Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print September 22, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.033324
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
72/1/179    most recent
biolreprod.104.033324v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Baltz, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Baltz, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hadi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Baltz, J. M.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 72, 179–187 (2005)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.033324
© 2005 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Similar Effects of Osmolarity, Glucose, and Phosphate on Cleavage past the 2-Cell Stage in Mouse Embryos from Outbred and F1 Hybrid Females1

Timin Hadi3, Mary-Anne Hammer3, Carolyn Algire3, Tiffany Richards6, and Jay M. Baltz2,3,4,5

Hormones, Growth and Development Program,3 Ottawa Health Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Division of Reproductive Medicine),4 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine,5 Department of Biology,6 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4E9


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
One-cell-stage embryos derived from most random-bred and inbred female mice exhibit an in vitro developmental block at the two-cell stage in classical embryo culture media. However, embryos derived from many F1 hybrids develop easily past the two-cell stage under the same conditions. This has given rise to the commonly accepted idea that there exist blocking and nonblocking types of female mice, with only the former being prone to a two-cell block. Recently, culture media have been improved to the point that even embryos prone to the two-cell block will develop past the block in vitro, making it possible to study its etiology. Here, we show that either increased osmolarity or increased glucose/phosphate levels induced the expected two-cell block in random-bred CF1 embryos and the two-cell block at increased osmolarities could be rescued by the organic osmolyte glycine. Surprisingly, one-cell embryos from B6D2F1 (BDF1) F1 hybrid females, considered to be nonblocking, also became blocked at the two-cell stage when osmolarity or glucose/phosphate levels were increased. They were also similarly rescued by glycine from the osmolarity-induced block. The most evident difference was that the purportedly nonblocking embryos became blocked at a higher threshold of osmolarity or glucose/phosphate level than those considered prone to this developmental block. Thus, both blocking and nonblocking embryos actually exhibit a similar two-cell block to development.

conceptus, embryo, environment


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our ability to produce embryos in vitro has greatly improved over the nearly 50 yr since Whitten first cultured eight-cell-stage mouse embryos to blastocysts in a simple defined medium [1]. As media subsequently were improved and it became possible to culture embryos from earlier stages, it became clear that embryos derived from females of most types of mice would not develop from the fertilized egg past the two-cell stage in vitro, although development to the two-cell stage was apparently unimpeded and two-cell embryos produced in vivo developed easily to blastocysts in vitro [2]. This phenomenon of a specific in vitro developmental arrest at the two-cell stage became known as the two-cell block. The two-cell-block phenomenon was defined functionally as the inability of fertilized eggs to develop in vitro past the two-cell stage in media that nonetheless supported both development up to the two-cell stage and development of in vivo-produced two-cell embryos to blastocysts [2]. A key feature of the two-cell block is that it is dependent on the genotype of the female that gave rise to the egg [3]. Mice were thus divided into blocking and nonblocking types, based on whether eggs derived from the females exhibited the two-cell block in traditional culture media, although some, such as those from CD1 outbred females, exhibited a partial block [4]. In general, inbred and outbred mice were found to be blocking or partially blocking, while hybrids between different inbred strains were nonblocking [2, 3]. Whether embryos were blocking or nonblocking appeared to be an intrinsic property of the egg because transferring cytoplasm from a nonblocking egg to one from a blocking type of female abolished the two-cell block [5]. It is thus almost universally accepted that most genotypes of mice are prone to the two-cell block, while some privileged types, mainly hybrids derived from crosses between inbred strains, do not exhibit the two-cell block at all. Similar blocks to development appear in other species, including humans at the four- to eight-cell stages, and, as in the mouse, these are generally correlated with the stage of embryo development where expression of the embryonic genome begins. It is only in the mouse, however, where a large array of well-characterized outbred, inbred, and hybrid mice is widely available that the genotype of the mother has been demonstrated conclusively to determine whether the embryo is susceptible to a developmental block in vitro.

Recently, media have been developed in which even blocking-type mouse embryos will develop from the fertilized egg to the blastocyst stage. The first of these were CZB, a medium developed by Chatot et al. [6] and the simplex-optimized media (SOM) [7], of which KSOM, a version with increased K+ [8], was the most successful. The development of media permitting blocking embryos to develop from the fertilized egg to the blastocyst stage in vitro has allowed the identification of several physicochemical properties that are implicated in the two-cell block. The main changes in these media that led to relief of the two-cell block were a decrease in NaCl concentration and overall osmolarity, an altered pyruvate:lactate ratio, the addition of EDTA and glutamine, and optimized concentrations of the other components, including lowered glucose and phosphate [2].

Of these, one of the best studied has been osmolarity and increased salt concentration [9]. It is now well established that the two-cell block can be alleviated by decreasing the osmolarity of the medium [911]. Importantly, the block can also be overcome by including compounds in the medium that function as organic osmolytes that support maintenance of cell volume without severely perturbing cell biochemistry, in contrast with osmotically equivalent amounts of inorganic ions [12]. A number of compounds can serve as organic osmolytes in embryos, protecting them against increased osmolarity [1013], one of the most effective of which is glycine [13, 14]. Recently, it has been found that osmotically regulated glycine accumulation by embryos is mediated by the GLYT1 glycine transporter, a member of the neurotransmitter transporter family. In early preimplantation mouse embryos, GLYT1 has a previously unreported function as a cell-volume-regulatory organic osmolyte transporter, explaining how glycine exerts its osmoprotective effect and mediates release from the two-cell block [15].

It is puzzling, however, that only embryos from certain genotypes of female mice seem to be subject to the two-cell block. If the block can be induced by something as fundamental as preventing normal cell volume regulation or perturbing metabolism, it would seem that it should occur in all embryos regardless of genotype. An alternate explanation, which is that all mouse embryos are susceptible to the two-cell block but that the threshold at which it is induced varies among genotypes, has not been adequately considered. We therefore hypothesized that the two-cell block is not restricted to particular mouse genotypes but is instead a general phenomenon to which they have varying susceptibility. The experiments reported here were designed to test this hypothesis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chemicals and Media

All chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise noted and were embryo-culture grade or cell-culture grade. Some media used were based on KSOM embryo culture medium [8], except that glutamine (which can function as an organic osmolyte in embryos [12]) was omitted, and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA; 1 mg/ml) replaced BSA as the macromolecular component of the medium. Thus, the components of the KSOM medium used here were (in mM) NaCl (95), KCl (2.5), KH2PO4 (0.35), MgSO4·7H2O (0.2), Na lactate (10), glucose (0.2), Na pyruvate (0.2), NaHCO3 (25), CaCl2 (1.7), EDTA (0.01), K penicillin G (0.16), streptomycin (0.03). Other media were based on mMTF, a medium developed by Gardner and Lane based on measured concentrations of components in mouse tubal fluid [16], again with BSA replaced by PVA. This mMTF medium contained (in mM) NaCl (103), KCl (4.8), KH2PO4 (1.2), MgSO4·7H2O (1.2), Na lactate (4.8), glucose (3.4), Na pyruvate (0.37), NaHCO3 (25), CaCl2 (1.7), EDTA (0), K penicillin G (0.16), and streptomycin (0.03). Other modifications to media were made as described in the Results. To adjust osmolarity, appropriate amounts of the trisaccharide D(+) raffinose, which is not transported nor metabolized by mammalian cells, were added as previously described [12]; osmolarity of KSOM with no added raffinose was 250 mOsM, while osmolarity of mMTF was 270 mOsM. Osmolarities were confirmed using a vapor-pressure osmometer (model 5520; Wescor, Logan, UT). For flushing zygotes from the oviduct, modified Hepes-KSOM [8] was used in which glutamine was omitted and BSA replaced by PVA, as above.

Embryos and Culture

All mice were obtained from Charles River Canada (St-Constant, PQ). Their use in these experiments was approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Ottawa Health Research Institute (protocol 2003003) and followed the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Blocking embryos were obtained from female outbred CF1 mice. KSOM medium has been reported to support development of CF1-derived fertilized eggs past the two-cell stage [8], while, in contrast, embryos from these outbred mice have been reported to block completely at the two-cell stage in many media including mMTF [2, 16]. Nonblocking embryos were obtained from female B6D2F1 (referred to throughout as BDF1), which are F1 hybrid offspring of inbred C57Bl/6 females and DBA/2 males. To obtain embryos, females were superovulated by intraperitoneal injection of 5 IU eCG followed 47.5 h later by 5 IU hCG. Immediately after hCG injection, the females of either type were caged with BDF1 males overnight. Female mice were killed by cervical dislocation, and fertilized eggs (obtained approximately 20–22 h post-hCG) or two-cell embryos (44–46 h post-hCG) were removed from the excised oviducts by flushing with Hepes-KSOM. For eggs, 300 µg/ml hyaluronidase was added to remove adherent cumulus. Normal fertilization of eggs was confirmed by the presence of two pronuclei. Embryos were cultured in groups of 15 according to standard techniques, in microdrop cultures under mineral oil (Sigma or Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI) at 37°C in 5% CO2:air.

Data Analysis

For embryo culture experiments, development from fertilized eggs was recorded each day for 6 days, with the day on which eggs were obtained designated as Day 1 (1 day post-hCG). Development of in vivo-produced two-cell embryos was recorded each day for 5 days, with the day two-cell embryos were obtained designated as Day 2 (2 days post-hCG). Data are presented as the percentage of embryos reaching the two-cell stage on Day 2, the four-cell or greater stage on Day 3, the morula stage on Day 4, and the blastocyst stage on Days 5 and 6 post-hCG. Replicates consisted of individual groups of 15 embryos obtained on separate days and cultured under the same conditions. Data are presented as the percentage ± SEM of replicates to allow visual comparisons, but this SEM was not used for statistical comparison of these response data. Instead, for statistical comparisons, data were expressed as the inverse sine of the fraction of embryos in each replicate reaching the specified stage.

For data in which each treatment group was essentially independent and could be considered categorical (data in Figs. 1, 2, 5, and 8), one-way ANOVA was used to determine if there was significant variance above that expected by chance, which, if found, was then followed by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test to perform pairwise comparisons between individual means (InStat, GraphPad Software, San Diego). Thus, the significance of differences between each pair of individual treatment groups was obtained. Data that were instead best described by two independent variables (data in Figs. 4, 6, and 7), where one variable was categorical (female genotype, i.e., CF1 or BDF1) and one continuous (i.e., osmolarity or glucose/phosphate levels), were tested by a two-factor ANOVA (Microsoft Excel and Vista Visual Statistics System, F.W. Young, L.L. Thurston Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC). Here, whether the main effect of each independent variable is significant can be determined, but it is not possible to test for significant differences between individual points. Finally, data in which there were three independent variables (Fig. 3; one categorical, female genotype [CF1 or BDF1], and two continuous, glycine level and osmolarity) were assessed by univariate analysis with ANOVA assuming a linear model for dependence on the variables (SPSS 12.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Again, whether the main effect of each independent variable is significant can be determined, but it is not possible to test for significant differences between individual points. Analyses of such embryo development data have previously been described in detail by Lawitts and Biggers [17]. Graphs are presented with superscripts to indicate differences between treatment groups when each group was considered independent and post hoc tests could be used. Where the data were considered to depend on continuous variables, graphs show only the data with the significance of the main effects of each independent variable given in the text.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Comparison of embryo development from fertilized eggs derived from CF1 or BDF1 females in KSOM versus mMTF media. Percent development of fertilized eggs is shown in KSOM (A, B) or mMTF (C, D) as indicated at the top for BDF1-derived (A, C) and CF1-derived (B, D) fertilized eggs, as indicated at the right. Stages of development are indicated at the bottom (2c = two-cell; 4c = four-cell or greater; M = morula; Bl 5 = blastocyst on Day 5; Bl 6 = blastocyst on Day 6; see text). Significant differences between development to a particular stage (between panels) is indicated by different letters (P < 0.05). No comparison was done between stages of development (i.e., within a panel). N = 5 replicates with 15 eggs per replicate except for C (N = 4)



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Effect of osmolarity and presence of glycine on development of CF1-derived fertilized eggs in KSOM medium. Percent development is shown in 250 mOsM medium (A), 310 mOsM medium (B), and 310 mOsM medium with 1 mM glycine (C). Significant differences between development to a particular stage (between panels) is indicated by different letters (P < 0.05). No comparison was done between stages of development (i.e., within a panel). Stages of development are indicated at the bottom (2c = two-cell; 4c = four-cell or greater; M = morula; Bl 5 = blastocyst on Day 5; Bl 6 = blastocyst on Day 6; see text). The presence of 1 mM glycine is indicated by +gly (C). N = 6–7 replicates of 15 eggs each



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Development of CF1-derived fertilized eggs in modified mMTF media. Development of fertilized eggs derived from CF1 females is shown to the two-cell (A), four-cell or greater (B), morula (C), and blastocyst stages on Day 5 (D) and Day 6 (E). Media were KSOM, mMTF, or modifications of mMTF, with the components and their concentrations, as well as medium osmolarity, indicated at bottom. The first two bars at left are KSOM and mMTF media, as indicated at bottom. The components of the media shown at left were adjusted from the concentration found in mMTF (second bar from left) to that of KSOM (first bar at left), as described in the text. Where concentrations are in bold, they are identical to those of KSOM; where they are in normal text, they are those in mMTF. In all media except KSOM, mMTF, and the bar furthest to the right, raffinose was added to maintain osmolarity at 270 mOsM, as indicated. Letters above bars indicate significant difference within each panel (bars which do not share the same letter differ by P < 0.05). The stage of development is indicated in each panel (2c = two-cell; 4c = four-cell or greater; M = morula; Bl 5 = blastocyst on Day 5; Bl 6 = blastocyst on Day 6; see text). N = 5 replicates of 15 eggs each



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Two-cell block phenomenon in CF1- and BDF1-derived embryos. A) Development of CF1- and BDF1-derived embryos is shown for CF1 at 310 mOsM and BDF1 at 330 mOsM, obtained from the data in Figures 3 and 4. Percent development of fertilized eggs to the two-cell stage (1c to 2c; after 1 day in culture) and to the four-cell or greater stage (1c to 4c; after 2 days in culture), and of in vivo-derived two-cell embryos to the four-cell or greater stage (2c to 4c; after 1 day in culture) or morula stage (2c to M; after 2 days in culture) is plotted. For each female genotype (CF1 or BDF1), letters indicate significant difference between extent of development (plain letters refer to CF1 development, while those marked as prime refer to BDF1; significance tested by ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer test after inverse sine transformation; P < 0.05; differences between female genotype were not compared). B) Development of CF1- and BDF1-derived embryos is shown for CF1 at 2x glucose and phosphate and BDF1 at 4x, obtained from the data in Figures 6 and 7. Labels and statistical comparisons are as described in A. In both cases (A and B), much lower development was seen only for fertilized eggs developing to the four-cell stage. Development of fertilized eggs to the two-cell stage and of in vivo-produced two-cell embryos was much less severely affected in the same media. Although a greater level of perturbation was required to produce this pattern for BDF1- than CF1-derived embryos (i.e., 330 versus 310 mOsM in A and 4x versus 2x glucose/phosphate in B), the pattern of development was very similar for both female genotypes (CF1 or BDF1), indicative of a two-cell block



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Development of in vivo-derived two-cell embryos as a function of osmolarity. Development of two-cell embryos derived from BDF1 and CF1 females is shown (indicated by key) to the four-cell or greater stage (A), morula (B), and blastocyst stage on Day 5 (C) and Day 6 (D). Osmolarity was varied using raffinose to obtain osmolarities shown on the horizontal axis. The stage of development is indicated in each panel (4c = four-cell or greater; M = morula; Bl 5 = blastocyst on day 5; Bl 6 = blastocyst on Day 6; see text). N = 5 replicates of 15 eggs each for both female genotypes (CF1 and BDF1). See text for data analysis



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Effect of increased glucose and phosphate on development of fertilized eggs. Development of fertilized eggs derived from BDF1 and CF1 females is shown (indicated by key) to the two-cell (A), four-cell or greater (B), morula (C), and blastocyst stages on Day 5 (D) and Day 6 (E). Media were modified mMTF in which the KCl, MgSO4, glucose and phosphate concentrations had been altered to those of KSOM (K), and in which glucose and phosphate were simultaneously increased to one-, two-, and fourfold the level in mMTF (1x, 2x, and 4x, respectively), as described in the text. The stage of development is indicated in each panel (2c = two-cell; 4c = four-cell or greater; M = morula; Bl 5 = blastocyst on Day 5; Bl 6 = blastocyst on Day 6; see text). N = 5 replicates of 15 eggs each for both female genotypes (CF1 and BDF1). See text for data analysis



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Effect of increased glucose and phosphate on development of in vivo-derived two-cell embryos. Development of in vivo-derived two-cell embryos from BDF1 and CF1 females (indicated by key) was determined in modified mMTF media (as in Fig. 6) with two- and fourfold levels of glucose and phosphate in mMTF (2x and 4x, respectively). The stage of development is indicated in each panel (4c = four-cell or greater; M = morula; Bl 5 = blastocyst on Day 5; Bl 6 = blastocyst on Day 6; see text). N = 5 replicates of 15 eggs each for both female genotypes (CF1 or BDF1). See text for data analysis



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Development of fertilized eggs as a function of osmolarity in the presence or absence of glycine. Development of fertilized eggs derived from BDF1 and CF1 females is shown (indicated by key) to the two-cell (A), four-cell or greater (B), morula (C), and blastocyst stages on Day 5 (D) and Day 6 (E). Osmolarity was varied using raffinose to obtain osmolarities shown on the horizontal axis. Glycine was present (1 mM) or absent, as indicated by the key. The stage of development is indicated in each panel (2c = two-cell; 4c = four-cell or greater; M = morula; Bl 5 = blastocyst on Day 5; Bl 6 = blastocyst on Day 6; see text). N = 5 replicates of 15 eggs each for both female genotypes (CF1 or BDF1) and both levels of glycine. See text for data analysis


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Confirmation of Blocking and Nonblocking Embryos

To confirm that the putative blocking and nonblocking embryos that we used here behaved as expected, fertilized eggs derived from CF1 or BDF1 females were cultured in parallel in either KSOM or mMTF medium. In KSOM, virtually all embryos from either CF1 or BDF1 females developed past the two-cell stage to the four-cell stage (Fig. 1, A and B; P > 0.05 for CF1 versus BDF1). In mMTF, almost all BDF1-derived embryos also developed past the two-cell stage (Fig. 1C; P > 0.05 versus either CF1 or BDF1 in KSOM). In contrast, embryos from CF1 females were nearly all blocked at the two-cell stage in mMTF, with fewer than 10% reaching the four-cell stage (Fig. 1D; P < 0.001 versus the other three cases). This confirmed that the two-cell block occurs in CF1 embryos but not BDF1 embryos in mMTF, while both will develop past the two-cell stage in KSOM, as expected.

A high proportion of embryos continued to develop to the blastocyst stage in KSOM medium for embryos from both female genotypes (CF1 or BDF1). However, development of CF1 embryos in KSOM seemed to be somewhat slower that that of BDF1 embryos because there was a trend toward a higher proportion of BDF1 embryos reaching the blastocyst stage by Day 5 in culture than CF1 embryos (although the difference did not reach significance), even though the final proportions reaching the blastocyst stage became nearly identical by Day 6 (Fig. 1, A and B; P < 0.05).

In mMTF medium, virtually no CF1 embryos reached the blastocyst stage, as expected from their poor development past the two-cell stage (Fig. 1D). Even BDF1 embryos, however, developed relatively poorly in mMTF medium compared with KSOM (Fig. 1C; P < 0.05 for blastocysts on Day 5, P < 0.01 on Day 6), with only about half the proportion of blastocysts forming in mMTF as in KSOM, even though transit through the two-cell block was nearly complete.

Thus, the two-cell block phenomenon can be clearly demonstrated to occur in CF1 but not BDF1 embryos in the blocking medium, mMTF. However, it is also clear that subsequent development of even nonblocking BDF1 embryos is compromised in mMTF.

A Two-Cell Block Can Be Induced in CF1 Embryos by Increased Osmolarity and Rescued by Glycine

A two-cell block can be induced in CF1 embryos cultured in KSOM simply by increasing the osmolarity of this medium [9, 12]. Almost all embryos reached the two-cell stage at 250 or 310 mOsM (100% and 99%, respectively). At 310 mOsM with glycine present, there was a small decrease in development to the two-cell stage (95%). When the osmolarity of KSOM was increased here from 250 to 310 mOsM by adding raffinose, more than 80% of embryos cultured from fertilized eggs became arrested at the two-cell stage (Fig. 2, A and B; P < 0.001 for development to the four-cell stage at 310 versus 250 mOsM). As previously shown [12, 15], glycine added to 310-mOsM medium was able to rescue development past the two-cell stage (Fig. 2C; development to the four-cell stage was not significantly different from development at 250 mOsM). Development to the blastocyst stage occurred at a high proportion for CF1 embryos cultured in KSOM at 250 mOsM, but was almost completely abolished at 310 mOsM (Fig. 2, A and B; P < 0.001). As expected, glycine substantially rescued development to the blastocyst stage at 310 mOsM (P < 0.01 versus without glycine), although it did not completely restore the levels supported at 250 mOsM (Fig. 2C). Thus, we confirmed that development of CF1-derived embryos can be blocked at the two-cell stage in KSOM medium by increasing its osmolarity.

Comparison of the Response of CF1 and BDF1 Embryos Cultured from Fertilized Eggs to Increased Osmolarity and Glycine

We next compared the effects of increasing osmolarity of KSOM medium on CF1- and BDF1-derived embryo development from fertilized eggs. Development from the one- to two-cell stages occurred at nearly 100% in KSOM at osmolarities up to 370 mOsM in embryos from both female genotypes (Fig. 3A). BDF1-derived embryos were somewhat more resistant to further increases in osmolarity than CF1, as can be seen most clearly by their substantially better development at 390 mOsM. Above this level, embryos of either type arrested at the one-cell stage, so that virtually no cleavage to the two-cell stage occurred at 410 mOsM or above. In embryos from both female genotypes (CF1 or BDF1), the presence of glycine rescued development from the one- to two-cell stage, so that deleterious effects were not evident below 430 mOsM in the presence of glycine, with cleavage to the two-cell stage substantially decreased only at 450 mOsM and above (Fig. 3A). The main effects of osmolarity, female genotype (CF1 or BDF1), and glycine on development to the two-cell stage were highly significant (P < 10–5 for each).

Further development past the two-cell stage to the four-cell stage was much more sensitive to increased osmolarity. CF1-derived embryos were blocked at the two-cell stage above about 290 mOsM, while glycine was able to rescue development up to about 350 mOsM. BDF1-derived embryos became blocked at the two-cell stage at osmolarities of 310 mOsM and above (Fig. 3B). Like CF1-derived embryos, development of BDF1-derived embryos was rescued by glycine, with the range of osmolarity that permitted development past the two-cell stage being extended by 60– 70 mOsM for both embryo types in the presence of glycine (Fig. 3B). The main effects of osmolarity, female genotype (CF1 or BDF1), and glycine on development past the two-cell stage to at least the four-cell stage were highly significant (P < 10–6 for each).

Subsequent development followed a similar pattern (Fig. 3, C–E), with BDF1-derived embryos continuing to exhibit better development at higher osmolarities than CF1-derived embryos. Another effect, wherein glycine exerted a deleterious effect on development of CF1-derived embryos at low osmolarities, was also evident. The etiology of this is unknown, but it has been previously shown to be reversed by preventing glycine import into the embryo [15], and thus may be due to excessive displacement of inorganic ions from the cytoplasm by accumulated glycine. Again, the main effects of osmolarity, female genotype (CF1 or BDF1), and glycine on development to the morula or blastocyst on Day 5 or 6 were highly significant (P < 10–6 for each).

Comparison of the Response of CF1 and BDF1 In Vivo-Produced Two-Cell Embryos to Increased Osmolarity

We then performed similar experiments, but instead beginning with two-cell embryos that had been produced in vivo and removed from the female tract at the late two-cell stage (Fig. 4). Again, for each stage of development, the effect of osmolarity on development was highly significant (P < 10–8). After 1 day in culture, CF1-derived embryos developed to at least the four-cell stage at osmolarities up to 330 mOsM, with the proportion that reached the four-cell stage falling to approximately 50% at 350 mOsM and showing complete arrest at 370 mOsM (Fig. 4A). In contrast, BDF1-derived two-cell embryos were more resistant to increased osmolarity, developing optimally up to 350 mOsM and still reaching about 30% development at 370 mOsM (Fig. 4A). Development to subsequent stages exhibited a similar pattern, with BDF1-derived embryos developing to morulae and blastocysts at a slightly higher rate than CF1 at increased osmolarity (Fig. 4, B–D). The effect of female genotype was significant for development to the four-cell or greater stage (Fig. 4A; P = 0.02) and to the blastocyst stage on Day 5 (Fig. 4C; P = 0.03). The differences in development between CF1- and BDF1-derived in vivo-produced two-cell embryos were small, however, compared with the large differences seen when culturing fertilized eggs. Thus, in vivo-produced embryos from either CF1 or BDF1 females will develop to the four-cell stage and beyond at much higher osmolarities than permit the development of their fertilized eggs to this point.

Induction of the Two-Cell Block Independent of Osmolarity

The results obtained above showed that embryos from both female genotypes would develop from fertilized eggs to the two-cell stage, or from in vivo-produced two-cell embryos to the four-cell stage, at much higher osmolarities than would permit development from fertilized eggs past the two-cell stage. We next wished to determine whether the apparent two-cell block phenomenon in classically nonblocking embryos, such as those derived from BDF1 females, only arose when development was perturbed by increased osmolarity or if this was a more general phenomenon. Thus, we sought to identify conditions that induced a two-cell block independent of osmolarity.

Above, we confirmed that mMTF medium produced a two-cell block in CF1-derived embryos. We therefore tested a series of media in which components of mMTF were altered stepwise from their concentrations in mMTF to those in KSOM, but with osmolarity held constant (at the higher level of mMTF) with added raffinose. We found that altering KCl and MgSO4 from the concentrations found in mMTF to those in KSOM did not significantly improve development past the two-cell stage, and the further addition of EDTA to this formulation also did not significantly increase development, although there was a clear trend toward improvement, especially with addition of EDTA (Fig. 5). Because glucose and phosphate have been reported to act synergistically to produce the two-cell block, we altered their concentrations simultaneously. We found that lowering the concentrations of glucose and phosphate (KH2PO4) to those found in KSOM (while maintaining constant osmolarity) significantly improved the proportion of CF1-derived embryos developing past the two-cell block to the four-cell or greater stage on Day 3 and to the morula stage on Day 4. Development to the four-cell or greater stage on Day 3 was now significantly better than in mMTF or in medium with lowered KCl and MgSO4 and showed a trend toward higher development (although not significant) over medium with these components lowered and with EDTA also added (Fig. 5, B and C). This improvement occurred with or without the addition of EDTA, as there was no further improvement with EDTA present. A further improvement, to the levels of development seen in KSOM, was then obtained either if glutamine was also added or if raffinose was omitted, and this also fully rescued subsequent development to the blastocyst stage. Because glutamine (like glycine) acts as an organic osmolyte in mouse embryos, both these effects are most likely due to osmotic effects, as shown above. Thus, of the components that were tested other than those directly related to osmolarity, glucose and phosphate were found to most strongly affect the ability of CF1-derived fertilized eggs to develop past the two-cell stage in vitro. This indicated that, under the conditions used here, a simultaneous increase in glucose and phosphate could, by itself, significantly increase the proportion of CF1-derived embryos that arrest at the two-cell stage independent of osmolarity.

Comparison of the Response of CF1- and BDF1-Derived Embryos Cultured from Fertilized Eggs to Increased Glucose and Phosphate

Because higher levels of glucose and phosphate in mMTF significantly increased the proportion of CF1-derived embryos blocking at the two-cell stage, we next tested whether further increasing glucose and phosphate could also induce a two-cell block in BDF1-derived embryos (which are not blocked at the level of glucose and phosphate in mMTF; Fig. 1C). As the base medium, we used modified mMTF in which the KCl, MgSO4, glucose, and phosphate concentrations had been altered to those of KSOM, so that development of CF1-derived fertilized eggs past the two-cell stage was supported, while retaining the osmolarity of mMTF with added raffinose (Fig. 5). To determine the effect of increased glucose and phosphate on embryos from both female genotypes (CF1 or BDF1), glucose and phosphate were increased from the levels in KSOM (0.2 mM glucose, 0.35 mM KH2PO4) to 1x, 2x, and 4x those of mMTF (3.4 mM glucose, 1.2 mM KH2PO4 = 1x).

Development from fertilized eggs to the two-cell stage was unaffected for BDF1-derived embryos at any glucose and phosphate level tested, but decreased somewhat for CF1-derived embryos at the highest level (4x; Fig. 6A). The main effect of glucose and phosphate just reached significance (P = 0.047), but there was not a significant effect of female genotype (CF1 or BDF1; P = 0.07) for development to the two-cell stage. Development to the four-cell stage was much more sensitive, however, with an increasing proportion of CF1-derived embryos blocking at the two-cell stage as glucose and phosphate levels were increased over the entire range tested, and BDF1-derived embryos completely blocking at the two-cell stage with 4x glucose and phosphate (Fig. 6B). Subsequent development to morulae and blastocysts also showed a similar pattern, with BDF1-derived embryos being more resistant than CF1-derived embryos, but nonetheless exhibiting decreased development with increased glucose and phosphate (Fig. 6, C and D). For development to each stage past the two-cell stage (Fig. 6, B–E), the main effect of glucose and phosphate was highly significant (P < 0.0001), as was the effect of female genotype (CF1 or BDF1; P < 0.001).

Comparison of the Response of CF1 and BDF1 In Vivo-Produced Two-Cell Embryos to Increased Glucose and Phosphate

We then cultured in vivo-produced two-cell embryos at 2x and 4x the glucose and phosphate levels in mMTF because these had the most substantial effects on development of fertilized eggs to the four-cell stage (above). At both 2x and 4x glucose and phosphate, BDF1-derived two-cell embryos reached the four-cell stage or greater at over 90% (Fig. 7A), and subsequent development was similarly high except for a trend toward a decrease in blastocyst formation at 4x (Fig. 7, B–D). A relatively high proportion of CF1-derived two-cell embryos (~60–70%) also developed to the four-cell stage at both glucose and phosphate levels (Fig. 7A), although subsequent development to morulae showed a trend toward decreasing at 4x, and blastocyst development was low at both glucose and phosphate levels (Fig. 7, B–D). The difference in development between 2x and 4x glucose and phosphate (main effect of glucose and phosphate) was insignificant at all stages except for development to the blastocyst stage by Day 5 (P = 0.03). The main effect of female genotype (CF1 or BDF1) was significant at all stages (P < 0.01).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A Two-Cell Block Occurs in Both CF1- and BDF1-Derived Embryos

The data presented here indicate that a similar two-cell block occurs in embryos derived from both CF1 and BDF1 females. For embryos from both female genotypes, there exists a range of osmolarities in which the fertilized egg will arrest at the two-cell stage but in vivo-produced two-cell embryos will develop to the four-cell stage and beyond. Some media among those we tested of various osmolarities, therefore, resulted in a pattern of development that fit the definition of a two-cell block in both CF1- and BDF1-derived embryos. Examples are shown in Figure 8A, where it is evident that similar patterns of development, indicative of a two-cell block, occurred with CF1 embryos in 310 mOsM medium and in BDF1 embryos in 330 mOsM medium.

The susceptibility of these mouse embryos to arresting at the two-cell stage in vitro likely reflects the same phenomenon in embryos derived from both types of females. In each case, the two-cell block could be rescued by the presence of glycine, which extended the range of osmolarities at which development to the four-cell stage will occur by about the same amount (60–70 mOsM) in each female genotype (CF1 or BDF1). We have previously shown that this phenomenon reflects the ability of CF1-derived embryos to use glycine as an organic osmolyte [12, 14, 15], and thus a similar osmoprotective effect in BDF1-derived embryos indicates a common mechanism.

This apparent two-cell block occurring in embryos from putatively nonblocking female mice was not unique to osmotic perturbations. We also found that fertilized eggs of both female genotypes became blocked at the two-cell stage in media with increased amounts of glucose and phosphate, while, in contrast, in vivo-produced two-cells would develop in the same media (Fig. 8B). Because we increased glucose and phosphate without changing osmolarity of the media, the phenomenon of a two-cell block in both BDF1- and CF1-derived embryos appears to be general and not simply a peculiar pattern due to a single type of perturbation such as osmotic stress.

Greater Perturbations Are Required to Produce the Two-Cell Block in Nonblocking Embryos

While a phenomenon resembling a two-cell block was evident in both genotypes of embryos tested here, the level of stress required to induce the block is apparently different. CF1-derived fertilized eggs ceased to develop past the two-cell stage at lower osmolarities than those of BDF1. As can be seen in Figure 3B, the proportion that developed to the four-cell or greater stage dropped to less than 10%—an essentially complete two-cell block—between 310 and 330 mOsM for CF1-derived embryos, while the corresponding point was at about 350 mOsM for BDF1-derived embryos. Similarly, CF1-derived embryos failed to develop in media with 2x the glucose and phosphate levels of mMTF, while a similar block to development only occurred in BDF1-derived embryos in media with 4x glucose and phosphate (Fig. 6B). Thus, while a similar two-cell block phenomenon apparently occurs in embryos from both female genotypes, lower levels of stress are needed to induce it in CF1- than in BDF1-derived embryos.

In general, all stages of embryos from CF1 females were more susceptible to perturbations than were those from BDF1, even when they were past the two-cell block. Thus, development of in vivo-produced two-cell embryos from BDF1 females were somewhat more resistant to increased osmolarity than those derived from CF1 females (Fig. 4), and a similar phenomenon occurred with respect to increased glucose and phosphate (Fig. 7). Susceptibility at later stages (e.g., the morula to blastocyst transition) cannot be inferred from the data presented here, as any decrease in development may be due to damage sustained during earlier stages that is not evident until later. However, it is likely that even later stages are sensitive, as we found that four-cell embryos produced in media of any osmolarity would develop to blastocysts at a high rate if they were transferred to optimal media (KSOM supplemented with amino acids; data not shown). Thus, the appearance of a two-cell block at lower thresholds of stress in CF1- versus BDF1-derived embryos is apparently a manifestation of a greater general sensitivity of early embryos of the former to stress.

Blocking and Nonblocking Embryos

Mouse embryos have long been divided into blocking and nonblocking, based upon the genotype of the female from which they were derived. Here, however, we showed that at least one female genotype considered to yield nonblocking embryos (BDF1) exhibits a two-cell block that is indistinguishable from that of a female genotype considered strongly blocking (CF1), except that moderately higher levels of stress are required for it to appear. We therefore propose that this division of female mice was an artifact of the classic culture media that were used when these assignments were being made. Culture media such as M16 and Whitten, among others, had higher osmolarity, lacked organic osmolytes and EDTA, and had greater levels of glucose and phosphate than the current generation of culture media that support development of putatively blocking embryos, such as KSOM, CZB, and those used clinically with human embryos [2, 8, 17]. The older media also probably caused higher levels of other stresses, such as oxidative stress, which is relieved by some antioxidants (e.g., taurine) in these newer media [2]. As discussed in detail by Biggers [2], these stresses clearly interact, so that the amount of stress caused by imbalance of a given component depends strongly on the other components and physical parameters of the medium. For example, levels of glucose and phosphate, which contribute strongly to the two-cell block in CF1-derived embryos in mMTF and other media, are, in contrast, completely benign in a medium based on KSOM [18, 19]. For this reason, simultaneous optimization of all components of the medium was required to develop successful culture media for all genotypes of mouse embryos and for embryos of other mammals and humans.

This work establishes that mouse embryos that are traditionally considered blocking and those considered nonblocking are both actually susceptible to a two-cell block. While it does not answer the question of why embryos from some female genotypes, particularly hybrids between inbred strains, have a higher threshold of tolerance before their embryos become blocked, it does provide evidence that the determinants of susceptibility to the two-cell block may not be discrete differences between genotypes but rather arise from a continuum of traits that differ by degree. This should provide a basis for further investigations into the molecular and genetic basis for the two-cell block phenomenon. These observations may be important clinically as well, as the different susceptibility of embryos to stress in animals of the same species but different genotypes may extend to humans, and at least partly explain the varying success rates between patients treated for infertility using in vitro fertilization and embryo culture.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant MOP12040 T.H. and M-A.H. contributed equally to this work. Back

2 Correspondence: Jay M. Baltz, Moses and Rose Loeb Research Centre, Ottawa Health Research Institute, 725 Parkdale Ave., Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada. FAX: 613 761 5327; jbaltz{at}ohri.ca Back

Received: 21 June 2004.

First decision: 12 July 2004.

Accepted: 30 August 2004.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Whitten WK. Culture of tubal mouse ova. Nature 1956 177:96[Medline]
  2. Biggers JD. Reflections on the culture of the preimplantation embryo. Int J Dev Biol 1998 42:879-884[Medline]
  3. Whitten WK, Biggers JD. Complete development in vitro of the pre-implantation stages of the mouse in a simple chemically defined medium. J Reprod Fertil 1968 17:399-401
  4. Scott L, Whittingham DG. Influence of genetic background and media components on the development of mouse embryos in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1996 43:336-346[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Muggleton-Harris A, Whittingham DG, Wilson L. Cytoplasmic control of preimplantation development in vitro in the mouse. Nature 1982 299:460-462[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Chatot CL, Ziomek CA, Bavister BD, Lewis JL, Torres I. An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1989 86:679-688
  7. Lawitts JA, Biggers JD. Optimization of mouse embryo culture media using simplex methods. J Reprod Fertil 1991 91:543-556
  8. Lawitts JA, Biggers JD. Culture of preimplantation embryos. Methods Enzymol 1993 225:153-164[Medline]
  9. Baltz JM. Osmoregulation and cell volume regulation in the preimplantation embryo. In: Schatten GP (ed.), Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 52. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001:55–106
  10. Biggers JD, Lawitts JA, Lechene CP. The protective action of betaine on the deleterious effects of NaCl on preimplantation mouse embryos in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1993 34:380-390[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Lawitts JA, Biggers JD. Joint effects of sodium chloride, glutamine, and glucose in mouse preimplantation embryo culture media. Mol Reprod Dev 1992 31:189-194[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Dawson KM, Baltz JM. Organic osmolytes and embryos: substrates of the Gly and beta transport systems protect mouse zygotes against the effects of raised osmolarity. Biol Reprod 1997 56:1550-1558[Abstract]
  13. Van Winkle LJ, Haghighat N, Campione AL. Glycine protects preimplantation mouse conceptuses from a detrimental effect on development of the inorganic ions in oviductal fluid. J Exp Zool 1990 253:215-219[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Dawson KM, Collins JL, Baltz JM. Osmolarity-dependent glycine accumulation indicates a role for glycine as an organic osmolyte in early preimplantation mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 1998 59:225-232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Steeves CL, Hammer MA, Walker GB, Rae D, Stewart NA, Baltz JM. The glycine neurotransmitter transporter GLYT1 is an organic osmolyte transporter regulating cell volume in cleavage-stage embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003 100:13982-13987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Gardner DK, Lane M. Alleviation of the ‘2-cell block’ and development to the blastocyst of CF1 mouse embryos: role of amino acids, EDTA and physical parameters. Hum Reprod 1996 11:2703-2712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lawitts JA, Biggers JD. Overcoming the 2-cell block by modifying standard components in a mouse embryo culture medium. Biol Reprod 1991 45:245-251[Abstract]
  18. Summers MC, Bhatnagar PR, Lawitts JA, Biggers JD. Fertilization in vitro of mouse ova from inbred and outbred strains: complete preimplantation embryo development in glucose-supplemented KSOM. Biol Reprod 1995 53:431-437[Abstract]
  19. Biggers JD, McGinnis LK. Evidence that glucose is not always an inhibitor of mouse preimplantation development in vitro. Hum Reprod 2001 16:153-163[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. R Mtango and K. E Latham
Differential Expression of Cell Cycle Genes in Rhesus Monkey Oocytes and Embryos of Different Developmental Potentials
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2008; 78(2): 254 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
M. Boiani, L. Gentile, V. V. Gambles, F. Cavaleri, C. A. Redi, and H. R. Scholer
Variable Reprogramming of the Pluripotent Stem Cell Marker Oct4 in Mouse Clones: Distinct Developmental Potentials in Different Culture Environments
Stem Cells, September 1, 2005; 23(8): 1089 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
72/1/179    most recent
biolreprod.104.033324v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Baltz, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Baltz, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hadi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Baltz, J. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS