Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 18, 2006.
Biol Reprod 2006, 10.1095/biolreprod.106.050880
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
76/2/218    most recent
biolreprod.106.050880v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Danforth, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Danforth, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Danforth, D. R.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 76, 218–223 (2007)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.050880
© 2007 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


research-article

Neutralization of Endogenous Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Depletes Primordial Follicles in the Mouse Ovary1

Amanda E. Roberts 3 4, Laura K. Arbogast 4, Chad I. Friedman 4, David E. Cohn 4, Pravin T. Kaumaya 4, and Douglas R. Danforth 2 3 4

Departments of Animal Sciences3 and Obstetrics and Gynecology,4 The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210

ABSTRACT

The regulation of early follicular growth and development involves a complex interaction of autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine signals. The ability of these factors to regulate follicle growth may depend in part on the extent of vascular delivery to and perfusion of the ovary. Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) is a major regulator of vascular physiology in the ovary. VEGFA is produced in numerous ovarian compartments and likely plays a role in the regulation of all phases of follicular growth, from preantral through preovulatory. The aim of the present study was to further evaluate the role of VEGF in early follicle growth by neutralization of endogenous VEGF or VEGF receptors. Adult mice were injected systemically and prepubertal mice were injected directly under the ovarian bursa with antibodies designed to neutralize VEGF or block interaction with its receptors in the ovary. Both systemic and intrabursal injections of VEGF antibody significantly reduced the number of primordial follicles within 1–3 days after administration without affecting primary or secondary follicle numbers. Primordial follicle numbers were not different from control levels by 30 days after VEGFA antibody administration. Administration of antibodies to the kinase domain receptor (KDR), but not the FMS-like tyrosine receptor (FLT1), for VEGF also resulted in a significant decrease in primordial follicles. These data suggest that VEGF plays a vital role in the maintenance and growth of the primordial follicle pool.

follicle, follicular development, ovary

INTRODUCTION

The formation, survival, and growth of the preantral follicle pool in the mammalian ovary is a dynamic process regulated by a variety of autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine signals [1]. The complex interaction of these factors may orchestrate the movement of primordial follicles into the growing pool or destine them for atresia. Central to the function of endocrine and paracrine signals is their ability to reach their target cell via vascular delivery and/or diffusion.

One of the most important local regulators of ovarian vascular physiology is vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) [24]. Along with stimulating neovascularization, VEGFA also regulates vascular permeability. VEGFA production and increased blood vessel extension are associated with follicle activation [5]. VEGFA is produced by the thecal and/or granulosa cells in the ovary [610], and granulosa cells secrete VEGFA in response to stimulation by gonadotropins [6, 1113]. After ovulation, luteal cells continue expression of VEGFA [14, 15]. Neutralization of VEGFA activity with antibodies [16] or a soluble form of the VEGF receptor [17] disrupts follicular development and corpus luteum function [1820].

In addition to its role in the later stages of follicle growth, VEGFA also may play an important role in the activation and development of preantral follicles. Although immunohistochemical studies generally confirm that follicular VEGFA expression increases as follicles mature [2123], several reports reveal expression of VEGF in preantral follicular compartments. VEGFA protein has been identified in the oocytes of human primordial [24, 25] and human and rat primary [25, 26] follicles. Kezele et al. [27] identified VEGFA as one of the important genes upregulated during primordial follicle development in the mouse. We have shown previously that VEGFA administration increases the number of primary and small secondary follicles in the rodent ovary [28]. Administration of VEGFA directly to the ovary results in an increase in preantral follicle numbers in a dose- and time-dependent manner. In addition, estrogen upregulates VEGFA expression in the rodent ovary similarly to its effects on early follicle growth [28]. These data suggest a potential role for VEGFA in primordial follicle activation. As such, we hypothesized that neutralization of endogenous VEGFA might alter initial follicle growth and perhaps disrupt maintenance of the primordial follicle pool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Production of VEGF Antibodies

Antigen selection and generation was based on previous work in our laboratory with antibodies against HER2 [29]. In this approach, an antigenic B-cell epitope of VEGFA (residues 127–144, common to VEGF A–G) was selected using Peptide Companion software (CSPS Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, CA). This peptide sequence is located in the carboxy terminal domain, which is important for the mitogenic actions of VEGFA [30]. The B-cell epitope was colinearly synthesized with a promiscuous TH epitope (measles virus fusion protein [MVF] 288–302), using a four-residue amino acid linker, GPSL. All peptides were synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis and were purified by semipreparative reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography as described previously [31]. The identity of the peptide MVF-VEGFA was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectroscopy. A schematic representation of the peptide construct is provided in Figure 1. Throughout this manuscript, we have used VEGFA to describe that specific isoform and elsewhere used VEGF when describing our data, since our antibody will recognize various forms of VEGF (A, B, C, D, etc.).


Figure 76020601
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of VEGF chimeric constructs. An antigenic B-cell epitope of VEGF (residues 127–144) was colinearly synthesized with a promiscuous T-cell epitope (MVF residues 288–302) using a four-residue (GPSL) amino acid linker. This construct was injected into adult New Zealand rabbits to generate polyclonal antisera as described in Materials and Methods.

Adult Female New Zealand White rabbits (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) received an initial injection of 1 mg/ml MVF-VEGFA, which was dissolved in H2O with 100 µg nor-MDP (N-acetylglucosamine-3 yl-acetyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine). Montanide ISA-720 was used to emulsify the peptide solution. Booster injections (0.5 mg/ml) were given twice, 3 wk apart. Blood samples were collected prior to the first injection and once a week thereafter. VEGF antibodies were purified from heat-inactivated serum using a protein A column (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Antibody titers were determined using ELSA as previously described [29]. Since MVF by itself is not immunogenic [29], we chose to use preimmune serum from the same rabbits used for VEGF antibody generation as controls for our experiments.

All studies were approved by the Institutional Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee at The Ohio State University and were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of laboratory animals.

VEGF Antibody Treatments

Twenty-four adult (6–8 wk old) female C57Bl/6 mice (Harlan) were injected i.p. with 55 µg VEGF antibody in 100 µl PBS. Control mice received a corresponding amount of preimmune serum IgG. Injections were given every 3 days for 2 wk. Mice were killed at various time points, and both ovaries were removed and fixed for tissue processing. Vaginal smears were obtained via vaginal lavage every day for 30 days and were evaluated for estrous cycle status [32].

For some experiments, VEGF antibody was administered under the bursa of the ovary as previously described [28]. Prepubertal female C57Bl/6 mice were anesthetized, and each ovary was injected under the bursa with 1 µl VEGF antibody or a corresponding amount of preimmune rabbit IgG. Mice were killed at various time points (8 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 30 days), and both ovaries were removed and prepared for histological analysis. We used adult mice for the systemic (longer-term) study to avoid the potential confounding effects of VEGF neutralization on pubertal development. Prepubertal mice were used for the intrabursal experiments to provide a more homogeneous ovarian physiology and histological architecture.

Tissue Processing

Tissues were processed as previously described [28]. Briefly, ovaries were removed from fixative, dehydrated, and embedded in Paraplast (Fisher Scientific, Houston, TX) before being sectioned (7-µm thickness) and stained with Lillies allochrome. To avoid counting a follicle more than once, follicles were counted on every fifth section throughout the ovary (approximately 20–30 sections per ovary were counted), and only follicles containing an oocyte were counted. Primordial follicles were described as those having a small oocyte with a single layer of squamous granulosa cells. Primary follicles had an intact enlarged oocyte with a visible nucleus and a single layer of cuboidal granulosa cells. Secondary follicles had two or more layers of cuboidal granulosa cells. Secondary follicles were further classified as small if they contained fewer than four layers of granulosa cells and large if they contained four or more layers of granulosa cells.

Western Blot Analysis

Western blots characterizing VEGF antibodies were performed as previously described [28]. Briefly, 10 ng recombinant human (hu) VEGFA, 50ng of recombinant mouse (mou) VEGFA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), and 5 µg pancreatic tumor lysate were electrophoresed on a 12% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose. The pancreatic tumor was obtained from the Rip1-Tag2 transgenic mouse, which spontaneously develops pancreatic tumors expressing VEGFA [33]. Nitrocellulose membranes were probed with commercially available rabbit polyclonal VEGFA antibody (A-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnologies), VEGF peptide antibody, or purified IgG from preimmune serum. Primary antibodies were diluted 1:500 and detected with goat anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies).

Statistical Analysis

Results are depicted as the mean ± SEM. Potential differences in estrous cycle lengths and follicle numbers were analyzed by analysis of variance followed by a least significant difference test or by a paired Student t-test when appropriate. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant for all analyses

RESULTS

Western blotting experiments confirmed that our VEGF peptide antibodies recognized both mouse and human recombinant VEGFA proteins (Fig. 2). It is unclear why the recombinant human VEGFA protein migrates slightly faster in our system than recombinant mouse VEGFA. In addition, these antibodies recognized a predominant 23-kDa band (presumably VEGFA165) in pancreatic tumor lysate, along with a slightly higher molecular weight protein (~32 kDa) in this biological sample. These data are similar to the results obtained with a commercially available antibody specific for VEGFA. Immunoblotting with purified IgG from preimmune serum revealed no specific binding to pure VEGFA proteins or tumor lysate.


Figure 76020602
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 2. Western blot of pancreatic tumor cell lysate, human (hu) VEGF, and mouse (mou) VEGF using commercially available (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies) and VEGF peptide antibodies. Purified IgG from preimmune serum was included as a negative control.

Figure 3 reveals the effects of VEGF neutralization following i.p. antibody administration on preantral follicles in adult mice. Within 3 days after a single VEGF peptide antibody injection, the number of primordial follicles had decreased by more than 50%. Additional VEGF peptide antibody injections maintained but did not increase the destruction of primordial follicles seen after the first injection. In contrast, VEGF antibodies had no effect on primary or secondary follicle numbers throughout the study. Six months after the initial injection (and 5.5 mo after the last injection) primordial follicle numbers were not different from those observed in control mice. There were no significant changes in primordial follicles within either the control or VEGF antibody treatment groups in this experiment.


Figure 76020603
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 3. Effect of systemic VEGF peptide antibody injection on preantral follicle survival. Adult mice (n = 25) were injected twice per week for 2 wk with 55 µg VEGF peptide antibody or purified IgG from preimmune serum, and the ovaries were removed at various time points for quantitation of preantral follicle numbers as indicated in Materials and Methods. Values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 versus control, n = 3 animals per time point, except for 6 mo, in which four animals per group were used.

Systemic VEGF neutralization also disrupted estrous cyclicity in these mice. Within 3 days following the initial antibody injection, mice began to display persistent vaginal cornification; the interval between estrous vaginal smears was significantly reduced from 5.9 ± 0.2 days before treatment to 1.7 ± 0.2 days after VEGF antibody injection (P < 0.05, n = 3 per group).

It is possible that systemic administration of VEGF antibody could have effects outside the ovary that could have an impact on primordial follicle growth and survival. Therefore, we investigated whether direct ovarian administration of VEGF peptide antibodies would affect primordial follicle numbers. VEGF peptide antibody was injected under the bursa of one ovary, and a corresponding amount of preimmune IgG was injected under the bursa of the contralateral ovary. Thus, the effects of neutralization of ovarian VEGF could be determined with each animal serving as its own control. Direct ovarian administration of VEGF peptide antibody resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the number of primordial follicle numbers compared with control (preimmune IgG) ovaries, with a maximal effect at 5–25 µg VEGF antibody (P < 0.05, n = 3 to 4 per group; Fig. 4).


Figure 76020604
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 4. Dose-response effect of intrabursal VEGF antibodies on primordial follicle survival. Prepubertal mice were injected with 0.5–25 µg VEGF antibodies under the bursa of one ovary. The contralateral ovary served as a control and was injected with purified IgG from preimmune serum. The ovaries were removed 72 h after injection and prepared for histology as described in Materials and Methods. Values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 versus control, n = 4 animals per dose, except for the 2.5-µg dose, in which three animals per group were used.

We compared our VEGF peptide antibodies against a commercially available VEGF antibody preparation (AF-493-NA) from R&D Systems (Fig. 5). Both antibody preparations significantly depleted primordial follicles in the mouse ovary (P < 0.05, n = 4 to 6 per group). Similarly to the results obtained with systemic antibody administration, intrabursal administration of VEGF antibodies had no effect on primary or secondary follicle numbers (data not shown).


Figure 76020605
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 5. Effect of intrabursal injection of VEGF peptide antibodies (left panel, n = 4) and commercially available VEGFA antibodies (right panel, n = 6). Prepubertal mice were injected with 5 µg anti-VEGF antibody in 1 µl saline under the bursa of one ovary. The contralateral ovary received 5 µg preimmune IgG in 1 µl saline as control. Ovaries were removed 72 h later and analyzed for primordial follicle numbers as described in Materials and Methods. Values are mean ± SEM.

We also investigated the time course of primordial follicle destruction by VEGF antibody treatment (Fig. 6). Intrabursal administration of VEGF peptide antibody resulted in a relatively rapid destruction of primordial follicles within 24 h after injection. Follicle depletion was still evident at 3 days; however, primordial follicle numbers were not different from control by 30 days after injection.


Figure 76020606
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 6. Time course of primordial follicle destruction by VEGF peptide antibodies. Prepubertal mice were injected with 5 µg VEGF peptide antibody in 1 µl saline under the bursa of one ovary. The contralateral ovary received 5 µg preimmune IgG in 1 µl saline as control. Ovaries were removed at specific time points and analyzed for primordial follicle numbers as described in Materials and Methods. Values are the mean ± SD of n = 2 at 8 h, n = 3 at 24 h, n = 2 at 48 h, n = 4 at 72 h, and n = 4 at 30 days. Note: the error bar for the 24-h time point is contained within the symbol.

Since our antibody preparation binds VEGF directly, it is not useful in determining which VEGF receptor (KDR or FLT1) might be important for primordial follicle growth and survival. Therefore, we performed an additional experiment examining the effects of direct ovarian administration of commercially available antibodies that bind KDR (VEGFR2) or FLT1 (VEGFR1; R&D Systems). Figure 7 reveals that treatment with antibodies that bind KDR but not FLT1 resulted in a statistically significant depletion of primordial follicles similar to that observed with anti-VEGF antibodies


Figure 76020607
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 7. Effect of antibodies against FLT1 and KDR on primordial follicle survival. Prepubertal mice (n = 5 per group) were injected with 5 µg anti-FLT1 or KDR antibody in 1 µl saline under the bursa of one ovary. The contralateral ovary received 5 µg preimmune IgG in 1 µl saline as control. Ovaries were removed 72 h later and analyzed for primordial follicle numbers as described in Materials and Methods. Values are mean ± SEM.

DISCUSSION

The data presented here provide the first evidence that endogenous VEGF is important for primordial follicle survival in the rodent ovary. Administration of antibodies directed against an antigenic peptide region of the VEGF molecule resulted in a rapid and profound loss of primordial follicles in the ovary. Similarly, antibodies that specifically block the KDR receptor also resulted in primordial follicle depletion. Direct ovarian administration of antibodies also depleted primordial follicles, indicating that neutralization of ovarian VEGF, as opposed to peripheral neutralization, is key to primordial follicle destruction.

The factors responsible for the formation, growth, and survival of the primordial follicle pool are largely unknown. Although primordial follicle activation can occur in the absence of LH, FSH, or estrogen, it is clear that under normal physiological conditions primordial follicle growth occurs amid a rich milieu of endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine factors [34, 35]. It is unknown if or how these factors might interact to influence the primordial follicle population. We and others have hypothesized that that the availability of an adequate vascular supply to provide endocrine and paracrine signals may play a key role in the regulation of early follicle growth [1, 36]. The data presented here on the importance of endogenous VEGF for primordial follicle survival are consistent with this hypothesis.

Although the majority of research on the ovarian VEGF system has focused on the latter (antral) stages of follicle growth and corpus luteum function, previous data from our laboratory have suggested an important role for VEGFA in early follicle growth as well [28]. Administration of VEGFA directly to the rat ovary resulted in an increase in preantral follicle numbers in a dose- and time-dependent manner. In addition, estrogen upregulated VEGFA expression in the rodent ovary is similar to its effects on early follicle growth [28]. VEGFA also has been shown to be localized in the granulosa and thecal cells of preantral follicles [21], as well as the oocytes of primordial and primary follicles [24, 25]. These findings, along with our present data, provide important evidence that the ovarian VEGF system may be a critical component of early follicle physiology in the rodent ovary. Interestingly, however, in the present study VEGF neutralization only depleted primordial follicles; there were no differences in primary or secondary follicle numbers after either systemic or intrabursal antibody administration. This may reflect the especially labile nature of the primordial follicle pool: this population is exquisitely sensitive to radiation- or chemotherapy-induced follicle destruction. Alternatively, higher doses or more prolonged exposure to neutralizing antibodies might be required for effects on primary and secondary follicles to be manifest.

In addition to depleting primordial follicles in the ovary, systemic administration of VEGF peptide antibodies also disrupted estrous cyclicity in the mouse. Shortly after VEGF antibody administration, mice displayed persistent vaginal cornification similar to that observed in aging mice just prior to ovarian senescence [37]. Neutralization of endogenous VEGF has been demonstrated to inhibit ovulation [38], and it is possible that the presence of cornified cells in the vaginal smears is due to continued estrogen production by unovulated antral follicles persisting in the ovary for a few days after antibody administration. Indeed, four of six VEGF antibody-treated mice had not ovulated by 7 days after systemic antibody administration, whereas six of six control mice had ovulated. Alternatively, systemic administration of VEGF antibodies also might alter uterine and vaginal function, which might manifest in altered vaginal cytology. Other investigators have demonstrated effects of VEGF neutralization on uterine function in rodents [39, 40].

The depletion of primordial follicles by VEGF neutralization is rapid; however, over time this depletion of the follicular pool appeared to abate. Primordial follicle numbers were decreased within 24 h following intrabursal administration of VEGF peptide antibodies and remained below control levels for at least 3 days. Within 30 days the effect of VEGF neutralization was no longer apparent, and primordial follicle numbers were not different from control. It is important to note, however, that the number of primordial follicles did not increase over time after either systemic or intrabursal antibody administration.

It is unknown whether primordial follicle depletion following VEGF neutralization is due to a direct effect of VEGF on follicular units or is mediated via changes in the vascular compartment of the ovary. Certainly, neutralization of endogenous VEGF would likely affect angiogenesis and vascular permeability, as these are two of the primary effects of VEGFA in most tissues studied to date. It is perhaps less likely that changes in new vessel formation are involved, since the effects of VEGF antibody treatment are observed within 24 h, although neutralization of VEGF could result in endothelial cell apoptosis with resultant vascular compromise. We did not quantitate potential changes in angiogenesis in the present study. Changes in vascular permeability and, as such, delivery of important endocrine and paracrine modulators of early follicle growth may be a more important component of the effects observed.

Alternatively, increasing evidence suggests that VEGFA may have direct effects on nonvascular elements in a variety of tissues, including the ovary, although many of these studies are somewhat limited. VEGFA and its receptors have been identified tentatively in granulosa cells, thecal cells, oocytes, and zona pellucida [21, 2426, 41]. VEGFA also has been shown to directly stimulate granulosa cell function in vitro [22]. As such, it is possible that the effects of VEGFA on the preantral follicle might be mediated by direct actions on follicular components rather than indirectly via alterations in vascular physiology.

Our data indicate that inhibition of VEGF binding to the KDR but not FLT1 receptor is important for primordial follicle survival in the mouse ovary. Ovarian administration of antibodies to KDR resulted in significant depletion of primordial follicle numbers, whereas anti-FLT1 antibodies did not. This is consistent with previous data in the literature indicating that the KDR receptor is the primary mediator of VEGF action and that the FLT1 receptor might serve as a decoy for VEGF [3]. Indeed, Zimmermann et al. [42] demonstrated that antibodies against KDR delayed follicular selection and development in the Rhesus monkey. However, it should be noted that we only used one dose of VEGF receptor antibodies, and it is possible that higher doses, longer treatment, or different FLT1 antibody preparations might also result in primordial follicle depletion similar to our results with KDR antibodies.

A recent report by Johnson et al. [43] proposed that the follicular pool is a dynamic rather than stagnant population. These authors suggested that a constant vascular influx of bone marrow-derived stem cells is required to maintain the primordial follicle population. VEGF neutralization might interfere with the delivery of stem cells to the ovary or disrupt new primordial follicle formation. Kezele et al. [27] has shown that VEGF expression is upregulated during primordial follicle development. While the importance of bone marrow stem cell migration remains controversial, its potential role in the loss of primordial follicles following neutralization of endogenous VEGF warrants further investigation.

We chose to develop our own antibodies against VEGF in order to have an ample supply to conduct long-term in vivo studies and to investigate potential applications of active immunotherapy for other (cancer) studies. In order to develop a pan-specific antibody capable of neutralizing the majority of VEGF isoforms, we chose a conserved peptide sequence found in the majority of VEGF species (VEGF A–G). Coupling antigenic regions of the VEGF molecule with a promiscuous T-cell epitope is a useful strategy for development of novel antigens for generation of polyclonal antibodies and for exploring active immunization for a variety of therapies. This approach resulted in specific VEGF antisera comparable to commercially available sources. Although we have not determined the affinity of this particular antibody, other antibodies developed using this technology displayed affinities similar to traditional polyclonal antibodies generated against intact proteins [31, 44, 45]. Our VEGF peptide antibody did detect an additional higher-molecular weight protein in the pancreatic tumor cell lysate, and the identity of this protein is unknown at present, although its molecular weight is roughly consistent with that of VEGFA189. It is noteworthy that our protein A-purified antibody preparation is much less pure than the affinity-purified antibody preparation we used for comparison from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, yet the specificities are remarkably similar. Indeed, the data obtained with commercially available antibodies to VEGFA and KDR were nearly identical to those obtained with our VEGF peptide antibodies, suggesting that the effects on primordial follicles we observed were due to specific inhibition of VEGF interaction with its receptor in the ovary and not to nonspecific toxic effects of the antibody preparation. Moreover, the similar response to acute versus long-term antibody treatment argues against nonspecific toxic effects on the ovary. Finally, the lack of effect on primary and secondary follicles suggests that specific neutralization of VEGF is responsible for primordial follicle destruction in the ovary.

In summary, these studies provide compelling evidence that endogenous VEGF is essential for primordial follicle survival in the rodent. Disruption of VEGF interaction with its receptors results in a rapid and pronounced loss of primordial but not other preantral follicles in the ovary. Along with previous studies supporting the role of VEGF in early follicle growth, we conclude that the ovarian VEGF system is an integral component of early follicle growth and survival in the rodent ovary.

FOOTNOTES

1Supported in part by the Ohio Agriculture Research and Development Center (Proposal ID: 2003-094). Back

Correspondence: 2Douglas R. Danforth, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 400 Tzagournis Medical Research Facility, 420 W.12th Ave., Columbus, OH 43221. FAX: 614 688 3551; e-mail: danforth.2{at}osu.edu

Received: 11 January 2006.

First decision: 1 February 2006.

Accepted: 16 October 2006.

REFERENCES

  1. Danforth DR. Endocrine and paracrine control of oocyte development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172:747–752[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Hazzard TM and Stouffer RL. Angiogenesis in ovarian follicular and luteal development. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 14:883–900[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Fraser HM and Wulff C. Angiogenesis in the primate ovary. Reprod Fertil Dev 2001; 13:557–566[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med 2003; 9:669–676[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Mattioli M, Barboni B, Turriani M, Galeati G, Zannoni A, Castellani G, Berardinelli P, Scapolo PA. Follicle activation involves vascular endothelial growth factor production and increased blood vessel extension. Biol Reprod 2001; 65:1014–1019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lee A, Christenson LK, Patton PE, Burry KA, Stouffer RL. Vascular endothelial growth factor production by human luteinized granulosa cells in vitro. Hum Reprod 1997; 12:2756–2761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kamat BR, Brown LF, Manseau EJ, Senger DR, Dvorak HF. Expression of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor by human granulosa and theca lutein cells. Role in corpus luteum development. Am J Pathol 1995; 146:157–165[Abstract]
  8. Barboni B, Turriani M, Galeati G, Spinaci M, Bacci ML, Forni M, Mattioli M. Vascular endothelial growth factor production in growing pig antral follicles. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:858–864[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Friedman CI, Danforth DR, Herbosa-Encarnacion C, Arbogast L, Alak BM, Seifer DB. Follicular fluid vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations are elevated in women of advanced reproductive age undergoing ovulation induction. Fertil Steril 1997; 68:607–612[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Pietrowski D and Keck C. Differential regulation of ANG2 and VEGF-A in human granulosa lutein cells by choriogonadotropin. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2004; 112:208–214[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Duffy DM and Stouffer RL. Luteinizing hormone acts directly at granulosa cells to stimulate periovulatory processes: modulation of luteinizing hormone effects by prostaglandins. Endocrine 2003; 22:249–256[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Koos RD. Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth/permeability factor in the rat ovary following an ovulatory gonadotropin stimulus: potential roles in follicle rupture. Biol Reprod 1995; 52:1426–1435[Abstract]
  13. Hazzard TM, Molskness TA, Chaffin CL, Stouffer RL. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin regulation by gonadotrophin and steroids in macaque granulosa cells during the peri-ovulatory interval. Mol Hum Reprod 1999; 5:1115–1121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Dickson SE, Bicknell R, Fraser HM. Mid-luteal angiogenesis and function in the primate is dependent on vascular endothelial growth factor. J Endocrinol 2001; 168:409–416[Abstract]
  15. Goede V, Schmidt T, Kimmina S, Kozian D, Augustin HG. Analysis of blood vessel maturation processes during cyclic ovarian angiogenesis. Lab Invest 1998; 78:1385–1394[Medline]
  16. Zimmermann RC, Xiao E, Husami N, Sauer MV, Lobo R, Kitajewski J, Ferin M. Short-term administration of antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody in the late follicular phase delays follicular development in the rhesus monkey. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86:768–772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wulff C, Wiegand SJ, Saunders PT, Scobie GA, Fraser HM. Angiogenesis during follicular development in the primate and its inhibition by treatment with truncated Flt-1-Fc (vascular endothelial growth factor Trap(A40)). Endocrinology 2001; 142:3244–3254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wulff C, Wilson H, Rudge JS, Wiegand SJ, Lunn SF, Fraser HM. Luteal angiogenesis: prevention and intervention by treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor trap (A40). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86:3377–3386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ferrara N, Chen H, Davis-Smyth T, Gerber HP, Nguyen TN, Peers D, Chisholm V, Hillan KJ, Schwall RH. Vascular endothelial growth factor is essential for corpus luteum angiogenesis. Nat Med 1998; 4:336–340[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Fraser HM, Dickson SE, Lunn SF, Wulff C, Morris KD, Carroll VA, Bicknell R. Suppression of luteal angiogenesis in the primate after neutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor. Endocrinology 2000; 141:995–1000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Yamamoto S, Konishi I, Tsuruta Y, Nanbu K, Mandai M, Kuroda H, Matsushita K, Hamid AA, Yura Y, Mori T. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) during folliculogenesis and corpus luteum formation in the human ovary. Gynecol Endocrinol 1997; 11:371–381[Medline]
  22. Greenway J, Connor K, Pedersen HG, Coomber BL, LaMarre J, Petrik J. Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, Flk-1/KDR, are cytoprotective in the extravascular compartment of the ovarian follicle. Endocrinology 2004; 145:2896–2905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Taylor PD, Hillier SG, Fraser HM. Effects of GnRH antagonist treatment on follicular development and angiogenesis in the primate ovary. J Endocrinol 2004; 183:1–17[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Otani N, Minami S, Yamoto M, Shikone T, Otani H, Nishiyama R, Otani T, Nakano R. The vascular endothelial growth factor/fms-like tyrosine kinase system in human ovary during the menstrual cycle and early pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84:3845–3851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Harata T, Ando H, Iwase A, Nagasaka T, Mizutani S, Kikkawa F. Localization of angiotensin II, the AT1 receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme, aminopeptidase A, adipocyte-derived leucine aminopeptidase, and vascular endothelial growth factor in the human ovary throughout the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:433–439[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Celik-Ozenci C, Akkoyunlu G, Kayisli UA, Arici A, Demir R. Localization of vascular endothelial growth factor in the zona pellucida of developing ovarian follicles in the rat: a possible role in destiny of follicles. Histochem Cell Biol 2003; 120:383–390[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Kezele PR, Ague JM, Nilsson E, Skinner MK. Alterations in the ovarian transcriptome during primordial follicle assembly and development. Biol Reprod 2005; 72:241–255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Danforth DR, Arbogast LK, Ghosh S, Dickerman A, Rofagha R, Friedman CI. Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates preantral follicle growth in the rat ovary. Biol Reprod 2003; 68:1736–1741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Dakappagari NK, Pyles J, Parihar R, Carson WE, Young DC, Kaumaya PT. A chimeric multi-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 B cell epitope peptide vaccine mediates superior antitumor responses. J Immunol. 2003; 170:4242–4253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Keyt BA, Berleau LT, Nguyen HV, Chen H, Heinsohn H, Vandlen R, Ferrara N. The carboxyl-terminal domain (111–165) of vascular endothelial growth factor is critical for its mitogenic potency. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:7788–7795[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Frangione-Beebe M, Albrecht B, Dakappagari N, Rose RT, Brooks CL, Schwendeman SP, Lairmore MD, Kaumaya PT. Enhanced immunogenicity of a conformational epitope of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 using a novel chimeric peptide. Vaccine 2000; 19:1068–1081[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Nelson JF, Felicio LS, Randall PK, Sims C, Finch CE. A longitudinal study of estrous cyclicity in aging C57BL/6J mice: I. Cycle frequency, length and vaginal cytology. Biol Reprod 1982; 27:327–339[Abstract]
  33. Christofori G, Naik P, Hanahan D. Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors, flt-1 and flk-1, are expressed in normal pancreatic islets and throughout islet cell tumorigenesis. Mol Endocrinol 1995; 9:1760–1770[Abstract]
  34. McGee EA and Hsueh AJ. Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles. Endocr Rev 2000; 21:200–214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Skinner MK. Regulation of primordial follicle assembly and development. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11:461–471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Hull ML, Charnock-Jones DS, Chan CL, Bruner-Tran KL, Osteen KG, Tom BD, Fan TP, Smith SK. Antiangiogenic agents are effective inhibitors of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88:2889–2899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. The Physiology of Reproduction, vol 2, 2nd ed. vom Saal FS, Finch CE, Nelson JF. Natural history and mechanisms of reproductive aging in humans, laboratory rodents, and other selected vertebrates. 1994:New York: Raven Press;1213–1314. In:
  38. Xu F, Hazzard T, Evans A, Charnock-Jones S, Smith S, Stouffer R. Intraovarian actions of anti-angiogenic agents disrupt periovulatory events during the menstrual cycle in monkeys. Contraception 2005; 71:239–248[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Heryanto B, Lipson KE, Rogers PA. Effect of angiogenesis inhibitors on estrogen-mediated endometrial endothelial cell proliferation in the ovariectomized mouse. Reproduction 2003; 125:337–346[Abstract]
  40. Rockwell LC, Pillai S, Olson CE, Koos RD. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor action blocks estrogen-induced uterine edema and implantation in rodents. Biol Reprod 2002; 67:1804–1810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Einspanier R, Schonfelder M, Muller K, Stojkovic M, Kosmann M, Wolf E, Schams D. Expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors and effects of VEGF during in vitro maturation of bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC). Mol Reprod Dev 2002; 62:29–36[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Zimmermann RC, Xiao E, Bohlen P, Ferin M. Administration of antivascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antibody in the early follicular phase delays follicular selection and development in the rhesus monkey. Endocrinology 2002 143:2496–2502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Johnson J, Bagley J, Skaznik-Wikiel M, Lee HJ, Adams GB, Niikura Y, Tschudy KS, Tilly JC, Cortes ML, Forkert R, Spitzer T, Iacomini J, et al. Oocyte generation in adult mammalian ovaries by putative germ cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Cell 2005; 122:303–315[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Lairmore MD, DiGeorge AM, Conrad SF, Trevino AV, Lal RB, Kaumaya PT. Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 peptides in chimeric and multivalent constructs with promiscuous T-cell epitopes enhance immunogenicity and overcome genetic restriction. J Virol 1995; 69:6077–6089[Abstract]
  45. Sundaram R, Lynch MP, Rawale SV, Sun Y, Kazanji M, Kaumaya PT. De novo design of peptide immunogens that mimic the coiled coil region of human T-cell leukemia virus type-1 glycoprotein 21 transmembrane subunit for induction of native protein reactive neutralizing antibodies. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:24141–24151[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
76/2/218    most recent
biolreprod.106.050880v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Danforth, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Danforth, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Danforth, D. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS