Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print January 21, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.024331
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/5/1493    most recent
biolreprod.103.024331v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchler, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchler, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchler, K.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 70, 1493–1499 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.024331
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Ovary

Activin A and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Control Tight Junctions in Avian Granulosa Cells by Regulating Occludin Expression1

Michael K. Schuster, Bernhard Schmierer, Alena Shkumatava, and Karl Kuchler2

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Division of Molecular Genetics, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Medical Universityand Biocenter of Vienna, A-1030 Vienna, Austria


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Within the avian ovarian follicle, the oocyte is surrounded by a monolayer of granulosa cells, which exhibit pronounced epithelial properties. Here we demonstrate the presence of the major tight junction protein occludin in granulosa cells. As shown by immunohistochemistry, occludin localizes to the oocyte-facing granulosa cell surface. Occludin and thus tight junctions are dynamically regulated in a developmental stage-specific manner. Small white follicles, which have not yet started yellow yolk incorporation, show pronounced occludin expression in vitro and in vivo. By contrast, yellow yolk-incorporating small yellow follicles exhibit much lower levels of occludin, and hierarchical, preovulatory follicles are virtually devoid of this essential tight junction component. Using a primary granulosa cell culture system, we demonstrate that concerted action of two well-established ovarian growth regulators, follicle-stimulating hormone and activin A, leads to strong induction of occludin expression in vitro. We suggest that the stage-dependent decrease in the granulosa cell growth factor responsiveness triggers the disruption of tight junctions, enabling rapid and high capacity transport of macromolecules into the oocyte through a paracellular pathway. Such a high-capacity transport for yolk components may represent a crucial prerequisite for rapid oocyte growth once follicles have entered the follicular hierarchy.

activin, follicle-stimulating hormone, granulosa cells, ovary, ovulation


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In avian species, follicle development occurs in several phases. Already, at the embryonic stage, quiescent primordial follicles develop in the functional left ovary. During maturation of the bird, incorporation of protein-rich white yolk leads to the formation of small white follicles (SWF). In the mature laying hen (Gallus gallus), SWF continue to develop and eventually start lipid-rich yellow yolk incorporation to form small yellow follicles (SYF). However, most of the follicles primed, undergo atresia, an important apoptotic process that keeps the number of rapidly growing follicles reasonably small [1, 2]. Follicles maturing during the final rapid growth phase must obey the ovulatory hierarchy. Thereby, the largest F1 follicle will undergo ovulation within 1 day, followed in size by the F2 follicle prone to ovulation within the next 2 days. In the laying hen, a hierarchy is traceable to the F7 follicle, indicating that follicle growth from 8 mm (SYF) to about 40 mm diameter (F1) takes only 7 days. Within this period, a gain of yolk mass from 0.08 g in SYF to 14 g before ovulation (F1) equals an uptake of about 2 g lipoprotein per day [3].

Avian ovarian follicles contain concentric layers of membranes and cells surrounding the oocyte. The perivitelline layer (PVL), the avian homologue of the mammalian zona pellucida [4], organizes immediately adjacent to the oocyte and acts as the sperm receptor [57]. The PVL is produced at the lumenal face of chicken granulosa cells (cGCs), which are highly specialized epithelial cells of endodermal origin and organize along a basal membrane. Being the somatic cell type closest to the germ cell, cGC are thought to play important roles in the separation of somatic and germ cells as well as in establishing communication between them. On top of the basal membrane, two layers of mesenchymal theca cells contribute to the vascularized connective tissue in the follicle. The theca interna additionally serves important functions in growth factor secretion and steroidogenesis [8]. In contrast with mammalian species, where granulosa cells line the antrum of ovarian follicles maintaining follicular fluid homeostasis, avian ovarian follicles lack a comparable lumen. Instead, cGC engulf the whole germ cell, growth of which depends on rapid, efficient, and yet specific import of large amounts of liver-derived macromolecules through the unvascularized granulosa layer. Hence, lipoproteins may transverse cGC either by transcytosis or by paracellular transport routes. Earlier morphological studies provided evidence that the latter is responsible for satisfying the oocyte's enormous demand for yolk precursors during the rapid growth phase [9, 10]. Consequently, despite pronounced epithelial features of granulosa cells, at least a temporary absence of tight junctions has been proposed because a permanent one would certainly impair paracellular transport processes.

Tight junctions normally localize to the most apical region of lateral epithelial cell membranes [11]. They exert a barrier function by restricting paracellular permeability through epithelial layers and implement a fence by separating the plasma membrane into an apical and a basolateral domain [12]. A major component is occludin, an integral membrane protein with four predicted transmembrane domains localizing exclusively to tight junctional complexes [13, 14]. Occludin is directly involved in establishing cell- cell contacts because hydrophobic protein loops of adjacent tight junction strands on neighboring cells interact in a zipper-like fashion, bringing together neighboring plasma membranes so as to seal the intercellular space [15]. Despite its important function in tight junction organization [14, 16, 17], occludin displays pronounced interspecies sequence diversity, which made characterization in other species tedious [18]. The fairly conserved occludin carboxy- terminus binds to zonula occludens protein 1 (ZO-1) [19], a peripheral membrane protein that links occludin to intracellular actin filaments via {alpha}-catenin molecules [20]. Although ZO-1 localization is used as a tight junction marker, it is not restricted to tight junctions, but is also present in adherens junctions, where it colocalizes with cadherins [20].

In this study, we provide the first data on the presence and regulation of the tight junction protein occludin in avian granulosa cells. We demonstrate that occludin expression is shut down in a stage-specific manner during follicular maturation in vivo. Further, our results provide evidence that high occludin expression in cGC requires the synergistic action of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and activin A, two major regulators of ovarian development. According to our model, the high FSH and/or activin A responsiveness of cGC in SWF serves to maintain occludin expression and thus favors intact tight junctions, preventing paracellular transport processes. Upon decrease of cGC responsiveness to FSH and/or activin A, occludin expression disappears, tight junction complexes disintegrate, and paracellular transport can proceed.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used: 8-Br-cAMP, 8-Bromo-cAMP; Na, salt; AG99, {alpha}-cyano-(3,4-dihydroxy)cinnamide; Tyrphostin A46, Tyrphostin B40, CAS 118409-59-9; cGC, chicken granulosa cell; DAPI, 4,6- diamino-2-phenylindole; DMEM, Dulbecco modified Eagle medium; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, EGF receptor; FCS, fetal calf serum; FSHR, FSH receptor; INF{gamma}, interferon-{gamma}; KT5720, potent, specific, cell- permeable inhibitor of protein kinase A CAS 108068-98-0; MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney cells; PD98059, 2'-amino-3'-methoxyflavone, CAS 167869-21-8; PKA, protein kinase A, cAMP-dependent protein kinase; SWF, small white follicle; SYF, small yellow follicle; TGF{alpha}, transforming growth factor-{alpha}; TNF{alpha}, tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein; VLDLR, very low-density lipoprotein receptor; ZPC, zona pellucida protein C; ZO-1, zonula occludens protein 1; PVL: perivitelline layer.

Animals, cGC Isolation, and Cell Culture

Derco Brown laying hens were maintained on layer's mesh with water and feed provided ad libitum under a daily light period of 16 h. All animal experimentation was in compliance with the regulations of the animal ethics committee of the University of Vienna. Hens were killed by decapitation and cGC were isolated from large preovulatory follicles as described previously [21] using minor modifications [22]. Dispersed cells were plated in DMEM (cat. no. 41965; GibcoBRL Life Technologies, Invitrogen Ltd., Paisley, UK), supplemented with 5% FCS (Invitrogen Ltd.), 50 U/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 50 ng/ml (1.4 nM) human pituitary FSH (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), and 25 ng/ml (1.8 nM) human recombinant activin A (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The cGCs were cultivated under standard conditions (37°C, 5% CO2) and, after reaching confluency, further propagated by splitting 1:2. About 24 h before the start of an experiment, cells were growth-factor starved in medium lacking FSH and activin A. Growth-factor treatment was then carried out with the indicated amounts of FSH and activin A, while TGF{alpha} (R&D Systems) was used at 10 ng/ml concentration (1.6 nM). Inhibitors and activators were added 30 min before growth factor supplementation at the following concentrations 3 µM KT5720, 10 µM PD98059, 250 µM AG99 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), and 100 µM for 8-Br-cAMP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Protein Preparation, SDS-PAGE, and Immunoblotting

Cultured cGCs were lysed directly in culture dishes by addition of 30 µl/cm2 SDS-PAGE sample buffer (5% [v/v] glycerol, 1% [w/v] SDS, 2.5% [v/v] ß-mercaptoethanol, 30 mM Tris/HCl, pH = 6.8, 0.025% [w/v] bromphenol blue). After boiling extracts for 5 min, lysates were cleared and stored frozen at –20°C. Equal amounts of protein were separated through 10% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to Protran nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher and Schuell, Dassel, Germany). Membranes were stained with Ponceau S (Sigma-Aldrich, Corp., St. Louis, MO) to verify protein transfer and equal protein loading, followed by blocking with BLOTTO (5% [w/ v] fat-free milk powder in PBS, 0.1% [v/v] Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature. Antibody incubation was done overnight at 4°C using polyclonal rabbit anti-chicken occludin antibodies (cat. no. 71-1600; Zymed Laboratories, Inc.), polyclonal rabbit anti-ZO-1 antibodies (cat. no. 61- 7300; Zymed Laboratories Inc.) and mouse anti-pan-cadherin antibodies (Clone CH-19, cat. no. C1821; Sigma-Aldrich Corp.). After incubation with secondary goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Oncogene Research Products, EMD Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA) antibodies, each used at dilutions of 1:10 000, bands were visualized using ECL Western blotting detection system using conditions as suggested by the manufacturer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK). All data were compiled from at least three independent and representative experimental datasets.

Immunofluorescence and Immunohistochemistry

Preovulatory follicles and whole ovaries from adult laying hens were embedded in freezing agent and immediately shock frozen on dry ice. Cryosections of 20-µm thickness were prepared using a cryomicrotome (HM 500 OM, Microm Laboratories, Walldorf, Germany) and transferred onto Superfrost Plus slides (Menzel, Braunschweig, Germany). Alternatively, intact cGC sheets were isolated from preovulatory follicles and immediately spread on microscope slides. Granulosa cells in culture were grown on collagen I-coated glass slides (BD Biosciences, Erembodegem, Belgium). After fixation in a mixture of equal volumes acetone and methanol at –20°C for 15 min, sections, sheets, or cultured cells were rehydrated for 15 min in PBS at 37°C. Primary mouse anti-pan-cadherin and rabbit anti-occludin antibodies were used at dilutions of 1:500. Secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor series; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) were applied at dilutions of 1:500 in 1% (w/v) fat-free milk powder in PBS for 1 h at 37°C. After several PBS washes, the first of which contained DAPI to stain nuclear DNA, slides were mounted in fluorescence mounting medium (DakoCytomation A/S, Glostrup, Denmark) and inspected using an Axiovert 135 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) or a TCP SP2 laser-scanning spectral confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems Heidelberg GmbH, Bensheim, Germany).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Occludin is Highly Expressed In Vivo and Is Regulatedin a Stage-Specific Manner

To follow expression of occludin in vitro and in vivo, we performed immunoblotting experiments using extracts from cultured cGC and freshly isolated cGC sheets. For technical reasons, it is very difficult to impossible to isolate cGC from early follicular stages. As a consequence, protein extracts from SWF and SYF contained whole follicle material, whereas extracts from preovulatory F1 follicles represent isolated GC sheets (Fig. 1). SWF contained high levels of occludin; SYF, by contrast, showed clearly decreased expression. Importantly, occludin was almost undetectable in cGC from F1 preovulatory follicles (Fig. 1). Cadherin immunostaining served as loading control because its expression levels remained unchanged during follicular maturation. Thus, these data demonstrate a pronounced decrease of occludin expression during follicular maturation.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Occludin expression levels decrease with follicular maturation. Occludin protein levels decrease massively from small white follicles (SWF) to small yellow follicles (SYF). In isolated granulosa sheets from F1 follicles, occludin was undetectable. For technical reasons, SWF and SYF represent protein extracts from whole follicles, whereas F1 designates protein extracts from isolated and purified granulosa cell sheets. Immunodetection of cadherin protein levels served as a loading control

To verify the assumption that occludin immunoreactivity on immunoblots arises mainly from granulosa cells and to determine the intercellular and subcellular distribution of occludin, immunohistochemistry on cryosections of intact follicles as well as isolated granulosa sheets was performed. The aforementioned occludin immunoblots confirmed that the occludin antibodies were also suitable for immunofluorescence studies. Immunohistochemistry revealed that occludin was most abundantly expressed in cGC of SWF (Fig. 2). In terms of subcellular distribution, occludin was strongly enriched in the apical region of the granulosa layer, immediately adjacent to the oocyte (Fig. 2, A and C). Pan- cadherin antibodies served as counterstain to demonstrate the epithelial nature of granulosa cells, which exhibited a cobblestone morphology typical for epithelial cell types. The overlay in yellow indicated that cadherins and occludin colocalized in the apical region of the epithelial granulosa cell layer (Fig. 2, arrow in B and D). These experiments clearly attributed occludin to the granulosa layer and further supported the strong decrease of occludin levels during follicle development as seen on immunoblots (Fig. 1). Occludin was abundantly expressed in cGC up to the SWF stage, whereas it became virtually undetectable in cGC of SYF (Fig. 2E). Isolated cGC sheets from F1 follicles displayed punctuate staining patterns rather than the usual belt-like fluorescence (Fig. 2F). To seal the intercellular space, tight junctions have to circumvent the outside of whole cells. Hence, the observed intracellular staining suggests the absence of functional tight junctions. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry staining of sections from small white follicles of 3–8-mm diameter demonstrated that occludin is also expressed in these follicular stages preceding the rapid growth phase (data not shown). These results demonstrate that granulosa cells express occludin predominantly in early follicular stages in vivo; its cell surface localization suggests the presence of functional tight junctions in these stages. Furthermore, occludin expression strongly decreased during the small white to small yellow transition and remained low up to the F1 stage.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Occludin is expressed and properly localized in cGC of SWF but not at later stages of follicular maturation. Cryosections through avian ovaries (AE) or intact granulosa sheets from preovulatory follicles (F) were labeled with anti-occludin antibodies (green, A, C, E, F), anti-cadherin antibodies (red, B, D). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI to visualize DNA (blue). Small white follicles (AD) showed pronounced occludin staining in the apical region of the granulosa cell layer. Occludin colocalization with cadherins appears in yellow (B and D). In small yellow follicles (E), no distinct localization of occludin was observed. In isolated granulosa sheets from preovulatory follicles, occludin showed a dot-like intracellular distribution (F). The arrow in B indicates colocalization of cadherin and occludin in granulosa cells. GC, granulosa cells; TC, theca cells

Activin A and FSH Are Key Regulators of Occludin Expression in cGC

Tight junction disintegration may represent a functional adaptation of the epithelial barrier to satisfy altered permeability requirements. Nevertheless, important questions as to how these events are triggered at the molecular level in vivo and which signal transduction cascades are involved remained to be addressed. To identify growth factors implicated in occludin regulation, we took advantage of a recently established tissue culture system allowing for the long-term cultivation of primary untransformed cGC in a functionally differentiated state [22, 23]. Using this in vitro system, we have recently shown that activin A and FSH are required to maintain the functional polarity of cGC in vitro. Cells growing in the presence of these growth factors maintain an epithelial morphology seen in vivo, and they express granulosa cell markers at similar levels as in the in vivo situation [22, 23]. Immunoblotting of extracts from cultured cGC revealed that both FSH and activin A exerted a pronounced effect on occludin expression levels (Fig. 3). While activin A alone (Fig. 3, lane 2) and, to a lesser extent, FSH (Fig. 3, lane 5) elevated occludin levels, both hormones added simultaneously to cGC cultures acted in a synergistic manner (Fig. 3, lane 6), giving rise to high occludin levels. By contrast, TGF{alpha}, which has been previously demonstrated to exert adverse effects on cGC morphology and differentiation [22], suppressed occludin expression, even in combination with activin A (Fig. 3, lanes 3 and 4). The observed effects were not brought about by a general induction or repression of junctional proteins due to a change in cellular morphology because the levels of the tight junction- and adherens junction-associated protein ZO-1, as well as cadherin, remained constant under all applied conditions (Fig. 3). Hence, FSH signaling in combination with activin A must play a key role in tight junction formation or maintenance in cGC in vivo.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Expression levels of junctional proteins in cGC are modulated by activin A and FSH. Activin A induces occludin, and FSH acts synergistically with activin A, while TGF{alpha} suppresses occludin expression in the presence and in the absence of activin A. Immunoblots against ZO- 1 and cadherins indicate constant expression levels of these proteins, irrespective of the growth factors added to the culture medium. Cadherin immunoblotting served as a loading control

To identify cellular signaling components involved in this process, specific inhibitors of protein kinase A (KT5720), the epidermal growth factor receptor (AG99), and the MAP kinase kinase (PD98059) were exploited. As shown in Figure 4A, the PKA activator 8-Br-cAMP mimicked FSH action, whereas inhibition of PKA attenuated occludin induction by activin A/FSH or activin A/8-Br- cAMP (Fig. 4A). Strikingly, occludin induction by activin A alone was completely abolished by KT5720, indicating that activin A signaling requires basal PKA activity to induce occludin. A similar regulation pattern was observed for the intracellular activin A signal transducer Smad2 [23]. Blocking the upstream epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with AG99 or the MAP kinase kinase (MEK) with PD98059 augmented activin A-dependent occludin expression, fully consistent with a TGF{alpha}-triggered occludin repression (Fig. 4B). These results demonstrate the involvement of the EGFR and the MEK/ERK signaling pathway in the regulation of occludin in granulosa cells.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Epidermal growth factor receptor and PKA are implicated in occludin regulation. Chicken granulosa cells were cultured in the presence of growth factors activin A, FSH, and TGF{alpha} as indicated. Subsequent treatment with various inhibitory drugs and immunoblotting allowed for the identification of signaling components. A) Occludin induction by activin A is PKA dependent. While occludin is readily induced either by activin A alone (lane 3) or in combination with PKA activators such as FSH (lane 9) and 8-Br-cAMP (lane 10), the activin A-triggered induction is suppressed by concomitant addition of PKA inhibitor KT5720 (lane 4). B). TGF{alpha}-induced downregulation of occludin is MEK/ERK-dependent. TGF{alpha} suppresses occludin induction either alone (lane 3) or in combination with activin A (lane 4). However, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG99 (lane 6), as well as the MAP kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor PD98059 (lane 10), augments activin A- dependent occludin induction

Occludin Localizes to Granulosa Cell-Cell ContactsIn Vitro

To determine the subcellular localization of occludin in cultured cGC from preovulatory follicles, immunofluorescence experiments were carried out. In FSH-/activin A- treated cells, occludin was highly expressed and colocalized with cadherins to plasma membrane regions implicated in the formation of cell-cell contacts (Fig. 5). Such a distribution of occludin is consistent with the presence of intact and functional tight junctions. Control cells showed a similar morphology but a lack of occludin expression. Taken together, our studies clearly demonstrate that cGCs express occludin in a growth factor-dependent manner in vitro and in early follicular stages in vivo. Hence, our data provide compelling evidence for the existence of functional tight junctions that are regulated in granulosa cells during follicular maturation. In fact, the results suggest a simple model (Fig. 6) by which tight junction regulation occurs in vivo through the interplay of activin A and FSH. We propose that a decrease of cGC responsiveness toward these growth factors, as it occurs with progressing follicular maturation, leads to disruption of tight junctions, allowing for yolk precursors to reach the growing oocyte via paracellular transport, bypassing the transcytosis route through the epithelial granulosa layer (Fig. 6).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. FSH and activin A induce occludin expression. Immunofluorescence staining of occludin by confocal laser-scanning microscopy of cultured cGC, occludin (green) and cadherin (red). Upper panel: In untreated cells, occludin expression is virtually absent. Lower panel: Cells treated with FSH and activin A showed expression and correct membrane localization of occludin. Yellow staining indicates a colocalization of occludin and cadherin. Corresponding lower parts of upper and lower panels show optical sections perpendicular to the growth plane of the cell monolayer (Z-sections). Middle panel: Z-section blow-up of cells treated with FSH and activin A



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Model of tight junction regulation during avian ovarian follicle development. A) Activin A is abundant for cGC of ovarian follicles during early developmental stages. A high responsiveness of these cells to FSH leads to synergistic expression of occludin and thus functional tight junctions. Tight junctions prevent access of VLDL particles and vitellogenin to the VLDL receptor on the surface of the oocyte. B) With ongoing follicle development, activin A becomes less abundant for granulosa cells, while these cells produce increasing amounts of inhibin A and follistatin. Impaired activin signaling together with a decreased responsiveness to FSH result in a pronounced downregulation of occludin expression and thus in the destruction of tight junctions. Yolk precursors can readily access the VLDL receptors of the oocyte, facilitating the rapid yolk incorporation


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Occludin is a vital part of tight junctional complexes operating in all epithelial cells. Although its detailed physiological role in tight junction formation is ill defined, there is substantial evidence in the literature that obliteration of occludin function also disables tight junctions. For example, Raf-1-mediated downregulation of occludin in MDCK cells [24], as well as synthetic peptides resembling the second extracellular loop of occludin [25], debilitate tight junctions. Both studies observed a decrease of transepithelial electrical resistance and concomitant increase of paracellular flux, which is fully consistent with tight junction disintegration [26, 27]. Notably, an occludin deletion variant lacking the entire carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic domain expressed in MDCK cells [16] displayed a similar punctuate staining pattern as observed for granulosa sheets from preovulatory follicles. However, other recently identified tight junction components, like claudins [28, 29], have not been identified in avian granulosa cells. Although we cannot rule out an involvement of claudins in tight junction formation and homeostasis, an important role for occludin in the actual sealing process of intercellular spaces within epithelial barriers has been established [24, 25, 30, 31]. Consequently, occludin is a suitable marker to follow and detect tight junction regulation in cGC in vitro and in vivo.

We show that occludin is abundantly expressed in cGC during early stages of follicle development. The in vivo distribution of occludin within granulosa cells closely resembles the staining pattern found in the ovarian surface epithelium or even endothelial cells. Early developmental stages up to SWF display the typical belt-like staining pattern in the apical plasma membrane domain. Hence, cGCs are likely to exhibit tight junctions during early follicular stages. However, upon the transition from SWF to SYF, occludin expression strongly decreases, indicating tight junction disintegration with progressing follicle maturation, perhaps allowing for high-capacity transport processes to occur independent of the typical cGC transcytosis route. Interestingly, the decrease of occludin levels seems to directly precede yellow yolk incorporation, which occurs during the final rapid growth phase of the oocyte. According to our model (Fig. 6), granulosa cell tight junctions prevent massive yolk incorporation into slow-growing oocytes. Disintegration of this intercellular seal, which is brought about by growth factor-induced downregulation of occludin expression, opens the way for bulk yolk components to enter the oocyte and may play a major role in the rapid growth phase once follicles have been committed into the ovulatory hierarchy.

Tight junctions present in the monocellular granulosa layer are likely to form a diffusion barrier between the somatic body fluids and the developing germ cell. Hence, the rapid uptake of huge amounts of very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) and vitellogenin, two major yolk precursors, raises the question of how these large proteins and macromolecular complexes transverse the epithelial granulosa layer. There is morphological evidence that yolk precursors pass cGC paracellularly rather than being transported into the oocyte by transcytosis. The absolute mass of about 14 g of yolk precursors incorporated within only 7 days argues for paracellular transport due to its high capacity. Our data are supported by early electron microscopy studies of avian ovarian follicles in the hierarchical growth phase, which reported wide gaps between granulosa cells [9]. Moreover, numerous 20–30-nm particles, identified as VLDL particles, have been detected within the basal lamina, which is thought to act as a molecular sieve, as well as in spaces between granulosa cells [10].

The oocyte cell surface harbors receptors implicated in yolk lipoprotein precursor uptake, including the oocyte-specific 95-kDa VLDL receptor (VLDLR) [10, 32]. Genetic evidence for its role in uptake of two major yolk lipoprotein precursors, vitellogenin and very low-density lipoprotein, came from the nonlaying restricted ovulator (R/O) chicken strain, which carries a single mutation in the VLDL receptor gene [33]. As the VLDLR is only found in oocytes, but not in somatic cells such as cGCs, high efficient yolk uptake into the oocyte is likely to bypass the granulosa layer. No alternative receptor possibly mediating efficient or specific transcytosis in granulosa cells has been identified as yet. Hence, the absence of the VLDL receptor in cGC provides another strong argument for a paracellular lipoprotein transport route. The kinetics of lipoprotein uptake depend solely on the oocyte's receptor-mediated uptake capacity and the delivery of VLDL particles to the oocyte plasma membrane. It seems thus reasonable that a tightly sealed granulosa sheet serves an important function in maintaining small oocytes in a resting state by preventing immature follicles from yolk incorporation.

To explore tight junction regulation, we took advantage of a novel culture system for primary cGC [22]. We demonstrate that two major regulators of ovarian function, activin A and FSH, exert a strong effect on occludin regulation in vitro. Moreover, we show cooperation of FSH-triggered protein kinase A signaling with the activin pathway. Interestingly, the additive effect of FSH and activin A in occludin regulation appears as a common theme in the regulation of different genes within granulosa cells. In previous studies, we reported a similar regulation pattern of the intracellular signal transducer Smad2 [23], for the activin A antagonist inhibin {alpha}, and for the PVL component zona pellucida protein C [22]. Moreover, similar mechanisms operate in mammalian granulosa cells, giving rise to synergistic induction of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and cyclin D2 [34].

Based on our data, we postulate two plausible, not necessarily mutually exclusive, mechanisms for occludin downregulation during follicular development in vivo. Notably, there is good evidence in the literature for both mechanisms. First, the levels of required growth factors FSH and activin A decrease with increasing maturation, or at least cGC responsiveness toward them decreases. In the case of FSH, the first scenario seems to be predominant. FSH represents a well-established regulator of ovarian development. The cognate FSH receptor (FSHR) is most abundant in granulosa cells of early follicular stages [35]. In fact, FSH is considered as the essential survival factor for immature follicles. However, FSHR expression levels sharply decline at later developmental stages, perhaps causing the decreased responsiveness of cGC to FSH [35]. The signals responsible for a decrease in FSHR expression in vivo remain to be elucidated. However, we and others have shown that TGF{alpha} treatment decreases FSHR expression in chicken [22] and rat [36] granulosa cells in vitro. Hence, TGF{alpha} may represent a likely candidate to induce disruption of tight junctions by decreasing granulosa cell responsiveness toward FSH. Importantly, TGF{alpha} also interferes with activin A, the second growth factor required for high occludin expression. Activin A action is antagonized by TGF{alpha} in cultured cGC in many different respects [22]. However, TGF{alpha} additionally might exert more direct effects on occludin expression. As a ligand of the EGF-receptor, TGF{alpha} promotes activation of Raf-family members. Oncogenic Raf-1 downregulates occludin levels and may therefore disrupt tight junctions in MDCK cells [24], providing another feasible explanation for TGF{alpha}-induced repression of occludin expression in cultured cGC. Indeed, we show the direct involvement of this signaling pathway because inhibition, either at the level of the EGFR itself or blocking the downstream MAP kinases ERK1/ERK2, abrogates the inhibitory effects of TGF{alpha} on activin A-dependent occludin induction.

In the case of activin A, there is good evidence for the second proposed mechanism, namely reduced growth factor availability in maturing cGC. The availability of activin A decreases with ongoing follicle development, whereas expression of inhibin A increases [37]. Because increasing amounts of inhibin A interfere with activin A signaling, activin A action might be significantly impaired in all follicular stages except for SWF. Moreover, in later stages, activin A seems present predominantly in theca cells, whereas granulosa cells produce mainly inhibin A in steadily increasing amounts [38]. The maximum is not reached before the F1 stage [3941], arguing for an autocrine blockade of activin A action within granulosa cells. As free inhibin-{alpha}-subunit precursors compete with FSH for FSHR binding [42], production of high amounts of inhibin-{alpha} might further impair FSH signaling. In summary, there is evidence for several distinct hormonal effectors that exert a negative influence on signaling cascades that control occludin expression and thus tight junction formation. A decrease in FSHR expression and an increase in inhibin-{alpha}- subunit levels affect FSH signaling, while a decrease in activin A levels and an increase of inhibin A impair autocrine and paracrine signaling in follicles. Finally, TGF{alpha} severely impairs both pathways and is hence another putative regulator of tight junction formation during follicular maturation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Christoph Schüller, Yasmine Mamnun, and, in particular, Burgi Recheis, and Nina Bausek for critically reading the manuscript and for constructive feedback.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF), grant SFB-604 to K.K. M.K.S. and B.S. contributed equally to this work. Back

2 Correspondence: Karl Kuchler, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Division of Molecular Genetics, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Medical University and Biocenter of Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9/2, A-1030, Vienna, Austria. FAX: 43 1 4277 9618; karl.kuchler{at}univie.ac.at Back

Received: 15 October 2003.

First decision: 10 November 2003.

Accepted: 15 January 2004.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Tilly JL. Apoptosis and ovarian function. Rev Reprod 1996 1:162-172[Abstract]
  2. Gilbert AB, Perry MM, Waddington D, Hardie MA. Role of atresia in establishing the follicular hierarchy in the ovary of the domestic hen (Gallus domesticus). J Reprod Fertil 1983 69:221-227[Abstract]
  3. Perry MM, Gilbert AB, Evans AJ. Electron microscope observations on the ovarian follicle of the domestic fowl during the rapid growth phase. J Anat 1978 125:481-497[Medline]
  4. Wyburn GM, Aitken RN, Johnston HS. The ultrastructure of the zona radiata of the ovarian follicle of the domestic fowl. J Anat 1965 99:469-484[Medline]
  5. Howarth B. Carbohydrate involvement in sperm-egg interaction in the chicken. J Recept Res 1992 12:255-265[Medline]
  6. Howarth B. Avian sperm-egg interaction: perivitelline layer possesses receptor activity for spermatozoa. Poult Sci 1990 69:1012-1015[Medline]
  7. Bausek N, Waclawek M, Schneider WJ, Wohlrab F. The major chicken egg envelope protein ZP1 is different from ZPB and is synthesized in the liver. J Biol Chem 2000 275:28866-28872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Robinson FE, Etches RJ. Ovarian steroidogenesis during follicular maturation in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biol Reprod 1986 35:1096-1105[Abstract]
  9. Perry MM, Gilbert AB, Evans AJ. The structure of the germinal disc region of the hen's ovarian follicle during the rapid growth phase. J Anat 1978 127:379-392[Medline]
  10. Shen X, Steyrer E, Retzek H, Sanders EJ, Schneider WJ. Chicken oocyte growth: receptor-mediated yolk deposition. Cell Tissue Res 1993 272:459-471[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Farquhar MG, Palade GE. Junctional complexes in various epithelia. J Cell Biol 1963 17:357-412
  12. van Meer G, Simons K. The function of tight junctions in maintaining differences in lipid composition between the apical and the basolateral cell surface domains of MDCK cells. EMBO J 1986 5:1455-1464[Medline]
  13. Furuse M, Hirase T, Itoh M, Nagafuchi A, Yonemura S, Tsukita S. Occludin: a novel integral membrane protein localizing at tight junctions. J Cell Biol 1993 123:1777-1788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Chen Y, Merzdorf C, Paul DL, Goodenough DA. COOH terminus of occludin is required for tight junction barrier function in early Xenopus embryos. J Cell Biol 1997 138:891-899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Mitic LL, Anderson JM. Molecular architecture of tight junctions. Annu Rev Physiol 1998 60:121-142[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Balda MS, Whitney JA, Flores C, Gonzalez S, Cereijido M, Matter K. Functional dissociation of paracellular permeability and transepithelial electrical resistance and disruption of the apical-basolateral intramembrane diffusion barrier by expression of a mutant tight junction membrane protein. J Cell Biol 1996 134:1031-1049[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. McCarthy KM, Skare IB, Stankewich MC, Furuse M, Tsukita S, Rogers RA, Lynch RD, Schneeberger EE. Occludin is a functional component of the tight junction. J Cell Sci 1996 109:2287-2298[Abstract]
  18. Ando-Akatsuka Y, Saitou M, Hirase T, Kishi M, Sakakibara A, Itoh M, Yonemura S, Furuse M, Tsukita S. Interspecies diversity of the occludin sequence: cDNA cloning of human, mouse, dog, and rat- kangaroo homologues. J Cell Biol 1996 133:43-47[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Furuse M, Itoh M, Hirase T, Nagafuchi A, Yonemura S, Tsukita S. Direct association of occludin with ZO-1 and its possible involvement in the localization of occludin at tight junctions. J Cell Biol 1994 127:1617-1626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Itoh M, Nagafuchi A, Moroi S, Tsukita S. Involvement of ZO-1 in cadherin-based cell adhesion through its direct binding to alpha catenin and actin filaments. J Cell Biol 1997 138:181-192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Gilbert AB, Evans AJ, Perry MM, Davidson MH. A method for separating the granulosa cells, the basal lamina and the theca of the preovulatory ovarian follicle of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). J Reprod Fertil 1977 50:179-181[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Schmierer B, Schuster MK, Shkumatava A, Kuchler K. Activin and follicle-stimulating hormone signaling are required for long-term culture of functionally differentiated primary granulosa cells from the chicken ovary. Biol Reprod 2003 68:620-627[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Schmierer B, Schuster MK, Shkumatava A, Kuchler K. Activin A signaling induces Smad2, but not Smad3, requiring protein kinase A activity in granulosa cells from the avian ovary. J Biol Chem 2003 278:21197-21203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Li D, Mrsny RJ. Oncogenic Raf-1 disrupts epithelial tight junctions via downregulation of occludin. J Cell Biol 2000 148:791-800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Wong V, Gumbiner BM. A synthetic peptide corresponding to the extracellular domain of occludin perturbs the tight junction permeability barrier. J Cell Biol 1997 136:399-409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Itoh M, Nagafuchi A, Yonemura S, Kitani-Yasuda T, Tsukita S. The 220-kD protein colocalizing with cadherins in nonepithelial cells is identical to ZO-1, a tight junction-associated protein in epithelial cells: cDNA cloning and immunoelectron microscopy. J Cell Biol 1993 121:491-502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Stevenson BR, Siliciano JD, Mooseker MS, Goodenough DA. Identification of ZO-1, a high molecular weight polypeptide associated with the tight junction (zonula occludens) in a variety of epithelia. J Cell Biol 1986 103:755-766[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Tsukita S, Furuse M, Itoh M. Multifunctional strands in tight junctions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001 2:285-293[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Tsukita S, Furuse M. Claudin-based barrier in simple and stratified cellular sheets. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2002 14:531-536[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Nusrat A, Chen JA, Foley CS, Liang TW, Tom J, Cromwell M, Quan C, Mrsny RJ. The coiled-coil domain of occludin can act to organize structural and functional elements of the epithelial tight junction. J Biol Chem 2000 275:29816-29822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Bamforth SD, Kniesel U, Wolburg H, Engelhardt B, Risau W. A dominant mutant of occludin disrupts tight junction structure and function. J Cell Sci 1999 112:1879-1888[Abstract]
  32. Bujo H, Hermann M, Kaderli MO, Jacobsen L, Sugawara S, Nimpf J, Yamamoto T, Schneider WJ. Chicken oocyte growth is mediated by an eight ligand binding repeat member of the LDL receptor family. EMBO J 1994 13:5165-5175[Medline]
  33. Nimpf J, Radosavljevic MJ, Schneider WJ. Oocytes from the mutant restricted ovulator hen lack receptor for very low density lipoprotein. J Biol Chem 1989 264:1393-1398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. El-Hefnawy T, Zeleznik AJ. Synergism between FSH and activin in the regulation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and cyclin D2 expression in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 2001 142:4357-4362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. You S, Bridgham JT, Foster DN, Johnson AL. Characterization of the chicken follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (cFSH-R) complementary deoxyribonucleic acid, and expression of cFSH-R messenger ribonucleic acid in the ovary. Biol Reprod 1996 55:1055-1062[Abstract]
  36. Dunkel L, Tilly JL, Shikone T, Nishimori K, Hsueh AJ. Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor expression in the rat ovary: increases during prepubertal development and regulation by the opposing actions of transforming growth factors beta and alpha. Biol Reprod 1994 50:940-948[Abstract]
  37. Lovell TM, Gladwell RT, Groome NP, Knight PG. Ovarian follicle development in the laying hen is accompanied by divergent changes in inhibin A, inhibin B, activin A and follistatin production in granulosa and theca layers. J Endocrinol 2003 177:45-55[Abstract]
  38. Lovell TM, Gladwell RT, Cunningham FJ, Groome NP, Knight PG. Differential changes in inhibin A, activin A, and total alpha-subunit levels in granulosa and thecal layers of developing preovulatory follicles in the chicken. Endocrinology 1998 139:1164-1171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Davis AJ, Brooks CF, Johnson PA. Follicle-stimulating hormone regulation of inhibin alpha- and beta(B)-subunit and follistatin messenger ribonucleic acid in cultured avian granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 2001 64:100-106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Lovell TM, Vanmontfort D, Bruggeman V, Decuypere E, Groome NP, Knight PG, Gladwell RT. Circulating concentrations of inhibin-related proteins during the ovulatory cycle of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus) and after induced cessation of egg laying. J Reprod Fertil 2000 119:323-328[Abstract]
  41. Lovell TM, Knight PG, Groome NP, Gladwell RT. Changes in plasma inhibin A levels during sexual maturation in the female chicken and the effects of active immunization against inhibin alpha-subunit on reproductive hormone profiles and ovarian function. Biol Reprod 2001 64:188-196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Schneyer AL, Sluss PM, Whitcomb RW, Martin KA, Sprengel R, Crowley WF Jr. Precursors of alpha-inhibin modulate follicle-stimulating hormone receptor binding and biological activity. Endocrinology 1991 129:1987-1999[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
H. A. Adissu, E. K. Asem, and S. A. Lelievre
Three-Dimensional Cell Culture to Model Epithelia in the Female Reproductive System
Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2007; 14(8_suppl): 11 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. B. Hoffman, A. P. Benson, V. L. Christensen, B. D. Fairchild, and A. J. Davis
Follicular Development and Expression of the Messenger Ribonucleic Acid for the Inhibin/Activin Subunits in Two Genetic Lines of Turkey Hens that Differ in Total Egg Production
Poult. Sci., May 1, 2007; 86(5): 944 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. Sato, Y. Kanai, T. Noma, M. Kanai-Azuma, S. Taya, T. Matsui, M. Ishii, H. Kawakami, M. Kurohmaru, K. Kaibuchi, et al.
A close correlation in the expression patterns of Af-6 and Usp9x in Sertoli and granulosa cells of mouse testis and ovary
Reproduction, November 1, 2004; 128(5): 583 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/5/1493    most recent
biolreprod.103.024331v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchler, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchler, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchler, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS