAs for ovine follistatin, ßA subunit, ßB subunit, ActRIA, and ActRII as described previously [17]. ß-Actin primers were ATGAAGATCCTCACGGAACG (forward) and GAAGGTGGTCTCGTGAATGC (reverse), which amplified a 270-base pair product. The PCR reactions were performed using AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and Optimized Buffer D (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for ß-actin; Optimized Buffer E (Invitrogen) for ActRIB; Optimized Buffer F (Invitrogen) for follistatin, ActRIA, and ActRII; and Optimized Buffer J (Invitrogen) for ßA subunit and ßB subunit according to manufacturer's recommendations. The amount of cDNA template, annealing temperature, and number of cycles used for PCR were initially optimized to ensure that final PCR conditions were within the linear range of amplification for each primer pair. Follistatin and ßA subunit PCR reactions contained 1.5 µl of cDNA (1:10), ßB subunit reactions 2.5 µl of cDNA (1:1), ActRIA reactions 2 µl of cDNA (1:10), ActRIB reactions 2 µl of cDNA (1:1), ActRII reactions 3 µl of cDNA (1:10), and ß-actin reactions 1 µl of cDNA (1:10). All PCR reactions were performed at 95°C for 30 sec, 55–59°C for 1 min [17], and 72°C for 1 min. Cycle number was 25 for ß-actin; 27 for ActRII; 30 for follistatin, ßA subunit, and ActRIA; and 35 for ActRIB and ßB subunit. In negative-control reactions, RT cDNA was substituted by inclusion of uterine total RNA or water. Following PCR, equal amounts of reaction product were analyzed using a 2% agarose gel, and PCR products were visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The amount of DNA present was quantified by measuring the intensity of light emitted from correctly sized bands under ultraviolet light using an AlphaImager (Alpha Innotech Corporation, San Leandro, CA), and data are expressed as relative light units. All RT-PCR products were cloned into pCRII (Invitrogen) and fully sequenced in both directions to confirm identity.

In Situ Hybridization Analysis

Expression of mRNAs in the uterus (study 1) and ovary (study 2) was determined by in situ hybridization as described previously [39]. Briefly, deparaffinized, rehydrated, and deproteinated cross-sections (thickness, 5 µm) of the uterus (study 1) or ovaries (study 2) from each ewe were hybridized with radiolabeled sense or antisense cRNA probes generated from linearized plasmid templates containing partial cDNAs using in vitro transcription with [35S-{alpha}]UTP. Partial cDNAs for ovine inhibin {alpha} subunit, ßA subunit, ßB subunit, ActRIA, ActRII, and follistatin were generated by RT-PCR as described in the companion paper [17]. After hybridization, washing, and ribonuclease A digestion, slides were dipped in NTB-2 liquid photographic emulsion (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY), stored at 4°C for 2–28 days, and developed in Kodak D-19 developer. Slides were then counterstained with Gills modified hematoxylin (Stat Lab, Lewisville, TX), dehydrated through a graded series of alcohol to xylene, and protected with a coverslip. Images of representative fields in sections hybridized with antisense or sense cRNAs were recorded under bright- or dark-field illumination with a Nikon Eclipse 1000 photomicroscope (Nikon Instruments, Inc., Lewisville, TX) fitted with a Nikon DXM1200 digital camera using constant image acquisition parameters to ensure accurate comparison.

Immunohistochemistry

Expression of immunoreactive follistatin, inhibin {alpha} subunit, ßA subunit, ßB subunit, ActRIA, ActRIB, and/or ActRII were detected in cross-sections (thickness, 5 µm) of the uterus (study 1) or ovaries (study 2) from each ewe with specific antibodies and a Super ABC Mouse/Rat Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Kit (Biomeda, Foster City, CA) using methods and antibodies described previously [17]. Multiple tissue sections from each ewe were processed as sets within an experiment. Relative staining intensity for immunoreactive protein expression was assessed visually in sections of the uterus or ovary from each ewe by two independent observers and scored as follows: absent (-, i.e., no staining above that of the IgG control), weak (+), moderate (++), or strong (+++) [5]. The scores from the two observers were averaged. If histologically discernable in the uterus, intercaruncular endometrial tissues (including LE, stroma, and GE), caruncular endometrial tissues (including LE and stroma), and myometrium were scored. In the ovary, cumulus-oocyte complex (COC) cells, granulosa cells (GC), oocyte, and theca cells (TC) were scored. Images of representative fields of sections probed with primary antibodies or IgG were recorded using a Nikon Eclipse 1000 photomicroscope fitted with a Nikon DXM1200 digital camera using constant image acquisition parameters to ensure accurate comparisons.

Statistical Analyses

All quantitative data were subjected to least-squares ANOVA using general linear model procedures of the Statistical Analysis System [40]. Serum E2 levels were log transformed before least-squares regression analyses. Uterine wet-weight data were analyzed using body weight as a covariate. Histomorphometrical data were analyzed using an overall model that included main effects of treatment, day, treatment by day interaction, section, and area. In all analyses, error terms used in tests of significance were identified according to the expectation of the mean squares for error. The RT-PCR data were subjected to one-way ANOVA utilizing the ß-actin values as a covariate in the model to correct for differences in amounts of RT cDNA analyzed for each uterus. A probability (P) value of 0.10 or less was accepted as indicating significance. Data are presented as least-square means of untransformed values with overall SEMs.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Circulating Concentrations of E2 Are Unaffected by Ovariectomy

Circulating concentrations of E2 in plasma were low and affected by day (P < 0.10) but not by treatment (P > 0.10) or their interaction (P > 0.10). Serum E2 levels were highest on PND 0 (10 ± 1.5 pg/ml), declined to PND 7 (3 ± 1.5 pg/ml), and remained low to PND 56 (data not shown).

Ovariectomy Retards Uterine Growth and Endometrial Gland Morphogenesis

As summarized in Table 1, uterine wet weight was 52% lower (P < 0.01) in OVX compared to CX ewes on PND 56. The intercaruncular endometrium of CX ewes contained numerous coiled and branched glands extending radially from the LE through the stroma to the inner circular layer of myometrium (Fig. 1). In contrast, the intercaruncular endometrium of OVX ewes contained substantially lower numbers of coiled and branched endometrial glands.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Weights and histomorphometrical measurements of uteri from CX and OVX ewes on PND 56



View larger version (162K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Representative photomicrographs illustrating the histoarchitecture of uteri from CX and OVX ewes on PND 56. Tissues were prepared and stained using hematoxylin and eosin. M, Myometrium; S, stroma. Bar = 500 µm at low magnification and 50 µm at high magnification

These histological observations were confirmed by histomorphometrical analyses, and the results are summarized in Table 1. The total number of endometrial glands in the uterine wall was reduced (P < 0.0001) by 44% in ovariectomized ewe lambs. The number of gland invaginations from the LE and density of glands in the stratum compactum stroma adjacent to the LE were not affected (P > 0.10) by ovariectomy. However, density of glands in the stratum spongiosum stroma adjacent to the inner circular layer of myometrium was reduced (P < 0.001) by 22% in OVX ewes. In the intercaruncular endometrium, the thickness and width of the endometrium and the myometrium were reduced (P < 0.05) by 22% and 16%, respectively, in uteri of OVX ewes.

Expression of the Follistatin-Activin System in the Uterus Is Altered by Ovariectomy

Semiquantitative RT-PCR analyses were conducted using total RNA isolated from uteri of CX and OVX ewes to determine steady-state levels of activin-follistatin system components. The number of PCR cycles was optimized for each primer pair to ensure amplification within the linear range of detection, as representatively illustrated by follistatin (Fig. 2A). As shown in Figure 2B, each of the primer pairs used for RT-PCR amplified a single product of the expected size [17]. A partial cDNA for ActRIB was detected abundantly in total RNA isolated from the neonatal ovary, but at extremely low amounts in the neonatal ovine uterus (data not shown). The amplified products were sequenced to confirm identity (data not shown). As compared to mRNA levels in uteri of CX ewes (Table 2), uteri of OVX ewes had substantially lower levels of activin ßA subunit, ActRIA, ActRII, and follistatin on PND 56. In contrast, the level of activin ßB subunit mRNA was greater in uteri of OVX compared to CX ewes on PND 56.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of the mRNAs for the follistatin-activin system in total RNA isolated from uteri of CX and OVX neonatal ewes on PND 56. A) Representative analysis of the effects of cycle number on yield of follistatin cDNA. B) Expression of mRNAs for follistatin, ßA subunit, ßB subunit, ActRIA, ActRII, and ß-actin in the ovine uterus. The PCR products were separated in a 2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. Positions of the 100-base pair DNA marker (M) ladder are shown. Results of analyses of changes in band intensity because of treatment are summarized in Table 2


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. RT-PCR analysis of the activin-follistatin system in total RNA from uteri of CX and OVX ewes on PND 56

In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analyses were performed to localize expression of follistatin-activin system mRNAs and protein in the uteri from CX and OVX ewes (Figs. 3 and 4). Results of immunohistochemical analyses were quantified and are summarized in Table 3. Expression of inhibin {alpha} subunit mRNA or protein was not detected in the neonatal ovine uterus (data not shown). As compared to CX ewes, uteri of OVX ewes had lower levels of ßA subunit expression, particularly in the endometrial LE, GE, and myometrium (Fig. 3A and Table 3). In contrast, the expression of ßB subunit was more abundant in the endometrial LE and GE of OVX ewes (Fig. 3B). Follistatin mRNA and protein levels were lower in uteri of OVX ewes, particularly in the endometrial stroma and myometrium (Fig. 3C).



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Representative photomicrographs indicating the distribution of ßA subunit (A), ßB subunit (B), and follistatin (C) mRNA and protein in uteri from CX and OVX ewes on PND 56. In situ localization of mRNA in the uterus is presented in bright-field (left) and dark-field (middle) illuminations. Representative photomicrographs of immunohistochemical results are presented for the upper and lower portions of the uterine wall (right). As a negative control, mouse IgG (mIgG) was substituted for the primary antibody. M, Myometrium; S, stroma. Bar = 50 µm



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Representative photomicrographs depicting the distribution of ActRIA (A), ActRIB (B), and ActRII (C) expression in uteri from CX and OVX ewes on PND 56. For both ActRIA and ActRII, in situ localization of mRNA in the uterus is presented in bright-field (left) and dark-field (middle) illuminations; representative photomicrographs of immunohistochemical results are presented for the upper and lower portions of the uterine wall (right). As a negative control, mouse mIgG (mIgG) was substituted for the primary antibody. M, Myometrium; S, stroma. Bar = 50 µm


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Distribution and relative abundance of immunoreactive ßA subunit, ßB subunit, follistatin, ActRIA, Act RIB, and ActRII protein in uteri from CX and OVX ewe lambs.a

Overall, expression of ActRIA and ActRIB was lower in the uteri of OVX ewes (Fig. 4, A and B). Specifically, ActRIA and ActRIB protein levels were reduced in both the endometrial glands and myometrium of OVX compared to CX ewes (Table 3). The low abundance of ActRIB mRNA was below the detectable limits of the in situ hybridization procedure (data not shown). The mouse anti-human ActRII antibody detects both ActRIIA and ActRIIB (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN). Although ActRII mRNA expression was lower in uteri of OVX ewes, immunoreactive ActRIIA/B protein abundance was not different between uteri from CX and OVX ewes (Fig. 4C).

Expression of Activin-Follistatin System Components in the Neonatal Ovary

As expected [6], the number of growing and antral follicles in the neonatal ovine ovary declined from PND 0 to PND 7, increased after PND 7 to PND 14, peaked on PND 28, and remained high to PND 56 (Fig. 5). On PND 28 and thereafter, a number of the follicles exhibited signs of atresia, including rupture and disorganization of the TC and GC layers. As expected, no corpora lutea were observed in the ovaries.



View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Representative photomicrographs illustrating the histoarchitecture of the ovary between PNDs 0 and 49, which corresponds to the period of postnatal uterine development in lambs. Tissues were prepared and stained using Masson trichrome. F, Follicle; O, oocyte. Bar = 500 µm

In the ovaries, inhibin {alpha} subunit mRNA and protein were detected only in GC and cells of the COC (Fig. 6A). Overall, expression of inhibin {alpha} subunit mRNA and protein increased in antral and graafian follicles between PND 0 and PND 14 and remained abundant thereafter (Table 4). In the neonatal ovary, ßA subunit mRNA and protein were detected in GC, COC, and the oocyte, with low levels of protein in the TC (Fig. 6B). The ßB subunit mRNA and protein were detected in GC and COC (Fig. 6C). The most abundant levels of immunoreactive ßB subunit protein were in the zona pellucida of the oocyte. Follistatin mRNA and protein expression were detected predominantly in the GC and COC (Fig. 6D), but immunoreactive follistatin protein was also present in TC and tunica muscularis of blood vessels.



View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Representative photomicrographs indicate the distribution of inhibin {alpha} subunit (A), ßA subunit (B), ßB subunit (C), and follistatin (D) mRNA and protein in ovaries from ewes on PNDs 14, 28 and 56. In situ localization of mRNA is presented in bright-field (left) and dark-field (middle) illuminations. Immunoreactive protein was detected using mouse monoclonal antibody and a BioStain Super ABC kit. Irrelevant mouse IgG (mIgG) was substituted for primary antibodies as a negative control. O, Oocyte. Bar = 100 µm


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Distribution and relative abundance of immunoreactive {alpha} subunit, ßA subunit, ßB subunit, and follistatin protein in the neonatal ovine ovary.a


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although uterine morphogenesis begins in the fetus, endometrial gland morphogenesis is a uniquely neonatal event [1, 3]. Ovariectomy of the neonatal ewe at birth did not affect the initial genesis and development of endometrial glands on PND 14 [10]. Similarly, ovariectomy of ewes on or before PND 4 had no effect on uterine wet weight at PND 14 [9]. Results of the present study confirm previous reports that the ovary affects uterine growth after PND 14 [6, 11] and demonstrate that ovariectomy of the ewe on PND 7 reduced uterine wet weight by approximately 50% on PND 56. Liefer et al. [11] found a similar reduction in uterine weight on PND 44 in ewes ovariectomized on PND 4. In the present study, ovariectomy reduced growth of the endometrium and myometrium as well as the total number of endometrial glands in the uterus on PND 56. Development of the neonatal uterus involves reciprocal epithelial-mesenchymal interactions [4, 41, 42]. In the developing rodent uterus, the endometrial epithelium affects myometrial organization and growth [42]. In the neonatal ewe, estrogen or progestin treatment of neonatal ewes from birth epigenetically ablates endometrial adenogenesis, reduces uterine growth, and decreases endometrial and myometrial thickness [4, 16]. In contrast, treatment of neonatal ewes with prolactin from birth increases endometrial gland number as well as intercaruncular endometrial and myometrial thickness [37]. These results clearly indicate that effects of ovariectomy on intercaruncular endometrial and myometrial growth may result from decreased development of endometrial glands as well as changes in epithelial-stromal interactions.

In the present study, ovariectomy on PND 7 did not affect the number of superficial ductal invaginations of the GE from the LE or the density of endometrial glands in the stratum compactum area of the stroma on PND 56. Similarly, Bartol et al. [10] found that initial genesis and development of endometrial glands between birth and PND 14 was not dependent on the ovary or an ovarian factor. However, results of the present study clearly demonstrate that the total number of endometrial glands in the uterine wall and the density of the endometrial glands in the stratum spongiosum area of the stroma are reduced in uteri from OVX ewes, indicating that an ovarian-derived factor regulates, in part, the coiling and branching morphogenetic stage of endometrial gland development between PND 14 and PND 56. Postnatal uterine growth and endometrial adenogenesis are ovary-, adrenal-, and steroid-independent in rodents [1214]. In the neonatal gilt, ovariectomy at birth inhibits uterine growth after PND 56 but does not affect genesis of uterine glands or related endometrial morphogenetic events before PND 120 [15]. Collectively, available results indicate that the precise role of ovarian factor(s) in uterine growth and endometrial adenogenesis is species-specific.

The process of uterine morphogenesis is governed by a variety of hormonal, cellular, and molecular mechanisms, many of which remain to be defined (for review, see [4, 43]). Although changes in uterine ER{alpha} gene expression can be correlated with endometrial adenogenesis [3], uterine growth and endometrial gland development is an estrogen-independent process in the ewe between birth and PND 56 [16]. However, endometrial gland coiling and branching morphogenesis between PND 14 and PND 56 is dependent, in part, on uterine ER{alpha} [16]. In the present study, effects of ovariectomy on uterine growth and development observed in the present study were not caused by alterations in circulating E2. Moreover, expression of ER{alpha} and progesterone receptor protein was not different between uteri of CX and OVX ewes (unpublished observations). Therefore, the effects of ovariectomy on uterine growth and endometrial adenogenesis cannot be attributed to alterations in either circulating E2 or the uterine ER{alpha} system.

The ovarian factor that regulates uterine growth and endometrial adenogenesis is not known, but it could be inhibin, follistatin, or activins. In the neonatal ewe, the increase in ovarian weight between PND 14 and PND 56 is caused, in part, by the increase in the number and size of antral follicles and the associated accumulation of follicular fluid [8]. The stimulus for initiation and maintenance of ovarian follicular growth after birth is not known. During this period, low levels of LH can be detected in a pulsatile fashion, whereas FSH secretion is tonic [8, 11, 44]. The unregulated growth of ovarian follicles in the ewe after birth may be caused by endocrine stimuli, such as LH and FSH, as well as by intraovarian mechanisms. In the present study, ewes were born during seasonal anestrus and ovaries collected before puberty, but inhibin {alpha} subunit, ß subunits, and follistatin were expressed in nearly all growing and antral follicles. In the ewe, follistatin levels rise in the fetus during parturition and remain high in the neonate [36]. In contrast, immunoreactive inhibin levels are low at 2 wk and then decline to 15 wk of life in the ewe [35]. In the present study, abundant expression of ß subunits and ActRs as well as of follistatin and inhibin {alpha} subunit was detected in the neonatal ovary. These findings are similar to previously reported results [33, 34]. Undoubtedly, these factors regulate follicular development in the prepubertal ovine ovary through their established roles in GC proliferation and control of pituitary hormones [25, 26].

Recent evidence from studies of the neonatal ovine uterus implicates follistatin, activins, and ActRs as regulators of endometrial gland morphogenesis in the neonatal ovine uterus [17]. Follistatin, activins, and inhibins regulate growth and differentiation of many branched epitheliomesenchymal organs via autocrine, paracrine, and perhaps, endocrine mechanisms [1824]. In general, exogenous activin inhibits gland development, whereas follistatin counteracts these inhibitory effects of activins by binding to the individual ßA and ßB subunits and preventing ActR activation [23, 29]. In a variety of cell types, expression of activin-follistatin system components can be modulated by activins, inhibin, and follistatin in a cell type-specific manner [4549]. Activin can increase follistatin expression and differentially regulate ActR expression in pituitary cells [46]. In testicular tumor cells, activin regulates expression of ActRII and ßA subunit and inhibits cell proliferation [47]. In rat Sertoli cells, activin increases expression of ActR and follistatin and increases cell proliferation [49]. In human GC, activin A increases ßB subunit expression with no effects on ßA mRNA or inhibin {alpha} subunit mRNA [45]. Available results support the working hypothesis that follistatin and activins from the ovary act on the uterus to regulate, in part, coiling and branching morphogenetic development of endometrial glands as well as overall uterine growth. This hypothesis is supported by findings in the present study that the expression of specific components of the activin-follistatin system were affected by ovariectomy and could be correlated with reduced endometrial gland development. Indeed, marked reductions in expression of follistatin, ßA subunit, ActRIA, and ActRII genes and an increase in ßB subunit expression were observed in the uterus of ovariectomized ewes. Furthermore, these changes could be correlated with, but not completely accounted for, by the decreases in uterine size and endometrial gland development in ovariectomized ewes. One or more of the ovarian factors likely is either follistatin, activins, or inhibin.

Collectively, available results support the idea that a factor from the ovary regulates overall development, adenogenesis, and expression of the follistatin-activin system in the neonatal ovine uterus. It is tempting to speculate that the coordinate activities of the activin-inhibin-follistatin system in the ovary and uterus may be important in prolific breeds of ewes that possess an intrinsically high ovulation rate as well as an enhanced uterine capacity to maintain large litters [50]. Future experiments will be directed toward understanding the mechanistic aspects of the novel finding that an ovarian endocrine factor includes a member of the activin-inhibin-follistatin system that may act in concert with autocrine-paracrine effects of the uterine activin-follistatin system to regulate coiling and branching morphogenesis of the endometrial glands during postnatal development of the ovine uterus.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Mr. Kendrick LeBlanc for assistance with animal husbandry and surgeries.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by NIH grants HD38274 and P30ES09106. Back

2 Correspondence: Thomas E. Spencer, Center for Animal Biotechnology and Genomics, 442 Kleberg Center, 2471 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2471. Fax: 979 862 2662; tspencer{at}tamu.edu Back

3 These authors made equal contributions to the manuscript Back

Received: 12 February 2003.

First decision: 21 March 2003.

Accepted: 8 May 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Wiley AA, Bartol FF, Barron DH. Histogenesis of the ovine uterus. J Anim Sci 1987 64:1262-1269
  2. Gray CA, Taylor KM, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Mechanisms regulating norgestomet inhibition of endometrial gland morphogenesis in the neonatal ovine uterus. Mol Reprod Dev 2000 57:67-78[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Taylor KM, Gray CA, Joyce MM, Stewart MD, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Neonatal ovine uterine development involves alterations in expression of receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and prolactin. Biol Reprod 2000 63:1192-1204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gray CA, Johnson GA, Bartol FF, Tarleton BJ, Wiley AA, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Developmental biology of uterine glands. Biol Reprod 2001 65:1311-1323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Taylor KM, Chen C, Gray CA, Joyce MM, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Expression of mRNAs for fibroblast growth factors 7 and 10, hepatocyte growth factor and insulin-like growth factors and their receptors in the neonatal ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 2001 64:1236-1246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kennedy JP, Worthington CA, Cole ER. The post-natal development of the ovary and uterus of the Merino lamb. J Reprod Fertil 1974 36:275-282[Medline]
  7. Jost A. Studies on sex differentiation in mammals. Recent Prog Horm Res 1973 29:1-41
  8. Tassell R, Chamley WA, Kennedy JP. Gonadotrophin levels and ovarian development in the neonatal ewe lamb. Aust J Biol Sci 1978 31:267-273[Medline]
  9. Foster DL, Cook B, Nalbandov AV. Regulation of luteinizing hormone (LH) in the fetal and neonatal lamb: effect of castration during the early postnatal period on levels of LH in sera and pituitaries of neonatal lambs. Biol Reprod 1972 6:253-257[Abstract]
  10. Bartol FF, Wiley AA, Goodlett DR. Ovine uterine morphogenesis: histochemical aspects of endometrial development in the fetus and neonate. J Anim Sci 1988 66:1303-1313
  11. Liefer RW, Foster DL, Dziuk PJ. Levels of LH in the sera and pituitaries of female lambs following ovariectomy and administration of estrogen. Endocrinology 1972 90:981-985[Medline]
  12. Ogasawara Y, Okamoto S, Kitamura Y, Matsumoto K. Proliferative pattern of uterine cells from birth to adulthood in intact, neonatally castrated and/or adrenalectomized mice, assayed by incorporation of [125I]iododeoxyruridine. Endocrinology 1983 113:582-587[Abstract]
  13. Bigsby RM, Cunha GR. Effects of progestins and glucocorticoids on deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in the uterus of the neonatal mouse. Endocrinology 1985 117:2520-2526[Abstract]
  14. Branham WS, Sheehan DM. Ovarian and adrenal contributions to postnatal growth and differentiation of the rat uterus. Biol Reprod 1995 53:863-872[Abstract]
  15. Tarleton BJ, Wiley AA, Spencer TE, Moss AG, Bartol FF. Ovary-independent estrogen receptor expression in neonatal porcine endometrium. Biol Reprod 1998 58:1009-1019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Carpenter KD, Gray CA, Bryan TM, Welsh Jr TH, Spencer TE. Estrogen and anti-estrogen effects on neonatal ovine uterine development. Biol Reprod 2003 69:708-717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hayashi K, Carpenter KD, Gray CA, Spencer TE. The activin-follistatin system in the developing neonatal ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 2003 69:843-850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Tuuri T, Eramaa M, Hilden K, Ritvos O. The tissue distribution of activin ßA- and ßB-subunits and follistatin messenger ribonucleic acids suggests multiple sites of action for the activin-follistatin system during human development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994 78:1521-1524[Abstract]
  19. Ritvos O, Tuuri T, Eramaa M, Sainio K, Hilden K, Saxen L, Gilbert SF. Activin disrupts epithelial branching morphogenesis in developing glandular organs of the mouse. Mech Dev 1995 50:229-245[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Liu QY, Niranjan B, Gomes P, Gomm JJ, Davies D, Coombes RC, Buluwela L. Inhibitory effects of activin on the growth and morphogenesis of primary and transformed mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res 1996 56:1155-1163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Miralles F, Czernichow P, Scharfmann R. Follistatin regulates the relative proportions of endocrine versus exocrine tissue during pancreatic development. Development 1998 125:1017-1024[Abstract]
  22. Maldonado TS, Kadison AS, Crisera CA, Grau JB, Alkasab SL, Longaker MT, Gittes GK. Ontogeny of activin B and follistatin in developing embryonic mouse pancreas: implications for lineage selection. J Gastrointest Surg 2000 4:269-275[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Cancilla B, Jarred RA, Wang H, Mellor SL, Cunha GR, Risbridger GP. Regulation of prostate branching morphogenesis by activin A and follistatin. Dev Biol 2001 237:145-158[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Jones RL, Salamonsen LA, Findlay JK. Potential roles for endometrial inhibins, activins and follistatin during human embryo implantation and early pregnancy. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2002 13:144-150[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Ethier JF, Findlay JK. Roles of activin and its signal transduction mechanisms in reproductive tissues. Reproduction 2001 121:667-675[Abstract]
  26. Welt C, Sidis Y, Keutmann H, Schneyer A. Activins, inhibins, and follistatins: from endocrinology to signaling. A paradigm for the new millennium. Exp Biol Med 2002 227:724-752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Xu J, McKeehan K, Matsuzaki K, Mckeehan WL. Inhibin antagonizes inhibition of liver cell growth by activin by a dominant-negative mechanism. J Biol Chem 1995 270:6308-6313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Iemura S, Yamamoto TS, Takagi C, Uchiyama H, Natsume T, Shimasaki S, Sugino H, Ueno N. Direct binding of follistatin to a complex of bone-morphogenetic protein and its receptor inhibits ventral and epidermal cell fates in early Xenopus embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998 95:9337-9342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ball EM, Risbridger GP. Activins as regulators of branching morphogenesis. Dev Biol 2001 238:1-12[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Nakamura T, Takio K, Eto Y, Shibai H, Titani K, Sugino H. Activin-binding protein from rat ovary is follistatin. Science 1990 247:835-838
  31. De Winter JP, ten Dijke P, de Vries CJ, van Achterberg TA, Sugino H, de Waele P, Huylebroeck D, Verschueren K, van den Eijden-van Raaij AJ. Follistatin neutralize activin bioactivity by inhibition of activin binding to its type II receptors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1996 116:105-114[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Phillips DJ, de Kretser DM. Follistatin: a multifunctional regulatory protein. Front Neuroendocrinol 1998 19:287-322[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Braw-Tal R, Bor A, Gootwine E. Plasma immunoreactive inhibin and FSH in prepubertal Assaf and Booroola-Assaf ewe lambs. Domest Anim Endocrinol 1993 10:87-94[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Braw-Tal R. Expression of mRNA for follistatin and inhibin/activin subunits during follicular growth and atresia. J Mol Endocrinol 1994 13:253-264[Abstract]
  35. Braw-Tal R, Yossefi S, Zenou A, Bor A. Differential expression pattern of inhibin {alpha} and ßA subunits in the ovaries of postnatal and prepubertal lambs. Reprod Fertil Dev 1997 9:825-832[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. McFarlane JR, Xia Y, O'Shea T, Hayward S, O'Connor AE, De Kretser DM. Follistatin concentrations in maternal and fetal fluids during the oestrous cycle, gestation and parturition in Merino sheep. Reproduction 2002 124:259-265[Abstract]
  37. Carpenter KD, Gray CA, Noel S, Gertler A, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Prolactin regulation of neonatal ovine uterine gland morphogenesis. Endocrinology 2003 144:110-120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Gray CA, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Evidence that absence of endometrial gland secretions in uterine gland knockout ewes compromises conceptus survival and elongation. Reproduction 2002 124:289-300[Abstract]
  39. Spencer TE, Gray CA, Joyce MM, Jenster G, Wood CG, Bazer FW, Wiley AA, Bartol FF. Discovery and characterization of genes expressed in the endometrial epithelium using the ovine uterine gland knockout model. Endocrinology 1999 140:4070-4080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, 1990; Version 6. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis System Institute, Inc
  41. Cunha GR, Chung LW, Shannon JM, Taguchi O, Fujii H. Hormone-induced morphogenesis and growth: role of mesenchymal-epithelial interactions. Recent Prog Horm Res 1983 39:559-598
  42. Cunha GR, Young P, Brody JR. Role of uterine epithelium in the development of myometrial smooth muscle cells. Biol Reprod 1989 40:861-871[Abstract]
  43. Bartol FF, Wiley AA, Floyd JG, Ott TL, Bazer FW, Gray CA, Spencer TE. Uterine differentiation as a foundation for subsequent fertility. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1999 54:287-302[Medline]
  44. Foster DL, Lemons JA, Jaffe RB, Niswender GD. Sequential patterns of circulating luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in female sheep from early postnatal life through the first estrous cycles. Endocrinology 1975 97:985-994[Abstract]
  45. Eramaa M, Hilden K, Tuuri T, Ritvos O. Regulation of inhibin/activin subunit messenger ribonucleic acids (mRNAs) by activin A and expression of activin receptor mRNAs in cultured human granulosa-luteal cells. Endocrinology 1995 136:4382-4389[Abstract]
  46. Dalkin AC, Haisenleder DJ, Yasin M, Gilrain JT, Marshall JC. Pituitary activin receptor subtypes and follistatin gene expression in female rats: differential regulation by activin and follistatin. Endocrinology 1996 137:548-554[Abstract]
  47. Di Simone N, Hall HA, Welt C, Schneyer AL. Activin regulates ßA-subunit and activin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid and cellular proliferation in activin-responsive testicular tumor cells. Endocrinology 1998 139:1147-1155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Vanttinen T, Kuulasmaa T, Liu J, Voutilainen R. Expression of activin/inhibin receptor and binding protein genes and regulation of activin/inhibin peptide secretion in human adrenocortical cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002 87:4257-4263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Buzzard JJ, Farnworth PG, De Kretser DM, O'Connor AE, Wreford NG, Morrison JR. Proliferative phase Sertoli cells display a developmentally regulated response to activin in vitro. Endocrinology 2003 144:474-483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Fahmy MH. Prolific sheep. Wallingford, Oxon, U.K.: CAB International; 1996



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K. Hayashi, A. R O'Connell, J. L Juengel, K. P McNatty, G. H Davis, F. W Bazer, and T. E Spencer
Postnatal uterine development in Inverdale ewe lambs
Reproduction, March 1, 2008; 135(3): 357 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S.-Y. Lin, R. G. Craythorn, A. E. O'Connor, M. M. Matzuk, J. E. Girling, J. R. Morrison, and D. M. de Kretser
Female Infertility and Disrupted Angiogenesis Are Actions of Specific Follistatin Isoforms
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 22(2): 415 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Hayashi and T. E. Spencer
Estrogen Disruption of Neonatal Ovine Uterine Development: Effects on Gene Expression Assessed by Suppression Subtraction Hybridization
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 752 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K. Hayashi, K. D Carpenter, T. H Welsh Jr, R. C Burghardt, L. J Spicer, and T. E Spencer
The IGF system in the neonatal ovine uterus
Reproduction, March 1, 2005; 129(3): 337 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. Hayashi, K. D. Carpenter, and T. E. Spencer
Neonatal Estrogen Exposure Disrupts Uterine Development in the Postnatal Sheep
Endocrinology, July 1, 2004; 145(7): 3247 - 3257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. E. Spencer and F. W. Bazer
Uterine and placental factors regulating conceptus growth in domestic animals
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E4 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Hayashi, K. D. Carpenter, C. A. Gray, and T. E. Spencer
The Activin-Follistatin System in the Neonatal Ovine Uterus
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 843 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/3/851    most recent
biolreprod.103.016337v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, T. E.
Agricola