Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print April 14, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.028803
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/2/548    most recent
biolreprod.104.028803v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guttman, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vogl, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guttman, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vogl, A. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Guttman, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vogl, A. W.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 71, 548–559 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.028803
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Testis

Evidence That Tubulobulbar Complexes in the Seminiferous Epithelium Are Involved with Internalization of Adhesion Junctions1

Julian A. Guttman3, Yoshimi Takai4, and A. Wayne Vogl2,3

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology,3 Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry,4 Osaka University Medical School, Osaka 565-0871, Japan


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tubulobulbar complexes may be part of the mechanism by which intercellular adhesion junctions are internalized by Sertoli cells during sperm release. These complexes develop in regions where Sertoli cells are attached to adjacent cells by intercellular adhesion junctions termed ectoplasmic specializations. At sites where Sertoli cells are attached to spermatid heads, tubulobulbar complexes consist of fingerlike processes of the spermatid plasma membrane, corresponding invaginations of the Sertoli cell plasma membrane, and a surrounding cuff of modified Sertoli cell cytoplasm. At the terminal ends of the complexes occur clusters of vesicles. Here we show that tubulobulbar complexes develop in regions previously occupied by ectoplasmic specializations and that the structures share similar molecular components. In addition, the adhesion molecules nectin 2 and nectin 3, found in the Sertoli cell and spermatid plasma membranes, respectively, are concentrated at the distal ends of tubulobulbar complexes. We also demonstrate that double membrane bounded vesicles are associated with the ends of tubulobulbar complexes and nectin 3 is present on spermatids, but is absent from spermatozoa released from the epithelium. These results are consistent with the conclusion that Sertoli cell and spermatid membrane adhesion domains are internalized together by tubulobulbar complexes. PKC{alpha}, a kinase associated with endocytosis of adhesion domains in other systems, is concentrated at tubulobulbar complexes, and antibodies to endosomal and lysosomal (LAMP1, SGP1) markers label the cluster of vesicles associated with the ends of tubulobulbar complexes. Our results are consistent with the conclusion that tubulobulbar complexes are involved with the disassembly of ectoplasmic specializations and with the internalization of intercellular membrane adhesion domains during sperm release.

Sertoli cells, spermatid, spermatogenesis, testis


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Turnover of unique actin-related intercellular adhesion junctions in the seminiferous epithelium of the testis is fundamental to fertility in men. These massive junctions, termed ectoplasmic specializations, occur near the base of the epithelium as part of the junction complex between adjacent Sertoli cells and in more apical regions between Sertoli cells and spermatids as the major form of intercellular attachment (Fig. 1). Disassembly of the basal junction complexes ahead of translocating preleptotene spermatocytes and the simultaneous assembly of similar complexes behind these cells allows the next generation of spermatogenic cells to move into the adluminal compartment of the seminiferous epithelium without compromising the integrity of the blood/testis barrier [1] (Fig. 1). In apical regions, assembly of ectoplasmic specializations is responsible for anchoring spermatids to Sertoli cells and disassembly of these junctions is part of the mechanism of sperm release [2] (Fig. 1). Little is known about the mechanism by which ectoplasmic specializations are assembled and disassembled [3]. In this study, we explore the hypothesis, originally presented in preliminary form elsewhere [4], that structures termed tubulobulbar complexes may be involved with the disassembly of ectoplasmic specializations and the internalization of membrane adhesion elements during sperm release.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Diagrammatic representation of the seminiferous epithelium illustrating the location of basal and apical ectoplasmic specializations and tubulobulbar complexes. Assembly and disassembly of ectoplasmic specializations occur at apical and at basal sites in the epithelium

Ectoplasmic specializations occur only in Sertoli cells and are tripartite structures consisting of the plasma membrane, a layer of actin filament bundles, and an attached cistern of endoplasmic reticulum. In basal regions of attachment between Sertoli cells, other junction types (tight junctions, gap junctions, and desmosomes) occur within and around ectoplasmic specializations. In apical regions of attachment to spermatids, other junction types are less apparent or are absent. Among molecules identified as components of ectoplasmic specializations are actin [514], {alpha}-actinin [6, 15], vinculin [16], espin [17], fimbrin [16], myosin VIIa [18, 19], gelsolin [3], rac1 [20], afadin [21], and Fyn tyrosine kinase [22]. Adhesion molecules identified at the ectoplasmic specializations include {alpha}6ß1 integrin [23, 24] and nectin 2 [21]. The binding partner for {alpha}6ß1 integrin on adjacent cells has not been identified. At basal junctions, the ligand for nectin 2 is likely another nectin 2 molecule in the ectoplasmic specialization in the adjacent Sertoli cell [21, 25]. At apical junctions, nectin 2 appears to bind heterotypically to nectin 3 in the plasma membrane of the adjacent spermatid heads [21, 25, 26].

Tubulobulbar complexes that develop between Sertoli cells and spermatids consist of tubular extensions from the plasma membrane of the spermatid head that protrude into corresponding plasma membrane invaginations of the adjacent Sertoli cell [27] (Fig. 2). Near the end of the tubular process is a bulblike swelling [27]. In the Sertoli cell, the tubular invagination is cuffed by a network of actin filaments and surrounding the bulbous region are elements of the endoplasmic reticulum, which are closely apposed to the plasma membrane. At distal ends of the invaginations are clusters of numerous vesicles, some of which have been identified as lysosomes [27].



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. The ultrastructure of tubulobulbar complexes. A) Cross-section through a mature spermatid head and adjacent Sertoli cell cytoplasm. Ectoplasmic specializations (es) and tubulobulbar complexes (tc) are visible. Bar = 200 nm. B) Diagram of the structure of a single tubulobulbar complex and its associated vesicles distal to the complex. Actin filaments surround the proximal tube and endoplasmic reticulum surrounds the bulbous region. C) Electron micrographs of vesicles found in the region of tubulobulbar complexes. The inset shows an example of a coated pit (cp) distal to the bulbous region of a tubulobulbar complex. The bulbous region is associated with cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum (er). The spermatid tubulobulbar process (tp) also is indicated in the inset. Bar = 200 nm, bar (inset) = 100 nm. D) Tubulobulbar complexes viewed in cross section. Dashed line marked by (tc) demarcates the actin surrounding the proximal tube of the complex. The center of the complex is the tubulobulbar process of the spermatid. An ectoplasmic specialization (es) is present around the spermatid head. Bar = 500 nm

The function of tubulobulbar complexes is not entirely clear, although a number of possibilities have been suggested. One possibility is that they are an attachment device between Sertoli cells and spermatids. In the rat, tubulobulbar processes are the last structures to disappear at sperm release [27]. Another possibility is that they are a mechanism by which material from spermatids is endocytosed by Sertoli cells during spermatid maturation. In cases where tubulobulbar complexes do not develop, spermatids do not reduce their volume normally during maturation and release is delayed [28]. Another possibility is that they are part of the mechanism by which intercellular junctions, particularly ectoplasmic specializations, are disassembled during spermatogenesis [4, 2830]. Pertinent to this possibility are three key observations made by Russell and Clermont in their original description of tubulobulbar complexes [27]. First, the structures occur in areas also occupied by ectoplasmic specializations, indicating that there may be a functional relationship between the two types of structures. Second, tubulobulbar complexes develop at basal junction complexes between adjacent Sertoli cells [27], indicating that the primary function of tubulobulbar complexes may not be related only to spermatid maturation. Third, ultrastructurally identifiable gap and tight junctions occur in the bulbous regions of basal tubulobulbar complexes, indicating that junction elements may occur in these structures [29].

In this study, we investigate the possibility that tubulobulbar complexes are involved in the disassembly of ectoplasmic specializations. We concentrate on the complexes that develop in association with apical junctions because they are much larger than those that occur basally, can be resolved at the light level using differential interference contrast (DIC) optics, have been better studied than those that occur at basal sites, can be isolated within apical Sertoli cell processes fragmented away from the epithelium, and can be located easily using late-step spermatid heads as morphological markers. We clearly demonstrate that tubulobulbar complexes develop in regions previously occupied by ectoplasmic specializations and that tubulobulbar complexes contain molecular markers for ectoplasmic specializations. In addition, we demonstate that vesicular elements present in the Sertoli cell apical processes surrounding the spermatid heads, and related to the tubulobulbar complexes, stain positively for nectin 2 and nectin 3. Nectin 3 is not present on testicular spermatozoa released from the epithelium, and double membrane vesicles occur adjacent to tubulobulbar complexes. These results are consistent with the possibility that adhesion domains of spermatids are internalized together with related regions of the Sertoli cell membrane at tubulobulbar complexes. Significantly, we also demonstate lysosomal/endosomal markers are present in regions occupied by Sertoli cell vesicles and that protein kinase C{alpha} (PKC{alpha}), implicated as being involved with the endocytosis of adhesion molecules in other systems, is present at sites containing tubulobulbar complexes. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that tubulobulbar complexes are involved with the disassembly of ectoplasmic specializations and with the internalization of adhesion membrane domains both of the Sertoli cell and the adjacent spermatid at the time of sperm release.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

All animals used in these studies were reproductively active male Sprague Dawley rats. They were obtained from the University of British Columbia animal care colony and were maintained according to the guidelines established by the Canadian Council on Animal Care. All experiments were performed at least in duplicate (most were performed more than three times) using separate animals.

Chemicals and Reagents

Unless otherwise indicated, all chemicals and reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Canada (Mississauga, ON). The paraformaldehyde and NaCl were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Vancouver, BC). All control immunoglobulins (IgGs) as well as all secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA). All secondary antibodies conjugated to ALEXA fluorochromes were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Polybed embedding resin was obtained from EM Sciences (Fort Washington, PA).

Immunofluorescence Tissue Preparation

Testes were removed from male rats under deep anesthesia. Warm (33°C) PBS (150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.8 mM KH2PO4, 3.2 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.3) was perfused through the spermatic artery using a 26-gauge needle attached to a gravity-fed perfusion apparatus for 2 min to clear the organ of blood. Following this, warm 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS was perfused through the testis for 30 min. PBS was then reperfused through the organ to wash out any remaining fixative.

Frozen Sections

Fixed testes were frozen (using liquid nitrogen) while at the same time being attached to an aluminum stub by OCT compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Torrance, CA). Frozen testis sections were cut, attached to poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides, immediately plunged into –20°C acetone for 5 min, air dried, and then processed for immunofluorescence.

Fragmented Material

Fixed testes were decapsulated in PBS and the seminiferous tubule was mass minced into small pieces. The pieces were transferred into a 15-ml plastic Falcon tube along with about 5 ml of PBS. The material was gently passed through an 18-gauge, then 21-gauge needle for 2–5 gentle passes. This fragmented material was left to sediment by gravity at room temperature for 5 min and then the upper layer was transferred to another tube. The cells in suspension were pelleted using centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended in a small volume of PBS, and then the suspension was added to poly-L-lysine-coated slides and allowed to incubate in a humidity chamber for 10 min. All excess PBS was then removed and the slides were immediately treated with –20°C acetone for 5 min and allowed to air dry.

Immunofluorescence

Slides with attached tissue fragments or cryosections were rehydrated and blocked with 5% normal goat serum (NGS) in TPBS-BSA (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 and 0.1% bovine serum albumin) for 20 min at room temperature. Primary antibodies consisted of rat anti-mouse nectin 2 antibodies (#502-57 [31]), rat anti-mouse nectin 3 antibodies (#103-A1 [32]), mouse anti-rat-l-afadin antibodies (#3 [33]), mouse anti-PKC{alpha} antibodies (Transduction Labs, Lexington, KY), rabbit anti-rat espin antibodies (gift from Dr. Jim Bartles [17]), rabbit anti-human myosin VIIa antibodies (gift from Dr. Tama Hasson [18, 34]), rabbit anti-kelch/keap1 antibodies (gift from Dr. Tama Hasson [19]), rabbit anti-SGP1 antibodies (gift from Dr. Carlos Ramon Morales), and mouse anti-LAMP1 antibodies (developed by Dr. J. Thomas August and obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Univ. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA). Antibodies were added to the experimental slides, made up in TPBS-BSA with 1% NGS, and incubated overnight at 4°C in a humidity chamber. The material was washed extensively with the TPBS-BSA (wash buffer), then incubated for 60 min at 37°C with secondary antibody conjugated to a fluorochrome (goat anti-mouse ALEXA 488, goat anti-rabbit ALEXA 568, or goat anti-rat ALEXA 546). The slides were again washed and then coverslips were mounted using Vectashield (Vector Labs, Burlington, ON). The tissue was visualized using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope fitted with appropriate filter sets for detecting fluorescence and with the appropriate optics for DIC or phase microscopy.

Controls for immunofluorescence localization consisted of the following: 1) Primary antibodies were replaced with normal immunoglobulin (IgG) (in the case of affinity-purified antibodies) or normal serum (in the case of non-affinity-purified serum antibodies) from the host animal species at identical concentrations to the primary antibody (when the stock concentration of primary antibody was not known, it was assumed to be 1 mg/ml), 2) primary antibody was replaced with buffer alone, 3) both the primary and the secondary antibodies were replaced with buffer alone.

Phalloidin/Phallotoxins

Filamentous actin was labeled using ALEXA 488 or ALEXA 568 phalloidin (Molecular Probes). The stain was made up in PBS or in TPBS.

One-Dimensional Western Blotting

Seminiferous epithelium was isolated from the testis and extensively homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1% deoxychloic acid [sodium salt], 10% SDS) before being loaded into wells of 1-mm-thick 10% SDS-PAGE gels and run according to standard protocols [35]. Proteins were transferred onto Immobilon-P transfer membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA), then washed for 5 min at room temperature with TBST (500 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20). The blots were then blocked to decrease nonspecific antibody binding for 8 h at 4°C using 4% nonfat milk (Blotto, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Following blocking, membranes were washed three times, 10 min each, then incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C. The following day, blots were washed extensively with TBST followed by a 1-h secondary antibody (conjugated to horseradish peroxidase) incubation at room temperature. Upon further washing with TBST followed by TBS, blots were reacted with enhanced chemiluminescence (Pharmacia, Peapack, NJ) to visualize the reactive bands on X-OMAT film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY).

Controls consisted of replacing the primary antibodies with IgG or serum at identical primary antibody concentrations or identical serum dilutions.

Electron Microscopy

Rat testes were removed and perfusion fixed for 30 min with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 1.5% paraformaldehyde, 1.5% glutaraldehyde. Each testis was then cut into small pieces and immersion fixed for an additional 90 min. The testis material was then washed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate for three 10-min washes, then further fixed on ice for 60 min in a 1:1 mixture of 3% K4Fe(CN)6:2% osmium fixative. Following the incubation, the material was washed three times with ddH2O, 10 min each wash, then stained for 1 h with 0.1% uranyl acetate. The material was then washed another three times in ddH2O, then dehydrated in an ascending alcohol series (50%, 70%, 95%, 100%), for 10 min at each concentration. This was followed by two incubations of 15 min each in propylene oxide. The blocks then were left in a 1:1 solution of propylene oxide:Polybed overnight. The material was embedded in 100% Polybed and then incubated at 60°C for 24 h. Sections were viewed and photographed on a Philips 300 electron microscope operated at 60 kV.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tubulobulbar Complexes Form in Areas Previously Occupied by Ectoplasmic Specializations

If tubulobulbar complexes are involved in the disassembly of adhesion junctions, then the structures should develop in regions where ectoplasmic specializations previously occurred. This was confirmed in spermatid/junction complexes that had been mechanically dissociated from the epithelium and visualized with DIC or stained with fluorescent phallotoxins to label filamentous actin (Fig. 3). In early elongate spermatids (Fig. 3, A–F'), bundles of actin filaments in ectoplasmic specializations completely surround spermatid heads. As the spermatids continue to differentiate, tubulobulbar complexes clearly form adjacent to the concave surface of rat spermatid heads in areas previously occupied only by ectoplasmic specializations. Moreover, the intensity of actin bundle staining in ectoplasmic specializations appeared to qualitatively decrease in association with ectoplasmic specializations related to the dorsal aspect of the spermatid heads while tubulobulbar complexes became more distinct. The development of tubulobulbar complexes in regions previously occupied by ectoplasmic specializations was confirmed at the ultrastructural level (Fig. 3G). Here, regions that at earlier stages of spermatogenesis contained only ectoplasmic specializations now contained tubulobulbar complexes that were flanked on either side by ectoplasmic specializations. These fluorescence and ultrastructural observations are consistent with the conclusion that tubulobulbar complexes develop in regions previously occupied by ectoplasmic specializations.



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Tubulobulbar complexes develop in regions previously occupied by ectoplasmic specializations. AF') Paired DIC and phalloidin-stained images of spermatid (st)/junction complexes that were fixed and mechanically dissociated from the seminiferous epithelium of rats. The series of images is a developmental one, with the least mature spermatid shown in (A) and the most mature spermatid shown in (F). Ectoplasmic specialization (es) and tubulobulbar complexes (tc) are labeled, as are vesicles (v). Note that the tubulobulbar complexes and associated vesicles are visible with DIC microscopy. Bar = 5 µm. In the electron micrograph in (G), a tubulobulbar complex is flanked on either side by an ectoplasmic specialization. The components of an ectoplasmic specialization (es) are labeled as is a tubulobulbar process (tp) of the tubulobulbar complex (tc). The endoplasmic reticulum is labeled as (er). Bar = 200 nm

Molecular Markers for Ectoplasmic Specializations Also Are Present at Tubulobulbar Complexes

If tubulobulbar complexes are involved with the disassembly of ectoplasmic specializations, then molecules found at the adhesion junctions also should be found at tubulobulbar complexes. Antibodies to espin, myosin VIIa, and Keap 1, all previously shown to react at ectoplasmic specializations, also react with tubulobulbar complexes (Fig. 4). On the basis of these experiments, we conclude that tubulobulbar complexes and ectoplasmic specializations share similar molecular components.



View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Actin-associated molecules found at tubulobulbar complexes. AC') Paired phase and fluorescent micrographs of spermatid/tubulobulbar complexes labeled with antibodies to espin (A'), keap1 (B'), and myosin VIIa (C'). Bar in A = 5 µm

Nectin 2 and Nectin 3 Are Localized to Tubulobulbar Complexes

Once we had determined that markers for ectoplasmic specializations were present at tubulobulbar complexes, we were interested to determine if integral membrane adhesion molecules present at the adhesion junctions also were present at tubulobulbar complexes. For these studies, we treated spermatids, with attached regions of Sertoli cells that had been mechanically fragmented from fixed mouse seminiferous epithelium, with antibodies to nectin 2 and nectin 3 (Fig. 5, A–B'''). We chose to use mouse tissue because the nectin antibodies do not react with rat material. In addition to labeling ectoplasmic specializations, antibodies to nectin 2 specifically labeled, in a vesicular pattern, regions known from actin staining to contain tubulobulbar complexes. Surprisingly, antibodies to nectin 3 labeled the tissue in a similar vesicular pattern to the nectin 2 antibodies, in addition to labeling the spermatid head. We conclude that immunologically reactive nectin 2 and nectin 3 are present in tubulobulbar complexes and in vesicles associated with their ends.



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Intercellular adhesion elements are found at ectoplasmic specializations, tubulobulbar complexes, and in vesicular regions associated with tubulobulbar complexes. AA''') Grouped phase (A), nectin 2 (A'), filamentous actin (A''), and merged images of mouse spermatids with associated tubulobulbar complexes (A'''). Bar = 5 µm. (BB'''). Grouped phase (B), nectin 3 (B'), filamentous actin (B''), and merged images of mouse spermatids with associated tubulobulbar complexes (B'''). Bar = 5 µm. Note in A' and B' the presence of a vesicular staining pattern (v) and labeling at ectoplasmic specializations (es). Phalotoxin-labeled filamentous actin identifies the location of ectoplasmic specializations and of tubulobulbar complexes (tc). (CE') A stage progression of paired phase and fluorescent images of anti-afadin-labeled rat ectoplasmic specializations and/or tubulobulbar complexes. Prior to tubulobulbar complex formation, afadin is present at ectoplasmic specializations (C'). As tubulobulbar complexes form, afadin appears at these sites and labeling at ectoplasmic specializations decreases (D'). Afadin is barely detectable at ectoplasmic specializations associated with late spermatids and is concentrated almost entirely at tubulobulbar complexes (E'). Bar = 5 µm

Afadin, an adaptor protein that binds nectin to actin filaments, had a similar yet distinct immunocytochemical localization. It too was found at ectoplasmic specializations as well as at tubulobulbar complexes (Fig. 5, C–E'). Interestingly, there was a distinct lack of staining along the dorsal part of the ectoplasmic specializations attached to the late-step spermatids (Fig. 5, C'–E'). When a step progression of afadin staining was investigated, staining of ectoplasmic specialization along the dorsal curvature of spermatids gradually appeared to decrease in intensity, whereas an increase in staining intensity was observed around tubulobulbar complexes where it formed a fingerlike staining pattern (Fig. 5, C'–E').

Profiles of Double Membrane Vesicles Are Found Associated with Tubulobulbar Complexes

The observation that antibodies both to nectin 2 and to nectin 3 labeled regions containing tubulobulbar complexes in a vesicular pattern suggested to us that plasma membrane adhesion domains of spermatids might be internalized together with similar domains of Sertoli cell ectoplasmic specializations. If this is true, then vesicles in the region should be surrounded by a double layer of membrane. This was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy. In sections of rat testis, double membrane-bound vesicles consistently were observed in association with the ends of tubulobulbar complexes (Fig. 6). These vesicles were distinguished from the bulbous region of tubulobulbar complexes by their lack of associated endoplasmic reticulum cisternae. At sperm release (Fig. 7A), similar profiles were observed in Sertoli cell stalks that support apical processes surrounding the spermatids being released (Fig. 7B). Also present in similar regions were multivesicular bodies (Fig. 7C). These results indicate that the appropriate morphological machinery is present in Sertoli cell apical processes for internalization of Sertoli cell/spermatid adhesion junction domains.



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Vesicles found associated with tubulobulbar complexes. Electron micrographs showing numerous single and double membrane (arrowheads) bound vesicles, as well as large vesicles (*) containing double membranes profiles (arrows). A tubulobulbar complex is indicated by the bracket in A. Bar (A) = 200 nm, bar (B) = 250 nm



View larger version (200K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Electron micrographs of apical regions of Sertoli cells at sperm release. A) Electron micrograph of a late-stage (VIII) spermatid at sperm release. Note the absence both of tubulobulbar complexes and of ectoplasmic specializations. Bar = 250 nm. B) Apical stalk supporting another spermatid at a similar maturation step as in (A) and containing a double membrane-bound vesicle (arrowhead) similar to those associated with tubulobulbar complexes at an earlier stage of spermatogenesis. Residual lobes (rl) of spermatids are labeled (rl). Bar = 200 nm. C) The apical Sertoli cell stalk supporting the spermatid in (A) containing structures resembling multivesicular bodies (mvb). Bar = 200 nm

Nectin 3 Is Present on Spermatids but Is Absent from Testicular and Epididymal Spermatozoa

If adhesion domains of spermatids are internalized by tubulobulbar complexes, then these domains should be absent from spermatozoa released from Sertoli cells. To verify this prediction, we stained mouse spermatids, testicular spermatozoa, and epididymal spermatozoa with antibodies to nectin 3. Antibodies to nectin 3 only reacted with spermatids (Fig. 8). We conclude that immunologically reactive nectin 3 is associated with spermatid heads but is absent from these regions once the cells are released from the epithelium.



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Nectin 3 localization in spermatids and spermatozoa. Paired phase and fluorescent images of nectin 3 and filamentous actin labeled spermatid/tubulobulbar complexes (AC') of a mouse. Filamentous actin labeling (A'') confirms the presence of both ectoplasmic specializations (es) and tubulobulbar complexes (tc) associated with the spermatid in (A). Nectin 3 also is present (A') in these structures. On both testicular spermatozoa (B) and spermatozoa in the epididymis (C), nectin 3 is absent (B', C'). Labeling of filamentous actin with phalloidin confirms that spermatozoa are not associated with ectoplasmic specializations or tubulobulbar complexes (B''). Bar in A = 5 µm

PKC{alpha} Is Associated with Tubulobulbar Complexes

If tubulobulbar complexes are involved with internalizing adhesion junction domains, then PKC{alpha}, a signaling molecule known to regulate endocytosis of junction proteins in other systems [3638], may be present in regions of Sertoli cells associated with tubulobulbar complexes. To explore this possibility, we probed rat testis fragments with antibodies to PKC{alpha}, which specifically labeled regions associated with the vesicular region at the terminal ends of tubulobulbar complexes in addition to labeling sperm tails. Similar staining was not present in controls (Fig. 9). The antibody labeled one band specifically on Western blots of rat seminiferous epithelium. This band was not present on normal IgG control blots. We conclude that at least one of the regulators of junction turnover in other systems is present at tubulobulbar complexes.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. Paired phase and fluorescent micrographs of spermatids with associated Sertoli cell regions labeled for endocytosis and lysosomal markers. AC') Paired phase and fluorescent images of mouse testis material stained with anti-PKC{alpha} antibodies and controls. The anti-PKC{alpha} antibody labeled areas known to contain tubulobulbar complexes (tc) in the mouse (A'). Both primary antibody NMIgG controls (B') and secondary antibody controls (C') showed no specific staining. A'') Western blot of rat seminiferous epithelium probed with the anti-PKC{alpha} antibody. A band at the appropriate molecular weight, 82 kDa, is present. The top and bottom of the gel are represented by bars. DD''') Phase (D), anti-PKC{alpha} (D'), and filamentous actin (D'') labeled and merged (D''') micrographs of mouse spermatids with associated Sertoli cell regions. Filamentous actin staining was used to ensure the presence of the ectoplasmic specialization. EE''') Phase (E) and double-labeled anti-LAMP1 (E') and filamentous actin (E'') images. Note that the LAMP1 antibodies label circular structures that are distal to the filamentous actin of the tubulobulbar complexes. FI') Anti-SGP1 labeling of rat spermatids with associated tubulobulbar complexes and controls. F') Antibodies to SGP1 specifically label punctate structures (arrowheads) in the vesicular region associated with the ends of tubulobulbar complexes. Some nonspecific staining occurs in the normal rabbit serum control micrographs (G'), but focal vesicular staining is absent. Staining also is absent from secondary antibody (H') and autofluorescent (I') controls. Bars on all micrographs = 5 µm

Lysosomal and Endosomal Markers Are Present in Vesicles Associated with Tubulobulbar Complexes

We rationalized that, if tubulobulbar complexes internalize junction domains from regions occupied by ectoplasmic specializations, then at least some of the material has to be degraded (spermatid plasma membrane) while other components (Sertoli cell plasma membrane) can either be recycled and/or degraded. In either case, lysosomal markers should be present in vesicles associated with the ends of tubulobulbar complexes. To test this prediction, we labeled mouse and rat testicular fragments with antibodies to LAMP 1 (an endosomal and lysosomal marker generally in cells) and SGP1 (a marker for lysosomes in Sertoli cells), respectively. In both cases, the antibodies labeled structures consistent with the structures being vesicles associated with terminal ends of tubulobulbar complexes (Fig. 9). Controls were negative.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The loss of intercellular adhesion between cells in the seminiferous epithelium is essential for sperm release and for the movement of spermatocytes from basal to adluminal compartments of the epithelium. Ectoplasmic specializations are large intercellular adhesion plaques formed in Sertoli cells at certain sites of intercellular attachment. In this study, we present evidence consistent with the conclusion that tubulobulbar complexes are part of the mechanism by which ectoplasmic specializations are disassembled and adhesion domains in the membranes both of Sertoli cells and spermatids are internalized by Sertoli cells at the time of sperm release.

At sites of apical attachment between Sertoli cells and spermatids, tubulobulbar complexes consist of tubular extensions of spermatid heads that project into corresponding invaginations of Sertoli cells. Also considered part of the complexes are the surrounding cuffs of Sertoli cell cytoplasm that are rich in actin filaments in some regions and elements of the endoplasmic reticulum in others. The terminal ends of the tubulobulbar complexes are associated with vesicles, some of which have been identified previously as lysosomes based on positive staining for acid phosphatase [39]. The most popular hypothesis for the function of tubulobulbar complexes is that they function as a mechanism by which Sertoli cells phagocytose cytoplasm from spermatids as these cells mature. An alternative hypothesis that would account for the presence of tubulobulbar complexes at basal sites of attachment between adjacent Sertoli cells is that the structures are involved with the turnover or disassembly of intercellular adhesion junctions [4].

A number of observations are consistent with the conclusion that tubulobulbar complexes are involved with the disassembly of ectoplasmic specializations at apical sites of attachment to spermatids.

First, tubulobulbar complexes develop in regions occupied by ectoplasmic specializations and both structures share many of the same molecular components. In electron micrographs, networks of actin filaments that cuff the tubulobulbar complexes are contiguous with actin bundles in the ectoplasmic specializations from which the tubulobulbar complexes appear to emerge (this study, [40]). Espin, Myosin VIIa, and Keap 1 are present in both structures (this study), as is vinculin [41] and {alpha}1 integrin [42]. The finding that espin is localized in the actin networks of tubulobulbar complexes is particularly interesting because this protein is thought mainly to organize actin filaments into bundles [43], such as those in ectoplasmic specializations. The presence of espin at tubulobulbar complexes may simply be the result of a rearrangement of actin bundles in ectoplasmic specializations into actin networks without loosing the association with actin binding proteins previously present. The observations that the structures occur together and share molecular components indicate to us that they are related and that tubulobulbar complexes may develop from ectoplasmic specializations.

Second, the integral membrane adhesion proteins nectin 2, in the Sertoli cell, and nectin 3, in the spermatid, appear concentrated in vesicles near the ends of tubulobulbar complexes. Although labeling of the vesicles needs to be confirmed at the ultrastructural level, the fluorescence data raises the novel possibility that plasma membrane adhesion domains both of Sertoli cell ectoplasmic specializations and of the attached spermatid may be internalized together by Sertoli cells at tubulobulbar complexes. Consistent with this possibility is the observation that double membrane-bound vesicles occur among the mass of vesicles present at the ends of tubulobulbar complexes and that similar vesicles are observed deeper in the cytoplasm of Sertoli cells at sperm release. Also consistent with this possibility is the observation that nectin 3 antibodies label spermatids attached to Sertoli cells but do not label spermatozoa released from the epithelium. The implication is that adhesion domains in the spermatid plasma membrane are removed by tubulobulbar complexes as part of the sperm-release mechanism. An alternative possibility that we cannot rule out is that proteolytic processing of the protein on the sperm head may contribute to the lack of nectin labeling on spermatozoa.

Third, the adaptor protein afadin that links nectin to the actin cytoskeleton becomes less concentrated at ectoplasmic specializations and more concentrated in tubulobulbar complexes as spermatids mature. There is a striking shift in afadin localization from around the head in elongate rat spermatids to tubulobulbar processes in mature cells just before sperm release. This change is consistent with the movement of adhesion-related elements into tubulobulbar complexes.

Fourth, PKC{alpha} is present in Sertoli cell regions surrounding tubulobulbar complexes and lysosomal/endosomal markers are present in vesicles associated with the ends of the complexes. PKC{alpha} is a known regulator of junctional protein endocytosis. Previous studies have demonstrated that vesicles associated with tubulobulbar processes contain acid phosphatase [39], and we show here that they also contain SGP1 (sulphated glycoprotein 1/cathepsin) and LAMP1 (lysosome associated membrane protein 1). SGP1 is known to label Sertoli cell secondary lysosomes. Lamp1 is a transmembrane glycoprotein that labels lysosomes and late endosomes [44]. These results are consistent with the conclusion that tubulobulbar complexes are involved with endocytosis and that at least some of the internalized material likely enters the degradation pathway.

Adhesion domains that are internalized in apical regions of Sertoli cells during sperm release could either be degraded or recycled (Fig. 9). At sperm release in the seminiferous epithelium, large intercellular adhesion junctions must be disassembled and adhesion domains in the plasma membrane eliminated. Results presented here indicate to us that tubulobulbar complexes are involved with internalizing junction domains both of Sertoli cells and of the adjacent spermatids. In other systems that have been studied, adhesion molecules that are endocytosed predominantly enter a recyling pathway from which they can be reinserted into the plasma membrane [38]. In apical regions of Sertoli cells, it is unclear how much junction material enters the degradation and recycling pathways (Fig. 10), although internalized nectin 3 from spermatids is likely degraded because this adhesion molecule is not expressed by Sertoli cells. How much, if any, of the nectin 2 from the Sertoli cell plasma membrane enters the recycling pathway remains to be determined. Any material that is recycled would have to be inserted into the plasma membrane at locations in the cell distant from sites where it was internalized.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10. Diagram of apical Sertoli cell regions indicating that vesicles internalized by tubulobulbar complexes may be degraded or recycled

At basal sites of attachment between neighboring Sertoli cells, tubulobulbar complexes also are present [27] and would be expected to function in a way similar to apical complexes. Preliminary studies we have done (unpublished data) indicate that tubulobulbar complexes are not nearly as abundant as one might predict if these complexes were the sole mechanism for junction turnover at these sites. At basal sites of attachment between Sertoli cells, junctions separate above translocating spermatocytes and are reassembled immediately below [1]. Although some internalization of junction elements may occur [29], it also is possible that many of the integral membrane junction molecules never leave the plane of the membrane but simply disengage from their ligands above the spermatocytes and reengage below. This movement of junction molecules in the plane of the membrane might account for the low number and small size of tubulobulbar complexes at basal sites relative to apical sites.

The internalization of intercellular adhesion domains by tubulobulbar complexes at sites of attachment between Sertoli cells and spermatids is potentially a significant component of the sperm-release mechanism in the seminiferous epithelium. The morphology of tubulobulbar complexes and the findings that lysosomal/endosomal markers and adhesion molecules are found in, or associated with, the structures are all consistent with the hypothesis that tubulobulbar complexes are involved with junction disassembly. These results do not rule out the possibility that the tubulobulbar complexes that form at sites of attachment to spermatids also may have secondary functions. The path of junction molecules through degradation and recycling pathways in Sertoli cells remains to be explored, as do alternative mechanisms for junction turnover at basal sites of attachment between Sertoli cells.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We would like to thank Dr. Tama Hasson for the antibodies to myosin VIIa and Keap 1, Dr. Carlos Morales for the antibody to SGP1, and Dr. James Bartles for the antibody to espin. The anti-LAMP1 antibody was developed by Dr. J. Thomas August and was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, developed under the auspices of the NICHD, maintained at the University of Iowa, Department of Biological Sciences.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by CIHR MOP 62728 awarded to A.W.V. and by a CIHR doctoral research award awarded to J.A.G. Back

2 Correspondence: A. Wayne Vogl, 313-2177 Wesbrook Mall, University of British Columbia, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T1Z3. FAX: 604 822 2316; vogl{at}interchange.ubc.ca Back

Received: 20 February 2004.

First decision: 22 March 2004.

Accepted: 1 April 2004.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Russell LD. Movement of spermatocytes from the basal to the adluminal compartment of the rat testis. Am J Anat 1977 148:313-328[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Russell LD. Spermiation—the sperm release process: ultrastructural observations and unresolved problems. In: Van Blerkom J, Modda PM (eds.), Ultrastructure of Reproduction. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1984:46–66
  3. Guttman JA, Janmey P, Vogl AW. Gelsolin—evidence for a role in turnover of junction-related actin filaments in Sertoli cells. J Cell Sci 2002 115:499-505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Russell LD, Goh JC, Rashed RMA, Vogl AW. The consequences of actin disruption at Sertoli ectoplasmic specialization sites facing spermatids after in vivo exposure of rat testis to cytochalasin D. Biol Reprod 1988 39:105-118[Abstract]
  5. Toyama Y. Actin-like filaments in the Sertoli cell junctional specializations in the swine and mouse testis. Anat Rec 1976 186:477-491[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Franke WW, Grund C, Fink A, Weber K, Jokusch BM, Zentgraf H, Osborn M. Location of actin in the microfilament bundles associated with junctional specializations between Sertoli cells and spermatids. Biol Cell 1978 31:7-14
  7. Vogl AW, Linck RW, Dym M. Colchicine-induced changes in the cytoskeleton of the golden-mantled ground squirrel (Spermophilus lateralis) Sertoli cells. Am J Anat 1983 168:99-108[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Suarez-Quian CA, Dym M. Detection of microfilaments in rat Sertoli cell ectoplasmic specializations with NBD-phallicidin. Int J Androl 1988 11:301-312[Medline]
  9. Vogl AW, Soucy LJ. Arrangement and possible function of actin filament bundles in ectoplasmic specializations of ground squirrel Sertoli cells. J Cell Biol 1985 100:814-825[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Vogl AW, Grove BD, Lew GJ. Distribution of actin in Sertoli cell ectoplasmic specializations and associated spermatids in the ground squirrel testis. Anat Rec 1986 215:331-341[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Camatini M, Anelli G, Casale A. Identification of actin in boar spermatids and spermatozoa by immunoelectron microscopy. Eur J Cell Biol 1986 42:311-318[Medline]
  12. Camatini M, Casale A. Actin and calmodulin coexist in the equatorial segment of ejaculated boar sperm. Gamete Res 1987 17:97-105[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Masri BA, Russell LD, Vogl AW. Distribution of actin in spermatids and adjacent Sertoli cell regions of the rat. Anat Rec 1987 218:20-26[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Fouquet JP, Kann ML, Dadoune JP. Immunogold distribution of actin during spermiogenesis in the rat, hamster, monkey, and human. Anat Rec 1989 223:35-42[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Jockush BM, Isenberg G. Interaction of {alpha}-actinin and vinculin with actin: opposite effects in filament network formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1981 78:3005-3009[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Grove BD, Vogl AW. Sertoli cell ectoplasmic specializations: a type of actin-associated adherens junction?. J Cell Sci 1989 93:309-323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Bartles JR, Wierda A, Zheng L. Identification and characterization of espin, an actin-binding protein localized to the F-actin-rich junctional plaques of Sertoli cell ectoplasmic specializations. J Cell Sci 1996 109 1229-1239
  18. Hasson T, Heintzelman MB, Santos-Sacchi J, Corey DP, Mooseker MS. Expression in cochlea and retina of myosin VIIa, the gene product defective in Usher syndrome type 1B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995 92:9815-9819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Velichkova M, Guttman J, Warren C, Eng L, Kline K, Vogl AW, Hasson T. A human homologue of Drosophila kelch associates with myosin-VIIa in specialized adherens junctions. Cell Mot Cytoskel 2002 51:147-164[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Guttman JA, Vaid KS, Vogl AW. Rac1 is present in Sertoli cell structures (ectoplasmic specializations) associated with intercellular adhesion. FASEB J 2002 16:A1100
  21. Ozaki-Kuroda K, Nakanishi H, Ohta H, Tanaka H, Kurihara H, Mueller S, Irie K, Ikeda W, Sakai T, Wimmer E, Nishimune Y, Takai Y. Nectin couples cell-cell adhesion and the actin scaffold at heterotypic testicular junctions. Curr Biol 2002 12:1145-1150[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Maekawa M, Toyama Y, Yasuda M, Yagi T, Yuasa S. Fyn tyrosine kinase in Sertoli cells is involved in mouse spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod 2002 66:211-221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Pfeiffer DC, Vogl AW. Evidence that vinculin is co-distributed with actin bundles in ectoplasmic ("junctional") specializations of mammalian Sertoli cells. Anat Rec 1991 231:89-100[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Palombi F, Salanova M, Tarone G, Farini D, Stefanini M. Distribution of ß1 integrin subunit in rat seminiferous epithelium. Biol Reprod 1992 47:1173-1182[Abstract]
  25. Takai Y, Nakanishi H. Nectin and afadin: novel organizers of intercellular junctions. J Cell Sci 2003 116:17-27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Mueller S, Rosenquist TA, Takai Y, Bronson RA, Wimmer E. Loss of nectin-2 at Sertoli-spermatid junctions leads to male infertility and correlates with severe spermatozoan head and midpiece malformation, impaired binding to the zona pellucida, and oocyte penetration. Biol Reprod 2003 69:1330-1340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Russell L, Clermont Y. Anchoring device between Sertoli cells and late spermatids in rat seminiferous tubules. Anat Rec 1976 185:259-278[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Russell LD. Deformities in the head region of late spermatids of hypophysectomized-hormone-treated rats. Anat Rec 1980 197:21-31[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Russell LD. Observations on the inter-relationship of Sertoli cells at the level of the blood-testis barrier: evidence for formation and resorption of Sertoli-Sertoli tubulobulbar complexes during the spermatogenic cycle of the rat. Am J Anat 1979 155:259-280[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Russell LD, Saxena NK, Turner TT. Cytoskeletal involvement in spermiation and sperm transport. Tissue Cell 1989 21:361-379[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Takahashi K, Nakanishi H, Miyahara M, Mandai K, Satoh K, Satoh A, Nishioka H, Aoki J, Nomoto A, Mizoguchi A, et al Nectin/PRRR: an immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule recruited to cadherin-based adherens junctions through interaction with afadin, a PDZ domain-containing protein. J Cell Biol 1999 145:539-549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Satoh-Hirokawa K, Nakanishi H, Takahashi K, Miyahara M, Nishimura M, Tachibana K, Mizoguchi A, Takai Y. Nectin-3, a new member of immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecules that shows homophilic and heterophilic cell-cell adhesion activities. J Biol Chem 2000 275:10291-10299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sakisaka T, Taniguchi T, Nakanishi H, Takahashi K, Miyahara M, Ikeda W, Yokoyama S, Peng YF, Yamanishi K, Takai Y. Requirement of interaction of nectin-1{alpha}/Hvec with afadin for efficient cell-cell spread of herpes simplex virus type 1. J Virol 2001 75:4734-4743[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Hasson T, Walsh J, Cable J, Mooseker MS, Brown SDM, Steel KP. Effects of shaker-1 mutations on myosin-VIIa protein and mRNA expression. Cell Mot Cytoskel 1997 37:127-138[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970 227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Ng T, Shima D, Squire A, Bastiaens PIH, Gschemeissner S, Humphries MJ, Parker P. PKC{alpha} regulates ß1 integrin-dependant cell motility through association and control of integrin traffic. EMBO J 1999; 18:3909-3923[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Le TL, Yap AS, Stow JL. Recycling of E-cadherin: a potential mechanism for regulating cadherin dynamics. J Cell Biol 1999 146:219-232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Le TL, Joseph SR, Yap AS, Stow JL. Protein kinase C regulates endocytosis and recycling of E-cadherin. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002 283:C489-C499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Russell LD. Further observations on tubulobulbar complexes formed by late spermatids and Sertoli cells in the rat testis. Anat Rec 1979 19 213-232
  40. Russell LD, Malone JP. A study of Sertoli-spermatid tubulobulbar complexes in selected mammals. Tissue Cell 1980 12:263-285[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Grove BD, Pfeiffer DC, Allen S, Vogl AW. Immunofluorescence localization of vinculin in ectoplasmic ("junctional") specializations of rat Sertoli cells. Am J Anat 1990 188:44-56[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Salanova M, Stefannini M, De Curtis I, Palombi F. Integrin receptor {alpha}6ß1 is localized at specific sites of cell-to-cell contact in rat seminiferous epithelium. Biol Reprod 1995 52:79-87[Abstract]
  43. Chen B, Li A, Wang D, Wang M, Zheng L, Bartles JR. Espin contains an additional actin-binding site in its N terminus and is a major actin-bundling protein of the Sertoli cell-spermatid ectoplasmic specialization junctional plaque. Mol Biol Cell 1999 10:4327-4339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Rhorer J, Schwizer A, Russell D, Kornfeld S. The target of Lamp1 to lysosomes is dependent on the spacing of its cytoplasmic tail tyrosine sorting motif relative to the membrane. J Cell Biol 1996 132: : 565-576[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. M. Turner, E. B. Chuong, and H. E. Hoekstra
Comparative Analysis of Testis Protein Evolution in Rodents
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2075 - 2089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
H. H. N. Yan, D. D. Mruk, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
Blood-testis barrier dynamics are regulated by testosterone and cytokines via their differential effects on the kinetics of protein endocytosis and recycling in Sertoli cells
FASEB J, June 1, 2008; 22(6): 1945 - 1959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
C. Q.F. Wang and C. Y. Cheng
A seamless trespass: germ cell migration across the seminiferous epithelium during spermatogenesis
J. Cell Biol., August 9, 2007; 178(4): 549 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
E. I. Surace, A. Strickland, R. A. Hess, D. H. Gutmann, and C. K. Naughton
Tslc1 (Nectin-Like Molecule-2) Is Essential for Spermatozoa Motility and Male Fertility
J Androl, November 1, 2006; 27(6): 816 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
A. Beardsley, D. M Robertson, and L. O'Donnell
A complex containing {alpha}6{beta}1-integrin and phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase between Sertoli cells and elongated spermatids during spermatid release from the seminiferous epithelium.
J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 190(3): 759 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/2/548    most recent
biolreprod.104.028803v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guttman, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vogl, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guttman, J. A.