Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 1, 2006.
Biol Reprod 2006, 10.1095/biolreprod.105.046557
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
74/6/1007    most recent
biolreprod.105.046557v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashworth, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Geisert, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashworth, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Geisert, R. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ashworth, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Geisert, R. D.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 74, 1007–1015 (2006)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.046557
© 2006 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Research Article

Expression of Porcine Endometrial Prostaglandin Synthase During the Estrous Cycle and Early Pregnancy, and Following Endocrine Disruption of Pregnancy1

Morgan D. Ashworth 3, Jason W. Ross 3, Jianbo Hu 4, Frankie J. White 5, Daniel R. Stein 3, Udaya DeSilva 3, Gregory A. Johnson 5, Thomas E. Spencer 5, and Rodney D. Geisert 2 3

Department of Animal Science,3 Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078 Department of Animal Science,4 College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences,5 College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843

ABSTRACT

Porcine trophoblast attachment to the uterine surface is associated with increased conceptus and endometrial production of prostaglandins. Conceptus secretion of estrogen on Day 12 of gestation is important for establishment of pregnancy; however, early (Days 9 and 10) exposure to exogenous estrogens results in embryonic mortality. Present studies established the temporal and spatial pattern of endometrial PTGS1 (prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 1) and PTGS2 expression during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy and determined the effect of early estrogen treatment on endometrial PTGS expression in pregnant gilts. Endometrial PTGS1 mRNA expression increased 2- to 3-fold after Day 10 of the estrous cycle and pregnancy, whereas PTGS2 mRNA expression increased 76-fold between Days 5 and 15 of the estrous cycle and pregnancy. Increased expression of the PTGS2 transcript was detected in the lumenal epithelium after Day 10 in both cyclic and pregnant gilts. There was a 10- and 20-fold increase in endometrial PTGS2 protein expression between Days 5 and 18 of the estrous cycle and pregnancy respectively. Administration of estrogen on Days 9 and 10 of gestation increased endometrial PTGS2 mRNA and protein on Day 10, but decreased PTGS2 mRNA and protein in lumenal epithelium (LE) on Day 12 of gestation compared to vehicle-treated gilts. The present study demonstrates that an increase in uterine epithelial PTGS2 expression occurs after Day 10 of the estrous cycle and early pregnancy in the pig. The conceptus-independent increase in the uterine LE indicates that a novel pathway exists for endometrial induction PTGS2 expression before conceptus elongation and attachment to the uterine surface. Epithelial expression of PTGS2 may serve as one of the signals for placental attachment and embryo survival in the pig. Early administration of estrogen on Days 9 and 10 of pregnancy alters endometrial PTGS2 mRNA and protein expression, which may, at least in part, represent a mechanism by which endocrine disruption of pregnancy causes total embryonic loss during implantation in the pig.

female reproductive tract, implantation, pregnancy, uterus

INTRODUCTION

The noninvasive attachment of the porcine conceptus forms an epitheliochorial type of placentation through its adhesion to the extracellular glycocalyx present on apical microvilli of the uterine lumenal epithelium (LE) [1]. Estrogen coordinates a complex program of events activating implantation within the progesterone-stimulated uterine environment of mice and rats [2, 3]. Developing pig conceptuses undergo rapid trophoblast elongation and secrete estrogen on Days 11 to 12 of pregnancy [4]. Release of estrogen by the elongating conceptuses serves as the signal from the conceptus for maternal recognition of pregnancy in the pig [5, 6]. The transient acute increase in estrogen release during rapid trophoblast elongation closely follows conceptus release of the proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin 1 beta (IL1B), which has been proposed to serve as the initial stimulus for conceptus elongation and attachment to the surface of uterine LE in the pig [7].

Implantation in the estrogen primed uteri of mice and rats requires endometrial prostaglandin (PG) synthesis [3]. The importance of endometrial PTGS (prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase, also known as prostaglandin G/H synthase and cyclooxygenase) mRNA expression during implantation and decidualization was established using Ptgs2-null mice, which have an altered inflammatory response that results in reproductive defects in ovulation, fertilization, and implantation [8, 9]. Similar reproductive defects are not observed in Ptgs1-deficient mice, which are fertile and exhibit defects only with parturition [10]. During apposition of the mouse blastocyst to the uterine LE on Day 4.5 of pregnancy, ovarian estrogen increases synthesis of PGE 2 at the site of implantation [11], which is essential for implantation to occur. A dramatic increase of endometrial IL1B mRNA expression correlates with the rise in PGE 2, and an increase in endometrial IL1B secretion may stimulate PGE 2 production by elevating PTGS2 expression in the uterine epithelium [12, 13].

The increase in porcine conceptus IL1B expression occurs concomitantly with the morphological transformation of the conceptuses during trophoblast elongation [7]. Pig conceptuses and endometrium actively secrete PGs [14, 15], and conceptus expression of the PTGS2 gene increases immediately following trophoblast elongation and continues during conceptus attachment to the LE [16]. Pharmacological inhibition of PG synthesis does not affect trophoblast elongation in pigs [17]. However, inhibition of PG synthesis during the period of trophoblast attachment (Days 13 to 18) results in embryonic mortality [18]. These studies suggest that the acute release of conceptus IL1B during trophoblast elongation may have an obligatory role of enhancing PTGS2 synthesis for endometrial release of prostaglandins during the establishment of pregnancy in the pig. Although endometrial synthesis of prostaglandins has been well established, the patterns of PTGS1 and PTGS2 expression during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy have not been reported.

Although conceptus secretion of estrogen into the uterine lumen serves as one of the factors involved with establishment of pregnancy in the pig, the uterine endometrium is sensitive to the timing of estrogen exposure. Exposure of pregnant gilts to exogenous estrogens 48 h before the normal secretion by conceptuses on Day 12 results in total embryonic mortality before Day 30 of gestation [19]. Our laboratory previously demonstrated that conceptuses degenerate between Days 15 to 18 of gestation following administration of estrogen on Days 9 and 10 of pregnancy [20, 21]. Although conceptus degeneration is correlated with the spatiotemporal loss of the microvilli glycocalyx on the endometrial LE [22], changes in uterine gene expression that may adversely affect conceptus survival are unknown. We hypothesize that conceptus IL1B secretion stimulates induction of endometrial PTGS2, which may function in attachment of the conceptus to the uterine surface, and that the early administration of estrogen to pregnant gilts disrupts induction of uterine PTGS2 by conceptus IL1B, resulting in defective conceptus development and/or endometrial receptivity for placental attachment to the luminal surface.

Because endometrial PTGS1 and PTGS2 gene and protein expression have not been previously established during the porcine estrous cycle and early pregnancy, our first objective profiles endometrial expression of PTGS1 and PTGS2 during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy. The second objective evaluates endometrial PTGS1 and PTGS2 expression following treatment of gilts with estrogen on Days 9 and 10 of gestation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Research was conducted in accordance with the Guiding Principles for Care and Use of Animals promoted by the Society for the Study of Reproduction and approved by the Oklahoma State Institutional Care and Use Committee. Crossbred cycling gilts of similar age (8–10 mo) and weight (100–130 kg) were checked daily for estrous behavior with intact males. Gilts assigned to be bred were naturally mated with fertile crossbred boars at first detection of estrus, and subsequently at 12 and 24 h after detection of estrus.

Experiment I: Endometrial PTGS1 and PTGS2 Expression in Cyclic and Pregnant Gilts

Gilts were hysterectomized (n = 4 gilts/day) through midventral laparotomy on either Day 0, 5, 10, 12, 15, or 18 of the estrous cycle or Day 10, 12, 15, or 18 of pregnancy as previously described by Gries et al. [21]. Following induction of anesthesia with 1.8 ml i.m. administration of a cocktail consisting of 2.5 ml xylazine (100 mg/ml; Miles Inc.) and 2.5 ml Vetamine (ketamine HCl, 100 mg/ml; Molli Krodt Veterinary) in 500 mg of Telazol (tiletamine HCl and zolazepum HCl; Fort Dodge), anesthesia was maintained with a closed-circuit system of halothane (5%) and oxygen (1.0 L/min). The uterus was exposed via midventral laparotomy and the uterus and ovaries excised. Each uterine horn was injected with 20 ml PBS (pH 7.4) via the isthmus, and flushings were recovered in a petri dish. Conceptuses were removed from flushings of pregnant gilts, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C. Uterine flushings were cleared of cellular debris by centrifugation (1000 x g, 10 min, 4°C), supernatant collected, and uterine flushings stored at –20°C. Endometrial tissue was removed from the antimesometrial side of the middle portion of each uterine horn, immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C until used for extraction of protein and RNA.

Experiment II: Endometrial PTGS1 and PTGS2 Gene and Protein Expression Following Early Exposure of Pregnant Gilts to Estrogen

Bred gilts were randomly assigned to one of the following treatment groups: 1) vehicle: i.m. injection of corn oil (2.5 ml) on Days 9 and 10 of gestation; or 2) estrogen: 5 mg i.m. injection of estradiol cypionate (A.J. Legere) on Days 9 and 10 of gestation. Gilts were hysterectomized (n = 4 gilts/day) on Day 10, 12, 13, 15, or 17 of gestation as described in Experiment 1. Uterine horns were flushed with 20 ml PBS; conceptuses were removed, flushings were centrifuged to remove cellular debris, and supernatant was stored at –20°C. Endometrial tissue was harvested from the uterine horn and either fixed for in situ hybridization or snap-frozen as previously described in Experiment 1.

Uterine Tissue Fixation Procedures

Endometrial tissue sections (~1.0 cm) were excised from the bottom 40 cm of the uterine horn, which was not flushed with PBS. Tissue sections were placed in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.2) and gently agitated at room temperature for 24 h. Solution was replaced with 70% EtOH (v/v in H2O) and gently agitated for an additional 24 h. Fixed endometrial tissue was dehydrated in a series of graded ethanol changes followed by xylene, and was then embedded in Paraplast-Plus (Oxford Labware).

RNA Extraction

Total RNA was extracted from endometrial tissue using RNAwiz reagent (Ambion, Inc.). Approximately 0.5 g of endometrial tissue was homogenized in 5.0 ml of RNAwiz using a Virtishear homogenizer (Virtis Company Inc.). Total RNA was resuspended in 500 µl of diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water and further purified by phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol extraction followed by ethanol precipitation. Samples were treated with DNase I (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer protocol to eliminate possible DNA contamination. RNA was stored at –80°C. Total RNA was quantified with a spectrophotometer at an absorbance of 260 nm, and purity was verified using the 260/280 ratio.

Quantitative One-Step RT-PCR

Quantitative analysis of endometrial PTGS1 and PTGS2 mRNA was performed using quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) as previously described in our laboratory [23]. The PCR amplification was performed in a reaction volume of 15 µl using an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System (PE Applied Biosystems). The transcripts were evaluated using dual labeled probes with 6-Fam (5' reporter dye), and TAMRA (3' quenching dye). Primer and probe sequences for the amplification of PTGS1 and PTGS2 gene expression (Table 1) were generated from porcine sequences available in the NCBI database. Total RNA (100 ng) was assayed in duplicate using thermocycling conditions for one-step cDNA synthesis for 30 min at 50°C and for 15 min at 95°C, followed by 45 repetitive cycles for 15 sec at 95°C and for 1 min at 60°C. To determine possible genomic contamination, samples were assayed in the absence of reverse transcriptase. Samples either did not amplify or the amplification curve was greater than 8 cycles beyond the target amplification for mRNA expression. Ribosomal 18S RNA was assayed in each sample to normalize RNA loading, as previously described by our laboratory [7].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. PCR Primer and probe sequences used for quantitative RT-PCR of endometrial PTGS1 and PTGS2 mRNA expression.

Template amplification was quantified by determining the threshold cycle (CT) based on the fluorescence detected within the geometric region of the semilog plot. Theoretically, in the geometric region one cycle is equivalent to the doubling of the PCR target template. Sample dilutions were made for each assay to determine the actual PCR efficiency, which was 1.91 and 1.82 for PTGS1 and PTGS2, respectively. Using the comparative CT method [23], relative quantification of mRNA abundance was determined for the endometrial samples. Sample expressions of PTGS1 and PTGS2 mRNA were normalized with ribosomal 18S expression to adjust for sample loading. Relative units of target mRNA expression were calculated by arbitrarily setting the lowest sample measurement (CT) as one relative unit, which was used as the baseline standard to compare mRNA abundance for all other samples. Relative mRNA abundance was calculated using the PCR efficiencies for PTGS1 and PTGS2 in the formula 1.91–CT and 1.82–CT.

Western Blot Analysis of PTGS1 and PTGS2

Cytoplasmic protein was extracted from endometrial tissue using T-PER reagent (Pierce Inc.) to which a protease inhibitor cocktail, HALT (Pierce Inc.), was added. A total of 250 mg of endometrial tissue was homogenized in 5 ml T-PER reagent on ice using a Virtishear homogenizer (Virtis Company Inc.). Following homogenization, samples were centrifuged at 10 000 x g for 5 min, and supernatant was collected and stored at –20°C until it was used for Western blot analysis. Cytoplasmic protein concentration in the supernatant was determined with the Bio-Rad Protein Assay Kit II (Bio-Rad). Samples (30 µg protein) were placed in a 95°C water bath for 90 sec in equal volumes of sample denature buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 205 mg glycerol, 4% SDS, 10% ß-mercaptoethanol, and 0.0025% bromophenol blue) and protein separated in a 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore Corp.) using a semidry immunoblot apparatus (MilliBlot-SDS System) at 350 V for 3 h. Membranes were washed with Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 10 mM Tris and 150 mM NaCl) containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TTBS) and then blocked with 5% nonfat dried milk for 1 h. After being washed 3 times with TTBS for 10 min, the membrane was incubated for 2 h with rabbit anti-human PTGS2 polyclonal antibody (1:2000), or sheep anti-human PTGS1 polyclonal antibody (1:2000) (Calbio-Chem Inc.). Following incubation with primary antibody, membranes were washed 3 times with TTBS for 10 min each, and the membrane was incubated with goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (PTGS2; 1:1000), or mouse anti-sheep secondary antibody (PTGS1; 1:1000) (Bio-Rad) for 1 h. Membranes were washed with TTBS 3 times for 10 min, followed by addition of color development solution (Immuno-Blot kit; Bio-Rad). Densities of the resultant stained bands were measured with a Densitometer 2100 (Bio-Rad).

In Situ Hybridization

Expression of PTGS2 mRNA was localized in paraffin-embedded porcine uterine tissue by in situ hybridization using methods previously described by Johnson et al. [24]. Briefly, deparaffinized, rehydrated, and deproteinated uterine cross sections (5 µm) were hybridized with radiolabeled antisense or sense porcine PTGS2 cRNA probes synthesized by in vitro transcription with [{alpha}-35S] uridine 5-triphosphate (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). After hybridization, washes, and RNase A digestion, autoradiography was performed using NTB-2 liquid photographic emulsion (Eastman Kodak). Slides were exposed at 4°C for 6 days, developed in Kodak D-19 developer, counterstained with Harris modified hematoxylin (Fisher Scientific), dehydrated, and protected with coverslips.

Enzyme-Linked Competitive Binding Assays

The IL1B protein content in uterine luminal flushings collected in Experiment 2 was quantified using a commercial ELISA (R&D Systems) as previously described in our laboratory [7]. All samples, standards, and controls were assayed in duplicate. The intra-assay coefficient of variation of the IL1B ELISA was 4.9%. Total contents of PGE 2 and PGF2{alpha} in the uterine flushings collected in Experiment 2 were quantified using a commercial ELISA (R&D Systems) validated for uterine flushing in our laboratory in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Samples were analyzed in duplicate with a single assay. The intra-assay coefficients of variation for the PGE 2 and PGF2{alpha} assays were 5.1% and 4.9%, respectively.

Microscopy and Digital Imaging

Photomicrographs of representative brightfield and darkfield images of in situ hybridization were evaluated with a Zeiss Axioplan2 microscope (Carl Zeiss) interfaced with an Axioplan HR digital camera and Axiovision 3.0 software. Digital images were captured and photographic plates assembled using Adobe Photoshop 6.0 (Adobe Systems Inc.)

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed by least-squares ANOVA using the Proc Mixed model of the Statistical Analysis System [25]. The statistical model used to analyze cyclic and pregnant endometrial PTGS1 and PTGS2 gene and protein expression in Experiment 1 included the effects of day, reproductive status (cyclic or pregnant), and day x reproductive status interaction. The statistical model used to analyze endometrial PTGS1 and PTGS2 gene expression and uterine flushing PG content in Experiment 2 included the effects of day, treatment, and day x treatment interaction. Because of unequal variances of PGE 2 and PGF2{alpha} content in the uterine flushings, data were transformed using log and square root transformations for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Experiment I

Endometrial PTGS1 and PTGS2 mRNA expression. Endometrial PTGS1 mRNA expression (Fig. 1A) was affected by day (P < 0.001), but not pregnancy status. Endometrial expression of PTGS1 increased approximately 3-fold after Day 10 of the estrous cycle and pregnancy. PTGS1 mRNA expression remained elevated to Day 18 of the estrous cycle and pregnancy.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Relative units (mean ± SEM) of mRNA expression for endometrial PTGS1 (A) and PTGS2 (B) during the porcine estrous cycle (gray bar) and early pregnancy (black bar). Abundance of mRNA was calculated from the real-time PCR analysis as described in Materials and Methods. Bars with different letters represent a statistical difference between days (P < 0.001).

Endometrial PTGS2 mRNA expression (Fig. 1B) was affected by day (P < 0.0001), but not pregnancy status. Endometrial PTGS2 mRNA expression was lowest on Day 5 of the estrous cycle. Expression of PTGS2 mRNA increased approximately 76-fold on Day 12 of the estrous cycle and pregnancy. Endometrial PTGS2 expression remained elevated on Day 18 in both cyclic and pregnancy gilts.

In situ hybridization analysis. In situ hybridization revealed that uterine LE and glandular epithelium of the endometrium were devoid of PTGS2 mRNA on Days 5 to 10 of the estrous cycle (Fig. 2). However, PTGS2 mRNA expression within LE of the endometrium was abundant by Day 15 of the estrous cycle. In pregnant gilts (Fig. 2), endometrial PTGS2 mRNA cellular localization was localized in the LE beginning on Day 12 of gestation. Expression of PTGS2 mRNA remained abundant in the LE on Day 15 of gestation.


Figure 2
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. In situ hybridization analysis of PTGS2 mRNA expression in porcine endometrium during the estrous cycle (C) and pregnancy (P). Protected transcripts in endometrium from Days 5, 10, 12, and 15 of the estrous cycle and Days 10, 12, and 15 of pregnancy were visualized by liquid emulsion autoradiography for 1 wk and imaged under brightfield and darkfield illumination. Note the lack of PTGS2 transcription in endometrium on Days 5 and 10 followed by an increase in PTGS2 transcription in the lumenal epithelium in Day 15 of the estrous cycle. During pregnancy, PTGS2 increased in the lumenal epithelium on Days 12 and 15. A representative section of Day 12 of pregnancy hybridized with radiolabeled sense cRNA probe (Sense) serves as a negative control. LE, Lumenal epithelium; GE, glandular epithelium; ST, stroma. Original magnification x260.

Western blot analysis. Western blot analysis of the PTGS1 detected a single 72-kDa protein that remained relatively constant through Day 10 of the estrous cycle and pregnancy (Fig. 3A). On Day 12 of the estrous cycle and pregnancy, there was an increase in intensity of the 72-kDa band for PTGS1 that continued through Day 18.


Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Detection of PTGS1 (A) and PTGS2 (B) protein in porcine endometrial extracts using Western blotting. Western blots are representative of protein extracts from cyclic (Days 0, 5, 10, 12, 15 and 18) and pregnant (Days 10, 12, 15, and 18) endometrium. The sheep antihuman PTGS1 polyclonal antibody reacted with a 72-kDa product of PTGS1 (A) and the rabbit antihuman PTGS2 polyclonal antibody detected the 72-kDa form of PTGS2 (B) in the cytoplasmic extract (see Materials and Methods). Densitometric scanning (mean ± SEM) of the PTGS2 72-kDa product on blots from 4 different gilts per day of the cycle or pregnancy (C) indicated that PTGS2 expression in cyclic (gray bar) and pregnant (black bar) endometrium was affected by day (P < 0.04) and status (P < 0.03).

Western blot analysis of endometrial protein detected a single 72-kDa immunoreactive product to the PTGS2 antiserum across all days of the estrous cycle and early pregnancy (Fig. 3B). Endometrial expression of the 72-kDa product (Fig. 3C) was affected by day (P < 0.04) and status (P < 0.03). PTGS2 expression was apparent on Day 0 but decreased on Day 5 of the estrous cycle, with levels of PTGS2 protein increasing 20-fold from Days 5 to 15 of the estrous cycle (Fig. 3C). PTGS2 protein increased 10-fold between Days 10 and 15 of pregnancy. Overall endometrial content of PTGS2 between Days 10 and 18 was approximately 3-fold greater in cyclic compared to pregnant gilts.

Experiment 2

Conceptus development, viability, and IL1B secretion. Normal spherical conceptuses were recovered from the flushing media of vehicle- and estrogen-treated gilts on Day 10 of pregnancy. On Day 12 of pregnancy, a few pregnancies contained spherical conceptuses, but filamentous conceptuses were recovered in the majority of the gilts. Viable peri-attachment conceptuses were recovered in both vehicle- and estrogen-treated gilts on Day 13 of pregnancy, but conceptuses were fragmented and degenerating in estrogen-treated gilts harvested on Days 15 and 17 of pregnancy. Content of IL1B in uterine flushings was not different (P < 0.46) between vehicle- and estrogen-treated gilts. A day effect (P < 0.01) was detected for the uterine lumenal content of IL1B, which increased with conceptus elongation on Days 12 and 13 of pregnancy (Fig. 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. IL-1B protein content (mean ± SEM) detected in uterine flushings from gilts treated with vehicle or estrogen on Days 9 and 10 of gestation. Bars with different letters represent a statistical difference between days (P < 0.01).

Endometrial PTGS1 and PTGS2 mRNA expression. Endometrial PTGS1 mRNA expression was affected by day (P < 0.01), but not estrogen treatment (P > 0.10). Expression of PTGS1 mRNA increased 2-fold in the endometrium between Days 10 and 15 of gestation (Fig. 5A).


Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Relative units (mean ± SEM) of mRNA expression for endometrial PTGS1 (A) and PTGS2 (B) from vehicle- (gray bar) and estrogen-treated (black bar) pregnant gilts. Abundance of mRNA was calculated from real-time PCR analysis as described in Materials and Methods. Days with different superscripts for PTGS1 mRNA abundance are statistically different (P < 0.001). Values for abundance of endometrial PTGS2 mRNA with different letters differ (P < 0.05).

A day x treatment interaction (P < 0.01) was detected for endometrial PTGS2 mRNA expression (Fig. 5B). In vehicle-treated gilts, mRNA expression increased 5-fold from Day 10 to Day 12 of pregnancy and remained elevated to Day 18. However, estrogen treatment altered the normal expression pattern compared to that seen in vehicle-treated gilts. Endometrial PTGS2 mRNA expression in estrogen-treated gilts was 2.9-fold greater on Day 10 of pregnancy compared to vehicle-treated gilts. However, PTGS2 mRNA expression was 5.1-fold greater in vehicle- compared to estrogen-treated gilts on Day 12 of pregnancy. Endometrial expression of PTGS2 decreased from Day 10 to Day 12 in estrogen-treated gilts. Endometrial PTGS2 mRNA expression was similar between treatment groups on Days 13, 15, and 17 of gestation.

In situ hybridization analysis Endometrial PTGS2 gene expression was localized in the LE on Day 12 of gestation in vehicle-treated gilts (Fig. 6) as previously described in Experiment 1. Expression of PTGS2 remained in the LE from Day 12 to Day 17 of gestation. Treatment of gilts with estrogen on Days 9 and 10 altered the temporal pattern of PTGS2 expression within the endometrium. Expression of PTGS2 in the LE of estrogen-treated gilts was greatly attenuated on Days 12 and 13 of gestation compared to vehicle-treated gilts.


Figure 6
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. In situ hybridization analysis of PTGS2 mRNA expression in porcine endometrium from gilts treated with either vehicle or estrogen on Days 9 and 10 of gestation. Protected transcripts in endometrium from Days 10, 12, 13, 15, and 17 of gestation were visualized by liquid emulsion autoradiography for 1 wk and imaged under brightfield and darkfield illumination. A representative section from Day 17 of a vehicle-treated gilt hybridized with radiolabeled sense cRNA probe (Sense) serves as a negative control. Note the low PTGS2 transcription in endometrial lumenal epithelium of estrogen-treated gilts on Days 12 and 17 of gestation compared to vehicle-treated gilts. LE, Lumenal epithelium; GE, glandular epithelium; ST, stroma. Original magnification x260.

Western blot analysis: PTGS1 and PTGS2. Western blot analysis did not detect any differences in endometrial PTGS1 protein expression between estrogen-and vehicle-treated gilts (Fig. 7). The expression pattern of endometrial PTGS2 protein was different between vehicle- and estrogen-treated gilts (Fig. 8A). A day x treatment effect (P < 0.001) was detected for endometrial PTGS2 protein expression (Fig. 8B). In vehicle-treated gilts, PTGS2 protein expression was faint on Day 10 and increased 5-fold on Day 12. Day 13 endometrial content of PTGS2 was low, but PTGS2 was abundant on Days 15 and 17 of pregnancy. Estrogen-treated gilts showed a shift in PTGS2 expression: PTGS2 was abundant on Day 10, but this was followed by a dramatic decline of PTGS2 expression on Day 12 (Fig. 8B). Endometrial content of PTGS2 protein increased from Day 13 to Day 17 in the estrogen-treated gilts.


Figure 7
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Western blot detection of PTGS1 protein in porcine endometrial extracts of vehicle- and estrogen-treated gilts using the sheep antihuman PTGS1 polyclonal antibody. Each lane represents endometrial cytoplasmic extract from an individual animal collected on Days 10, 12, 13, and 15 of pregnancy (Day 17 data not shown).


Figure 8
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Western blot detection of 72-kDa PTGS2 protein in porcine endometrial extracts of vehicle- and estrogen-treated gilts (A) using the rabbit antihuman PTGS2 polyclonal antibody. Each lane represents endometrial cytoplasmic extract from an individual animal collected on Days 10, 12, 13, and 15 of pregnancy (Day 17 data not shown). Note that estrogen treatment on Days 9 and 10 of gestation induced an early appearance of the 72-kDa PTGS2 protein on Day 10 of gestation, but detection of PTGS2 was low in comparison to vehicle-treated gilts on Day 12. Densitometric scanning (mean ± SEM) of the PTGS2 72-kDa product on blots from four different gilts per treatment per day (B) indicated that endometrial PTGS2 expression in vehicle- (gray bar) and estrogen- (black bar) treated gilts was affected by day x treatment (P < 0.001).

ELISA assay of prostaglandins in uterine flushings. Estrogen treatment did not alter the total uterine content of PGE 2 or PGF2{alpha} in uterine flushings of pregnant gilts. Total lumenal content of PGF2{alpha} increased across the days of pregnancy (P < 0.001). Uterine lumenal content of PGF2{alpha} was 4.1, 0.11, 0.69, 8.43 and 9.18 ng on Days 10, 12, 13, 15, and 17 of gestation, respectively. Content of PGF2{alpha} in the uterine flushings increased 80-fold from Day 12 to Day 17 of gestation. Content of PGE 2 in the uterine flushings also increased across the days of gestation (P < 0.001). Uterine lumenal content of PGE 2 was 1.0, 52.5, 223.7, 1008.5 and 1348.7 ng on Days 10, 12, 13, 15, and 17 of gestation, respectively. Following conceptus elongation on Day 12, there was a 20-fold increase of PGE 2 in the uterine flushings on Day 15. Uterine content of PGE 2 continued to increase during the period of placental attachment to the uterine surface.

DISCUSSION

Endometrial synthesis of prostaglandins is essential for establishment of pregnancy in species with both invasive [9, 13, 26] and noninvasive forms of implantation [18]. Implantation in the pig occurs through noninvasive attachment between the trophoblast and uterine surface epithelial microvilli [27]. Endometrial expression of PTGS1 increased only slightly during late diestrus and early pregnancy in the pig; however, significant changes in endometrial PTGS2 expression were observed over the same period. Prostaglandins are involved with many changes in tissue vascularity and proinflammatory responses [28]. The large increase in endometrial PTGS2 expression after Day 10 of pregnancy coincides with the time of rapid conceptus development, conceptus secretion of estrogen and IL1B, and trophoblast attachment to the endometrial LE in the pig [4]. A number of growth factors and cytokines stimulate prostaglandin synthesis through induction PTGS2 mRNA expression [28, 29]. IL1B induces PTGS2 expression through activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-{kappa}B) [30]. Expression of IL1B increases before initiation of blastocyst implantation in the mouse [3133], and it may be an initiator of conceptus-uterine interaction during pregnancy in women [34]. Expressions of IL1 receptor types I and II (IL1R1 and IL1R2) in the endometrium are both molecular markers for uterine receptivity in mice [35]. During rapid trophoblastic elongation on Day 12 of pregnancy, pig conceptuses secrete large amounts of IL1B, and there is an increase in endometrial IL1R1 mRNA expression [7].

Our working hypothesis was that conceptus expression of IL1B triggers transcription of inflammatory cytokines and factors involved with endometrial receptivity to implantation in the pig. The increase in endometrial PTGS2 mRNA and protein expression on Day 12 of pregnancy correlates with peak conceptus secretion of IL1B during trophoblast elongation [7]. However, this increase is not pregnancy-specific; a similar increase in endometrial PTGS2 mRNA and protein expression also occurs in cyclic gilts. Therefore, the increase in endometrial PTGS2 mRNA expression is not the direct result of conceptus IL1B secretion, but is rather part of a complex and sequential uterine program to accomplish placental attachment in the pig. The significant increase in endometrial PTGS2 mRNA occurs in the endometrial LE from Day 10 to Day 18 of the estrous cycle and early pregnancy, where it is optimally placed to possibly mediate placentation in pigs [18]. Thus, our research has established that PTGS2 increases in the endometrial LE during the period of porcine conceptus attachment to the uterine surface, which is independent of conceptus IL1B secretion. Results indicate a uterine mechanism exists for inducing PTGS2 mRNA expression specifically in endometrial LE during the estrous cycle.

Increased expression of PTGS2 in the uterine LE is temporally associated with the loss of the progesterone receptor (PGR) from the uterine LE [36]. It is possible that PTGS2 expression in LE may be induced through activation of the NF-{kappa}B pathway (see [37]), which has been detected in the human endometrium [38]. Inhibition of NF-{kappa}B activation blocks induction of PTGS2 mRNA expression in trophoblast cells [39]. Further, expression of another NF-{kappa}B regulated cytokine, fibroblast growth factor 7 (keratinocyte growth factor), is increased in porcine endometrial LE following loss of epithelial PGR during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy [40]. Indeed, a mutual negative interaction between NF-{kappa}B (subunit P-65) and PGR has been suggested [41], because loss of the PGR in the endometrial epithelia is associated with increased activation of NF-{kappa}B in women [42], and NF-{kappa}B activation has been implicated in opening the window of implantation in the mouse uterus [43]. Interestingly, the NF-{kappa}B system is involved with many inflammatory events and with the release of cytokines [44], events that occur during early conceptus development and attachment to the uterine surface [4]. One uterine pathway to activate NF-{kappa}B independently of conceptus IL1B secretion may be progesterone-stimulated endometrial expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor {kappa}B ligand (RANKL). In the developing mammary gland, progesterone stimulates RANKL expression to activate NF-{kappa}B for development of the lobuloalveolar buds [45]. Gene expression of RANKL increases in the porcine endometrium on Day 10 of the estrous cycle (unpublished results), which could activate NF-{kappa}B to increase PTGS2 mRNA expression as observed in our study. We propose the hypothesis that changes in endometrial PTGS2 gene expression may be regulated through progesterone-induced RANKL expressions causing cell-specific changes in PGR and NF-{kappa}B, which could play an important role in regulating conceptus development and timing of implantation in the pig. Further studies are needed to investigate the possible interaction of RANKL, PGR, and NF-{kappa}B in the porcine uterus during the establishment of pregnancy.

Pope et al. [19] were the first to demonstrate the detrimental effects of early estrogen exposure on porcine embryo survival. Although slight reductions in the uterine surface glycocalyx occur during placentation in the pig [28], early estrogen exposure results in uterine surface microvilli devoid of glycocalyx by Day 16 of gestation [22]. Breakdown of the glycocalyx is not an immediate response, but rather occurs 5 days after early estrogen exposure. The present study provides evidence that exogenous exposure of gilts to estrogen on Days 9 and 10 of pregnancy does not affect conceptus IL1B secretion during elongation but does alter mRNA and protein expression of the inducible PTGS system on Days 12 and 13 of gestation. Inappropriate early exposure of the uterus to estrogen advances the normal induction of PTGS2 in the LE. Although uterine PG content in uterine flushing was not different between vehicle- and estrogen-treated gilts, the majority of the high lumenal content of PGs on Days 12–15 of pregnancy originates from the developing conceptuses [1, 4]. In a previous study, Morgan et al. [20] did not detect any difference in uterine lumenal PGF2{alpha} content between vehicle- and estrogen-treated gilts. It is difficult to determine endometrial production of PGs from uterine flushings, because porcine conceptuses are the major contributors of PGs in the lumen during this day of gestation [4] and cannot be separated from the smaller contribution of the endometrium. In cyclic gilts administered estrogen on Day 11, the lumenal content of PGs does not increase until Day 15 of the induced pseudopregnancy [46]. Thus, the presence of elevated endometrial PTGS2 mRNA does not necessarily correspond to changes to PGs in the uterine lumen until Day 15. The premature increase of PTGS2 on Day 10 provides evidence that the administration of estrogen on Days 9 and 10 of gestation stimulates an early increase in the uterine LE before Day 12. However, there is a dramatic decline in PTGS2 expression in the uterine LE on Day 12, when the conceptuses would undergo trophoblast elongation and initiate attachment to the LE. Alteration in PTGS2 mRNA and protein expression in the uterine LE is specific to Days 10 to 13, because there is no difference in vehicle- and estrogen-treated gilts on Days 15 and 17. Although the present study is correlative and does not provide definitive evidence that short-term alteration of endometrial PTGS2 expression causes embryonic loss during the period of placental attachment, Ptgs2-null mice have an altered inflammatory response, resulting in defects causing implantation failure [9]. Induction of PTGS2 expression promotes PGE synthesis [47], and it is known that endometrial secretion of PGE increases during peri-implantation in pigs [4], perhaps to stabilize the extracellular matrix, inflammation, and immune functions.

PTGS2 is not the only endometrial gene that is affected by endocrine disruption with early exposure of the uterus to estrogen in the pig. An alternative cause of embryonic death could be the result of changing the window of receptivity with early estrogen exposure. A recent study in our laboratory demonstrated that estrogen exposure on Days 9 and 10 of pregnancy resulted in a premature proteolysis of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins and a loss of IGF1 and IGF2 48 h before the normal decline in uterine luminal IGFs on Day 12 and 13 [48]. Thus, loss of pig conceptuses during the period of trophoblast attachment following early estrogen exposure may be caused by an advancement of uterine gene programming that disrupts the normal timing of conceptus attachment to the uterine surface resulting in later embryonic death. Microarray analysis revealed that endometrial expression for a number of genes is advanced on Day 12 of gestation by early estrogen exposure (unpublished results). Future studies on the role of NF-{kappa}B in uterine and conceptus development are needed to establish the role of estrogen and IL1B in regulating the proinflammatory response that occurs during early pregnancy in the pig.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Mr. Steve Welty for the care and feeding of the animals used in the study and the Oklahoma State University Recombinant DNA/Protein Resource Facility for the sequencing of cDNA.

FOOTNOTES

1 Supported by the National Research Initiative Competitive Grant 2002-35203-12262 from the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service and Oklahoma Agriculture Experiment Station project H-02465. Manuscript approved for publication by the Director of the Oklahoma Agriculture Experiment Station. Back

2 Correspondence: Rodney D. Geisert, Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Animal Science Building, Room 114, Stillwater, OK 74078. FAX: 405 744 7390; Rodney.Geisert{at}okstate.edu Back

Received: 15 August 2005.

First decision: 13 September 2005.

Accepted: 27 January 2006.

REFERENCES

  1. Stroband HW, Van der Lende T, Embryonic and uterine development during pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1990 40:261-277[Medline]
  2. Yoshinaga K, Adams CE, Delayed implantation in the spayed, progesterone treated adult mouse. J Reprod Fertil 1966 12:593-595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Psychoyos A, Uterine receptivity for nidation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1986 476:36-42[Medline]
  4. Geisert RD, Yelich JV, Regulation of conceptus development and attachment in pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1997 52:133-149[Medline]
  5. Keys JL, King GL, Microscopic examination of porcine conceptus-maternal interface between days 10 and 19 of pregnancy. Am J Anat 1990 188:221-238[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Jaeger LA, Johnson GA, Ka H, Garlow JG, Burghardt RC, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, Functional analysis of autocrine and paracrine signaling at the uterine-conceptus interface in pigs. Reprod Suppl 2001 58:191-207[Medline]
  7. Ross JW, Malayer JR, Ritchey JW, Geisert RD, Characterization of the interleukin-1beta system during porcine trophoblastic elongation and early placental attachment. Biol Reprod 2003 69:1251-1259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Dinchuk JE, Car BD, Focht RJ, Johnston JJ, Jaffee BD, Covington MB, Contel NR, Eng VM, Collins RJ, Czerniak PM, Gorry SA, Trzaskos JM, Renal abnormalities and an altered inflammatory response in mice lacking cyclooxygenase II. Nature 1995 378:406-409[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Lim H, Paria BC, Das SK, Dinchuk JE, Langenbach R, Trzaskos JM, Dey SK, Multiple female reproductive failures in cyclooxygenase 2-deficient mice. Cell 1997 91:197-208[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Gross GA, Imamura T, Luedke C, Vogt SK, Olson LM, Nelson DM, Sadovsky Y, Muglia LJ, Opposing actions of prostaglandins and oxytocin determine the onset of murine labor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998 95:11875-11879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Johnston ME, Kennedy TG, Estrogen and uterine sensitization for the decidual cell reaction in the rat: Role of prostaglandin E2 and adenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate. Biol Reprod 1984 31:959-966[Abstract]
  12. De M, Sanford TR, Wood GW, Expression of interleukin 1, interleukin 6 and tumour necrosis factor alpha in mouse uterus during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil 1993 97:83-89[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Chakraborty I, Das SK, Wang J, Dey SK, Developmental expression of the cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2 genes in the peri-implantation mouse uterus and their differential regulation by the blastocyst and ovarian steroids. J Mol Endocrinol 1996 16:107-122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Geisert RD, Brookbank JW, Roberts RM, Bazer FW, Establishment of pregnancy in the pig: I. Interrelationships between preimplantation development of the pig blastocyst and uterine endometrial secretions. Biol Reprod 1982 27:925-939[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Guthrie HD, Lewis GS, Production of prostaglandin F2{alpha} and estrogen by embryonal membranes and endometrium and metabolism of prostaglandin F2{alpha} by embryonal membranes, endometrium and lung from gilts. Domest Anim Endocrinol 1986 3:185-198[CrossRef]
  16. Wilson ME, Fahrenkrug SC, Smith TP, Rohrer GA, Ford SP, Differential expression of cyclooxygenase-2 around the time of elongation in the pig conceptus. Anim Reprod Sci 2002 71:229-237[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Geisert RD, Rasby RJ, Minton JE, Wettemann RP, Role of prostaglandins in development of porcine blastocysts. Prostaglandins 1986 31:191-204[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Kraeling RR, Rampacek GB, Fiorello NA, Inhibition of pregnancy with indomethacin in mature gilts and prepubertal gilts induced to ovulate. Biol Reprod 1985 32:105-110[Abstract]
  19. Pope WF, Lawyer MS, Butler WR, Foote RH, First NL, Response shift in the ability of gilts to remain pregnant following exogenous estradiol-17 beta exposure. J Anim Sci 1986 63:1208-1210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Morgan GL, Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Fazleabas AT, Development and survival of pig blastocysts after oestrogen administration on day 9 or days 9 and 10 of pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil 1987 80:133-141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Gries LK, Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Garret JE, Morgan GL, Uterine secretory alterations coincident to embryonic mortality in the gilt after exogenous estrogen administration. J Anim Sci 1989 67:276-284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Blair RM, Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Yellin T, Fulton RW, Short EC, Endometrial surface and secretory alterations associated with embryonic mortality in gilts administered estradiol valerate on days 9 and 10 of gestation. Biol Reprod 1991 44:1063-1079[Abstract]
  23. Hettinger AM, Allen MR, Zhang BR, Goad DW, Malayer JR, Geisert RD, Presence of the acute phase protein, bikunin, in the endometrium of gilts during estrous cycle and early pregnancy. Biol Reprod 2001 65:507-513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW, Ovine osteopontin: I. Cloning and expression of messenger ribonucleic acid in the uterus during the periimplantation period. Biol Reprod 1999 61:884-891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. SAS. SAS User's Guide: Statistics (version 5.0) Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc 1985
  26. Lau IF, Saksena SK, Chang MC, Pregnancy blockade by indomethacin, an inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis: its reversal by prostaglandins and progesterone in mice. Prostaglandins 1973 4:795-803[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Dantzer V, Electron microscopy of the initial stages of placentation in the pig. Anat Embryol 1985 172:281-293[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Smith WL, DeWitt DL, Garavito RM, Cyclooxygenases: structural, cellular, and molecular biology. Annu Rev Biochem 2000 69:145-182[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Bailey JM, Muza B, Hla T, Pash J, Role of epidermal growth factor in cyclooxygenase synthesis. Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane Leukot Res 1985 15:141-152[Medline]
  30. Soloff MS, Cook DL, Jr, Jeng Y-J, Anderson GD, In situ analysis of interleukin-1-induced transcription of cox-2 and il-8 in cultured human myometrial cells. Endocrinology 2004 145:1248-1254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Huang HY, Krussel JS, Wen Y, Polan ML, Use of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to detect embryonic interleukin-1 system messenger RNA in individual preimplantation mouse embryos co-cultured with Vero cells. Hum Reprod 1997 12:1537-1544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kruessel JS, Huang HY, Wen Y, Kloodt AR, Bielfeld P, Polan ML, Different pattern of interleukin-1ß-(IL-1ß), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist-(IL-1ra) and interleukin-1 receptor type I-(IL-1R tI) mRNA-expression in single preimplantation mouse embryos at various developmental stages. J Reprod Immunol 1997 33:103-120
  33. Krussel JS, Bielfeld P, Polan ML, Simon C, Regulation of embryonic implantation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003 110:S2-S9
  34. Lindhard A, Bentin-Ley U, Ravn V, Islin H, Hviid T, Rex S, Bangsboll S, Sorensen S, Biochemical evaluation of endometrial function at the time of implantation. Fertil Steril 2002 78:221-233[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Reese J, Das SK, Paria BC, Lim H, Song H, Matsumoto H, Knudtson KL, DuBois RN, Dey SK, Global gene expression analysis to identify molecular markers of uterine receptivity and embryo implantation. J Biol Chem 2001 276:44137-44145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Geisert RD, Pratt TN, Bazer FW, Mayes JS, Watson GH, Immunocytochemical localization and changes in endometrial progestin receptor protein during the porcine oestrous cycle and early pregnancy. Reprod Fertil Dev 1994 6:749-760[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Geisert RD, Ross JW, Ashworth White FJ, Johnson GA, DeSilva U, Maternal recognition of pregnancy signal or endocrine disruptor: the two faces of oestrogen during establishment of pregnancy in the pig. Reprod Suppl 2006 62:131-145
  38. Page M, Tuckerman EM, Li TC, Laird SM, Expression of nuclear factor kappa B components in human endometrium. J Reprod Immunol 2002 54:1-13[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Kniss DA, Rovin B, Fertel RH, Zimmerman PD, Blockade NF-{kappa}B activation prohibits TNF-{alpha}-induce cyclooygenase-2 gene expression in ED27 trophoblast-like cells. Placenta 2001 22:80-89[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Ka H, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Keratinocyte growth factor: Expression by endometrial epithelia of the porcine uterus. Biol Reprod 2000 62:1772-78[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Kalkhoven E, Wissink S, van der Saag PT, van der Burg B, Negative interaction between the RelA(p65) subunit of NF-{kappa}B and the progesterone receptor. J Biol Chem 1996 271:6217-6224[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. King AE, Critchley HOD, Kelly RW, The NF-kB pathway in human endometrium and first trimester deciduas. Mol Hum Reprod 2001 7:175-183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Nakamura H, Kimura T, Ogita K, Nakamura T, Takemura M, Shimoya K, Koyama S, Tsujie T, Koyama M, Murata Y, NF-kappaB activation at implantation window of the mouse uterus. Am J Reprod Immunol 2004 51:16-21
  44. McKay LI, Cidlowski JA, Molecular control of immune/inflammatory responses: Interactions between nuclear factor-kappa B and steroid receptor-signaling pathways. Endocr Rev 1999 20:435-459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Cao Y, Karin M, NF-{kappa}B in mammary gland development and breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2003 8:215-223[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Geisert RD, Thatcher WW, Roberts RM, Bazer FW, Establishment of pregnancy in the pig: III. Endometrial secretory response to estradiol valerate administered on day 11 of estrous cycle. Biol Reprod 1982 27:957-965[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Murakami M, Kudo I, Recent advances in molecular biology and physiology of the prostaglandin E2-biosynthetic pathway. Prog Lipid Res 2004 43:3-35[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Ashworth MD, Ross JW, Allen DT, Stein DR, Spicer LJ, DeSilva U, Geisert RD, Endocrine disruption of uterine insulin-like growth factor (IGF) expression in the pregnant gilt. Reproduction 2005 130:545-551[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
J. W. Ross, M. D. Ashworth, D. R. Stein, O. P. Couture, C. K. Tuggle, and R. D. Geisert
Identification of differential gene expression during porcine conceptus rapid trophoblastic elongation and attachment to uterine luminal epithelium
Physiol Genomics, February 2, 2009; 36(3): 140 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Seo, M. Kim, Y. Choi, C.-K. Lee, and H. Ka
Analysis of Lysophosphatidic Acid (LPA) Receptor and LPA-Induced Endometrial Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthase 2 Expression in the Porcine Uterus
Endocrinology, December 1, 2008; 149(12): 6166 - 6175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. M. Joyce, J. R. Burghardt, R. C. Burghardt, R. N. Hooper, F. W. Bazer, and G. A. Johnson
Uterine MHC Class I Molecules and {beta}2-Microglobulin Are Regulated by Progesterone and Conceptus Interferons during Pig Pregnancy
J. Immunol., August 15, 2008; 181(4): 2494 - 2505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. W. Ross, M. D. Ashworth, F. J. White, G. A. Johnson, P. J. Ayoubi, U. DeSilva, K. M. Whitworth, R. S. Prather, and R. D. Geisert
Premature Estrogen Exposure Alters Endometrial Gene Expression to Disrupt Pregnancy in the Pig
Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4761 - 4773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
A. Waclawik and A. J Ziecik
Differential expression of prostaglandin (PG) synthesis enzymes in conceptus during peri-implantation period and endometrial expression of carbonyl reductase/PG 9-ketoreductase in the pig
J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 194(3): 499 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. M. Joyce, R. C. Burghardt, R. D. Geisert, J. R. Burghardt, R. N. Hooper, J. W. Ross, M. D. Ashworth, and G. A. Johnson
Pig Conceptuses Secrete Estrogen and Interferons to Differentially Regulate Uterine STAT1 in a Temporal and Cell Type-Specific Manner
Endocrinology, September 1, 2007; 148(9): 4420 - 4431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. M. Joyce, J. R. Burghardt, R. C. Burghardt, R. N. Hooper, L. A. Jaeger, T. E. Spencer, F. W. Bazer, and G. A. Johnson
Pig Conceptuses Increase Uterine Interferon-Regulatory Factor 1 (IRF1), but Restrict Expression to Stroma Through Estrogen-Induced IRF2 in Luminal Epithelium
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 292 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Ka, S. Al-Ramadan, D. W. Erikson, G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, T. E. Spencer, L. A. Jaeger, and F. W. Bazer
Regulation of Expression of Fibroblast Growth Factor 7 in the Pig Uterus by Progesterone and Estradiol
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2007; 77(1): 172 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
74/6/1007    most recent
biolreprod.105.046557v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashworth, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Geisert, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashworth, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Geisert, R. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ashworth, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Geisert, R. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS