Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print December 10, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.024844
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/4/1063    most recent
biolreprod.103.024844v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Beg, M.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Beg, M.A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Beg, M.A.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 70, 1063–1069 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.024844
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Ovary

Dose-Response Study of Intrafollicular Injection of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I on Follicular Fluid Factors and Follicle Dominance in Mares1

O.J. Ginther2, E.L. Gastal, M.O. Gastal, C.M. Checura, and M.A. Beg

Eutheria Foundation, Cross Plains, Wisconsin 53528


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The effect of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on the concentrations of follicular fluid factors during follicle deviation and the development of dominance was studied in mares in two experiments. Transvaginal ultrasound guidance was used for intrafollicular injection and subsequent sequential sampling of follicular fluid. Treatment involved a single injection of IGF-I into the second-largest follicle (F2) at the expected beginning of deviation (Hour 0) based on diameter (>=20 mm) of the largest follicle (F1). Mares in IGF-I groups were given a dose of 500 µg (experiment 1) or 250, 25, or 2.5 µg (experiment 2). Ablation of F1 at Hour 24 was done in experiment 1, but not in experiment 2. The 500- and 250-µg doses stimulated growth, leading to ovulation of F2 in 10 of 10 and 4 of 5 mares in the two experiments, respectively, compared to 4 of 12 and 0 of 5 in saline-injected controls. These doses prevented (P < 0.05) the increase in IGF binding protein-2 and androstenedione that occurred in F2 of controls and increased (P < 0.05) the concentrations of activin-A, inhibin-A, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The 500-µg dose stimulated higher (P < 0.05) concentrations of estradiol, but not until Hour 48, whereas the lower doses were ineffective. In experiment 2, free IGF-I concentrations in F2 at Hour 24 decreased progressively as the dose decreased so that concentrations for the 2.5-µg dose were higher (P < 0.05) than in F2 of controls and similar (not significantly different) to endogenous concentrations in F1. Correspondingly, concentrations of androstenedione in F2 at Hour 24 were lower (P < 0.05) and concentrations of activin-A, inhibin-A, and VEGF were higher (P < 0.05) after treatment of F2 with the 2.5-µg dose than in F2 of controls and were similar to concentrations in F1. Hence, a physiologic intrafollicular dose of IGF-I did not stimulate estradiol production but reduced the production of androstenedione and stimulated the production of activin-A, inhibin-A, and VEGF during follicle selection in mares.

cytokines, estradiol, follicular development, growth factors, ovary


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Follicle deviation in monovular species is characterized by a change in growth rates between the future dominant and subordinate follicles at the end of a common growth phase during a major follicular wave (for reviews, see [1, 2]). In mares, the end of the common growth phase and the beginning of deviation in diameters occur when the future dominant follicle has a mean diameter of 22.5 mm. Differences between the two largest follicles in the concentrations of follicular fluid factors (steroids, growth factors, cytokines) are associated with diameter deviation and, apparently, underlie a greater responsiveness to gonadotropins for the developing dominant follicle than for the other follicles. In mares, follicular fluid concentrations of free insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) became differentially higher in the future dominant follicle before the beginning of diameter deviation, and concentrations of IGF binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) began to increase in the subordinate follicles at the beginning of deviation [3]. On a temporal basis, these results indicate that the IGF system plays a role in the differential growth rates of the two largest follicles during deviation in mares.

Recently, the in vivo effects of IGF-I on follicular fluid factors were studied in heifers and mares [4]. The second-largest follicle (F2) was injected with recombinant human (rh) IGF-I at the expected beginning of deviation, and follicular fluid samples were taken at various hours during the 24-h posttreatment period. In heifers, IGF-I treatment of F2 increased the follicular fluid concentrations of estradiol and androstenedione after 3 h. In mares, IGF-I treatment of F2 resulted in a decrease in androstenedione and an increase in activin-A and inhibin-A at 24 h. These effects of IGF-I on follicular fluid factors were consistent with reported temporal relationships of follicular fluid factors between the largest follicle (F1) and F2 during deviation [3], but no indication was found that IGF-I stimulated estradiol production in mares during the 24 h after treatment. In a study of the experimental assumption of dominance by F2 after ablation of F1, free IGF-I began to increase in the future dominant follicle (i.e., F2) 12 h before the beginning of experimental deviation, whereas estradiol did not begin to increase in F2 until 36 h after the beginning of the free IGF-I increase [5]. Therefore, in the experiment on the effects of IGF-I injection [4], the last sampling at 24 h may have been too early after IGF-I treatment to detect an estradiol increase.

In mares, diameter deviation is indicated morphologically not only by the differential growth rate between the developing dominant and subordinate follicles but also by an expanded nonechoic ultrasonic layer within the wall of the dominant follicle. The echotextural changes distinguished the future dominant follicle from the future largest subordinate follicle approximately 1 day earlier than the beginning of diameter deviation [6]. The echogenic changes were attributed to increased vascularization. In other species, the increased vascularization of the theca interna is associated with angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; for reviews, see [7, 8]). Recent studies have suggested that IGF-I may be involved in VEGF-mediated vascularization of the follicle; in cattle [9] and monkeys [8], IGFs stimulate the secretion of VEGF from cultured granulosa cells. It has been suggested that angiogenic factors may play a role in follicle selection [1012]. However, to our knowledge, the position of angiogenic factors, such as VEGF, in the cascade of events leading to follicle deviation has not been studied in any species.

In the present study, a single injection of rhIGF-I was made into F2 to determine, first, if a pharmacologic dose increases the follicular fluid concentrations of estradiol within 48 h and affects the circulating concentrations of FSH and, second, if a physiologic dose that simulates the IGF-I concentrations in the companion F1 will alter the concentrations of follicular fluid factors, including VEGF, in F2.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Ultrasonography

Animals were handled in accordance with the Guide for Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research. Seventy-three mares were used in two experiments during the ovulatory season (May–September, Northern Hemisphere). The mares were mixed breeds of ponies, were 10 to 17 yr of age, and weighed 300 to 450 kg. The feeding program and the equipment and techniques for transrectal and transvaginal ultrasound scanning and manipulation of ovaries have been described previously [13, 14]. A new follicular wave was induced by ablation of all 6-mm follicles 10 days postovulation, also as described previously [13]. Ultrasound scanning of follicles was done every 24 h postablation in both experiments, except that mares in experiment 1 were also scanned 12 h after treatment. A two-follicle model was prepared in the postablation follicular wave as described previously [13] so that continuous follicle identity was not complicated by many follicles. All follicles of the postablation wave, except the two largest, were ablated when the largest follicle reached 15 mm. The two retained follicles were designated as F1 and F2 when F1 reached 20 mm (the expected beginning of deviation; Hour 0). Transvaginal ultrasound targeting was used as described previously for treatment of a designated follicle in mares [14, 15] and for sampling of follicular fluid [16]. Sequential sampling of follicles was done in each mare at designated hours. Diameters of F1 and F2 were recorded before follicle treatment or sampling and every 24 h until Hour 96. Thereafter, only the fate (ovulation or regression) of the two follicles was determined.

Experiment 1

Mares were randomized into a saline group (injection of physiologic saline) and an IGF-I group (n = 12/group). At Hour 0 (F1 >= 20 mm), F2 was injected with either 50 µl of physiologic saline or 50 µl of rhIGF-I (10 µg/µl; total dose, 500 µg; Genetech, Inc., San Francisco, CA). A sample of follicular fluid (200 µl) was taken from F2 sequentially from each mare at Hours 12, 24, and 48. End points for F2 were follicular fluid concentrations of free IGF-I, IGFBP-2, estradiol, progesterone, androstenedione, activin-A, inhibin-A, and VEGF; follicle diameter; and the occurrence of ovulation. At Hour 24, F1 was ablated to determine if follicle growth and the rate of ovulation for F2 or experimental assumption of dominance by F2 would be different between groups. Blood samples (20 ml) for assay of FSH were taken at Hours 0, 12, 24, 48, and 72 from the jugular vein.

Experiment 2

Mares were randomized into a control group (no puncture of F2 until sampling), a saline group, and three IGF-I groups (n = 7–12/group). At Hour 0, F2 of the saline group was given 25 µl of physiologic saline containing 0.1% BSA (RIA grade; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). In the mares of the three IGF-I groups, F2 was given a single 25-µl injection containing rhIGF-I doses of 250 µg (high), 25 µg (medium), or 2.5 µg (low). To prepare the IGF-I doses, dilution was done with saline containing 0.1% BSA. A sample of follicular fluid (200 µl) was taken from F1 and from F2 sequentially at Hours 24 and 48. Sampling of F1 was done to determine if the induced concentrations of follicular fluid factors in the IGF-I-treated F2 were similar to those in the nontreated F1 and whether treatment of F2 affected the follicular fluid factors of F1. The end points for F1 and F2 were the same as for F2 in experiment 1.

The effects of follicle treatment and sampling and the resulting extent of fluid loss (diameter decrease) on the future ability of the follicle to develop and ovulate were examined. This was done by comparing the extent of the diameter decrease during the 24 h after a sampling of F1 with the ovulation rate of the groups in which the nontreated F1 was expected to have a high ovulation rate (control and saline groups). The greatest 24-h decrease in diameter after sampling F1 at either Hour 24 or Hour 48 was used as the value for each mare. The intention was to develop a definition of excessive fluid loss for replacement of mares.

Hormone Assays

Blood and follicular fluid samples were centrifuged (500 x g for 10 min), decanted, and stored (-20°C) until assay. Plasma samples were assayed for FSH by radioimmunoassay as validated previously [17] and modified [3] in our laboratory. The intraassay coefficient of variation (CV) was 10.6%, and the sensitivity was 0.6 ng/ml. Follicular fluid samples were assayed for free IGF-I, IGFBP-2, estradiol, progesterone, androstenedione, activin-A, and inhibin-A using commercially available kits that have been modified and validated for use with equine follicular fluid in our laboratory [3]. Intra- and interassay CVs for these hormones and experiments were less than 9.9%. The sensitivities for the two experiments, respectively, were as follows: free IGF-I, 0.03 and 0.01 ng/ml; IGFBP-2, 0.8 and 0.3 ng/ml; estradiol, 0.2 and 0.3 pg/ml; progesterone, 0.02 and 0.08 ng/ml; androstenedione, 0.01 and 0.03 ng/ml; activin-A, 0.02 and 0.1 ng/ml; and inhibin-A, 1.6 and 3.8 pg/ml.

Concentrations of VEGF in the follicular fluid were determined using a competitive ELISA kit (product no. 412710; Neogen Corporation, Lexington, KY). The kit was developed for use with human serum, plasma, and other biological fluids and was adapted and validated for use with equine follicular fluid in our laboratory. The supplied standards (50.00–0.78 ng/ml) were reconstituted with assay diluent number 2, which also served as the zero standard. The color intensity of the enzyme substrate was inversely proportional to the concentration. Serial dilutions (1.56–100 µl) of a pool of equine follicular fluid in a total volume of 100 µl of assay diluent number 2 resulted in a displacement curve that was similar to the standard curve. A working dilution of 1:5 was used for the follicular fluid samples, because 20 µl resulted in an optical density that was central to the range of the standard curve. According to the manufacturer, the cross-reactivity of the assay with other cytokines and World Health Organization cytokine standards is less than 0.5%. The intra- and interassay CVs, respectively, for quality-control samples were 1.6% and 5.3% for experiment 1 and 10.2% and 5.3% for experiment 2. The sensitivity was 0.6 and 0.7 ng/ml for experiments 1 and 2, respectively, as determined by 2 SD below the mean optical density of the zero standard.

Statistical Analyses

The follicular and hormonal data were challenged for extreme values with the Dixon outlier test [18] and for normality with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The concentrations of FSH were converted to the percentage change from Hour 0 because of a wide disparity among mares in FSH concentrations throughout the experimental period. When the normality test was significant (P < 0.05), data were transformed by either natural logarithm or square root. End points were analyzed to determine the effects of group, hour, and interaction using a mixed linear model with a repeated statement to account for the autocorrelation between sequential measurements (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). If a significant (P < 0.05) effect of group or a group-by-hour interaction was detected, unpaired t-tests were used to locate the mean differences between groups within an hour, and paired t-tests were used between hours within a group. The difference in frequency of ovulation among groups was analyzed by a chi-square test. A probability of P = 0.05 indicated that a difference was significant, and probabilities of between P > 0.05 and P = 0.1 indicated that a difference approached significance.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Experiment 1

Two mares were removed from the IGF-I group because of failure to obtain a follicular fluid sample, resulting in 12 and 10 mares in the saline and IGF-I groups, respectively. The ovulation rate for F2 was greater (P < 0.001) in the IGF-I group (10 of 10) than in the saline group (4 of 12). The group-by-hour interaction for diameter of F2 during Hours -96 to 96 was significant, reflecting primarily greater diameters at Hours 24–96 in the IGF-I group (Fig. 1). The interaction of percentage change from Hour 0 in FSH concentrations was significant, reflecting a greater percentage increase in the saline group at Hours 48 and 72 (Fig. 1).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Experiment 1: mean (± SEM) diameters of the second-largest follicle (F2; left) and percentage change in circulating FSH concentrations (right) in mares following a single injection of 500 µg of rhIGF-I (IGF-I group; n = 10) or saline (n = 12) into F2. The injection was made at the expected beginning of deviation (F1 >= 20 mm; Hour 0), and F1 was ablated at Hour 24. Follicular fluid was sampled (200 µl) sequentially at Hours 12, 24, and 48. An asterisk indicates a significant difference (P < 0.05) and a number sign a difference approaching significance (P < 0.1) between groups within an hour. Means with different letters within an end point and group are significantly different (P < 0.05). GH, Group-by-hour interaction

Differences in concentrations of follicular fluid factors between the saline and IGF-I groups over Hours 12, 24, and 48 (main effect of group) were significant for all factors (Fig. 2). The group-by-hour interaction was significant for free IGF-I, IGFBP-2, estradiol, androstenedione, activin-A, and inhibin-A; only the two main effects were significant or approached significance for progesterone and VEGF. The interactions reflected primarily greater concentrations of free IGF-I and inhibin-A and lower concentrations of androstenedione at Hours 24 and 48 in the IGF-I group and progressively increasing concentrations of IGFBP-2 in the saline group and activin-A in the IGF-I group. In the IGF-I group, estradiol increased, but only between Hours 24 and 48, and progesterone was greater at all hours. Concentrations of VEGF decreased in the saline group over Hours 12–48 and were higher in the IGF-I group at Hours 24 and 48.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Experiment 1: mean (± SEM) concentrations of follicular fluid factors in the second-largest follicle (F2) following a single injection of 500 µg of rhIGF-I (IGF-I group) or saline into F2. The injection was made at the expected beginning of deviation (F1 >= 20 mm; Hour 0), and F1 was ablated at Hour 24. Follicular fluid (200 µl) was sampled sequentially at Hours 12, 24, and 48. The significant interactions of group (G) by hour (H) are shown regardless of whether the main effects were significant. When the interaction was not significant, the main effects are shown. Means with different letters indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05) between hours within groups. An asterisk indicates a significant difference (P < 0.05) and a number sign a difference approaching significance (P < 0.1) between groups within an hour

Experiment 2

In the control and saline groups, ovulation from F1 occurred in 17 of 22 mares. The mean maximum decrease in F1 diameter per mare during the 24 h after a follicular fluid sampling was less (P < 0.0001) in the F1-ovulatory mares (-0.4 ± 0.8 mm, mean ± SEM) than in the F1-nonovulatory mares (-7.8 ± 0.8 mm, mean ± SEM). The 24-h diameter decrease was greater in every F1-nonovulatory mare than in any F1-ovulatory mare, with one exception in an F1-ovulatory mare. For this reason, a diameter decrease in F1 or F2 during the 24 h after an injection or sampling that exceeded the minimal decrease (5.7 mm) in the F1-nonovulatory mares was defined as an indicator of excessive fluid loss. Mares in all groups with excessive fluid loss were replaced and not used in the statistical analyses. Totaled over all groups, a diameter decrease of more than 5.7 mm occurred in more mares when the sampled follicles (F1 and F2) were in the same ovary (13 of 24 mares; 54%) than when the two follicles were in opposite ovaries (7 of 25; 28%); the difference between groups approached significance (P < 0.06). After replacement of mares because of excessive fluid loss, injection or sampling problems, and persistent corpus luteum, the number of mares in the groups was as follows: control, six; saline, five; high-dose IGF-I, five; medium-dose IGF-I, five; and low-dose IGF-I, six.

The ovulation rate from F2 was different (P < 0.03) among groups (control, zero of six; saline, zero of five; high-dose IGF-I, four of five; medium-dose IGF-I, zero of five; low-dose IGF-I, zero of six). In the control, saline, medium-dose IGF-I, and low-dose IGF-I groups, all mares ovulated from F1. In the high-dose IGF-I group, one mare had a small F2 (15.4 mm) at the time of treatment and ovulated from only F1, two ovulated from both F1 and F2, and two ovulated from only F2. The diameter of F2 showed a group-by-hour interaction (P < 0.002) over Hours -96 to 96, but F1 did not (Fig. 3). The F2 diameter at Hour 24 was smaller in the saline group than in the control (P < 0.02) or high-dose IGF-I (P < 0.03) groups. At Hour 48, the diameter of F2 was greater (P < 0.05) in the high-dose IGF-I group than in the other groups.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Experiment 2: mean (± SEM) diameters of the two largest follicles (F1 and F2) following a single injection of saline or rhIGF-I into F2 at the expected beginning of deviation (F1 >= 20 mm; Hour 0). The groups were as follows: no treatment (control), n = 6; saline, n = 5; and IGF-I doses of 250 µg (high, n = 5), 25 µg (medium, n = 5), and 2.5 µg (low, n = 6). Follicular fluid (200 µl) was sampled sequentially at Hours 24 and 48 from F1 and F2. Results of the factorial analyses are shown. For F2, diameter of the saline group was smaller (P < 0.05) than for the no-treatment and high-dose IGF-I groups at Hour 24. Diameter of F2 for the high-dose IGF-I group was greater (P < 0.05) than for the other groups at Hour 96. GH, Group-by-hour interaction; H, hour

For each follicular fluid factor, the concentrations in F1 did not differ among the five groups, and the group-by-hour interaction was not significant. The F1 data for the five groups were combined to examine the differences for F1 between Hours 24 and 48 and as an F1 control for the F2 groups. Similarly, no differences were observed between the F2 control and saline groups for any F2 follicular fluid factor, and F2 data for the two groups were combined to serve as F2 controls. Thus, comparisons were made among F1-control, F2-control, and the high-, medium-, and low-dose IGF-I groups as shown (Fig. 4). The group-by-hour interaction was significant (P < 0.03) for free IGF-I, IGFBP-2, estradiol, androstenedione, and VEGF. The main effects of group and hour were significant (P < 0.03) for progesterone, activin-A, and inhibin-A. Within the IGF-I groups, concentrations of free IGF-I decreased (P < 0.0004) as the dose decreased within both hours. For Hour 48, concentrations of inhibin-A decreased (P < 0.03) as the IGF-I dose decreased, whereas androstenedione and IGFBP-2 increased (P < 0.009) as the IGF-I dose decreased. At Hour 24, concentrations of androstenedione, activin-A, inhibin-A, and VEGF in F2 of the low-dose IGF-I group were not significantly different from the concentrations in the F1 controls. At Hour 24, free IGF-I concentration in F2 for the high- and medium-dose IGF-I groups was higher (P < 0.05) than in the F1 controls. Androstenedione concentration was lower (P < 0.05) in F2 of the high- and medium-dose IGF-I groups than in the F1 controls. Differences (P < 0.05) between hours for each group and groups that differed (P < 0.05) from the F2 controls within each hour are shown (Fig. 4).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Experiment 2: mean (± SEM) concentrations of follicular fluid factors of the two largest follicles (F1 and F2) following a single treatment into F2 at the expected beginning of deviation (F1 >= 20 mm; Hour 0). The F1 controls are combined for all groups (no significant difference among groups), and the F2 controls are combined for nontreated and saline-treated mares (no significant difference between groups). The doses of rhIGF-I were 250 µg (high), 25 µg (medium), and 2.5 µg (low). The group-by-hour interaction or the main effect of group was significant (P < 0.03) for each end point. The letters a and b indicate concentrations within an end point and hour that are different (P < 0.05) between F2 of the controls (b) and the other groups (a). The letters y and z indicate means within an end point that are different (P < 0.05) between hours


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The intrafollicular injection and sampling procedures did not interfere with ovulation, as indicated by ovulation of all the treated F2 follicles in experiment 1. A transient decrease in diameter after intrafollicular treatment or sampling has been reported and discussed previously [4, 16]. Excessive loss of fluid in experiment 2 was defined as a diameter decrease of more than 5.7 mm in either follicle during any 24-h period after follicle puncture. Replacement of mares by defining excessive fluid loss before follicular fluid samples were assayed objectively minimized the potential confounding impact of sampling two follicles. The fluid loss likely resulted from additional handling of ovaries from sampling two follicles rather than one follicle (as in experiment 1). The tendency for the more frequent occurrence of excessive fluid loss when the two follicles were in the same ovary is consistent with this interpretation.

A comparison of follicular fluid factors between F1 and F2 at Hours 24 and 48 for follicles that were not injected with IGF-I (controls) was available in experiment 2. Higher concentrations of free IGF-I, estradiol, progesterone, activin-A, and inhibin-A and lower concentrations of IGFBP-2 and androstenedione were found in F1 compared with F2 at both hours. All these results are consistent with those of a previous study regarding temporal relationships among follicular fluid factors in mares [3].

The highest doses for a single injection of rhIGF-I (500 and 250 µg) in the two experiments were pharmacologic; the 250-µg dose resulted in free IGF-I concentrations in F2 at Hour 24 that were 14-fold higher than those in the nontreated F1 at Hour 24 (89.3 vs. 6.2 ng/ml). The basis for using a pharmacologic dose in these initial studies has been discussed previously [4]. In experiment 2, the free IGF-I concentrations in F2 at Hour 24 decreased progressively as the IGF-I dose decreased so that the concentrations for the low dose (2.5 µg) were higher than those in F2 of the controls but similar to the endogenous concentrations in F1. Thus, the 2.5-µg dose resulted in a concentration of free IGF-I in F2 that can be considered physiologic for F1 at that hour. Concentrations also decreased at Hour 48 as the dose decreased so that the concentrations for the low dose at Hour 48 were equivalent to those in F2 of the controls.

Increased growth and ovulation rate (100%) for F2 after treatment with 500 µg of rhIGF-I at the expected beginning of deviation in experiment 1 confirmed the results of a previous study [4]. In experiment 2, ovulation occurred from F2 in most mares (80%) in the high-dose (250 µg) IGF-I group compared to none in the control group (no follicle puncture), saline-treated, and medium-dose (25 µg) and low-dose (2.5 µg) IGF-I groups. The stimulation of F2 growth and ovulation by single pharmacologic doses of rhIGF-I (250 and 500 µg), but not by a single physiologic dose (2.5 µg), is attributable to the prolonged versus transient stimulatory effects. In experiment 2, follicular fluid sampling was done at Hours 24 and 48 from F1 as well as from F2, and ovulation in the high-dose IGF-I group occurred from both follicles in 40% of mares. The single mare in the high-dose IGF-I group that did not ovulate from F2 had the smallest diameter (15.4 mm) of F2 at the time of treatment, compared to diameters of more than 18.5 mm for the mares that ovulated from F2. Apparently, a follicle must be at a certain stage of development or diameter before it will respond to IGF-I treatment, but this hypothesis requires specific study.

The effect of the experimental procedures on circulating concentrations of FSH was examined in experiment 1. Ablation of F1 at Hour 24 in the saline group resulted in an immediate increase in FSH, similar to a reported increase following ablation of F1 at Hour 0 [5]. Treatment of F2 with rhIGF-I at Hour 0 prevented the FSH increase following ablation of F1. Thus, the IGF-I stimulation of F2 was demonstrated by the depression in systemic FSH, similar to what occurs when F1 is intact [5]. The decrease in FSH may have been in response to the increase in inhibin-A concentrations in F2 by Hour 24, as discussed below.

In experiment 1, concentrations of IGFBP-2 did not increase in the IGF-I group as they did in the saline group. In experiment 2, concentrations of IGFBP-2 in F2 at Hour 48 progressively increased as the dose of IGF-I decreased. In this regard, a reciprocal relationship between follicular fluid concentrations of free IGF-I and IGFBP-2 has been shown in mares during natural [3] and experimental [5] deviation.

Concentration of follicular fluid estradiol was not altered at Hour 12 or 24 in experiment 1, similar to the results of a previous study [4], but was higher at Hour 48. In experiment 2, the estradiol concentrations were not altered by exogenous IGF-I at Hours 24 or 48. The difference between experiments may be related to the higher rhIGF-I dose in experiment 1 (500 µg) compared with experiment 2 (250 µg) or to the continued high concentrations of free IGF-I in experiment 1 compared to the decrease between Hours 24 and 48 in experiment 2. The delay in an estradiol response to the 500-µg dose of IGF-I until Hour 48 in experiment 1 is consistent with the results of ablating F1 at the expected beginning of natural deviation, thereby causing F2 to convert to a dominant follicle [5]. In that study, estradiol did not begin to increase in F2 until 35 h after the beginning of the free IGF-I increase, and in the present study (experiment 1), the estradiol increase began between 24 and 48 h following the injection of 500 µg of IGF-I. Despite the reported increase of estradiol in plasma and follicular fluid before the beginning of natural diameter deviation [3, 16], our interpretation of the present results is that granulosa cell estradiol production is not immediately responsive to IGF-I and does not play a critical intrafollicular role in initiating the deviation mechanism in mares. In contrast, the results of temporality [19] and functional [4, 20] studies in heifers are consistent with an intrafollicular role of estradiol in the initiation of deviation, and estradiol secretion responds immediately to in vivo IGF-I treatment [4].

An increase in follicular fluid progesterone was the first detected change in an ovarian steroid hormone following treatment with 500 µg of rhIGF-I in a previous study [4] and in experiment 1. In experiment 2, an effect on progesterone was not detected. However, follicular fluid samples were not taken until Hour 24, and changes could have occurred earlier. The higher progesterone concentrations in F1 compared with nontreated F2 at Hours 24 and 48 could indicate that progesterone is a part of the deviation mechanism. However, in a temporality study [3], progesterone did not differentially increase in the developing dominant follicle until after increases occurred in other factors.

The higher concentrations of androstenedione in F2 of controls at Hours 24 and 48 was consistent for both experiments in the present study, a previous functional study [4], and a temporality study [3]. Various aspects of the increase in androstenedione in subordinate follicles in mares, as opposed to a decrease in heifers, have been discussed previously [4]. A close, reciprocal relationship was observed between free IGF-I and androstenedione concentrations in experiment 2. Higher concentrations of free IGF-I over the five groups were associated with correspondingly lower concentrations of androstenedione. Both free IGF-I and androstenedione concentrations in F2 in the low-dose IGF-I group were similar to the concentrations in the F1 controls, indicating that physiologic levels of free IGF-I in F1 account for the prevailing concentrations of androstenedione in F1. At Hour 48, the progressively increasing concentrations of androstenedione in F2 as the IGF-I dose decreased were accounted for by the progressively decreasing concentrations of free IGF-I.

Both activin-A and inhibin-A concentrations were higher in F2 of the IGF-I-treated follicles than in the controls, confirming the results of a previous study [4]. These results are also compatible with those of a temporality study [3] that demonstrated a differential increase in these factors in the future dominant follicle versus the future largest subordinate follicle at the time of a differential increase in free IGF-I. However, an increase in IGF-I occurred before an increase in activin-A and inhibin-A during experimental assumption of dominance by F2 [5]. In addition, in other species, IGF-I stimulated the production of both factors in vitro [21]. Results of the reported studies, together with those of the present study, have demonstrated both temporally and functionally (in vivo) that IGF-I stimulates increases in activin-A and inhibin-A in the developing dominant follicle of mares. At Hour 24 in the low-dose IGF-I group, concentrations of free IGF-I, activin-A, and inhibin-A were at greater concentrations than in the F2 controls, but concentrations of all three factors were similar to concentrations in the F1 controls. These results indicate that endogenous IGF-I in F1 regulates the production of activin-A and inhibin-A in F1.

The VEGF results are of special interest. This factor apparently has not been previously assayed in equine follicular fluid, although mRNA expression of VEGF in the equine corpus luteum has been reported [22]. The role of VEGF in follicle deviation or selection has not been studied specifically in any species, although follicular fluid concentrations have been shown to increase in cattle [10] and pigs [23] as the follicle diameter increases. In the F1 and F2 controls of experiment 2, VEGF was higher in the follicular fluid of F1 than in F2 at both Hour 24 and Hour 48. On a temporal basis, this finding suggests that VEGF could play a role in follicle deviation or selection, but further studies that include groups from before the beginning of deviation are required. The present finding that IGF-I stimulated the production of VEGF in mares in vivo in both experiments is consistent with the reports that VEGF secretion increases in cultures of granulosa cells of cattle [9] and monkeys [8] when exposed to IGF-I. The lowest IGF-I dose stimulated a VEGF increase in F2 at Hour 24 so that the concentrations of both VEGF and free IGF-I in F2 were similar to the concentrations in the F1 controls at this time.

In summary, a single injection of a pharmacologic dose (250 or 500 µg) of rhIGF-I into F2 at the expected beginning of follicle deviation (Hour 0) increased the production of activin-A, inhibin-A, and VEGF and stimulated growth of a dominant follicle, leading to ovulation. Estradiol and progesterone were less responsive to IGF-I than other follicular fluid factors. Injection of progressively lower doses of rhIGF-I into F2 resulted in increasingly higher concentrations of androstenedione. The concentrations of free IGF-I, androstenedione, activin-A, inhibin-A, and VEGF in F2 at Hour 24 after treatment of F2 with a physiologic dose (2.5 µg) of IGF-I were not significantly different from concentrations in F1, indicating that these factors are regulated in F1 by endogenous IGF-I. Our interpretation of the results is that IGF-I alters the concentrations of other follicular fluid factors during follicle selection in mares.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Genetech, Inc. (San Francisco, CA), for a gift of rhIGF-I, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company (Kalamazoo, MI) for a gift of Lutalyse, Susan Jensen for technical assistance, and D.R. Bergfelt for manuscript review.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by the Eutheria Foundation (Cross Plains, WI), Projects P1-OG-03 and P3-OG-03. E.L. Gastal and M.O. Gastal are on leave from the Departments of Veterinary and Animal Science, respectively, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil. Back

2 Correspondence: O.J. Ginther, Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, 1656 Linden Drive, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI 53706. FAX: 608 262 7420; ginther{at}svm.vetmed.wisc.edu Back

Received: 28 October 2003.

First decision: 21 November 2003.

Accepted: 25 November 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Bergfelt DR, Donadeu FX, Kot K. Follicle selection in monovular species. Biol Reprod 2001 65:638-647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Donadeu FX, Bergfelt DR. Mechanism of follicle deviation in monovular farm species. Anim Reprod Sci 2003 78:239-257[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Donadeu FX, Ginther OJ. Changes in concentrations of follicular fluid factors during follicle selection in mares. Biol Reprod 2002 66:1111-1118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ginther OJ, Bergfelt DR, Beg MA, Meira C, Kot K. In vivo effects of an intrafollicular injection of insulin-like growth factor-I on the mechanism of follicle deviation in heifers and mares. Biol Reprod 2004; 70:99–105.
  5. Ginther OJ, Meira C, Beg MA, Bergfelt DR. Follicle and endocrine dynamics during experimental follicle deviation in mares. Biol Reprod 2002 67:862-867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gastal EL, Donadeu FX, Gastal MO, Ginther OJ. Echotextural changes in the follicular wall during follicle deviation in mares. Theriogenology 1999 52:803-814[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Redmer DA, Reynolds LP. Angiogenesis in the ovary. Rev Reprod 1996 1:182-192[Abstract]
  8. Martinez-Chequer JC, Stouffer RL, Hazzard TM, Patton PE, Molskness TA. Insulin-like growth factors-1 and -2, but not hypoxia, synergize with gonadotropin hormone to promote vascular endothelial growth factor-A secretion by monkey granulosa cells from preovulatory follicles. Biol Reprod 2003 68:1112-1118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Schams D, Kosmann B, Berisha B, Amselgruber WM, Miyamoto A. Stimulatory and synergistic effects of luteinizing hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I on the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor and progesterone of cultured bovine granulosa cells. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2001 109:155-162[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Berisha B, Schams D, Kosmann M, Amselgruber W. Expression and localization of vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor during the final growth of bovine ovarian follicles. J Endocrinol 2000 167:371-382[Abstract]
  11. Zimmermann RC, Hartman T, Kavic S, Pauli SA, Bohlen P, Sauer MV, Kitajewski J. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-mediated angiogenesis is essential for gonadotropin-dependent follicle development. J Clin Invest 2003 112:659-669[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Zimmermann RC, Xiao E, Bohlen P, Ferin M. Administration of antivascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody in the early follicular phase delays follicular selection and development in the Rhesus monkey. Endocrinology 2002 143:2496-2502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Bergfelt DR, Ginther OJ. Role of diameter differences among follicles in selection of a future dominant follicle in mares. Biol Reprod 1997 57:1320-1327[Abstract]
  14. Ginther OJ. Ultrasonic Imaging and Animal Reproduction: Book 2, Horses. Cross Plains, WI: Equiservices Publishing; 1995:66–72
  15. Gastal EL, Kot K, Ginther OJ. Ultrasound-guided intrafollicular treatment in mares. Theriogenology 1995 44:1027-1037
  16. Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Wiltbank MC, Ginther OJ. Follicle deviation and intrafollicular and systemic estradiol concentrations in mares. Biol Reprod 1999 61:31-39[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Freedman LJ, Garcia MC, Ginther OJ. Influence of photoperiod and ovaries on seasonal reproductive activity in mares. Biol Reprod 1979 20:567-574[Abstract]
  18. Kanji GK. 100 Statistical Tests. London: Sage Publications; 1993:45, 171
  19. Beg MA, Bergfelt DR, Kot K, Wiltbank MC, Ginther OJ. Follicular fluid factors and granulosa cell gene expression associated with follicle deviation in cattle. Biol Reprod 2001 64:432-441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Beg MA, Meira C, Bergfelt DR, Ginther OJ. Role of estradiol in growth of follicles and follicle deviation in heifers. Reproduction 2003 125:847-854[Abstract]
  21. Glister C, Groome NP, Knight PG. Oocyte-mediated suppression of follicle-stimulating hormone- and insulin-like growth factor-induced secretion of steroids and inhibin-related proteins by bovine granulosa cells in vitro: possible role of transforming growth factor {alpha}. Biol Reprod 2003 68:758-765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Al-zi'abi MO, Watson ED, Fraser HM. Angiogenesis and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in the equine corpus luteum. Reproduction 2003 125:259-270[Abstract]
  23. Barboni B, Turriani M, Galeati G, Spinaci M, Bacci ML, Forni M, Mattioli M. Vascular endothelial growth factor production in growing pig antral follicles. Biol Reprod 2000 63:858-864[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L K Doyle, C O Hogg, E D Watson, and F X Donadeu
Seasonal effects on the response of ovarian follicles to IGF1 in mares
Reproduction, November 1, 2008; 136(5): 589 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M A Beg and O J Ginther
Follicle selection in cattle and horses: role of intrafollicular factors.
Reproduction, September 1, 2006; 132(3): 365 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
O J Ginther, E L Gastal, M O Gastal, and M A Beg
In vivo effects of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, activin-A and vascular endothelial growth factor on other follicular-fluid factors during follicle deviation in mares
Reproduction, April 1, 2005; 129(4): 489 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T.J. Acosta, E.L. Gastal, M.O. Gastal, M.A. Beg, and O.J. Ginther
Differential Blood Flow Changes Between the Future Dominant and Subordinate Follicles Precede Diameter Changes During Follicle Selection in Mares
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2004; 71(2): 502 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T.J. Acosta, M.A. Beg, and O.J. Ginther
Aberrant Blood Flow Area and Plasma Gonadotropin Concentrations During the Development of Dominant-Sized Transitional Anovulatory Follicles in Mares
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2004; 71(2): 637 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/4/1063    most recent
biolreprod.103.024844v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Beg, M.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Beg, M.A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Beg, M.A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS