Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print July 21, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.028175
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/5/1712    most recent
biolreprod.104.028175v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Britt, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Britt, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, J. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Britt, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, J. K.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 71, 1712–1723 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.028175
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Ovary

Estrogen Actions on Follicle Formation and Early Follicle Development1

Kara L. Britt2,3,4, Philippa K. Saunders5, Stephen J. McPherson6, Marie L. Misso3,4, Evan R. Simpson3, and Jock K. Findlay3

Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research,3 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,4 Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia MRC Human Reproductive Sciences Unit,5 Centre for Reproductive Biology, The Chancellors Building, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, United Kingdom Centre for Urological Research,6 Monash Institute of Reproduction and Development, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Estradiol-17ß (E2) affects late follicular development, whereas primordial follicle differentiation and early activation are believed to be independent of E2. To test this hypothesis we compared numbers of primordial and primary follicles in wild-type and E2-deficient, aromatase knockout (ArKO) mice, and the immunohistochemical staining or mRNA expression of Mullerian inhibiting substance (MIS), Wilms tumor 1 (WT-1), and growth differentiation factor (GDF9), which are known to effect early follicular differentiation. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) staining was a marker of proliferative index. The effects of E2 replacement for 3 wk in 7-wk-old ArKO and wild-type mice on these parameters were also tested. ArKO mice had reduced numbers of primordial and primary follicles compared with wild-type mice (63%, P < 0.001 and 60%, P = 0.062, respectively). This reduction was not corrected by E2 treatment, suggesting that E2 affects the initial formation or activation of primordial follicles. There was a significant increase in the diameters of the oocytes in primordial follicles of ArKO mice compared with mice of the wild type. There were no differences in the immunostaining of MIS, WT-1, and PCNA in primordial and primary follicles between wild-type and ArKO mice. The only difference was as a consequence of Sertoli and Leydig cells that develop in ovaries of ArKO mice. GDF9 mRNA expression was markedly increased in ArKO ovaries. E2 treatment restored the ovarian follicular morphology in ArKO mice, and consequently the immunostaining patterns, but had no effect on early follicle numbers. In conclusion, E2 has a role in controlling the size of the oocyte and primordial follicle pool in mice.

estradiol, follicle, follicular development, mechanisms of hormone action, ovary


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The follicle is the functional unit of the ovary that serves to protect and nourish the growing oocyte from the time of a follicle's formation through to ovulation. The ovarian germ cell endowment in mammals is established during embryonic development when oogonia undergo repeated rounds of mitosis, until the species-specific number of oocytes is established and oocytes then enter meiosis, although this theory has been questioned recently [1]. Close to birth in rodents and coincident with a drop in embryonically elevated steroids [2], the oocytes become progressively surrounded by pregranulosa cells and make the transition into primordial follicles. Primordial follicles are the stock from which all growing follicles and ovulatory ova are derived. In order to mature, follicles need to survive recruitment and selection, during which they develop gonadotropin and steroid receptors, to ensure their appropriate response to the cyclic fluctuation in hormones. Only 0.1% of primordial follicles that enter the growing phase will successfully pass all of the selection processes and ovulate their oocytes with the remainder undergoing atresia [3, 4]. Although we are beginning to delineate the factors controlling the later periods of follicle growth [57], those regulating the size of the initial pool of primordial follicles and the activation of primordial follicles are largely unknown.

Among the candidates regulating the size and activation of the pool of primordial follicles are increased levels of LH and Mullerian inhibiting substance (MIS), which have been associated with decreased numbers of germ cells, primordial follicles, or both [811]. On the other hand, MIS-null mice exhibit enhanced loss of primordial follicles that is consistent with a role of MIS in regulating activation of primordial follicles [10, 12]. Changes in the size and proliferation of pregranulosa cells are hallmarks of the transition of primordial follicles to actively growing follicles, suggesting that factors influencing cell cycle regulation may be important. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) can be used as an early marker of granulosa cell proliferation [13, 14]. The oocyte-specific factor, growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9), has been shown to mediate communication between the oocyte and surrounding granulosa cells in early follicles and to increase primordial follicle activation and growth [15, 16], while the zinc finger containing DNA-binding protein, Wilms tumor 1 (WT-1), is essential for ovarian formation in mice [17, 18] and may have a role in regulating the primordial follicle pool.

A role for estrogen (E2) in primordial follicle formation and activation has not been demonstrated in the rodent. Models of estrogen receptor (ER) deficiency have not shown a block in follicle development until the antral stage (for a review see [19]), however, quantitative measures of primordial follicle numbers have not been reported in these models. A role for E2 is plausible considering the presence of ER within developing ovaries, which possess only primordial and primary follicles [20]. The simultaneous activation of postnatal follicles and the drop in elevated E2 (5 x 10–7M at 4 h after birth, to 2 x 10–8 48 h after birth) suggest that E2 may be important in the early stages of follicle formation and development in rodents [2]. It is also possible that E2 may have indirect effects on primordial follicles through factors such as those described above, which are known to influence follicle formation and activation.

Female aromatase knockout (ArKO) mice are deficient in E2 and offer an excellent animal model for testing the effects of E2 on follicle formation and early development. They have a block in follicular development at the antral stage and possess Sertoli cell-like cords. We have previously shown that E2 is not required for the initiation of follicle growth, but is necessary for the later stages of follicular development in ArKO mice [21]. However, we have not quantified the numbers of primordial follicles in ArKO mice versus wild-type mice. Assessing the expression profile of the genes for factors such as those mentioned above and postulating the influence of early follicle formation and activation in female ArKO mice may reveal direct or indirect actions of E2 on primordial follicle endowment.

The overall objective of these studies was to define the role for E2 in primordial follicle formation and activation by assessing the numbers of primordial and primary follicles. We also tested MIS and WT-1 protein and GDF9 mRNA expression in ArKO versus wild-type ovaries, because these factors have been implicated in follicle activation. PCNA staining in the ovaries of wild-type and ArKO mice was also compared as an index of cell proliferation. To further assess the role of E2, we quantified the numbers of primordial and primary follicles following E2 treatment of ArKO mice and examined the levels of MIS, WT-1, and PCNA protein and GDF9 mRNA expression.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Wild-type and ArKO mice on a J129/C57B6 background [21] were maintained under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions, on a 12L:12D regimen and fed ad libitum a soy free mouse chow (Glen Forrest Stockfeeders, Western Australia), with undetectable levels of isoflavones. All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee at Monash University and were carried out in accordance with the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes.

Tissue Collection and Processing

Daily vaginal smears were taken and stained using Diff Quick Stain (Lab Aids, Narrabeen, Australia). ArKO mice are acyclic [21] with vaginal smears showing persistent diestrus. All ovaries of wild-type and ArKO mice treated with E2 were collected at the end of the 21-day treatment, because these mice have vaginal smears indicative of persistent estrus. The ovaries from placebo-treated ArKO mice were collected at the end of the treatment period, because these mice do not cycle. Placebo-treated wild-type mice were collected in diestrus. Animals were killed at 6, 10, or 16 wk of age by cervical dislocation and one ovary from each animal (n = 5–6/group) was immersion-fixed in Bouins fluid. Fixed tissue was processed through a graded series of alcohols and embedded in paraffin wax. Serial 3-µm sections were cut, and every 10th and 11th section pair was stained with a modified Mason trichrome stain [22]. Intervening sections were kept for immunohistochemistry.

Estrogen Treatment

Subcutaneous pellets containing either 0.05 mg of 17ß-estradiol or placebo (Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, FL) were administered for 21 days to 7-wk-old wild-type and ArKO mice (maintained on a soy-free diet) as previously described [23]. Treatment was performed at this age because the development of Sertoli-filled cords begins in the ovaries of ArKO mice at this time [24]. The E2 pellets restored serum estradiol to 50–100 pg/ml (peak estrous levels) and increased uterine weights of ArKO mice to wild-type levels.

Morphological Classification of Small and Growing Follicles

Follicles were classified as described previously [25]. In brief, follicles were classified as primordial if they contained an oocyte surrounded by a complete layer of squamous granulosa cells. Follicles that included some cuboidal granulosa cells but still had a majority of squamous granulosa cells were also classified as primordial (also called transitory primordial follicles). Primary follicles showed a single layer of cuboidal granulosa cells; follicles that had both cuboidal and squamous granulosa cells, in which cuboidal cells predominated, were classified as primary. Many previous investigations used the Pedersen and Peters [26] follicle classification scheme, which determines class based on granulosa cell number rather than follicle and granulosa cell appearance. In the present study, we have classified follicles according to the type (squamous or cuboidal) and number of granulosa cell layers, which correspond to types 1 to 3b described by Pedersen and Peters [26]. Secondary follicles possessed two or more layers of cuboidal granulosa cells without an antrum. Antral follicles contained fluid-filled spaces within their granulosa cell layers. They were classified as small antral if they possessed less than five granulosa cell layers, and as large antral follicles when the granulosa cell layers exceeded five layers. Multioocyte follicles contained more than one oocyte enclosed within the granulosa cell layer or layers.

Quantification of Early Follicles

A fractionator/physical dissector design [27, 28] was used to estimate follicle number in the ovaries of wild-type and ArKO ovaries obtained at 10 wk of age, as has been described previously for wild-type mice [25]. Briefly, follicle counts were made using the CASTGRID system (v2.1.4, Olympus Danmark A/S, Albertslund, Denmark) and a stereological design incorporating the fractionator and physical dissector. Estimates of follicle number per ovary were made by incorporating stereological sampling protocols on a predetermined fraction of ovarian serial sections. In this case, every 10th and 11th sections were used, and follicles (with visible nuclei) were counted if they appeared in one section but not the consecutive "look up" section, which ensures follicles are counted only once.

Oocyte and Oocyte Nuclear Diameters

Oocyte and oocyte nuclear diameters associated with all counted follicles were measured (n = 40–80 follicles/ovary). Profiles of oocytes and oocyte nuclei were measured by calculating the geometric mean of the long and short axes measured using the CASTGRID system.

Immunohistochemistry

For immunohistochemical analysis, four sections per ovary for each of three animals per genotype and treatment were used. Negative controls used in each study consisted of either normal serum from the species in which the primary antibody was raised (WT-1 and MIS) or immunoglobulin G (IgG)-matched negative preimmune serum (PCNA). Staining was assessed using a semiquantitative intensity classification. Staining was either absent (–), slight (+), or moderate (++). The positive controls for the MIS and WT-1 antibodies were immature Day 1 testis and adult wild-type ovary, respectively [2932].

Mullerian Inhibiting Substance

Paraffin-embedded sections were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for the MIS protein (also referred to as AMH) as described in detail in [33]. Following dewaxing and rehydration, slides were incubated in 3% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Slides were washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) 0.05 mol/L (pH 7.4) and 0.85% NaCl and blocked in TBS containing 5% BSA (Sigma) prior to addition of the primary antibody. Primary MIS antibody (goat anti-MIS; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) raised again human MIS (the sequence differs from mouse by a single amino acid) was used at 1:500, and slides were incubated at 4°C overnight. Slides were incubated with rabbit anti-goat secondary antibody conjugated to biotin at a dilution of 1:500 (rabbit anti-goat, Vector Labs, Burlingame CA). The biotinylated antibody was linked to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) by a 30-min incubation with an avidin-biotin-HRP complex (ABC-HRP; DAKO A/S, Glostrop, Denmark). Protein localization was then determined using diaminobenzidine (liquid DAB; DAKO). Slides were counterstained in hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted using Pertex mounting media (Cell Path Hemel, Hempstead, UK).

Wilms Tumor-1

Following dewaxing and rehydration, slides were subjected to citrate buffer antigen retrieval (microwave 5 min), and blocked in 3% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Tissue was further blocked in normal goat serum, TBS (pH 7.4) containing 5% BSA (Sigma), and avidin (4 drops/ ml). Finally, a biotin in TBS blocking step was also used.

Primary antibody goat anti WT-1 (DAKO) (amino acids 1–181 of human WT-1), was used at 1:500 and slides were incubated at 4°C overnight. Slides were incubated with rabbit anti-goat secondary antibody conjugated to biotin at a dilution of 1:500 (Vector Labs, Burlingame CA). The biotinylated antibody was linked to HRP by a 30-min incubation with ABC-HRP (DAKO). Protein localization was then determined using liquid DAB (DAKO). Slides were counterstained in hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted using Pertex mounting media (Cell Path Hemel, Hempstead, UK).

Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen

Proliferating cells were identified using monoclonal antibody to PCNA (PC10; DAKO). Before immunolocalization was performed, sections were rehydrated, then exposed to antigen retrieval (0.01 M citrate buffer pH 6.0, boiled 10 min). Subsequent immunostaining was performed using an automated DAKO Autostainer (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA). Briefly, sections were incubated with 0.03% H2O2 (DAKO) for 15 min to quench endogenous peroxidase. Sections were then treated with CAS-block (Pierce, Rockford, IL) for 30 min to block nonspecific binding before being incubated with primary antibody (1:1200, 30 min) or concentration-matched negative control mouse IgG2a. Primary antibodies were detected by 15-min incubation with biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse IgG2a and an avidin-biotin peroxidase kit (ABC-Elite, Vector Laboratories) for 15 min. Immunostaining was visualized by reaction with DAB (DAKO) for 5 min. Sections were counterstained with 0.1% Mayers hematoxylin, dehydrated gradually with alcohol, cleared with histolene, and mounted under DePeX (BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, England) before quantification of protein marker expression.

Gene Expression

The expression levels of GDF9 mRNA in ovaries of wild-type and ArKO mice treated with placebo or E2 were measured. RNA was extracted from individual ovaries using a phenol-chloroform based method (Ultraspec, Fisher Biotech) incorporating an additional chloroform extraction step, and followed by DNase treatment. RNA was reverse transcribed using random primers (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI). Complementary DNA was diluted 1: 20 and amplified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Roche) using Fast Start Master SYBR Green I (Roche), and specific oligonucleotide pairs. All PCR products exhibited a single peak in melting curves and were identified as single bands of the appropriate size on ethidium bromide gels. Amplified products were verified with sequencing. Experimental samples were quantified by comparison with cDNA standards of known concentration (0.01–1000 fg/µl). We have expressed all RNA transcript levels relative to 18S because it was the most reproducible housekeeping gene and had acceptable variation within genotype (coefficient of variation less than 10%). Three separate reverse transcription (RT) reactions per sample were subjected to PCR analysis and then the mean value was calculated from the three RTs, each corrected for 18S. For each separate RT on a group of age-matched ovaries, all mice across genotype and treatment were analyzed in a single PCR. This allows comparisons of expression to be performed across genotype and treatment.

Data are represented as relative levels of expression per amount of RNA. Transcript levels for GDF9 were assessed using in-house designed primers against mouse GDF9: forward, 5'-GAC CGC TCC ATC GCT TAC AAA-3'; reverse, 5'-CAC ACT TCC CCC GCT CAC A-3' (193 base pairs).

Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis of follicle number was performed using Sigmastat statistical software (version 2.0; Jandel Corporation, San Rafael, CA). If data were normally distributed, they were subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). If data were not normally distributed they were log transformed and then subjected to two-way ANOVA. If genotype or treatment had a significant effect on follicle number, diameter, or gene expression, multiple pairwise comparisons were made using a Tukey test. If no effect was observed between treatments within the same genotype, for graphical purposes, data were pooled and genotypes were compared. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Statistical analysis of oocyte and oocyte nuclear diameters were performed using Minitab statistical software (Minitab Inc., State College, PA). An ANOVA was performed on data using the mouse as a random factor nested within treatment. As the number of observations per animal were not equal across the groups studied, the diameters of the oocytes measured in each mouse were averaged, ensuring unbiased variance. Although averaging the values for each mouse leads to some lack of homogeneity in the standard deviations, because the number of observations per mouse are not the same, the Levene and Bartlett test for heterogeneity of variance is not significant (P = 0.703, P = 0.442). A two-way ANOVA was then performed, followed by a Tukey posthoc test defining the differences in genotype and treatment. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Folliculogenesis in ArKO Mice (10 wk of Age)

Follicle number per ovary Numbers of primordial follicles (Table 1) were decreased in ArKO mice compared with wild-type mice (P = 0.034), and primary follicle numbers (Table 1) showed a decrease that was approaching significance (P = 0.062). No significant effect of E2 treatment was observed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Numbers of follicles per ovary in 10-wk-old wild-type (Wt) and ArKO mice treated with either placebo or E2 for 3 wk.*

Oocyte diameters—primordial follicles Despite a high variability between mice among each group (same genotype and treatment) diameters of oocytes in primordial follicles (Table 2) were increased in placebo-treated ArKO mice compared with placebo-treated wild-type mice (P < 0.05), and oocyte diameter was decreased in both wild-type and ArKO mice treated with E2 (P = 0.015) compared with placebo treated, genotype matched controls (P < 0.05). The diameters of primordial oocyte nuclei (Table 2) were increased in placebo treated ArKO placebo versus wild-type mice, although the variance between mice masked the significance of these differences (P = 0.091). Again, E2 treatment in both wild-type and ArKO mice decreased oocyte nuclear diameter compared with their placebo counterparts, although the variance between mice masked the significance of these differences (P < 0.057). Using the diameters of the oocytes described above, the oocyte volumes were calculated. The oocyte volume in ArKO follicles was increased by 13% compared with placebo-treated wild-type controls, and was decreased by 9% in ArKO + E2 compared with ArKO + placebo. Wild-type + E2 oocyte volumes were decreased by 7% compared with those of wild-type + placebo. Similarly, the nuclear oocyte volume in ArKO oocytes was increased by 16% compared with placebo-treated wild-type controls. The oocyte nuclear volumes were decreased by 19% in ArKO + E2 mice compared with ArKO + placebo mice. In wild-type + E2 animals, oocyte nuclear volume was decreased by 5% compared with wild-type mice + placebo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Diameters (µm) of the oocyte and its nucleus in primordial and primary follicles of 10-wk-old wild-type (Wt) and ArKO mice treated with either placebo or E2 for 3 wk.*

Oocyte diameters—primary follicles No variability among mice within each group (same genotype and treatment) was noted for oocyte, or oocyte nuclear diameter measurements within primary follicles. When oocyte diameters (Table 2) were tested, differences were found among the four treatments (P < 0.001), the only significant pair being an increase in oocyte diameter in E2-treated ArKO mice compared with placebo-treated wild-type mice (Tukey posthoc test, P = 0.05). Oocyte nuclear diameters (Table 2) were similar in wild-type and ArKO mice, both treated and untreated. A comparison of the data in Table 2 shows that both oocyte and oocyte nuclear diameter increased as follicles moved from primordial to primary, irrespective of genotype or E2 treatment. Table 3 summarizes the mean percentage changes in oocyte and oocyte nuclear diameters induced by E2 treatment. The change was greater in ArKO mice than in wild-type mice for both primordial and primary follicles.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Mean percentage change in oocyte and oocyte nuclear di ameters of early follicles following wing E2 treatment of Wt and ArKO mice, based on data presented in Table 2

The volume of oocytes in primary ArKO follicles was increased by 7% compared with wild-type, placebo-treated controls, and was increased by 22.5% in ArKO + E2 compared with ArKO + placebo. Volumes of wild-type + E2 follicles were also increased by 11% compared with those of the wild-type placebo. Similarly, the nuclear oocyte volume in ArKO follicles was increased by 8% compared with that of placebo-treated wild-type controls. The oocyte nuclear volumes were decreased by 3% in ArKO +E2 compared with ArKO + placebo. E2 treatment had no effect on oocyte nuclear volumes in wild-type follicles.

Multioocyte follicles The numbers of primordial multioocyte follicles (MOFs) as a percentage of total primordial follicles were similar in wild-type mice treated with either placebo (5.4%), or E2 (4.3%) and ArKO mice treated with either placebo (4.8%) or E2 (5.9%). The numbers of primary stage MOFs was similar in wild-type mice treated with either placebo (2.4%) or E2 (5.7%). There were no significant differences in the numbers of primary stage MOFs observed in ArKO mice treated with either placebo (8.1%) or E2 treatments (7.6%), or between ArKO and wild-type mice.

Mullerian Inhibiting Substance

No MIS staining was observed in primordial follicles of either genotype (data not shown). In 10-wk-old wild-type ovaries, MIS staining was observed in the granulosa cells of primary and secondary follicles (Fig. 1, A and B), whereas large antral follicles did not show MIS expression (Fig. 1C). The interstitial region of wild-type ovaries was largely negative for MIS staining (Fig. 1, A–C). The primary and secondary follicles of ArKO ovaries stained positively for MIS (Fig. 1, D and E), whereas antral follicles were negative (Fig. 1F). The Sertoli-filled cords, which predominated in 16-wk-old ArKO ovaries, did not stain positively for MIS (Fig. 1, G and H), although the Leydig cells surrounding these cords showed intense MIS staining (Fig. 1, G and H).



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Immunohistochemical localization of MIS in follicle populations within wild-type and ArKO ovaries. MIS protein expression is detected in the primary (A), secondary, and preantral (B) follicles of 10-wk-old wild-type ovaries, yet is absent from antral follicles (C). ArKO ovaries at 10 wk of age also show primary (D), secondary, and preantral (E) expression, although no antral stage staining (F). In 16-wk-old ArKO ovaries, Sertoli cells (arrow) of cord-like structures did not stain positively for MIS (G), whereas the Leydig cells (arrowhead) surrounding them were clearly positive (H). Scale bar represents 0–100 µm

Compared with wild-type ovaries (Fig. 2A), ArKO ovaries (Fig. 2B) showed increased intensity of MIS expression postpubertally. At 16 wk of age, the ovaries of ArKO mice had few if any antral follicles, and only a few preantral follicles; consequently, the extent of MIS expression appeared lower (Fig. 2C). Expression of MIS in 10-wk-old ArKO mice treated with estrogen was increased compared with placebo-treated ArKO mice (Fig. 2D). The intensity of immunostaining of MIS in 10-wk-old placebo treated wild-type and ArKO mice is summarized in Table 4.



View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Immunohistochemical localization of MIS in wild-type and ArKO ovaries. MIS protein expression is present in preantral and early antral follicles of 6-wk-old wild-type ovaries (A), is increased in age-matched ArKO ovaries (B), but is decreased by 16 wk in ArKO ovaries (C). Following estrogen treatment, a slight increase in MIS staining is observed in ArKO ovaries (D). Scale bar = 0–100 µm


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Intensity of immunostaining in the ovaries of Wt and ArKO mice.*

Wilms Tumor-1 (WT-1)

Wild-type ovaries (16 wk of age) showed WT-1 localization in preantral and small antral follicles (Fig. 3A). WT-1 localization was present in the granulosa cells of all follicles from the early primary and secondary stages of maturation (Fig. 3B) through the early antral stage (Fig. 3C). Large antral follicles of wild-type ovaries did not possess WT-1 protein (Fig. 3C), although the luteal cells of the corpus luteum did stain positively for WT-1 (Fig. 3D). The follicles of the ArKO ovary (16 wk of age) also stained positively for WT-1 (Fig. 3E) from the early primary stage of development (Fig. 3F). The adult ArKO ovaries did not possess many growing follicles, and many of the follicles that were present were transforming (Fig. 3G) into Sertoli-filled cords (i.e., they possessed both Sertoli and granulosa cells), or had undergone transformation and now appeared as Sertoli-filled cords (Fig. 3H); each stained positively for WT-1 protein. The intensity of staining for WT-1 protein was greater in ArKO ovaries (Fig. 3E) than in wild-type ovaries (Fig. 3A). The staining patterns of WT-1 in untreated wild-type and ArKO ovaries are summarized in Table 4.



View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Immunohistochemical localization of WT-1 in 16-wk-old wild-type and ArKO ovaries. The preantral follicles of wild-type ovaries exhibited positive WT-1 staining (AB), whereas antral follicles were devoid of staining (C). The luteal cells of corpora lutea in wild-type animals possessed slight staining (D). ArKO ovaries showed increased staining (E) compared with those of the wild type, including preantral stages (F), transforming granulosa-Sertoli follicles (G), and Sertoli cell-only filled cords (H). Scale bar = 0–100 µm

Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen

Overall, the intensity of PCNA staining was increased (more cells stained) in the ovaries of 16-wk-old wild-type mice (Fig. 4A) compared with age-matched ArKO mice (Fig. 4D), consistent with the atresia and transformation, which occurs in ArKO ovaries. Those early follicles that are present do not appear to show decreased PCNA staining in ArKO mice; rather, the presence of hemorrhagic cysts and Sertoli-filled cords in place of preantral and antral follicles accounts for the reduced PCNA staining (Fig. 4, B and C vs. E and F).



View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Immunohistochemical localization of PCNA in 16-wk-old wild-type and ArKO ovaries. PCNA is expressed in preantral and antral follicles of wild-type ovaries (A), staining in both granulosa and thecal layers (B) and in most granulosa cells of each positively staining follicle (BC). ArKO mice do not possess many PCNA positive follicles (D), largely due to the predominance of nonproliferative Sertoli cell cords (E), and hemorrhagic cysts (F). Scale bar = 0–100 µm

The localization of PCNA-stained granulosa cells in primordial and primary follicles was similar in wild-type and ArKO mice. The primordial follicles of wild-type ovaries showed positive PCNA staining in squamous pregranulosa and cuboidal granulosa cells of primordial follicles (Fig. 5, A and B), and cuboidal granulosa cells of primary follicles (Fig. 5B). The primordial follicles of ArKO ovaries also showed PCNA staining in squamous and cuboidal granulosa cells (Fig. 5, C and D). The staining patterns of PCNA in untreated wild-type and ArKO mice are shown in Table 4.



View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Immunohistochemical localization of PCNA in 16-wk-old wild-type and ArKO ovaries. The primordial follicles of wild-type ovaries showed positive PCNA staining in some flattened pregranulosa cells of primordial follicles (A), and in all granulosa cells of primary follicles (B). ArKO ovaries also showed staining in flattened and cuboidal granulosa cells of primordial follicles (CD). Scale bar = 0–100 µm

Growth Differentiation Factor 9

The relative expression level of GDF9 mRNA (Fig. 6) was significantly increased in 10-wk-old ArKO compared with age-matched wild-type animals (P < 0.001). No significant effect of E2 treatment was observed, although there was a trend for E2 treatment to decrease GDF9 mRNA levels in ArKO mice.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Expression profile of GDF9 mRNA in 10-wk-old wild-type and ArKO ovaries. Expression is shown relative to 18S following treatment with either placebo (P) or E2 for 3 wk. Values represent mean ± SEM of four to five animals. Significance is shown by *P < 0.001


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
These data show for the first time that a lack of E2 in ArKO mice is associated with a decrease in primordial and primary follicle number compared with wild-type mice at 10 wk of age. Concomitantly, there was an increase in the diameters of the oocytes in primordial follicles of ArKO mice. After E2 treatment for 3 wk, from 7–10 wk of age, the numbers of primordial and primary follicles were not significantly changed, but the oocyte and nuclear diameters in primordial follicles were decreased, with follicles of ArKO mice showing a greater change than those of wild-type mice. There were no obvious differences in the immunostaining of MIS, WT-1, or PCNA in primordial and primary follicles between ArKO and wild-type mice. Any differences that were observed were seen in the antral follicle populations or in the Sertoli and Leydig cells that form in the ovaries of older ArKO mice. E2 treatment of ArKO mice resulted in staining patterns of MIS, WT-1, and PCNA that were similar to staining in wild-type ovaries. Thus, changes were related to the improvement in overall ovarian morphology, rather than to specific changes in primordial and primary follicles. Of interest was the absence of detectable PCNA staining in the Sertoli and Leydig cells in the ArKO ovaries, which would suggest that these are not proliferating Sertoli Leydig cell tumors.

The decrease in primordial and primary follicles in the ovaries of ArKO compared with wild-type mice may be due to either 1) fewer primordial follicles forming from germ cell clusters, 2) increased activation of primordial follicles such that more primordial follicles enter the growing pool of follicles, or 3) earlier initial activation of primordial follicles in ArKO compared with wild-type mice, or a combination of the above.

Primordial Follicle Formation from Germ Cell Clusters

Consistent with the decreased number of primordial and primary follicles observed in ArKO ovaries, a decrease in the number of primordial follicles has been observed in embryonically E2-deficient baboons [34]. The E2-deficient baboons displayed a concurrent increase in the number of germ cell clusters, suggesting that the number of primordial follicles forming from germ cell clusters was decreased [34]. The proportion of MOFs in the primordial pool can be used as an index of the degree to which the process of follicle formation may be compromised. There were no differences in the incidence of MOFs between ArKO and wild-type mice in this study. It is possible, however, that an effect of E2 on MOFs in ArKO ovaries compared with wild-type mice was masked due to the background strain of mouse used, C57/BL6, which is known to have a high frequency of MOFs compared with other strains [35, 36]. Furthermore, the number of double oocyte primary follicles counted in the current study was only a small fraction (2.4%–8%) of the total number of primary follicles for which the counting protocol was optimized, suggesting that a more appropriate counting system may provide a more reliable estimate of double oocyte abundance. When 7-wk-old ArKO mice were treated with E2 in vivo, well after the time of follicle formation, no significant effects on the size of the primordial and primary follicle pools were observed, which is consistent with E2 playing a role in the formation of primordial follicles.

Follicle Activation

In cyclic females, a subset of follicles is activated each day and progresses to the primary stage with each cycle. An accelerated loss of primordial follicles from the resting pool has been observed during the initial wave of follicle growth in infantile rodents [37] and in perimenopausal women [38, 39], both situations associated with elevated gonadotropins compared with the reproductive years. Conversely, hypophysectomized rodents show a decrease in the initial recruitment as evidence by the larger resting pool compared with nonoperated controls [40, 41]. LH and FSH levels in ArKO mice are significantly elevated compared with wild-type counterparts [21, 42], which could mediate the reduction of primordial follicles in ArKO mice. LH has been associated with a reduction in the pool of primordial follicles; LH overexpressing mice display a 45% reduction in primordial follicles by 5 wk of age [11], which has been suggested to result from increased recruitment into the growing pool [11]. A role for estrogen in follicle activation was observed when comparing the rate of primordial follicle activation in culture, which is increased to 70% from the 30% observed in vivo, a phenomenon that has been postulated to occur due to the absence of the influence of circulating steroids [43]. However, in this study, E2 treatment of 7-wk-old ArKO mice for 3 wk did not affect the size of the primordial or primary pools, although it did reduce the serum levels of LH and FSH to within the normal range [44]. This suggests that E2 has no direct or indirect effect on the rate of activation of primordial follicles in mice.

Earlier Activation

An earlier onset of follicle activation in ArKO ovaries is supported by the fact that ArKO and estrogen receptor-{alpha} (ER{alpha}) knockout ({alpha}ERKO) mice undergo precocious follicular development; young E2 deficient mice possess antral follicles before their age-matched wild-type controls [19, 45]. Elevated LH levels, also present in both ArKO and {alpha}ERKO females, have previously been associated with increased primordial follicle activation [11] and precocious puberty [46]. Although the timing of the initial activation of primordial follicles was not directly assessed in this study, the increased proportion of preantral and antral follicles described previously in 6-wk-old ArKO mice [45] suggests that the onset of primordial follicle activation occurs earlier in development than in wild-type mice. Further experiments are needed to resolve these questions.

Postnatal Germinal Stem Cells

Recently, Johnson and colleagues [1] described the presence of stem cells in the postnatal mouse ovary that could give rise to primordial follicles and thus replenish the follicle pool. We did not examine the mouse ovaries in this study for the presence of these germinal stem cells, which could be influenced by estrogen.

Oocyte and Oocyte Nuclear Diameter

The transition from the primordial to the primary follicle stage in mice is coincident with a change in the shape of the granulosa cells and an increase in oocyte diameter [47]. Similar changes were observed in ArKO ovaries in this study. However, we observed that oocyte and oocyte nuclear diameters in primordial follicles were larger in ArKO mice than in wild-type mice. The reduction in oocyte diameters in ArKO mice after E2 treatment suggests a role of estrogen on oocyte size in primordial follicles. If the effect of estrogen on oocyte diameter is through somatic cell activation/proliferation, then we might have expected to see a coincident increase in primary follicles in E2-treated ArKO animals. It remains unclear which mechanisms E2 uses to influence the diameter of the primordial oocyte and its nucleus. Direct effects imply the presence of ER in the mouse oocyte, which have been described by Wu and colleagues [48]. ArKO ovaries contain both ER{alpha} and ERß [44], but their cellular localization has not been described. Alternatively, E2 may have indirect effects on the oocyte via ER in the somatic cells [49, 50]. GDF9 is expressed in the oocytes of all growing follicles and absent in oocytes from primordial follicles [51]. Increased oocyte diameters were noted in GDF9-null mice [52], in contrast to ArKO mice, which have increased ovarian GDF9 mRNA expression and increased oocyte diameters. Further work is needed to resolve these differences.

Factors Implicated in Primordial Follicle Formation and Activation

In this study MIS, WT-1, and PCNA proteins were localized to somatic cells of follicles from the primary stage of development onward, as has been described previously in wild-type ovaries [13, 14, 29, 5355]. However, no differences were detected before or after E2 treatment between ArKO and wild-type mice in immunostaining of these factors in primordial and primary follicles. The differences in immunostaining that were observed were confined to antral follicles, and to the presence of Sertoli and Leydig cells that appear in aged ArKO ovaries. Furthermore, the effects of E2 on the immunostaining patterns were related to improvements in ovarian folliculogenesis and morphology in general. This implies that the factors that we chose to examine do not play a part in the actions of E2 on the primordial and primary pools or on oocyte and oocyte nuclear diameters. This does not preclude a role for these factors in formation and activation of primordial follicles by pathways not involving E2 that have been described previously.

Because ArKO mice have 10-fold elevated serum testosterone levels [42], the possibility that follicle formation and activation are influenced by androgens needs to be considered. While various studies have shown that androgens are important for regulating the number of developing follicles [5658], no studies to date have directly assessed the effect of androgens on primordial follicle numbers within the ovaries of any species. Despite this, the fact that the androgen receptor is not detectable on primordial or primary follicles ([5962] and K.L. Britt, unpublished observations) would suggest that androgens do not affect these follicles directly.

MIS, WT-1, and PCNA in the ArKO Ovary

MIS protein staining in ArKO ovaries is consistent with the mRNA expression profiles [44]. Staining was increased in the granulosa cells of early antral and antral follicles of ArKO mice compared with that of wild-type mice at 10 wk of age. MIS was nearly absent by 16 wk. MIS was not observed in the Sertoli cells of ArKO ovaries, although there was distinct localization in the Leydig cells of ArKO ovaries, a site usually reserved for expression of its receptor, not MIS itself [63, 64]. The reduction in MIS staining in 16-wk-old animals reflects the increase in atretic follicles and Sertoli-filled cords, which are not MIS positive. These MIS localization patterns were also observed in one colony of double ER knockout mice [65], but not the other in which Sertoli cells were MIS positive [66].

Within the ovary, WT-1 is expressed in granulosa cells of primary to secondary follicles, and then diminishes with further follicle development [2931]. WT-1 is also expressed in the nuclei of testicular Sertoli cells of all ages [67]. WT-1 represses the transcription of several genes that are involved in differentiation such as inhibin {alpha} [30], IGF 1 receptor [68], platelet-derived growth factor, insulin-like growth factor 11, transforming growth factor-ß, and colony-stimulating factor [69], prompting its suggested role in inhibiting the differentiation of immature follicles [30]. It is believed, however, to be involved in follicular survival and growth [4, 7072].

WT-1 staining was increased in ArKO mice despite the loss of antral follicles [21]. The Sertoli cells in the testicular cord-like structures of adult ArKO ovaries [24] show a high intensity of WT-1 staining. This may explain the elevated levels of DAX-1 observed in ArKO ovaries [44], a nuclear receptor that is dependent on WT-1 for expression [73, 74]. However, the absence of MIS in Sertoli cells of the ArKO ovary suggests that WT-1 expression is not sufficient to maintain MIS expression.

PCNA staining was observed in antral follicles of both ArKO and wild-type ovaries, particularly in the granulosa cells, which is indicative of proliferation, as has been described for antral follicles previously [75]. However, no PCNA staining was detected in either Sertoli or Leydig cells present in ArKO ovaries, indicating a lack of proliferation by these cells. This can be interpreted as showing that they form by transformation from granulosa and interstitial cells, respectively, rather than by the proliferation of Sertoli or Leydig cell precursors. The observation of PCNA staining in primordial follicles that contained both squamous and cuboidal granulosa cells agrees with observations made previously [13, 14, 75] showing that primordial "transitionary" follicles possess proliferating granulosa cells. Furthermore, the expression of PCNA in the squamous granulosa cells of some primordial follicles observed in both wild-type and ArKO mice concurs with the same previous reports [13, 14, 75]. Additionally, granulosa cells within so-called transitory follicles are labeled following by tritiated thymidine (3H-TdR) infusion [76]. Overall, this suggests that granulosa cell proliferation in these primordial follicles precedes their morphological changes.

These data are consistent with E2 facilitating the formation of primordial follicles from germ cell nests, regulating the size of oocytes, and facilitating earlier activation of follicles from the primordial pool. The patterns of staining for expression of MIS, WT-1, PCNA, and the levels of expression of mRNA for GDF9 reflect the changes in follicular differentiation and transformation of ovarian cells to, and the lack of proliferation of, Sertoli and Leydig cells in the ArKO ovary. In conclusion, E2 has a role in controlling the size of the primordial follicle pool and the oocyte size in mice, which may have ramifications for fertility and infertility in mammals.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We acknowledge Michelle Welsh for excellent technical assistance with immunohistochemistry and Aaidan Sudbury for statistical advice.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This work was supported by NH&MRC grants 241000 and 198705 (J.K.F.) and by NIA R37AG08174 (E.R.S.). Back

2 Correspondence: Kara Britt, Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research, Monash Medical Centre Clayton, Block E, Level 4, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia. FAX: 61 3 9594 6125; kara.britt{at}phimr.monash.edu.au Back

Received: 4 February 2004.

First decision: 24 February 2004.

Accepted: 9 July 2004.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Johnson J, Canning J, Kaneko T, Pru JK, Tilly JL. Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature 2004 428:145-150[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Montano MM, Welshons WV, vom Saal FS. Free estradiol in serum and brain uptake of estradiol during fetal and neonatal sexual differentiation in female rats. Biol Reprod 1995 53:1198-1207[Abstract]
  3. Hsueh AJ, Billig H, Tsafriri A. Ovarian follicle atresia: a hormonally controlled apoptotic process. Endocr Rev 1994 15:707-724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. McNatty KP, Fidler AE, Juengel JL, Quirke LD, Smith PR, Heath DA, Lundy T, O'Connell A, Tisdall DJ. Growth and paracrine factors regulating follicular formation and cellular function. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000 163:11-20[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Campbell BK, Scaramuzzi RJ, Webb R. Control of antral follicle development and selection in sheep and cattle. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1995 49:335-350[Medline]
  6. Webb R, Campbell BK, Garverick HA, Gong JG, Gutierrez CG, Armstrong DG. Molecular mechanisms regulating follicular recruitment and selection. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1999 54:33-48[Medline]
  7. Richards JS. Perspective: the ovarian follicle—a perspective in 2001. Endocrinology 2001 142:2184-2193[Free Full Text]
  8. Jost A, Vigier B, Prepin J. Freemartins in cattle: the first steps of sexual organogenesis. J Reprod Fertil 1972 29:349-379
  9. Vigier R, Josso N, (eds.) Use of Monoclonal Antibodies to Anti-Mullerian Hormone in the Study of Sexual Differentiation. New York: Raven Press; 1986
  10. Behringer RR, Cate RL, Froelick GJ, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL. Abnormal sexual development in transgenic mice chronically expressing mullerian inhibiting substance. Nature 1990 345:167-170[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Flaws JA, Abbud R, Mann RJ, Nilson JH, Hirshfield AN. Chronically elevated luteinizing hormone depletes primordial follicles in the mouse ovary. Biol Reprod 1997 57:1233-1237[Abstract]
  12. Durlinger AL, Kramer P, Karels B, de Jong FH, Uilenbroek JT, Grootegoed JA, Themmen AP. Control of primordial follicle recruitment by anti-Mullerian hormone in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology 1999 140:5789-5796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wandji SA, Srsen V, Voss AK, Eppig JJ, Fortune JE. Initiation in vitro of growth of bovine primordial follicles. Biol Reprod 1996 55:942-948[Abstract]
  14. Wandji SA, Srsen V, Nathanielsz PW, Eppig JJ, Fortune JE. Initiation of growth of baboon primordial follicles in vitro. Hum Reprod 1997 12:1993-2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Vitt UA, McGee EA, Hayashi M, Hsueh AJ. In vivo treatment with GDF-9 stimulates primordial and primary follicle progression and theca cell marker CYP17 in ovaries of immature rats. Endocrinology 2000 141:3814-3820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wang J, Roy SK. Growth differentiation factor-9 and stem cell factor promote primordial follicle formation in the hamster: modulation by follicle-stimulating hormone. Biol Reprod 2004 70:577-585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kreidberg JA, Sariola H, Loring JM, Maeda M, Pelletier J, Housman D, Jaenisch R. WT-1 is required for early kidney development. Cell 1993 74:679-691[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Moore AW, McInnes L, Kreidberg J, Hastie ND, Schedl A. YAC complementation shows a requirement for Wt1 in the development of epicardium, adrenal gland and throughout nephrogenesis. Development 1999 126:1845-1857[Abstract]
  19. Couse JF, Korach KS. Estrogen receptor null mice: what have we learned and where will they lead us?. Endocr Rev 1999 20:358-417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Drummond AE, Baillie AJ, Findlay JK. Ovarian estrogen receptor alpha and beta mRNA expression: impact of development and estrogen. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1999 149:153-161[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Britt KL, Drummond AE, Cox VA, Dyson M, Wreford NG, Jones ME, Simpson ER, Findlay JK. An age-related ovarian phenotype in mice with targeted disruption of the Cyp 19 (aromatase) gene. Endocrinology 2000 141:2614-2623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gurr E, (ed.). Biological Staining Methods. Buckinghamshire, UK: Searle Diagnostics; 1973
  23. Jones ME, Thorburn AW, Britt KL, Hewitt KN, Wreford NG, Proietto J, Oz OK, Leury BJ, Robertson KM, Yao S, Simpson ER. Aromatase-deficient (ArKO) mice have a phenotype of increased adiposity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000 97:12735-12740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Britt KL, Kerr J, O'Donnell L, Jones ME, Drummond AE, Davis SR, Simpson ER, Findlay JK. Estrogen regulates development of the somatic cell phenotype in the eutherian ovary. FASEB J 2002 16:1389-1397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Myers M, Britt KL, Wreford NG, Ebling FJP, Kerr JB. Methods for quantifying follicle numbers within the mouse ovary. Reproduction 2004 127:569-580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Pedersen T, Peters H. Proposal for a classification of oocytes and follicles in the mouse ovary. J Reprod Fertil 1968 17:555-557
  27. Braendgaard H, Evans SM, Howard CV, Gundersen HJ. The total number of neurons in the human neocortex unbiasedly estimated using optical disectors. J Microsc 1990 157:Pt 3285-304[Medline]
  28. Miller PB, Charleston JS, Battaglia DE, Klein NA, Soules MR. An accurate, simple method for unbiased determination of primordial follicle number in the primate ovary. Biol Reprod 1997 56:909-915[Abstract]
  29. Pelletier J, Schalling M, Buckler AJ, Rogers A, Haber DA, Housman D. Expression of the Wilms' tumor gene WT1 in the murine urogenital system. Genes Dev 1991 5:1345-1356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hsu SY, Kubo M, Chun SY, Haluska FG, Housman DE, Hsueh AJ. Wilms' tumor protein WT1 as an ovarian transcription factor: decreases in expression during follicle development and repression of inhibin-alpha gene promoter. Mol Endocrinol 1995 9:1356-1366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Chun SY, McGee EA, Hsu SY, Minami S, LaPolt PS, Yao HH, Bahr JM, Gougeon A, Schomberg DW, Hsueh AJ. Restricted expression of WT1 messenger ribonucleic acid in immature ovarian follicles: uniformity in mammalian and avian species and maintenance during reproductive senescence. Biol Reprod 1999 60:365-373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Swain A, Lovell-Badge R. Mammalian sex determination: a molecular drama. Genes Dev 1999 13:755-767[Free Full Text]
  33. Fisher JS, Macpherson S, Marchetti N, Sharpe RM. Human ‘testicular dysgenesis syndrome’: a possible model using in-utero exposure of the rat to dibutyl phthalate. Hum Reprod 2003 18:1383-1394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Zachos NC, Billiar RB, Albrecht ED, Pepe GJ. Developmental regulation of baboon fetal ovarian maturation by estrogen. Biol Reprod 2002 67:1148-1156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Iguchi T, Takasugi N, Bern HA, Mills KT. Frequent occurrence of polyovular follicles in ovaries of mice exposed neonatally to diethylstilbestrol. Teratology 1986 34:29-35[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Jefferson WN, Couse JF, Padilla-Banks E, Korach KS, Newbold RR. Neonatal exposure to genistein induces estrogen receptor (ER)alpha expression and multioocyte follicles in the maturing mouse ovary: evidence for ERbeta-mediated and nonestrogenic actions. Biol Reprod 2002 67:1285-1296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Hage AJ, Groen-Klevant AC, Welschen R. Follicle growth in the immature rat ovary. Acta Endocrinol (Copenhagen) 1978 88:375-382
  38. Richardson SJ, Senikas V, Nelson JF. Follicular depletion during the menopausal transition: evidence for accelerated loss and ultimate exhaustion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987 65:1231-1237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ, Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod 1992 7:1342-1346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Edwards RG, Fowler RE, Gore-Langton RE, Gosden RG, Jones EC, Readhead C, Steptoe PC. Normal and abnormal follicular growth in mouse, rat and human ovaries. J Reprod Fertil 1977 51:237-263
  41. Wang XN, Greenwald GS. Hypophysectomy of the cyclic mouse. I. Effects on folliculogenesis, oocyte growth, and follicle-stimulating hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin receptors. Biol Reprod 1993 48:585-594[Abstract]
  42. Fisher CR, Graves KH, Parlow AF, Simpson ER. Characterization of mice deficient in aromatase (ArKO) because of targeted disruption of the cyp19 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998 95:6965-6970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Kezele PR, Nilsson EE, Skinner MK. Insulin but not insulin-like growth factor-1 promotes the primordial to primary follicle transition. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2002 192:37-43[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Britt KL, Stanton PG, Misso ML, Simpson ER, Findlay JK. The effects of estrogen on the expression of genes underlying the differentiation of somatic cells in the murine gonad. Endocrinology 2004 145:3950-3960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Britt KL, Findlay JK. Estrogen actions in the ovary revisited. J Endocrinol 2002 175:269-276[Abstract]
  46. Mann RJ, Keri RA, Nilson JH. Consequences of elevated luteinizing hormone on diverse physiological systems: use of the LHbetaCTP transgenic mouse as a model of ovarian hyperstimulation-induced pathophysiology. Recent Prog Horm Res 2003 58:343-375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Lintern-Moore S, Moore GP. The initiation of follicle and oocyte growth in the mouse ovary. Biol Reprod 1979 20:773-778[Abstract]
  48. Wu TC, Wang L, Wan YJ. Expression of estrogen receptor gene in mouse oocyte and during embryogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 1992 33:407-412[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Sar M, Welsch F. Differential expression of estrogen receptor-beta and estrogen receptor-alpha in the rat ovary. Endocrinology 1999 140:963-971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Mowa CN, Iwanaga T. Differential distribution of oestrogen receptor-alpha and -beta mRNAs in the female reproductive organ of rats as revealed by in situ hybridization. J. Endocrinol 2000 165:59-66[Abstract]
  51. McGrath SA, Esquela AF, Lee SJ. Oocyte-specific expression of growth/differentiation factor-9. Mol Endocrinol 1995 9:131-136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Carabatsos MJ, Elvin J, Matzuk MM, Albertini DF. Characterization of oocyte and follicle development in growth differentiation factor-9-deficient mice. Dev Biol 1998 204:373-384[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Munsterberg A, Lovell-Badge R. Expression of the mouse anti-mullerian hormone gene suggests a role in both male and female sexual differentiation. Development 1991 113:613-624[Abstract]
  54. Taketo T, Saeed J, Manganaro T, Takahashi M, Donahoe PK. Mullerian inhibiting substance production associated with loss of oocytes and testicular differentiation in the transplanted mouse XX gonadal primordium. Biol Reprod 1993 49:13-23[Abstract]
  55. Durlinger AL, Visser JA, Themmen AP. Regulation of ovarian function: the role of anti-Mullerian hormone. Reproduction 2002 124:601-609[Abstract]
  56. Hillier SG, Tetsuka M. Role of androgens in follicle maturation and atresia. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1997 11:249-260[Medline]
  57. Vendola KA, Zhou J, Adesanya OO, Weil SJ, Bondy CA. Androgens stimulate early stages of follicular growth in the primate ovary. J Clin Invest 1998 101:2622-2629[Medline]
  58. Vendola K, Zhou J, Wang J, Famuyiwa OA, Bievre M, Bondy CA. Androgens promote oocyte insulin-like growth factor I expression and initiation of follicle development in the primate ovary. Biol Reprod 1999 61:353-357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Tetsuka M, Whitelaw PF, Bremner WJ, Millar MR, Smyth CD, Hillier SG. Developmental regulation of androgen receptor in rat ovary. J Endocrinol 1995 145:535-543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Szoltys M, Slomczynska M. Changes in distribution of androgen receptor during maturation of rat ovarian follicles. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2000 108:228-234[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Cardenas H, Pope WF. Androgen receptor and follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in the pig ovary during the follicular phase of the estrous cycle. Mol Reprod Dev 2002 62:92-98[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. Szoltys M, Slomczynska M, Tabarowski Z. Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptor in rat oocytes. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2003 41:59-64[Medline]
  63. Racine C, Rey R, Forest MG, Louis F, Ferre A, Huhtaniemi I, Josso N, di Clemente N. Receptors for anti-mullerian hormone on Leydig cells are responsible for its effects on steroidogenesis and cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998 95:594-599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Lee MM, Seah CC, Masiakos PT, Sottas CM, Preffer FI, Donahoe PK, Maclaughlin DT, Hardy MP. Mullerian-inhibiting substance type II receptor expression and function in purified rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 1999 140:2819-2827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Dupont S, Krust A, Gansmuller A, Dierich A, Chambon P, Mark M. Effect of single and compound knockouts of estrogen receptors alpha (ERalpha) and beta (ERbeta) on mouse reproductive phenotypes. Development 2000 127:4277-4291[Abstract]
  66. Couse JF, Hewitt SC, Bunch DO, Sar M, Walker VR, Davis BJ, Korach KS. Postnatal sex reversal of the ovaries in mice lacking estrogen receptors alpha and beta. Science 1999 286:2328-2331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Sharpe RM, McKinnell C, Kivlin C, Fisher JS. Proliferation and functional maturation of Sertoli cells, and their relevance to disorders of testis function in adulthood. Reproduction 2003 125:769-784[Abstract]
  68. Werner H, Rauscher FJ 3rd, Sukhatme VP, Drummond IA, Roberts CT Jr, LeRoith D. Transcriptional repression of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-I-R) gene by the tumor suppressor WT1 involves binding to sequences both upstream and downstream of the IGF-I-R gene transcription start site. J Biol Chem 1994 269:12577-12582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Williams AJ, Khachigian LM, Shows T, Collins T. Isolation and characterization of a novel zinc-finger protein with transcription repressor activity. J Biol Chem 1995 270:22143-22152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Pritchard-Jones K, Fleming S, Davidson D, Bickmore W, Porteous D, Gosden C, Bard J, Buckler A, Pelletier J, Housman D, van Heyningen V, Hastie N. The candidate Wilms' tumour gene is involved in genitourinary development. Nature 1990 346:194-197[CrossRef][Medline]
  71. Tilly KI, Banerjee S, Banerjee PP, Tilly JL. Expression of the p53 and Wilms' tumor suppressor genes in the rat ovary: gonadotropin repression in vivo and immunohistochemical localization of nuclear p53 protein to apoptotic granulosa cells of atretic follicles. Endocrinology 1995 136:1394-1402[Abstract]
  72. Kreidberg JA, Natoli TA, McGinnis L, Donovan M, Biggers JD, Amstutz A. Coordinate action of Wt1 and a modifier gene supports embryonic survival in the oviduct. Mol Reprod Dev 1999 52:366-375[CrossRef][Medline]
  73. Kim J, Prawitt D, Bardeesy N, Torban E, Vicaner C, Goodyer P, Zabel B, Pelletier J. The Wilms' tumor suppressor gene (wt1) product regulates Dax-1 gene expression during gonadal differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 1999 19:2289-2299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Hammes A, Guo JK, Lutsch G, Leheste JR, Landrock D, Ziegler U, Gubler MC, Schedl A. Two splice variants of the Wilms' tumor 1 gene have distinct functions during sex determination and nephron formation. Cell 2001 106:319-329[CrossRef][Medline]
  75. Oktay K, Schenken RS, Nelson JF. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen marks the initiation of follicular growth in the rat. Biol Reprod 1995 53:295-301[Abstract]
  76. Hirshfield AN. Granulosa cell proliferation in very small follicles of cycling rats studied by long-term continuous tritiated-thymidine infusion. Biol Reprod 1989 41:309-316[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Smith, T. L. Steckler, A. Veiga-Lopez, and V. Padmanabhan
Developmental Programming: Differential Effects of Prenatal Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone on Follicular Recruitment, Depletion of Follicular Reserve, and Ovarian Morphology in Sheep
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2009; 80(4): 726 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E. A McLaughlin and S. C McIver
Awakening the oocyte: controlling primordial follicle development
Reproduction, January 1, 2009; 137(1): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Wang, E. R. Prossnitz, and S. K. Roy
G Protein-Coupled Receptor 30 Expression Is Required for Estrogen Stimulation of Primordial Follicle Formation in the Hamster Ovary
Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4452 - 4461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. M Seneda, M. Godmann, B. D Murphy, S. Kimmins, and V. Bordignon
Developmental regulation of histone H3 methylation at lysine 4 in the porcine ovary
Reproduction, June 1, 2008; 135(6): 829 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. L. Kipp, S. M. Kilen, T. K. Woodruff, and K. E. Mayo
Activin Regulates Estrogen Receptor Gene Expression in the Mouse Ovary
J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2007; 282(50): 36755 - 36765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Wang, E. R. Prossnitz, and S. K. Roy
Expression of G Protein-Coupled Receptor 30 in the Hamster Ovary: Differential Regulation by Gonadotropins and Steroid Hormones
Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4853 - 4864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. Mayo, L. Jameson, and T. K. Woodruff
Eggs in the Nest
Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 3577 - 3579.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. L. Kipp, S. M. Kilen, S. Bristol-Gould, T. K. Woodruff, and K. E. Mayo
Neonatal Exposure to Estrogens Suppresses Activin Expression and Signaling in the Mouse Ovary
Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 1968 - 1976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Wang and S. K. Roy
Development of Primordial Follicles in the Hamster: Role of Estradiol-17{beta}
Endocrinology, April 1, 2007; 148(4): 1707 - 1716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
M. Sahmi, E. S Nicola, and C. A Price
Hormonal regulation of cytochrome P450 aromatase mRNA stability in non-luteinizing bovine granulosa cells in vitro.
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2006; 190(1): 107 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K. A Slot, J. Kastelijn, A. Bachelot, P. A Kelly, N. Binart, and K. J Teerds
Reduced recruitment and survival of primordial and growing follicles in GH receptor-deficient mice.
Reproduction, March 1, 2006; 131(3): 525 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. L Juengel, D. A Heath, L. D Quirke, and K. P McNatty
Oestrogen receptor {alpha} and {beta}, androgen receptor and progesterone receptor mRNA and protein localisation within the developing ovary and in small growing follicles of sheep
Reproduction, January 1, 2006; 131(1): 81 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
W. Jefferson, R. Newbold, E. Padilla-Banks, and M. Pepling
Neonatal Genistein Treatment Alters Ovarian Differentiation in the Mouse: Inhibition of Oocyte Nest Breakdown and Increased Oocyte Survival
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2006; 74(1): 161 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. K. Woodruff and K. E. Mayo
To {beta} or Not To {beta}: Estrogen Receptors and Ovarian Function
Endocrinology, August 1, 2005; 146(8): 3244 - 3246.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/5/1712    most recent
biolreprod.104.028175v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Britt, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Britt, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, J. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Britt, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, J. K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS