Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print March 22, 2006.
Biol Reprod 2006, 10.1095/biolreprod.105.043919
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
75/1/17    most recent
biolreprod.105.043919v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiendleder, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hiendleder, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hiendleder, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, E.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 75, 17–23 (2006)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.043919
© 2006 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Research Article

Tissue-Specific Effects of In Vitro Fertilization Procedures on Genomic Cytosine Methylation Levels in Overgrown and Normal Sized Bovine Fetuses1

Stefan Hiendleder 2 3, Michaela Wirtz 4, Cora Mund 5, Martina Klempt 3, Horst-Dieter Reichenbach 6, Miodrag Stojkovic 3, Myriam Weppert 3, Hendrik Wenigerkind 7, Martin Elmlinger 8, Frank Lyko 5, Oliver J. Schmitz 4, and Eckhard Wolf 37 

Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology,3 Gene Center of the Ludwig-Maximilian University, D-81377 Munich, Germany Department of Analytical Chemistry,4 University of Wuppertal, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany Division of Epigenetics,5 Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany Biotechnology Group,6 Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, D-85586 Grub, Germany Bavarian Research Center for Biology of Reproduction (BFZF),7 D-85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany Pediatric Endocrinology Section,8 University Hospital, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany

ABSTRACT

Epigenetic perturbations are assumed to be responsible for phenotypic abnormalities of fetuses and offspring originating from in vitro embryo techniques. We studied 29 viable Day-80 bovine fetuses to assess the effects of two in vitro fertilization protocols (IVF1 and IVF2) on fetal phenotype and genomic cytosine methylation levels in liver, skeletal muscle, and brain. The IVF1 protocol employed 0.01 U/ml of FSH and LH in oocyte maturation medium and 5% estrous cow serum (ECS) in embryo culture medium, whereas the IVF2 protocol employed 0.2 U/ml of FSH and no LH for oocyte maturation and 10% ECS for embryo culture. Comparisons with in vivo–fertilized controls (n = 14) indicated an apparently normal phenotype for IVF1 fetuses (n = 5), but IVF2 fetuses (n = 10) were significantly heavier (19.9%) and longer (4.7%), with increased heart (25.2%) and liver (27.9%) weights, and thus displayed an overgrowth phenotype. A clinicochemical screen of 18 plasma parameters revealed significantly increased levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (40.8%) and creatinine (37.5%) in IVF2, but not in IVF1, fetuses. Quantification of genomic 5-methylcytosine (5mC) by capillary electrophoresis indicated that both IVF1 and IVF2 fetuses differed from controls. We observed significant DNA hypomethylation in liver and muscle of IVF1 fetuses (–16.1% and –9.3%, respectively) and significant hypermethylation in liver of IVF2 fetuses (+11.2%). The 5mC level of cerebral DNA was not affected by IVF protocol. Our data indicate that bovine IVF procedures can affect fetal genomic 5mC levels in a protocol- and tissue-specific manner and show that hepatic hypermethylation is associated with fetal overgrowth and its correlated endocrine changes.

conceptus, developmental biology, embryo growth factors, in vitro fertilization

INTRODUCTION

Epigenetic modifications of the genome play a significant role in the elaboration of the genetic code and affect early growth and development through their influence on gene expression [1–3]. It is assumed that aberrant epigenotypes of embryos and fetuses cause abnormalities that are frequently observed in ruminants and mice following exposure of oocytes and embryos to chemical and physical agents or manipulations during the use of assisted reproductive technology. One observed abnormality is referred to as large offspring syndrome (LOS), which is found frequently among nuclear transfer (NT) pregnancies but also in a considerable proportion of fetuses and offspring generated by in vitro fertilization (IVF) [4–8]. In the bovine, the phenotypic spectrum of LOS includes altered placental morphology and function, fetal overgrowth, abnormal organ and skeletal development, altered muscle fiber ratio, and endocrinological as well as physiological changes [4, 5, 7–12]. At present, it is not clear whether animals within the presumed normal weight range are truly comparable to in vivo–produced controls [8, 9]. Nuclear transfer calves in the normal range for birth weight showed several physiological alterations that indicate epigenetic perturbations [12].

Epigenetic modifications of the genome include methylation of DNA at cytosine residues; histone protein modifications, such as acetylation and methylation; and the modification and assembly of regulatory protein complexes on DNA. These modifications can be functionally linked and are reversible [1–3]. Methylation of cytosine residues at CpG dinucleotides is the most extensively characterized epigenetic mark in mammals, and it generally is associated with transcriptional silencing and imprinting [1, 3, 13]. During germ cell development, loss of DNA methylation is associated with the erasure of imprinting marks, which subsequently are reset in the developing gametes. After fertilization, during the second phase of large-scale epigenetic reprogramming, genome-wide demethylation is observed in early preimplantation development, followed by remethylation thereafter, but imprinted DNA methylation is maintained [13]. Comparative work demonstrates methylation reprogramming in all mammalian species analyzed, but the extent and the timing vary, consistent with notable differences between species during preimplantation development [13–15]. The presence of DNA methylation in embryos brings about the deacetylation of histone H4 and the methylation of Lys9 of histone H3, and it prevents the methylation of Lys4 of histone H3. This highlights the importance of DNA methylation patterns established during early embryogenesis for setting up the structural profile of the genome [16].

Bovine embryo culture systems and NT can alter the expression of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) in bovine preimplantation-stage embryos, and available data suggest that maintenance and de novo DNA methylation can be affected [17]. The analysis of sequence-specific DNA methylation [18, 19] and the investigation of chromosomal or global methylation patterns [20–22] have revealed highly aberrant DNA methylation profiles in bovine preimplantation NT embryos in comparison with IVF embryos. To our knowledge, however, comparisons with ex vivo embryos have not been performed; thus, IVF effects have not been determined. Global DNA hypermethylation in NT embryos was associated with histone H3 Lys9 hypermethylation and poor developmental potential in vitro [22]. Furthermore, significant DNA hypermethylation was detected in liver, but not in placenta, of viable Day-80 bovine NT fetuses with LOS, suggesting that abnormal DNA methylation is maintained in surviving NT embryos and is associated with the LOS phenotype. In that same study, overgrown IVF fetuses that were generated with high concentrations of gonadotropins and serum in the embryo culture medium showed a tendency toward hepatic hypermethylation [23]. A previous study, in contrast, reported significant genomic DNA hypomethylation in skin samples from aborted Day-30 to Day-210 NT fetuses. That same study failed to detect significant differences between IVF fetuses and in vivo controls. However, the specific IVF procedures were not reported, and fetal phenotype was not described [24].

We have analyzed viable Day-80 bovine IVF fetuses in comparison with in vivo–fertilized controls to determine the effects of two bovine IVF protocols, which differed with respect to gonadotropin concentrations during oocyte maturation and serum concentration during embryo culture, on fetal phenotype and genomic cytosine methylation level in tissues derived from the three different germ layers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Unless otherwise indicated, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.

Oocyte Recovery and In Vitro Maturation

All cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) were obtained from Fleckvieh or Braunvieh ovaries. Ovaries for postmortem collection of oocytes were obtained from commercial abattoirs and transported to the laboratory in PBS at 25–30°C within approximately 2 h. The COCs were collected from batches of 50–100 ovaries as described previously [25]. The COCs for the first IVF protocol (IVF1) were collected in a 50-ml centrifuge tube and washed twice with preincubated (39°C, 5% CO2 in air) Tissue Culture Medium 199 (TCM 199; Invitrogen) supplemented with L-glutamine (100 mg/L), NaHCO3 (3 g/L), Hepes (1400 mg/L), sodium pyruvate (250 mg/L), L-lactic-Ca-salt (600 mg/L), gentamicin (55 mg/L), and 10% (v/v) estrous cow serum (ECS). The maturation medium consisted of supplemented TCM 199 with 0.01 U/ml of bovine FSH and bovine LH (Sioux Biochem). The COCs were washed in maturation medium, transferred to four-well plates (Nunc), and matured in 400 µl of medium for 20–24 h at 39°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in humidified air.

The COCs for IVF protocol 2 (IVF2) were washed twice in TCM 199 (Biochrom) with 10% ECS and washed once in TCM 199 (Biochrom) supplemented with L-glutamine (100 mg/L), NaHCO3 (3 g/L), Hepes (1400 mg/L), sodium pyruvate (250 mg/L), L-lactic-Ca-salt (600 mg/L), gentamicin (55 mg/L; Biochrom), and 10% ECS. The COCs were matured in four-well plates (Nunc) with 400 µl of TCM 199 supplemented with 0.2 U/ml of ovine FSH (Ovagen ICP Bio Ltd.). Oocytes were matured for 20–24 h at 39°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air and maximum humidity. Additional COC batches for IVF2 were obtained by ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration in vivo as described previously [26]. Follicle aspiration was performed at the Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture in accordance with the relevant guidelines for the care and use of animals and with approval by the responsible animal welfare authority, the Regierung von Oberbayern. The COCs were aspirated into TCM 199 (Biochrom) with 3% fetal calf serum (Biochrom) and heparin sodium salt (60 µg/ml), filtered with PBS in an Em Con Filter (Immuno Systems, Inc.), and further processed as described above.

IVF and Culture of Embryos

Fleckvieh and Braunvieh semen obtained from commercial artificial insemination (AI) stations (Prüf-und Besamungsstation München-Grub, Poing, Germany and Zweckverband II für künstliche Besamung der Haustiere, Greifenberg, Germany) was used with the corresponding type of oocytes to generate embryos. Matured COCs for IVF1 were washed three times in Tyrode albumin lactate pyruvate (TALP) medium containing 2.2 mg/ml of sodium pyruvate, 10 µg/ml of heparin sodium salt, and 6 mg/ml of BSA. The COCs were transferred to 400 µl of TALP medium. Frozen-thawed spermatozoa were subjected to the swimup procedure for 90 min. Then, the COCs and spermatozoa were coincubated for 18 h in maximum humidity at 39°C and in 5% CO2 in humidified air. The COCs for IVF2 were treated in an identical manner, but TALP medium contained 20 µg/ml of heparin sodium salt.

The presumptive zygotes for IVF1 were mechanically denuded by vortexing and gentle pipetting; washed three times in synthetic oviduct fluid (SOF) culture medium enriched with 5% ECS, 20 µl/ml of 100x basal medium (Invitrogen), and 10 µl/ml of 100x minimum essential medium (Invitrogen); and transferred to 400-µl droplets of medium covered with mineral oil. The culture atmosphere was 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 at 39°C and maximum humidity. The presumptive zygotes for IVF2 were treated in an identical manner, but SOF medium contained 10% ECS and 55 µg/ml of gentamicin.

Embryo Transfer, AI, and Recovery of Fetuses

On Day 7 after IVF, embryos were transferred nonsurgically to estrous-synchronized recipient heifers. Control embryos were generated by inseminating Fleckvieh and Braunvieh heifers with frozen-thawed semen. Semen used in IVF1 and IVF2 also was used for in vivo inseminations. Heifers diagnosed as pregnant were slaughtered in a local abattoir on Day 80 after IVF or insemination. The uterus was removed from the recipient and cut open, and fetal blood was collected from the umbilical cord to obtain plasma samples (see below). Fetal weight and length as well as fetal organ weights (heart, kidney, and liver) were recorded. Liver, muscle, and brain tissue samples were collected on ice and stored frozen at –20°C until further processing for DNA isolation. All samples were collected by the same person following standardized procedures. Liver samples were collected from the tip of the lobus hepatis sinister. Muscle samples were obtained from the musculus gluteus maximus. Brain samples were collected from the upper-left hemisphere of the cerebrum. All experiments involving animals were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines for the care and use of animals and with approval by the responsible animal welfare authority, the Regierung von Oberbayern.

Isolation of DNA and Quantification of 5-Methylcytosine

Total cellular DNA was isolated from tissue samples with the E.Z.N.A. Tissue DNA Kit II (PEQLAB Biotechnologie GmbH). Detailed protocols for the quantification of genomic 5-methylcytosine (5mC) by capillary electrophoresis have been published previously [27–29]. Briefly, the cellular DNA was digested to single nucleotides, derivatized with Bodipy FL EDA, and separated by capillary electrophoresis. The DNA samples from liver were analyzed with a Bio-Rad BioFocus 3000TC LIF2 system and the samples from brain and muscle with a Beckman Coulter PACE MDQ LIF system. Electropherograms were analyzed using the software supplied with the respective system, and 5mC levels were determined using derivatization factors established previously [27, 28]. At least three replicates were measured for liver samples, and at least six replicates were measured for brain and muscle samples. We have already demonstrated high reproducibility with both systems [29].

Clinicochemical Parameters in Fetal Plasma

Fetal blood was collected in lithium-Heparin-coated, 1-ml tubes (KABE Labortechnik) and then centrifuged for 10 min at 4500 x g to obtain plasma samples. Isolated plasma aliquots were stored at –20°C until further use. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) was determined by IGF-R20 RIA Kit (Mediagnost), with a lower detection limit of 0.15 ng/ml and intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of less than 10%. All other parameters were assayed with an Olympus AU 400 autoanalyzer and adapted reagents from Olympus and Roche. Calibration and quality control were performed according to the manufacturer's protocols and recommendations. The selected parameter list (alanin aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, calcium, chloride, cholesterol, creatine kinase, creatine kinase muscle-brain, creatinine, {gamma}-glutamyltransferase, glucose, inorganic phosphorus, iron, potassium, sodium, triglycerides, and urea) is part of the clinicochemical screen in the Munich ENU mouse mutagenesis project and is used routinely to uncover clinically relevant phenotypes [30].

Statistics

Both ANOVA and calculation of least-square means were performed with SAS version 8.02 [31] using the general linear model procedure. Treatment group (control, IVF1, and IVF2) means were adjusted for effects of gender (male and female) and genetics (Fleckvieh and Braunvieh). Differences between groups were considered to be significant (two-sided t-test) at P < 0.05. Linear and quadratic regressions were fitted with GraphPad Prism version 3.00 and were considered to be significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Number of Recovered Fetuses

Twenty-nine viable Day-80 fetuses were recovered in total. Fifteen of the fetuses were generated by IVF and 14 by AI. The transfer of 18 IVF1 and 69 IVF2 embryos yielded five (27.8%) and 10 (14.5%) viable Day-80 fetuses, respectively. The collection mode of oocytes used in IVF2, aspiration postmortem or ex vivo, had no effect on the number of transferred embryos that developed into Day-80 fetuses. Thirty-three transferred IVF2 embryos generated with oocytes collected postmortem yielded five (15.2%) fetuses, and 36 IVF2 embryos generated with oocytes collected ex vivo yielded an additional five (13.9%) fetuses. Furthermore, the mean fetal weights (see below) of both IVF2 collectives showed no difference (P = 0.359). Therefore, the data for all IVF2 fetuses (n = 10) were combined for statistical analyses and comparisons with the IVF1 (n = 5) and control (n = 14) groups.

Phenotypic Characteristics of Fetuses

The ANOVA showed that fetal group (control, IVF1, and IVF2) significantly affected fetal weight (P = 0.0025) and length (P = 0.0030) as well as heart (P = 0.0029) and liver (P = 0.0006) weight. The IVF1 fetuses did not differ from in vivo controls, but IVF2 fetuses revealed phenotypic abnormalities. The IVF2 fetuses were heavier (19.9%, P = 0.0008) and longer (4.7%, P = 0.012), with increased heart (25.2%, P = 0.003) and liver (27.9%, P = 0.0002) weights, thus displaying a fetal overgrowth phenotype (Fig. 1). Kidney weight and all relative organ weights, however, were not affected.


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Mean ± SEM for phenotypic characteristics of viable Day-80 bovine fetuses. Fetuses were generated by in vivo insemination (control [Ctrl]), IVF1, or IVF2. Significant differences between groups are denoted by asterisks. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Genomic 5mC Content in Liver, Muscle, and Brain DNA

We analyzed the global cytosine methylation level of DNA samples from fetal liver, muscle, and brain by a highly sensitive capillary electrophoresis method (Fig. 2A). The 5mC content determined for individual samples ranged from 2.29% to 3.61% in liver, from 4.88% to 6.56% in muscle, and from 3.13% to 5.50% in brain. The amounts of 5mC in hepatic DNA (3.036% ± 0.068%; mean ± SEM throughout), muscle DNA (5.971% ± 0.086%), and cerebral DNA (4.777% ± 0.1350%) differed significantly (P < 0.0001). The ANOVA indicated that hepatic 5mC levels were significantly (P = 0.0001) affected by fetal group. Hepatic methylation levels in both groups of IVF fetuses differed significantly from those of in vivo controls. We observed DNA hypomethylation (–16.1%, P = 0.006) in IVF1 fetuses and hypermethylation (+11.2%, P = 0.004) in IVF2 fetuses. A significant but less pronounced DNA hypomethylation (–9.3%, P = 0.043) also was detected in muscle tissue of IVF1 fetuses. Cerebral 5mC level was not affected by fetal group (Fig. 2B).


Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Quantification of genomic cytosine methylation levels (% 5mC) in DNA samples from viable Day-80 fetuses generated by in vivo insemination (control [Ctrl]), IVF1, or IVF2. A) Examples of electropherograms obtained for DNA samples from individual fetuses. The 5mC peaks are indicated by arrowheads. B) Mean ± SEM for cytosine methylation levels in fetal liver, muscle, and brain tissue. Significant differences between groups are denoted by asterisks. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Clinicochemical Parameters in Fetal Plasma

A clinicochemical screen of fetal plasma was performed to search for additional potential abnormalities not revealed by fetal phenotype. The ANOVA showed that only four of the 18 parameters were significantly affected by fetal group: creatinine (P = 0.001), glucose (P = 0.037), IGF1 (P = 0.0007), and potassium (P = 0.049). No significant differences were found in these four parameters between IVF1 fetuses and AI controls, but IVF2 fetuses revealed significantly increased levels of creatinine (+37.5%, P = 0.0003), glucose (+70.2%, P = 0.014), IGF1 (+40.8%, P < 0.0007), and potassium (+23.9%, P = 0.019) (Fig. 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Mean ± SEM for clinicochemical parameters in umbilical cord blood plasma that were significantly (P < 0.05) influenced by fetal group in ANOVA. Fetuses were generated by in vivo insemination (control [Ctrl]), IVF1, or IVF2. Significant differences between groups are denoted by asterisks. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Relationships Between Liver 5mC Level, Clinicochemical Parameters, and Phenotype

Regression analyses revealed significant nonlinear relationships between liver weight and liver 5mC and between creatinine and liver 5mC in the data set. Nonlinear regressions became linear when a reduced data set without IVF1 fetuses was analyzed. In contrast, regressions of IGF1 on liver 5mC and of phenotypic parameters on IGF1 were always linear with both data sets (Fig. 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Regressions of phenotypic and clinicochemical characteristics of Day-80 fetuses on the cytosine methylation level (5mC) of liver DNA samples and plasma IGF1 level. Regressions were calculated with (solid line) or without (dotted line) data from hypomethylated fetuses generated by IVF1. The IVF1 data are circled, and significance levels of regression lines are indicated.

DISCUSSION

In vitro fertilization is practiced routinely in various species, including cattle and sheep, in which its application has been hindered by LOS and associated health problems. The apparently normal phenotype of Day-80 fetuses generated with the IVF1 protocol is consistent with observations that appropriate modifications in IVF protocols can lead to a reduced incidence of LOS [9, 32, 33]. Some features of the overgrown Day-80 fetuses that were generated with the IVF2 protocol have been reported previously, but at much later stages of gestation. This includes a general increase in fetal size and weight and organ-specific organomegaly [4–8]. In sheep and bovine, LOS has been associated with the presence of exogenous protein, particularly serum, during in vitro embryo culture [34, 35]. The major differences between IVF1 and IVF2 protocols used in the present study are the amount and type of gonadotropins in the oocyte maturation medium, the serum batch, and the amount of serum in the embryo culture medium. The IVF1 fetuses were generated with a reduced amount of serum (5% vs. 10% in IVF2) during embryo culture and showed normal fetal and organ weights. We have performed an additional experiment with a single batch of serum and combined either one of the maturation procedures from IVF1 and IVF2 protocols with the embryo culture procedures of the IVF2 protocol. Both combinations yielded overgrown Day-80 fetuses, with virtually identical group means that were indistinguishable from the mean weight of the IVF2 fetuses in the present study (95.3 ± 5.4 and 95.6 ± 5.4 g with n = 8 each vs. 95.1 ± 4.8 g with n = 10 for IVF2). This points to the amount of serum in the embryo culture medium as the cause of the IVF2 protocol–dependent LOS phenotype.

Large-scale DNA methylation reprogramming takes place during preimplantation development and provides a window for epigenetic perturbations that may affect transcription during and after in vitro embryo procedures [13, 35]. In the bovine, the male pronucleus is actively demethylated shortly after fertilization [14, 19–21]. A further passive loss of methylation occurs from the 2- to 8-cell stage [14, 19–21], followed by de novo methylation by the 16-cell stage [21]. Nuclear transfer embryos are characterized by insufficient demethylation and precocious de novo methylation, which appears to be responsible for extensive global, chromosomal, and sequence-specific hypermethylation [18–22]. This observation was recently extended to viable Day-80 NT fetuses with LOS, in which significant hepatic genomic hypermethylation was observed [23]. A previous study, in contrast, reported significant hypomethylation of DNA obtained from skin biopsy samples of viable and aborted NT fetuses. The same study failed to detect significant DNA methylation differences in skin samples of Day-45 to Day-60 IVF-fetuses in comparison to Day-56 to Day-62 in vivo controls [24]. The present data, however, indicate that IVF procedures can significantly affect DNA methylation (i.e., induce DNA hyper- and hypomethylation) in bovine embryos in a tissue-specific manner. A variety of protocols are presently employed to generate bovine IVF and NT embryos, and protocol-specific differences therefore might explain discrepancies in results. Tissue-specific differences, as demonstrated in the present study, also could account for divergent results. We observed no effect of IVF procedures on cerebral DNA methylation level. Both brain and skin are derived from ectoderm, and DNA methylation levels are established around gastrulation and are assumed to be maintained in somatic cells throughout subsequent organogenesis and differentiation [13, 36]. Our results have been derived with a highly accurate method that has been designed to quantify DNA methylation levels only from intact, chemically derivatizable DNA [27–29]. The overall methylation levels detected in the present study ranged from 2.29% to 3.61% in liver, from 3.13% to 5.50% in brain, and from 4.88% to 6.56% in muscle DNA samples. This is in excellent agreement with published data regarding a variety of differentiated mammalian tissues [37, 38].

To our knowledge, all the studies that have investigated bovine preimplantation DNA methylation level and its perturbation by NT used IVF embryos as standard and/or controls [18–22, 39]. The present data indicate that not only NT but also different IVF protocols can significantly affect DNA methylation in bovine embryos. Some of the inconsistencies and variations in DNA methylation data from different studies of bovine NT and IVF embryos [14, 40] therefore might reflect differences in IVF protocols.

The degree of DNA hypermethylation in liver of Day-80 IVF2 fetuses with LOS in the present study (+11.2% vs. AI controls) is very similar to the level of hypermethylation previously detected in Day-80 NT fetuses with LOS (+9.2% vs. AI controls) [23]. Thus, increased hepatic DNA methylation levels clearly are associated with bovine LOS, but whether hypermethylation arises by similar or different mechanisms in NT and IVF embryos is not known. It has been proposed that demethylation of somatic donor nuclei after NT could occur through the same active mechanism by which the paternal genome is demethylated after fertilization [21]. This could provide a link between hypermethylation after NT and IVF procedures. However, our data point toward embryo culture conditions and, therefore, later developmental stages during which hypermethylation in IVF2 fetuses developed. Interestingly, recent studies in mice have provided evidence to suggest that reprogramming after NT occurs progressively during preimplantation development and continues into the early postimplantation period [41]. Embryo culture systems and/or NT can affect the expression of DNMTs in bovine preimplantation-stage embryos. Significant differences in the relative abundance of gene transcripts between in vivo– and in vitro–fertilized or NT-derived blastocysts were reported for DNMT1 and between NT-derived blastocysts and the other experimental groups for DNMT3a, suggesting that maintenance and de novo DNA methylation can be affected by IVF and NT procedures [17]. The reported significant increase in expression of DNMT1 in bovine IVF blastocysts [17] is of particular relevance with respect to the present study, because Dnmt1 overexpression causes genomic hypermethylation and loss of imprinting in the mouse [42].

Global hypermethylation (see above) and sequence-specific DNA hypomethylation [23, 43, 44] have been associated previously with LOS after in vitro embryo culture and/or NT. Our detection of genomic DNA hypomethylation in liver (–16.1% vs. AI controls) and muscle (–9.3% vs. AI controls) tissue of the limited number of IVF1 fetuses is a novel and unexpected finding. Our search for abnormalities in clinicochemical parameters of fetal plasma failed to identify significant differences between IVF1 fetuses and AI controls. Instead, we detected significantly increased IGF1, creatinine, glucose, and potassium levels in hypermethylated overgrown IVF2 fetuses (Fig. 3). All these parameters, particularly IGF1 and creatinine, showed significant relationships with fetal phenotype (Fig. 4). Furthermore, regressions of liver weight, IGF1, and creatinine on liver 5mC levels were significant, linear, and positive when control AI fetuses and IVF2 fetuses were analyzed. This suggests a link between hypermethylation and LOS phenotype of IVF2 fetuses, but a causal relationship has yet to be established. The inclusion of data from hypomethylated IVF1 fetuses yielded nonlinear regressions for liver weight and creatinine (Fig. 4). This might indicate subtle changes in IVF1 fetuses related to hypomethylation.

Altered tissue expression and plasma levels of several IGF system components, particularly IGF2 receptor, have been associated previously with epigenetic change and LOS in sheep, but IGF1 was not investigated in those studies [43, 44]. The essential role of IGF1 for fetal growth was demonstrated by gene-targeting experiments in the mouse [45] and by the phenotype of a human patient with a deletion in the IGF1 gene [46]. Expression of IGF1 is highest in fetal liver and muscle [47], where it regulates eukaryotic initiation factor 4F formation [48]. The IGF1 peptide stimulates myoblast survival, proliferation, and differentiation [49], and it has protein anabolic effects in the sheep fetus [50]. Significant relationships between IGF1 levels in umbilical cord blood and fetal weight and length that are similar to those shown by our data have been reported previously in humans [51]. Fetal and organ weights also were significantly correlated with creatinine (not shown), an end product from creatine and phosphocreatine. Creatine is synthesized in the liver, exported to the circulation, and taken up by muscle, where it is converted to phosphocreatine, an energy source for muscle cells [52]. Thus, more than 90% of the total creatine stores are found in muscle, and serum creatinine is directly correlated with muscle mass [53].

The phenotypic outcome of embryos derived by IVF can be variable. Accumulating evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms may be disturbed by manipulation and/or culture conditions in various species [4–8, 17]. We have shown that bovine IVF procedures can affect genomic DNA methylation status in tissue of early fetuses, but the physiological relevance and persistence of these changes have yet to be determined. Tissue-specific transcriptome experiments in combination with genomic and sequence-specific methylation data at different developmental stages could clarify causal relationships and effects of the observed methylation differences.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank W. Scholz for excellent technical assistance and P. Rieblinger for animal care.

FOOTNOTES

1 Supported by the Institute for Science and Health (St. Louis, MO) pursuant to Task Order Agreement 03–0900–01RFA02 (to O.J.S.) and a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Priority Program Epigenetics; to F.L.). Back

2 Correspondence and current address: Stefan Hiendleder, Department of Animal Science, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia. FAX: 61 8 8303 7972; stefan.hiendleder{at}adelaide.edu.au Back

Received: 18 May 2005.

First decision: 8 June 2005.

Accepted: 21 February 2006.

REFERENCES

  1. Li E, Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Genet 2002 3:662-673
  2. Grewal SI, Moazed D, Heterochromatin and epigenetic control of gene expression. Science 2003 301:798-802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Meehan RR, DNA methylation in animal development. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2003 14:53-65[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Sinclair KD, Young LE, Wilmut I, McEvoy TG, In-utero overgrowth in ruminants following embryo culture: lessons from mice and a warning to men. Hum Reprod 2000 15:suppl_568-86
  5. Walker SK, Hartwich KM, Robinson JS, Long-term effects on offspring of exposure of oocytes and embryos to chemical and physical agents. Hum Reprod Update 2000 6:564-577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Eggan K, Akutsu H, Loring J, Jackson-Grusby L, Klemm M, Rideout WM, III, Yanagimachi R, Jaenisch R, Hybrid vigor, fetal overgrowth, and viability of mice derived by nuclear cloning and tetraploid embryo complementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 98:6209-6214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Shi W, Zakhartchenko V, Wolf E, Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian nuclear transfer. Differentiation 2003 71:91-113[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Farin CE, Farin PW, Piedrahita JA, Development of fetuses from in vitro–produced and cloned bovine embryos. J Anim Sci 2004 82: (suppl E) E53-E62[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Sangild PT, Schmidt M, Jacobsen H, Fowden AL, Forhead A, Avery B, Greve T, Blood chemistry, nutrient metabolism, and organ weights in fetal and newborn calves derived from in vitro–produced bovine embryos. Biol Reprod 2000 62:1495-1504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bertolini M, Anderson GB, The placenta as a contributor to production of large calves. Theriogenology 2002 57:181-187[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Wells DN, Forsyth JT, McMillan V, Oback B, The health of somatic cell cloned cattle and their offspring. Cloning Stem Cells 2004 6:101-110[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Chavatte-Palmer P, Remy D, Cordonnier N, Richard C, Issenman H, Laigre P, Heyman Y, Mialot JP, Health status of cloned cattle at different ages. Cloning Stem Cells 2004 6:94-100[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Morgan HD, Santos F, Green K, Dean W, Reik W, Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum Mol Genet 2005 14:Suppl 1R47-R58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Beaujean N, Hartshorne G, Cavilla J, Taylor J, Gardner J, Wilmut I, Meehan R, Young L, Nonconservation of mammalian preimplantation methylation dynamics. Curr Biol 2004 14:R266-R267[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Shi W, Dirim F, Wolf E, Zakhartchenko V, Haaf T, Methylation reprogramming and chromosomal aneuploidy in in vivo–fertilized and cloned rabbit preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod 2004 71:340-347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Hashimshony T, Zhang J, Keshet I, Bustin M, Cedar H, The role of DNA methylation in setting up chromatin structure during development. Nat Genet 2003 34:187-192[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Wrenzycki C, Niemann H, Epigenetic reprogramming in early embryonic development: effects of in vitro production and somatic nuclear transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2003 7:649-656[Medline]
  18. Kang YK, Koo DB, Park JS, Choi YH, Chung AS, Lee KK, Han YM, Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos. Nat Genet 2001 28:173-177[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Kang YK, Park JS, Koo DB, Choi YH, Kim SU, Lee KK, Han YM, Limited demethylation leaves mosaic-type methylation states in cloned bovine preimplantation embryos. EMBO J 2002 21:1092-1100[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Bourc'his D, Le Bourhis D, Patin D, Niveleau A, Comizzoli P, Renard JP, Viegas-Pequignot E, Delayed and incomplete reprogramming of chromosome methylation patterns in bovine cloned embryos. Curr Biol 2001 11:1542-1546[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Dean W, Santos F, Stojkovic M, Zakhartchenko V, Walter J, Wolf E, Reik W, Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 98:13734-13738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Santos F, Zakhartchenko V, Stojkovic M, Peters A, Jenuwein T, Wolf E, Reik W, Dean W, Epigenetic marking correlates with developmental potential in cloned bovine preimplantation embryos. Curr Biol 2003 13:1116-1121[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Hiendleder S, Mund C, Reichenbach HD, Wenigerkind H, Brem G, Zakhartchenko V, Lyko F, Wolf E, Tissue-specific elevated genomic cytosine methylation levels are associated with an overgrowth phenotype of bovine fetuses derived by in vitro techniques. Biol Reprod 2004 71:217-223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Cezar GG, Bartolomei MS, Forsberg EJ, First NL, Bishop MD, Eilertsen KJ, Genome-wide epigenetic alterations in cloned bovine fetuses. Biol Reprod 2003 68:1009-1114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Stojkovic M, Krebs O, Kolle S, Prelle K, Assmann V, Zakhartchenko V, Sinowatz F, Wolf E, Developmental regulation of hyaluronan-binding protein (RHAMM/IHABP) expression in early bovine embryos. Biol Reprod 2003 68:60-66[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Bruggerhoff K, Zakhartchenko V, Wenigerkind H, Reichenbach HD, Prelle K, Schernthaner W, Alberio R, Kuchenhoff H, Stojkovic M, Brem G, Hiendleder S, Wolf E, Bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer using recipient oocytes recovered by ovum pick-up: effect of maternal lineage of oocyte donors. Biol Reprod 2002 66:367-373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Stach D, Schmitz OJ, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, Dohner H, Wiessler M, Lyko F, Capillary electrophoretic analysis of genomic DNA methylation levels. Nucleic Acids Res 2003 31:e2[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Wirtz M, Stach D, Kliem H-C, Wiessler M, Schmitz OJ, Determination of the DNA methylation level in tumor cells by capillary. Electrophoresis 2004 25:839-845[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Lyko F, Stach D, Benner A, Stilgenbauer S, Döhner H, Wirtz M, Wiessler M, Schmitz OJ, Quantitative analysis of DNA methylation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Electrophoresis 2004 25:1530-1535[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Rathkolb B, Decker T, Fuchs E, Soewarto D, Fella C, Heffner S, Pargent W, Wanke R, Balling R, Hrabe de Angelis M, Kolb HJ, Wolf E, The clinical–chemical screen in the Munich mouse mutagenesis project: screening for clinically relevant phenotypes. Mamm Genome 2000 11:543-546[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. SAS/STAT Software. Release 8.02 Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc 2001
  32. Galli C, Duchi R, Crotti G, Turini P, Ponderato N, Colleoni S, Lagutina I, Lazzari G, Bovine embryo technologies. Theriogenology 2003 59:599-616[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Breukelman SP, Reinders JM, Jonker FH, de Ruigh L, Kaal LM, van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw AM, Vos PL, Dieleman SJ, Beckers JF, Perenyi Z, Taverne MA, Fetometry and fetal heart rates between Day 35 and 108 in bovine pregnancies resulting from transfer of either MOET, IVP-coculture, or IVP-SOF embryos. Theriogenology 2004 61:867-882[Medline]
  34. Sinclair KD, McEvoy TG, Carolan C, Maxfield EK, Maltin CA, Young LE, Wilmut I, Robinson JJ, Broadbent PJ, Conceptus growth and development following in vitro culture of ovine embryos in media supplemented with bovine sera. Theriogenology 1998 49:218
  35. Lazzari G, Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Duchi R, Kruip T, Niemann H, Galli C, Cellular and molecular deviations in bovine in vitro–produced embryos are related to the large offspring syndrome. Biol Reprod 2002 67:767-775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Jaenisch R, DNA methylation and imprinting: why bother?. Trends Genet 1997 13:323-329[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Gama-Sosa MA, Midgett RM, Slagel VA, Githens S, Kuo KC, Gehrke CW, Ehrlich M, Tissue-specific differences in DNA methylation in various mammals. Biochim Biophys Acta 1983 740:212-219[Medline]
  38. Romanov GA, Vanyushin BF, Methylation of reiterated sequences in mammalian DNAs. Effects of the tissue type, age, malignancy and hormonal induction. Biochim Biophys Acta 1981 653:204-218[Medline]
  39. Kang YK, Yeo S, Kim SH, Koo DB, Park JS, Wee G, Han JS, Oh KB, Lee KK, Han YM, Precise recapitulation of methylation change in early cloned embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 2003 66:32-37[Medline]
  40. Fairburn HR, Young LE, Hendrich BD, Epigenetic reprogramming: how now, cloned cow?. Curr Biol 2002 12:R68-R70[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Gao S, Latham KE, Maternal and environmental factors in early cloned embryo development. Cytogenet Genome Res 2004 105:279-284[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Biniszkiewicz D, Gribnau J, Ramsahoye B, Gaudet F, Eggan K, Humpherys D, Mastrangelo MA, Jun Z, Walter J, Jaenisch R, Dnmt1 overexpression causes genomic hypermethylation, loss of imprinting, and embryonic lethality. Mol Cell Biol 2002 22:2124-2135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Young LE, Fernandes K, McEvoy TG, Butterwith SC, Gutierrez CG, Carolan C, Broadbent PJ, Robinson JJ, Wilmut I, Sinclair KD, Epigenetic change in IGF2R is associated with fetal overgrowth after sheep embryo culture. Nat Genet 2001 27:153-154[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Young LE, Schnieke AE, McCreath KJ, Wieckowski S, Konfortova G, Fernandes K, Ptak G, Kind AJ, Wilmut I, Loi P, Feil R, Conservation of IGF2-H19 and IGF2R imprinting in sheep: effects of somatic cell nuclear transfer. Mech Dev 2003 120:1433-1442[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Liu JP, Baker J, Perkins AS, Robertson EJ, Efstratiadis A, Mice carrying null mutations of the genes encoding insulin-like growth factor I (Igf-1) and type 1 IGF receptor (Igf1r). Cell 1993 75:59-72[Medline]
  46. Woods KA, Camacho-Hubner C, Savage MO, Clark AJ, Intrauterine growth retardation and postnatal growth failure associated with deletion of the insulin-like growth factor I gene. N Engl J Med 1996 335:1363-1367[Free Full Text]
  47. Fowden AL, The insulin-like growth factors and fetoplacental growth. Placenta 2003 24:803-812[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Shen W, Mallon D, Boyle DW, Liechty EA, IGF-I and insulin regulate eIF4F formation by different mechanisms in muscle and liver in the ovine fetus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2002 283:E593-E603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Crown AL, He XL, Holly JM, Lightman SL, Stewart CE, Characterization of the IGF system in a primary adult human skeletal muscle cell model, and comparison of the effects of insulin and IGF-I on protein metabolism. J Endocrinol 2000 167:403-415[Abstract]
  50. Shen W, Wisniowski P, Ahmed L, Boyle DW, Denne SC, Liechty EA, Protein anabolic effects of insulin and IGF-I in the ovine fetus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2003 284:E748-E756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Ong K, Kratzsch J, Kiess W, Costello M, Scott C, Dunger D, Size at birth and cord blood levels of insulin, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-II, IGF-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), IGFBP-3, and the soluble IGF-II/mannose-6-phosphate receptor in term human infants. The ALSPAC Study Team. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 85:4266-4269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Bemben MG, Lamont HS, Creatine supplementation and exercise performance: recent findings. Sports Med 2005 35:107-125[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Sala A, Tarnopolsky M, Webber C, Norman G, Barr R, Serum creatinine: a surrogate measurement of lean body mass in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005 45:16-19[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. Vogt, M. Huber, M. Thiemann, G. van den Boogaart, O. J. Schmitz, and C. D. Schubart
Production of different phenotypes from the same genotype in the same environment by developmental variation
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2008; 211(4): 510 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
75/1/17    most recent
biolreprod.105.043919v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiendleder, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hiendleder, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hiendleder, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS