Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print September 6, 2006.
Biol Reprod 2006, 10.1095/biolreprod.106.051227
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
75/6/948    most recent
biolreprod.106.051227v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ravera, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morelli, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ravera, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morelli, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ravera, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morelli, A.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 75, 948–953 (2006)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.051227
© 2006 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


research-article

First Cell Cycles of Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus Are Dramatically Impaired by Exposure to Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field

Silvia Ravera , Carla Falugi , Daniela Calzia , Isidoro M. Pepe 1, Isabella Panfoli , and Alessandro Morelli 

Department of Biology, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy

ABSTRACT

Exposure of fertilized eggs of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus to an electromagnetic field of 75-Hz frequency and low amplitudes (from 0.75 to 2.20 mT of magnetic component) leads to a dramatic loss of synchronization of the first cell cycle, with formation of anomalous embryos linked to irregular separation of chromatids during the mitotic events. Because acetylcholinesterase (ACHE) is thought to regulate the embryonic first developmental events of the sea urchin, its enzymatic activity was assayed in embryo homogenates and decreased by 48% when the homogenates were exposed to the same pulsed field. This enzymatic inactivation had a threshold of about 0.75 ± 0.01 mT. The same field threshold was found for the effect on the formation of anomalous embryos of P. lividus. Moreover, ACHE inhibitors seem to induce the same teratological effects as those caused by the field, while blockers of acetylcholine (ACh) receptors are able to antagonize those effects. We conclude that one of the main causes of these dramatic effects on the early development of the sea urchin by field exposure could be the accumulation of ACh due to ACHE inactivation. The crucial role of the membrane in determining the conditions for enzyme inactivation is discussed.

acetylcholinesterase inactivation, anomalous embryos, early development, embryo, sea urchin, fertilization, LF-EMF effects, neurotransmitters, Paracentrotus lividus

INTRODUCTION

The effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) on biological systems have been widely investigated. Several studies indicate that ELF-EMFs affect cell division timing and embryo development of many organisms [14], although a sound explanation of such effects is not available so far. A suitable experimental model for this kind of study is the well-known early development of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus, because embryos can be obtained in large numbers, are transparent, and display synchronous development [5, 6]. Exposure to ELF-EMFs can induce alterations in the timing of the cell cycle of sea urchins by advancing the first and second cell divisions [7]. A similar effect of acceleration of the cell cleavages was observed when sea urchin embryos were exposed to fields with a frequency of 5 kHz, well above the ELF range [8]. An opposite effect, although in different experimental conditions, was found after continuous exposure of sea urchin embryos to a cyclic 60-Hz magnetic field, which caused a significant developmental delay during the subsequent 23 h [9].

Herein, we report an investigation on the effect of an ELF-EMF of 75-Hz frequency on the early developmental events of the sea urchin P. lividus, from zygote to the eight-blastomere stage. A dramatic loss of synchronization of the first cell cycle was observed, with formation of anomalous embryos in the successive cleavages, linked to irregular separation of chromatids during the mitotic events.

To give an interpretation of the macroscopic effects produced by ELF-EMFs at the molecular level, our attention was focused on the enzymatic activity of acetylcholinesterase (ACHE). In fact, cholinergic molecules of the neurotransmitter system were found to play a role during fertilization and the early cell cycles of a large number of invertebrate and vertebrate organisms [1013]. Addition of acetylcholine (ACh) to sea urchin eggs before fertilization can cause developmental anomalies [14, 15]. Moreover, the involvement of ACh binding to muscarinic receptors was proposed in the modulation of the nuclear status during the first cell cycle [14]. The enzyme ACHE, which was found in ovarian eggs of sea urchin using immunofluorescence [15] and whose activity was revealed after fertilization in cortical granules [16], is thought to regulate the embryonic first developmental events [17]. Therefore, ACHE activity of embryos was assayed and was found to be decreased when exposed to the same field, suggesting a strict correlation between the enzymatic inactivation and the formation of sea urchin anomalous embryos.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

ACh chloride and 2,6-diamidine-4-phenylindole (DAPI) were from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO). All other reagents were of analytical grade.

Gamete Handling and Fertilization

Gametes from the sea urchin P. lividus were obtained in the laboratory, according to the usual methods: eggs were obtained by intracoelomic injection of 0.5 M KCl and were collected in ultrafiltered seawater (SW); sperm were collected "dry" and were stored at 4°C for no more than 2 days. For fertilization, 5 µl of the sea urchin sperm was added to 1 ml of SW, and 10 µl of this diluted sperm was added to six bowls (three for test and three for control), each containing about 2000 eggs in 20 ml of SW. Immediately after fertilization, samples were exposed to the ELF-EMF for the duration of the experiment as described herein. The extent of fertilization was checked at 30 sec to 1 min after addition of sperm; experiments were carried out only when more than 85% of eggs raised the fertilization layer within 5 min. Fertilization and development were carried out at 20°C in a temperature-controlled room. Experiments were repeated five times, in different seasonal periods. For each experiment, eggs and sperm of five adult specimens were used. At the end of exposures, embryos were stained, and three slides for each test were prepared. For each slide, three random microscope fields were analyzed, and anomalous embryos were counted vs. normal ones. The count was stopped when 110 embryos per microscope field (20x) were counted, analyzing 330 embryos for each slide. In total, about 1000 embryos per bowl were counted. Statistical elaboration of data was performed, including percentage of embryos, SD, and Student-Neuman-Keuls test.

Embryo Homogenate Preparations

Eggs were fertilized, and embryos were frozen at –80°C after 70 min (corresponding to the first division). Thawed embryos (1 ml) were homogenized in a small glass-glass potter on ice in ultrafiltered SW. The sample was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min at 4°C, and the pellet (2 mg/ml of protein) was resuspended in ultrafiltered SW and used for the assay of ACHE activity. Protein content was determined by the method of Bradford [18].

Electromagnetic Field Production

EMFs were produced using equipment (Biostim Igea, Modena, Italy) mainly used for clinical application and already described [19, 20]. The generator system supplies a square wave with a maximal applied tension of 180 V, a period of 13.3 milliseconds (75-Hz frequency), a duty cycle of 10%, to a couple of identical coils aligned on a central axis. Each coil, made up of 1000 turns of copper wire with a diameter of 0.2 mm, had internal and external diameters of 72.5 mm and 82.5 mm, respectively. Because the current supplied by the equipment to the coils was not adjustable, different flux density magnetic fields were obtained by separating the two coils with different distances. Measurements of the magnetic field B maximal intensity with a gaussmeter showed that it was fairly constant midway between the coils, giving values of about 2.20 ± 0.08 mT when the distance between the coils was 12 cm and about 0.45 ± 0.02 mT at 29.6-cm distance. An error of 0.5 cm in determining the distance between the coils gave an error of 4% in the field measurements. The values of the field near the threshold were determined more accurately (1% SD, n = 10). Because of an erroneous calibration of the gaussmeter, the values of magnetic fields that appear in previous publications [20, 21] in which the same exposure system was used should be multiplied by a factor of 9. The time course of the magnetic field and that of the induced electric field were measured as already described [19, 20] at the center of the distance between the two coils where the samples were placed. Temperature variations of the order of magnitude of experimental error (± 0.1°C) were measured with a thermocouple inside the sample in the presence of the applied field.

Exposure Conditions

About 2000 eggs were fertilized in 20 ml of ultrafiltered SW in a glass cuvette, and immediately after fertilization, an aliquot of 10 ml was exposed for 150 min to the ELF-EMF in a glass Petri dish (5-cm diameter) put at the center of the exposure system as already described. The remaining 10 ml of the sample was considered a control not exposed to the field. The control and the sample were maintained in the same conditions of temperature, light, and evaporation for the duration of the experiment. After 150 min, 10 ml of paraformaldehyde (4%) was added to the control or to the sample to stop the development of sea urchins. These rates were used for morphological and histochemical analyses.

Experiments were repeated eight times, using gametes obtained from different adult specimens collected from the wild (Portofino bay) in different periods.

Morphological Aspects

The morphology of the embryos was analyzed on a Wild stereomicroscope. Photographs were taken with a Leitz microscope, equipped with a photographic apparatus (Leica, I).

Histochemical Staining of DNA

Embryos stored in methanol were rehydrated with 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH 7. The buffer was replaced twice and then was substituted with a solution of DAPI 1:1000 in citrate buffer and incubated for 5 min in the dark. The DAPI causes fluorescence of DNA, binding to A-T clusters in the small DNA furrow. After rinsing with citrate buffer, samples were mounted on a slide supplied with antifading Gelvatol [22] and observed on a Zeiss microscope equipped with UV (wavelength, {lambda} = 360–400 nm).

ACHE Activity Assay

ACHE activity of embryo homogenate preparations was measured using ACh chloride (Sigma) as a substrate by monitoring the choline production as already described [23]. Briefly, embryo homogenate preparations (30 µg of total protein) were added to a reaction mixture (240 µl) containing 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, without the substrate and were exposed to the field. The enzymatic activity was measured during the exposure to the field of 75 Hz by adding 10 µl of 0.25 mM acetylcholine. The reaction was blocked by withdrawal of 100 µl of reaction mixture, to which was added 50 µl of 25% PCA (perchloric acid). Samples clarified by centrifugation were neutralized with 50 µl of 2 M K2CO3. Centrifugation was repeated to remove salt. Control samples were run in the same experimental conditions but in the absence of field. Neutralized extracts were used for choline assay by adding 0.5 mM DTNB (5,5'-Dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid)) in phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 (1-ml final volume), following the formation of nitrobenzoate by spectrophotometrically monitoring the rise in absorbance at 405 nm. Optical densities were converted to rates of nitrobenzoate production by using the molar extinction coefficient of 1.33 mmol–1 mm–1.

RESULTS

An ELF-EMF (75 Hz) of 2.20 ± 0.08 mT magnetic amplitude was applied soon after fertilization of sea urchin eggs for the duration of the experiments. At about 150 min after fertilization, while the controls showed the usual synchronous development corresponding to embryos at eight-blastomere stage (Fig. 1A), about 80% of the exposed samples showed shape anomalies, such as membrane wrinkles and a loss of synchronization: in Figure 1, some embryos showed a deceleration of development to four blastomeres (Fig. 1B), while others were able to develop to eight blastomeres (Fig. 1C) but with a wrinkled and opaque surface. The DAPI fluorescent staining of blastomeres revealed irregular chromatin distribution and size in about 80% of the exposed samples (Fig. 1, B1 and C1) compared with the usual distribution of the control (Fig. 1A1). Panels D, E, and F of Figure 2 show a sort of polarization of chromatin, with the spindles oriented along the same direction. Furthermore, the nuclear material seems to be irregularly distributed (Fig. 2B), fragmented (Fig. 2G), or loosely diffused in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2, C, H, and I).


Figure 75061501
View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 1. Effect of ELF-EMF (75 Hz, 2.2 mT) exposure on P. lividus embryos. The embryos were sampled at the same time of development (at 150 min after fertilization). Upper row: Control embryos, eight-blastomere stage (A). Exposed embryos showing asynchronous development: four-blastomere (B) or eight-blastomere (C) stage, light microscopy. Lower row: DAPI nuclei staining of A, B, and C samples showing nuclear chromatin distribution (A1, B1, and C1 ). In B1, the nucleus of one of the blastomeres is lacking (arrow); the others show asynchronous cell cycle phases. Whole-mount embryos, bar = 90 µm.


Figure 75061502
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 2. The DAPI nuclei staining of P. lividus embryos sampled at 150 min after fertilization. Control: eight-blastomere embryo (A). Exposed embryos showing nuclear anomalous segregation (D, E, and F), nuclear fragmentation (G), and nuclear material irregularly distributed (B) or loosely diffused in the cytoplasm (C, H, and I). Bar = 90 µm.

Similar results were obtained using different amplitudes of the 75-Hz field. Figure 3A shows that the effects of a field amplitude of 1.02 ± 0.04 mT already appeared at the first 10 min of exposure with a percentage of anomalous embryos of about 80%, which remained almost constant during the experiment. Figure 3B shows a typical example of cleavage deregulation: at 10 min of field exposure, three DAPI spots appeared in a cell with a nucleus fragmentation; at 45 min, the cell showed an acceleration with a sort of quadruple cleavage, while at 60 min, a cell appeared with two nuclei and a nuclear fragment. At 150 min, the cleavage seemed decelerated, with irregular chromatin distribution, as already shown in the preceding figures. When the field amplitude was further decreased to 0.45 ± 0.02 mT, the exposed samples showed no effects and were indistinguishable from the controls.


Figure 75061503
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 3. Anomalous P. lividus embryos during exposure to a field of 75-Hz frequency and 1.02-mT magnetic amplitude. The embryos were sampled at the times indicated in the abscissa. S: samples exposed to the field; C: samples of control not exposed to the field. A) Percentage of anomalous embryos as determined by light microscopy. Error bars are SD, the number of embryos examined per experiment was 1000, and the number of experiments was five; P < 0.005 for each value of exposed vs. control. B) DAPI nuclei staining of the embryos sampled at the same times as in A. Bar = 90 µm.

To connect the observed development anomalies of sea urchin eggs to the cholinergic system, the effects of the same ELF-EMF on ACHE activity were measured. Exposure of embryo homogenates to the same field of 75 Hz, 2.2 mT caused a 48% drop in the activity of ACHE, from 9.2 units/mg (±0.4 SD of five measurements) of the control samples to 4.8±0.5 units/mg of the exposed samples. This effect was all or none, independent of the exposure time (range, 5–150 min) and of the field amplitude (range, 2.2–0.80 mT). As shown in Figure 4, an amplitude of about 0.80 ± 0.01 mT was the lowest value that produced a suprathreshold response, while amplitudes of 0.45 mT or 0.75 ± 0.01 mT gave results of enzymatic activities that were statistically indistinguishable from those of the controls (P < 0.001). Enzymatic inhibition was fully reversible on removal of the field and was independent of the exposure time.


Figure 75061504
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 4. Threshold effects of exposure to different field amplitudes on the development of anomalous embryos (white circles) or on ACHE activity of embryo homogenates (black circles). Enzymatic activity, expressed as units/mg of protein (nmole of substrate transformed/min/mg of protein), was measured after 30-min exposures to a 75-Hz magnetic field of different amplitudes. Each value represents the mean ± SD of five measurements. The errors of magnetic field determinations were about 4%, except for the values near the threshold, which were determined more accurately (1% SD, n = 10).

Figure 4 shows the macroscopic effects of different field amplitudes on sea urchin development. At 0.45 mT or 0.75 ± 0.01 mT, the exposed samples showed the same low percentage of anomalous embryos of the controls, while at 0.80 ± 0.01 mT or 1.80 ± 0.07 mT, the percentage of anomalous embryos was about 80%, as for the exposure to 2.2 mT and 1.02 mT amplitudes shown in Figure 1 and in Figure 3. The amplitude of 0.80 ± 0.01 mT was the lowest value that produced a suprathreshold response. This result shows that the effects of field exposure on the sea urchin development have the same amplitude threshold found for the effect on ACHE activity.

To test whether this enzyme indeed functionally mediates between the field and the observed effects on the cells, BW284c51 (1,5-bis [4-allyldimethylammoniumphenyl] pentan-3–1 dibromide) or physostigmine, which are well known ACHE inhibitors, was added to sea urchin eggs soon after fertilization. Such inhibitors affected the DNA structure of 80% of embryos compared with controls (P < 0.005) (Fig. 5). This result may suggest a similarity of action between the treatments with the ACHE inhibitors and the electromagnetic field. However, analysis of the transduction pathways is needed to demonstrate the mechanism of the phenomenon. Conversely, the field effects could be prevented by adding blockers of muscarinic and nicotinic ACh receptors such as atropine and tubocurarine chloride, respectively. Figure 6 shows the development of embryos sampled at 180 min after fertilization at the stage of 32 blastomeres; 100% of embryos exposed to the field in the presence of these blockers are identical to the controls.


Figure 75061505
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 5. Effects of ACHE inhibitors on embryonic development. To the standard samples, 10–5 M BW284c51 (A or B) or 10–5 M physostigmine (C) was added soon after fertilization. The inhibitors were not added to control embryos (D). Embryos were sampled at 150 min after fertilization. This experiment was performed only once, in triplicate. Bar = 90 µm.


Figure 75061506
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 6. Combined effects of embryo exposure to field (75 Hz, 2.2 mT) and to blockers of ACh receptor. Samples were exposed for 180 min to the field soon after fertilization in the presence (A or B) or in the absence (C) of 10–4 M atropine and 10–4 M tubocurarine chloride. Control embryos (D) did not contain the ACh receptor blockers and were not exposed to the field. Embryos were all sampled at 180 min after fertilization. Bar = 90 µm. The number of embryos examined per experiment was 1000. This experiment was performed only once, in triplicate.

The reversibility of the field effects on embryo development was also investigated. Figure 7 shows that the first 5 min of exposure to the 75-Hz field are sufficient to trigger the anomalies in chromatin distribution sampled at the stage of 150 min after fertilization. Moreover, different times of field exposure seem to have the same effects. After several hours (up to 36 h) from the withdrawal of the field, the embryos did not resume their usual prism shape of normal development. They assumed instead anomalous "spheroid" forms similar to those already described in experiments run in the presence of organophosphorous compounds that are ACHE inhibitors [24].


Figure 75061507
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 7. Effects of different exposure times on embryonic development. Samples were exposed soon after fertilization to a field of 75 Hz and 2.2 mT for 5 min (A), 10 min (B), 20 min (C), 40 min (D), 80 min (E), or 150 min (F). Embryos were all sampled at 150 min after fertilization. Bar = 90 µm.

DISCUSSION

The results reported herein show that ELF-EMFs of 75-Hz frequency and low intensities are able to produce strong anomalies in the early development of the sea urchin P. lividus. The field effects were detected morphologically and using DAPI fluorescent staining, which revealed irregular chromatin distribution and size. Alterations in the early embryonic development of the sea urchin due to exposure to magnetic fields have been reported, and differences in the observed effects could be due to difference in the experimental conditions used by various authors. For instance, the choice of field frequency is crucial as the interaction of the electromagnetic wave with molecules can only operate through frequency windows. Therefore, different frequencies can produce different effects. Field frequencies of 5 kHz [8] and 450 MHz [25], which are well above the ELF range, produced an acceleration of the cleavage of embryo cells and an increase in the number of zygotes with abnormal fertilization envelopes, respectively. Fields of 60-Hz frequency, close to the 75 Hz used in our experiments, caused opposite alterations in the timing of the cell cycle of sea urchin embryos, namely, a significant developmental delay [9] or an advance of first and second cell divisions [7], a discrepancy that can be explained by the different experimental conditions set up by the two groups. However, the alterations in the early embryonic development of sea urchin were never shown at the chromosome level by means of DAPI staining. Moreover, we tried to correlate the teratological effects with ACHE inactivation by the field exposure. In fact, ACHE activity was measured in embryo homogenate and was found to be decreased by the field exposure. Moreover, the formation of anomalous embryos had a field threshold of about 0.75 mT, the same threshold found for the inhibitory effect on ACHE activity. This suggests a close correlation between the enzymatic and morphological effects of the applied field. Accumulation of ACh due to ACHE inactivation by the field exposure could be the trigger for the formation of anomalous embryos. The hypothesis that ACHE could functionally mediate between the field and the observed effects on embryos is strengthened by the results shown in Figure 5, in which ACHE inhibitors seem to induce the same teratological effects as those caused by the field. Conversely, blockers of ACh receptors are able to antagonize the effects of the field, giving further support to the biochemical model.

The interactions between molecules related to the cholinergic signal system and the first phases of embryonic development have been investigated [10, 26]. Addition of ACh to zygotes of P. lividus after fertilization led to embryos with anomalous nuclear and chromatin structure [14], similar to those shown in Figure 1. The hypothesis was proposed that muscarinic receptors may be involved in the (presumably Ca2+ dependent) modulation of the nuclear status during the first cell cycles [14]. The correlation between ionic and cytoskeletal dynamics is crucial for the correct embryonic development, particularly for leading the nuclear dysjunction during cleavage [27], ultimately depending on ACh availability. A link between [Ca2+]i variations and the regulation of cytoskeletal elements and events during the first cleavages of sea urchin zygotes and early embryos has been demonstrated [2830]. The inhibition of ACHE is known to cause an overflow of ACh at the receptor sites, affecting the nicotinic and muscarinic receptor state. In the early stages of development of sea urchins, these receptors are known to be involved in sodium [31, 32] and calcium [14] intracellular dynamics. The intracellular concentration of calcium spike, for instance, is in turn responsible for the chromosome metaphasic plate formation by acting on the aster microtubular structure [2830].

With regard to the mechanisms underlying the effects of ELF-EMFs on membrane-associated enzymes, a unified physical-chemical explanation has not been provided yet, despite the large number of reports available [3340]. It was previously found that a field of 75 Hz decreased only the activities of some lipid-linked enzymes such as alkaline phosphatase or ACHE, while it had no effects on the activities of integral membrane enzymes (such as calcium, Na/K, adenosine triphosphatase, and succinic dehydrogenase) or of peripheral membrane enzymes (such as photoreceptor phosphodiesterase) [21]. The decrease in enzymatic activity of the lipid-linked enzymes was independent of the time of permanence in the field and was completely reversible. When these enzymes were solubilized with Triton X-100, no effect of the field was obtained on the enzymatic activity, suggesting the crucial roles of membrane and lipid linkage in determining the conditions for enzyme inactivation.

ACHE and alkaline phosphatase are anchored to the membrane through a glycosylphosphatidylinositol, which allows the protein to move along the membrane surface to meet the substrate molecules. Changing the conditions of the lipid matrix where the enzyme is inserted through its anchor may have a profound effect on the protein flexibility, a requisite for its functional activity. A recent report [41] on alkaline phosphatase incorporated into artificial phospholipid monolayers showed that the formation of aggregated protein clusters, due to a surface pressure increase, caused a drop in enzymatic activity of about 40%. Considering that a significant clustering of the distribution of membrane proteins was induced by a pulsed field of 50 Hz [42], we can speculate that the 75-Hz field used in our experiments would be able to induce a partition of the lipid-anchored enzymes in clusters, with a subsequent activity decrease.

Finally, this article should attract attention on the risks that biological organisms could receive from exposure to electromagnetic fields with frequencies usually generated by high-voltage and low-voltage transmission lines, display terminals, laboratory instrumentations, and home appliances. In the case of ACHE, the effects of accumulation of ACh persist presumably even after the removal of the field and the consequent reversible restoration of ACHE activity. In other words, although the effects of ELF-EMFs are likely transient, the consequences of the exposure can be irreversible.

Correspondence: 1 Isidoro M. Pepe, Department of Biology, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV 3.5, Genova 16132, Italy. FAX: 39 010 353 8153; e-mail: mario.pepe{at}unige.it

Received: 31 January 2006.

First decision: 6 March 2006.

Accepted: 28 August 2006.

REFERENCES

  1. Delgado JMR, Leal J, Monteagudo JL, Gracia MGJ. Embryological changes induced by weak extremely low frequency electromagnetic field. J Anat 1982; 134:533–551[Medline]
  2. Dixey R and Rein G H. Noradrenaline release potentiated in a clonal nerve cell line by low-intensity pulsed magnetic fields. Nature 1982; 296:253–255[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Koch WE, Koch BA, Martin AH, Moses GC. Examination of development of chicken embryos following exposure to magnetic fields. Comp Biochem Physiol Comp Physiol 1993; 105:617–624[Medline]
  4. Cameron IL, Hardman WE, Winters WD, Zimmerman S, Zimmerman AM. Environmental magnetic fields: influences on early embryogenesis. J Cell Biochem 1993; 51:417–425[Medline]
  5. Developmental biology of the sea urchin embryo. Giudice G. 1973.New York: Academic Press;
  6. Qiao D, Nikitina LA, Buznikov GA, Lauder JM, Seidler FJ, Slotkin TA. The sea urchin embryo as a model for mammalian developmental neurotoxicity: ontogenesis of the high-affinity choline transporter and its role in cholinergic trophic activity. Environ Health Perspect 2003; 111:1730–1735[Medline]
  7. Levin M and Ernst SG. Applied AC and DC magnetic fields cause alterations in the mitotic cycle of early sea urchin embryos. Bioelectromagnetics 1995; 16:231–240[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Falugi C, Grattarola M, Prestipino G. Effects of low-intensity pulsed electromagnetic fields on the early development of Paracentrotus lividus. Biophys J 1987; 51:999–1003
  9. Zimmerman S, Zimmerman AM, Winters WD, Cameron IL. Influence of 60-Hz magnetic fields on sea urchin development. Bioelectromagnetics 1990; 11:37–45[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Drews U. Cholinesterase in embryonic development. Prog Histochem Cytochem 1975; 7:1–52[Medline]
  11. Falugi C. Localization and possible role of molecules associated with the cholinergic system during "non nervous" developmental events. Eur J Histochem 1993; 37:287–294[Medline]
  12. Buznikov GA, Shmukler YB, Lauder JM. From oocyte to neuron: do neurotransmitters function in the same way throughout development? Cell Mol Neurobiol 1996; 16:533–559[CrossRef]
  13. Buznikov GA, Koikov LN, Shmukler YB, Whitaker MJ. Nicotinic antagonists reduce the susceptibility of early sea urchin embryos to agents evoking calcium shock. Gen Pharmacol 1997; 29:49–53[Medline]
  14. Harrison PK, Falugi C, Angelini C, Whitaker MJ. Muscarinic signalling affects intracellular calcium concentration during the first cell cycle of sea urchin embryos. Cell Calcium 2002; 31:289–297[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Angelini C, Baccetti B, Piomboni B, Trombino S, Aluigi MG, Stringara S, Gallus L, Falugi C. Acetylcholine synthesis and possible functions during sea urchin development. Eur J Histochem 2004; 48:235–243[Medline]
  16. Progress in Molecular and Subcellular Biology. Angelini C, Aluigi MG, Sgro M, Trombino S, Falugi C. Cell signalling during sea urchin development: a model for assessing toxicity of environmental contaminants. 2005:Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag;46–69. In:
  17. Shmukler YB and Buznikov GA. Functional coupling of neurotransmitters with second messengers during cleavage divisions: facts and hypothesis. Perspect Dev Neurobiol 1998; 5:469–480[Medline]
  18. Bradford MM. A rapid sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72:248–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. De Mattei M, Pasello M, Pellati A, Stabellini G, Massari L, Gemmati D, Caruso A. Effects of electromagnetic fields on proteoglycan metabolism of bovine articular cartilage explants. Connect Tissue Res 2003; 44:154–159[Medline]
  20. Ravera S, Repaci E, Morelli A, Pepe IM, Botter R, Beruto D. Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on the adenylate kinase activity of rod outer segment of bovine retina. Bioelectromagnetics 2004; 25:545–551[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Morelli A, Ravera S, Panfoli I, Pepe I. Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on membrane-associated enzymes. Arch Biochem Biophys 2005; 441:191–198[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Lennet EDA. An improved mounting medium for immunofluorescence microscopy. Am J Clin Pathol 1978; 69:647–648[Medline]
  23. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, vol. 2. Bergmeyer HU. Enzymes. 1983:Weinheim: Verlag Chemie;126–281. In:
  24. Pesando D, Huitorel P, Dolcini V, Angelini C, Guidetti P, Falugi C. Biological targets of neurotoxic pesticides analysed by alteration of developmental events in the Mediterranean sea urchin, Paracentrotus lividus. Mar Environ Res 2003; 55:39–57[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Koldayev VM and Shchepin YV. Effects of electromagnetic radiation on embryos of sea urchins. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 1997; 43:161–164[CrossRef]
  26. Neurotransmitters in Embryogenesis. Buznikov GA. 1990: Chur: Harwood Academic Press;526–537
  27. Whitaker MJ and Swann K. Lighting the fuse at fertilisation. Development 1993; 117:1–20[Abstract]
  28. Wilding M, Wright EM, Patel R, Ellis-Davies G, Whitaker MJ. Local perinuclear calcium signals associated with mitosis-entry in early sea urchin embryos. J Cell Biol 1996; 135:191–199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yazaki I, Tosti E, Dale B. Cytoskeletal elements link calcium channel activity and the cell cycle in early sea urchin embryos. Development 1995; 121:1827–1831[Abstract]
  30. Groigno I and Whittaker MJ. An anaphase calcium signal controls chromosome disjunction in sea urchin embryos. Cell 1998; 92:193–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Falugi C and Prestipino G. Localization of putative nicotinic cholinoreceptors in the early development of Paracentrotus lividus. Cell Mol Biol 1989; 35:147–161[Medline]
  32. Ivonnet PI and Chambers EL. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors of the neuronal type occur in the plasma membrane of the sea urchin eggs. Zygote 1997; 5:277–287[Medline]
  33. Glaser R. Current concepts of the interaction of weak electromagnetic fields with cells. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 1992; 27:255–268[CrossRef]
  34. Advances in Chemistry Series, vol. 250. Walleczek J. Electromagnetic fields: biological interactions and mechanisms. 1995:Washington: American Chemical Society;396–404. In:
  35. Barnes FS. Effect of electromagnetic fields on the rate of chemical reactions. Biophysics 1996; 41:801–808
  36. Kaiser F. External signals and oscillation dynamics: biophysical aspects and modelling approaches for interactions of weak electromagnetic fields at the cellular level. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 1996; 41:3–18
  37. Lacy-Hulbert A, Metcalfe JC, Hesketh R. Biological responses to electromagnetic fields. FASEB J 1998; 12:395–420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Neumann E. Digression on chemical electromagnetic field effects in membrane signal transduction: cooperativity paradigm of the acetylcholine receptor. Bioelectrochemistry 2000; 52:43–49[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Weaver JC. Understanding conditions for which biological effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields can be expected. Bioelectrochemistry 2002; 56:207–209[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Volpe P. Interactions of zero-frequency and oscillating magnetic fields with biostructures and biosystems. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2003; 2:637–648[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Caseli L, Oliveira RG, Masui DCM, Furriel RP, Leone FA, Maggio B, Zaniquelli MED. Effect of molecular surface packing on the enzymatic activity modulation of an anchored protein on phospholipid Langmuir monolayers. Langmuir 2005; 21:4090–4095[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Bersani F, Marinelli F, Ognibene A, Matteucci A, Cecchi S, Squarzoni F, Maraldi NM. Intramembrane protein distribution in cell cultures is affected by 50 Hz pulsed magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 1997; 18:463–469[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
75/6/948    most recent
biolreprod.106.051227v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ravera, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morelli, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ravera, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morelli, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ravera, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morelli, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS