Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 11, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.023895
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/6/1658    most recent
biolreprod.103.023895v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chauhan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chauhan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chauhan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 70, 1658–1663 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.023895
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Pregnancy

Studies on the Effects of the N-Terminal Domain Antibodies of CalcitoninReceptor-Like Receptor and Receptor Activity–Modifying Protein 1 on CalcitoninGene-Related Peptide-Induced Vasorelaxation in Rat Uterine Artery1

M. Chauhan3, P.R.R. Gangula3, S.J. Wimalawansa4, and C. Yallampalli2,3

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,3 University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1062 Department of Endocrinology,4 Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903-0019


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The vascular relaxation sensitivity to calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is enhanced during pregnancy, compared with nonpregnant human and rat uterine arteries. In the rat uterine artery, two types of CGRP receptors have been shown to coexist, CGRP-A receptor, which is a complex of calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR), and receptor activity–modifying protein (RAMP1) and CGRP-B receptor, which is different from CRLR. In the present study, we hypothesized that: 1) CGRP-induced vasorelaxation in rat uterine artery is mediated through CGRP-A receptor and 2) N-terminal (Nt) domain of CRLR (Nt-CRLR) has a major contribution in ligand binding and mediating CGRP- induced relaxation effects in rat uterine artery. Polyclonal antibodies against Nt-domain of CRLR and RAMP1 (Nt-RAMP1) were raised in rabbits and characterized for their specificity and were used to inhibit CGRP-induced vasorelaxation in rat uterine artery. For vascular relaxation studies, uterine arteries from Day 18 pregnant rats were isolated, and responsiveness of the vessels to CGRP was examined with a small vessel myograph. CGRP (10–10 to 10–7 M) produced a concentration-dependent relaxation of norepinephrine-induced contractions in Day 18 pregnant rat uterine arteries. These effects were significantly (P < 0.05) inhibited when uterine arteries were incubated with the antibody raised against Nt-CRLR (PD2 = 6.75 ± 0.20) and were totally abolished in presence of antibodies for both Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 (PD2 = 6.14 ± 0.35). In contrast, a monoclonal antibody for CGRP-B receptor had no effect on CGRP-induced rat uterine artery relaxation. These studies suggest that CGRP effects in rat uterine artery are mediated through CGRP-A receptor and that Nt-domain of CRLR may play a predominant role in CGRP binding and thus in causing CGRP-induced uterine artery relaxation.

neuropeptides, pregnancy, uterus


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) belongs to calcitonin family of peptides, and the members of this family are: calcitonin, amylin, two CGRP peptides (CGRP{alpha} and CGRPß), and adrenomedullin. CGRP{alpha} and CGRPß differ from each other by three amino acids, and CGRP{alpha} is the predominant form present in circulation [15]. Both of these CGRP peptides are indistinguishable in their biological activities, which include regulation of vascular tone, neurotransmission, and relaxation of smooth muscles of numerous tissues including uterus [69]. CGRP induces relaxation of uterus during pregnancy but not during labor, implicating a role in maintaining uterine quiescence during pregnancy [810]. In addition, CGRP has been shown to reverse hypertension and fetal growth restriction in nitro-l- arginine methyl ester-treated pregnant rats [11]. Despite the clinical implication of CGRP, therapeutic strategies targeting CGRP receptors have been hindered by the lack of knowledge on functional CGRP receptors.

Although several pharmacological and biochemical studies provide evidence for CGRP receptor heterogeneity, the identity and structure/function relationship of the receptor(s) that bind CGRP have been unclear. Several putative receptors from different mammalian sources have been reported to bind CGRP and activate CGRP-induced secondary messengers. Among these receptors, calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR), which requires an accessory protein, receptor activity modifying protein (RAMP1) is perhaps the most studied CGRP receptor [12]. However, based on the pharmacological studies using affinity of an antagonist to the receptor CGRP8–37 and a linear analog of CGRP, [acetamido-methylcysteine2,7] {alpha}-CGRP, CGRP receptors were previously classified as CGRP1 and CGRP2 receptors [2, 13, 14]. However, these differential affinity studies have been inconsistent, and several recent reports questioned the existence of separate CGRP2 receptors [1517]. Recently we reported existence of a CGRP receptor that is different from CRLR [18, 19]. We have previously shown that a monoclonal antibody to the ligand affinity- purified CGRP receptor specifically detects a 66-kDa protein in rat and human tissues [10, 2022], which is not CRLR. Based on these findings, CGRP receptors are now classified as CGRP-A and CGRP-B receptors [19]. CGRP-A receptors consist of CRLR, a seven-transmembrane domain class B G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR), and require a single transmembrane domain accessory protein, RAMP1, to become a functional CGRP receptor and CGRP-B receptor, which is not related to CRLR [18, 19].

CRLR contains a large N-terminal (Nt) domain and six highly conserved cysteine residues that form disulfide bonds [23]. Secondary structure prediction of RAMP1 also shows a large Nt domain. There is a growing body of data supporting the involvement of Nt domain of class B GPCRs in ligand receptor activation [2426]. We hypothesize that Nt domain of CRLR and RAMP1 may be actively involved in determining CGRP binding and specificity and that CGRP-induced relaxation effects in the uterine artery are mediated through Nt-CRLR. Current studies report generation of polyclonal antibodies to the Nt domain of CRLR and RAMP1 and their characterization. We used these antibodies to determine the role of Nt domain of CGRP-A receptor components, CRLR and RAMP1, in CGRP-induced vasorelaxation in rat uterine artery. We also assessed the effects of monoclonal antibodies to CGRP-B receptor to determine the CGRP receptor type involved in CGRP- induced uterine artery relaxation in pregnant rats. We show that Nt domain of CRLR is the major determinant of CGRP-induced relaxation of rat uterine arteries.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Timed-pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats on Day 14 of gestation (300– 320 g BW) were purchased from Harlan Sprague Dawley (Houston, TX) and maintained on a 12L:12D schedule. Animals received an ad libitum supply of rat chow and water. The Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas approved all procedures.

Generation of Polyclonal Antibodies

Full length N-terminal domains of CRLR and RAMP1 were cloned, expressed and purified from Escherichia coli (data not shown). Purified recombinant Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 proteins were used to raise polyclonal antibodies in rabbits. Briefly, 100 µg of Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 proteins were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and the acrylamide gel containing the electrophoresed protein was finely minced and injected into rabbits after collecting the pre-immune serum. Booster injections, with the same amount of protein were given to rabbits at four, eight, and sixteen weeks and serum was collected at seventeen weeks. The antisera for both Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 were tested for its titer by ELISA.

Characterization of the Polyclonal Antibodies

Polyclonal antibodies were characterized for specificity and linearity by Western immunoblotting. Increasing amounts of Nt-CRLR (5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 ng) and Nt-RAMP1 protein (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 µg), were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were then incubated with the respective antibodies (1:5000) followed by three washes with 1x TTBS buffer (10mM Tris, 0.05% Tween 20 and 0.9% NaCl) for 10 min each. The membranes were then incubated with 1:5000 dilution of anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) in 1x TTBS containing 10% non-fat dairy milk for 1 hour. The membranes were then washed with 1x TTBS and developed using the ECL system (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK). The blot was exposed to X-ray film and developed for visualization of protein bands. The linearity of the antibodies was assessed by correlating the immunoreactive band densities with the increasing amounts of Nt-CRLR or Nt-RAMP1 protein used.

The specificity of the antibodies was investigated by using antibody that was preadsorbed with the respective antigen. Briefly 32 µg of Nt- CRLR or Nt-RAMP1 antibody was incubated overnight with 320 µg of the respective antigen at 4°C in 100 µl of phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4. The reaction mixture was then centrifuged for 10 min at 15800 x g and the supernatant was used as primary antibody after making the required dilution with 1 x TTBS (1:5000). The primary antibodies to Nt- CRLR and Nt-RAMP1, with or without preadsorption were used in the western blotting. The protocol for western immunoblot was similar to that mentioned above. Briefly, 1 µg of the purified Nt-CRLR or Nt-RAMP1 protein and 20 µg of membrane protein from rat uterine tissue homogenate were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE followed by transfer onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Nitrocellulose membrane was either immunoblotted with the respective antibody or with antisera preadsorbed with the respective antigen.

Preparation of Membrane Protein from Pregnant Rat Uterus

Tissue from pregnant rat uterus (100 mg) was homogenized in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 120 mM NaCl; 0.4% NP-40; 100 mM NaF; 200 mM NaVO5; 1 mM PMSF; 10 µg/ml leupeptin; 10 µg/ml aprotinin). The homogenate was incubated on ice for 20 minutes and tissue debris was removed by centrifugation (14000 x g, 30 minutes). The supernatant containing the membrane protein was used for assessing the specificity of Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 antibodies.

Cell Culture and Construction of Stable Cell Lines Expressing CRLR and RAMP1

Human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) (ATCC, Manassas, VA) cells were cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (ATCC) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin, and 1% streptomycin. Cells were incubated at 37°C under the atmosphere of 95% air:5% CO2. For stable expression, cells were plated in 60 mm plates to a density of 1.5 x 105 cells/plate and transfected with plasmid pcDNA 3 encoding CRLR and RAMP1 (1 µg/well). Transfection was carried out using Lipofectamine according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). HEK-293 cells stably expressing CRLR and RAMP1 were generated by antibiotic G-418 selection of transfected cells.

Visualization of Cell Surface Expression of CRLR and RAMP1

The antibodies to Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 were further tested for specificity in HEK293 cells stably transfected with pcDNA3 expressing CGRP receptor components, CRLR and RAMP1. HEK293 cells transfected with pcDNA3 containing CRLR and RAMP1 were grown for 24 hours on Lab-Tek tissue culture slides. The cells were fixed with 70% acetone for ten minutes at room temperature followed by washing with PBS. The cells were then incubated either with primary antibodies to Nt-CRLR or Nt-RAMP1, with and without primary antibodies preadsorbed with respective antigens or without any antisera in blocking buffer for one hour. The cells were washed in blocking buffer and were further incubated in the same buffer with Alexa Flour 594 dye conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Vector Laboratories Inc. Burlingame, CA) for one hour at room temperature. The cells were then washed three times with PBS followed by the addition of mounting medium. The cell surface expression of CRLR and RAMP1 were observed under UV fluorescent microscope (OLYMPUS BX60, Tokyo, Japan).

Effects of CGRP Receptor Antibodies on CGRP-Induced Uterine Artery Relaxation

Pregnant rats on day 18 of gestation (250–300 g body weight [BW]) were used in the present study. Rats were deeply anesthetized by an i.p. injection of ketamine (45 mg/kg BW; Fort Dodge Laboratory, Fort Dodge, IA) and xylazine (5 mg/kg BW; Phoenix Scientific, Inc., St. Louis, MO), and the uterine artery was carefully dissected. Uterine artery rings (2 mm length, 400 µm in diameter) were obtained from the main uterine artery between the middle and lower third of the vascular arcade and placed in physiological salt solution (PSS) kept on ice (pH 7.4). Uterine artery rings were mounted in the jaws of a wire myograph (Kent Scientific, Litchfield, CT) for the measurement of isometric tension [27]. The unstretched vessel rings were allowed to equilibrate for 15 min in PSS that was gassed in 95% air:5% CO2 to maintain pH 7.4 at 37°C. The vessel rings were stretched to a predetermined length that was equivalent to an internal diameter of approximately 400 µm and allowed to equilibrate for another 15 min. The vessels were contracted with 5 µM norepinephrine (NE) until reproducible contractile responses were obtained (three to four times). Each time the artery rings were incubated with NE for 5 min and washed with PSS for another 5 min. Vascular contraction to cumulative doses of NE (10–7 to 10–4 M) were measured to obtain maximal contraction responses for each vessel. The relaxation response to cumulative additions of CGRP (10–10 to 10–7 M) was assessed in uterine artery rings that were precontracted with ED70 concentration of NE. Similar to previous reports [27] we found that ED70 dose of NE maintains contraction response over a longer period of time, and therefore we used this dose for the measurement of vasorelaxation effects of CGRP. The artery rings were incubated with each dose of CGRP for 2 min or until relaxation was stabilized. The relaxation responses of each CGRP dose were calculated as a percentage of tension generated by NE at ED70 dose. In all of these studies, the amplitude of the contraction to NE or relaxation response to CGRP was measured.

The antibodies to Nt-CRLR or Nt-RAMP1 generated and characterized in this study and a previously characterized monoclonal antibody to CGRP-B receptor [13] were utilized to assess the receptor type involved in CGRP signaling in the rat uterine artery. Polyclonal antibodies to Nt- CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 or monoclonal antibody to CGRP-B were added to the muscle bath containing uterine artery segments for 20 min prior to the addition of cumulative doses of CGRP. Preimmune serum from the rabbits was used as control for polyclonal antibodies. In addition, effects of Nt-CRLR antisera preadsorbed with the Nt-CRLR protein prior to adding to the muscle bath was also studied. Varying doses (10–10 to 10–7 M) of CGRP were then added in a cumulative manner and relaxation responses were measured.

Statistics

The change in initial tension of uterine artery rings in response to CGRP was calculated as a percentage of precontraction induced by NE. The PD2 (–logEC50), or concentration of the agent that inhibited 50% of the maximal contraction, was calculated using a nonlinear regression curve (Prism GraphPad Software, Inc, San Diego, CA) from the individual concentration-response relationships. The concentration-response curves were also compared by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. The data are expressed as means ± SEM for three to five animals per group. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characterization of Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 Polyclonal Antibodies

Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 polyclonal antibodies were characterized by studying the linear reaction of the antibodies with their respective antigen and neutralizing the antibody with the antigen. As shown in Figure 1, A and B, both Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 antibodies showed a linear reaction with increasing amounts of the respective antigen until a plateau was reached. Anti–Nt-CRLR detects a 58- kDa protein in rat uterine membrane and anti–Nt-RAMP1 detects a RAMP1 (16-kDa) protein in the rat uterus. Figure 1, C and D, demonstrate that the detection of these bands by the antibodies was blocked when the antibodies were preadsorbed with their respective antigen prior to use in Western immunoblotting. These data indicate that both Nt- CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 antibodies are specific to the N-terminal domain of CRLR and RAMP1.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Characterization of Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 polyclonal antibodies. A) Linear reaction of Nt-CRLR polyclonal antibody with increasing amount of recombinant Nt-CRLR protein. B) Linear reaction of Nt-RAMP1 polyclonal antibody with increasing amount of recombinant Nt-RAMP1 protein. C) Western immunoblot showing blocking of specific band with Nt-CRLR antibody preadsorbed with Nt-CRLR recombinant protein. Lane 1: Nt-CRLR protein. Lane 2: 20 µg of rat uterine membrane protein. Note that anti-CRLR specifically detects a 58-kDa CRLR receptor protein in rat uterus. D) Western immunoblot showing blocking of specific band with Nt-RAMP1 antibody preadsorbed with Nt-RAMP1 recombinant protein. Lane 1: Nt-RAMP1 protein. Lane 2: 20 µg of rat uterine membrane protein. Note that anti-RAMP1 specifically detects a 16-kDa RAMP1 protein in rat uterus

Visualization of Cell Surface Expression of CRLR and RAMP1

It is well established that CRLR and RAMP1, when expressed together, are transported to the cell membrane [12, 2830]. Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 polyclonal antibodies were further tested by immunofluorescent localization of these receptors on HEK-293 cells stably transfected with CRLR and RAMP1. Specific immunoflorescent staining of both these receptor components on the plasma membrane was observed as shown in Figure 2. Specificity of these antibodies was further demonstrated by the absence of staining in HEK-293 cells, when antibodies were either eliminated (Fig. 2A) or preadsorbed with respective antigens (Fig. 2B).



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Visualization of CRLR and RAMP1 on the cell surface, using Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 polyclonal antibodies. HEK-293 cells transfected with CRLR and RAMP1 were incubated either without antisera (A) or with antisera preadsorbed with respective antigen (B), rabbit polyclonal antibody to Nt-CRLR (C), or Nt-RAMP1, followed by Alexa Flour 594 dye conjugated goat-antirabbit secondary antibody to label the indicated protein. Anti–Nt-CRLR and anti–Nt-RAMP1 specifically detected their respective protein on the cell membrane

Vasorelaxation Studies Using Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 Polyclonal Antibodies and CGRP-B Monoclonal Antibody

CGRP (10–10 to 10–7 M) produced a dose-dependent relaxation in rat uterine artery rings precontracted with NE. Incubation of uterine artery segments with Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 polyclonal antibodies in combination (1:20 000 dilutions each) or with Nt-CRLR antibody alone showed a significant inhibitory effect on the CGRP-induced relaxation of the vessel as compared with the preimmune serum (Fig. 3). In these studies, 1:20 000 dilution of antibodies was found to be optimal based on our pilot observations utilizing 1:40 000 to 1:1000 dilutions (data not shown). The effects of the anti–Nt-CRLR were more substantial as compared with the anti–Nt-RAMP1 on the CGRP-induced vasorelaxation. CGRP-induced uterine artery relaxation was completely abolished when the uterine artery segments were preincubated with the combination of both antibodies (anti–Nt-CRLR + anti–Nt-RAMP1) at the same dilution. The PD2 values for CGRP-induced relaxation in the presence of Nt-CRLR and Nt-CRLR + Nt-RAMP1 antibody were 6.75 ± 0.20 and 6.14 ± 0.35, respectively (P < 0.05), compared with that of preimmune serum (8.0 ± 0.10). The inhibitory effects of antibodies to RAMP1 on CGRP-induced vasorelaxation showed limited dose response (PD2: 7.9 ± 0.14). Because the inhibitory effects of antibodies to Nt-CRLR alone were substantial, we further assessed the specificity of this effect by preadsorbing the antisera with Nt-CRLR protein. The inhibitory effects of Nt-CRLR antibody on CGRP-induced vasorelaxation were completely blocked by the preadsorbed antisera (PD2: –8.03 ± 0.09; Fig. 3). We next investigated the effects of CGRP-B receptor monoclonal antibody on CGRP-induced vasorelaxation in uterine artery segments. As shown in Figure 4, CGRP-B receptor antibody has no effects on CGRP-induced vasorelaxation. Thus, these studies support our hypothesis that CGRP-induced uterine artery relaxation requires CGRP-A receptors and that the Nt-domain of CRLR may be more critical in eliciting CGRP-induced vasorelaxation in rat uterine artery.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Effects of polyclonal antibodies to Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 on vascular relaxation responses to cumulative doses of CGRP (10–10 to 10–7 M) in uterine artery of Day 18 pregnant rats. Uterine arteries were preincubated for 20 min with 1:20 000 dilution of the preimmune serum, anti–Nt-CRLR, anti–Nt-RAMP1, combination of both polyclonal antibodies (1:1), or Nt-CRLR antibody preadsorbed with Nt-CRLR. The initial tension of each CGRP dose was calculated as a percentage of precontraction by NE (100%). The percentage of initial tension for all the doses of CGRP was compared by repeated-measures ANOVA. Each point represents mean ± SEM, n = 3–5. *P < 0.05 for anti–Nt-CRLR, anti–Nt-RAMP1, or combination (anti–Nt-CRLR + Nt-RAMP1), compared with preimmune serum, Nt-CRLR antibody preadsorbed with Nt-CRLR, or control



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Effect of CGRP-B monoclonal antibody on vascular relaxation responses to cumulative doses of CGRP in the uterine artery of Day 18 pregnant rats. Graphs show the concentration-response relationship for CGRP-induced relaxation in the absence (control) and presence of CGRP-B antibody. The percentage of the initial tension of each CGRP dose was calculated as a percentage of precontraction by NE (100%). As shown, CGRP-B antibody did not alter the inhibitory effects of CGRP on uterine artery relaxation. Each point represents ± SEM, n = 3


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We recently reported that CGRP induces relaxation of isolated rings of rat uterine artery and further demonstrated the existence of two types of CGRP receptors, CGRP-A and CGRP-B, in rat uterine artery [31]. The uterine artery relaxation effects of CGRP are substantially greater in pregnant rats and female sex steroid hormone-treated nonpregnant ovariectomized rats, compared with those in the nonpregnant rats at diestrus stage [31, 32]. The current study was undertaken to assess the receptor type involved in CGRP-induced vasorelaxation in rat uterine artery by using specific antibodies.

In this study we generated specific polyclonal antibodies to N-terminal domains of CRLR and RAMP1. The specificity of the antibodies was assessed by Western immunoblotting as shown in Figure 1 and immunocytolocalization of CRLR and RAMP1 in HEK-293 cells transfected with CRLR and RAMP1 (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 2, anti– Nt-CRLR and anti–Nt-RAMP1 specifically detect their respective proteins on cell surface in HEK-293 cells transfected with CRLR and RAMP1. In both these methods, the ability of antibody to recognize the antigen was lost with the omission of primary antibody or by neutralization of antibodies with respective antigen protein. Thus, based on these characterization studies, the antibodies are specific to the Nt-domains of CRLR and RAMP1 (CGRP-A receptor components).

In the current study, we used these receptor-specific antibodies to CGRP-A receptor (generated and characterized in this study) and CGRP-B receptor [19] to assess the receptor type involved in mediating CGRP effects in rat uterine artery. CGRP-induced vasorelaxation in pregnant rat uterine artery is blocked when arteries are incubated with the combination of Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 antibodies (Fig. 3). Nt-CRLR antibody alone is sufficient to substantially block CGRP effects, whereas smaller effects were observed with Nt-RAMP1 antibody. These data suggest the involvement of Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 in CGRP actions and that CRLR N-terminal domain plays a major role in CGRP-induced vasorelaxation. Present data further support the distinct CGRP receptor pharmacology acquired by CRLR in the presence of RAMP1 and indicate either a direct participation of RAMP1 in forming a selective binding pocket for CGRP or an indirect conformational effect on CRLR to induce optimal CGRP binding [24]. In contrast to the profound effects of Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 antibodies, the effects of antibodies to CGRP-B receptor were insignificant (Fig. 4). Because the combination of Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 antibodies could block only 80% of the CGRP-induced relaxation (Fig. 3), the remaining 20% relaxation response may be mediated through other CGRP receptors such as CGRP-B. This is supported by our recent findings that both CGRP-A and CGRP-B receptors are expressed in rat uterine artery [31]. On the other hand, lack of effects of CGRP-B receptor antibodies (Fig. 4) could also result from the possibility that the antigenic epitope on the receptor may not be exposed and thus may not be accessible to the antibody. However, lack of involvement of CGRP-B receptors in CGRP action in uterine artery are further supported by our recent finding that CGRP-B receptor protein levels remain constant at all stages of gestation in rat uterine artery [31], whereas expression of CRLR and RAMP1 protein show an increase with pregnancy as compared with nonpregnant rats (unpublished data). Furthermore, this study, together with our recent report in which we have shown that mRNA levels of CRLR and RAMP1 increased with pregnancy, supports our hypothesis that CGRP effects in pregnant rat uterine artery are primarily mediated through CRLR and RAMP1 [31].

This study shows that Nt-CRLR and Nt-RAMP1 are involved in direct CGRP binding and action. Inhibitory effects of antibodies to Nt-CRLR are more substantial, compared with Nt-RAMP1, suggesting that the antibody binding to the CRLR N-terminal domain may be critical for ligand- induced signaling. A recent study reported that the extracellular domain of RAMP1 is sufficient for normal association with CRLR and that the transmembrane domain contributes to the CGRP affinity and potency [33]. This supports our data, shown in Figure 3, demonstrating inhibitory effects of anti–Nt-RAMP1, although to a lesser extent than Nt-CRLR or Nt-CRLR + Nt- RAMP1 antibody, and that Nt-RAMP1 interacts with either CRLR or CGRP or with both. Defining the precise nature of interaction among CRLR, CGRP, and RAMP1 is important and requires detailed structural and functional studies. However, the present study implies that the major signaling events of CGRP action in the rat uterine artery are mediated through CGRP- A receptor and that polyclonal antibodies for the Nt-domains of CRLR and RAMP1 generated in this study could be useful tools in differentiating functional CGRP receptor type in different tissues.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Grant support received from National Institutes of Health Grants HL58144, HL72650, and HD40828. Back

2 Correspondence: Chandrasekhar Yallampalli, D.V.M., Ph.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 301 University Blvd., Medical Research Building, Room 11.138, Galveston, TX 77555-1062. FAX: 409 747 0475; chyallam{at}utmb.edu Back

Received: 3 October 2003.

First decision: 30 October 2003.

Accepted: 30 January 2004.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Aiyar N, Rank K, Elshourbagy NA, Zeng Z, Adanou JE, Bergsma DJ, Li Y. A cDNA encoding the calcitonin gene-related peptide type 1 receptor. J Biol Chem 1996 271:11325-11329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wimalawansa SJ. Amylin, calcitonin gene-related peptide, calcitonin, and adrenomedullin: a peptide superfamily. Crit Rev Neurobiol 1997 11:167-239[Medline]
  3. Amara SG, Jonas V, Rosenfeld MG, Ong ES, Evans RM. Alternative RNA processing in calcitonin gene expression generates mRNAs encoding different polypeptide products. Nature 1982 298:240-244[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Rosenfeld MG, Mermod JJ, Amara SG, Swanson LW, Swchenko PE, Rivier J, Vale WW, Evans RM. Production of a novel neuropeptide encoded by the calcitonin gene via tissue-specific RNA processing. Nature 1983 304:129-135[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Foord SM, Marshall FH. RAMPs: accessory proteins for seven transmembrane domain receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1999 20:184-187[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Muff R, Born W, Fischer JA. Calcitonin, calcitonin gene-related peptide, adrenomedullin and amylin: homologous peptides, separate receptors and overlapping biological actions. Eur J Endocrinol 1995 133:17-20[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Poyner DR. Calcitonin gene-related peptide: multiple actions, multiple receptors. [Review; 160 refs]. Pharmacol Ther 1992 56:23-51[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Samuelson UE, Dalsgaard CJ, Lundberg JM, Hokfelt T. Calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibits spontaneous contractions in human uterus and fallopian tubes. Neurosci Lett 1985 62:225-230[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Dong Y-L, Gangula PRR, Fang L, Wimalawansa SJ, Yallampalli C. Uterine relaxation responses to calcitonin gene-related peptide and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors decreased during labor in rats. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998 179:497-506[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Dong Y-L, Fang L, Kondapaka S, Gangula PR, Wimalawansa SJ, Yallampalli C. Involvement of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the modulation of human myometrial contractility during pregnancy. J Clin Invest 1999 104:559-565[Medline]
  11. Yallampalli C, Dong YL, Wimalawansa SJ. CGRP reverses the hypertension and significantly decreases the fetal mortality in preeclampsia rats induced by nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. Hum Reprod 1996 11:895-899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. McLatchie LM, Fraser NJ, Main MJ, Wise A, Brown J, Thompson N, Solari R, Lee MG, Foord SM. RAMPs regulate the transport and ligand specificity of the calcitonin-receptor-like receptor. Nature 1998 393:333-339[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Wimalawansa SJ, Gunasekera RD, Zhang F. Isolation, purification, and characterization of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor. Peptides 1993 14:691-699[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Quirion R, Van Rossum D. Dumont Y, St-Pierre S, Fournier A. Characterization of CGRP1 and CGRP2 receptor subtypes. [Review; 42 refs]. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1992 657:88-105[Medline]
  15. Poyner DR, Taylor GM, Tomlinson AE, Richardson AG, Smith DM. Characterization of receptors for calcitonin gene-related peptide and adrenomedullin on the guinea-pig vas deferens. Br J Pharmacol 1999 126:1276-1282[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Rorabaugh BR, Scofield MA, Smith DD, Jeffries WB, Abel PW. Functional calcitonin gene-related peptide subtype 2 receptors in porcine coronary arteries are identified as calcitonin gene-related peptide subtype 1 receptors by radioligand binding and reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001 299:1086-1094[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Tomlinson AE, Poyner DR. Multiple receptors for calcitonin gene- related peptide and amylin on guinea-pig ileum and vas deferens. Br J Pharmacol 1996 117:1362-1368[Medline]
  18. Yallampalli C. Chauhan M, Thota CS, Kondapaka SB, Wimalawansa SJ. Calcitonin gene-related peptide in pregnancy and its emerging receptor heterogeneity. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2002 13:263-269[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Chauhan M, Thota CS, Kondapaka S, Wimalawansa SJ, Yallampalli C. Evidence for the existence of a new receptor for CGRP, which is not CRLR. Peptides 2003 24:65-71[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Morara S, Wimalawansa SJ, Rosina A. Monoclonal antibodies reveal expression of the CGRP receptor in Purkinje cells, interneurons and astrocytes of rat cerebellar cortex. Neuroreport 1998 9:3755-3759[Medline]
  21. Wimalawansa SJ, El-Kholy AA. Comparative study of distribution and biochemical characterization of brain calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors in five different species. Neurosci 1993 54:513-519[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Yallampalli C, Gangula PRR, Kondapaka S, Fang L, Wimalawansa SJ. Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors in the rat uterus during pregnancy, labor and by progesterone. Biol. Reprod 1999 61:1023-1030
  23. Gether U. Uncovering molecular mechanisms involved in activation of G protein-coupled receptors. Endocr Rev 2000 21:90-113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Foord SM, Wise A, Brown J, Main MJ, Fraser NJ. The N-terminus of RAMPs is a critical determinant of the glycosylation state and ligand binding of calcitonin receptor-like receptor. Biochem Soc Trans 1999 27:535-539[Medline]
  25. Fraser NJ, Wise A, Brown J, Linda M, McLatchie LM, Main JM, Foord SM. The amino terminus of receptor activity modifying proteins is a critical determinant of glycosylation state and ligand binding of calcitonin receptor like receptor. Mol Pharmacol 1999 55:1054-1059[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ji TH, Grossmann M, Ji I. G protein-coupled receptors. I. Diversity of receptor-ligand interactions. J Biol Chem 1998 273:17299-17302[Free Full Text]
  27. Wang Y, Bukoski RD. Use of acute phenolic denervation to show the neuronal dependence of Ca2+-induced relaxation of isolated arteries. Life Sci 1999 64:887-894[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Leuthauser K, Gujer R, Aldecoa A, McKinney RA, Muff R, Fischer JA, Born W. Receptor-activity-modifying protein 1 forms heterodimers with two G-protein-coupled receptors to define ligand recognition. Biochem 2000 351:347-351[CrossRef]
  29. Hilariet S, Foord SM, Marshall FH, Bouvier M. Protein-protein interaction and not glycosylation determines the binding selectivity of heterodimers between the calcitonin receptor-like receptor and the receptor activity-modifying proteins. J Biol Chem 2001 276:29575-29581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Flahaut M, Rossier BC, Firsov D. Respective roles of calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMP) in cell surface expression of CRLR/RAMP heterodimeric receptors. J Biol Chem 2002 277:14731-14737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Gangula PR, Thota CS, Wimalawansa SJ, Bukoski RD, Yallampalli C. Mechanisms involved in calcitonin gene-related peptide-induced relaxation in pregnant rat uterine artery. Biol Reprod 2003 69:1635-1641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Grewal M, Cuevas J, Chaudhuri G, Nathan L. Effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide on vascular resistance in rats: role of sex steroids. Am Physiol Soc 1999 276:H2063-H2068
  33. Fitzsimmons TJ, Zhao X, Wank SA. The extracellular domain of receptor activity-modifying protein 1 is sufficient for calcitonin receptor- like receptor function. J Biol Chem 2003 278:14313-14320[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. G. R. De Mey, R. Megens, and G. E. Fazzi
Functional Antagonism between Endogenous Neuropeptide Y and Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide in Mesenteric Resistance Arteries
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2008; 324(3): 930 - 937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
K.E. Green, C. Thota, G.D.V. Hankins, C. Yallampalli, and Y.-L. Dong
Calcitonin gene-related peptide stimulates human villous trophoblast cell differentiation in vitro
Mol. Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 12(7): 443 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
X. Zhang, K. E. Green, C. Yallampalli, and Y. L. Dong
Adrenomedullin Enhances Invasion by Trophoblast Cell Lines
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 619 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Y.-L. Dong, K. E. Green, S. Vegiragu, G. D. V. Hankins, E. Martin, M. Chauhan, C. Thota, and C. Yallampalli
Evidence for Decreased Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Receptors and Compromised Responsiveness to CGRP of Fetoplacental Vessels in Preeclamptic Pregnancies
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2336 - 2343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/6/1658    most recent
biolreprod.103.023895v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chauhan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chauhan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chauhan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS