Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print April 20, 2005.
Biol Reprod 2005, 10.1095/biolreprod.105.041798
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
73/2/351    most recent
biolreprod.105.041798v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eppig, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pendola, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eppig, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pendola, J. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eppig, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pendola, J. K.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 73, 351–357 (2005)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.041798
© 2005 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Mouse Oocytes Regulate Metabolic Cooperativity Between Granulosa Cells and Oocytes: Amino Acid Transport1

John J. Eppig 2 , Frank L. Pendola , Karen Wigglesworth , and Janice K. Pendola 

The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A search for genes expressed more highly in mouse cumulus cells than mural granulosa cells by subtraction hybridization yielded Slc38a3. SLC38A3 is a sodium-coupled neutral amino acid transporter having substrate preference for L-glutamate, L-histidine, and L-alanine. Detectable levels of Slc38a3 mRNA were found by in situ hybridization in granulosa cells of large preantral follicles, but levels were higher in all granulosa cells of small antral follicles; expression became limited to cumulus cells of large antral follicles. Expression of Slc38a3 mRNA in granulosa cells was promoted by fully grown oocytes from antral follicles but not by growing oocytes from preantral follicles. Fully grown oocytes were dependent on cumulus cells for uptake of L-alanine and L-histidine but not L-leucine. Fully grown but not growing oocytes secreted one or more paracrine factors that promoted cumulus cell uptake of all three amino acids but of L-alanine and L-histidine to a much greater extent than L-leucine. Uptake of L-leucine appeared dependent primarily on contact-mediated signals from fully grown oocytes. Fully grown oocytes also promoted elevated levels of Slc38a3 mRNA and L-alanine transport by preantral granulosa cells, but growing oocytes did not. Therefore, fully grown oocytes secrete one or more paracrine factors that promote cumulus cell uptake of amino acids that oocytes themselves transport poorly. These amino acids are likely transferred to oocytes via gap junctions. Thus, oocytes use paracrine signals to promote their own development via metabolic cooperativity with cumulus cells. The ability of oocytes to mediate this cooperativity is developmentally regulated and acquired only in later stages of oocyte development.

developmental biology, follicular development, gamete biology, gametogenesis, oocyte development


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bidirectional communication between oocytes and companion somatic cells is essential for the development and function of both cell types and to coordinate the overall development of the ovarian follicle [1, 2]. That a metabolic cooperativity occurs between the oocyte and granulosa cells has been known since classic experiments conducted in the 1960s [3, 4]. Mouse oocytes only poorly take up and use glucose as an energy source. Although cumulus cell-enclosed oocytes resume meiosis when cultured in medium containing only glucose as an energy source, cumulus cell-denuded oocytes do not. Nevertheless, addition of pyruvate to the oocyte culture medium does provide support for the resumption of meiosis by denuded oocytes [3, 4]. The evidence indicates that cumulus cells take up and metabolize glucose to products that can be used by oocytes for the energy metabolism necessary to support meiotic maturation [5], an example of metabolic cooperativity. Recent studies show that fully grown oocytes promote elevated steady-state levels of transcripts encoding enzymes in the glycolytic pathway in cumulus cells [6]. Thus, oocytes promote a key metabolic function of cumulus cells that is necessary for oocyte meiotic maturation.

Another example of the metabolic support of oocytes by cumulus cells involves the uptake of some amino acids, such as L-alanine, which are poorly transported into mouse oocytes and require uptake first by cumulus cells and then transfer to the oocyte via gap junctions. When oocytes are cultured with radiolabeled L-alanine, the amount of radioactivity detected in the oocytes cultured enclosed by cumulus cells is greater than in oocytes cultured while denuded of cumulus cells [7]. Blocking the function of gap junctions in oocyte-cumulus cell complexes abrogates this difference [8]. We designate this group of amino acids as coupling dependent, coupling referring to gap junctional coupling between the oocyte and companion cumulus cells. Other (coupling independent) amino acids, such as L-leucine, are not differentially incorporated into cumulus cell-enclosed oocytes compared with denuded oocytes [7].

Suppression subtraction hybridization was used to identify transcripts expressed at higher levels in cumulus cells than in mural granulosa cells (MGCs); cumulus cell cDNA was used as the tester and mural granulosa cell cDNAs as the driver. The rationale for this project was that cumulus cell-enriched transcripts may be regulated by the oocyte. The transcript encoded by the solute carrier family 38, member 3 (Slc38a3) gene (MGI:1923507), was identified as enriched in the cumulus cell cDNA library. In the first part of this report, we describe the localization of Slc38a3 mRNA in the mouse ovary, and studies conducted to determine whether the elevated steady-state levels of this transcript in cumulus cells are maintained by oocytes. SLC38A3 is a sodium-coupled neutral amino acid transporter highly expressed in liver. Transporters in this family exhibit a preference for L-glutamate, L-histidine, and L-alanine. When Slc38a3 mRNA was injected into Xenopus oocytes, L-alanine transport into the frog oocytes was increased about 10-fold [9]. In the second part of this report, we determined whether oocytes affect the uptake of both coupling-dependent and independent amino acids by cumulus cells.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

B6SJLF1 mice, bred and raised in the research colony of the investigators, were used for all experiments. Ovaries were obtained from 22-day-old mice either without gonadotropin priming or 44 h after priming by injection of 5 IU eCG to stimulate follicular development. The ovaries from 12-day-old mice were used for some experiments; no prior hormonal priming was used in this case. The mice were maintained according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute for Learning and Animal Research).

In Situ Hybridization

After sequencing, a 332-bp clone from a cDNA library enriched in cumulus cell transcripts was identified as encoding a transcript of Slc38a3 encompassing exons 9 and 10. The clone was linearized with MaeIII (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) to yield a 186-bp antisense RNA labeled with 33P CTP for in situ hybridization, which was carried out as we described previously [10] using ovaries from 12-day-old or 22-day-old mice 44 h after eCG priming.

Culture of Oocytes and Granulosa Cells

Cumulus cells and preantral granulosa cells were collected as previously reported [11]. Briefly, oocytes were surgically removed from granulosa cell-oocyte complexes either from antral follicles of 22-day-old primed mice or from preantral follicles of 12-day-old mice to collect either cumulus cells or preantral granulosa cells, respectively. These granulosa cell complexes are referred as oocytectomized complexes (OOXs) in this study. Fully grown, meiotically competent oocytes were isolated by gentle pipetting of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs). Growing, meiotically incompetent oocytes were collected from the preantral follicles of 12-day-old mice by collagenase digestion as described previously [12, 13].

The culture medium used was bicarbonate-buffered MEM{alpha} (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) with Earles salts, supplemented with 75 mg/L penicillin G, 50 mg/L streptomycin sulfate, 0.23 mM pyruvate, and 3 mg/ml crystallized lyophilized BSA. To maintain oocytes competent to undergo germinal vesicle breakdown (GVB) at the GV stage, the phosphodiesterase inhibitor milrinone (10 µM) was added to all culture medium regardless of whether oocytes were present or whether the oocytes were incompetent to undergo spontaneous maturation. All medium components were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO). In some experiments, granulosa cells were cocultured with fully grown oocytes or growing oocytes at the concentration of either 2 oocytes/µl or 4 oocytes/µl of culture medium, respectively. These relative concentrations were based on comparable oocyte volume [14]. All cultures were performed in 48-well cell culture plates (#3548, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY) in 100–150 µl volume of culture medium for 15 h and were maintained at 37°C in a modular incubation chamber (Billups Rothenberg, Del Mar, CA) infused with 5% O2, 5% CO2, and 90% N2.

RNase Protection Assays

Messenger RNA was isolated as described previously [15] from samples of granulosa cells obtained after the various culture experiments presented here. Protected RNA fragments were analyzed and quantified using a Fuji PhosphorImaging System (Fuji Medical Systems USA, Stamford, CT). Data are expressed as the relative steady-state level of Slc38a3 mRNA normalized with mRNA encoded by the housekeeping gene Rpl19. Results are presented as the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments.

Uptake of Radiolabeled Amino Acids

To assess the uptake of amino acids, either intact oocyte-cumulus cell complexes, OOX cumulus cells, OOX cumulus cells cocultured with oocytes, or cumulus cell-denuded oocytes were collected after 15 h culture as described previously. They were washed through three dishes of Whitten medium containing 3 mg/ml BSA and 10 µM milrinone and transferred to 150 µl of same medium in 48-well tissue culture plates. Importantly, Whitten medium does not contain free amino acids [16]. The cells were incubated for 3 h in 100 µCi/ml medium containing one of three 3H-labeled amino acids, L-alanine (66 Ci/mmol), L-histidine (50 Ci/ mmole), or L-leucine (300 mCi/mmole) purchased from Dupont NEN (Boston, MA). After incubation, the cells were washed again through three changes of Whitten medium with milrinone and BSA but no labeled amino acids. Incorporation of amino acids into half the intact oocyte-cumulus complexes was determined. Uptake of amino acids into all the other groups is expressed as a percentage of the counts per minute relative to the intact oocyte-cumulus cell complex. The cumulus cells were removed from the other half of the oocyte-cumulus cell complexes, and incorporation of the amino acids into either the oocytes or cumulus cells was measured separately. When incorporation of amino acids into the OOX group that was cocultured with oocytes was measured, the oocytes were removed before assessing uptake into the OOX cumulus cells. Ten oocytes, complexes, or the cumulus cells from 10 complexes were assessed for incorporation of radiolabeled amino acids as described previously [17]. Briefly, the washed cells in 5.0 µl of medium from the final wash dish were transferred to scintillation vials. Two samples were assessed for each group in each experiment, and the experiments were conducted three times independently. For each experiment, a duplicate set of medium blanks (5.0 µl of medium only from the final wash dish) was also prepared. One hundred microliters of 0.1 N NaOH were added to each vial, and samples were held at room temperature for 1 h to dissolve the cells. Then, 0.1 N HCl was added to neutralize the NaOH. The radioactivity in each sample was determined by scintillation spectroscopy. The counts per minute of the blank samples were subtracted from experimental samples.

Statistical Analyses

All experiments were performed at least three times. The Student t-test was used for paired comparisons. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ovarian Localization of Slc38a3 mRNA

The site(s) of Slc38a3 mRNA expression in the mouse ovary was assessed using in situ hybridization. No expression was detected in the preantral follicles of 12-day-old mice (not shown). Expression of Slc38a3 mRNA in 22-day-old eCG-primed mice was low or undetectable in primordial, primary, or early secondary follicles or in oocytes at any stage of follicular development. However, expression increased in the later stages of secondary (preantral) follicles and was highest in all the granulosa cells, both cumulus and mural, of early tertiary (antral) follicles (Fig. 1). With the progression of antral follicle development, expression diminished to undetectable levels in MGCs but remained elevated in cumulus cells (Fig. 1). This verified the outcome of subtraction hybridization, indicating that the steady-state levels of Slc38a3 mRNA in cumulus cells were higher than in MGCs.



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Localization of Slc38a3 transcripts. Light field (A) and dark field (B) demonstrating the localization of Slc38a3 transcripts in follicles of the ovaries of 22-day-old mice 44 h after injection of 5 IU eCG. No Slc38a3 mRNA was detected in oocytes. No expression was detected in small preantral follicles (arrow 1, A and B). Low levels of expression were seen in granulosa cells of large preantral follicles (arrow 2, A and B), and this increased dramatically in early antral follicles (arrow 3, A and B), wherein both cumulus and mural granulosa cells showed relatively high levels of expression. However, expression was limited to the cumulus cells of large antral follicles (arrow 4, A and B). C) The interpretation of the localization of the transcripts and their relative levels: white cells = low to undetectable expression, light blue cells = detectable mRNA levels, dark blue cells = maximum level of expression (numbers correspond to numbered arrows in A and B). Bars = 100 µm

Effect of Oocytes on Steady-State Slc38a3 mRNA Levels in Cumulus Cells

To determine whether oocytes of antral follicles affect the steady-state level of Slc38a3 mRNA expressed in cumulus cells, oocytes were microsurgically removed from COCs (OOX), and intact COCs and OOX cumulus cells were cultured for 15 h before assessing relative levels of Slc38a3 transcripts expressed in the cumulus cells using RNase protection assays. In addition, OOX cumulus cells were cocultured with cumulus cell-free FGOs (2 oocytes/ µl) isolated from large antral follicles. OOX resulted in a reduction (P < 0.05) in the steady-state Slc38a3 mRNA to almost undetectable levels in cumulus cells, but coculture of OOX cumulus cells with FGOs restored levels to about the same as seen in the cumulus cells of intact COCs (Fig. 2A). Thus, FGOs promote the expression of Slc38a3 mRNA by cumulus cells.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Effect of oocytes on relative steady-state levels of Slc38a3 mRNA expression. A) Effect of fully grown oocytes (FGO) on relative steady-state levels of Slc38a3 transcripts in cumulus cells. Intact cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC), oocytectomized complex (OOX) cumulus cells, and OOX cumulus cells + FGOs were cultured for 15 h. Cumulus cells were collected and assessed for relative levels of Scl38a3 mRNA levels using RNase protection assays. Data were normalized to the levels of Rpl19 mRNA, the values of the control (cumulus cells from the COCs) sample in each experiment were set at 1, and the values of the two experimental groups are expressed relative to those. The figure shows the mean and SEM of three independent experiments. * indicates significant difference (P < 0.05) from COC control. B) Effect of growing oocytes (GO) on the relative steady-state levels of Slc38a3 mRNA in OOX cumulus cells. OOX cumulus cells (control) were cocultured with either FGOs (2 oocytes/µl) or GOs (4 oocytes/µl) for 15 h and RNase protection data were normalized as in A to the control, which in this case was OOX cumulus cells. The figure shows the mean and SEM of three independent experiments. * indicates significant difference (P < 0.05) from OOX control. C) Effect of FGOs on the relative steady-state levels of Slc38a3 mRNA in the granulosa cells of preantral follicles. OOX cumulus cells or OOX preantral granulosa cells (PAGC) were cultured with or without FGO (2 oocytes/µl) for 15 h and RNase protection data were normalized to the control as in A, which in this case was OOX cumulus cells or OOX PAGC. The figure shows the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. A significant difference (P < 0.05) from the OOX cumulus cell control is indicated by (*) or from the PAGC control is indicated by (#)

To determine whether the ability of the oocyte to promote Slc38a3 expression by cumulus cells is dependent on the stage of oocyte development, OOX cumulus cells were cocultured with either FGOs (2/µl) or growing oocytes (GOs) (4/µl) isolated from the preantral follicles of 12-day-old mice, and relative steady-state levels of Slc38a3 transcripts present in cumulus cells were determined. The concentration of GO in the cocultures was 4/µl to compensate for an approximate 50% difference in the volume of GOs versus FGOs [14]. FGOs promoted about a 5-fold elevation of Slc38a3 mRNA levels in the cumulus cells, but GOs did not (Fig. 2B). Thus, the ability of oocytes to promote elevated Slc38a3 steady-state mRNA levels in cumulus cells is developmentally regulated.

Little or no expression of Slc38a3 mRNA was detected in the preantral granulosa cells (PAGCs) of 12-day-old mouse ovaries by in situ hybridization (not shown). This raises the question of whether the PAGCs are able to respond to factors from oocytes and elevate steady-state levels of Slc38a3 transcripts. Therefore, OOX cumulus cells (from antral follicles) or OOX PAGCs were cultured either alone or with FGOs for 15 h before assay. Consistent with the results presented previously, FGOs promoted a 7-fold elevation of Slc38a3 mRNA levels by OOX cumulus cells. FGOs also stimulated an elevated level of Slc38a3 mRNA expression in OOX PAGCs (Fig. 2C). Thus, the expression of Slc38a3 mRNA by granulosa cells during follicular development is probably up-regulated by oocytes during their final growth phase, which coincides with their development in late preantral and antral follicles.

Effect of Oocytes on Amino Acid Transport by Granulosa Cells

When Slc38a3 mRNA was injected into Xenopus oocytes, uptake of L-alanine into the frog oocytes was increased 10-fold [9]. This transporter also exhibits a substrate preference for L-histidine and L-glutamine [9]. Therefore, the effect of oocytes on the incorporation of L-alanine and L-histidine into cumulus cells or PAGCs and oocytes was determined. Since transporters in this family do not exhibit a preference for L-leucine [9, 18], the incorporation of this amino acid was also assessed for comparison.

Approximately 15–20% of the L-alanine, L-histidine, and L-leucine incorporated into the intact COC was incorporated into the oocyte, the remainder into the cumulus cells (Fig. 3). However, while about the same amount of L-leucine was incorporated into cumulus cell-denuded oocytes, significantly less L-alanine or L-histidine was incorporated into denuded oocytes compared to cumulus cell-enclosed oocytes (Fig. 3A). These data for L-alanine and L-leucine are consistent with those presented by Colonna and Mangia [7]; however, incorporation of L-histidine was not included in their study. The incorporation of L-alanine and L-histidine but not L-leucine into the oocyte is dependent, either completely or partially, on the participation of cumulus cells and is probably mediated by the gap junctions that metabolically couple oocytes and granulosa cells [8]. Incorporation of all three amino acids into OOX cumulus cells was much less than into the cumulus cells of intact complexes (Fig. 3B). Coculture of OOX cumulus cells with denuded FGOs (2 oocytes/µl) dramatically stimulated incorporation of L-alanine and L-histidine by cumulus cells. For example, about 70% of the total incorporation of L-alanine into the intact COCs was incorporated into the cumulus cells (Fig. 3B). However, incorporation into OOX cumulus cells was only about 3% of the total L-alanine incorporation found in the intact COCs, but incubation of OOX cumulus cells with FGOs increased incorporation to 44% (Fig. 3B). Similar results were obtained when the incorporation of L-histidine was measured (Fig. 3B). FGOs also stimulated incorporation of L-leucine by OOX cumulus cells but not to nearly the same extent as they did for L-alanine and L-histidine (Fig. 3B). Incubation of OOX cumulus cells with FGOs increased L-leucine incorporation from 12% to 20% of the total incorporation into COCs (Fig. 3B). FGOs did not promote the incorporation of any amino acid into OOX cumulus cells to the same extent measured in the cumulus cells of intact complexes, even when the concentration of oocytes used in the coculture was increased to 4/µl (not shown).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Uptake of L-alanine, L-histidine, and L-leucine by cumulus cells and oocytes, and the effect of fully grown oocytes (FGO) on uptake by oocytectomized complex (OOX) cumulus cells. Intact cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC), OOX cumulus cells, cumulus cell-denuded oocytes (DO), and OOX-cumulus cells were cultured for 15 h and then transferred to Whitten medium containing 3 mg/ml BSA and one of the three 3H-labeled amino acids (100 µCi/ml) for 3 h. The counts in each group of cumulus cells or oocytes are expressed as a percentage of the total counts in an intact COC. A) Comparison of the uptake of amino acids into oocytes, cultured either as COCs or as DO. The data show the mean and standard error of the mean of three independent experiments. * indicates a significant difference of DOs (P < 0.05) from the oocytes of the COC groups. B) Uptake of amino acids by cumulus cells from intact COCs, OOX cumulus cells, and OOX cumulus cells cocultured with FGOs (2 oocytes/µl). The data show the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. * indicates a significant (P < 0.05) difference of OOX from cumulus cells of intact COCs. # indicates a significant difference (P < 0.05) of OOX + FGO from OOX cumulus cells

As shown previously, expression of Slc38a3 mRNA in preantral follicles was either undetectable or only slightly above background. Nevertheless, GOs from preantral follicles might secrete factors that promote amino acid uptake, but PAGCs could be unresponsive to them. Therefore, experiments were conducted to determine whether GOs secrete factors that can promote the incorporation of amino acids by OOX-cumulus cells (from antral follicles), which were shown to be responsive to the stimulatory factors from FGOs. The concentration of GO in the cocultures was 4/µl to compensate for an approximate 50% difference in the volume of GOs versus FGOs [14]. As expected, FGOs increased the OOX cumulus cell incorporation of L-alanine by 11.5-fold and L-leucine by 2.3-fold. However, GOs did not promote the incorporation of either amino acid by OOX cumulus cells (Fig. 4A).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Effect of growing oocytes (GO) on amino acid uptake by oocytectomized complex (OOX) cumulus cells (A) or preantral granulosa cells (B). A) OOX cumulus cells were cultured alone (control) or with FGOs (2 oocytes/µl) or GOs (4 oocytes/µl) for 15 h and then transferred to Whitten medium to assess uptake of radiolabeled amino acids over a 3-h incubation. Results are presented as the fold increase of the experimental groups, OOX cumulus cells cocultured with FGOs or GOs, over the uptake by OOX cumulus cells alone. The data are presented as the mean and standard error of the mean of three independent experiments. * indicates a significant difference (P < 0.05) from the OOX cumulus cell control. B) Effect of GOs on amino acid uptake by preantral granulosa cells (PAGCs). PAGCs were cultured alone (control) or with FGOs (2 oocytes/µl) or GOs (4 oocytes/µl) for 15 h and then transferred to Whitten medium to assess uptake of radiolabeled amino acids over a 3-h incubation. Results are presented as the fold increase of the experimental groups, PAGCs cocultured with FGOs or GOs, over the PAGCs alone. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. * indicates a significant difference (P < 0.05) from the PAGC control

The relatively low level of expression of Slc38a3 mRNA by PAGCs could be due either to the failure of GOs to promote expression, as shown previously, or to the inability of PAGCs to respond to the stimulus or both. FGOs not only were able stimulate elevation in the steady-state levels of Slc38a3 mRNA (Fig. 2) but also promoted a 40-fold increase in the incorporation of L-alanine into OOX-PAGCs (Fig. 4B). Nevertheless, FGOs did not promote the uptake of L-leucine into OOX-PAGCs (Fig. 4B).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Suppression subtraction hybridization detected differential expression of Slc38a3 mRNA between cumulus cells and MGCs. This was confirmed by in situ hybridization; expression was low in the preantral follicles of 12-day-old mouse ovaries, increased in PAGCs of larger preantral follicles in 22-day-old mice primed with eCG, and was in both MGCs and cumulus cells in early antral follicles. With growth and development of antral follicles, expression of Slc38a3 mRNA became progressively localized only to the cumulus cells, with little or no expression detected in the MGCs of large antral follicles (Fig. 1C). FGOs from antral follicles, but not GOs from preantral follicles, promoted elevated steady-state levels of Slc38a3 mRNA in cumulus cells and PAGCs. Therefore, the expression of Slc38a3 mRNA in granulosa cells is regulated by oocytes according to the stage of oocyte development.

SLC38A3 is a sodium-coupled neutral amino acid transporter exhibiting a preference for L-glutamate, L-histidine, and L-alanine but not for L-leucine [9]. In the absence of FGOs, cumulus cell incorporation of L-alanine, L-histidine, and L-leucine was greatly reduced. FGOs cocultured with OOX cumulus cells greatly stimulated the incorporation of L-alanine and L-histidine but stimulated the uptake of L-leucine to a much lesser extent. FGOs were unable to restore the incorporation of any of the amino acids to levels measured in the intact COC even though the steady-state levels of Slc38a3 mRNA were elevated to levels similar to that of the intact COC. Thus, paracrine factors from FGOs stimulate cumulus cell incorporation of amino acids, particularly the amino acids categorized as coupling dependent, and are taken up poorly by the oocyte itself. Maximal incorporation of amino acids by cumulus cells appears to require contact with the oocyte. The most extreme example of this is the uptake of L-leucine by cumulus cells. Expression of Amh mRNA by granulosa cells also appears largely dependent on contact or very close association with the oocyte, particularly in PAGCs, but also in cumulus cells [19]. This apparent requirement for contact between oocytes and granulosa cells for maximum expression of Amh mRNA or for amino acid uptake by the granulosa cells may be dependent on gap junction-mediated signaling. Such signals originating in the granulosa cells may promote the secretion of paracrine factors by the oocyte that, in turn, enhance granulosa cell function in a regulatory loop.

Although it is tempting to assume that the uptake of L-alanine and L-histidine into cumulus cells depends on expression of Slc38a3 mRNA, there is no direct evidence presented here that these are linked. Considering the many transporters involved in amino acid uptake, it is likely that SLC38A3 is only one of several transporters involved in the uptake of these amino acids by cumulus cells. In fact, studies in progress in our laboratory suggest that cumulus cells also express the transporter SLC38A5, and this transporter appears to have a similar substrate preference to SLC38A3 in rats [20].

In addition to Slc38a3, the expression of six genes (Aldoa, Eno1, Ldh1, Pfkp, Pkm2, and Tpi1), encoding enzymes participating in the glycolysis pathway, is greater in cumulus cells than MGCs [6]. It is well documented from classical studies that mouse oocytes, as well as preimplantation embryos, are deficient in their ability to metabolize glucose and that the products of glycolysis provided by the cumulus cells are essential for oocyte development [35]. The steady-state levels of all these transcripts encoding glycolytic enzymes are elevated by paracrine factors produced by FGOs but not GOs. Thus, before the LH surge, oocytes probably promote the expression of genes, including Slc38a3 and genes encoding glycolysis enzymes, in cumulus cells that, in turn, are beneficial for oocyte development. Although the role of such gene products in oocyte development is not always obvious, promoting expression of genes involved in amino acid transport, particularly the transport of coupling-dependent amino acids, seems evident. In fact, FGOs promote the incorporation of the coupling-dependent amino acids L-alanine and L-histidine to a significantly greater extent than the coupling independent amino acid L-leucine. The increase in oocyte volume is the greatest in the later stages of preantral follicle and early antral follicle development [13], and the demand for amino acids to support oocyte growth must be greatest at this time. Since oocytes are deficient in their ability to transport some amino acids, such as L-alanine and L-histidine, they probably become increasingly dependent on the cumulus cells to provide them. In effect, oocytes may use the cumulus cell membrane as specialized extension of the oolemma and the coupling gap junctions as means of conveyance. The studies reported here show that oocytes enhance incorporation of crucial amino acids via signals using both paracrine factors and contact-mediated communication. At least part of the enhancement mechanism involves up-regulation of cumulus cell transcripts, such as Slc38a3 and those from genes encoding glycolytic enzymes.

Oocytes regulate the rate of ovarian follicular development [21]. This is most dramatically illustrated by the fact that reaggregation of partly grown oocytes from preantral follicles with the somatic cells of newborn ovaries, which contain only primordial follicles, resulted in a doubling of the rate of follicular development [21]. It is probable that this regulation is mediated by paracrine factors from the oocyte, such as GDF9 and BMP15, and by signals transmitted by contact-mediated mechanisms, such as through gap junctions. Signals originating in the oocyte not only affect the rate of follicular development but also profoundly affect the differentiation of granulosa cells. This is evidenced by the oocyte's influence on different patterns of gene expression among the granulosa cells at different times and in the various populations of granulosa cells. Fully grown oocytes promote the untimely expression of Slc38a3 mRNA and greatly enhance the uptake of coupling-dependent amino acids by preantral granulosa cells. This is an example of how oocytes can drive the precocious development of granulosa cells to ensure the coordination of oocyte and granulosa cell development. Similarly, the ability of oocytes to control energy metabolism by granulosa cells is another mechanism that could regulate the rate of follicular development [6].

The developmental coordination between the oocyte and the somatic components of the follicle ensures that both are at appropriate stages of maturation. Thus, a developmentally competent oocyte is available to be ovulated at the same time that the follicle is competent to undertake the ovulatory process in response to LH. In fact, the oocyte itself plays a key role in the ovulatory process since GDF9 produced by the oocyte is required to promote the production of hyaluronic acid and other factors by cumulus cells that are necessary for ovulation [1, 2]. We propose that oocytes promote the expression of genes involved in cellular metabolism, such as Slc38a3 and the genes encoding glycolysis enzymes [6], to achieve two goals. First, some of these gene products are not produced by the oocyte itself, and promoting the expression of these genes in cumulus cells enhances aspects of metabolic cooperation between the granulosa cells and the oocyte that are essential for the development of the oocyte. Second, the oocytes use their ability to regulate metabolic pathways in the granulosa cells to orchestrate the rate of follicular development.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors are grateful to Drs. Wes Beamer, Francisco Diaz, Mary Ann Handel, You-Qiang Su, and Koji Sugiura for their helpful suggestions in the preparation of this paper.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD23839). Back

2 Correspondence. FAX: 207 288 6073; jje{at}jax.org Back

Received: 9 March 2005.

First decision: 26 March 2005.

Accepted: 18 April 2005.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Eppig JJ. Oocyte control of ovarian follicular development and function in mammals. Reproduction 2001 122:829-838[Abstract]
  2. Matzuk MM, Burns KH, Viveiros MM, Eppig JJ. Intercellular communication in the mammalian ovary: oocytes carry the conversation. Science 2002 296:2178-2180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Biggers JD, Whittingham DG, Donahue RP. The pattern of energy metabolism in the mouse oocyte and zygote. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1967 58:560-567[Free Full Text]
  4. Donahue RP, Stern S. Follicular cell support of oocyte maturation: production of pyruvate in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1968 17:395-398
  5. Leese HJ, Barton AM. Production of pyruvate by isolated mouse cumulus cells. J Exp Zool 1985 234:231-236[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Sugiura K, Pendola FL, Eppig JJ. Oocyte regulation of metabolic cooperativity between oocytes and companion granulosa cells: energy metabolism. Dev Biol 2005 279:20-30[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Colonna R, Mangia F. Mechanisms of amino acid uptake in cumulus-enclosed mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 1983 28:797-803[Abstract]
  8. Haghighat N, Van Winkle LJ. Developmental change in follicular cell-enhanced amino acid uptake into mouse oocytes that depends on intact gap junctions and transport system. Gly J Exp Zool 1990 253:71-82
  9. Gu S, Roderick HL, Camacho P, Jiang JX. Identification and characterization of an amino acid transporter expressed differentially in liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000 97:3230-3235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Joyce IM, Pendola FL, O'Brien M, Eppig JJ. Regulation of prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 messenger ribonucleic acid expression in mouse granulosa cells during ovulation. Endocrinology 2001 142:3187-3197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Joyce IM, Pendola FL, Wigglesworth K, Eppig JJ. Oocyte regulation of kit ligand expression in mouse ovarian follicles. Dev Biol 1999 214:342-353[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Eppig JJ. Analysis of mouse oogenesis in vitro: oocyte isolation and the utilization of exogenous energy sources by growing oocytes. J Exp Zool 1976 198:375-386[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Eppig JJ, Schroeder AC. Capacity of mouse oocytes from preantral follicles to undergo embryogenesis and development to live young after growth, maturation and fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod 1989 41:268-276[Abstract]
  14. Chesnel F, Eppig JJ. Synthesis and accumulation of p34cdc2 and cyclin B in mouse oocytes during acquisition of competence to resume meiosis. Mol Reprod Dev 1995 40:503-508[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Eppig JJ, Wigglesworth K, Pendola FL, Hirao Y. Murine oocytes suppress expression of luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid by granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 1997 56:976-984[Abstract]
  16. Whitten WK. Nutrient requirements for culture of preimplantation embryos in vitro. Adv Biosci 1971 6:129-139
  17. Eppig JJ. The relationship between cumulus cell-oocyte coupling, oocyte meiotic maturation, and cumulus expansion. Dev Biol 1982 89:268-272[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Mackenzie B, Erickson JD. Sodium-coupled neutral amino acid (System N/A) transporters of the SLC38 gene family. Pflugers Arch 2004 447:784-795[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Salmon NA, Handyside AH, Joyce IM. Oocyte regulation of anti-Mullerian hormone expression in granulosa cells during ovarian follicle development in mice. Dev Biol 2004 266:201-208[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Nakanishi T, Kekuda R, Fei YJ, Hatanaka T, Sugawara M, Martindale RG, Leibach FH, Prasad PD, Ganapathy V. Cloning and functional characterization of a new subtype of the amino acid transport system. N Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2001 281:C1757-C1768
  21. Eppig JJ, Wigglesworth K, Pendola FL. The mammalian oocyte orchestrates the rate of ovarian follicular development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002 99:2890-2894[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. X. Yeo, R. B. Gilchrist, and M. Lane
Disruption of Bidirectional Oocyte-Cumulus Paracrine Signaling During In Vitro Maturation Reduces Subsequent Mouse Oocyte Developmental Competence
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2009; 80(5): 1072 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
A. M. Ratchford, C. R. Esguerra, and K. H. Moley
Decreased Oocyte-Granulosa Cell Gap Junction Communication and Connexin Expression in a Type 1 Diabetic Mouse Model
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 22(12): 2643 - 2654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Bettegowda, O. V. Patel, K.-B. Lee, K.-E. Park, M. Salem, J. Yao, J. J. Ireland, and G. W. Smith
Identification of Novel Bovine Cumulus Cell Molecular Markers Predictive of Oocyte Competence: Functional and Diagnostic Implications
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 301 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R. B. Gilchrist, M. Lane, and J. G. Thompson
Oocyte-secreted factors: regulators of cumulus cell function and oocyte quality
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 159 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. X. Yeo, R. B. Gilchrist, J. G. Thompson, and M. Lane
Exogenous growth differentiation factor 9 in oocyte maturation media enhances subsequent embryo development and fetal viability in mice
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 67 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
Y.-Q. Su, K. Sugiura, K. Wigglesworth, M. J. O'Brien, J. P. Affourtit, S. A. Pangas, M. M. Matzuk, and J. J. Eppig
Oocyte regulation of metabolic cooperativity between mouse cumulus cells and oocytes: BMP15 and GDF9 control cholesterol biosynthesis in cumulus cells
Development, January 1, 2008; 135(1): 111 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
F. J Diaz, K. Sugiura, and J. J Eppig
Regulation of Pcsk6 Expression During the Preantral to Antral Follicle Transition in Mice: Opposing Roles of FSH and Oocytes
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2008; 78(1): 176 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
T. Y. Li, D. Colley, K. J. Barr, S.-P. Yee, and G. M. Kidder
Rescue of oogenesis in Cx37-null mutant mice by oocyte-specific replacement with Cx43
J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2007; 120(23): 4117 - 4125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Feuerstein, V. Cadoret, R. Dalbies-Tran, F. Guerif, R. Bidault, and D. Royere
Gene expression in human cumulus cells: one approach to oocyte competence
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3069 - 3077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S. E Harris, I. Adriaens, H. J Leese, R. G Gosden, and H. M Picton
Carbohydrate metabolism by murine ovarian follicles and oocytes grown in vitro
Reproduction, September 1, 2007; 134(3): 415 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. L. Russell and R. L. Robker
Molecular mechanisms of ovulation: co-ordination through the cumulus complex
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 289 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
F. J. Diaz, K. Wigglesworth, and J. J. Eppig
Oocytes determine cumulus cell lineage in mouse ovarian follicles
J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2007; 120(8): 1330 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Ebner, M. Moser, M. Sommergruber, O. Shebl, and G. Tews
Incomplete denudation of oocytes prior to ICSI enhances embryo quality and blastocyst development
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2972 - 2977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. J. Schweigert, B. Gericke, W. Wolfram, U. Kaisers, and J. W. Dudenhausen
Peptide and protein profiles in serum and follicular fluid of women undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2960 - 2968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
Y. Xing, R. Gosden, P. Lasko, and H. Clarke
Murine homologues of the Drosophila gustavus gene are expressed in ovarian granulosa cells.
Reproduction, May 1, 2006; 131(5): 905 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
G. FitzHarris and J. M. Baltz
Granulosa cells regulate intracellular pH of the murine growing oocyte via gap junctions: development of independent homeostasis during oocyte growth
Development, February 15, 2006; 133(4): 591 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
73/2/351    most recent
biolreprod.105.041798v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eppig, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pendola, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eppig, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pendola, J. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eppig, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pendola, J. K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS