Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print November 12, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.021840
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/3/759    most recent
biolreprod.103.021840v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Otala, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dunkel, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Otala, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dunkel, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Otala, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dunkel, L.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 70, 759–767 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.021840
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Testis

Protection from Radiation-Induced Male Germ Cell Loss by Sphingosine-1-Phosphate1

Marjut Otala3, Laura Suomalainen2,3, Markku O. Pentikäinen4, Petri Kovanen4, Mikko Tenhunen6, Krista Erkkilä3, Jorma Toppari5, and Leo Dunkel3

Programme for Developmental and Reproductive Biology,3 Biomedicum Helsinki and Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Helsinki, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland Wihuri Research Institute,4 FIN-00140, Helsinki, Finland Departments of Pediatrics and Physiology,5 University of Turku, FIN-20520, Turku, Finland Department of Oncology,6 Helsinki University Hospital, FIN-00029, Helsinki, Finland


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Male germ cells are susceptible to radiation-induced injury, and infertility is a common problem after total-body irradiation. Here we investigated, first, the effects of irradiation on germ cells in mouse testis and, second, the role of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) treatment in radiation-induced male germ cell loss. Irradiation of mouse testes mainly damaged the early developmental stages of spermatogonia. The damage was seen by means of DNA flow cytometry 21 days after irradiation as decreasing numbers of spermatocytes and spermatids with increasing amounts of ionizing radiation (0.1–2.0 Gy). Intratesticular injections of S1P given 1–2 h before irradiation (0.5 Gy) did not protect against short-term germ cell loss as measured by in situ end labeling of DNA fragmentation 16 h after irradiation. However, after 21 days, in the S1P-treated testes, the numbers of primary spermatocytes and spermatogonia at G2 (4C peak as measured by flow cytometry) were higher at all stages of spermatogenesis compared with vehicle-treated testes, indicating protection of early spermatogonia by S1P, whereas the spermatid (1C) populations were similar. In conclusion, S1P appears to protect partially (16%–47%) testicular germ cells against radiation-induced cell death. This warrants further studies aimed at development of therapeutic agents capable of blocking sphingomyelin-induced pathways of germ cell loss.

apoptosis, male reproductive tract, spermatogenesis, stress, testis


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Spermatogenesis is a complex process of male germ cell proliferation and maturation from spermatogonia to spermatozoa. It takes place in the seminiferous tubules of the testis, in which spermatogenic cells are arranged in distinct cell associations called the stages of the seminiferous epithelium [1]. In the testis, physiological apoptotic death of selected germ cells plays an important role in limiting the germ cell population [2, 3]. Moreover, stress caused by external disturbances such as chemotherapy or irradiation can cause increased testicular apoptosis leading to total germ cell loss. Spermatogonia are especially sensitive to irradiation; doses as low as 0.1 Gy are known to cause damage to these cells [46]. Consistently, less than 2% of men who have received total-body irradiation are able to father a child later in life [7]. For adult men, cryopreservation of sperm is a valid method to preserve fertility, but for prepubertal boys, the only way to preserve fertility is to protect the spermatogonia in vivo [8].

The ability to control early intracellular events that signal the activation of cell death is a potentially important target in protection of radiation-induced germ cell loss. Sphingolipids, which are widely distributed in cell membranes, have been implicated in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis [9]. Ceramide is metabolized from cell membrane sphingomyelin by sphingomyelinases, which are activated by a variety of stress factors such as anticancer drugs, ionizing radiation, tumor necrosis factor {alpha}, Fas ligand, and also by growth factor withdrawal and oxidative stress [10]. Additionally, ceramide can be synthetized de novo by ceramide synthetase [10]. Ceramide acts as a mediator of cell-growth arrest and apoptosis in many tissues and cell lines. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), in turn, is formed by phosphorylation of a metabolite of ceramide, sphingosine, by sphingosine kinase [11]. In contrast with the growth-inhibitory and proapoptotic actions of ceramide and sphingosine, S1P regulates diverse processes such as cellular growth, inhibition of ceramide-mediated apoptosis, and cell migration [12].

Morita et al. have reported that radiation-induced premature ovarian failure can be prevented in female mice by protecting the ovaries by means of S1P before irradiation. S1P-treated ovaries retained a normal distribution of follicles as well as overall tissue mass [13]. No genetic anomalies in progeny of the irradiated mothers were found [14]. This encouraging result in female mice prompted us to study whether S1P would also be able to protect male germ cells from irradiation-induced cell death.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mice

All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Wihuri Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland. Wild-type C57BL/6 male mice were obtained from the University of Helsinki experimental animal facilities. All mice were young male adults, 8–10 wk of age.

Study Design

In the irradiation and S1P experiments, the mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 600–800 µl 1.25% Avertin (2,2,2-tribromoethanol in tert-amyl-alcohol; 1600 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) 1–2 h before irradiation. The mice received a dose of 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 Gy total-body irradiation at the Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Irradiation was performed with a Varian Clinac 600C linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) using a 6-MV photon beam and a dose rate of 2 Gy/min. The mice were placed in a prone position in a plastic box and irradiated by means of a single posterior field covering the whole box + 2 cm margin to achieve maximum uniformity of dose distribution. The absorbed dose was calculated at a depth of 2 cm. In addition, a 1.5-cm-thick Plexiglas absorber was added at the entrance side of the field to obtain a full-dose build-up. The effects of irradiation and S1P was studied from two time points. The first time point (16 h) was chosen because apoptosis of the rat testicular germ cells, which starts approximately 8 h after irradiation, increases to maximum effect at about 16 h [15]. The second time point (21 days) was selected because differentiation of mouse testicular germ cells from early spermatogonia to spermatocytes and to spermatids lasts approximately 9 and 18 days, respectively (see Fig. 3). Thus, 21 days after irradiation, apoptosis of the spermatogonia that had taken place at the time of irradiation can be observed as a reduction in the 4C population of spermatocytes and the 1C population of spermatids by DNA flow cytometry.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Schematic illustration of the structure of mouse seminiferous epithelium (modified from Pentikäinen et al. [20] and Yan et al. [39]). Differentiation of early spermatogonia to spermatocytes and to spermatids lasts approximately 9 and 18 days, respectively (arrows). Spermatogonia dying of irradiation-induced apoptosis are shown with a light gray background. Twenty-one days after irradiation, apoptosis of spermatogonia damaged at the time of irradiation is observed as a reduction in the 4C population of spermatocytes and the 1C population of spermatids (dark gray background). The specific cell associations in the vertical columns represent spermatogenic stages of the epithelial cycle (Roman numerals). Apr, A-paired spermatogonia; Aal, A-aligned spermatogonia; A1–A4, type A1–4 spermatogonia; In, intermediate spermatogonia; B, type B spermatogonia; PI, preleptotene spermatocytes; L, leptotene spermatocytes; Z, zygotene spermatocytes; Sp, spermatocytes; Di, diplotene spermatocytes; M, meiotically dividing spermatocytes; Sd, spermatids

Irradiation Experiments

Sixteen hours after 0-, 0.5-, or 1.0-Gy irradiation, the mice (n = 6) were anesthetized by CO2 and killed by cervical dislocation, and tissue samples were collected in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for electron microscopic studies. Twenty-one days after 0-, 0.1-, 0.5-, 1.0-, or 2.0-Gy irradiation, the mice (n = 12) were anesthetized by CO2 and killed by cervical dislocation; then the testes were weighed and, after stage-specific preparations of seminiferous tubules, DNA flow cytometric analyses were performed.

S1P Experiments

For the control group of animals (n = 3), 30 µl of vehicle containing 5% polyethylene glycol, 2.5% ethanol, and 0.8% Tween-80 in phosphate-buffered saline (PET-PBS) was injected once intratesticularly into the right testis while the left one remained as an untreated control. For S1P-treated mice (n = 8), 30 µl of 50 µM S1P in PET-PBS (Biomol, Plymouth Meeting, PA) was injected once into the right testis and 30 µl of 200 µM S1P in PET-PBS once into the left testis.

At the 16-h time point, the effect of S1P on 0.5-Gy irradiation-induced rapid germ cell demise was studied from stage-specific squash preparations by in situ end-labeling (ISEL) analysis of DNA fragmentation. Also, after irradiation doses of 0.5 and 1.0 Gy, tissue samples were collected in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for electron microscopic studies.

At the 21-day time point, after stage-specific preparation of seminiferous tubules, the long-term effects of S1P on 0.5-Gy irradiation-induced apoptosis were studied by DNA flow cytometry.

Seminiferous Tubule Preparations

Sixteen hours or 21 days after total-body irradiation, the testes were decapsulated in phosphate-buffered saline in a Petri dish, the seminiferous tubules were gently teased apart, and three 1-mm-long segments of seminiferous tubules at each of the stages II–V, VI–VIII, and IX–XII per mouse were prepared under a transillumination stereomicroscope (MS 5; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) [1618].

In Situ End-Labeling of Apoptotic DNA

Isolated 1-mm segments of seminiferous tubules were transferred in 10 µl of PBS on silan-coated microscope slides and the samples then squashed by placing a coverslip on top so that the cells within the tubule segments produced a monolayer around both ends of the tubule segments. The samples were fixed, dehydrated, and stored as described previously [19]. DNA 3' end labeling was performed as described previously [20, 21]. In brief, after rehydration, the samples were microwaved for 5 min in 10 mM citric acid (pH 6) for antigen retrieval, preincubated with terminal transferase reaction buffer (potassium cacodylate, 1 mol/L; Tris-HCl, 125 mmol/L; BSA, 1.25 mg/ml; pH 6.6) and 3' end labeled with digoxigenin-dideoxy-UTP (Dig-dd-UTP; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) by means of the terminal transferase (Tdt; Roche) reaction at 37°C for 1 h. Dig-dd-UTP-labeled DNA was visualized by antidigoxigenin antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Anti-Digoxigenin-POD; Roche) and diaminobenzidine (Sigma). The slides were counterstained lightly with hematoxylin before dehydration and mounting.

Electron Microscopy

Stage-specific segments of the seminiferous tubules were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer and embedded in epoxy resin. The tissue blocks were sectioned at 50 nm with an ultramicrotome (Reichert Jung, Vienna, Austria) and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate using Leica EMstain apparatus (Leica). The samples were examined with a JEOL JEM 1200 EX transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at the Institute of Biotechnology, Electron Microscopy Unit.

DNA Flow Cytometry

DNA flow cytometric analyses after irradiation were performed as described previously, with some modifications [18, 22]. Stage-specific 1-mm-long single segments of seminiferous tubules were treated with a detergent (0.3% Nonidet P-40; BDH, Poole, England) in PBS containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and ribonuclease A (5 µg/ml; Sigma) for 10–15 min at 4°C, followed by a 10-sec vortex mix and incubation for 10 min at 37°C. Propidium iodide (25 µg/ml; Sigma) was added to the samples for staining of the nuclei, and 10 µl of diluted fluorescent particle solution (500 beads/µl, TrueCount Beads; Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) was added to each sample as an internal volume standard for the quantification of absolute cell numbers. The samples were filtered through 45-µm metal strainers (Retsch, Haan, Germany) and 200 µl of PBS was added to each sample to increase the volume. The samples were analyzed by means of a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) using an excitation wavelength of 488 nm. A total of 5000 fluorescent impulses were counted excluding the beads that were gated out of the rest of the sample. The number of nuclei in each peak of the DNA histograms was calculated using CellQuest Pro software (Becton Dickinson) and converted to absolute numbers using the internal standard. The 1C population consists of step 1–12 spermatids. The 1C' population consists of step 13–16 spermatids, which bind less propidium iodide than step 1–12 spermatids and therefore form a hypohaploid peak. The 4C population consists mainly of primary spermatocytes (except for preleptotene spermatocytes that are dispersed in the S-phase and the 2C peak, depicting chromatin synthesis and diploid chromatids, respectively) but also of spermatogonia (G2/M) [18].

Data Presentation and Statistical Analysis

At the 16-h time point, the Mann-Whitney test was used to test differences in apoptotic cell counts between the S1P-treated and nontreated groups. Average counts from three to five squash preparations per testis were used and the amounts of apoptotic cells were expressed as percentages of the total numbers of cells in the samples.

At the 21-day time point, differences in cell numbers between the radiation dose groups within the three stages among the 1C and 4C populations were tested by one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett test. The same method was used when testing the effect of S1P on cell numbers as well as for testing the effect of dose of radiation on testicular weight. One to three tubule segment measurements per stage per testis were used in the statistical analyses of cell numbers. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Dose-Dependent Decrease of Testicular Weight after Irradiation

The weights of the testes decreased 21 days after irradiation (n = 3) (Fig. 1). A significant decrease in testis weight was already seen after 0.5-Gy irradiation, the weight being 77% (P < 0.05) of the nonirradiated testes. After 2.0 Gy, the decrease in testis weight was 44% (P < 0.05).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Testicular weights 21 days after irradiation. The weights of the testes decreased with increasing doses of radiation, with the mean weight of the testes irradiated with a dose of 0.1 Gy being 96% of the mean of the nonirradiated testes. Doses of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 Gy resulted in decreases of 23%, 30%, and 44%, respectively. Each value represents the mean of three testes from different animals ± SEM. ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05

Morphological Changes in Testicular Tissue 16 h after Irradiation

Using electron microscopic analysis, the most common type of cell death caused by irradiation was found to be apoptosis. All spermatogenic stages had some apoptotic germ cells in nonirradiated samples (Fig. 2). In both nonirradiated and irradiated samples, the morphological signs of apoptosis were most frequently found in germ cells, particularly in spermatogonia. Occasional apoptotic germ cells other than spermatogonia, i.e., spermatocytes and spermatids, were also seen. Apoptosis of the germ cells ranged from early apoptosis, in which the nuclear chromatin had started clumping, to later phases of apoptosis, in which, in addition to the chromatin, the cytoplasm had become condensed and no cytoplasmic organelles could be discerned. In very late phases of cell death, neither the specific cell type nor the type of cell death could be identified (Fig. 2, A–C). In S1P-treated segments of seminiferous tubules, occasional apoptotic cells (mainly spermatogonia) were observed, whereas most of the germ cells had retained their normal appearance 16 h after irradiation, thus indicating that S1P in itself did not induce morphological changes (Fig. 2, D–E).



View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Electron micrographs of testicular tissue from mouse testes 16 h after 0.5-Gy irradiation. AC) Different stages of apoptosis in spermatogonia situated near the basal lamina. A) Early apoptosis of a spermatogonium. Condensation of chromatin can be observed (arrowhead) but the cytoplasm is of normal appearance. B) At a later stage of apoptosis, condensation of chromatin is more advanced and cytoplasmic organelles are losing their normal structures. C) Degenerating cell at an advanced stage of cell death. At this phase of death, neither the dying cell type nor the mode of cell death can be identified. DE) S1P-treated (200 µM) testicular cells. D) Normal spermatogonia and Sertoli cells from stages II–V. E) Normal spermatids, which show typical morphology of stage V. Scale bar 2 = µm

Irradiation Increases the Amount of Testicular Germ Cell Apoptosis Dose Dependently

In the mouse, differentiation of germ cells from early spermatogonia to spermatocytes and to spermatids lasts approximately 9 and 18 days, respectively (Fig. 3). Twenty-one days after irradiation, apoptosis of the spermatogonia that had taken place at the time of irradiation was observed as a reduction in the 4C population of spermatocytes and the 1C population of spermatids by DNA flow cytometry (Fig. 4). The amount of cells in the 1C and 4C populations markedly decreased with increasing dose of irradiation (n = 3) (Fig. 4 and Table 1). This was seen more clearly in the 1C than in the 4C cell population and the effects of radiation were most prominent in stages II–V and VII–VIII (Table 1). In stages II–V, the decrease in the 1C cell population was already statistically significant after 0.1-Gy irradiation, the decrease being 31% vs. nonirradiated testes (n = 3) (P < 0.05). After 2.0 Gy, the decrease in the 1C cell population was 92%. In stages VII–VIII, the decrease in the 1C cell population was significant after 0.5-Gy irradiation, the loss of cells being 75% vs. nonirradiated testes (n = 3). After 2.0 Gy, the decrease in the cell population was 97% (n = 3). In the 4C population, the effect of irradiation on germ cell population was statistically significant after 1.0 Gy in stages II–V and VII–VIII, the decreases being 74% and 73%, respectively (n = 3). In stages IX–XII, a statistically significant decrease of 77% was observed after 2.0-Gy irradiation (n = 3). In nonirradiated testes, which were treated with vehicle alone (n = 3) or with 200 µM S1P (n = 4), the 1C and 4C populations did not differ from those in nonirradiated, nontreated testes (Table 1).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Cell populations 21 days after irradiation. The numbers of cells in the 1C and 4C populations clearly decreased with increasing doses of irradiation. In stages II–V, the total numbers of cells decreased significantly after doses of 1.0 and 2.0 Gy. In stages VII–VIII, the numbers of cells decreased after all doses except 0.1 Gy. In stages IX–XII, the total numbers of cells decreased only after the dose of 2.0 Gy. Each value represents the mean of 3–4 testes from different animals ± SEM. ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Numbers of cells 21 days after different amounts of irradiation and S1P treatment.*

The Effects of S1P on Male Germ Cell Death 16 h after Irradiation

Sixteen hours after irradiation, in stage-specific squash preparations for in situ end labeling of DNA fragmentation (ISEL), no statistically significant differences were found between nontreated (n = 4) and 50 µM or 200 µM S1P-treated groups (n = 4), although a statistically nonsignificant trend toward lower amounts of ISEL-positive cells was detected in stages II–V and IX–XII (Fig. 5A). Consistent with the EM analysis, no additional morphological changes induced by S1P in itself were observed in the squash preparations (Fig. 5B).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Numbers of ISEL-positive germ cells 16 h after irradiation. A) Sixteen hours after 0.5-Gy irradiation, apoptotic germ cells were measured in stage-specific squash preparations of nonirradiated, nontreated and S1P-treated seminiferous tubules by ISEL analysis. A trend toward apoptosis inhibition was seen in stages II–V and IX–XII positive cells/mm tubule. Values are mean ± SEM. B) ISEL analysis of DNA fragmentation 16 h after irradiation. After irradiation, seminiferous tubules were prepared stage specifically, squashed, and fixed. Apoptotic cells were detected by in situ 3' end labeling of apoptotic DNA and the overall morphology examined. The micrographs represent stages IX–XII, where a trend toward lower numbers of apoptotic cells was detectable. The overall morphology of the germ cells (except the apoptotic cells) after S1P treatment and/or 0.5-Gy irradiation appeared to be normal. Only a few apoptotic cells were observed in the samples treated with vehicle (vehicle control). The number of apoptotic cells (brown cells) was higher in 0.5-Gy-irradiated samples (vehicle + 0.5 Gy). Fewer apoptotic germ cells were seen in samples treated with 200 µM S1P than with vehicle before 0.5-Gy irradiation (S1P + 0.5 Gy). Original magnification x400

The Effects of S1P on Testicular Germ Cell Number 21 Days after Irradiation

Twenty-one days after 0.5-Gy irradiation, a significant reduction in the number of spermatids in the 1C population (i.e., that were spermatogonia at the time of irradiation) was seen at stages II–V and VII–VIII when compared with the nonirradiated samples (Table 1). At stages IX–XII, in turn, irradiation did not cause a statistically significant reduction in the number of any cells in the 1C population (Table 1). Thus, in the 1C population, S1P could not prevent germ cell loss caused by 0.5-Gy irradiation.

In the 4C population of spermatocytes (i.e., which had been spermatogonia at the time of irradiation) 21 days after irradiation, a significant decrease in the cell numbers were seen in vehicle-treated control mice at every stage. In contrast, 21 days after S1P treatment and 0.5-Gy irradiation, the number of cells in the irradiated plus S1P-treated mice (at every stage) did not significantly differ from the number of cells in nonirradiated control mice (Table 1 and Fig. 6). At stages II–V, the cell numbers from S1P-treated animals were 16% and 34% higher after those treatments with 50 µM and 200 µM S1P, respectively, than in irradiated and vehicle-treated animals (Table 1 and Fig. 6). At stages VII–VIII, this effect of S1P treatment was clearer, total cell numbers being 35% and 47% higher than in the irradiated, vehicle treated animals (Table 1 and Fig. 6). Finally, at stages IX–XII, the cell numbers in the S1P-treated animals were 40% and 38% higher than in the irradiated, vehicle-treated animals (Table 1 and Fig. 6).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Spermatocytes 21 days after S1P treatment and 0.5-Gy irradiation. A) In the 1C population, the numbers of cells at stages II–V and VII–VIII were reduced significantly in the control group as well as in the S1P-treated groups after irradiation. At stages IX–XI, irradiation did not cause a statistically significant reduction in the numbers of cells. B) In the 4C population, irradiation reduced the number of cells significantly at all stages studied (II–V, VII–VIII, and IX–XII) in the vehicle-treated testes. After S1P treatment and 0.5-Gy irradiation, the number of cells was not significantly lower at any stage (II–V, VII–VII, and IX–XII) than the number of 4C cells in nonirradiated controls. Each value represents the mean number of cells in 3–4 testes from different animals ± SEM. ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The aim of this study was to investigate whether S1P is able to preserve testicular germ cells from irradiation. We found that the differentiating spermatogonia were the cell types most vulnerable to radiation-induced damage because, 21 days after irradiation, the populations of spermatocytes and spermatids decreased considerably, depending on the dose of irradiation. Furthermore, cell numbers decreased more in the 1C than in the 4C population. This is likely to be a result of the greater population of primary spermatocytes than differentiating spermatogonia, which after 21 days would have formed the 1C population of spermatids. These spermatocytes divide five times more than spermatogonia, which, after 21 days, have differentiated to spermatocytes (4C population).

Exposure of mice to irradiation doses of up to 5 Gy has previously been demonstrated to increase germ cell death significantly, the changes being most prominent among the B spermatogonia, as examined by electron microscopy and TUNEL analysis [23]. Also recently, irradiation of mouse spermatogonia with 0.25 and 4 Gy produced a dose-related increase in DNA damage in sperm collected 45 days later as measured by the Comet assay [24]. The epithelial cycle has been previously shown to divide into two parts with different responses to 1-Gy irradiation [25]. Stages III–VII were demonstrated to correspond to an area with high sensitivity to irradiation. In stages VII–VIII, in turn, the sensitivity to irradiation was reduced, suggesting this radiosensitivity to be dependent on the proliferative activity of the stem cells [25]. Accordingly, the radiosensitivity of the undifferentiated spermatogonia, which are committed to differentiate, varied according to the activity of the cell cycle; in stages III–VII, the D0 value was 0.4–0.7 Gy; in stages XII/I, the D0 was 1.0 Gy; and in stages IX–X, 2.2. Gy [26]. These results are in agreement with our findings, in which the number of differentiating spermatogonia reduces significantly after 0.1 Gy in stages II–V and after 0.5 Gy in stages II–V and VII–VIII, whereas in stages IX–XII, a statistically significant decrease is detected only after 2.0 Gy, as measured by DNA flow cytometry 21 days after irradiation. Here, the model for DNA flow cytometric analyses of mouse spermatogenesis 21 days after irradiation were based on studies made in rat [22]. In the present work, we show that, despite differences between species in stage-specific characters in DNA histograms of flow cytometry [18], flow cytometry is a valid method to quantify irradiation-induced testicular apoptosis in mice.

In the rat testis, germ cell apoptosis starts within minutes after irradiation and the number of apoptotic cells increases until about 16 h [15]. In the present study on the mouse, only trends toward lower amounts of ISEL-positive germ cells in S1P-protected testes could be seen at the 16-h time point when compared with the nontreated testes. Because physiological death of selected spermatocytes and spermatids is a common feature of normal spermatogenesis [2, 3], the total amount of dying germ cells may have masked the protective effect of S1P on spermatogonia at this time point. Probably therefore, the protection of differentiating spermatogonia by S1P could be seen only 21 days after irradiation as a decrease in number of 4C cells in irradiated but not in irradiated plus S1P-treated testes.

The sphingomyelin pathway seems to be important in somatic testicular cells. In porcine Sertoli cells, sphingomyelin hydrolysis pathway was related to production of lactate, a crucial energetic metabolite for germ cells [27]. Further, in rat Leydig cells, ceramide-dependent pathway regulated hCG-stimulated Leydig cell steroidogenesis at the level of cAMP production and at post-cAMP events [28]. Ceramide generation was also completely blocked by ceramide synthetase inhibitor Fumonisin B1 and exogenous ceramide itself was shown to directly induce apoptosis of rat Leydig cells in vitro [29]. It is becoming clear that the specialized functions required for proper proliferation and differentiation of the spermatogonial stem cells are mainly provided by the neighboring differentiated Sertoli cells [3034]. Concomitantly, fine architecture of the seminiferous epithelium and the interactions between different types of seminiferous epithelial cells, e.g., Sertoli and Leydig cells, are crucial for spermatogenesis. The sphingomyelin pathway may thus have a role in paracrine control of germ cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival provided by the Sertoli cells. Further, acid sphingomyelinase knockout mice that lack one of the enzymes that converts sphingomyelin to ceramide was found to have pathological testicular tissue and sperm due to lipid accumulation, but the quantitative process of sperm formation was not impaired [35]. We, on the other hand, demonstrated recently that ceramide levels increase during serum withdrawal-induced human male germ cell apoptosis in vitro and that this apoptosis is partly (30%) inhibited by S1P [36]. Thus, in male germ cells, the sphingomyelin pathway may not be the primary initial transduction pathway of apoptosis but may serve as an alternative route of the programmed cell death.

The intracellular balance between the sphingolipid second messengers S1P and ceramide may determine whether the cell will survive or die [11]. Even though, in several cell lines, the inhibitory effect of S1P on apoptosis is related to caspase 3, inhibition of human male germ cell apoptosis has been suggested to be caspase 3 independent [36, 37]. Moreover, S1P has been identified as a ligand for the G-protein coupled EDG-1–3, -5, -6 (S1P1–5) receptors [38]. At present, their possible roles in the regulation of male germ cell apoptosis, however, is unclear. Thus, regulation of male germ cell death seems to involve several parallel and even uncharacterized apoptotic pathways.

Recently, mating trials revealed that S1P-based protection of female germ cells from irradiation was not associated with genomic damage at anatomical, histological, biochemical, or cytogenetic levels [14]. Our present results suggest that, also in males, S1P may have some role in protection of germ cells against irradiation, although the number of animals used in this study was limited. Moreover, although it acts upstream in apoptosis cascades, whether S1P protects male germ cells upstream or downstream of DNA damage caused by irradiation remains unclear. More work needs to be done before sphingolipid pathways of testicular germ cells could be considered as therapeutic targets in protecting male gonads from apoptosis induced by external stress such as cancer therapy. Therefore, the discussion about its therapeutic potential in the males should be only speculative.

In conclusion, we have shown that S1P moderately protects the very early stages of spermatogenesis from irradiation-induced apoptosis. This effect is seen in the A-paired spermatogonia that develop into the 4C population, which consists mainly of spermatocytes 3 wk after irradiation. This may reflect that apoptosis at these very early developmental stages may be more dependent on the sphingomyelin pathway than apoptosis of germ cells in the later steps of spermatogenesis.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are grateful to Ms. Virpi Ahokas, Ms. Sinikka Heikkilä, and Ms. Virpi Päivinen for their excellent technical assistance. We also thank Dr. Leena Latonen and Mr. Jouko Lukkarinen for their pleasant cooperation with flow cytometry analyses and Dr. Gloria Perez for her valuable advice and Dr. Tiina Laine for her valuable comments.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by the Foundation for Pediatric Research (Finland), the Pediatric Graduate School (Finland), the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation (Finland), the Cancer Society of Finland, the Nona and Kullervo Väre Foundation (Finland), and Helsinki Biomedical Graduate School (Finland), Research and Science Foundation of Farmos (Finland). M.O. and L.S. contributed equally to this work. Back

2 Correspondence: Laura Suomalainen, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Programme for Developmental and Reproductive Biology (5th Floor, Room B529b), Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 700, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. FAX: 358 9 4717 1947; laura.suomalainen{at}hus.fi Back

Received: 1 August 2003.

First decision: 28 August 2003.

Accepted: 10 November 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Clermont Y. Quantitative analysis of spermatogenesis of the rat: a revised model for the renewal of spermatogonia. Am J Anat 1962 111:111-129
  2. Furuchi T, Masuko K, Nishimune Y, Obinata M, Matsui Y. Inhibition of testicular germ cell apoptosis and differentiation in mice misexpressing Bcl-2 in spermatogonia. Development 1996 122:1703-1709[Abstract]
  3. Bartke A. Apoptosis of male germ cells, a generalized or a cell type-specific phenomenon?. Endocrinology 1995 136:3-4[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Oakberg EF. Sensitivity and time of degeneration of spermatogenic cells irradiated in various stages of maturation in the mouse. Rad Res 1955 2:369-391
  5. Oakberg EF. Degeneration of spermatogonia of the mouse following exposure to X rays, and stages in the mitotic cycle at which cell death occurs. J Morphol 1955 97:39-54[CrossRef]
  6. Kovacs GT, Stern K. Reproductive aspects of cancer treatment: an update. Med J Aust 1999 170:495-497[Medline]
  7. Costabile RA. The effects of cancer and cancer therapy on male reproductive function. J Urol 1993 149:1327-1330[Medline]
  8. Aslam I, Fishel S, Moore H, Dowell K, Thornton S. Fertility preservation of boys undergoing anti-cancer therapy: a review of the existing situation and prospects for the future. Hum Reprod 2000 15:2154-2159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Spiegel S, Merrill AH Jr. Sphingolipid metabolism and cell growth regulation. FASEB J 1996 10:1388-1397[Abstract]
  10. Perry DK. Ceramide and apoptosis. Biochem Soc Trans 1999 27:399-404[Medline]
  11. Cuvillier O, Pirianov G, Kleuser B, Vanek PG, Coso OA, Gutkind S, Spiegel S. Suppression of ceramide-mediated programmed cell death by sphingosine-1-phosphate. Nature 1996 381:800-803[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Spiegel S, Kolesnick R. Sphingosine 1-phosphate as a therapeutic agent. Leukemia 2002 16:1596-1602[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Morita Y, Perez GI, Paris F, Miranda SR, Ehleiter D, Haimovitz-Friedman A, Fuks Z, Xie Z, Reed JC, Schuchman EH, Kolesnick RN, Tilly JL. Oocyte apoptosis is suppressed by disruption of the acid sphingomyelinase gene or by sphingosine-1-phosphate therapy. Nat Med 2000 6:1109-1114[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Paris F, Perez GI, Fuks Z, Haimovitz-Friedman A, Nguyen H, Bose M, Ilagan A, Hunt PA, Morgan WF, Tilly JL, Kolesnick R. Sphingosine 1-phosphate preserves fertility in irradiated female mice without propagating genomic damage in offspring. Nat Med 2002 8:901-902[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Henriksen K, Kulmala J, Toppari J, Mehrotra K, Parvinen M. Stage-specific apoptosis in the rat seminiferous epithelium: quantification of irradiation effects. J Androl 1996 17:394-402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Parvinen M, Vanha-Perttula T. Identification and enzyme quantitation of the stages of the seminiferous epithelial wave in the rat. Anat Rec 1972 174:435-449[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Parvinen M, Hecht NB. Identification of living spermatogenic cells of the mouse by transillumination-phase contrast microscopic technique for ‘in situ’ analyses of DNA polymerase activities. Histochemistry 1981 71:567-579[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Toppari J, Bishop PC, Parker JW, diZerega GS. DNA flow cytometric analysis of mouse seminiferous epithelium. Cytometry 1988 9:456-462[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Erkkilä K, Henriksen K, Hirvonen V, Rannikko S, Salo J, Parvinen M, Dunkel L. Testosterone regulates apoptosis in adult human seminiferous tubules in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997 82:2314-2321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Pentikäinen V, Erkkilä K, Suomalainen L, Parvinen M, Dunkel L. Estradiol acts as a germ cell survival factor in the human testis in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 85:2057-2067[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Erkkilä K, Aito H, Aalto K, Pentikäinen V, Dunkel L. Lactate inhibits germ cell apoptosis in the human testis. Mol Hum Reprod 2002 8:109-117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kangasniemi M, Veromaa T, Kulmala J, Kaipia A, Parvinen M, Toppari J. DNA-flow cytometry of defined stages of rat seminiferous epithelium: effects of 3 Gy of high-energy X-irradiation. J Androl 1990 11:312-317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hasegawa M, Wilson G, Russell LD, Meistrich ML. Radiation-induced cell death in the mouse testis: relationship to apoptosis. Radiat Res 1997 147:457-467[Medline]
  24. Haines GA, Hendry JH, Daniel CP, Morris ID. Germ cell and dose-dependent DNA damage measured by the comet assay in murine spermatozoa after testicular X-irradiation. Biol Reprod 2002 67:854-861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. van Beek ME, Davids JA, van de Kant HJ, de Rooij DG. Response to fission neutron irradiation of spermatogonial stem cells in different stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. Radiat Res 1984 97:556-569[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. van der Meer Y, Huiskamp R, Davids JA, van der Tweel I, de Rooij DG. The sensitivity to X rays of mouse spermatogonia that are committed to differentiate and of differentiating spermatogonia. Radiat Res 1992 130:296-302[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Grataroli R, Boussouar F, Benahmed M. Role of sphingosine in the tumor necrosis factor alpha stimulatory effect on lactate dehydrogenase A expression and activity in porcine Sertoli cells. Biol Reprod 2000 63:1473-1481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Meroni SB, Pellizzari EH, Canepa DF, Cigorraga SB. Possible involvement of ceramide in the regulation of rat Leydig cell function. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2000 75:307-313[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Lu ZH, Mu YM, Wang BA, Li XL, Lu JM, Li JY, Pan CY, Yanase T, Nawata H. Saturated free fatty acids, palmitic acid and stearic acid, induce apoptosis by stimulation of ceramide generation in rat testicular Leydig cell. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003 303:1002-1007[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. de Kretser DM, Loveland KL, Meinhardt A, Simorangkir D, Wreford N. Spermatogenesis. Hum Reprod 1998 13:1-8[Free Full Text]
  31. Grootegoed JA, Siep M, Baarends WM. Molecular and cellular mechanisms in spermatogenesis. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 14:331-343[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Hecht NB. Molecular mechanisms of male germ cell differentiation. Bioessays 1998 20:555-561[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Sassone-Corsi P. Transcriptional checkpoints determining the fate of male germ cells. Cell 1997 88:163-166[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Verhoeven G. Local control systems within the testis. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992 6:313-333[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Butler A, He X, Gordon RE, Wu HS, Gatt S, Schuchman EH. Reproductive pathology and sperm physiology in acid sphingomyelinase-deficient mice. Am J Pathol 2002 161:1061-1075[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Suomalainen L, Hakala JK, Pentikäinen V, Otala M, Erkkilä K, Pentikäinen MO, Dunkel L. Sphingosine-1-phosphate in inhibition of male germ cell apoptosis in the human testis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88:5572–5579.
  37. Tesarik J, Martinez F, Rienzi L, Iacobelli M, Ubaldi F, Mendoza C, Greco E. In vitro effects of FSH and testosterone withdrawal on caspase activation and DNA fragmentation in different cell types of human seminiferous epithelium. Hum Reprod 2002 17:1811-1819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Kluk MJ, Hla T. Signaling of sphingosine-1-phosphate via the S1P/EDG-family of G-protein-coupled receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002 1582:72-80[Medline]
  39. Yan W, Rajkovic A, Viveiros MM, Burns KH, Eppig JJ, Matzuk MM. Identification of Gasz, an evolutionarily conserved gene expressed exclusively in germ cells and encoding a protein with four ankyrin repeats, a sterile-alpha motif, and a basic leucine zipper. Mol Endocrinol 2002 16:1168-1184[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
X. Ye
Lysophospholipid signaling in the function and pathology of the reproductive system
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2008; 14(5): 519 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Bonnaud, C. Niaudet, G. Pottier, M.-H. Gaugler, J. Millour, J. Barbet, L. Sabatier, and F. Paris
Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Protects Proliferating Endothelial Cells from Ceramide-Induced Apoptosis but not from DNA Damage-Induced Mitotic Death
Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 67(4): 1803 - 1811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
L. Suomalainen, V. Pentikainen, and L. Dunkel
Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Inhibits Nuclear Factor {kappa}B Activation and Germ Cell Apoptosis in the Human Testis Independently of Its Receptors
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2005; 166(3): 773 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
K. Matsumoto, Y. Banno, T. Murate, Y. Akao, and Y. Nozawa
Localization of Sphingosine Kinase-1 in Mouse Sperm Acrosomes
J. Histochem. Cytochem., February 1, 2005; 53(2): 243 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Otala, M. O. Pentikainen, T. Matikainen, L. Suomalainen, J. K. Hakala, G. I. Perez, M. Tenhunen, K. Erkkila, P. Kovanen, M. Parvinen, et al.
Effects of Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency on Male Germ Cell Development and Programmed Cell Death
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2005; 72(1): 86 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/3/759    most recent
biolreprod.103.021840v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Otala, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dunkel, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Otala, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dunkel, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Otala, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dunkel, L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS