Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 29, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.021550
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/3/600    most recent
biolreprod.103.021550v2
biolreprod.103.021550v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salva, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salva, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Salva, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. M.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 70, 600–607 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.021550
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Testis

Müllerian-Inhibiting Substance Inhibits Rat Leydig Cell Regeneration after Ethylene Dimethanesulphonate Ablation1

Antonio Salva3, Matthew P. Hardy3, Xiu-feng Wu5, Chantal M. Sottas3, David T. MacLaughlin4, Patricia K. Donahoe4, and Mary M. Lee2,5

Population Council and The Rockefeller University,3 New York, New York 10021 Pediatric Surgical Research Laboratories,4 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 Pediatric Endocrine Division,5 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The postnatal development of Leydig cell precursors is postulated to be controlled by Sertoli cell secreted factors, which may have a determinative influence on Leydig cell number and function in sexually mature animals. One such hormone, Mullerian inhibiting substance (MIS), has been shown to inhibit DNA synthesis and steroidogenesis in primary Leydig cells and Leydig cell tumor lines. To further delineate the effects of MIS on Leydig cell proliferation and steroidogenesis, we employed the established ethylene dimethanesulphonate (EDS) model of Leydig cell regeneration. Following EDS ablation of differentiated Leydig cells in young adult rats, recombinant MIS or vehicle was delivered by intratesticular injection for 4 days (Days 11–14 after EDS). On Days 15 and 35 after EDS (1 and 21 days post-MIS injections), endocrine function was assessed and testes were collected for stereology, immunohistochemistry, and assessment of proliferation and steroidogenesis. Although serum testosterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) were no different, intratesticular testosterone was higher on Day 35 in MIS-treated animals. At both time points, intratesticular 5{alpha}-androstan-3{alpha},17ß-diol concentrations were much higher than that of testosterone. MIS-treated animals had fewer mesenchymal precursors on Day 15 and fewer differentiated Leydig cells on Day 35 with decreased numbers of BrdU+ nuclei. Apoptotic interstitial cells were observed only in the MIS-treated testes, not in the vehicle-treated group on Day 15. These data suggest that MIS inhibits regeneration of Leydig cells in EDS-treated rats by enhancing apoptotic cell death as well as by decreasing proliferative capacity.

Leydig cells, male reproductive tract, mechanisms of hormone action, testis, testosterone


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Testosterone, the sex steroid hormone essential for male sex differentiation, secondary sexual maturation, and spermatogenesis is produced primarily by testicular Leydig cells. Two successive populations of Leydig cells populate the testis: fetal Leydig cells and postnatal adult Leydig cells. The postnatal population of Leydig cells derives from undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells in the testicular interstitial space. During pubertal maturation, the immature Leydig cells proliferate and differentiate to generate the mature population of Leydig cells [13]. As these Leydig cells differentiate, they become less mitotically active such that fully differentiated adult Leydig cells no longer divide. In rats and several other species, the process of Leydig cell development can be reproduced during adult life by treatment with ethylene dimethanesulfonate (EDS), an alkylating toxicant that is selectively cytotoxic for differentiated Leydig cells [46]. A single intraperitoneal injection of EDS ablates the differentiated Leydig cells within 3–5 days, with regeneration of new Leydig cells from undifferentiated interstitial mesenchymal precursors starting 14 days after EDS administration [7, 8].

The process of Leydig cell regeneration after EDS ablation is controlled by both extratesticular hormones, such as luteinizing hormone (LH) [7, 9] and thyroid hormone [10], as well as local testicular factors, such as Kit ligand [11]. Other factors are also postulated to have a role in this process. One candidate is Müllerian inhibiting substance (MIS) or anti-Müllerian hormone, a homodimeric glycoprotein member of the transforming growth factor-ß superfamily [12]. MIS is a Sertoli cell product that is best known for its role in inducing regression of the Müllerian ducts in the male embryo. Recent studies suggest that MIS also acts as a paracrine hormone to inhibit Leydig cell proliferation and differentiation after birth [1315]. Mice null for Mis [14, 16] or the receptor gene [17] develop Leydig cell hyperplasia and foci of Leydig cell tumors. In contrast, mice that overexpress human MIS have reduced Leydig cell numbers and serum testosterone concentrations [14, 18, 19]. Treatment of adult mice and rats with MIS induces transitory decreases in testosterone production [20, 21]. In addition, in vitro studies have shown that the MIS type II receptor is expressed in primary Leydig cells and that MIS can downregulate DNA synthesis and steroidogenesis in primary Leydig cell cultures [13, 15].

Although MIS inhibits DNA synthesis in proliferating Leydig cells from peripubertal rats [13, 15], their long doubling time in culture has hindered efforts to confirm a direct antiproliferative action of MIS. To investigate further the actions of MIS on Leydig cell proliferation and steroidogenesis, we employed the EDS model of Leydig cell regeneration. This study was designed to test whether MIS inhibits the proliferation and/or differentiation of regenerating Leydig cells after EDS ablation of mature Leydig cells. We asked whether MIS suppresses the recovery of Leydig cell numbers and alters steroidogenesis and whether these effects, if present, were transitory (present only immediately after MIS exposure) or sustained (still present 20 days beyond the period of exposure to MIS).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Sixty-day-old adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and housed in standard rat cages in a controlled light (14L:10D) and temperature (23°C) environment with ad libitum access to food and water. All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of both Rockefeller University (Protocol 91200-R2) and Duke University Medical Center (A433-00-09).

MIS and EDS

Recombinant human MIS was produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the human MIS gene and purified by immunoaffinity chromatography in the Pediatric Surgical Research Laboratories at Massachusetts General Hospital [22]. The highly purified MIS was quantified by ELISA and its bioactivity verified in a urogenital ridge bioassay [23, 24]. Recombinant human MIS is bioactive across species, as demonstrated in the rat urogenital ridge assay [22], the mouse fetal ovary assay [25], and other in vitro systems [13, 14].

The EDS was a gift from Dr. L. Earl Gray, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC (purchased from Radion Co.).

Experimental Protocol

Intraperitoneal injections were administered after sedation with isofluorane anesthesia. Twenty rats received 75 mg/kg body weight (BW) EDS by i.p. injection on Day 1. On Days 11, 12, 13, and 14, 10 rats received daily intratesticular injections of 75 µg human recombinant MIS in 80 µl and 10 rats received vehicle (0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4,) in a volume of 80 µl. The pharmacologic dose of MIS was chosen based on a prior study that demonstrated the efficacy of this dose to modulate Leydig cell steroidogenesis [20]. In that study, intratesticular injection of 75 µg MIS caused a transient elevation of serum and intratesticular fluid MIS concentrations for 48 h. Five rats in each group were killed 1 day after completing the daily MIS injections (Day 15) and the remaining five were killed 20 days later (Day 35). One hour before being killed, the rats were weighed and given 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 100 mg/kg BW by i.p. injection. The rats were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg BW of pentobarbital i.p., then one testis was removed, weighed, flash-frozen, and stored at -80°C. Blood was collected by cardiac puncture, then separated and the serum stored at -20°C until assay. The rats were then perfused via the left ventricle with Bouin solution for 30–45 min [26]. The perfused testes were removed, weighed, postfixed in Bouin solution overnight at 4°C, and stored in 70% ethanol at 4°C until further processing for stereology and immunohistochemistry.

Stereology

The numbers of Leydig cells and their mesenchymal-like precursors were measured by stereology using the fractionator method [2731]. Fixed testes were sequentially fractionated into small blocks representing a known fraction of the whole testis. Selected blocks were embedded in paraffin and exhaustively sectioned at 4 µm. Contiguous pairs of sections were mounted onto glass slides, which were stored at room temperature. Each slide represented a known fraction of the original paraffin block, which could be extrapolated to a known fraction of the whole testis. In every fractionation step, the selection of a set of blocks or of 4-µm-thick sections was performed with systematic random sampling.

Leydig cells were cytologically identified by positive staining for cytochrome P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc) while mesenchymal-like precursor cells were defined as spindle-shaped interstitial cells with minimal cytoplasm and an elongated nucleus. The mesenchymal cells did not express P450scc by immunohistochemistry and were located within the interstitial spaces but not in direct contact with the seminiferous tubules (as were peritubular myoid cells) or blood vessels (as were pericytes). Leydig cells and mesenchymal-like cells were counted in randomly selected areas using a planapochromatic 60x objective. Following the physical dissector method, nuclei in the test area of a section were not counted if they were also observed in the corresponding reference area in the contiguous serial section. The counting rule stipulated that nuclei visualized partially at the lower or right edge of the test area were included, whereas those located at the upper or left edges were excluded. At least 100 cells were scored for each sample.

The estimated total numbers of Leydig cells and mesenchymal cells per testis were calculated by multiplying the number of cells scored by the product of the reciprocals of each of the sampling fractions. The total number of BrdU-positive cells per testis was determined based on the percentage of proliferative cells and the total number of cells per testis calculated by stereology.

Hormonal Assays

To determine the effect of MIS treatment on Leydig cell steroidogenic function, the concentrations of serum testosterone and LH and intratesticular testosterone and 5{alpha}-androstan-3{alpha},17ß-diol (3{alpha}-diol) were assessed by RIA using 3H-testosterone, 125I-LH or 3H-3{alpha}-diol, respectively, as the tracers [32]. The frozen testicular fragments were homogenized in 70% methanol and ether-extracted before the intratesticular steroid assays were performed [33]. A known amount of tritiated testosterone was added to the homogenate during the extraction procedure to calculate the percentage recovery. Results were corrected accordingly.

TdT-Mediated dUTP-Biotin Nick End Labeling (TUNEL)

To determine whether MIS induces cell death during the early stages of Leydig cell regeneration (Day 15), in situ end labeling was performed on samples from rats treated with MIS or vehicle and killed 24 h after the last injection. Labeling was performed following a previously described procedure [34]. Briefly, sections were dewaxed and rehydrated, incubated with proteinase K, washed in 100 mM PBS, then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 0.1% H2O2 in PBS. Sections were then washed and incubated in TdT buffer (0.03 M Tris, pH 7.2, 0.014 M sodium cacodylate, 0.001 M cobalt chloride) for 20 min, followed by incubation in TdT buffer containing TdT and biotin-dUTP for 1 h at 37°C. After stopping the reaction with two washes in saline sodium citrate and a 2% BSA PBS blocking incubation, the colored reaction product was visualized using the Vectastain Elite ABC Kit (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). Sections were counterstained with Mayer hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted.

Immunohistochemistry

Testis blocks were fixed in Bouin, then embedded in paraffin for sectioning at a thickness of 5 µm. Leydig cells were identified on the basis of positive immunohistochemical staining for P450scc using a rabbit anti-P450scc antibody (Cat #RDI-P450SCCabr; Research Diagnostics, Inc., Flanders, NJ). Spindle-shaped interstitial cells lacking P450scc staining were classified as mesenchymal-like precursors. Proliferative activity was assessed in the same sections using an anti-BrdU antibody (Cat #RPN 202; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ).

The sections were first dewaxed, then microwaved at maximum power (1380 W) for 13 min in 100 mM citrate, pH 6.0, for antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by incubation in 0.3% H2O2 in methanol for 18 min. The slides were washed with 0.1% Tween 20 in 10 mM PBS, incubated for 20 min in blocking serum (10% normal goat serum PBS), then exposed to the monoclonal anti-BrdU antibody at room temperature for 1 h in a humidified chamber. After washing, the slides were incubated with a biotin-goat anti-mouse antibody (Zymed Labs, San Francisco, CA) diluted 1:200 in 5% normal goat serum (NGS) for 20 min at room temperature. Immunoreactive cells were visualized using the Vectastain Elite ABC Kit (Vector Labs) with 3'3 diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (Boehringer Mannheim, Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) as the chromogen. To identify Leydig cells, the same sections were subsequently washed well, blocked with 10% normal goat serum, and incubated with an antibody to P450scc for 1 h. The sections were then incubated with a biotin-goat anti-rabbit antibody 1:200 in 5% NGS in PBS for 30 min. After a wash step, immunoreactive cells were visualized using alkaline phosphatase (Vectastain ABC-AP) and Vector Red AP Substrate (Vector Labs). Sections processed with PBS instead of the primary antibody were used as negative immunohistochemistry controls.

Immunohistochemistry was performed on alternate sections using a rabbit polyclonal antibody to 5{alpha}-reductase, type 1, at 1:100 (gift of Dr. Bernard Robaire, McGill University, Montreal, PQ, Canada) [35], a commercial rabbit anti-P450scc antibody at 1:3000 (Cat #RDI-P450SCCabr, Research Diagnostics, Inc.), and a rabbit anti-porcine P450c17 antibody at 1:6000 (gift of Dr. Dale Buchanan Hales, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL) with the Vectastain Elite ABC Kit (Vector Labs) as described above. All sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.

Data Analysis

All data were evaluated at two time points, on Day 15 post-EDS, 24 h after the last bilateral injection of MIS or vehicle, and on Day 35 post-EDS, 21 days after the last injection of MIS or vehicle. The results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Differences between paired means were assessed using the Student t-test analysis or the Mann-Whitney U-test. Differences were regarded as significant when P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Body and Testis Weight

Body and testis weights were equivalent in MIS- and vehicle-treated rats at both time points (Days 15 and 35 after EDS) (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Body and testis weights in MIS versus vehicle-treated rats after EDS injection.a

Cell Numbers

To evaluate the effect of MIS on Leydig cell regeneration after EDS-induced depletion, the total number of mesenchymal-like precursor cells and Leydig cells per testis and their proliferative indexes were determined at both time points. On Day 15, fewer mesenchymal cells were observed in the MIS-treated group than in the vehicle-treated group, 4.8 ± 0.7 (x106 cells per testis, mean ± SEM) versus 9.0 ± 1.3 (x 106, mean ± SEM), P < 0.05 (Fig. 1). By Day 35, the number of mesenchymal cells was no different between the MIS- and vehicle-treated groups (Fig. 1).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. The effect of intratesticular injections of MIS or vehicle (V) on the numbers of mesenchymal-like cells per testis in EDS-treated rats. Mesenchymal cell numbers on Days 15 and 35 were determined by stereology and expressed as the mean ± SEM in millions of cells per testis. * P < 0.05

During the early phase of Leydig cell regeneration at Day 15, the number of Leydig cells was similar between MIS- and vehicle-treated animals (Fig. 2). By the later time point, Day 35 after EDS (21 days after completing the MIS treatment), the MIS-treated testes had fewer Leydig cells than the vehicle-treated testes, 14.0 ± 1.7 versus 21.2 ± 2.3 (x106) cells per testis, P < 0.05 (Fig. 2). Thus, compared with vehicle treatment, MIS-treated animals had 47% fewer mesenchymal cells at the early time point and 34% fewer Leydig cells at the later time point. These results demonstrate that MIS inhibited the recruitment and/or proliferation of Leydig cell progenitors and limited the recovery in numbers of mature differentiated Leydig cells after EDS-induced depletion.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. The effect of intratesticular injections of MIS or vehicle (V) on the numbers of Leydig cells per testis in EDS-treated rats. Leydig cell numbers on Days 15 and 35 were determined by stereology and expressed as the mean ± SEM in millions of cells per testis. * P < 0.05

Proliferative Index

To determine whether the observed differences in cell number with MIS administration were due to effects of MIS on cellular proliferation, the percentage of BrdU-labeled mesenchymal-like precursor cells was determined in the same testis samples that had been used for stereology. The results, expressed as the total number of BrdU+ nuclei per testis, provide an index of active proliferation (Fig. 3). On Day 15, the MIS-treated group had twice as many BrdU+ cells on testicular sections than the control group (P < 0.05). In contrast, on Day 35, the testicular sections from MIS-treated animals revealed 4.5-fold fewer BrdU+ cells than those from the vehicle-treated group (P < 0.05).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. BrdU+ labeling of mesenchymal-like cells in EDS-treated rats after intratesticular injections of MIS or vehicle (V). BrdU+ nuclei were counted on Days 15 and 35. Values are calculated based on the percentage of BrdU+ cells and the stereological counts of mesenchymal-like cells per testis, and expressed as mean ± SEM in millions of cells per testis. * P < 0.05

TUNEL Labeling

To determine if the reduction in the number of mesenchymal cells on Day 15 is due to a proapoptotic effect of MIS on regenerating Leydig cell precursors, TUNEL was performed to identify cells undergoing apoptotic cell death. No TUNEL-labeled nuclei were observed in the interstitial cells of any sections from vehicle-treated testes while scattered positive nuclei were observed in the MIS-treated group. The TUNEL-positive nuclei displayed the characteristic DNA fragmentation observed in cells undergoing apoptosis (Fig. 4). This suggested that the reduction in the number of mesenchymal cell precursors in the MIS-treated animals on Day 15 was due, at least in part, to a proapoptotic effect of MIS on these cells during the regeneration process after EDS ablation.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. TUNEL staining of representative light micrographs of 4-µm-thick testicular sections from MIS- and control-treated rats on Day 15 after EDS treatment. A) Control rat. B and C) MIS-treated rats. Most of the TUNEL-positive nuclei are located within the seminiferous tubules and correspond to germ cells. Arrow: interstitial cell with TUNEL-positive nucleus. Scale bar = (A and B) 100 µm and (C) 25 µm

Hormonal Measurements

Serum concentrations of testosterone and LH were not statistically different in MIS-treated and vehicle-treated animals at either time point. In both groups, the serum testosterone concentrations were low but detectable on Day 15 and within the range of normal adult values by Day 35 (Fig. 5). LH concentrations followed an inverse pattern, being higher on Day 15 and normal on Day 35. Similarly, the intratesticular concentrations of testosterone and 3{alpha}-diol were low on Day 15 and higher on Day 35. In addition, on Day 35, the concentration of intratesticular testosterone was significantly elevated in the MIS-treated group compared with the control group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6). When calculated as the testosterone production rate, the MIS-treated animals produced 15.9 ng testosterone/106 Leydig cells versus 2.8 ng/106 Leydig cells in vehicle-treated controls (P < 0.05). At both time points, the intratesticular concentrations of 3{alpha}-diol exceeded that of testosterone by 3- to 6-fold (P < 0.01). These data showed that, although the steroidogenic capacity of the regenerating Leydig cells was increased by MIS treatment (higher testosterone production rate and intratesticular androgen concentrations), serum androgen concentrations were not statistically different. This may reflect the small number of animals studied and the inherent wide fluctuations of serum androgen concentrations or the markedly reduced numbers of Leydig cells.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Effect of MIS or vehicle (V) injections on serum testosterone and LH concentrations in EDS-treated rats, expressed as the mean ± SEM. Blood samples were obtained on Days 15 and 35 after EDS treatment. Serum hormone concentrations were not significantly different with MIS versus vehicle injections. A) Testosterone. B) LH



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. The effect of MIS or vehicle (V) on intratesticular concentrations of testosterone (T) and 3{alpha}-diol in EDS-treated rats at 15 and 35 days. Mean intratesticular androgen concentrations are expressed as total ng per testis (mean ± SEM). * P < 0.05 intratesticular T concentration compared with the vehicle-treated group at the same time point

Expression of Steroidogenic Enzymes

Immunohistochemistry was performed on testes collected on Days 15 and 35 to examine the effect of MIS on P450scc, P450c17, and 5{alpha}-reductase protein expression in regenerating Leydig cells. Fifteen days after EDS ablation, the expression of all three enzymes was low and similar between MIS- and vehicle-treated testes (not shown). At 35 days, immunoreactivity of each of the three enzymes was more intense per cell in MIS-treated than vehicle-treated animals (Fig. 7), but there appeared to be fewer Leydig cells per microscopic field of MIS-treated testes, consistent with the stereology and hormone data. The reduced numbers of Leydig cells and higher concentration of intratesticular testosterone in the MIS-treated animals compared with control suggest that androgen secretory capacity and steroidogenic enzyme expression per cell is higher after MIS administration.



View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Immunohistochemistry of testicular sections from MIS- and vehicle-treated rats on Day 35 after EDS ablation, counterstained with hematoxylin. A) 5{alpha}-reductase. B) P450c17. C) P450scc. Original magnification x400


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
MIS is believed to have a regulatory role in the development of the adult population of Leydig cells. Our data show that MIS inhibits the proliferation and differentiation of Leydig cells after EDS ablation of Leydig cells. The EDS regeneration model has been used by other investigators to recapitulate the rapid proliferation and differentiation of Leydig cells during pubertal maturation. We found that bilateral intratesticular administration of pharmacologic doses of MIS for 4 days markedly reduced the numbers of mesenchymal cells at an early stage of Leydig cell regeneration. At a later stage in the recovery process, the number of differentiated Leydig cells were one third lower in the MIS-treated group relative to control, while the number of mesenchymal cells was equivalent. These changes in Leydig cell numbers were accompanied by a decrease in the proliferative index of the mesenchymal Leydig cell precursors at Day 35 in animals treated with MIS. These data indicate that MIS inhibits proliferation of the Leydig cell progenitors, thereby decreasing the pool of precursors from which adult Leydig cells are derived by differentiation. This effect may have long-term consequences, as it appeared to be sustained. The difference in Leydig cell numbers was observed 3 wk after the last intratesticular injection of MIS, at a time when serum androgen concentrations are restored and the post-EDS regenerative process is nearly complete [4, 36].

The inhibitory effects of MIS on Leydig cell precursors are more potent than that of thyroid hormone, which has also been studied in the EDS depletion model [10]. Thyroid hormone decreased the numbers of mesenchymal-like cells by 8% on Day 14 and 26% on Day 21 while causing a near doubling of mature Leydig cells, suggesting that thyroid hormone stimulates the differentiation of progenitor cells to mature Leydig cells. The EDS depletion model was also used to evaluate the effects of the Kit ligand (also known as stem cell factor) on Leydig cells [11]. Kit ligand was observed to promote the regeneration of Leydig cells, most notably during the first 2 wk after EDS treatment. Kit ligand and MIS are both synthesized by Sertoli cells, indicating that regeneration and, by extension, pubertal development of Leydig cells are under local Sertoli cell paracrine control, with a balance between MIS-mediated inhibition and Kit-mediated stimulation determining the rates of these processes.

It has been reported that adult transgenic mice overexpressing MIS have 50% fewer immature and 80% fewer mature Leydig cells than wild-type littermates [14], whereas recombinant mice lacking MIS [16] or the MIS type II receptor [17] develop Leydig cell hyperplasia. As the adult complement of Leydig cells is generated during pubertal maturation of the testis, these findings suggest that MIS action during postnatal testicular development is essential to achieve normal Leydig cell numbers. We have previously demonstrated that primary Leydig cells express the MIS type II receptor and are responsive to MIS in vitro [13]. Although the secretion of MIS by Sertoli cells gradually declines after birth, it remains detectable in a stage-specific pattern even in the adult animal [37]. Moreover, the expression of the MIS type II receptor on Leydig cells increases from Day 9 to Day 14 and remains abundant in the pubertal and adult animal [13, 37]. With this developmental increase in receptor expression and presumably corresponding increase in responsiveness during the period of Leydig cell proliferation, we speculate that physiologic concentrations of MIS are sufficient to modulate Leydig cell numbers. Indeed, it is conceivable that the expression of MIS must be balanced between a minimal level that avoids Leydig cell hyperplasia and a maximal level to permit normal proliferation.

Our data demonstrated apoptotic interstitial cells in the MIS-treated testes whereas no apoptotic cells were observed in the vehicle-treated testes on Day 15. The finding of apoptosis in the interstitial cells was validated by our observation of TUNEL-positive germ cells, indicating apoptosis of germ cells due to testosterone deficiency after EDS treatment, as previously demonstrated [38]. Although TUNEL provides only preliminary evidence of apoptotic cell death in the Leydig cell precursors in this model of Leydig cell regeneration, MIS is known to indirectly induce apoptosis of ductal epithelial cells during Müllerian duct regression [3941] and causes apoptosis in the fetal lung [42]. Thus, it is conceivable that MIS employs a similar mechanism to inhibit the expansion in Leydig cell numbers after EDS ablation. We hypothesize that MIS modulates the numbers of mesenchymal Leydig cell precursors, in part, by inducing apoptosis, thereby using another mechanism to regulate Leydig cell regeneration in addition to its suppression of proliferative activity. This mechanism of action may also be at play during the regulation of normal peripubertal development.

Although serum testosterone and LH concentrations were similar between MIS-treated and control groups, the intratesticular androgen levels were higher in MIS-treated testes on Day 35, suggesting an increase in steroidogenic capacity, which would compensate for the decrease in Leydig cell numbers. This was supported by immunohistochemistry showing more intense steroidogenic enzyme expression in Leydig cells from MIS-treated testes. With MIS treatment, the Leydig cells may have a greater capacity for steroidogenesis due to higher expression of the LH receptor and thereby higher responsiveness to LH. The MIS treatment may induce a delay in the maturational changes in LH receptor expression that normally occur during puberty. We have previously observed that steady-state LH receptor mRNA levels are higher in immature compared with adult Leydig cells [43]. Thus, the regenerating Leydig cells in MIS-treated animals at 35 days post-EDS may have higher expression of the LH receptor, similar to that observed in the immature stage of Leydig cell development.

The temporal profile of androgens during recovery after EDS has been shown to be similar to that observed during normal pubertal maturation [44], confirming the utility of this model for the study of Leydig cell development. The speculation that MIS may induce a maturational delay in Leydig cell development is supported by the characteristic ratio of intratesticular androgens in the MIS-treated animals. During male reproductive development in Sprague-Dawley rats, 3{alpha}-diol is the predominant steroid in circulation during Days 15–40 postpartum [45], and the major intratesticular androgen in 2- to 4-wk old rats [46]. In contrast, testosterone production is predominant in sexually mature animals. The higher intratesticular concentration of 3{alpha}-diol as compared with testosterone in the MIS-treated animals is typical of immature pubertal animals and suggests a relative immaturity of the regenerating Leydig cells.

We conclude that MIS has a regulatory effect on adult Leydig cell regeneration after EDS-mediated depletion. MIS inhibits the proliferation of Leydig cell precursors and may promote their apoptotic cell death. This inhibitory effect exceeds the effect observed with thyroid hormone and is sufficient to reduce Leydig cell numbers, despite the short duration of the exposure in this experimental model. From the steroid data, we infer that the steroidogenic enzymes are maintained in a more immature profile by the exposure to MIS during recovery of Leydig cell numbers and differentiation of mesenchymal-like precursor cells to a steroidogenically mature Leydig cell. The developmental decline in expression of MIS in the prepubertal testis may permit the peripubertal proliferation of the Leydig cell progenitor cells to generate the full adult complement of Leydig cells. These findings, in conjunction with the Leydig cell phenotypes of mice with alterations in MIS expression, support a physiologic role for MIS in the regulation of adult Leydig cell numbers.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Gerson Rothschild for guidance on the methodology of TUNEL staining.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by NIH grants HD36768 and HD01367 to M.M.L. and HD32588 to M.P.H. This paper was originally published online, ahead of print with the title "Müllerian-Inhibiting Substance Prevents Rat Leydig Cell Regeneration after Ethylene Dimethanesulphate Ablation." Back

2 Correspondence: Mary M. Lee, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 308 Bell Building, Box 3080, Bell Research Drive, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. FAX: 919 684 8613; Lee00140{at}mc.duke.edu Back

Received: 25 July 2003.

First decision: 30 August 2003.

Accepted: 22 October 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Benton L, Shan LX, Hardy MP. Differentiation of adult Leydig cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1995 53:61-68[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Ewing LL, Keeney DS. Leydig cells: structure and function. In: Desjardins C, Ewing LL (eds.), Cell and Molecular Biology of the Testis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993:137–165
  3. Tapanainen J, Kuopio T, Pelliniemi LJ, Huhtaniemi I. Rat testicular endogenous steroids and the number of Leydig cells between the fetal period and sexual maturity. Biol Reprod 1984 31:1027-1035[Abstract]
  4. Kerr JB, Donachie K, Rommerts FF. Selective destruction and regeneration of rat Leydig cells in vivo. A new method for the study of seminiferous tubular-interstitial tissue interaction. Cell Tissue Res 1985 242:145-156[Medline]
  5. Morris ID. Leydig cell resistance to the cytotoxic effect of ethylene dimethanesulphonate in the adult rat testis. J Endocrinol 1985 105:311-316[Abstract]
  6. Bartlett JM, Kerr JB, Sharpe RM. The effect of selective destruction and regeneration of rat Leydig cells on the intratesticular distribution of testosterone and morphology of the seminiferous epithelium. J Androl 1986 7:240-253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Molenaar R, de Rooij DG, Rommerts FF, van der Molen HJ. Repopulation of Leydig cells in mature rats after selective destruction of the existent Leydig cells with ethylene dimethane sulfonate is dependent on luteinizing hormone and not follicle-stimulating hormone. Endocrinology 1986 118:2546-2554[Abstract]
  8. Kerr JB, Bartlett JM, Donachie K, Sharpe RM. Origin of regenerating Leydig cells in the testis of the adult rat. An ultrastructural, morphometric and hormonal assay study. Cell Tissue Res 1987 249:367-377[Medline]
  9. Tena-Sempere M, Rannikko A, Kero J, Zhang FP, Huhtaniemi IT. Molecular mechanisms of reappearance of luteinizing hormone receptor expression and function in rat testis after selective Leydig cell destruction by ethylene dimethane sulfonate. Endocrinology 1997 138:3340-3348[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ariyaratne HB, Mills N, Mason JI, Mendis-Handagama SM. Effects of thyroid hormone on Leydig cell regeneration in the adult rat following ethane dimethane sulphonate treatment. Biol Reprod 2000 63:1115-1123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Yan W, Kero J, Huhtaniemi I, Toppari J. Stem cell factor functions as a survival factor for mature Leydig cells and a growth factor for precursor Leydig cells after ethylene dimethane sulfonate treatment: implication of a role of the stem cell factor/c-Kit system in Leydig cell development. Dev Biol 2000 227:169-182[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Teixeira J, Maheswaran S, Donahoe P. Mullerian Inhibiting Substance: an instructive developmental hormone with diagnostic and possible therapeutic applications. Endocr Rev 2001 22:657-674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lee MM, Seah CC, Masiakos PT, Sottas CM, Preffer FI, Donahoe PK, MacLaughlin DT, Hardy MP. Mullerian Inhibiting Substance type II receptor expression and function in purified rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 1999 140:2819-2827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Racine C, Rey R, Forest M, Louis F, Ferre A, Huhtaniemi I, Josso N, Di Clemente N. Receptors for anti-Mullerian hormone on Leydig cells are responsible for its effects on steroidogenesis and cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998 95:594-599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lee MM. MIS Actions in the Developing Testis. In: Goldberg E (ed.), The Testis: From Stem Cell to Sperm Function. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000:30–42
  16. Behringer RR, Finegold MJ, Cate RL. Mullerian-inhibiting substance function during mammalian sexual development. Cell 1994 79:415-425[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Mishina Y, Rey R, Finegold MJ, Matzuk MM, Josso N, Cate RL, Behringer RL. Genetic analysis of the Mullerian-inhibiting substance signal transduction pathway in mammalian sexual differentiation. Genes Dev 1996 10:2577-2587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lyet L, Louis F, Forest MG, Josso N, Behringer RR, Vigier B. Ontogeny of reproductive abnormalities induced by deregulation of anti-Mullerian hormone expression in transgenic mice. Biol Reprod 1995 52:444-454[Abstract]
  19. Behringer RR, Cate RL, Froelick GJ, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL. Abnormal sexual development in transgenic mice chronically expressing Mullerian Inhibiting Substance. Nature 1990 345:167-170[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Sriraman V, Niu E, Matias J, Donahoe PK, MacLaughlin DT, Hardy MP, Lee MM. Mullerian Inhibiting Substance inhibits testosterone synthesis in adult rats. J Androl 2001 22:750-758[Abstract]
  21. Trbovich AM, Sluss PM, Laurich VM, O'Neill FH, MacLaughlin DT, Donahoe PK, Teixeira J. Mullerian Inhibiting Substance lowers testosterone in luteinizing hormone-stimulated rodents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 98:3393-3397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. MacLaughlin DT, Epstein J, Donahoe PK. Bioassay, purification, cloning, and expression of Mullerian Inhibiting Substance. Meth Enzymol 1991 198:358-369[Medline]
  23. Donahoe PK, Ito Y, Hendren WHI. A graded organ culture assay for the detection of Mullerian Inhibiting Substance. J Surg Res 1977 23:141-148[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Hudson PL, Dougas I, Donahoe PK, Cate RL, Epstein J, Pepinsky RB, MacLaughlin DT. An immunoassay to detect human Mullerian Inhibiting Substance in males and females during normal development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990 70:16-22[Abstract]
  25. di Clemente N, Ghaffari S, Pepinsky RB, Pieau C, Josso N, Cate RL, Vigier B. A quantitative and interspecific test for biological activity of anti-Mullerian hormone: the fetal ovary aromatase assay. Development 1992 114:721-727[Abstract]
  26. Sprando RL, Santulli R, Awoniyi CA, Ewing LL, Zirkin BR. Does ethane 1,2-dimethanesulphonate (EDS) have a direct cytotoxic effect on the seminiferous epithelium of the rat testis?. J Androl 1990 11:344-352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Hardy MP, Zirkin BR, Ewing LL. Kinetic studies on the development of the adult population of Leydig cells in testes of the pubertal rat. Endocrinology 1989 124:762-770[Abstract]
  28. Mendis-Handagama SM. Estimation error of Leydig cell numbers in atrophied rat testes due to the assumption of spherical nuclei. J Microsc 1992 168:Pt 125-32[Medline]
  29. Mendis-Handagama SM, Keeney DS, Hardy MP, Ewing LL. Application of the dissector method to enumerate cells in the testis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1989 564:86-98[Medline]
  30. Sorensen FB. Unbiased stereologic techniques for practical use in diagnostic histopathology. Pathologica 1995 87:263-278[Medline]
  31. Wreford NG. Theory and practice of stereological techniques applied to the estimation of cell number and nuclear volume in the testis. Microsc Res Tech 1995 32:423-436[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Cochran R, Ewing L, Niswender G. Serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, testosterone, 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone, 5{alpha}-androstane-3{alpha}, 17ß-diol, 5{alpha}-androstane-3ß-, 17ß-diol, and 17ß-estradiol from male beagles with spontaneous or induced benign prostatic hyperplasia. Invest Urol 1981 19:142-147[Medline]
  33. Knorr D, Vanha-Perittula T, Lipsett M. Structure and function of rat testis through pubescence. Endocrinology 1970 86:1298-1304[Medline]
  34. Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA. Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. J Cell Biol 1992 119:493-501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Viger RS, Robaire B. Steady state steroid 5 alpha-reductase messenger ribonucleic acid levels and immunocytochemical localization of the type 1 protein in the rat testis during postnatal development. Endocrinology 1995 136:5409-5415[Abstract]
  36. Morris ID, McCluckie JA. Temporal changes in serum androgen after temporary impairment of Leydig cell function by ethane-1,2-dimethane sulphonate. J Steroid Biochem 1979 10:467-469[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Baarends WM, Hoogerbrugge JW, Post M, Visser JA, De Rooij DG, Parvinen M, Themmen AP, Grootegoed JA. Anti-Mullerian hormone and anti-Mullerian hormone type II receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression during postnatal testis development and in the adult testis of the rat. Endocrinology 1995 136:5614-5622[Abstract]
  38. Nandi S, Banerjee PP, Zirkin BR. Germ cell apoptosis in the testes of Sprague Dawley rats following testosterone withdrawal by ethane 1,2-dimethanesulfonate administration: relationship to Fas?. Biol Reprod 1999 61:70-75[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Price J, Donahoe P, Ito Y, Hendren III W. Programmed cell death in the Mullerian duct induced by Mullerian Inhibiting Substance. Am J Anat 1977 149:353-376[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Ingraham HA, Hirokawa Y, Roberts LM, Mellon SH, McGee E, Nachtigal MW, Visser JA. Autocrine and paracrine Mullerian Inhibiting Substance hormone signaling in reproduction. Recent Prog Horm Res 2000 55:53-67 67-58 (discussion)
  41. Allard S, Adin P, Gouedard L, di Clemente N, Josso N, Orgebin-Crist MC, Picard JY, Xavier F. Molecular mechanisms of hormone-mediated Mullerian duct regression: involvement of beta-catenin. Development 2000 127:3349-3360[Abstract]
  42. Catlin EA, Tonnu VC, Ebb RG, Pacheco BA, Manganaro TF, Ezzell RM, Donahoe PK, Teixeira J. Mullerian Inhibiting Substance inhibits branching morphogenesis and induces apoptosis in fetal rat lung. Endocrinology 1997 138:790-796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Shan LX, Hardy MP. Developmental changes in levels of luteinizing hormone receptor and androgen receptor in rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 1992 131:1107-1114[Abstract]
  44. Myers RB, Abney TO. Interstitial cell proliferation in the testis of the ethylene dimethane sulfonate-treated rat. Steroids 1991 56:91-96[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Moger WH. Serum 5alpha-androstane-3alpha,17beta-diol, androsterone, and testosterone concentrations in the male rat. Influence of age and gonadotropin stimulation. Endocrinology 1977 100:1027-1032[Abstract]
  46. Corpechot C, Baulieu EE, Robel P. Testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and androstanediols in plasma, testes and prostates of rats during development. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1981 96:127-135[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
IN MEMORIAM Matthew P. Hardy, Ph.D. 1957-2007
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2008; 78(3): 563 - 564.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
M. Bielinska, S. Kiiveri, H. Parviainen, S. Mannisto, M. Heikinheimo, and D. B. Wilson
Gonadectomy-induced Adrenocortical Neoplasia in the Domestic Ferret (Mustela putorius furo) and Laboratory Mouse.
Vet. Pathol., February 1, 2006; 43(2): 97 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. L. Barreiro, R. Pineda, F. Gaytan, M. Archanco, M. A. Burrell, J. M. Castellano, H. Hakovirta, M. Nurmio, L. Pinilla, E. Aguilar, et al.
Pattern of Orexin Expression and Direct Biological Actions of Orexin-A in Rat Testis
Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5164 - 5175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Ramaswamy
Pubertal Augmentation in Juvenile Rhesus Monkey Testosterone Production Induced by Invariant Gonadotropin Stimulation Is Inhibited by Estrogen
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5866 - 5875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. De Gendt, N. Atanassova, K. A. L. Tan, L. R. de Franca, G. G. Parreira, C. McKinnell, R. M. Sharpe, P. T. K. Saunders, J. I. Mason, S. Hartung, et al.
Development and Function of the Adult Generation of Leydig Cells in Mice with Sertoli Cell-Selective or Total Ablation of the Androgen Receptor
Endocrinology, September 1, 2005; 146(9): 4117 - 4126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
X. Wu, R. Arumugam, S. P. Baker, and M. M. Lee
Pubertal and Adult Leydig Cell Function in Mullerian Inhibiting Substance-Deficient Mice
Endocrinology, February 1, 2005; 146(2): 589 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. R. Kumar
Divide and Differentiate: Ghrelin Instructs the Leydig Cells
Endocrinology, November 1, 2004; 145(11): 4822 - 4824.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. L. Barreiro, F. Gaytan, J. M. Castellano, J. S. Suominen, J. Roa, M. Gaytan, E. Aguilar, C. Dieguez, J. Toppari, and M. Tena-Sempere
Ghrelin Inhibits the Proliferative Activity of Immature Leydig Cells in Vivo and Regulates Stem Cell Factor Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Expression in Rat Testis
Endocrinology, November 1, 2004; 145(11): 4825 - 4834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/3/600    most recent
biolreprod.103.021550v2
biolreprod.103.021550v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salva, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salva, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Salva, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS