Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 18, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.026484
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/1/45    most recent
biolreprod.103.026484v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hickey, T.E.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hickey, T.E.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hickey, T.E.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.T.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 71, 45–52 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.026484
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Ovary

Interactions Between Androgen and Growth Factors in Granulosa Cell Subtypes of Porcine Antral Follicles1

T.E. Hickey2, D.L. Marrocco, R.B. Gilchrist, R.J. Norman, and D.T. Armstrong

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reproductive Medicine Unit, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Androgens acting via the androgen receptor (AR) have been implicated in regulation of folliculogenesis in many animal species. These effects are possibly mediated via enhancement of FSH and/or insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I activity in granulosa cells, which contain high levels of AR protein. We examined the in vitro effect of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) on DNA synthesis and progesterone secretion by follicular cells in response to FSH and IGF-I, alone or in combination. Cells from separate pools of 1- to 3-mm and 3- to 5-mm antral follicles were aspirated from gilt ovaries and fractioned into mural granulosa cells (MGCs) and cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) for subsequent cell culture. Androgen alone or with any combination of mitogen had minimal effect on proliferative and no effect on steroidogenic responses of MGCs from 3- to 5-mm antral follicles. Conversely, in MGCs from 1- to 3-mm follicles, DHT significantly enhanced IFG-I-stimulated proliferation and had variable influence on progesterone secretion. The effects of DHT on proliferative responses of COCs were also dependent on follicle size: DHT significantly augmented either IGF-I-stimulated proliferation (1- to 3-mm follicles) or FSH-stimulated proliferation (3- to 5-mm follicles). However, the steroidogenic responses of all COCs were identical, whereby DHT significantly suppressed progesterone secretion, predominantly in the presence of FSH. Addition of an AR antagonist, hydroxyflutamide, generally reversed the proliferative responses invoked by DHT but not the steroidogenic responses. We conclude that androgen-receptor-mediated activity in granulosa cells of antral follicles is dependent on follicle size, is influenced by proximity of cells to the oocyte, and possibly involves both classic and nonclassic steroid mechanisms.

androgen receptor, cumulus cells, follicular development, granulosa cells, growth factors


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Androgens are the predominant steroids produced in early follicular development and are present at high concentrations in follicular fluid at all stages of follicular growth, although the ratio of androgens to estrogens changes as follicle growth advances and dominant follicles engage in aromatase activity [1]. Treatment effects observed with the nonaromatizable androgen 5-{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), both in vivo [2, 3] and in vitro [47], demonstrate that androgens have a direct influence on ovarian function. This influence is potentially mediated by the androgen receptor (AR), which has been detected in ovarian cells from all vertebrate species studied to date [817], suggesting a conserved receptor-mediated role for androgens in folliculogenesis. Within the ovary, granulosa cells generally display the strongest AR immunoreactivity and are exposed to the most potent AR agonists, testosterone and DHT. The latter are absorbed from the secretions of thecal cells or are internally produced through enzymatic conversion of androgen precursors [18]. Therefore, granulosa cells are considered to be the main location of AR-mediated activity in the follicle and are the focus of most studies in this area of investigation.

The AR-mediated role for androgens in folliculogenesis and its mechanism of action are still being characterized. Nonhuman primates [19] and women [20, 21] exposed to high serum androgens develop large ovaries with increased numbers of antral follicles. Both testosterone and DHT promote in vitro follicle growth in mice [22, 23] and DHT treatment enhances ovulation rate in pigs [24]. Many of the differentiative actions of FSH on granulosa cells are augmented by AR agonists and include cholesterol metabolism, progesterone secretion, expression of steroidogenic enzymes, and induction of aromatase activity (reviewed in [25]). The mechanism involves modulation of cAMP within granulosa cells at both pre- and post-cAMP sites [25] and presumably involves the regulation of androgen-responsive genes. Although definitive proof of direct AR transcriptional regulation is still lacking, the FSH receptor (FSHR) may be one such ovarian target gene [24, 26, 27]. However, androgens may also act via other systems that impact on FSH activity. In addition to FSHR, androgen treatment also enhances insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 and IGF receptor mRNA expression in granulosa cells [28] and oocytes [29] of rhesus monkeys. Enhancement of FSH-mediated activity by IGF-I is well documented and also occurs at both pre- and post-cAMP sites [30, 31]. However, the effect of androgens on IGF-I mediated activity, alone or in combination with FSH, has not been explored in cultured granulosa cells.

In the current study, we have used a prepubertal pig model to study the effects of androgen on granulosa cell responses to FSH and IGF-I. As the interaction of these two mitogens changes in the presence of oocyte-secreted factors [32], we included in our investigation the two subpopulations of granulosa cells that emerge upon antrum formation in the follicle: mural granulosa cells (MGCs) that comprise the follicle wall and cumulus cells, which are intimately connected to the oocyte via gap junctions forming a cumulus-oocyte complex (COC). These two granulosa cell subtypes are anatomically and functionally distinct (reviewed by Eppig et al. [33]) due to varying proximities to the oocyte and the vascularized thecal layer. Both subtypes display strong immunological reactivity for AR in pigs [34]. We anticipated differential androgen responses between these two granulosa cell subtypes and we report, to our knowledge, for the first time, that proximity of the oocyte corresponds to increased androgenic activity that manifests as altered granulosa cell responses to mitogenic stimulation.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Collection of Follicular Cells

Unless otherwise noted, all chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Prepubertal pig ovaries were collected from a local abattoir and transported to the laboratory in warm saline supplemented with penicillin G (100 U/ml) and streptomycin sulphate (100 mg/ml). Time from ovary excision to follicle aspiration was approximately 1–2 h. Follicular cells were aspirated from antral follicles using a Precision Glide needle (0.9 mm x 25 mm) inserted in a 10-ml Vacutainer tube (both from Becton Dickinson, Meylan, France) under vacuum; ovaries with corpora lutea and follicles that were opaque or hemorrhagic were excluded. Follicular aspirates were kept at 37°C and allowed to sediment for 5 min. The sediment was transferred to nontreated Petri dishes containing warm 25 mM HEPES-buffered tissue culture medium-199 (H-TCM; ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) supplemented with 2 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U/ml penicillin G, streptomycin sulphate (100 mg/ml), and polyvinyl alcohol (0.3 mg/ ml). With the aid of a dissecting microscope, all naked oocytes and COCs were removed from the aspirates and placed into fresh H-TCM (as described above). From these, COCs with good structural integrity were further selected and manually washed twice in H-TCM and twice in bicarbonate-buffered TCM-199 (B-TCM, supplemented as per H-TCM; ICN) before culturing. Debris was removed from the remaining aspirate, which was then collected into a centrifuge tube and allowed to sediment by unit gravity for 1 min. This sediment contained large aggregates of mural granulosa cells (MGCs) and was discarded. The remaining aspirate was allowed to sediment a further 30 min, creating a pellet of aggregated MGCs of a more uniform size range. The supernatant, containing mostly single cells, was discarded and the pellet was washed twice in H-TCM and twice in B-TCM, with centrifugation between washes. An aliquot of resuspended cells was manually dissociated using a 1-ml syringe with a 23-gauge needle and counted with a hemocytometer to determine cell density.

Follicle Cell Culture

Mural granulosa cells were cultured as aggregates in 96-well flat-bottom plates (Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ) at a density of 106 cells/ml in a culture volume of 250 µl. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (10/well) were cultured in 96-well round-bottom plates (Falcon) in a culture volume of 125 µl. Culture conditions were serum-free B-TCM, supplemented as above, with combinations of the following hormone treatments: 50 mIU/ml recombinant human FSH (rhFSH; Puregon, N.V. Organon, Oss, Netherlands), 50 ng/ml recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I; Gropep, Adelaide, Australia), 0.5 µM DHT (Sigma), and 5 µM hydroxyflutamide (OHF; Sigma). Cells were cultured with treatments in an atmosphere of 38.5°C, 96% humidity, 5% CO2 in air for 18 h followed by a 6-h pulse of 0.8 µCi tritiated thymidine ([H3]-thymidine; ICN) in the same conditions. At 24 h, a fraction of the culture media was removed and frozen (–20°C) for steroid analysis, and plates were kept at 4°C until cell harvest.

Effects of Androgens on Proliferative and Steroidogenic Responses to FSH and IGF-I in MGCs and COCs

To test the responses of MGCs and COCs to an AR agonist, we used the nonaromatizable DHT at 0.5 µM, a concentration that approximates the level of this steroid in follicular fluid. In separate experiments, cells were obtained from either 3- to 5-mm or 1- to 3-mm antral follicles. Cell numbers were not restrictive for MGCs and all treatments were done on one plate in triplicate or quadruplicate, repeated in five experiments. As COCs were limited in number, smaller treatment groups were employed with 2–4 duplicates per treatment. Each experimental condition was repeated in a minimum of 4 experiments.

Effects of Androgen Receptor Antagonist on Proliferative and Steroidogenic Responses of MGCs and COCs to FSH, IGF-I, and Androgens

Because most steroids, including DHT, have documented nongenomic effects that are independent of their cognate receptor [35], the androgen receptor antagonist, OHF, was used to test the specificity of the observed androgen responses. MGCs or COCs were cultured under conditions selected on the basis of significant androgen effects that were observed in the above experiments. Hydroxyflutamide was employed at 5 µM, a 10-fold excess above that of DHT. Each experiment was repeated a minimum of four times with triplicate or quadruplicate treatments in MGCs and 2– 3 duplicate treatments in COCs.

Time-Course of Proliferative Responses to FSH, IGF-I, and Androgens

MGCs from 1- to 3-mm antral follicles were cultured as described above, but for each experiment, four separate culture plates were established, corresponding to 6-hourly termination points. Tritiated thymidine was added to cultures 6 h before termination of culture for each time point. The experiment was repeated three times with 3–6 duplicated treatments per plate.

Measurement of DNA Synthesis and Progesterone Secretion

Following culture, a fraction of media was removed and assayed for progesterone using an RIA kit (Diagnostic System Laboratories, Webster, TX) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The kit has a sensitivity of 0.25 pmol/ml, an intraassay coefficient of 8.4%, and an interassay coefficient of 12%. Incorporation of [3H]-thymidine (ICN) was measured in cells as an indication of the degree of cellular DNA synthesis and potential proliferation. Cells were harvested onto a filter mat using a Tomtec Harvester 96 (Tomtec, Hamden, CT), which removes unincorporated isotope in the process. Filter mats were then saturated with scintillation fluid, and emission of beta particles by [3H]-thymidine was detected with a Wallac microbeta counter (Fisions, Leies, UK). In independent experiments, incorporation of [3H]-thymidine into DNA was confirmed using methods similar to those described by Yong et al. (data not shown) [36].

Data Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) using three-way ANOVAs on the log response of raw data, with blocking on experiment. Where significant effects were seen, post hoc t-tests were used for comparison of adjusted means for those significant effects. For clarity of presentation, raw data were converted to relative data for each replicate experiment, in which the mean value for the control treatment with no hormone was designated as 1. Graphs therefore represent the mean values (±SEM) of the summation of relative data for a group of replicate experiments. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, except where otherwise noted.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Significant interaction between FSH and IGF-I occurred within all experiments where both mitogens were present, confirming previous observations [37, 38]. Because the focus of our study was the interaction between DHT and these factors, we report herein the statistical results relevant to these interactions for sake of brevity and simplicity of presentation.

Effects of Androgen on Proliferative and Steroidogenic Responses of MGCs and COCs to FSH and IGF-I

Three- to five-millimeter antral follicles Figure 1 summarizes the effects of FSH, IGF-I, and DHT alone and in combinations on DNA synthesis and progesterone secretion in MGCs and COCs from 3- to 5-mm antral follicles. Both FSH and IGF-I significantly increased DNA synthesis in MGCs, and the responses to these agents in combination were approximately additive (Fig. 1A). Similarly, both FSH and IGF-I stimulated progesterone secretion in MGCs, with the effect of FSH considerably greater than that of IGF-I. The effect of combined treatment with FSH plus IGF-I on progesterone secretion was a greater than additive response that tended toward synergism (Fig. 1C).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Effect of DHT on DNA synthesis and progesterone secretion in gilt MGCs (A, C) and COCs (B, D) from 3- to 5-mm antral follicles. Cells were cultured for 24 h in serum-free media with combinations of rhFSH (50 mIU/ml), rhIGF-I (50 ng/ml), and DHT (0.5 µM). Graphs represent data expressed as relative means (± SEM) to the control mean with no hormone, which was set at a value of 1. Raw data for control values ± SEM were as follows: (A) 536 ± 41 cpm; (B) 927 ± 131 cpm; (C) 3.7 ± 0.3 nmol/L, and (D) 0.9 ± 0.0 nmol/L. DHT significantly enhanced DNA synthesis in both cell types (three-way ANOVA main effects: (A) P = 0.04 and (B) P < 0.0001). Progesterone secretion was unaffected by DHT in MGCs (C), and suppressed by DHT in COCs (D) (three-way ANOVA main effect: P < 0.0001). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.0001 as compared with equivalent treatment with no DHT

Proliferative effects of FSH and IGF-I were also seen in COCs (Fig. 1B), although the magnitudes of stimulation by both agents were considerably greater than observed in MGCs, and the response to IGF-I was substantially greater (20-fold stimulation) than the response to FSH (8-fold stimulation). A more striking difference between the two granulosa cell subtypes was seen in response to combined treatment with FSH and IGF-I, in which FSH completely obliterated the proliferative response to IGF-I. The pattern of steroidogenic responses of COCs to FSH and IGF-I alone and in combination were similar to those observed in the MGCs, although the magnitude of progesterone secretion was considerably less in the COCs.

The nonaromatizable androgen, DHT, had a significant main effect on DNA synthesis in MGCs (three-way ANOVA; P = 0.04) but there were no significant interactions between androgen and FSH or IGF-I. Progesterone secretion in MGCs was globally unaffected by DHT (Fig. 1C). To exclude the possibility of an inappropriate dose of androgen, the same treatments were repeated in combination with a range of DHT concentrations from 1 nM to 1 µM, with no significant effect on FSH and/or IFG-1-stimulated DNA synthesis or progesterone secretion (data not shown). In COCs, the three-way interaction of FSH, IGF-I, and DHT was close to significance (P = 0.06), and post hoc tests assuming significance at this level show augmentation of FSH-stimulated proliferation by DHT (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, although DHT did not alter proliferative responses of COCs to IGF-I alone, in the presence of both mitogens, DHT reverses to a small but significant degree (P = 0.02) the inhibitory effect of FSH on IGF-I-stimulated proliferation. The steroidogenic response of COCs to FSH was inhibited 2-fold by DHT (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1D), independent of the presence of IGF-I. Progesterone secretion from COCs under control conditions and DHT alone was undetectable and therefore arbitrarily given the value of the lowest assay standard in the graph.

One- to three-millimeter antral follicles Figure 2 summarizes the effects of FSH, IGF-I, and DHT alone and in combinations on DNA synthesis and progesterone secretion in MGCs and COCs from 1- to 3-mm follicles. The pattern and degree of mitogen-stimulated DNA synthesis in MGCs from these follicles (Fig. 2A) differed from that seen in MGCs from follicles 3–5 mm in diameter (Fig. 1A). The relative degree of FSH stimulation above control values was approximately 10-fold in small follicles compared with approximately 2-fold in the larger ones, resulting in a 6-fold higher uptake of [3H]-thymidine in cells from smaller follicles. While in relative terms, IGF-I alone was a less potent mitogen than FSH in cells from small follicles, in terms of total uptake of [3H]-thymidine, IGF-I induced similar effects in cells from both follicle sizes. Another consistent feature of responses of MGCs from both follicle sizes was the enhanced effect of combined mitogen over either mitogen alone, although this effect was approximately 20-fold in small follicles as compared with approximately 4-fold in larger follicles due to the greater mitogenicity of FSH in the former. Progesterone secretion from MGCs of 1- to 3-mm follicles (Fig. 2C) also followed similar patterns of response to FSH and IGF-I as observed in MGCs from 3- to 5-mm follicles, although cells from smaller follicles secreted a greater amount than cells from larger follicles under all conditions.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Effect of DHT on DNA synthesis and progesterone secretion in gilt MGCs (A, C) and COCs (B, D) from 1- to 3-mm antral follicles. Cells were cultured for 24 h in serum-free media with combinations of rhFSH (50 mIU/ml), rhIGF-I (50 ng/ml), and DHT (0.5 µM). Graphs represent data expressed as relative means (± SEM) to the control mean with no hormone, which was set at a value of 1. Raw data for control values ± SEM were as follows: (A) 749 ± 168 cpm, (B) 473 ± 51 cpm, (C) 13.8 ± 0.5 nmol/L, and (D) 0.09 ± 0.0 nmol/L. DHT enhanced proliferation and suppressed progesterone secretion in both cell types (three-way ANOVA main effects: (A) P < 0.001) and (B through D) P < 0.0001). * P < 0.005; and ** P < 0.0001 as compared with equivalent treatment with no DHT

The effects of DHT were more ubiquitous in MGCs from 1- to 3-mm follicles as compared with MGCs from 3- to 5-mm follicles; there was a highly significant main effect of DHT on both DNA synthesis (three-way ANOVA; P < 0.001) and progesterone secretion (three-way ANOVA; P < 0.0001) in cells from the smaller follicles. In terms of DNA synthesis, there was also a trend toward a three-way interaction between DHT, FSH, and IGF-I (P = 0.08) in MGCs from smaller follicles that was not apparent in MGCs from larger follicles. Post hoc tests assuming this interaction was significant show an enhancement of IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis by DHT (P = 0.0003) (Fig. 2A). The effects of DHT on steroidogenic responses of MGCs from 1- to 3-mm follicles were inconsistent: in some assays, DHT inhibited FSH-stimulated progesterone secretion and in others it did not, leading to comparisons that were not statistically significant (Fig. 2C). However, the main effect of DHT on progesterone secretion in cells from smaller follicles was highly significant (three-way ANOVA; P < 0.0001).

Mitogen-stimulated DNA synthesis (Fig. 2B) and progesterone secretion (Fig. 2D) characteristic of COCs from 1- to 3-mm follicles followed similar patterns of stimulation as observed in COCs from larger follicles (Fig. 1, B and D). In terms of DNA synthesis, baseline values for control and FSH-stimulated COCs were approximately 2-fold greater in COCs from 3- to 5-mm follicles, but the amount of progesterone secretion was nearly identical between COCs of both follicle sizes. Stimulation by IGF-I and combined mitogen was also remarkably similar in relative and absolute terms between COCs from both follicle sizes in assessment of both DNA synthesis and progesterone secretion.

In COCs from 1- to 3-mm follicles, there was a significant three-way interaction between DHT, FSH, and IGF-I (P = 0.05) in stimulating DNA synthesis, whereby DHT augmented IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis to approximately 50-fold over controls (P < 0.0001; Fig. 2B). This feature was absent in COCs from 3- to 5-mm follicles, where the androgen effect was only evident in the presence of FSH. Dihydrotestosterone also significantly enhanced FSH-stimulated DNA synthesis in COCs from 1- to 3-mm follicles (P < 0.01) and tended to increase DNA synthesis on its own (P = 0.07) (Fig. 2B). In addition, as observed in COCs from 3- to 5-mm follicles, DHT inhibited progesterone secretion by approximately 2-fold in the presence of FSH, independent of the presence of IGF-I in COCs from 1- to 3-mm follicles (P < 0.0001; Fig. 2D).

Effect of an Androgen Receptor Antagonist, Hydroxyflutamide, on Granulosa Cell Responses to DHT

The AR antagonist OHF was able to abolish the stimulatory effects of DHT on both FSH-stimulated DNA synthesis in COCs from 3- to 5-mm follicles (Fig. 3A) and IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis in COCs from 1- to 3-mm follicles (Fig. 4B). However, DHT and OHF had significant two-way interactions with IGF-I (P = 0.05 and P = 0.001, respectively), independently stimulating DNA synthesis in MGC from 1- to 3-mm follicles and having a greater effect when combined than either alone (Fig. 4A). Likewise, OHF had agonistic effects similar to DHT in the inhibition of FSH-stimulated progesterone secretion in COCs from 3- to 5-mm follicles (Fig. 3B; two significant two-way interactions: FSH x DHT, P = 0.02; FSH x OHF, P = 0.001) and was more potent than DHT in suppressing progesterone secretion in the absence of FSH (significant two-way interaction between DHT x OHF, P < 0.001). As COCs from small antral follicles do not secrete measurable quantities of progesterone under control or IGF-I conditions, the effects of OHF were not examined.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Effect of an AR antagonist, hydroxyflutamide (OHF), on DNA synthesis (A) and progesterone secretion (B) in gilt COCs from 3- to 5-mm antral follicles. Cells were cultured for 24 h in serum-free media with combinations of rhFSH (50 mIU/ml), DHT (0.5 µM), and OHF (5 µM). Graphs represent data expressed as relative means (± SEM) to the control mean with no hormone, which was set at a value of 1. Refer to Results for statistical comparisons



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Effect of an AR antagonist, hydroxyflutamide (OHF), on DNA synthesis in gilt MGCs (A) and COCs (B) from 1- to 3-mm antral follicles. Cells were cultured for 24 h in serum-free media with combinations of rhIGF-I (50 ng/ml), DHT (0.5 µM), and OHF (5 µM). Graphs represent data expressed as relative means (± SEM) to the control mean with no hormone, which was set at a value of 1. Refer to Results for statistical comparisons

Time-Course of Proliferative Responses of MGC to FSH, IGF-I, and Androgens

Six-hourly time points were used to observe the progressive effects of mitogens and androgens on DNA synthesis in MGC from small antral follicles over a 24-h period (Table 1). Under control conditions, MGCs dramatically lost their ability to incorporate [3H]-thymidine after 6 h in culture, exhibiting a 50-fold decrease in uptake by 24 h. As expected, addition of FSH and IGF-I, alone or in combination, maintained a higher level of [3H]-thymidine incorporation in these cells as compared with control conditions at each time point. Interestingly, at both 6 and 12 h, MGCs exhibited a response to mitogen that is similar to that exhibited by COCs, whereby IGF-I was a more potent stimulus than FSH, and FSH tended to inhibit IGF-I stimulation when both mitogens were present (P < 0.001 in all instances). During this first half of the culture period, DHT had no effect on [3H]-thymidine incorporation under any condition. The second 12-h culture period was distinct from the first 12-h period in three ways: 1) the mitogenic effect of FSH exceeded the effect of IGF-I at both 18 (P < 0.001) and 24 h (P < 0.0001); 2) the two mitogens combined had an additive effect larger than each mitogen alone, and 3) responses to DHT emerged (significant three-way interaction between DHT, FSH, and IGF-I, P < 0.05 at both 18 and 24 h). The effect of DHT was most notable in combination with IGF-I. At 18 h, DHT was able to enhance the mitogenic stimulation of IGF-I, and at 24 h, there was a two-fold increase in [3H]-thymidine incorporation over IGF-I alone (P < 0.0001 in both instances). In this series of experiments, DHT also tended to enhance FSH-stimulated DNA synthesis (P = 0.06).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Effect of hormone treatment over time on [3H]-thymidine uptake in gilt mural granulosa cells from 1- to 3-mm follicles.*


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Androgens influence ovarian function in two ways: 1) as metabolic precursors for estrogen synthesis and 2) as ligands for androgen receptors. The latter represents direct androgen activity and its role in folliculogenesis remains obscure. We have explored the effect of the most potent AR agonist, DHT, alone or in combination with the follicular growth factors FSH and IGF-I, on granulosa cell proliferation and differentiation in 24-h cultures of porcine granulosa cells from prepubertal gilts. Furthermore, we examined these cells in varying spatial and morphological proximity to oocytes, represented in terms of follicle size and structural attachment. In general, we observed that DHT stimulated proliferation and inhibited progesterone secretion, dependent on follicle size, presence of another growth factor, and proximity to the oocyte. These androgenic influences appeared to be complex and indicative of pathways involving both classic and nonclassic steroid action.

Alone, DHT exerted a main effect on proliferation in both granulosa cell subtypes from both follicle sizes; however, this effect was strongest in granulosa cells from 1- to 3-mm follicles, particularly in those cells complexed to the oocyte. Although we did not examine preantral granulosa cells in this study, these cells have intense expression of AR protein in most species, including the pig [39], and it is feasible that androgen effects on proliferation could be stronger in preantral cells. Cultured preantral mouse follicles respond directly to androgens by increasing follicle diameter and DNA synthesis [23]. However, previous to our study, a direct in vitro effect of androgen alone on proliferation of granulosa cells had not been demonstrated for nonmurine species, although the presence of AR has been positively associated with the cell-cycle-related nuclear antigen Ki-67 [40].

Stimulatory effects of androgen on the proliferation of granulosa cells were most pronounced in the presence of a singular mitogen, and the specificity of that mitogen was determined by follicle size. Thus, in granulosa cells from small antral follicles, DHT had the most significant and consistent effect in the presence of IGF-I, whereas in granulosa cells from medium-sized antral follicles, this effect was lacking, and androgen either had no effect (MGCs) or enhanced FSH-stimulated mitogenesis in the presence of the oocyte (COCs). Androgen also induced a small increase in FSH-stimulated proliferation in MGC from small antral follicles, an effect preceded in a time course trial by enhancement of IGF-I-stimulated mitogenesis. Studies by Vendola et al. using androgen-treated monkeys as a model show marked increases in mRNA for IGF-I and IGF receptor [28, 29], and FSHR [19] in similar-sized follicles. Our data support the hypothesis introduced by these authors that androgens may be acting in part through mediation of IGF-I activity, at least in small antral follicles. Whether this occurs through induction of FSHR and is responsible for the effect of androgen on FSH-mediated mitogenesis remains to be determined. However, enhancement of IGF-I activity could potentially explain the effect of DHT alone on proliferation of granulosa cells in our study and of androgens on in vitro mouse follicle growth [22, 23].

Numerous studies have demonstrated the enhancement of differentiative actions of FSH by androgens, but few have examined their effect on the mitogenic capacity of this gonadotrophin. Bley et al. [41] demonstrated enhanced FSH-stimulated DNA synthesis by DHT under serum-free conditions in cultured rat granulosa cells, but only after 48 h. At 24 h, the steroid had no effect, consistent with our data for MGC from 3- to 5-mm antral follicles. However, we observed this mitogenic response in COCs from the same follicles, coincident with a suppression of FSH-stimulated progesterone secretion that was not observed in the MGCs. Only MGCs from small antral follicles, that may not have fully differentiated from the more primitive preantral granulosa cells, exhibited responses to DHT that were similar to those observed in COCs. An inverse relationship between proliferation and progesterone secretion has been widely demonstrated in granulosa cells, whereby factors that stimulate one activity also suppress the other [32, 38]. This pertains to androgens, which have been shown to suppress granulosa cell DNA synthesis [42, 43] and enhance granulosa cell steroidogenesis [5, 44], the opposite to our current findings. In the earlier studies, granulosa cells were cultured under conditions that promote a more luteinized granulosa cell phenotype. Collectively, these observations suggest that the differentiative differences incurred on granulosa cells by oocyte-secreted factor(s) influence the ability of androgens to alter both the mitogenic and steroidogenic actions of FSH and IGF-I in antral follicles. Current research in our laboratory, in which denuded oocytes are cocultured with MGCs, is aimed at further characterizing this phenomenon [45].

One means by which oocytes may affect androgenic responses is via regulation of AR expression. It has been demonstrated in rats [46], pigs [39], and monkeys [40, 47] that MGC from small follicles possess more AR protein and mRNA than larger follicles. Hillier et al. [25] suggest that this reduction in AR is necessary for the transition to preovulatory growth, a suggestion further supported by recent data from Cheng et al. [48] in which high expression of AR in the granulosa cells of ERß-deficient mice was observed together with a block in progressive antral follicle growth. Our data provide evidence that one physiological consequence of a reduction in AR expression in MGCs is loss of the ability of androgen to stimulate DNA synthesis and suppress progesterone secretion. Furthermore, our results are in accordance with those of Garrett and Guthrie [39], that these events occur when antral follicles reach 3 mm in diameter in the pig. Although quantitative comparisons of the expression of AR between cumulus and mural granulosa cells are lacking, two studies anecdotally observe that AR expression diminishes in a centripetal fashion toward the oocyte in rats [46] and pigs [34]. We demonstrate that androgens continue to enhance FSH-stimulated mitogenesis and suppress FSH-stimulated progesterone secretion in COCs from 3- to 5-mm follicles, suggesting that modulation of androgen activity by the oocyte may be a means of maintaining a distinct phenotype.

When studying androgen activity, it is common to use DHT as a ligand, the activity of which is implicitly linked with the AR, and effects induced by this androgen are generally presumed to follow classic genomic steroid receptor pathways involving modulation of the transcriptional activity of target genes. Using the AR antagonist hydroxyflutamide (OHF), we found that enhancement of mitogen-stimulated proliferation by DHT generally followed a pattern of classic steroid activity but suppression of FSH-stimulated progesterone secretion by DHT and OHF was indicative of nonclassic steroid activity. Antiandrogens have been shown to inhibit steroidogenic enzyme activity in rat testicular tissue [49] and to have a differential effect on FSH- and cAMP-induced steroidogenesis in rat granulosa cells [44]. The ability of OHF to antagonize certain androgenic effects but agonize others may be due to its unique interaction with the AR: it can bind the AR and induce a conformational change that can have androgenic effects on cytoplasmic signal transduction pathways [50] but is unable to induce the conformational change necessary for DNA binding and gene regulation [51]. The finding that OHF can be agonistic in the presence of DHT and IGF-I in stimulating proliferation of MGCs from small follicle, but antagonistic to proliferation under the same conditions in cumulus granulosa cells from the same follicles is difficult to explain, but again highlights the influence of the oocyte. Zhu et al. [50] have reported differential effects of OHF on proliferation of human breast cancer cells and provide evidence that both genomic and nongenomic mechanisms are involved. Our data suggests that AR-mediated influences on steroidogenesis and mitogenesis in granulosa cells are more complex than the regulation of gene transcription, although the specific mechanisms at play remain unresolved.

In summary, we demonstrate that androgens mainly enhance mitogen-stimulated proliferation and suppress FSH-induced differentiation in immature granulosa cells of the pig and that this activity is promoted by proximity to the oocyte. As the antrum enlarges and two granulosa cell subtypes become established, differential androgen activity emerges whereby those cells more distant from the oocyte become less responsive to androgen. This change in androgen activity appears to correlate with a reduction in AR expression and subsequent luteinization of the granulosa cells. Androgenic activity in immature granulosa cells is complex and possibly mediated by classic and nonclassic steroid mechanisms; both appear to be influenced by the oocyte. Our data add to the growing compendium of evidence that the oocyte orchestrates developmental events in folliculogenesis. We suggest that control of androgenic activity can be added to its repertoire and may be one means by which the oocyte abrogates differentiation of granulosa cells toward a luteinized phenotype.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors would like to acknowledge Samantha Scott for technical assistance, Clyde Milner for assistance in formatting the manuscript, and Justin Lokhorst (Department of Public Health, University of Adelaide) for performing the statistical analyses.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Australian Research Council, and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Back

2 Correspondence: Theresa E. Hickey, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 1st Floor Maternity Building, Woodville Road, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia. FAX: 61 8 8222 7521; theresa.hickey{at}adelaide.edu.au Back

Received: 12 December 2003.

First decision: 22 December 2003.

Accepted: 13 February 2004.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. McNatty KP, Makris A, Reinhold VN, De Grazia C, Osathanondh R, Ryan KJ. Metabolism of androstenedione by human ovarian tissues in vitro with particular reference to reductase and aromatase activity. Steroids 1979 34:429-443[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Louvet JP, Harman SM, Schrieber JR, Ross GT. Evidence of a role of androgens in follicular maturation. Endocrinology 1975 97:366-372[Abstract]
  3. Nandedkar TD. Is dihydrotestosterone a cause of follicular atresia?. Med Hypotheses 1981 7:801-808[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Rao CV. Steroid hormone modulation of 3H-prostaglanding E1 binding to bovine corpus luteum cell membranes. Prostaglandins 1975 9:569-578[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Armstrong DT, Dorrington JH. Androgens augment FSH-induced progesterone secretion by cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1976 99:1411-1414[Abstract]
  6. Daniel SA, Armstrong DT. Enhancement of follicle-stimulating hormone-induced aromatase activity by androgens in cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1980 107:1027-1033[Medline]
  7. Hillier SG, De Zwart FA. Evidence that granulosa cell aromatase induction/activation by follicle-stimulating hormone is an androgen receptor-regulated process in vitro. Endocrinology 1981 109:1303-1305[Abstract]
  8. Ito A, Sato W, Mori Y. Identification and partial characterization of the cytoplasmic androgen receptor in bovine ovarian capsule. J Steroid Biochem 1985 23:27-31[Medline]
  9. Hild-Petito S, West NB, Brenner RM, Stouffer RL. Localization of androgen receptor in the follicle and corpus luteum of the primate ovary during the menstrual cycle. Biol Reprod 1991 44:561-568[Abstract]
  10. Horie K, Takakura K, Fujiwara H, Suginami H, Liao S, Mori T. Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptor in the human ovary throughout the menstrual cycle in relation to oestrogen and progesterone receptor expression. Hum Reprod 1992 7:184-190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Yoshimura Y, Chang C, Okamoto T, Tamura T. Immunolocalization of androgen receptor in the small, preovulatory, and postovulatory follicles of laying hens. Gen Comp Endocrinol 1993 91:81-89[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Hirai M, Hirata S, Osada T, Hagihara K, Kato J. Androgen receptor mRNA in the rat ovary and uterus. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1994 49:1-7[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Sperry TS, Thomas P. Characterization of two nuclear androgen receptors in Atlantic croaker: comparison of their biochemical properties and binding specificities. Endocrinology 1999 140:1602-1611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Touhata K, Kinoshita M, Tokuda Y, Toyohara H, Sakaguchi M, Yokoyama Y, Yamashita S. Sequence and expression of a cDNA encoding the red seabream androgen receptor. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999 1450:481-485[Medline]
  15. Slomczynska M, Duda M, Slzak K. The expression of androgen receptor, cytochrome P450 aromatase and FSH receptor mRNA in the porcine ovary. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2001 39:9-13
  16. Lutz LB, Cole LM, Gupta MK, Kwist KW, Auchus RJ, Hammes SR. Evidence that androgens are the primary steroids produced by Xenopus laevis ovaries and may signal through the classical androgen receptor to promote oocyte maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 98:13728-13733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Vermeirsch H, Simoens P, Coryn M, Van den Broeck W. Immunolocalization of androgen receptors in the canine ovary and their relation to sex steroid hormone concentrations. Reproduction 2001 122:711-721[Abstract]
  18. McNatty KP, Makris A, DeGrazia C, Osathanondh R, Ryan KJ. The production of progesterone, androgens, and estrogens by granulosa cells, thecal tissue, and stromal tissue from human ovaries in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1979 49:687-699[Abstract]
  19. Vendola KA, Zhou J, Adesanya OO, Weil SJ, Bondy CA. Androgens stimulate early stages of follicular growth in the primate ovary. J Clin Invest 1998 101:2622-2629[Medline]
  20. Chadha S, Pache TD, Huikeshoven JM, Brinkmann AO, van der Kwast TH. Androgen receptor expression in human ovarian and uterine tissue of long-term androgen-treated transsexual women. Hum Pathol 1994 25:1198-1204[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Balen AH, Conway GS, Kaltsas G, Techatrasak K, Manning PJ, West C, Jacobs HS. Polycystic ovary syndrome: the spectrum of the disorder in 1741 patients. Hum Reprod 1995 10:2107-2111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Murray AA, Gosden RG, Allison V, Spears N. Effect of androgens on the development of mouse follicles growing in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1998 113:27-33[Abstract]
  23. Wang H, Andoh K, Hagiwara H, Xiaowei L, Kikuchi N, Abe Y, Yamada K, Fatima R, Mizunuma H. Effect of adrenal and ovarian androgens on type 4 follicles unresponsive to FSH in immature mice. Endocrinology 2001 142:4930-4936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Cardenas H, Herrick JR, Pope WF. Increased ovulation rate in gilts treated with dihydrotestosterone. Reproduction 2002 123:527-533[Abstract]
  25. Hillier SG, Tetsuka M. Role of androgens in follicle maturation and atresia. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1997 11:249-260[Medline]
  26. Daniel SA, Armstrong DT. Site of action of androgens on follicle-stimulating hormone-induced aromatase activity in cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1984 114:1975-1982[Abstract]
  27. Weil S, Vendola K, Zhou J, Bondy CA. Androgen and follicle-stimulating hormone interactions in primate ovarian follicle development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999 84:2951-2956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Vendola K, Zhou J, Wang J, Bondy CA. Androgens promote insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor-I receptor gene expression in the primate ovary. Hum Reprod 1999 14:2328-2332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Vendola K, Zhou J, Wang J, Famuyiwa OA, Bievre M, Bondy CA. Androgens promote oocyte insulin-like growth factor I expression and initiation of follicle development in the primate ovary. Biol Reprod 1999 61:353-357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Adashi EY, Resnick CE, D'Ercole AJ, Svoboda ME, Van Wyk JJ. Insulin-like growth factors as intraovarian regulators of granulosa cell growth and function. Endocr Rev 1985 6:400-420[Abstract]
  31. LaVoie HA, Garmey JC, Veldhuis JD. Mechanisms of insulin-like growth factor I augmentation of follicle-stimulating hormone-induced porcine steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene promoter activity in granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1999 140:146-153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Li R, Norman RJ, Armstrong DT, Gilchrist RB. Oocyte-secreted factor(s) determine functional differences between bovine mural granulosa cells and cumulus cells. Biol Reprod 2000 63:839-845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Eppig JJ, Chesnel F, Hirao Y, O'Brien MJ, Pendola FL, Watanabe S, Wigglesworth K. Oocyte control of granulosa cell development: how and why. Hum Reprod 1997 12:127-132[Abstract]
  34. Slomczynska M, Tabarowski Z. Localization of androgen receptor and cytochrome P450 aromatase in the follicle and corpus luteum of the porcine ovary. Anim Reprod Sci 2001 65:127-134[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Simoncini T, Genazzani AR. Non-genomic actions of sex steroid hormones. Eur J Endocrinol 2003 148:281-292[Abstract]
  36. Yong EL, Baird DT, Yates R, Reichert LE Jr, Hillier SG. Hormonal regulation of the growth and steroidogenic function of human granulosa cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992 74:842-849[Abstract]
  37. Xia P, Tekpetey FR, Armstrong DT. Effect of IGF-I on pig oocyte maturation, fertilization, and early embryonic development in vitro, and on granulosa and cumulus cell biosynthetic activity. Mol Reprod Dev 1994 38:373-379[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Armstrong DT, Xia P, de Gannes G, Tekpetey FR, Khamsi F. Differential effects of insulin-like growth factor-I and follicle-stimulating hormone on proliferation and differentiation of bovine cumulus cells and granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 1996 54:331-338[Abstract]
  39. Garrett WM, Guthrie HD. Expression of androgen receptors and steroidogenic enzymes in relation to follicular growth and atresia following ovulation in pigs. Biol Reprod 1996 55:949-955[Abstract]
  40. Weil SJ, Vendola K, Zhou J, Adesanya OO, Wang J, Okafor J, Bondy CA. Androgen receptor gene expression in the primate ovary: cellular localization, regulation, and functional correlations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998 83:2479-2485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Bley MA, Saragueta PE, Baranao JL. Concerted stimulation of rat granulosa cell deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis by sex steroids and follicle-stimulating hormone. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1997 62:11-19[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Ranson EJ, Picton HM, Hunter MG. Effects of testosterone and oestradiol on [3H]-thymidine incorporation by porcine granulosa and theca cells. Anim Reprod Sci 1997 47:229-236[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Pradeep PK, Li X, Peegel H, Menon KM. Dihydrotestosterone inhibits granulosa cell proliferation by decreasing the cyclin D2 mRNA expression and cell cycle arrest at G1 phase. Endocrinology 2002 143:2930-2935[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Hillier SG, de Zwart FA. Androgen/antiandrogen modulation of cyclic AMP-induced steroidogenesis during granulosa cell differentiation in tissue culture. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1982 28:347-361[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Armstrong DT, Marrocco DL, Hickey TE, Gilchrist RB. Oocyte-secreted factor(s) augment mitogenic responses of porcine granulosa cells to insulin-like growth factor-1 and 5-alpha-dihydrotestosterone. In: Program of the 86th annual meeting of The Endocrine Society; 2004; New Orleans, LA. (in press)
  46. Tetsuka M, Whitelaw PF, Bremner WJ, Millar MR, Smyth CD, Hillier SG. Developmental regulation of androgen receptor in rat ovary. J Endocrinol 1995 145:535-543[Abstract]
  47. Hillier SG, Tetsuka M, Fraser HM. Location and developmental regulation of androgen receptor in primate ovary. Hum Reprod 1997 12:107-111[Abstract]
  48. Cheng G, Weihua Z, Makinen S, Makela S, Saji S, Warner M, Gustafsson JA, Hovatta O. A role for the androgen receptor in follicular atresia of estrogen receptor beta knockout mouse ovary. Biol Reprod 2002 66:77-84[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Ayub M, Levell MJ. Inhibition of rat testicular 17 alpha-hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase activities by anti-androgens (flutamide, hydroxyflutamide, RU23908, cyproterone acetate) in vitro. J Steroid Biochem 1987 28:43-47[Medline]
  50. Zhu X, Li H, Liu JP, Funder JW. Androgen stimulates mitogen-activated protein kinase in human breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1999 152:199-206[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Kemppainen JA, Lane MV, Sar M, Wilson EM. Androgen receptor phosphorylation, turnover, nuclear transport, and transcriptional activation. Specificity for steroids and antihormones. J Biol Chem 1992 267:968-974[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K.A. Walters, C.M. Allan, and D.J. Handelsman
Androgen Actions and the Ovary
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2008; 78(3): 380 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. A. Walters, C. M. Allan, M. Jimenez, P. R. Lim, R. A. Davey, J. D. Zajac, P. Illingworth, and D. J. Handelsman
Female Mice Haploinsufficient for an Inactivated Androgen Receptor (AR) Exhibit Age-Dependent Defects That Resemble the AR Null Phenotype of Dysfunctional Late Follicle Development, Ovulation, and Fertility
Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 3674 - 3684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M.Y. Yang and J.E. Fortune
Testosterone Stimulates the Primary to Secondary Follicle Transition in Bovine Follicles In Vitro
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2006; 75(6): 924 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. C. Foong, D. H. Abbott, M. A. Zschunke, T. G. Lesnick, J. L. Phy, and D. A. Dumesic
Follicle Luteinization in Hyperandrogenic Follicles of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Gonadotropin Therapy for in Vitro Fertilization
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2327 - 2333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T.E. Hickey, D.L. Marrocco, F. Amato, L.J. Ritter, R.J. Norman, R.B. Gilchrist, and D.T. Armstrong
Androgens Augment the Mitogenic Effects of Oocyte-Secreted Factors and Growth Differentiation Factor 9 on Porcine Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 825 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/1/45    most recent
biolreprod.103.026484v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hickey, T.E.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hickey, T.E.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hickey, T.E.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS