|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for Reproductive Biology, School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
epididymis, estradiol, sperm, testis, testosterone
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, male reproductive tract cystatins lack some or all of the conserved regions, including the N-terminal glycine, a glutamine-valine-glycine (QXVXG) motif in the first hairpin loop, and the proline-tryptophan (PW) motif in the second hairpin loop thought to be critical for binding to a cysteine proteinase of the papain family [16]. This suggests that the specificity of the members in this subgroup may be quite different from the typical family 2 cystatins. Recently, it was reported that, in in vitro assays, recombinant CST8 did not inhibit the cysteine proteinase papain or cathepsin B; instead, it inhibited the serine proteinase prohormone convertase 2 (PC2), a proteinase involved in prohormone processing in the neuroendocrine system [17]. Moreover, unlike the ubiquitous expression pattern of most family 2 cystatins, the members in this subgroup are predominantly expressed in the male reproductive tract and exhibit tissue- and cell-specificity, with some of them exhibiting a stage-specific expression in testis [6]. These data indicate that male reproductive tract cystatins may have evolved from the archetypal cystatins to perform tissue- and cell-specific functions.
The biological function of male reproductive tract cystatins is not understood. However, it has been suggested that CST8 may perform a role in regulation of intra-acrosomal protein processing or may be involved in fertilization and the gonadotrope-mediated control of reproduction [18 20]. The expression of the Cst9 gene is upregulated in male gonads but downregulated in female gonads immediately after initiation of sex differentiation, suggesting roles in the early developmental cascade of the testis [9, 21]. CST 11, the human ortholog of mouse CST 11 (also referred to as CST E1 or CRES2), was recently shown to exhibit antimicrobial activity [13], suggesting a functional relationship with the defensins and the possibility that subgroup members may be multifunctional.
In previous studies, we identified a member of male reproductive tract cystatins, Cst12 (previously described as Cst TE-1, for cystatin-related gene highly expressed in testis and epididymis) [10]. The deduced amino acid sequence of mouse CST12 lacks all the short conserved motifs thought to be critical for the cysteine proteinase inhibitory activity. Cst12 transcripts are localized to the Sertoli cells in the testis without apparent stage-dependent expression and to the epithelial cells of the proximal caput epididymis, suggesting that CST12 may play a specialized role in the testis and epididymis [10]. In this study, we analyzed CST12 protein in the testis and epididymis and the hormonal regulation of Cst12 mRNA in epididymis.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All mice used in these studies were adult BL/6-129 male mice (46 mo old). They were generated and maintained as a breeder colony at the Washington State University (Pullman, WA). Animals were housed under a 12L:12D cycle in a standard animal facility with free access to food and water. All animal procedures were conducted according to the guidelines stated in the United States Public Health Service's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Expression of a Recombinant His-CST12 Fusion Protein in Bacteria and Production of Polyclonal Antiserum
A CST12 fusion protein with a 6x histidine-tag (His-CST12) was synthesized using the QIAexpress bacterial expression system from Qiagen (Valencia, CA). Briefly, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using forward primer 5'-CGAGATCGACAAGAATGAAGAGGAG-3' and reverse primer 5'-CACTTAAGTCTGCACACAGGTGCTG-3,' was performed to produce a mouse Cst12 cDNA without the predicted signal peptide sequence and the first three amino acid residues. The PCR product was inserted into the pQE-30 vector digested with SmaI to generate a 6x His-CST12 coding sequence. A His-CST12 fusion protein was expressed in E. coli M15 (pREP4) and purified using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography following the manufacturer's recommendation (Qiagen). Sequence of purified recombinant His-CST12 fusion protein was confirmed by amino acid sequencing.
To raise polyclonal antibody, a New Zealand rabbit was injected subcutaneously with 1 mg of purified His-CST12 fusion protein in 1.5 ml Freund complete adjuvant. The rabbit was boosted with 0.5 mg fusion protein in Freund incomplete adjuvant 28 days later. An affinity-purified CST12 polyclonal antibody (mainly IgG), as well as IgG from preimmune serum, was generated by using a protein A Sepharose column (Pierce, Rockford, IL) following the instructions of the manufacturer.
Western Blot Analysis
Purified recombinant His-CST12, His-CST SC, His-CST E2 and His-CST13 protein was separated by 15% SDS-PAGE followed by transfer to PolyVinyliDine Fluoride (PVDF) membrane (0.22 µm). The membrane was blocked in 1x PBS with 5% nonfat milk for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with affinity-purified CST12 polyclonal antibody (1:400) overnight at 4°C. Control blots were incubated with IgG purified from preimmune serum (1:400) or an affinity-purified CST12 antibody that has been previously incubated with the His-CST12 protein. After incubation, the membranes were rinsed three times with 1x PBS and incubated with horseradish peroxidase conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG for 1 h at room temperature, followed by three rinses with 1x PBS. Crossreactive proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence (ECL; Amersham, Piscataway, NJ). To obtain the protein-loading control, the membrane, after Western blot analysis, was incubated in stripping buffer containing 65 mM Tris.HCl, pH 6.7, 100 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS at 50°C for 1 h, and stained in 40% methanol, 7% acetic acid and 0.025% Coomassie blue R-250 for 2 min and then destained in 40% methanol, 7% acetic acid until the protein bands were resolved.
Immunohistochemistry
Testes and epididymides were removed from 129 3- to 4-mo-old mice and fixed in freshly prepared 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA)/0.25% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (GA) overnight at 4°C. The tissues were embedded in paraffin wax and the sections (6 µm) were mounted on Probe-on-Plus microscope slides (Fisher Scientific Co., Pittsburgh, PA). After deparaffinization in xylene, the sections were exposed to 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 10 min to block any endogenous peroxide activity from the tissue. Following rehydration in decreasing concentrations of ethanol, sections were boiled in 0.01 M sodium citrate, pH 6.0, for 12 min and cooled to room temperature slowly to expose the antigenic epitopes on the sections. For immunohistological staining, the Zymed LAB-SA system (Zymed Laboratory Inc., South San Francisco, CA) was used following the protocol the manufacturer provided with modifications. Briefly, 10% goat serum was used as blocking solution and the affinity-purified CST12 polyclonal antibody was diluted to 1:500 in 10% goat serum. Tissue sections and antibody were incubated together for 2 h at room temperature in a humidified chamber. The slides were then rinsed with PBS three times and incubated with diluted biotinylated secondary antibody for 45 min, followed by the application of streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase. The AEC substrate kit (Zymed) was applied until red color developed, and then sections were rinsed with water to stop the chromogen-substrate reaction. The slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin for 45 seconds and mounted with GVA mounting solution (Zymed). Control sections were incubated with IgG purified from preimmune serum (1:500) or an affinity-purified CST12 antibody that was incubated previously with the His-CST12 protein. Sections were observed with a Nikon Microphot-FX (Meridian Instrument Company Inc., Kent, WA) microscope. Photomicrographs were taken with an Olympus OLY-200 digital camera (Olympus America Inc.) using Olympus MagnaFire Camera Imaging and Control version 1.0 (Olympus America).
Sperm Preparation and Indirect Immunofluorescence
A pure population of testicular spermatozoa was obtained by ligating the efferent duct proximal to the testis for 1820 h and cutting near the site of ligation. Spermatozoon and rete testis fluid was gently extruded into 500 µl of Hanks medium (Invitrogen Corp. Carlsbad, CA) prewarmed to 37°C and washed with the same medium once before resuspending into Hanks medium at a concentration of 5 x 105/ml. The spermatozoa were then smeared onto Superfrost Plus slides and air dried.
Mouse epididymal spermatozoa were obtained by mincing caput, corpus, or cauda epididymides with scissors into approximately 5 ml of prewarmed Hanks medium. The sperm were washed with same medium once and diluted to approximately 5 x 105/ml and air dried onto slides.
Testicular and epididymal spermatozoa were fixed and permeabilized with 95% methanol:5% glacial acetic acid for 30 min at 20°C. After fixation, spermatozoa were washed with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBS-T) and incubated with 10% goat serum at 37°C for 1 h in a humidified chamber to block nonspecific binding. The slides were then incubated with a polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse CST12 antibody (1:400 in 10% goat serum) overnight at 4°C followed by 3 x 5 min washes in PBS-T. The spermatozoa were incubated in a dark container with a fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100; Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) at room temperature for 1 h. The slides were then washed in PBS-T three times and in PBS (pH 8.5) once. Control samples were incubated with IgG purified from preimmune serum (1:400), or secondary antibody alone (1:100). Coverslips with mounting solution containing propodium iodide (Vector) were used to cover the slides. The slides were then examined using a Nikon Microphot-FX microscope equipped with epifluorescence.
Castration, Hormone Replacement and Unilateral Efferent Duct Ligation
Orchidectomies and unilateral efferent duct ligations were done under an i.p. injection of 0.1 mg/kg ketamine-0.05 mg/kg xylene anesthesia and all ligations and sutures were done using nonabsorbable braided #6-0 silk (Surgical Specialist Corp., Reading, PA). Adult mice were castrated at Day 0 and testosterone and/or estrogen replacements were performed at the time of castration. Experimental mice (n = 3 per group) received a daily subcutaneous injection of 3 mg of testosterone propionate (T; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) and/or 17ß-estradiol (E; Sigma) dissolved in 100µl sterile sesame seed oil as a vehicle [22]. Control mice (n = 3 per group) received daily injections of 100µl vehicle only. For sham operation (n = 3 per group), testis and epididymis were manipulated and returned into the tunica vaginalis and animals received 100 µl vehicle every day after surgery. Mice were sacrificed on Day 4, Day 7 and Day 14 after surgery. Plasma T/E levels were determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA) at the Center for Reproductive Biology RIA Core laboratory at Washington State University, using kits obtained from Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc. (Webster, TX). Unilateral efferent ductule ligation was performed by ligating the junction between the left testicular rete testis and the epididymis without compromising testicular or epididymal blood supply [23]. As a control, the right testis was manipulated similarly to the left, but its efferent ductules were not ligated. Epididymides were removed on Days 1, 2, 3, 7 and 10 postligation (n = 3 per group) and put in Trizol for RNA extraction. All the experiments were performed at least twice.
Northern Blot Analysis and Statistical Analysis
Epididymides from experimental animals were homogenized in Trizol reagent (Invitrogen Corp.) and RNA was extracted following the manufacturer's recommendations. Seven micrograms of total RNA isolated from epididymides were fractionated on a 1.0% agarose/formaldehyde gel and transferred to Hybond N membranes (Amersham). Northern blot analysis was carried out as previously described [12] with the following modifications. Mouse Cst12 cDNA (540 bp) was radiolabeled using the Rad Prime DNA Labeling Kit (Invitrogen). The blots were hybridized in a hybridization solution consisting of 1% BSA, 7% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.2 and 1 x 106 cpm/ml of corresponding cDNA probe overnight at 65°C. After hybridization, the blots were exposed to a phosphor screen (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) for 1648 h. The signals were analyzed using a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager 445 SI, ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics) and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Richmond, WA). The levels of Cst12 mRNA were measured in all mice; the bars in the figures indicate mean ± SEM for all hybridizations of experiments. Differences between groups were statistically analyzed by either Student t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by a Student-Newman-Keul test. The mean differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The purity of His-CST12 protein was determined by 15% SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Blue R-250 staining. Western blot analysis was performed to examine cross-reaction between CST12 antibody and several known cystatins sharing similarity with CST12 protein. As shown in Figure 1, the purified His-CST12 protein was more than 95% pure and anti-CST12 antibody recognized this band, which was about 17.5 kDa. No cross-reaction between CST12 antibody and CST SC or CST E2 protein was detected. Cross-reactivity between anti-CST12 antibody and CST13 protein was noticed.
|
Immunolocalization of CST12 Protein in Adult Mouse Testis
To examine the localization of CST12 protein in testis, cross sections of testis were examined using anti-CST12 antibody and visualized by the technique described in Materials and Methods. As shown in Figure 2, intense CST12 staining in the testis was localized to Sertoli cells and displayed a stage-dependent pattern. The limited immunostaining was found in stages VIIVIII of seminiferous tubules (Fig. 2A). Higher magnification (Fig. 2B) revealed that CST12 protein was highly expressed in the cytoplasm of the Sertoli cells in stages IIIII of seminiferous tubules; similar expression level and localization were observed in other stages, but not in stages VIIVIII. The protein level decreased dramatically in the cytoplasm of Sertoli cells in stage VII seminiferous epithelium. Therefore, the signal in Sertoli cells decreased dramatically during spermiation and increased immediately after spermiation. Weak peroxidase reaction was also observed in some pachytene spermatocytes and in elongating and elongated spermatids. No detectable peroxidase reaction was observed in spermatogonia or interstitial tissues (Fig. 2B). No specific immunostaining was detected on the cross section incubated with preimmune serum (Fig. 2C) or on the CST12 antibody preincubated with CST12 protein (data not shown).
|
Immunolocalization of CST12 Protein in Adult Mouse Epididymis
In our previous studies, we demonstrated by Northern blot analysis and in situ hybridization that Cst12 mRNA was restricted to the epithelial cells of the proximal caput region of the epididymis (initial segment) [10]. To examine the localization of CST12 protein in epididymis, longitudinal sections of the mouse epididymis were incubated with an anti-CST12 antibody and visualized for CST12 protein by immunoperoxidase staining. As shown in Figure 3, the intracellular localization of the CST12 protein in the caput epididymis closely parallels the localization of the Cst12 mRNA. Specifically, the CST12 protein was detected at high levels in the epithelial cells of the initial segment of caput epididymis (Caput I). A higher magnification of the Caput I showed CST12 protein was localized to the cytoplasm of all the epithelial cells with a higher level in the apical region of the cells and secreted to the lumen. No obvious staining was detected in the nuclei of epithelial cells. In the next immediate region, Caput II, only some, not all, of the epithelial cells were immunostained. The staining was random and some of the principal cells and basal cells were stained and other principal cells and basal cells were not stained. The level of immunostaining was significantly less than that observed in Caput I. In Caput III, the immunostaining was barely detectable in the epithelial cells but present in the lumen. In the neck region of Caput IV and the very proximal corpus (Pcorpus) epididymis, CST12 protein was primarily localized to the lumen at very high levels, with little staining found in the epithelial lining. In the corpus, the localization of CST12 protein changed among the epididymal tubules. In some tubules, CST12 protein was localized to the apical region of principal cells and some of the basal cells with only slight staining in the lumen (Corpus I). In other tubules, CST12 protein was mainly localized in the lumen with very little present in epithelial cells (Corpus II). Similar to the corpus region, the localization of CST12 protein also varied among the epididymal tubules in cauda epididymis. However, the immunostaining was much weaker in the cauda region (Cauda) than in other regions of epididymis. The CST12 protein was also detected in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells in the vas deferens. Epididymis incubated with preimmune serum (Neg), secondary antibody only, or CST12 antibody that was preincubated with CST12 protein showed no immunostaining (data not shown), demonstrating the high specificity of the CST12 antibody.
|
Localization of CST12 Protein in Mouse Spermatozoa
CST12 protein was detected in the testis and epididymis, suggesting this protein may interact with spermatozoa during transit from testis to the cauda epididymis. Indirect immunofluorescence analysis was carried out to determine whether CST12 protein was associated with testicular or epididymal spermatozoa. Mouse spermatozoa obtained from rete testis and four regions of epididymis were fixed, permeated and incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse CST12 antibody followed by a fluorescein-conjugate goat-anti-rabbit secondary antibody. As shown in Figure 4A, a green fluorescent signal representing CST12 protein was detected in the cytoplasmic droplets of the testicular spermatozoa located near the sperm neck along the midpiece of the sperm tail. Figure 4B shows that in corpus and cauda spermatozoa, the immunofluorescence was located in the cytoplasmic droplets that migrated to the distal region near the annulus, at the midpiece-principal piece juncture. Cell counts showed that 77% of testicular sperm, 34% of caput (Caput I, II and III; see Fig. 3 "Caput"), 33% of corpus, and 27% of cauda epididymal sperm were positive. About 61% of sperm from the neck region between Caput IV and Pcorpus were immunostained, which is consistent with the results shown in Figure 3. Very weak fluorescent signal was observed in the acrosomal cap region and negative controls, indicating sperm autofluorescence. Sperm nuclei were stained red by propodium iodide in the mounting solution.
|
Regulation of Cst12 Gene Expression
The effect of castration on Cst12 mRNA level was determined using Northern blot analysis (Fig. 5). Total RNA extracted from the epididymides at 4 and 7 days postcastration was hybridized with the 32P-radiolabelled Cst12 cDNA probes. High levels of transcripts were detected in the epididymis of intact animals. Cst12 transcripts decreased by 46% of sham level on Day 7 postcastration. Serum testosterone levels were 1.627 ng/ml on Day 0 and were undetectable (<0.05 ng/ml) by Day 7 postcastration. To determine whether exogenous testosterone can restore Cst12 expression in the epididymides of castrated mice, T was administered to mice at the time of castration in a T maintenance paradigm. The daily administration of T for 7 days did not result in any recovery of Cst12 gene expression. Instead, T treatment further repressed the expression of this gene in the epididymis to 24% of sham level and 52% of castrated level following castration. This suggests that hormones other than T or other testicular factors upregulate Cst12 gene expression. Epididymal retinoic acid-binding protein (ERabp), which has been reported to be upregulated by testosterone in epididymis [24], was used as a control to confirm the epididymal response to T treatment.
|
To test for possible contributions of testicular factors to the regulation of gene expression, unilateral efferent duct ligation was used to prevent the flow of testicular fluid into one epididymis. After ligation, Cst12 mRNA levels in the isolated epididymis decreased dramatically. As shown in Figure 6, on Days 7 and 10 postligation, the Cst12 mRNA in the ligated epididymis was reduced to 15% of that in the nonligated epididymis, and to about 22% of that in the nonligated epididymis on Day 1 postligation (near-sham level, the mRNA level of CST12 in the nonligated epididymis on Day 1 postligation is close to the sham level shown in Fig. 5).
|
Testicular factors include a variety of molecules found in the seminiferous tubular fluid, such as luminal androgens [25], androgen-binding proteins [26], estrogen [27], growth factors [28], and probably unknown molecules as well. To determine whether estrogen regulates the expression of Cst12 expression, we treated the castrated mice with E or E + T for 1 and 2 wk. As shown in Figure 7, Cst12 mRNA levels decreased to 43% of intact levels after 7 days of castration, but E treatment for 1 wk resulted in a full recovery of Cst12 mRNA levels. E + T treatment for 1 wk, however, failed to recover the Cst12 mRNA level. Castration for two weeks failed to change Cst12 mRNA levels significantly when compared to intact levels. However, in castrated mice, E treatment alone for 14 days increased Cst12 mRNA levels to 180% of those in sham-operated mice. E + T administration for 14 days failed to recover the Cst12 mRNA levels. The RIA analysis showed that circulating levels of T and E were undetectable in mice by Day 7 postcastration and were at least 10- to 20-fold higher in treated mice than those in sham-operated animals. In situ hybridization showed similar regulation of Cst12 mRNA by T and/or E treatment in epididymis, and no regional changes in Cst12 mRNA signal were observed after treatment (data not shown).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sertoli cells produce specific products to form a unique and essential environment in the adluminal compartment that is necessary for germ cell survival and development [29]. Sertoli cells synthesize and secrete many different proteinases and proteinase inhibitors [30], and one of the functions ascribed to this class of proteins involves extensive tissue remodeling that occurs when tight junctions must be traversed or when spermatozoa are released from the seminiferous epithelium [31]. However, the CST12 protein lacks all of the conserved regions thought to be critical for binding to a cysteine proteinase of the papain family [16]. This suggests that the specificity of this protein may be quite different from the typical family 2 cystatins. Recently, it was reported that in in vitro assays, recombinant CST8 did not inhibit the cysteine proteinase papain or cathepsin B. Instead, it inhibited the serine proteinase prohormone convertase 2 (PC2), a proteinase involved in prohormone processing in the neuroendocrine system [17]. This raises a possibility that CST12 may also function as a proteinase inhibitor but not as a cysteine proteinase inhibitor. Immunohistochemistry reveals that CST12 protein was highly expressed in the Sertoli cells and showed a stage-dependent pattern in seminiferous tubules. However, no difference in Cst12 mRNA levels among seminiferous tubules was detected by in situ hybridization analysis [10, 11], suggesting a posttranscriptional or translational regulation of the Cst12 gene. This observation indicates that CST12 protein synthesis is under strict regulation in Sertoli cells and CST12 plays a specialized role during spermatogenesis. No or very little Cst12 mRNA signal was detected in developing germ cells in the seminiferous tubules using in situ hybridization [10]. However, weak immunostaining was observed in nuclei of some pachytene spermatocytes, cytoplasm of elongating spermatids and elongated spermatids. It is hard to determine if the protein was synthesized in the developing germ cells or acquired from Sertoli cells by germ cells during germ cell-Sertoli cell interaction.
Because spermatozoa entering epididymis are, for the most part, synthetically inactive, the process of sperm maturation resulting in progressive motility and fertility is thought to involve the interaction of spermatozoa with proteins that are synthesized and secreted by the epididymal epithelium [32]. The localization of CST12 protein in the caput epididymis closely parallels the localization of the Cst12 mRNA [10]. The CST12 protein was highly expressed in the initial segment of epididymis and decreased dramatically in the next immediate region, suggesting that CST12 protein synthesis had significantly decreased. The intense staining in the neck region indicates that the secreted CST12 protein accumulated in and plays a special role related to the function of this region. The concentration and localization of CST12 protein varies in different regions of the epididymis, suggesting that CST12 can be reabsorbed and released by epithelial cells to control the protein interaction with spermatozoa during passage through the epididymis. These observations indicate that CST12 protein plays a highly specialized role during sperm maturation.
The presence of CST12 protein in testis and epididymis prompted us to examine whether CST12 protein was associated with testicular or epididymal sperm. In the present study our analysis using indirect immunofluorescence demonstrated that CST12 protein is present in the cytoplasmic droplets that locate along the midpiece near the neck of testicular spermatozoa and migrate from neck to midpiece-principal piece junction (annulus) during proximal epididymal transport. We speculate that Sertoli cells synthesize and secrete CST12 protein, which can be picked up by germ cells during germ cell-Sertoli cell interaction and can also be adsorbed from the lumen by testicular spermatozoa. Also, spermatozoa in the epididymis can release and reabsorb this protein secreted by epididymal epithelium during their epididymal transit. The role of the cytoplasmic droplet, which remains on the majority of sperm in the epididymis [33], is still unclear. However, several glycolytic enzymes have been localized to the cytoplasmic droplet, suggesting a relationship to lysosomal activity [34, 35]. The identification of active P450 aromatase in the cytoplasmic droplet of several species has led to the implication of estrogens in the regulation of sperm maturation in the epididymis [36]. Recently, Cooper and Yeung suggested a role for cytoplasmic droplets in sperm volume regulation which is crucial for fertility [33]. The percentage of CST12-positive sperm was much higher in the caput-corpus neck region than any other region of epididymis, suggesting CST12 protein performs a role specifically related to the function of this neck region during sperm maturation.
Several proteinase inhibitors or putative proteinase inhibitors have been identified in the epididymis [3743], including several male reproductive tract cystatins, such as CST 11 {also named CST E1 or CRES2 in mouse, [11 13]}, CST E2 [12], and CST8 [19]. The synthesis and localization of CST 11 and CST E2 proteins in vivo is unclear. CST8 protein is exclusively synthesized by the proximal caput epithelium in the epididymis and secreted into the lumen [8]. It is mainly localized in the sperm acrosomal cap and released after acrosome reaction. As described in this report, CST12 protein is secreted by the epithelial cells in the initial segment and localized in the cytoplasmic droplets of spermatozoa. Although both CST12 and CST8 are synthesized by the epithelial cells of the proximal caput epididymis and secreted into the lumen, these male reproductive tract cystatins localized to different regions of the spermatozoa, suggesting they interact with unique, corresponding proteinases or targeting proteins and play very specialized roles in sperm maturation, sperm protection, and/or fertilization.
Normal epididymal function depends on both circulating androgens and testicular factors [4447]. Our study showed that castration for 4 and 7 days decreased Cst12 mRNA levels and that exogenous T administration further repressed Cst12 expression. Moreover, T treatment of castrated animals reduced the Cst12 mRNA (24% of sham level at Day 7 postcastration) to a similar level to that of efferent ductile ligated mice (22% of near-sham level at Day 7 postligation). These results suggest that circulating androgens do downregulate the expression of Cst12, but this downregulation may be the result of clearing of remaining testicular factors from initial segment of caput epididymis induced by androgen-dependent epididymal contractions [48].
Estrogen is one of the testicular factors that is present at high concentration in rete testis fluid [41, 49]. It has been established that estrogen receptors are present in the caput epididymis of mice [50], and estrogen plays an important role in the regulation of epididymal function [51, 52]. Our results showed that Cst12 transcript levels were restored by E administration and that E + T treatment failed to restore Cst12 mRNA. This suggests that E up-regulates the expression of Cst12 whereas T represses the expression. However, Hsia et al. did not notice restoration of Cst12 mRNA by E in castrated animals and the loss of estrogen receptor alpha (ER
) gene did not affect Cst12 mRNA levels [11]. This contrasting result is probably attributable to the following: 1) Three milligrams of E was administered in our study, resulting in at least a 10-fold increase of circulating E level, whereas only 300 ng (10,000 times less) of E was used in Hsia's report, and no E level was indicated. The high dose of exogenous E may be necessary to increase the E level in testicular or epididymal fluid. 2) Disruption of ER
(ERKO) in the male alters both morphology and physiology of the male reproductive tract, especially that of testis and efferent ductile [53, 54]. This alteration affects the components and concentration of circulating hormones and testicular factors, which may influence Cst12 mRNA levels in epididymis. In addition, ER
is present in the caput epididymis of mice. In the ERKO mouse, the epididymal epithelial cells may not respond as normal cells. Because we only examined the Cst12 gene expression in epididymis after 1 and 2 wk postcastration and hormone treatment, the upregulation by E treatment may not be due to direct involvement of E in regulation of this gene. Other testicular factors may also participate in this gene regulation in epididymis. Further experiments should be done to interpret the mechanisms involved in the modulation of Cst12 by testosterone and estrogen. Our previous study demonstrated that Cst E2 mRNA is estrogen-responsive in epididymis, whereas Cst11 is more dependent on other testicular factors [12]. These observations indicate that although these three male reproductive tract cystatins share similar localization in the epididymis, the differences in their regulation by hormones and testicular factors suggest they may play unique and specialized roles.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Correspondence: Michael D. Griswold, 531 Fulmer Hall, School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. FAX: 509 335 9688; griswold{at}mail.wsu.edu ![]()
Received: 21 January 2005.
First decision: 9 February 2005.
Accepted: 22 June 2005.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |