Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print April 6, 2005.
Biol Reprod 2005, 10.1095/biolreprod.105.040667
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
73/2/256    most recent
biolreprod.105.040667v2
biolreprod.105.040667v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, D.X.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch.V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, D.X.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch.V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lin, D.X.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch.V.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 73, 256–260 (2005)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.040667
© 2005 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Dependence of Uterine Cyclooxygenase2 Expression on Luteinizing Hormone Signaling

D.X. Lin 2 , Z.M. Lei , and Ch.V. Rao 1 

Division of Research, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Louisville Health Sciences Center, Louisville, Kentucky 40292


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Several previous studies have demonstrated that uterine Cox2 (also known as Ptgs2) is required for implantation. Luteinizing hormone (LH) released from anterior pituitary gland and human chorionic gonadotropin released from placenta (hCG) can upregulate the uterine Cox2 gene expression. The Lhcgr knockout (herein designated LHRKO) animals have implantation failure even after estradiol and progesterone therapy. These findings led us to investigate the dependence of uterine Cox2 gene expression on LH signaling in LHRKO animals. The results revealed that, while Cox1 (also known as Ptgs1) mRNA levels were similar, Cox2 mRNA levels were lower in uterus of null animals than in wild-type siblings. Treatment with hCG did not increase Cox2 mRNA levels in null endometrial stromal or myometrial smooth-muscle cells unless gene therapy was performed to introduce native LHCGR. The Cox1 mRNA levels, on the other hand, did not change regardless of the introduction of native or activated Lhcgr or hCG treatment. The Cox2 mRNA increase paralleled the cAMP raise, suggesting that LH uses the cAMP second messenger system. Treating the wild-type uterine cells with hCG resulted in a Cox2 but not Cox1 mRNA increase. This increase became exaggerated when additional native LHCGR were introduced by gene therapy. In conclusion, deletion and reinsertion of Lhcgr further support that uterine Cox2 gene expression is dependent on LH signaling.

adenoviral vectors, cAMP signaling, Cox1 and Cox2 mRNA, cyclic adenosine monophosphate, female reproductive tract, gene regulation, LHCGR, Lhcgr gene therapy, LHRKO, luteinizing hormone, uterus


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Two separate genes encode Cox (also known as Ptgs) isoforms, 1 and 2 [1, 2]. They share 60% sequence homology and have superimposable three-dimensional structures and similar active sites [1, 3]. Although they catalyze the formation of endoperoxides from arachidonic acid with similar kinetics, they differ in their putative roles and responses to a variety of stimulatory agents. For example, COX1 is considered a constitutive enzyme, responsible for making eicosanoids for housekeeping functions. The COX2, on the other hand, is considered an inducible enzyme, responsible for eicosanoids formation needed for inflammation, pyresis, and carcinogensis [4, 5]. The differences between the two enzymes, however, does not seem to be as distinct as once believed [3]. Thus, the same stimulus that can activate COX1 enzyme for immediate eicosanoid production can also activate COX2 for delayed production [3]. Moreover, the ultimate production of different eicosanoids is also dictated by the relative abundance and activation of specific isomerases [3].

LH released from anterior pituitary gland and hCG released from human placenta are structural and functional homologs that bind to the same G-protein-coupled receptors, which are also present in uterus of a large number of species [6, 7]. The uterine receptor activation results in numerous changes that are considered essential for pregnancy initiation [6, 8]. One of the changes is the upregulation of Cox2 gene expression in endometrial epithelial and stromal cells [8]. This upregulation occurs via an increase in stability of the transcripts rather than an increase in the transcription of the gene [8]. The hCG/LH actions require their receptors, as inhibition of their synthesis by treatment with phosphorothioate antisense receptor oligodeoxynucleotide resulted in a loss of Cox2 response [9]. Cyclic AMP/protein kinase A signaling is required for the hCG/LH actions, as inhibitors of PKA activation could block Cox2 response to hCG [9].

We recently knocked out Lhcgr by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells [10]. The null animals (herein designated LHRKO) have a morphological uterine phenotype, which includes a dramatic decrease in uterine weight, thickness of uterine layers, the number of endometrial glands, luminal epithelial cell height, and vascular space [11]. The molecular phenotype includes decreased expression of 89 genes and increased expression of 66 by 3- to 54-fold as determined by mouse genome U74Av2 Affymetrix genechips [12]. The null uterine phenotype was not entirely due to a decrease in serum estradiol and progesterone levels [12]. In fact, null animals could not implant wild-type donor blastocysts even after estradiol and progesterone therapy [11].

Uterus also contains COX1 and its distinct role from COX2 was revealed by gene-knockout studies. For example, while Cox1 gene inactivation resulted in limited parturitional defects, the Cox2 gene inactivation resulted in an infertility phenotype, which included decidualization failure [5]. Because of the potential importance of uterine LHCGR in implantation through increasing Cox2 gene expression, we used LHRKO animals and adenoviral-directed gene therapy to further investigate the dependence of uterine Cox2 gene expression on LH signaling.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
LHRKO Mice

LHRKO mice, generated by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells, were maintained according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All studies have been approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at our institution. The animals were maintained on 12L:12D with food and water provided ad libitum. Adult male and female heterozygous mice were mated to obtain wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (±) and homozygous (–/–) animals. The zygosity was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of tail genomic DNA. The uteri from 60-day old animals were removed and processed immediately for further experiments. The wild-type animals were sacrificed at random during the cycle. The null animals were placed on 21-day estradiol/progesterone replacement therapy to stimulate uterine growth before sacrifice. Three to six mice were used for each experiment.

Semiquantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR

Total RNA was extracted by using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Twenty-five microliters total reaction mixture containing 3 µg of total RNA, 1.5 µg of random hexamers, 40 U of RNasin Plus RNase Inhibitor, and 30 U of avian myelablastosis virus reverse transcriptase was incubated for 60 min at 37°C followed by another 5-min incubation at 95°C. Then 32 cycles of PCRs were performed using primer sets for either Cox1 or Cox2 and Rpl19 (also known as ribosomal protein large subunit19) as an internal standard. The reaction mixture contained 1.0 µM of forward and reverse primers, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 µl cDNA, 200 µM dNTP, and 1.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI). Each cycle consisted of denaturation for 45 sec at 94°C, annealing for 45 sec at 57°C, extension for 75 sec at 72°C, and the last extension for 5 min at 72°C. The amplified PCR products were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and analyzed using TotalLab V 2.01 (Nonlinear USA Inc., Durham, NC) image analysis software. Then the ratio of Cox1 or Cox2 to Rpl19 mRNA was calculated and set at 1.0 for wild-type animals or noninfected cells. Procedural controls included omissions of RNA or cDNA templates, reverse transcriptase, or random primers. PCR primers were designed according to the sequences obtained from GenBank using the Vector NTI computer program and synthesized by Qiagen (Valencia, CA). The primer sequences were Cox1: forward, 5'-TGCCCTCACCAGTCAATCCCTG-3', and reverse, 5'-TGGGGATAAGGTTGGACCGCAC-3'; Cox2: forward, 5'-TTTGCCCAGCACTTCACCCATC-3', and reverse, 5'-CTTCCTGCCCCACAGCAAACTG-3'; Rpl19: forward, 5'-CTCAGGCTACAGAAGAGGCTT-3', and reverse, 5'-GGACAGAGTCTTGATGATCTC-3'.

Preparation and Culture of Endometrial Stromal and Myometrial Smooth-Muscle Cells

Dissected fat-free uteri were placed in ice-cold Hanks HEPES solution, slit longitudinally and cut into small pieces. The pieces were immersed in Hanks solution containing 3.7 mg/ml of trypsin type I (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and incubated for 60 min at 4°C followed by another 60-min incubation at 22°C. Then the tissue pieces were washed and digested for 30 min at 37°C in Hanks solution containing 0.3 mg/ml of trypsin type 1, 0.3 mg/ml of collagenase type I A, and 0.15 mg/ml of DNase I (Sigma) to release endometrial cells. Then the tissue pieces were washed and digested again for 1 h at 37°C with a Hanks solution containing 0.2 mg/ml of trypsin type I, 0.5 mg/ml collagenase type I A, 0.1 mg/ml DNase I, and 0.2 mg/ml of EDTA to release myometrial smooth-muscle cells, which were recovered after passing the digest through 50 mesh filters.

The endometrial stromal and myometrial smooth-muscle cell suspensions were centrifuged for 10 min at 300 x g and washed three times with Hanks solution. The cells were counted in a hemocytometer and the viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion that was greater than 85%. The cell suspensions were seeded into 25-cm2 flasks at a final density of 2–3 x 106 cells in 5 ml of Dulbecco modified Eagle medium/F12 containing fetal bovine serum (10% v/v), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and Fungizone (10 µg/ml).

Endometrial stromal cells were maintained for 1 h at 37°C in a humidified air atmosphere containing 5% CO2. During this period, most of the cells begin to attach. The attached cells were washed several times to remove the luminal and glandular epithelial cells. The purity of stromal cells was determined by immunostaining with anti-vimentin antibody (Sigma), which was estimated to be greater than 95%. The washed endometrial stromal cells were cultured at 37°C in humidified air containing 5% CO2 to grow until adequate cell numbers were obtained for adenoviral infection.

Myometrial cells were maintained for 16 h at 37°C in humidified air containing 5% CO2, which allowed fibroblasts to adhere to the culture flasks. Unattached smooth-muscle cells were transferred to new flasks and cultured at 37°C in humidified air containing 5% CO2. The purity of smooth-muscle cells was determined by immunostaining with anti-smooth-muscle actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma), which was estimated to be greater than 95%. To obtain adequate cell numbers from null uteri for adenoviral infection, pooled uterine tissue was used for cell dispersion. The dispersed null endometrial stromal and myometrial smooth-muscle cells failed to grow during culture. Therefore, we had to seed them at high density for primary cultures and avoid the multiple washing steps to use cells from primary culture for viral infection.

Preparation of Adeno Viral Particles Containing Lhcgr Gene, Infection, and Treatment of Uterine Cells

Adenoviral stocks containing native or constitutively activated mutant (LhcgrD578H) human Lhcgr were gifts from Dr. Anthony J. Zeleznik (University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA) [13]. They were propagated by infecting the HEK293 cells. Monolayers of stromal and smooth-muscle cells in culture were infected either with adeno-native Lhcgr or adeno-LhcgrD578H viruses for 48 h. The infected cells were then incubated for 24 h with either no hCG or with 100 ng/ml of highly purified hCG (CR127; 14 900 IU/mg, National Hormone and Pituitary Program, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH).

Cyclic AMP Assay Measurement

Media cyclic AMP levels were quantified using an enzyme immunoassay. Samples were assayed according to the manufacturer instructions (Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI). The results were calculated by enzyme immunoassay analysis tools available on the Cayman Chemical web site.

Statistical Analysis

The data were presented as means ± SEM. Significant differences were obtained by the data analysis by ANOVA and Duncan multiple range test [14].


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We first examined the uterine Cox1 and Cox2 mRNA levels by semiquantitative RT-PCR, which revealed that Cox1 mRNA levels were similar (Fig. 1A), whereas Cox2 mRNA levels were significantly lower in null animals than in wild-type siblings (Fig. 1B). The levels in heterozygous animals were indistinguishable from wild-type littermates (Fig. 1B).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. The uterine Cox1 (A) and Cox2 (B) mRNA levels in 60-day-old wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous LH receptor knockout animals. Insets show the representative reverse transcription-PCR data and the lane sequence corresponds to the bars. Bars in this and in the other figures represent the means ± SEM. *P < 0.05 compared with +/+ siblings

If the decrease in Cox2 mRNA levels was due to a loss of uterine LH receptors, then gene therapy to restore receptors should bring back to wild-type Cox2 mRNA levels. Lhcgr gene therapy was used to test this possibility. Figure 2 shows that the hCG treatment or the transfer of native or activated Lhcgr genes had no effect on Cox1 mRNA levels in null (Fig. 2A) and wild-type (Fig. 2B) endometrial stromal cells. While hCG treatment resulted in a small but significant increase in Cox2 mRNA levels in wild-type stromal cells (Fig. 2B), the treatment failed in null cells (Fig. 2A) unless native Lhcgr was first introduced by adenoviral-directed gene therapy. While the transfer of native Lhcgr alone had no effect, the transfer of activated Lhcgr resulted in a Cox2 mRNA increase to the levels seen in hCG-treated null stromal cells containing transferred native Lhcgr (Fig. 2A).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Effects of treatment of endometrial stromal cells from null (A) and wild-type (B) animals with hCG and adenoviral vectors containing wild-type or constitutively activated mutant Lhcgr on Cox1 and Cox2 mRNA levels. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with noninfected cells

The Cox2 mRNA increase was exaggerated in hCG-treated wild-type stromal cells that contained transferred native Lhcgr (Fig. 2B). The hCG treatment was not needed for wild-type stromal cells that contained activated Lhcgr. In fact, the increase of Cox2 mRNA was the same as in hCG-treated wild-type stromal cells containing transferred native Lhcgr (Fig. 2B).

The results obtained on null and wild-type myometrial smooth-muscle cells paralleled those obtained on stromal cells. Thus, hCG treatment or the transfer of native or activated Lhcgr had no effect on Cox1 mRNA levels (Figs. 3A and 4B). Null cells' Cox2 mRNA levels were not responsive to hCG treatment unless native Lhcgr were first introduced by gene therapy (Fig. 3A). As expected, wild-type cells could modestly respond to hCG treatment, which became exaggerated following gene therapy (Fig. 3B). While transfer of native Lhcgr alone had no effect, the transfer of activated Lhcgr resulted in a significant Cox2 mRNA increase to the same degree as in hCG-treated cells containing introduced native Lhcgr (Fig. 3B).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Effects of treatment of myometrial smooth-muscle cells from null (A) and wild-type (B) animals with hCG and adenoviral vectors containing wild-type and constitutively activated mutant Lhcgr on Cox1 and Cox2 mRNA levels. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with noninfected cells



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Effect of treatment of endometrial stromal and myometrial smooth-muscle cells from null (A) and wild-type (B) animals with hCG and adenoviral vectors containing wild-type or constitutively activated mutant Lhcgr on media cAMP levels. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with noninfected cells

The hCG and LH use multiple signaling pathways, with cyclic AMP being the most common among them in nongonadal cells, just as in gonadal cells [9, 15]. We used cAMP measurement in the present study to determine the hCG response in the absence or presence of transferred native or activated Lhcgr in null and wild-type endometrial stromal and myometrial smooth-muscle cells. As shown in Figure 4A, null endometrial stromal and myometrial smooth-muscle cells did not respond to hCG unless gene therapy was used. While the transfer of native Lhcgr alone had no effect, the transfer of activated Lhcgr resulted in an equivalent response to hCG-treated cells containing introduced native Lhcgr.

As expected, the wild-type endometrial stromal cells and myometrial smooth-muscle cells showed a small but significant cAMP increase in response of hCG treatment (Fig. 4B). This increase was several fold higher in hCG-treated cells containing transferred native Lhcgr. While the transfer of native Lhcgr alone did not increase cAMP production, the transfer of activated Lhcgr resulted in a cAMP increase to the levels seen with hCG-treated cells containing introduced native Lhcgr.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mammalian uterus expresses both Cox1 and Cox2 genes [5, 8, 16, 17]. The activities of COXs coupled with specific isomerases results in the formation of several eicosanoids. The type and amount of eicosanoids formed depends on the cell type and physiological or pathological state of the uterus. Gene knockout studies have revealed that, while COX2 activity was required for early pregnancy, COX1 activity was required for late pregnancy [17]. Thus, Cox2 gene knockout animals have an infertility phenotype, whereas Cox1 gene knockout animals have limited parturitional defects [5]. These studies have also revealed that, while COX1 does not compensate for COX2 loss, COX2 can compensate for COX1 loss during early pregnancy [17]. Because the double Cox1 and Cox2 gene knockout animals do not survive beyond the neonatal period, pharmacological studies revealed that inhibition of both COX1 and COX2 activities resulted in more severe effects than inhibition of COX2 alone during early pregnancy [17].

Until recently, LH and hCG were not considered among the hormones that regulate uterine Cox2 gene expression. However, the studies from around the world have now demonstrated that uteri of a number of species contains LHCGR and their activation results in numerous changes, one of which is the upregulation of Cox2 gene expression [8, 9, 1820]. This increase was seen at the mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity levels, and the increases were time and dose dependent and hormone specific [8, 9]. Blocking the cyclic AMP/protein kinase A second messenger pathway resulted in the loss of the LH and hCG's ability to increase Cox2 gene expression, suggesting that cAMP/PKA mediates their action [9]. These findings clearly establish that LH and hCG can activate Cox2 gene expression, which plays an essential role in implantation, which is defective in LHRKO animals even after estradiol and progesterone therapy [11]. The implantation failure in LHRKO animals suggested the possibility of selective Cox2 gene expression impairment in the uterus. Consistent with this possibility, uterine Cox2 mRNA levels were lower in null animals than in wild-type siblings. If these lower levels were due to a loss of uterine LHCGR, then gene therapy to introduce them should restore the hCG's ability to upregulate Cox2 gene expression. Consistent with this expectation, hCG treatment indeed increased Cox2 mRNA levels after the native Lhcgr was introduced into the null uterine cells by gene therapy.

The LHCGR activation is required for the increase of Cox2 mRNA levels. Constitutively activated receptors due to a mutation do not require activation. The concept of receptor activation is also supported by the previous findings, which demonstrated the loss of hCG response following the inhibition of LHCGR synthesis by treatment with antisense phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotide [9].

The wild-type uterine cells containing LHCGR served as valuable controls in further ascertaining the necessity of receptors in the LH and hCG upregulation of uterine Cox2 gene expression. Thus, wild-type uterine cells responded to hCG treatment without gene therapy. The gene therapy, however, made the hCG response exaggerated, which was probably due to elevation of cellular receptor levels.

The cAMP increase in uterine cells bearing native or activated LHCGR and after hCG treatment paralleled Cox2 mRNA responses. This finding, along with the previous ones, are consistent with the premise that cAMP is a second messenger in the LH and hCG actions to upregulate uterine Cox2 gene expression [8, 9].

The present results do not eliminate the possible involvement of other hormones, growth factors, and cytokines in the upregulation of uterine Cox2 gene expression. This is supported by the finding that null uterus does express Cox2 mRNA, even though its ability to respond to hCG stimulation was lost. This non-hCG-responsive Cox-2 mRNA could be maintained by other signals that are intact in the LHRKO animals. The continued implantation failure in estradiol/progesterone-replaced null animals could be due not only to the absence of LH responsive expression of Cox2, but also of other genes.

In conclusion, the present results with the inactivation of the Lhcgr gene and adenoviral-directed gene therapy to introduce native or activated Lhcgr add further support to the idea that LH signaling upregulates uterine Cox2 gene expression and the implantation defect in LHRKO animals could at least partly be due to the defective Cox2 gene regulation.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Correspondence: Ch.V. Rao, Division of Research, Department of Ob, Gyn, and Women's Health, 438 MDR Building, 511 South Floyd St., University of Louisville Health Sciences Center, Louisville, KY 40292. FAX: 502 8520881; cvrao001{at}louisville.edu Back

2 Current address: Department of Biochemistry, Fujian Medical University, 88 Jiao Tong Road, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350004, The People's Republic of China Back

Received: 3 February 2005.

First decision: 28 February 2005.

Accepted: 5 April 2005.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Morita I, Schindler M, Regier MK, Otto JC, Hori T, DeWitt DL, Smith WL. Different intracellular locations for prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase-1 and -2. J Biol Chem 1995 270:10902-10908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Matsumoto H, Ma W, Smalley W, Trzaskos J, Breyer RM, Dey SK. Diversification of cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostaglandins in ovulation and implantation. Biol Reprod 2001 64:1557-1565[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Rouzer CA, Kingsley PJ, Wang H, Zhang H, Morrow JD, Dey SK, Marnett LJ. Cyclooxygenase-1-dependent prostaglandin synthesis modulates tumor necrosis factor-alpha secretion in lipopolysaccharide-challenged murine resident peritoneal macrophages. J Biol Chem 2004 279:34256-34268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Smith WL, Dewitt DL. Prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthases-1 and -2. Adv Immunol 1996 62:167-215[Medline]
  5. Lim H, Paria BC, Das SK, Dinchuk JE, Langenbach R, Trzaskos JM, Dey SK. Multiple female reproductive failures in cyclooxygenase 2-deficient mice. Cell 1997 91:197-208[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Han SW, Lei ZM, Rao CV. Treatment of human endometrial stromal cells with chorionic gonadotropin promotes their morphological and functional differentiation into decidua. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1999 147:7-16[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Toth P, Li X, Rao CV, Lincoln SR, Sanfilippo JS, Spinnato JA 2nd, Yussman MA. Expression of functional human chorionic gonadotropin/human luteinizing hormone receptor gene in human uterine arteries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994 79:307-315[Abstract]
  8. Han SW, Lei ZM, Rao CV. Upregulation of cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression by chorionic gonadotropin during the differentiation of human endometrial stromal cells into decidua. Endocrinology 1996 137:1791-1797[Abstract]
  9. Zhou XL, Lei ZM, Rao CV. Treatment of human endometrial gland epithelial cells with chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone increases the expression of the cyclooxygenase-2 gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999 84:3364-3377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lei ZM, Mishra S, Zou W, Xu B, Foltz M, Li X, Rao CV. Targeted disruption of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptor gene. Mol Endocrinol 2001 15:184-200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rao CV, Lei ZM. Consequences of targeted inactivation of LH receptors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2002 187:57-67[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Lin DX, Lei ZM, Li X, Rao CV. Targeted disruption of LH receptor gene revealed the importance of uterine LH signaling. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2005: 234:105–116
  13. Bebia Z, Somers JP, Liu G, Ihrig L, Shenker A, Zeleznik AJ. Adenovirus-directed expression of functional luteinizing hormone (LH) receptors in undifferentiated rat granulosa cells: evidence for differential signaling through follicle-stimulating hormone and LH receptors. Endocrinology 2001 142:2252-2259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, with Special Reference to the Biological Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1960
  15. Rao CV. An overview of the past, present, and future of nongonadal LH/hCG actions in reproductive biology and medicine. Semin Reprod Med 2001 19:7-17[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Korita D, Itoh H, Sagawa N, Yura S, Yoshida M, Kakui K, Takemura M, Fujii S. 17beta-estradiol up-regulates prostacyclin production in cultured human uterine myometrial cells via augmentation of both cyclooxygenase-1 and prostacyclin synthase expression. J Soc Gynecol Invest 2004 11:457-464[Medline]
  17. Reese J, Zhao X, Ma WG, Brown N, Maziasz TJ, Dey SK. Comparative analysis of pharmacologic and/or genetic disruption of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 function in female reproduction in mice. Endocrinology 2001 142:3198-3206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Freidman S, Gurevich M, Shemesh M. Bovine cyclic endometrium contains high-affinity luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin binding sites. Biol Reprod 1995 52:1020-1026[Abstract]
  19. Kim JJ, Wang J, Bambra C, Das SK, Dey SK, Fazleabas AT. Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in the baboon endometrium during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. Endocrinology 1999 140:2672-2678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Munir I, Fukunaga K, Miyazaki K, Okamura H, Miyamoto E. Mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 expression by platelet-activating factor and hCG in human endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line HEC-1B. J Reprod Fertil 1999 117:49-59



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.A. Campbell, L. O'Hara, R.D. Catalano, A.M. Sharkey, T.C. Freeman, and M. H. Johnson
Temporal expression profiling of the uterine luminal epithelium of the pseudo-pregnant mouse suggests receptivity to the fertilized egg is associated with complex transcriptional changes
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2495 - 2513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
73/2/256    most recent
biolreprod.105.040667v2
biolreprod.105.040667v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, D.X.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch.V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, D.X.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch.V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lin, D.X.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, Ch.V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS