Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print August 18, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.034561
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/6/1968    most recent
biolreprod.104.034561v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 71, 1968–1973 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.034561
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Pregnancy

Effect of Maternal Nutrient Restriction in Sheep on the Development of Fetal Skeletal Muscle1

Mei-Jun Zhu3, Stephen P. Ford3, Peter W. Nathanielsz4, and Min Du2,3

Center for the Study of Fetal Programming,3 Department of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071 Center for Women's Health Research,4 New York University Medical School, New York, New York 10016


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The effect of maternal nutrient restriction on mTOR (mammalian target of rapamyosin) signaling and the ubiquitin system as well as their possible relation to growth of fetal muscle was determined. Ewes were fed to 50% (nutrient-restricted) or 100% (control-fed) of total digestible nutrients (National Research Council requirement) from Days 28 to 78 of gestation. Ewes were killed at Day 78 of gestation, and the fetal longissimus dorsi muscle was sampled for the measurement of mTOR, ribosomal protein S6, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), calpastatin, and protein ubiquitylation. No difference was observed in the content of mTOR and ribosomal protein S6, but the phosphorylation of mTOR at Ser2448 and ribosomal protein S6 at Ser235/336 were reduced (P < 0.05) in muscle from nutrient-restricted fetuses. Because phosphorylation of mTOR and ribosomal protein S6 up-regulates protein translation, these results show that nutrient restriction down-regulates protein synthesis in fetal muscle. No difference in AMPK activity was detected. The lack of difference in calpastatin and ubiquitylized protein content shows that nutrient restriction did not affect degradation of myofibrillar proteins in fetal muscle. Fetuses of nutrient-restricted ewes showed retarded development of muscles and skeleton. Muscle from nutrient-restricted fetuses contained fewer secondary myofibers than muscle from control fetuses, and the average area of fasciculi was smaller (P < 0.05). The decreased number of secondary myofibers in nutrient-restricted fetuses may result from the decreased mTOR signaling. Lower activation of mTOR signaling in nutrient-restricted fetuses may reduce the proliferation of myoblasts and, thus, reduce the formation of secondary myofibers. This decrease in secondary myofibers in fetuses may predispose fetuses to metabolic diseases, such as diabetes and obesity, in their postnatal lives.

early development, signal transduction


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The number of myofibers in muscle is largely determined during prenatal development of muscles [1, 2]; thus, numbers of prenatal muscle fibers have profound effects on muscle growth and development during later postnatal life. Postnatal growth of skeletal muscle mainly results from the increase in muscle fiber diameter.

During prenatal muscle development, primary myofibers are formed, followed by the formation of secondary myofibers [3]. Primary myofibers have peripherally located myofibrils surrounding an axial core of nuclei and cytoplasm [3, 4]. The secondary myofibers are derived from muscle precursor cells, which are initially maintained in a proliferating, undifferentiated state [4]. Those precursor cells differentiate into myoblasts and fuse to form secondary myofibers parallel to primary myofibers [3]. Because the availability of nutrients influences the proliferation of cells, we hypothesized that the number of secondary fibers in prenatal muscles is influenced by maternal nutrients and that maternal nutrient restriction would have long-term consequences on muscle growth and development. Results of numerous studies have suggested that maternal undernutrition influences the physiology and development of fetuses, with long-term consequences that predispose to certain diseases, such as diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases, during postnatal life [5].

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is critical both for sensing nutrient availability and for nutrient-stimulated muscle growth [69]. The downstream targets of mTOR are proteins that control mRNA translation [9]. Inhibition of mTOR leads to the arrest of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle [10, 11]. The mTOR signaling plays an essential role in skeletal myogenesis [12]. Thus, we hypothesized that mTOR plays a significant role in the control of altered prenatal development during maternal nutrient deprivation.

Protein degradation is important for regulating muscle mass. To our knowledge, no information about the influence of maternal nutrient restriction on protein degradation in fetal muscle is available. The calpain system and the ubiquitin-proteasome system play crucial roles in the control of muscle protein degradation. In a previous study of pregnant cows, we observed that calpastatin expression in fetal muscle was influenced by nutrient availability [13]. Thus, the calpastatin and ubiquitin systems may influence protein degradation in fetal skeletal muscle. Hence, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of maternal nutrient restriction on the development of fetal skeletal muscle and the possible role of mTOR signaling, as well as the calpastatin and ubiquitin systems, in this process.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

All animal procedures were approved by the University of Wyoming Animal Care and Use Committee. The detailed description of the procedures has been published previously [14]. Ten ewes of mixed breed were weighed on Day 20 of gestation so that individual diets could be calculated on a metabolic body-weight basis (weight0.75). The diet consisted of a pelleted beet pulp (79.7% total digestible nutrients, 93.5% dry matter, and 10.0% crude protein). Rations were delivered on a dry-matter basis to meet the total digestible nutrients required for maintenance of an early pregnant ewe (National Research Council [NRC] requirements) [15]. A mineral-vitamin mixture (51.43% sodium triphosphate, 47.62% potassium chloride, 0.39% zinc oxide, 0.06% cobalt acetate, and 0.50% ADE vitamin premix [8 000 000 IU of vitamin A, 800 000 IU of vitamin D3, and 400 000 IU of vitamin E per pound; amount of ADE vitamin premix was formulated to meet the vitamin A requirements] was included with the beet pulp pellets to meet requirements. On Day 21 of gestation, all ewes were placed in individual pens and fed control rations. On Day 28, five ewes were randomly assigned to a control-fed group (100% NRC requirements) and five to a nutrient-restricted group (50% NRC requirements) after equalizing for weight and body condition score. Body condition score can be used to estimate the energy reserve available to ewes [16]. Beginning on Day 28 of gestation and continuing at 7-day intervals, ewes were weighed and rations adjusted upward for weight gain and downward for weight loss. Ewes were killed on Day 78 of gestation, and fetuses were weighed. Fetuses were weighed again after removing their internal organs, and this weight was recorded as the empty body weight. Following weighing, a fetal muscle sample was immediately taken from the longissimus dorsi muscle on the right side at the level of the 12th rib. Muscle samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at –80°C until analyzed. Two ewes in both control-fed and nutrient-restricted groups carried twins; only one fetus of each twin pair was chosen for further analysis. All analyses were performed within 12 wk of fetal tissue collection.

Immunoblotting

Polyclonal anti-mTOR and antiribosomal protein S6 antibodies as well as phospho-specific antibodies for mTOR (Ser2448) and ribosomal protein S6 (Ser235/236) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA).

Muscle (0.1 g) was minced with scissors and homogenized in a polytron homogenizer (7-mm diameter generator) with 400 µl of an ice-cold buffer containing 137 mM NaCl, 50 mM Hepes, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 2 mM PMSF, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 2.5 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml of aprotinin, 10 µg/ml of leupeptin, 2 mM Na3VO4, and 100 mM NaF, pH 7.4. The protein content of lysates was determined using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) [13].

Each muscle homogenate was mixed with a same volume of 2x standard SDS sample loading buffer. A Hoefer minigel system was used for casting gels and running electrophoresis. Two identical, 5–20% gradient gels were used for SDS-PAGE separation of proteins, and the same amount of protein from each muscle sample (150 µg) was loaded on both gels, which were run under the same condition. Following electrophoresis, the proteins on the gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes in a transfer buffer containing 20 mM Tris-base, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS, and 20% methanol [13]. One membrane was used for the immunoblotting detection of total mTOR and S6, and the other membrane was used for detecting phosphorylated mTOR and S6.

Membranes were incubated in a blocking solution consisting of 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS/T (0.1% Tween-20, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], and 150 mM NaCl) for 1 h. Then, membranes were incubated overnight in primary antibodies with proper dilution in TBS/T with 1% nonfat dry milk. At the end of the primary-antibody incubation, the membranes were washed three times for 5 min each time with 20 ml of TBS/T. After that, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated monkey-anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:2000) for 1 h in TBS/T with gentle agitation. Following three 10-min washes, membranes were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting reagents (Amersham Bioscience) and exposure to film (MR; Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). The density of bands was quantified by using an Imager Scanner II and ImageQuant TL software [17, 18].

Measurement of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Activity

The AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity was measured as previously reported [19]. Briefly, muscle (0.1 g) was minced with scissors and homogenized in 400 µl of a ice-cold buffer containing 0.25 M mannitol, 0.05 M Tris/HCl (pH 7.8), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 50 mM NaF, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, and 1% protease-inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The muscle homogenate was centrifuged for 5 min at 13 000 x g at 4°C. The supernatant (5 µl) was incubated for 10 min at 37°C in 40 mM Hepes, 0.2 mM SAMS peptide (His-Met-Arg-Ser-Ala-Met-Ser-Gly-Leu-His-Leu-Val-Lys-Arg-Arg; Invitrogen), 0.2 mM AMP, 80 mM NaCl, 8% (w/v) glycerol, 0.8 mM EDTA, 0.8 mM DTT, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM ATP, and 2 µCi [32P]ATP (pH 7.0) in a final volume of 25 µl. An aliquot (20 µl) was removed and spotted on a 2- x 2-cm piece of Whatman P81 filter paper. The remaining [32P]ATP was removed with three washes of 1% phosphoric acid and one wash with acetone. The filter paper was air-dried, and radioactivity was quantified after immersing the filter paper in 3 ml of Scintiverse (Fisher Scientific, Hanover Park, IL). The coefficient of variation for AMPK analysis was 2.11%.

Histochemical Examination

Muscle samples were fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in a phosphate buffer (0.12 M, pH 7.4), embedded in paraffin, and cut into sections (thickness, 10 µm). Sections were rehydrated using a series of incubations in xylene and ethanol solutions and then stained with hematoxylin-eosin for standard light microscopy. Sections were also blocked with 10% serum, incubated with antimyogenin antibody (1:200 dilution, F5D monoclonal antibody; DSHB, Iowa City, IA), and then incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies (Amersham Biosciences). The sections were examined using a laser-induced fluorescence confocal microscope (Confocal Microscopy Facility, Microscopic Core Facility, University of Wyoming) [13]. The number of primary and secondary myofibers were counted on 10 different microscopic fields of each sample, and a ratio of secondary to primary myofibers was reported. Only those fasciculi for which primary and secondary myofibers were clearly differentiated were counted. The area of 10 fasciculi for each muscle sample was quantified using the ImageJ 1.30v software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed as a complete randomized design using the general linear model of the Statistical Analysis System. The relative density of bands, AMPK activity, total fetal weight, carcass weight, and ratio of secondary to primary myofibers were analyzed. The differences in the mean values were compared by Tukey multiple comparison. Data are presented as the mean and SD (P < 0.05).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The content of mTOR did not differ in fetal muscle in the control-fed and nutrient-restricted groups. However, nutrient restriction resulted in a 43% reduction in phosphorylation of mTOR at Ser2448 in fetuses from nutrient-restricted compared with those from control-fed ewes (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1). Consistent with a role as a downstream target of mTOR, an 18% reduction in phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 was also detected (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2). Both of these findings indicate down-regulation of mTOR signaling in fetal muscle from nutrient-restricted ewes. No significant difference was found in fetal skeletal muscle AMPK activity between fetuses from control-fed and nutrient-restricted ewes (Fig. 3).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. mTOR and phospho-mTOR in longissimus dorsi muscle from fetuses of control-fed (black bars) and nutrient-restricted ewes (white bars) (n=5 per group). A) Representative immunoblots. B) Group mean and SD. *P < 0.05



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Ribosomal protein S6 and phospho-S6 in longissimus dorsi muscle from fetuses of control fed (black bars) and nutrient restricted ewes (white bars; n = 5 per group). A) Representative immunoblots. B) Group mean and SD. *P < 0.05



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Activity of AMPK in fetal skeletal muscle. The activity of AMPK was measured through the specific phosphorylation of SAMS peptide by AMPK in longissimus dorsi muscle from fetuses of control-fed and nutrient-restricted ewes (n = 5 per group). Group mean and SD are reported. *P < 0.05

Calpastain content in fetal muscle from nutrient-restricted ewes was 18% lower than that in fetal muscle from control-fed ewes, but this difference was not significant (Fig. 4). No difference in protein ubiquitylation was detected between the two groups (Fig. 5). These results indicate that maternal nutrient restriction did not cause a significant change in myofiber protein degradation.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Calpastatin content in fetal skeletal muscle. Calpastatin content was measured by immunoblotting in longissimus dorsi muscle from fetuses of control-fed and nutrient-restricted ewes (n = 5 per group, mean ± SD). A) Representative immunoblots. B) Group mean and SD. *P < 0.05



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Content of ubiquitylated proteins in fetal skeletal muscles. Ubiquitylated proteins were detected by immunoblotting in longissimus dorsi muscle from fetuses of control-fed (Con) and nutrient-restricted ewes (NR; n = 5 per group, mean ± SD). A) Representative immunoblots. B) Group mean and SD. *P < 0.05

Decreased activation of mTOR signaling in the fetuses from nutrient-restricted ewes would be expected to reduce skeletal muscle protein synthesis. This was confirmed by a significantly lower carcass weight for fetuses from nutrient restricted ewes (Fig. 6). No significant difference in fetal weight was observed, either between twins and singles or between males and females (data not shown). To show that reduction in fetal carcass weight was related to the retarded muscle development in fetuses from nutrient-restricted ewes, the histochemical structure of fetal muscle was examined.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Carcass weight and empty body weight of fetuses of control-fed (black bars) and nutrient-restricted ewes (white bars; n = 5 per group). Group mean and SD are reported. *P < 0.05

It is difficult to identify myofibers and to differentiate primary and secondary myofibers directly during light microscopy (Fig. 7A). Myofibers were clearly identified and the primary and secondary myofibers differentiated using immunostaining with a myogenin monoclonal antibody and observation under a fluorescent microscope (Fig. 7B). The primary myofibers are large, with a nucleus located at the center of a fasciculus (a single bundle of muscle fibers) that appeared as a dark spot during fluorescent microscopy. Each primary myofiber was surrounded by secondary myofibers, which are smaller in size and contained a peripherally located nucleus (Fig. 7). The numbers of secondary and primary myofibers of fetal muscle from both groups were counted, and the ratio was calculated (Fig. 8). A significantly lower ratio of secondary to primary myofibers was observed in fetal muscle from nutrient-restricted ewes (Fig. 8). Furthermore, the overall sizes of muscle fasciculi were smaller for fetal muscle from nutrient-restricted ewes (P < 0.05) (Fig. 9).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Histochemical examination of fetal muscle. Muscle sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin for standard light microscopy (A) and immunostained by antimyogenin antibody and visualized by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody (B). Arrowhead shows a primary myofiber; arrow shows a secondary myofiber. Magnification, x800



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Ratio of secondary to primary myofibers in fetal muscle. The number of secondary and primary myofibers was counted on 10 different microscopic views of each sample, and the averaged data were used for statistical analysis (n = 5 per group). Group mean and SD are reported. *P < 0.05



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. Average area of fasciculi in fetal muscle. The area of fasciculi was measured using ImageJ 1.30v software. Ten fasciculi were measured for each sample, and the averaged data were used for statistical analysis (n = 5 per group). Group mean and SD are reported. *P < 0.05


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To our knowledge, the effect of precisely controlled maternal nutrient restriction on the development of fetal muscle has not been previously evaluated. In the present study, we determined the effect of 50% maternal nutrient restriction early in gestation on mTOR signaling, the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and muscle development. The mTOR is the main kinase involved in the sensing of nutritional status in cells and coordinating nutrient status with the protein synthesis [6, 8, 9]. The mTOR controls the phosphorylation rate of key proteins, including eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) and ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) [20]. The 4E-BP1 binds to the eIF4E and prevents eIF4E from binding to eIF4G, thereby inhibiting the formation of the active translation complex. The phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 by mTOR abolishes its ability to bind with eIF4E; thus, eIF4E is released to form active translation complexes with eIF4G [2022]. The mTOR can directly phosphorylate S6K, and S6K phosphorylates S6 [6, 23]. Phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 drives translation of a small family of abundant transcripts that encode primarily ribosomal proteins and components of the translational apparatus [23, 24]. Thus, activation of mTOR up-regulates the translational machinery and promotes protein translation [24].

The activity of mTOR is facilitated by phosphorylation at Ser2448 [20]. In a recent study, mTOR was reported to be inhibited by phosphorylation at Thr2446 [25]. The phosphorylations at Ser2448 and Thr2446 are mutually exclusive; the increase in the phosphorylation at Ser2448 decreases the phosphorylation at Thr2446 [25]. Using an antibody specific to the phosphorylation of mTOR at Ser2448, we detected that the phosphorylation of mTOR was reduced in the fetal muscle from nutrient-restricted ewes. This change would be expected to reduce mTOR activity during nutrient restriction. The reduction of phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6, a downstream effector of mTOR, supports this view.

The mTOR phosphorylation at Ser2448 is mediated by AMPK [25]. Thus, the activity of AMPK was further analyzed. A heterotrimeric enzyme containing {alpha}, ß, and {gamma} subunits, AMPK is a critical regulator of energy metabolism [26]. It is activated by an increase in the ratio of AMP to ATP in muscle cells and by phosphorylation at Thr172 [27]. It also is crucial for sensing the energy status of cells. Maternal nutrient restriction would tend to increase the AMP content in muscle cells and, thus, to activate AMPK. However, no significant difference in AMPK activity was detected. A possible reason for this lack of difference might be the fact that this level of maternal nutrient restriction did not impair the level of energy delivery severely enough to activate the AMPK activity in fetal muscle.

Protein degradation in muscle is largely controlled by the calpain and ubiquitin-proteasome systems. The calpain system is mainly comprised of calpain I, calpain II, and calpastatin. We have shown that calpastatin is slightly down-regulated in the skeletal muscle of pregnant cows when their diet was similarly nutrient restricted by 50% and up-regulated in the fetuses [13]. In the present sheep study, maternal nutrient restriction did not alter fetal muscle calpastatin. Furthermore, no difference in the ubiquitylation of proteins in the fetal muscle of control-fed and nutrient-restricted animals was detected. These data suggest that little or no difference exists in protein degradation between control-fed and nutrient-restricted fetuses. This is consistent with a former report concerning tumor-bearing pregnant rats, in which significant muscle wasting was observed in the mother but not in the fetus [28]. Thus, maternal nutrient restriction appears to have a greater effect in the inhibition of protein accretion than in the degradation of existing protein in fetal muscle. As a result, the total weight and empty body weight of fetuses from nutrient-restricted ewes were reduced, which is consistent with retarded development of both the skeletal muscle and the skeleton of fetuses.

Muscle cells at this stage of development expresses myogenin [29, 30]; we immunostained those tissue sections with antimyogenin antibody to clearly identify myofibers. Identification is difficult with conventional hematoxylin-eosin stain. During fluorescent microscopy, muscle cells were easily identified. Differentiation of primary and secondary myofibers also was facilitated by the presence of a centrally localized nucleus in primary myofibers and a central location of the fibers themselves within fasciculi. Maternal nutrient restriction significantly reduced the ratio of secondary to primary muscle fibers, and the size of fasciculi was smaller in the muscle of fetuses from nutrient-restricted ewes. This finding agrees with reports concerning other species. In the pig, undernutrition in utero results in low birth weight and decreased number of muscle fibers. The progeny of undernourished sows had a significantly lower ratio of secondary to primary myofibers [31]. In guinea pig fetuses, a similar reduction in fiber number was observed in fetuses that were undernourished in utero [32]. The difference in the number of secondary myofibers is related to the differences in mTOR signaling. Activation of mTOR increases the expression of cyclin D1, CDK1, and CDC25A, and it promotes the G1 cell-cycle progression [33]. The decrease in mTOR signaling in the muscle of fetuses from nutrient-restricted ewes is consistent with decreased proliferation of progenitor cells and myoblasts and reduction in the number of secondary myofibers in fetal muscle.

The reduction in the number of myofibers in fetal skeletal muscle following maternal nutrient restriction will likely result in physiological consequences during postnatal life. Skeletal muscle is the primary tissue for the utilization of glucose and fatty acids [34, 35]. As a result, reduced muscle mass will decrease the metabolism of glucose and fatty acids in response to insulin stimuli and, thus, will predispose offspring of nutrient-restricted mothers to diabetes and obesity. Human infants who are small at birth have a greater risk for type 2 diabetes [3638]. Decreased muscle mass is a major factor in low birth weight [36, 39].

In conclusion, mTOR signaling in fetal muscle was down-regulated following maternal nutrient restriction. This down-regulation of mTOR signaling was associated with a reduced ratio of secondary to primary muscle fibers in the muscle of fetuses from nutrient-restricted ewes. Critical factors that regulate degradation of proteins in fetal muscle were not significantly affected by the level of nutrient restriction imposed. Because the number of muscle fibers is determined by prenatal development, the reduced number of muscle fibers in fetuses exposed to undernutrition will likely have long-term implications for postnatal health.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The monoclonal antibody developed by Dr. Woodring E. Wright was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, developed under Department of Biological Sciences (Iowa City, IA). The authors thank Dr. Nor Kalchayanand and Mrs. Carole Hertz for technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by National Research Initiative Competitive Grant 2003-35206-12814 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service and a grant from NIH-HD21350. Back

2 Correspondence: Min Du, Department of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071. FAX: 307 766 2355; mindu{at}uwyo.edu Back

Received: 21 July 2004.

First decision: 6 August 2004.

Accepted: 11 August 2004.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Nissen PM, Danielsen VO, Jorgensen PF, Oksbjerg N. Increased maternal nutrition of sows has no beneficial effects on muscle fiber number or postnatal growth and has no impact on the meat quality of the offspring. J Anim Sci 2003 81:3018-3027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Greenwood PL, Hunt AS, Hermanson JW, Bell AW. Effects of birth weight and postnatal nutrition on neonatal sheep: II. Skeletal muscle growth and development. J Anim Sci 2000 78:50-61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Beermann DH, Cassens RG, Hausman GJ. A second look at fiber type differentiation in porcine skeletal muscle. J Anim Sci 1978 46:125-132
  4. Swatland HJ. Muscle growth in the fetal and neonatal pig. J Anim Sci 1973 37:536-545
  5. King JC. The risk of maternal nutritional depletion and poor outcomes increases in early or closely spaced pregnancies. J Nutr 2003 133:1732S-1736S[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bodine SC, Stitt TN, Gonzalez M, Kline WO, Stover GL, Bauerlein R, Zlotchenko E, Scrimgeour A, Lawrence JC, Glass DJ, Yancopoulos GD. Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 2001 3:1014-1019[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Pallafacchina G, Calabria E, Serrano AL, Kalhovde JM, Schiaffino S. A protein kinase B-dependent and rapamycin-sensitive pathway controls skeletal muscle growth but not fiber type specification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002 99:9213-9218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Sakamoto K, Aschenbach WG, Hirshman MF, Goodyear LJ. Akt signaling in skeletal muscle: regulation by exercise and passive stretch. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2003 285:E1081-E1088[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bolster DR, Kubica N, Crozier SJ, Williamson DL, Farrell PA, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS. Immediate response of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated signaling following acute resistance exercise in rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol 2003 553:213-220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gaben AM, Saucier C, Bedin M, Barbu V, Mester J. Rapamycin inhibits cdk4 activation, p 21(WAF1/CIP1) expression and G1-phase progression in transformed mouse fibroblasts. Int J Cancer 2004 108:200-206[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Hashemolhosseini S, Nagamine Y, Morley SJ, Desrivieres S, Mercep L, Ferrari S. Rapamycin inhibition of the G1 to S transition is mediated by effects on cyclin D1 mRNA and protein stability. J Biol Chem 1998 273:14424-14429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Erbay E, Park IH, Nuzzi PD, Schoenherr CJ, Chen J. IGF-II transcription in skeletal myogenesis is controlled by mTOR and nutrients. J Cell Biol 2003 163:931-936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Du M, Zhu MJ, Means WJ, Hess BW, Ford SP. Effect of nutrient restriction on calpain and calpastatin content of skeletal muscle from cows and fetuses. J Anim Sci 2004; 82:2541–2547
  14. Vonnahme KA, Hess BW, Hansen TR, McCormick RJ, Rule DC, Moss GE, Murdoch WJ, Nijland MJ, Skinner DC, Nathanielsz PW, Ford SP. Maternal undernutrition from early to mid-gestation leads to growth retardation, cardiac ventricular hypertrophy, and increased liver weight in the fetal sheep. Biol Reprod 2003 69:133-140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep, 6th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1985
  16. Sanson DW, West TR, Tatman WR, Riley ML, Judkins MB, Moss GE. Relationship of body composition of mature ewes with condition score and body weight. J Anim Sci 1993 71:1112-1116[Abstract]
  17. Helman EE, Huff-Lonergan E, Davenport GM, Lonergan SM. Effect of dietary protein on calpastatin in canine skeletal muscle. J Anim Sci 2003 81:2199-2205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Du M, Hao L, Lopez-Campistrous A, Fernandez-Patron C. Agonist-induced activation of matrix metalloproteinase-7 promotes vasoconstriction through the epidermal growth factor-receptor pathway. Circ Res 2004; 94:68–76
  19. Davies SP, Carling D, Hardie DG. Tissue distribution of the AMP-activated protein kinase, and lack of activation by cyclic-AMP-dependent protein kinase, studied using a specific and sensitive peptide assay. Eur J Biochem 1989 186:123-128[Medline]
  20. Hara K, Maruki Y, Long X, Yoshino K, Oshiro N, Hidayat S, Tokunaga C, Avruch J, Yonezawa K. Raptor, a binding partner of target of rapamycin (TOR), mediates TOR action. Cell 2002 110:177-189[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Kimball SR, Farrell PA, Jefferson LS. Invited review: role of insulin in translational control of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by amino acids or exercise. J Appl Physiol 2002 93:1168-1180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kimball SR, Jurasinski CV, Lawrence JC Jr, Jefferson LS. Insulin stimulates protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by enhancing the association of eIF-4E and eIF-4G. Am J Physiol 1997 272:C754-C759
  23. Jefferies HB, Fumagalli S, Dennis PB, Reinhard C, Pearson RB, Thomas G. Rapamycin suppresses 5'TOP mRNA translation through inhibition of p70s6k. EMBO J 1997 16:3693-3704[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Schmelzle T, Hall MN. TOR, a central controller of cell growth. Cell 2000 103:253-262[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Cheng SW, Fryer LG, Carling D, Shepherd PR. Thr2446 is a novel mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) phosphorylation site regulated by nutrient status. J Biol Chem 2004 279:15719-15722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kim J, Solis RS, Arias EB, Cartee GD. Postcontraction insulin sensitivity: relationship with contraction protocol, glycogen concentration, and 5' AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation. J Appl Physiol 2004 96:575-583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sakamoto K, Goransson O, Hardie DG, Alessi DR. Activity of LKB1 and AMPK-related kinases in skeletal muscle: effects of contraction, phenformin, and AICAR. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2004; 287: E310–317
  28. Carbo N, Costelli P, Lopez-Soriano FJ, Argiles JM. Tumor growth influences skeletal muscle protein turnover in the pregnant rat. Pediatr Res 1998 43:250-255[Medline]
  29. Crosier AE, Farin CE, Rodriguez KF, Blondin P, Alexander JE, Farin PW. Development of skeletal muscle and expression of candidate genes in bovine fetuses from embryos produced in vivo or in vitro. Biol Reprod 2002 67:401-408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Buckingham M, Bajard L, Chang T, Daubas P, Hadchouel J, Meilhac S, Montarras D, Rocancourt D, Relaix F. The formation of skeletal muscle: from somite to limb. J Anat 2003 202:59-68[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Dwyer CM, Stickland NC, Fletcher JM. The influence of maternal nutrition on muscle fiber number development in the porcine fetus and on subsequent postnatal growth. J Anim Sci 1994 72:911-917[Abstract]
  32. Ward SS, Stickland NC. Why are slow and fast muscles differentially affected during prenatal undernutrition?. Muscle Nerve 1991 14:259-267[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Gao N, Flynn DC, Zhang Z, Zhong XS, Walker V, Liu KJ, Shi X, Jiang BH. The G1 cell-cycle progression and the expression of G1 cyclins are regulated by PI3K/AKT/mTOR/p70S6K1 signaling in human ovarian cancer cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2004; 287:C281– 291
  34. Guo Z, Zhou L. Evidence for increased and insulin-resistant lipolysis in skeletal muscle of high-fat-fed rats. Metabolism 2004 53:794-798[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Krebs M, Roden M. Nutrient-induced insulin resistance in human skeletal muscle. Curr Med Chem 2004 11:901-908[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Eriksson JG, Yliharsila H, Forsen T, Osmond C, Barker DJ. Exercise protects against glucose intolerance in individuals with a small body size at birth. Prev Med 2004 39:164-167[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Forsen T, Eriksson J, Tuomilehto J, Reunanen A, Osmond C, Barker D. The fetal and childhood growth of persons who develop type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 2000 133:176-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Harding JE. Nutrition and growth before birth. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2003 12:SupplS28
  39. Hediger ML, Overpeck MD, Kuczmarski RJ, McGlynn A, Maurer KR, Davis WW. Muscularity and fatness of infants and young children born small- or large-for-gestational-age. Pediatrics 1998 102:E60



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. Tong, M. J. Zhu, K. R. Underwood, B. W. Hess, S. P. Ford, and M. Du
AMP-activated protein kinase and adipogenesis in sheep fetal skeletal muscle and 3T3-L1 cells
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2008; 86(6): 1296 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. J. Zhu, B. Han, J. Tong, C. Ma, J. M. Kimzey, K. R. Underwood, Y. Xiao, B. W. Hess, S. P. Ford, P. W. Nathanielsz, et al.
AMP-activated protein kinase signalling pathways are down regulated and skeletal muscle development impaired in fetuses of obese, over-nourished sheep
J. Physiol., May 15, 2008; 586(10): 2651 - 2664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. J. Forhead, C. A. Lamb, K. L. Franko, D. M. O'Connor, F. B. P. Wooding, R. L. Cripps, S. Ozanne, D. Blache, Q. W. Shen, M. Du, et al.
Role of leptin in the regulation of growth and carbohydrate metabolism in the ovine fetus during late gestation
J. Physiol., May 1, 2008; 586(9): 2393 - 2403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
X. Yang, C. Yang, A. Farberman, T. C. Rideout, C. F. M. de Lange, J. France, and M. Z. Fan
The mammalian target of rapamycin-signaling pathway in regulating metabolism and growth
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E36 - E50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
Z. C. T. R. Daniel, J. M. Brameld, J. Craigon, N. D. Scollan, and P. J. Buttery
Effect of maternal dietary restriction during pregnancy on lamb carcass characteristics and muscle fiber composition
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1565 - 1576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. Du, Q. W. Shen, M. J. Zhu, and S. P. Ford
Leucine stimulates mammalian target of rapamycin signaling in C2C12 myoblasts in part through inhibition of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 919 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. J. Zhu, S. P. Ford, W. J. Means, B. W. Hess, P. W. Nathanielsz, and M. Du
Maternal nutrient restriction affects properties of skeletal muscle in offspring
J. Physiol., August 15, 2006; 575(1): 241 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
L. J. Van Winkle, J. K. Tesch, A. Shah, and A. L. Campione
System B0,+ amino acid transport regulates the penetration stage of blastocyst implantation with possible long-term developmental consequences through adulthood
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2006; 12(2): 145 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
C. A Maloney and W. D Rees
Gene-nutrient interactions during fetal development
Reproduction, October 1, 2005; 130(4): 401 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/6/1968    most recent
biolreprod.104.034561v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS