|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Neuroendocrinology |
Animal Reproduction Laboratory,3 Texas A&M University Agricultural Research Station, Beeville, Texas 78102
Department of Animal Science4
Center for Animal Biotechnology and Genomics,5 Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
Department of Pathobiology,6 College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences,7 Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas 78363
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
anterior pituitary, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, hypothalamus, leptin, luteinizing hormone
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Importantly, leptin also stimulates increased LH secretion in animals in which short-term restrictions of nutrient intake do not measurably alter the pattern of LH release. For example, 23 days of fasting reduces expression of the leptin gene and markedly diminishes circulating concentrations of leptin, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 in mature ruminants without reducing mean concentrations of LH or the frequency of LH pulses [11, 1416]. Nonetheless, 23 days of total feed restriction clearly hypersensitizes the mature cow to leptin, resulting in acute increases in the mean baseline and the magnitude of individual pulses of LH [16, 17]. This would suggest that the primary effects of leptin in this animal model are at the AP level. To test this hypothesis further, we examined in vitro the stimulatory effects of leptin on basal and GnRH-mediated secretion of LH from AP explants obtained from fasted and nonfasted cows. To assess coincident hypothalamic responses, the effects of leptin on GnRH secretion from hypothalamic-infundibular (HYP) explants were also examined.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal Model and Procedures
Eleven mature, ovariectomized cows, each bearing an estradiol implant to maintain circulating estradiol at 25 pg/ml, were used. This animal model has been used extensively by our laboratory and others [1619] to study the effects of nutrition on neuroendocrine control of gonadotropin secretion in cattle. With this approach, implants provide a constant level of steroid (estradiol) negative feedback without the complications associated with ovarian cyclicity. Cows used in the current experiments had estradiol concentrations (mean ± SEM) of 4.35 ± 0.45 pg/ml.
Cows in moderately thin body condition (BC) (BC = 4; scale of 19) were fed once daily at 0700 h a diet formulated to provide 100% of the National Research Council (NRC) [20] requirements for maintenance for at least 2 wk before the beginning of the experiment. Each cow was assigned randomly to one of two dietary groups: normal-fed, in which cows were fed 100% of the NRC requirements to maintain body weight (n = 6); and fasted, in which cows were fasted for 72 h with free access to water (n = 5). On the day before the start of dietary treatments (Day -1), cows were fitted with jugular catheters (polyethylene tubing; inside diameter, 1.4 mm; outside diameter, 1.9 mm; Becton Dickinson, Parsippany, NJ) for intensive blood sampling. Cows were placed in stanchions, and blood was collected at 10-min intervals for 6 h on Days 0 and 3 of the experiment via an extension connected to the jugular catheter. Blood samples were dispensed into tubes containing 150 µl of a solution containing heparin (1000 IU/ml) and 5% EDTA and placed immediately on ice. Plasma was harvested by centrifugation and stored at -20°C until hormone analysis. At the end of the intensive blood sampling on Day 3, cows were killed by exsanguination following captive bolt stunning. Diencephalons were removed after disconnection of infundibuli from adenohypophyses. Adenohypophyses were removed from the sella turcica and kept on ice until tissue processing.
Effects of Leptin on Basal and GnRH-Mediated Release of LH from AP Explants
Adenohypophyses collected from each cow were dissected and sliced sagittally into approximately 0.5- x 2-mm strips. Four AP strips from each adenohypophysis were selected randomly, placed into each of five perifusion chambers, and perifused with Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (KRB) for 6.5 h using a multiple microchamber perifusion system (Endotronics, Inc., Coon Rapids, MN). Thus, AP explants from each cow were perifused with each dose of leptin tested or control media. In preliminary studies, it was determined that basal release of LH by AP explants was attained within the first 2.5 h of perifusion. At 2.5 h, AP explants were perifused for 2 h with KRB containing 0 (control), 5, 10, 50, or 100 ng/ml of recombinant ovine leptin (Dr. Arieh Gartler, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel). After 4.5 h of perifusion, AP explants were challenged with 50 ng of GnRH (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) via an injection port in the chamber (Fig. 1A). In addition to investigating the effects of leptin on GnRH-mediated release of LH, the stimulation of AP explants by GnRH also made it possible to verify the viability of tissues based on specific stimulation of gonadotropin release.
|
Approximately 1-ml fractions of perifused media were collected at 10-min intervals and stored at -20°C until analysis for LH. In a separate study, we have reported simultaneous effects of leptin on basal and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-mediated GH release from these same explants [21].
Effects of Leptin on GnRH Secretion from the Isolated Medial Basal Hypothalamus-Infundibular Complex
To isolate the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH), the entire HYP complex was transected sagittally into equal halves. A cut was made 2 mm lateral to the median sagittal cut for each half, followed by an anterior coronal cut extending from the optic chiasm to the anterior commissure. A posterior coronal cut was also made, resulting in a section containing approximately half the mammillary body. A final transverse cut containing two-thirds of the mammillary body was performed. Each half of the MBH connected to its infundibular half was incubated in 0.7 ml of KRB for 5 h. Medium was collected and replaced every 30 min. After a 2.5-h period of equilibration, HYP explants from each cow were incubated with KRB containing either 0 or 1000 ng of ovine leptin (oleptin) for 1 h, so that one half served as a control for the corresponding half (Fig. 1B). At 4 h of incubation, all explants were incubated with KRB containing 60 mM K+ to test tissue viability, based on nonspecific stimulation of GnRH release [22].
Doses of recombinant oleptin used to treat HYP explants were chosen empirically based on quantities shown to have positive effects in comparable tissue collected from rodents [9] and on preliminary experiments using tissues collected from bulls and steers at slaughter. In these preliminary experiments, GnRH released from HYP explants collected from full-fed cattle was not affected by leptin (11000 ng of recombinant oleptin for 3060 min). This observation was not totally surprising, because the stimulatory effects of leptin on LH release observed in vivo [11] were limited to fasted cows. Thus, we chose to use 1000 ng of oleptin in the current experiment.
Radioimmunoassays
Concentrations of GnRH in HYP culture media were determined by a validated assay as described previously [22]. Plasma concentrations of LH and concentrations of LH in AP perifused media were determined as reported previously [23]. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation for these assays averaged 6.2% and 10.7%, respectively. Serum estradiol was assayed in extracted samples in a single assay as reported previously [24].
Statistical Analysis
Circulating concentrations of LH were analyzed by general linear mixed models for repeated measures using the mixed procedure (PROC MIXED) of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS 8.1; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). The frequency and amplitude of LH pulses were determined using both visual inspection and a pulse-detection algorithm, Pulsefit 1.2 [25]. Sources of variation were diet, day, and diet x day. Day was used as the repeated variable, and cow(diet) was used as the subject.
To test the effects of diet, leptin, and GnRH treatments on the release of LH from AP explants in vitro, the 6.5-h period of perifusion was subdivided in three periods (IIII) corresponding to equilibration (02.5 h), basal release (2.54.5 h), and GnRH stimulation (4.56.5 h), respectively. Hormone data obtained from perifused media were analyzed by the general linear mixed model (PROC MIXED) procedure of SAS. Sources of variation were diet, leptin treatment, period, and all interactions. Period was used as the repeated variable, and cow(diet) was used as the subject. The least squares means procedure was used to compare means when a significant F value was obtained. Because of differences in the release of LH by AP explants among perifusion chambers at the end of the equilibration period, covariate analyses were performed to test main effects during period II (basal release). Mean concentrations of LH in the last three samples collected during equilibration were used as the covariate (covariate 1). To test main effects during period III (GnRH stimulation), another covariate analysis was performed, using the mean of the last three samples of period II (basal) as covariate (covariate 2). To test cumulative (basal + GnRH) effects of leptin and GnRH stimulation on the amount of LH released by AP explants, an analysis was performed using covariate 1 to test main effects during period III.
To test the effects of leptin on GnRH release from HYP explants, data were analyzed by the general linear mixed model procedure of SAS (PROC MIXED). Sources of variation were diet, leptin treatment, period, and all possible interactions. Period was used as the repeated variable, and cow(diet) was used as the subject.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As expected, mean plasma concentrations and mean frequency and amplitude of LH pulses did not differ (P > 0.1) between fasted and normal-fed groups before the cows were killed (Table 1). Using covariate analysis to adjust for differences in basal release of LH among perifusion chambers, it was observed that dietary treatment interacted with in vitro leptin treatments to influence the release of LH from AP explants. Leptin-treated AP explants from fasted cows had a higher (P < 0.02) basal release of LH than control-treated explants. Because effects of individual doses of leptin on the basal release of LH from AP explants of fasted cows did not differ, all doses of leptin were combined for presentation (Fig. 2). In explants of normal-fed cows, leptin did not affect (P > 0.1) basal release of LH (Fig. 2).
|
|
In contrast to observations made for basal release, all doses of leptin increased (P < 0.001) GnRH-mediated release of LH from AP explants of normal-fed, but not of fasted, cows (Fig. 3). In fact, in the fasted group, AP explants treated with 5 ng/ml of oleptin released less (P < 0.001) LH (1059 ± 55.4 ng/ml, ± SEM) in response to GnRH than control-treated explants (1133 ± 62.6 ng/ml, ± SEM), and all other doses had no effect on this variable. Because leptin increased basal release of LH from AP explants obtained from fasted cows before GnRH treatment, followed by nonsignificant numerical increases after GnRH, we examined the combined effects of leptin on basal and GnRH-stimulated release of LH. Leptin at doses of 50 (1416 ± 87.6 ng/ml, ± SEM) and 100 ng/ml (1455 ± 89.1 ng/ml, ± SEM) increased (P < 0.001) the overall (basal plus GnRH-stimulated) mean concentration of LH compared to control-treated explants.
|
Effects of Leptin on the Secretion of GnRH from the MBH-Infundibular Complex
Data from one normal-fed cow were not included in the analysis because of a lack of response to 60 mM K+, suggesting a loss of tissue viability. Neither fasting nor leptin affected (P > 0.1) basal or potassium-stimulated release of GnRH from HYP explants (Fig. 4).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As noted previously, 23 days of restricted feed intake does not affect mean concentrations of LH or its secretory patterns in mature ewes or cows [11, 1416], although signs of metabolic stress, including decreased circulating insulin, IGF-I, and leptin, are clearly present. Similar metabolic constraints are observed in fasted heifers [12, 13] and estradiol-implanted wethers [11], but in these ruminant animal models, short-term fasting is able to reduce the frequency of LH pulses similar to that observed for monogastric species [2628]. Nonetheless, feed-restricted, mature cows are responsive to leptin treatment, and mean concentrations, mean baseline, and magnitude of LH pulses are increased [16].
Questions then arise as to whether stimulation of LH release by leptin is accounted for by effects at hypothalamic and/or AP levels. Most studies have proposed that leptin stimulates secretion of LH via interaction with neuronal systems and, ultimately, stimulation of GnRH secretory neurons. In models in which the frequency of LH pulses is diminished by feed restriction [11, 13], leptin likely stimulates GnRH release to prevent the effects of fasting. Alternatively, diminished release of LH during fasting could be explained by changes in the amplitude of GnRH pulses and GnRH's ability to trigger LH release, as observed previously in this laboratory [18] and in others [29] for other physiological contexts. However, under feed-restricted conditions, in which frequency of LH pulses is not affected, as observed in mature female ruminants [16], the stimulatory effects of leptin on LH secretion are more plausibly explained by a direct action at the adenohypophysis. In addition to the current results, evidence supporting a direct action of leptin at the level of the adenohypophysis includes the localization of leptin receptors on gonadotropes of ewes [8] and leptin stimulation of LH release from rat anterior pituitaries in vitro [9]. However, in contrast to the study performed using rat tissue [9], we observed no effect of leptin on basal release of LH from AP explants from normal-fed cows, suggesting important species differences in the acute interaction of nutritional status and leptin with gonadotropes in cattle. This view is supported further by our observation that LH release from primary cultures of bovine AP cells, maintained under optimal nutrient conditions, was not affected by leptin at doses of 11000 ng/ml (unpublished observations).
Increases in basal release of LH from AP explants from fasted cows treated with leptin appear to be different than what would be expected from a classical secretagogue. In fact, after the period of equilibration (initial 2.5 h of perifusion) and before GnRH stimulation (last 2 h of perifusion), basal release of LH tended to continue to decrease in all treatments, independent of dietary group. This steady decline in the release of LH during the basal-release period may reflect the absence of stimulation by endogenous GnRH. However, the decrease in LH release by AP explants from fasted cows treated with leptin was significantly smaller than control-treated explants. This effect was not observed in explants from normal-fed cows. It is possible that leptin may have stimulated an increase in basal metabolism of gonadotropes from fasted cows, resulting in an elevated release of LH compared to gonadotropes of control-treated explants. In support of this concept, increased glucose uptake has been observed in muscle and adipose tissue treated with leptin [30].
Mechanisms involved in the leptin-mediated increase in responsiveness to GnRH of AP explants from normal-fed cows are unknown. However, these effects could occur through several potential pathways, including effects on Ca2+ ion channels, an increase in the releasable pool of LH, and/or GnRH-receptor desensitization. All of these are important for cellular exocytosis of gonadotropins [31]. Leptin-receptor signaling involves activation of Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) pathways [32]. In addition, mitogen-activated protein kinase [32] and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase [33] have also been involved in leptin-receptor signaling. In porcine chromaffin cells, leptin caused a sustained increase of intracellular Ca2+ and activated inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate production [34], which are intracellular factors known to be associated with GnRH-receptor signaling and release of LH [35].
The lack of increased responsiveness to GnRH in AP explants from fasted cows treated with leptin is unclear. However, it is well established that GnRH stimulation of gonadotropes is necessary for synthesis of gonadotropins [36]. Thus, it is possible that the increased basal release of LH observed in leptin-treated explants of fasted cows and lack of any GnRH stimulation during this period caused a diminution of readily releasable pools of LH that were not replenished.
Experimental models describing the temporal secretion pattern of GnRH by the hypothalamus have been developed in several large species. In sheep, this has been accomplished through collection of hypophyseal-portal blood [37]. In the mature cow, the anatomy of the cranium impairs practical application of this technique. However, collection of cerebrospinal fluid from the third ventricle has been shown by our laboratory and others to be a useful approach for determining patterns of GnRH secretion in cattle and sheep [18, 37], and studies are currently underway to investigate the effects of leptin using this approach. Incubation of HYP explants has also been used extensively to study the neuroendocrine regulation of GnRH release [3840] in several species. In vitro incubations of isolated HYP tissue allows the investigation of factors acting directly at the hypothalamus. Hypothalamic explants used in the present experiment included the MBH connected to the infundibulum. The arcuate nucleus, which rests within the MBH, contains leptin receptors [7] as well as neuronal cell bodies that express mediators of the effects of leptin within the central nervous system, such as neuropeptide Y, agouti-related peptide, and POMC (precursor of
-melanocyte-stimulating hormone) [1]. Thus, explants used in the present experiment contain at least part of the neuronal systems that potentially mediate the effects of leptin on GnRH neurons. Using this approach, we were unable to detect effects of leptin on GnRH secretion from hypothalamus harvested from either normal-fed or fasted cows. In contrast, Yu et al. [9] have reported that leptin stimulates GnRH release from rat hypothalamic explants. Whether these discordant results are caused by species differences or the experimental methodology used to detect the effects of leptin is not clear.
Mechanisms that explain the inability of leptin to independently stimulate an increase in circulating concentrations of LH in cattle and sheep that are fed either maintenance [11, 41, 42] or growing diets [43] are not understood. However, the inability of leptin to stimulate directly basal secretion of LH in AP explants of normal-fed cows in the present study supports those findings. Syndromes involving the development of resistance to leptin have been observed in obese humans [44, 45] and rodents [46, 47], and evidence suggests that excessive activity of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)-3 activity is involved in leptin resistance [48, 49]. Inhibition of leptin signaling by SOCS-3 seems to involve suppression of JAK2 activation [48]. Whether a leptin-resistant condition occurs in ruminants that are under neutral or positive energy balance has not been determined; however, leptin is able to decrease feed intake in sheep [41, 42]. Moreover, the mass of ligand reaching target tissues must also be considered. We have reported recently that intravenously injected recombinant oleptin causes an inverse, dose-related increase in basal plasma concentrations of LH in ovariectomized, estradiol-implanted cows fasted for 60 h [17]. A dose of 0.2 µg/kg maximized the increase in LH, whereas doses of 2 and 20 µg/kg caused a lower response and no response, respectively. Reports in rodents [9] confirm that AP explants treated with high concentrations of leptin (10-5 M) lose their ability to respond with an increase in LH release. Therefore, the duration and/or amount of exposure to the hormone likely determines the development of resistance.
In conclusion, results from the current experiment support the hypothesis that leptin affects the secretion of LH in the mature cow, in part, by its direct action at the adenohypophysis. Leptin maintained higher basal AP release of LH in tissues obtained only from fasted cows, whereas increased responsiveness to GnRH was evident in AP explants obtained from normal-fed cows. This indicates that whereas leptin acts on gonadotroph function under both normal and fasting conditions, the manifestations of these effects are expressed differentially and will require further study at the cellular level to characterize in detail.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Correspondence: G.L. Williams, Animal Reproduction Laboratory, Texas A&M University Agricultural Research Station, 3507 Hwy 59 E, Beeville, TX 78102-9410. FAX: 361 358 4930; glw{at}fnbnet.net ![]()
Received: 11 April 2003.
First decision: 1 May 2003.
Accepted: 10 June 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Martin, R. J. Rasby, D. R. Brink, R. U. Lindquist, D. H. Keisler, and S. D. Kachman Effects of supplementation of whole corn germ on reproductive performance, calf performance, and leptin concentration in primiparous and mature beef cows J Anim Sci, November 1, 2005; 83(11): 2663 - 2670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Maciel, D. A. Zieba, M. Amstalden, D. H. Keisler, J. P. Neves, and G. L. Williams Chronic administration of recombinant ovine leptin in growing beef heifers: Effects on secretion of LH, metabolic hormones, and timing of puberty J Anim Sci, October 1, 2004; 82(10): 2930 - 2936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.A. Zieba, M. Amstalden, S. Morton, M.N. Maciel, D.H. Keisler, and G.L. Williams Regulatory Roles of Leptin at the Hypothalamic-Hypophyseal Axis Before and after Sexual Maturation in Cattle Biol Reprod, September 1, 2004; 71(3): 804 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |