|
|
||||||||
Neuroendocrinology |
Departamento de Biología,3 Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Ambientales, Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain
Endocrinologie Moléculaire de la Reproduction,4 UMR CNRS 6026, Campus de Beaulieu,35042 Rennes cedex, France
Instituto de Acuicultura Torre de la Sal,5 CSIC 12595, Ribera de Cabanes, Castellón, Spain
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
central nervous system, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor, neuroendocrinology, pituitary, seasonal reproduction
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In perciforms, three different GnRH forms are expressed, seabream GnRH (sbGnRH), salmon GnRH (sGnRH) and chicken II GnRH (cGnRH-II)[8]. It is clearly stated that the sbGnRH form represents the main hypophysiotrophic hormone [8, 9], whereas the roles of the two other GnRH forms expressed, sGnRH and cGnRH-II, remain still unknown. A critical step in the elucidation of the precise functions of different GnRH forms in the brain and pituitary is the study of their respective projections and targets. Recently, an immunohistochemical study performed in sea bass, using antibodies against the divergent GnRH-associated peptides of each GnRH precursor, unambiguously revealed the distinct pattern of projections of the three different GnRH systems expressed in this species [10].
The first step in GnRH action is the recognition of the hormone by specific membrane-associated receptors, which belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor family [1]. Since the first cloning of GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) in mouse [11, 12], cDNA encoding the GnRH-R has been characterized in a number of mammalian species [1317]. The analysis of the primary sequence reveals that GnRH-R is a single polypeptide containing seven hydrophobic transmembrane domains connected by hydrophilic extracellular and intracellular loops [1]. Recently, cDNAs for GnRH-R have been cloned and functionally characterized in different teleosts [1823]. Emerging data obtained in vertebrates and phylogenetic analyses have suggested the existence of different GnRH-R subtypes with distinct structural and/or pharmacological characteristics, different gene structures and/or tissue distributions [19, 2328].
The correlation of the pattern of projections of the different GnRH systems with the expression of GnRH receptors could greatly contribute to improving the knowledge of real hormone-receptor interactions and to clarifying the precise functions of multiple GnRH forms in the control of reproduction and other physiological processes. To obtain such information, we have cloned a full-length GnRH-R cDNA and analyzed, using in situ hybridization techniques, the qualitative and quantitative expression of this receptor in the brain and pituitary of the European sea bass along the reproductive cycle.
| MATERIAL AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax, specimens from the experimental fish laboratories of the Instituto de Acuicultura de Torre La Sal (CSIC, Castellón, Spain) were kept in running sea water with natural photoperiod and temperature conditions. Twenty-four females were killed along the reproductive cycle, in November 1999 (late vitellogenesis; n = 6), December 1999 (maturation; n = 6), February 2000 (spawning; n = 6), and May 2000 (postspawning/resting; n = 6). All animals were treated in agreement with the European Union regulation concerning the protection of experimental animals.
Cloning of a Full-Length cDNA for a Sea Bass GnRH-R
Total RNA was prepared from pituitaries of vitellogenic females (GSI > 5%) using the TRIzol reagent (Gibco-BRL, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as recommended by the manufacturer. Reverse transcription was performed with 5 µg of total RNA using 400 U of M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Gibco-BRL) in the presence of random hexanucleotide primers (200 ng) for 1 h at 37°C.
The full-length coding region was obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using degenerate primers designed from conserved sequences surrounding the start and the stop codon in other perciform fish, i.e., the striped bass (Morone saxatilis; [22]), the amberjack (Seriola dumerili; GenBank AJ130876), and the sea bream (Sparus aurata; N. Zmora, personal communication). Sequences of these primers were SB-for 5' TCAGAAAATGRACACCACTCT 3' and SB-rev 5' CTCATAKGWTGCTSTCAGAG 3.' PCR products of the expected size (about 1300 base pairs [bp]) were purified and cloned in the EcoRV site of the Bluescript plasmid for sequencing.
The cloning of the 3' and 5' extremities of the cDNA was then performed using the 5'/3' RACE kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Briefly, for the amplification of the 5' flanking region, 1.5 µg of total RNA were reverse transcribed using a specific primer (SB-5R1: 5' ATTGATAGCCAGAGGGTTGAG 3'). After the addition of a poly(A) tail at the 3' flanking region of the first-strand cDNA using a terminal transferase, a first amplification was performed using an internal specific primer (SB-5R2: 5' GGGTTGAGGATGGCTGACTGC 3') and an oligo-d(T)-anchor primer (Roche Diagnostics). A nested PCR was carried out using 1 µl of the first reaction as template with the primer SB-5R3 (5' CACGGTGACAAAGGCGCAAGA 3') and a second anchor primer (Roche Diagnostics). A single PCR product of about 700 bp was obtained and cloned in the pCDNA3.1-TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen) for sequencing. For the amplification of the 3' flanking region, reverse transcription was performed on 2 µg of total RNA using an oligo-d(T) primer. A first PCR was performed using a specific primer (SB-3R1: 5' TTTCCTGCCTGTTCCTGCTGC 3') and the oligo-d(T)-anchor primer (Roche Diagnostics). A second PCR was then realized using a nested specific primer (SB-3R2: 5' GAATAACATCCCCAGAGCCCG 3') and the second anchor primer (Roche Diagnostics). A single PCR product of about 800 bp was obtained and cloned in the same plasmid as above for sequencing. The cDNA sequence corresponding to the sea bass GnRH receptor has been submitted to the GenBank under the accession number AJ419594.
Sequence Analysis
Multiple alignments and phylogenetic analysis were carried out using ClustalW. This analysis was performed using the amino acid sequences of GnRH receptors available from GenBank. The sequence sources and GenBank accession numbers are as follows: Drosophila melanogaster (AF077299), japanese eel (AB041327), catfish (catfish-1, X97497; catfish- 2, AF329894), goldfish (goldfish A, AF121845; goldfish B, AF121846), rainbow trout (AJ272116), medaka (medaka1, AB057675; medaka2, AB057674), amberjack (AJ130876), Haplochromis burtoni (AY028476), striped bass (AF218841), rubber eel (AF174481), Xenopus (Xenopus I, AF172330; Xenopus II, AF257320), bullfrog (bullfrog-1, AF144063; bullfrog-2, AF15913; bullfrog-3, AF144062), chicken (AJ304414), mouse (L01119), rat (S59525), brushtail possum [29], sheep (L22215), bovine (U00934), horse (AF018072), dog (AF206513), pig (AH009128), marmoset monkey [30], bonnet monkey (AF156930), rhesus monkey (AF353987), and human (human I, L03380; human II, NM057163).
In Situ Hybridization
The preparation of [
-35S] dUTP-labeled single-stranded mRNA probes was carried out according to standard procedures. Sense and antisense sea bass GnRH-R riboprobes were synthesized using p-Bluescript- sbGnRH-R transcription vector as a template and then linearized with BamHI or EcoRI with T3 and T7 RNA polymerase, respectively. One microgram of the linearized plasmid was incubated for 1 h at 37°C in a solution containing a transcription buffer (Tris-HCl 40 mM, MgCl2 6 mM, Spermidine 2 mM), 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), rATP, rGTP, rCTP (0.25 mM each), 100 µCi of [
-35S] dUTP (MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA), RNase inhibitor, and 2.5 U of the appropriate RNA polymerase. The DNA template was then digested with RQ-1 DNase for 15 min at 37°C. Probes were purified on a Sephadex G50 column (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK) equilibrated with 50 µg of yeast tRNA using a loading buffer (Tris-HCl 10 mM, pH 7.5; EDTA 1 mM; DTT 10 mM; 0.1% SDS). The fractions containing the highest amount of radioactivity were pooled and the probes were precipitated overnight at 20°C and resuspended in the hybridization mix (50% formamide; 0.3 M NaCl; 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5; 5 mM EDTA; 10% dextran sulfate; 1x Denhardt solution; 10 mM DTT; 0.5 µg/µl yeast tRNA) at a concentration of 2 x 104 cpm/µl.
The protocol for in situ hybridization was according to González-Martínez et al. [31]. Brains were collected from animals anesthetized in phenoxyethanol (0.3 ml/L), previously perfused with 0.65% NaCl and fixative solution (4% paraformaldehyde; 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4; 5% picric acid). Transverse paraffin brain and pituitary sections (6 µm thick) were equilibrated at room temperature, rehydrated, and postfixed for 20 min. Sections were treated with protein kinase (20 µg/ml in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, and 5 mM EDTA) for 7.5 min and washed with PBS for 5 min, followed by a refixation in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min and a quick wash with distilled water. Thereafter, sections were acetylated for 10 min with 0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanolamine (pH 8), dehydrated through increasing concentrations of ethanol, and air dried. The sections were covered with the hybridization mix (20 x 103 cpm/slide), coverslipped, and incubated overnight at 52°C. Coverslips were then removed by immersion in a 5x SSC, 10 mM DTT solution at 55°C for 30 min, and then washed in a 2x SSC, 50% formamide, 10 mM DTT solution at 65°C for 30 min followed by several washes in NTE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, 5 mM EDTA) for 10 min at 37°C. To degrade single-stranded probe, the sections were incubated in a solution of NTE containing RNase A (20 µg/ml) for 30 min at 37°C. Sections were then rinsed in 2x SSC, 50% formamide, 10 mM DTT at 65°C, washed in 2x SSC and 0.1x SSC at room temperature, and dehydrated in ethanol. Slides were then dipped into an Ilford K5 photographic emulsion and exposed for 12 days at 4°C, developed, and counterstained with toluidine blue 0.02%. Adjacent sections were systematically treated with the sense and antisense probes.
In situ hybridization sections were analyzed on a Leica photomicroscope (Leica Microsystems AG, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with bright field and dark field, and computer images were obtained with a Sony DKC-CM30 Digital Camera (Sony, Tokyo, Japan). The software used was Adobe PhotoShop 5.5 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA) and no subsequent alterations were made. For the precise localization of GnRH-R-expressing cells, we have used a detailed sea bass brain atlas recently developed in our laboratory [32, 33].
For double in situ hybridization studies, nonisotopic riboprobes for sea bass luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ß subunits [34] were synthesized using a digoxigenin (DIG)-RNA labeling mix (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DIG-labeled riboprobes were dissolved in an appropriate volume of diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated H2O to obtain 200 ng probe/µl. After 5 min incubation at 80°C, both 35S-UTP and DIG riboprobes were simultaneously diluted 1:10 (final concentration of probes, 2 x 104 cpm/µl and 20 ng/µl, respectively) in hybridization buffer. Subsequently, 100 µl of hybridization solution containing either DIG-labeled LH-ß or FSH-ß riboprobes and 35S- UTP labeled sbGnRH-R riboprobe were added to each pretreated slide. The posthybridization procedure was as above, but before dehydration, slides were washed for 10 min at room temperature in buffer A (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl) and then incubated in blocking solution (2% blocking reagent [Roche Diagnostics] in buffer A) for 30 min at room temperature. Subsequently, the slides were incubated with anti-DIG Fab fragments from sheep conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Roche Diagnostics) diluted 1:1000 in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature. The slides were then rinsed twice in buffer B (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH = 9.5; 50 mM MgCl2; 100 mM NaCl). For signal detection, a NBT (4- nitroblue tetrazolium chloride)/BCIP (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate) ready-to-use tablet (Roche Diagnostics) was diluted in buffer B containing 1 mM levamisole (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and the slides were incubated in chromogenic solution for 1 h at room temperature. After color development, slides were dehydrated in ethanol solutions containing 0.3 M ammonium acetate, dipped in photographic emulsion (Amersham Biosciences), exposed under dry conditions at 4°C and developed after 12 days.
In addition, GnRH-R in situ hybridization was combined with GH immunohistochemistry using a streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method. In this case, pituitary sections were first processed for in situ hybridization using [
-35S] dUTP-labeled GnRH-R riboprobes, as reported above, and subsequently they were incubated overnight in a moist chamber at room temperature with a rabbit antiserum against recombinant seabream GH (kindly donated by Dr. Valdivia) diluted 1:1000 in Coons buffer (CBT; 0.01 M Veronal, 0.15 M NaCl) containing 0.10.2% Triton X-100 and 0.5% casein. Sections were washed in CBT (2 x 15 min) and incubated for 1.5 h at room temperature with Biotin-sp-Conjugated-AffiniPure Goat Anti-rabbit-IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA) diluted 1:1000 in CBT. After washing in CBT (2 x 15 min), sections were incubated 1.5 h at room temperature with peroxidase-conjugated- streptavidin complex (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc.) diluted 1:1000 in CBT. Finally, sections were washed in CBT followed by Tris- HCl (0.05 M, pH 7.4) and peroxidase activity was visualized in 0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, containing 0.025% 3,3 diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma) and 0.01% hydrogen peroxide. Controls were performed by preabsorption of primary antisera with their respective antigens, replacement of primary antisera with the corresponding preimmune sera, and omission of primary or biotinylated antisera.
Quantitative Analysis of GnRH-R Expression in Brainand Pituitary
For quantitative analysis of GnRH-R expression along the reproductive cycle, at least 60 brain and pituitary sections (10 sections/animal), hybridized with the antisense or sense probe, were randomly selected at each reproductive stage (late vitellogenesis, maturation, spawning, and postspawning/resting). Randomly selected bright field pictures (30 pictures/ animal) covering 1100 µm2 of surface in positive cell areas were obtained in the photomicroscope at high magnification with the help of a digital camera. To measure the percentage of the total pituitary area occupied by GnRH-R-expressing cells along the reproductive cycle, 60 antisense whole pituitary sections (10 sections/animal) were selected at random at each reproductive stage and randomly selected dark field pictures (30 pictures/ animal) covering 0.146 mm2 of surface were obtained at low magnification with the help of a digital camera. The area occupied by autoradiographic silver grains was measured with the help of the Scion Image Beta 4.0.2 software (NIH, Rockville, MD) and results were presented as mean ± SEM. The statistical analysis was performed with the help of the SPSS 10.0 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). As requirements of normality and homogeneity of variances were not satisfied, the Kruskall-Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance method was used followed by the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests. To compare the percentage of the total pituitary area occupied by GnRH-R-expressing cells along the reproductive cycle, a proportion test was used. Differences between mean values were considered significant at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using degenerate primers surrounding the start and the stop codons, we have cloned a cDNA containing the full- coding sequence of a sbGnRH-R. The sequence was then completed by obtaining the 5' and 3' untranslated region (UTR) using the rapid amplification of cDNA ends-PCR method. The complete cDNA was 1814 bp in length and encoded a predicted protein of 416 amino acids. The 5' UTR and 3' UTR were 239 bp and 324 bp in size, respectively. The complete nucleic acid sequence as well as the deduced amino acid sequence are shown in Figure 1. Hydrophobic analysis of the protein sequence showed an arrangement in seven transmembrane domains that is typical of a G protein-coupled receptor (Fig. 2). The structure of the molecule showed the presence of a C-terminal tail and restoration of Asp96, which is shared by the rest of GnRH- R present in perciforms. Moreover, the conserved Cys25 and Cys123 were present and four potential N-linked glycosylation sites were evident in the NH2-terminal region (Fig. 2). Sequence comparison was performed using ClustalW and a rooted phylogenetic tree was constructed by the addition of the Drosophila GnRH receptor-like sequence (Fig. 3). This analysis revealed a very high similarity with the GnRH-R cloned in other perciforms. Indeed, the sea bass GnRH-R shared about 96% and 90% of identity with striped bass GnRH-R and amberjack GnRH-R, respectively. The sbGnRH-R also showed 67% of identity with one of the receptors cloned in medaka and more than 55% of identity with an amphibian receptor cloned in the bullfrog, the bfGnRH-R-1. The identity with the GnRH-R of other vertebrates was about 40%.
|
|
|
Localization of GnRH-R mRNA in the Brain and Pituitary of the European Sea Bass
The cloned sequence was revealed as a specific and useful probe for the precise localization of expression of GnRH-R gene in the brain and pituitary of sea bass by in situ hybridization. The specificity of the signal was systematically checked on adjacent control sections incubated with the sense probe, which only showed uniform background. In sea bass, GnRH-R was only detected in the forebrain, pineal, and adenohypophysis (Fig. 4). In the telencephalon, most GnRH-R-expressing cells were found in the ventral telencephalon (Figs. 4 and 5, A, B, and F) and, particularly, in the central (Fig. 5B), ventral (Fig. 5B) and intermediate (Fig. 5F) nuclei. Furthermore, a conspicuous GnRH-R expression was observed in cells of the central nucleus of the dorsal telencephalon (Fig. 5, C and D). In the diencephalon, most GnRH-R-expressing cells appeared in the preoptic area (Figs. 4 and 5, EH), especially in the anteroventral (Fig. 5, E and F) and parvocellular (Fig. 5F) parts of the parvocellular preoptic nucleus. Further caudal, a weaker GnRH-R expression was evident in the anterior periventricular nucleus (Fig. 5G) and the gigantocellular part of the magnocellular preoptic nucleus (Fig. 5H).
|
|
In addition, a few GnRH-R-expressing cells were detected in the ventromedial thalamic nucleus (Figs. 4 and 5I). The most caudal GnRH-R-expressing cells appeared in the hypothalamus, particularly in the ventral part of the lateral tuberal nucleus (Figs. 4 and 5J) and in the nucleus of the lateral recess (Figs. 4 and 5K). A clear, specific radiolabeling was also evident in cells of the pineal gland (Figs. 4 and 5L). The highest expression of GnRH-R gene was observed in the pituitary (Fig. 6). Positive cells appeared as compact cell groups in the proximal pars distalis, but also in clusters and lining the external border of the pars intermedia (Fig. 6, AD). Double in situ hybridization revealed that virtually all LH cells expressed GnRH-R (Fig. 6E) but only a few FSH cells exhibited a remarkable GnRH-R expression (Fig. 6F). However, sea bass GH-immunoreactive cells were not positive for GnRH-R (Fig. 6G).
|
Quantitative Analysis of Brain and Pituitary GnRH-R Expression along the Reproductive Cycle
In the brain, the quantitative analysis of cell masses exhibiting specific radiolabeling revealed the existence of changes in the expression of GnRH-R along the reproductive cycle. Values obtained were expressed as mean area occupied by silver grains in µm2/1000 µm2 of brain section ± SEM, and appear represented in Figure 7. The highest GnRH-R expression was observed in the preoptic area, particularly in the anteroventral part of the parvocellular preoptic nucleus (NPOav). In this nucleus, the GnRH-R expression was low during late vitellogenesis and maturation periods and increased notably during the spawning season (78.25 ± 11.69; P < 0.001), decreasing significantly at the postspawning/resting period. In the remaining brain nuclei and in the pineal gland, significantly higher levels of GnRH-R were observed during the postspawning/resting season in relation to late vitellogenesis, maturation, and spawning stages (Fig. 7). This increase was especially evident in the pineal gland (56.03 ± 11.03; P < 0.001), ventromedial thalamic nucleus (VM; 52.43 ± 13.88; P < 0.001), and parvocellular part of the parvocellular preoptic nucleus (NPOpc; 46.38 ± 14.01; P < 0.001), but also in the anterior periventricular nucleus (NAPv; 38.66 ± 20.4; P < 0.001), the nucleus of the lateral recess (NRL; 38.38 ± 8.09; P < 0.001), the central nucleus of the dorsal telencephalon (Dc; 35.21 ± 20.2; P < 0.001), and the central (Vc; 33.54 ± 6.72; P < 0.001) and intermediate (Vi; 35.31 ± 10.58; P < 0.001) nuclei of the ventral telencephalon. The lowest increases in GnRH-R expression were observed in the ventral part of the lateral tuberal nucleus (NLTv; 29.28 ± 4.30; P < 0.001), the ventral nucleus of the ventral telencephalon (Vv; 22.98 ± 5.82; P < 0.001), and the magnocellular preoptic nucleus (PMgc; 18.86 ± 4.55; P < 0.001).
|
The pituitary of the sea bass exhibited an important expression of the GnRH-R gene at all stages of the reproductive cycle (Fig. 6, AD). However, this expression was significantly higher in late vitellogenesis (318 ± 224.00; P < 0.002; Figs. 6A and 8A) in relation to maturation (Figs. 6B and 8A), spawning (Figs. 6C and 8A), and postspawning/ resting periods (Figs. 6D and 8A), in which the GnRH-R expression was markedly reduced. This reduction is the consequence of a decrease in the expression of GnRH-R within positive cells (Fig. 8A) but also in the number or size of GnRH-R-expressing cells because the mean percentage of pituitary section occupied by GnRH-R-expressing cells also exhibited a dramatic reduction from vitellogenesis (22%, F = 14.661; P < 0.001) to maturation (7.75%), spawning (2.5%), and postspawning/resting (3%) periods (Fig. 8B).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To date, most information concerning the GnRH-R expression in the fish brain has been obtained by RT-PCR [21, 22, 24, 37, 38] and information on the precise sites of expression of the GnRH-Rs is limited to the rainbow trout [20]. This trout receptor is poorly expressed in the pituitary, but a conspicuous expression was detected in midbrain areas [20]. Surprisingly, this pattern of expression markedly differs from that observed in sea bass, in which a strong expression is detected in the pituitary and the forebrain, whereas no signal could be detected in the mesencephalon. Thus, the difference in the distribution of these receptors and their low level of identity probably reflects the fact that they represent different GnRH-R subtypes, most likely involved in different functions.
In 1998, Troskie et al. suggested that different GnRH receptor subtypes might have accompanied the evolution of the GnRH subtypes [25]. Analysis of the sequences of the extracellular loop 3 of these receptors, which is important for the ligand selectivity in mammalian receptors [39], allowed these authors to classify the receptors into three groups (type I, with subtypes IA and IB, and II). In fish, the presence of two different GnRH receptor subtypes has been described in goldfish [19], Haplochromis burtoni [22], medaka [23], and African catfish [24]. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the sea bass GnRH-R is closely related to those of perciforms and beloniforms, notably striped bass and medaka GnRH-R1, all intensely expressed in the pituitary. In contrast, the trout sequence falls in another branch, together with the medaka GnRH-R2 [23], the gene of which, similar to the trout GnRH-R gene, contains an additional exon [40]. Another fish species in which two GnRH-Rs have been reported is the goldfish [19], but the phylogenetic trees indicate that these are variant forms from the same subtype. In mammals, two different GnRH receptors have also been characterized [27, 28], and three distinct GnRH receptors seem to be present in several vertebrate classes [25, 26]. In the bullfrog, GnRH-R1 is intensely expressed in the pituitary whereas the GnRH-R2 has a low pituitary expression [26].
Comparing the distribution of GnRH-R and prepro- GnRH-ir fibers in sea bass brain [10], it seems evident that most GnRH-R-expressing cells appear in cell nuclei that mainly received sGnRH and sbGnRH projections. Thus, it appears that the GnRH-R of sea bass represents a receptor for the most abundant GnRHs in the forebrain of this species, sbGnRH and sGnRH. Supporting this assumption, this GnRH-R is highly expressed in sea bass pituitary gonadotrophic cells, which received sbGnRH and sGnRH fibers but not cGnRH-II projections [10], and seems to represent a GnRH receptor responsible for direct sbGnRH and/or sGnRH stimulatory actions on gonadotroph release. Moreover, significant differences in sea bass pituitary GnRH-R expression was observed during the reproductive cycle, showing the highest levels in November (late vitellogenesis). Interestingly, sbGnRH levels are also higher in this period, at least in male sea bass [9]. However, it is probable that more than one form of GnRH-R exists in the brain of sea bass, as it occurs in other vertebrates [25, 26]. In this sense, two types of GnRH-R sequences are expressed in Haplochromis burtoni (Perciformes) and medaka (Beloniformes) [22, 23].
In sea bass, GnRH-R-expressing cells were only evident in the pituitary, forebrain, and pineal. In the pituitary, labeling was restricted to the proximal pars distalis (PPD), and the external border of the pars intermedia, two regions that contain gonadotrophic cells [41]. This GnRH-R expression in sea bass pituitary was mainly detected in LH cells but also in some FSH cells, whereas somatotrophs appeared devoid of GnRH-R expression. Interestingly, in tilapia, gonadotrophic cells (FSH and LH) but not GH cells expressed type IA and IB GnRH-Rs, whereas GH cells but not gonadotrophic cells expressed a different type III GnRH-R [42].
Qualitative and quantitative analyses reveal that the pituitary expression of GnRH-R was higher in November (late vitellogenesis) than in December (maturation), February (spawning), or May (postspawning/resting). However, in this study, we are detecting GnRH-R mRNAs and not the functional proteins, and their profiles could differ along the sea bass reproductive cycle. In other fish species, it has also been shown that the number of pituitary GnRH receptors [43] or pituitary GnRH-R mRNA levels [21] varies over the maturation process. Furthermore, there is evidence demonstrating that GnRH induces the expression of its own receptor [44, 45]. Thus, in rat, the administration of low concentrations of GnRH is followed by an upregulation of GnRH receptor in the anterior hypophysis [44]. The treatment with sGnRH analogs also increases the number of high-affinity GnRH receptors in the goldfish pituitary [45].
In the sea bass brain, the highest GnRH-R expression was observed in the anteroventral part of the parvocellular preoptic nucleus during the spawning season. The presence of sGnRH and sbGnRH cells in the immediacy of this nucleus has previously been reported in sea bass [10, 31]. This nucleus also contains catecholaminergic cells in sea bass [46] and other teleost species [4749], which represent a source of dopaminergic projections reaching the pituitary and inhibiting the gonadotroph secretion [49]. Thus, the putative presence of GnRH-R in catecholaminergic cells of the anteroventral part of the parvocellular preoptic nucleus could represent a morphological substrate for GnRH-dopamine interactions, reinforcing the major role of this cell mass in the control of fish reproduction. However, such a role cannot be attributed to this nucleus in sea bass because the role of dopamine in regulating gonadotroph release in this species is rather dubious [50].
Other preoptic cell masses, as the parvocellular part of the parvocellular preoptic nucleus and the gigantocellular part of the magnocellular preoptic nucleus, also expressed GnRH-R in sea bass. These nuclei, which have been largely implicated in the control of pituitary functions and are considered as important neuroendocrine centers [51], represent a target for steroid hormones [47, 49, 52].
The presence of GnRH-Rs was also evident in ventral (Vv, Vc, Vi) and dorsal (Dc) telencephalic nuclei, in the anterior periventricular nucleus of the preoptic area, the lateral tuberal nucleus, and the nucleus of the lateral recess of the hypothalamus. In sea bass, these cell masses, as well as the parvocellular and magnocellular preoptic nuclei, have been implicated in the control of appetite and feeding and are known for the presence of neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide Y (PY), peptide YY [53, 54], galanin [55], and/or catecholamines [46]. The stimulatory effects of NPY on gonadotroph secretion have also been largely referred in teleosts, including sea bass [56, 57]. These NPY actions on gonadotroph secretion seem to exhibit seasonal variations [58]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that GnRH and NPY could cooperate to modulate the interactions between the reproductive and metabolic processes [59]. Interestingly, the GnRH-R expression in these nuclei rise significantly at the postspawning/resting period, when sea basses recuperate their feeding habits after a natural fasting period coincident with the maturation/spawning season. In this way, the presence of GnRH-R- and NPY-related peptide expression in the same nuclei could be implicated in the mediation of these metabolic and reproductive interactions.
The ventromedial thalamic nucleus of sea bass also expressed GnRH-R. In gilthead seabream, the presence of sbGnRH-expressing cells was also evident in the ventral thalamus [60]. Moreover, the existence of hypophysiotrophic neurons in the thalamus has been described in goldfish [51] and Apteronotus leptorynchus [61]. The thalamus of goldfish [62] and rainbow trout [47] also expressed steroid receptors, and electrical stimulation of the thalamus elicits reproductive behavior, including sex color change and gamete release, in the hermaphrodite sea bass Serranus subligarius [63]. Although GnRH-expressing cells were not detected in the thalamus of sea bass [10, 31], a conspicuous sGnRH and cGnRH-II innervation was present in the ventral thalamus of this species [10]. Thus, GnRH acting on thalamic GnRH-R could have a role in the regulation of similar events in sea bass.
In sea bass, GnRH-Rs were also present in the pineal gland. In fish, the pineal gland has endocrine cells but retains a photoreceptive function. The presence of GnRH and/ or GnRH-R in other visually related structures as the retina or the optic tectum has been extensively described [10, 20, 22, 64]. Based on these evidences, a role of GnRH in the coordination of visual sensory information has been proposed [22]. In this way, the presence of GnRH-R in a photoreceptive structure as the pineal gland of sea bass could reinforce this assumption.
In conclusion, the present study analyzes the expression of a GnRH-R cloned in the brain and pituitary of a perciform species along the reproductive cycle. The abundant expression of GnRH-R in pituitary gonadotrophs and forebrain neuroendocrine centers as well as the variation in GnRH-R expression along the reproductive cycle strongly suggest a relevant role of this receptor in the mediation of GnRH effects on the release of gonadotrophs and reproductive events. Furthermore, the quantitative analysis during the reproductive cycle reveals that GnRH-R expression is regulated in a different manner in the brain and the pituitary of sea bass.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Correspondence: José Antonio Muñoz-Cueto, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Ambientales, Universidad de Cádiz, Polígono Río San Pedro, 11510 Cádiz, Spain. FAX: 34 956 016019; munoz.cueto{at}uca.es ![]()
Received: 29 August 2003.
First decision: 21 September 2003.
Accepted: 2 January 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Moncaut, G. Somoza, D. M Power, and A. V M Canario Five gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptors in a teleost fish: isolation, tissue distribution and phylogenetic relationships J. Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 767 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||