Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print January 31, 2007.
Biol Reprod 2007, 10.1095/biolreprod.106.058065
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Supplemental Tables]
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
76/5/858    most recent
biolreprod.106.058065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herrick, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herrick, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, W. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Herrick, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, W. F.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 76, 858–870 (2007)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.058065
© 2007 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Toward a Feline-Optimized Culture Medium: Impact of Ions, Carbohydrates, Essential Amino Acids, Vitamins, and Serum on Development and Metabolism of In Vitro Fertilization-Derived Feline Embryos Relative to Embryos Grown In Vivo1

Jason R. Herrick 2 3, Jennifer B. Bond 3, Genevieve M. Magarey 3, Helen L. Bateman 3, Rebecca L. Krisher 4, Susan A. Dunford 5, and William F. Swanson 3

Center for Conservation and Research of Endangered Wildlife,3 Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220 Department of Animal Sciences,4 Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 Department of Biological Sciences,5 University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to define the physiologic needs of domestic cat embryos to facilitate development of a feline-specific culture medium. In a series of factorial experiments, in vivo-matured oocytes (n = 2040) from gonadotropin-treated domestic cats were inseminated in vitro to generate embryos (n = 1464) for culture. In the initial study, concentrations of NaCl (100.0 vs. 120.0 mM), KCl (4.0 vs. 8.0 mM), KH2PO4 (0.25 vs. 1.0 mM), and the ratio of CaCl2 to MgSO4-7H2O (1.0:2.0 mM vs. 2.0:1.0 mM) in the medium were evaluated during Days 1–6 (Day 0: oocyte recovery and in vitro fertilization [IVF]) of culture. Subsequent experiments assessed the effects of varying concentrations of carbohydrate (glucose, 1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 mM; L-lactate, 3.0, 6.0, or 12.0 mM; and pyruvate, 0.1 or 1.0 mM) and essential amino acids (EAAs; 0, 0.5, or 1.0x) in the medium during Days 1–3 and Days 3–6 of culture. Inclusion of vitamins (0 vs. 1.0x) and fetal calf serum (FCS; 0 vs. 5% [v/v]) in the medium also was evaluated during Days 3–6. Development and metabolism of IVF embryos on Day 3 or Day 6 were compared to age-matched in vivo embryos recovered from naturally mated queens. A feline-optimized culture medium (FOCM) was formulated based on these results (100.0 mM NaCl, 8.0 mM KCl, 1.0 mM KH2PO4, 2.0 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgSO4, 1.5 mM glucose, 6.0 mM L-lactate, 0.1 mM pyruvate, and 0x EAAs with 25.0 mM NaHCO3, 1.0 mM alanyl-glutamine, 0.1 mM taurine, and 1.0x nonessential amino acids) with 0.4% (w/v) BSA from Days 0–3 and 5% FCS from Days 3–6. Using this medium, ~70% of cleaved embryos developed into blastocysts with profiles of carbohydrate metabolism similar to in vivo embryos. Our results suggest that feline embryos have stage-specific responses to carbohydrates and are sensitive to EAAs but are still reliant on one or more unidentified components of FCS for optimal blastocyst development.

assisted reproductive technology, early development, embryo, in vitro fertilization

INTRODUCTION

The composition of embryo culture media can affect embryonic morphology, metabolism, and gene expression [16]. Following embryo transfer these alterations influence implantation, fetal growth, the incidence of birth defects, gestation length and, ultimately, offspring health [711]. Even as little as 6 h of culture in inappropriate conditions can affect embryo transfer success [2]. As a result, embryo physiology in laboratory rodents, domestic livestock, and humans has received considerable attention to formulate culture media that support growth of embryos with the capacity to develop into healthy offspring.

In contrast, very little is known about the physiology of the feline embryo, even though successful in vitro fertilization (IVF) [12] and blastocyst development [13] were first reported in the domestic cat more than 25 years ago. The effects of gas atmosphere [14], protein source [15, 16], culture temperature [14], oviductal co-culture [17], and energy source [18] on embryonic development have been examined, but all of these studies used basal media intended for somatic cells or the embryos of other species. Cat embryos will develop to the blastocyst stage in a wide range of media [1923], and kittens have been produced following culture in several of these media [24]. However, in vitro development to the blastocyst stage is reduced and delayed relative to in vivo embryos, and implantation and pregnancy rates are low compared with natural mating [25, 26]. Similarly, embryo transfer success is considerably lower in cats than in other species [24, 2729]. The lack of knowledge concerning feline embryo physiology and reduced viability of cultured embryos limit the usefulness of assisted reproductive technologies for the genetic management of domestic and endangered, nondomestic cat populations.

In other species, tailoring the concentrations of ions, carbohydrates, and amino acids present in the culture medium to the needs of the embryo greatly improves embryo viability [3032]. Early embryos appear to have a reduced ability to maintain ionic homeostasis, especially in the first few hours after fertilization [3]. As a result, inappropriate ionic conditions can affect gene expression, metabolic activity, and embryonic development in vitro and in vivo [3, 31]. Similarly, concentrations of carbohydrates in the medium influence the metabolic activity of the embryo, which impacts ATP production as well as the intracellular pH and redox state [33, 34]. Concentrations of carbohydrates also vary in different regions of the reproductive tract, suggesting that the carbohydrate requirements of embryos are stage specific [35, 36]. Whereas the amino acids designated as nonessential (NEAAs) for somatic cells appear to be beneficial throughout preimplantation development, essential amino acids (EAAs) exhibit concentration- and stage-specific effects on embryo development [27, 37, 38]. Given the effects these basic medium components have on embryonic physiology, it is not surprising that blastocyst development is improved in other species by culture in relatively simple media containing optimized concentrations of ions, carbohydrates, and amino acids [29, 39, 40].

A variety of approaches to culture medium formulation have been used in other species, each with their own set of advantages and disadvantages [41, 42]. The challenge common to all of these approaches is how to determine which treatment is optimal. Embryo transfer provides the best measure of embryo viability, but the large numbers of treatments involved in studies of culture medium composition make embryo transfers impractical in most species. In addition, embryo transfer success depends on the quality of the uterine environment and the quality of the embryo. Without protocols for consistent synchronization of an appropriate uterine environment, which are not available for the cat, it is difficult to evaluate embryonic viability with embryo transfers. Embryo morphology typically is used as an alternative, but viability can vary greatly among morphologically similar embryos [8]. In contrast, nutrient consumption and developmental kinetic data provide useful indicators of embryo viability when comparable data are available from in vivo-grown embryos [8, 43].

The overall goal of this study was to define the physiologic needs of preimplantation cat embryos using a novel, sequential approach to allow development of a feline-optimized culture medium (FOCM). Our specific objectives were to: 1) develop a basal medium containing optimized ion (NaCl, KCl, KH2PO4, CaCl2, and MgSO4-7H2O) concentrations for all subsequent experiments (experiment 1); 2) establish physiologic norms of embryo development and metabolism for oviductal and uterine-stage embryos grown in vivo (experiment 2); 3) assess the effects of carbohydrates (glucose, L-lactate, and pyruvate) and EAAs on embryo physiology during Days 1– 3 (experiments 3 and 4) and Days 3–6 (experiments 5 and 6) following IVF (Day 0); and 4) evaluate the impact of vitamins [2, 44] and serum during Days 3–6 of culture (experiment 7).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and Media Preparation

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) unless specified otherwise. Stock solutions were prepared in 18.2 M{Omega} water and stored at 4°C for either 1 wk (pyruvate, glutamine, bicarbonate) or 1 mo (basal salt solution, glucose, L-lactate [ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa, CA], taurine). Aliquots of an alanyl-glutamine stock solution were stored at –80°C and used within 1 mo of thawing [45]. Stock solutions of gentamicin, amino acids (minimal essential medium concentrations; ICN Biomedicals), vitamins (minimal essential medium concentrations; ICN Biomedicals), and fetal calf serum (FCS; Hyclone, Logan, UT) were stored according to supplier instructions and were used directly for medium preparation. All media contained 4.0 mg/ml BSA (Crystalized, true Cohn BSA 81-001-3; Serologicals Proteins, Inc., Kankakee, IL) unless otherwise specified. Working solutions of all media were prepared for each replicate, filtered (0.22 µm; MillexGV; Millipore, Billerica, MA), and equilibrated in the appropriate gas atmosphere. Cumulus-oocyte complexes or embryos were cultured in 50-µl drops of medium (~8–12 per drop) covered with 10 ml embryo-tested mineral oil in 10 x 60 mm plastic dishes (Falcon 1007; Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and were maintained at 38.7°C with 6% CO2.

Oocyte Recovery

All animal procedures were approved by the Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Group-housed, anestrual queens (ages 1–8 yr; Liberty Research Inc., Waverly, NY) with basal serum progesterone concentrations (≤1 to 2 ng/ml; Target Rapid Feline Progesterone Kit; Biometallics, Princeton, NJ) were treated i.m. with 150 IU eCG (Sioux Biochemical Inc., Sioux Center, IA; or Sigma Chemical Co.) followed 84–86 h later with 100 IU hCG (Sioux Biochemical Inc. or Sigma Chemical Co.). At 24–27 h after hCG, females were anesthetized and subjected to laparoscopic follicle aspiration [26]. Mature follicles (≥2 mm) were aspirated with a 22-gauge needle attached to a foot pedal-operated vacuum pump (~1.5 mm Hg) into HEPES-buffered FOCM (FOCMH, Fraction V BSA A-3311 [Sigma Chemical Co.]; Table 1) containing 40 U/ml heparin (Elkins-Sinn Inc., Cherry Hill, NJ). Mature cumulus-oocyte complexes were washed twice in FOCMH without heparin, three times in the appropriate fertilization medium for each experiment (Table 1), placed into 45-µl drops of fertilization medium, and maintained at 38.7°C in 6% CO2 in air until insemination.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
TABLE 1. Composition of feline optimized culture medium (FOCM) for each experiment.*

Semen Collection and IVF

Semen from one of the two males used for natural breeding was collected for each replicate using an artificial vagina. Males were alternated from replicate to replicate. Recovered semen was diluted 1:4 with FOCMH and centrifuged for 10 min at 600 x g, and the pellet was resuspended in 50–100 µl FOCMH. After determining sperm concentration and motility, aliquots were diluted in fertilization medium (Table 1) to 2 x 106 motile spermatozoa per milliliter. Aliquots (5 µl) then were added to insemination drops containing cumulus-oocyte complexes for a final volume of 50 µl containing 2 x 105 motile spermatozoa per milliliter. Gametes were coincubated for 18–22 h. In experiment 1, IVF was performed in 2.0 ml medium in a 2.0-ml cryovial (Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY) containing the same sperm concentration. After re-equilibration of the medium after insemination, vials were sealed and transported (~3 h) in a portable incubator to another laboratory. Vials then were incubated at 38.7°C in 6% CO2 in air without lids throughout the fertilization period.

Embryo Culture

At 18–22 h after insemination, presumptive zygotes were placed into 100 µl FOCMH containing 80–160 U/ml hylauronidase in a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube. Loosely bound spermatozoa and remaining cumulus cells were removed by vortexing for 2–3 min. Denuded zygotes were washed twice in FOCMH and either randomly allocated to treatments (experiments 1, 3, and 4) or placed in FOCM IVC1 (experiments 5–7). All subsequent cultures (Days 1–6) were performed in an atmosphere of 6% CO2, 5% O2, and 89% N2. On Day 3, cleavage was evaluated and embryos were either transferred into fresh medium (experiment 1) and cultured until Day 6, evaluated for metabolic activity and stained for total cell number (experiments 3 and 4), or allocated to treatments and cultured until Day 6 (experiments 5–7). On Day 6, blastocyst development and metabolism (experiments 5–7) were evaluated, and all embryos were stained to determine total cell number (experiments 1 and 5–7) [46, 47]. Only embryos containing ≥30 cells with a visible blastocoel cavity were considered blastocysts.

In Vivo Embryo Recovery (Experiment 2)

Group-housed female domestic cats (n = 20, ages 1–7 yr) were naturally bred with one of two male domestic cats three times per day for 2 days beginning on the second to fifth day of behavioral estrus [25]. On Day 4 or 7 after the first mating, or approximately 3 or 6 days after presumed ovulation and fertilization [25], mated queens were ovariohysterectomized. Oviducts and uterine horns were separated and flushed with FOCMH to recover cleavage-stage embryos (Day 3) or blastocysts (Day 6). Within 1 h of collection, metabolic activity and total cell number were determined.

Embryo Metabolism

Embryos were washed once in FOCMH, twice in 50-µl drops of metabolism medium, and held in a third drop of metabolism medium until assayed (<1 h after removal from culture). The medium used in experiment 3, including 1.5 mM unlabeled glucose, 3.0 mM L-lactate, and 0.1 mM unlabelled pyruvate, was used for all metabolic assessments. Metabolism of glucose via glycolysis and pyruvate oxidation through the tricarboxylic acid cycle was simultaneously measured using 5-3H-glucose (0.0125 mM, 0.25 µCi/µl; Perkin-Elmer NEN Life Sciences Inc., Boston, MA) and 2-14C-pyruvate (0.276 mM, 0.0014 µCi/µl; American Radiolabeled Chemicals Inc., St. Louis, MO). Assays were performed at 38.7°C in 6% CO2, 5%O2, and 89% N2 as described by Herrick et al. [47].

Design of Culture Experiments

Zygotes (experiments 1, 3, and 4) or embryos (experiments 5–7) from each replicate were divided among as many treatments as possible (incomplete block design) so that each treatment contained an equivalent number of embryos (7–12 per treatment per replicate). All treatments were used once before any were replicated. All treatments were replicated two (experiment 1 only) or three times so that each treatment group had a total of approximately 20–30 embryos.

In experiment 1, the effects of NaCl (100.0 or 120.0 mM), KCl (4.0 or 8.0 mM), and KH2PO4 (0.25 or 1.0 mM) concentrations and two CaCl2:MgSO4-7H2O ratios (1.0:2.0 mM or 2.0:1.0 mM [3, 31]; Table 1) in the medium were evaluated. The osmolarity of the media was not kept constant, so the effects of NaCl on embryonic development cannot be differentiated from osmotic effects (100 mM NaCl, 255.3 ± 1.1 mOsm; 120 mM NaCl, 292.3 ± 1.4 mOsm). Zygotes were allocated to treatments on Day 1, cleavage was evaluated on Day 3 after transfer to fresh medium, and all embryos were cultured until Day 6, when blastocyst development and total cell numbers were evaluated.

In experiment 3, the effects of glucose (1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 mM), L-lactate (3.0, 6.0, or 12.0 mM) [48, 49], and pyruvate (0.1 or 1.0 mM) were evaluated during Days 1–3 in the optimal medium from experiment 1 (Table 1). The final, equilibrated pH of media with different lactate concentrations was maintained at 7.3 ± 0.1 by adding 1.0 M NaOH to the medium before equilibration. In experiment 4, embryos were cultured from Days 1–3 in the optimal medium from experiment 3 containing 0, 0.5, or 1.0x the concentrations of EAAs (Table 1). Because the inhibitory effects of EAAs are attributed to their spontaneous breakdown to NH4, alanyl-glutamine was used instead of glutamine in experiment 3 to reduce NH4 produced from sources other than the EAAs [45, 50, 51]. In experiments 3 and 4, embryo cleavage, total cell numbers, and metabolic activity (picomoles of substrate per embryo or cell per 3 h) were assessed on Day 3 and compared among treatments and to in vivo embryos recovered 3 days after ovulation. The final medium resulting from experiments 1, 3, and 4 (Table 1) was designated FOCM IVF (includes 50 µg/ml gentamicin) and FOCM IVC1 (in vitro culture Days 1–3) and was used throughout the remainder of the study.

For experiment 5, the same carbohydrate treatments used in experiment 3 were tested during Days 3–6 (Table 1). Due to the beneficial effects of culturing with higher-quality embryos [52], only cleaved embryos were selected and randomly allocated to treatments on Day 3. In experiment 6, the effects of 0, 0.5, and 1.0x EAAs were evaluated in the best two treatments from experiment 5 (Table 1). Again, alanyl-glutamine was used in place of glutamine to reduce background concentrations of NH4. In experiment 7, Day 3 embryos were randomly allocated to one of three media: 1) the optimal medium from experiment 6; 2) the optimal medium from experiment 6 with 1x vitamins [2, 44]; or 3) the optimal medium from experiment 6 with 5% (v/v) FCS instead of BSA (Table 1). In experiments 5–7, total cell numbers of all embryos and blastocyst metabolism (picomoles of substrate per embryo or cell per 3 h) were evaluated on Day 6 and compared between treatments and to in vivo embryos recovered 6 days after ovulation. The ratio of the amounts (picomoles) of pyruvate oxidized to glucose metabolized through glycolysis was also calculated for each embryo. This ratio provides an overall measure of metabolic activity that is independent of both cell number and cell volume, providing a better basis of comparison between embryos with greatly different cell counts. The optimal medium at the conclusion of experiment 7 is designated FOCM IVC2 (In Vitro Culture Days 3–6).

Statistical Analysis

All comparisons were made by analysis of variance in the PROC MIXED procedure of the SAS System [53]. For all endpoints, each treatment (e.g., NaCl, glucose, vitamins, etc.) and any interactions of those treatments (e.g., NaCl*KCl*KH2PO4*CaCl2:MgSO4, glucose*lactate, etc.) were considered fixed factors. Replicate (all endpoints) and the interaction between replicate and the treatments (e.g., replicate* NaCl*KCl*KH2PO4*CaCl2:MgSO4; cell number and metabolic activity) were considered random factors. For comparison of in vitro embryos to age-matched embryos grown in vivo, treatment was the only fixed factor, and there were no random factors, since replicates for the in vitro experiments were different from replicates for the in vivo experiments.

In experiment 1, the proportion of cultured zygotes that cleaved, the proportions of cleaved embryos containing at least 30, 50, or 70 cells, and the proportion of cleaved embryos developing to the blastocyst stage on Day 6 were calculated for each treatment in each replicate. In experiments 5, 6, and 7, development to each stage was based on the proportion of embryos with nine or more cells. If the embryos contained fewer than nine cells on Day 6 (1 standard deviation below the mean of Day 3), development most likely stopped prior to application of the treatments. Proportional data were transformed (arcsine of the square root of the proportion) prior to analysis.

Metabolic data (picomoles of substrate per embryo or cell per 3 h or picomoles pyruvate oxidized/picomoles glucose metabolized) were analyzed in a similar manner as developmental data, except that transformation was unnecessary. On Day 3, embryos containing fewer than nine cells were considered to be developing abnormally, so metabolic data from these embryos were excluded. Similarly, only data from in vivo embryos with nine or more cells were used for in vivo versus in vitro comparisons.

Cell count data were analyzed using the generalized mixed model (GLIMMIX) macro in PROC MIXED of SAS. A log link function was used, and the error was designated as having a Poissson distribution [53]. For Day 6 embryos, cell numbers of all embryos containing nine or more cells, including blastocysts, were included in the analysis.

For all analyses, an F-test using the ratio of the largest and smallest variances was used to determine homogeneity of variance [54]. When this test was significant (P < 0.2), a separate variance for each treatment was used in the ANOVA. Fisher least significant difference test was used for pairwise comparisons of treatments when the ANOVA indicated a significant (P ≤ 0.05) effect or statistical trend (0.05 < P ≤ 0.10) for each factor (e.g., glucose) or interaction of factors (glucose*lactate). To avoid error associated with multiple comparisons, individual treatments were not compared in experiments 3 or 5 when the glucose*lactate*pyruvate effect was significant. For the analyses of in vivo and in vitro-produced embryos, only comparisons between in vivo embryos and individual treatments were used. Finally, in experiments 4–7, some treatments were pooled when the initial analysis revealed that they were not significantly different. Probability values ≤0.05 were considered significant, and values 0.05 < P ≤ 0.1 were considered to indicate a statistical trend. All values are reported as mean ± SEM.

RESULTS

Experiment 1: Ions (Days 1–6)

A total of 348 zygotes were cultured in the 16 treatments, resulting in 174 embryos (two or more cells). Cleavage rates were higher (P = 0.03) with 100 mM than with 120 mM NaCl (Table 2). In addition, there was a trend (P = 0.08) toward higher cleavage rates when zygotes were cultured in 1.0 mM instead of 0.25 mM KH2PO4 (Table 2). Total cell numbers on Day 6 and the proportion of embryos with ≥30 cells were not affected (P > 0.10) by treatments (Table 2). However, the proportion of embryos with >50 cells on Day 6 tended (P = 0.10) to be higher in 8.0 mM than in 4.0 mM KCl (Table 2). The proportions of embryos with ≥70 cells also was higher (P = 0.01) when zygotes were cultured in 100 mM NaCl and 1.0 mM KH2PO4 (Table 2). In addition, there was a trend (P = 0.06) for the NaCl*KCl*KH2PO4*CaCl2:MgSO4 interaction to affect the proportion of embryos with ≥70 cells, and 100.0 mM NaCl, 8.0 mM KCl, 1.0 mM KH2PO4, and 2.0:1.0 mM CaCl2:MgSO4 was numerically (11.3%) the best treatment (Table 2; Supplemental Table 1 available online at www.biolreprod.org). The proportion of blastocysts on Day 6 was low (3.4% overall) and was not affected (P > 0.10) by treatment (Supplemental Table 1). No embryos in any treatment contained ≥100 cells on Day 6.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
TABLE 2. Effects of NaCl, KCl, and KH2PO4 concentrations and the CaCl2:MgSO4-7H2O during Days 0–6 on the development of feline embryos on Day 6 of culture (Day 0 = IVF).

Experiment 2: In Vivo Embryo Recovery on Day 3 or 6 Postovulation

A total of 14 (70%) of 20 mated females ovulated using the described mating regimen (Table 3). Ovulating females had 4.6 ± 0.2 (range: 3–6) corpora lutea at the time of ovariohysterectomy (Table 3). Overall embryo recovery rate (based on the number of corpora lutea) was 83.6% ± 7.4%, but this was influenced by embryo quality. Six ovulating females (42.9%) produced only degenerate embryos, and seven ovulating females (50%) produced only good-quality embryos (uniformly pigmented, symmetrical blastomeres). The recovery rate for females producing at least one good-quality embryo was 95.0% ± 3.3% (Table 3). On Day 3, embryos (n = 18 from four females) contained 15.5 ± 2.0 cells, with a range of 2–32 cells per embryo (Table 3). Among the embryos from a single female, the average difference between the largest and smallest embryo was 15.1 ± 1.4 cells. Day 3 embryos metabolized 0.75 ± 0.09 pmol glucose and 0.37 ± 0.11 pmol pyurvate per embryo per 3 h or 0.049 ± 0.008 pmol glucose and 0.025 ± 0.007 pmol pyruvate per cell per 3 h. On Day 6, all recovered embryos (n = 17 from four females) were at the blastocyst stage and contained 330.0 ± 31.3 cells (range: 102–576 cells per embryo; Table 3). From a single female, cell numbers between the largest and smallest embryos differed by 167.5 ± 24.3 cells. In vivo blastocysts metabolized 9.46 ± 1.21 pmol glucose and 1.80 ± 0.24 pmol pyruvate per embryo per 3 h or 0.029 ± 0.004 pmol glucose and 0.006 ± 0.001 pmol pyruvate per cell per 3 h.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
TABLE 3. Summary of ovulatory responses and embryo recovery (mean ± SEM) following natural breeding.

Experiment 3: Carbohydrates (Days 1–3)

From 547 zygotes placed into culture, a total of 403 embryos (2 or more cells) developed in the 18 treatment groups. Cleavage rate was not affected (P > 0.10) by treatment (data not shown). The mean final cell number of all embryos on Day 3 (18.8 ± 0.5 overall) was affected (P = 0.02) by an interaction between glucose, lactate, and pyruvate, and there was a trend (P = 0.07) toward an interaction between lactate and pyruvate. Cell numbers were not different (P > 0.10) from in vivo embryos (15.5 ± 2.0 cells) in 12 treatments (Supplemental Table 2, available online at www.biolreprod.org). In the remaining six treatments, cell numbers were greater (P ≤ 0.05, five treatments; 0.05 < P ≤ 0.1, one treatment) than those of in vivo embryos (Supplemental Table 2).

Of the cultured embryos, 333 (82.6%) had nine or more cells on Day 3, and 326 of those were used for metabolic comparisons (Supplemental Table 2). Glycolytic activity per embryo was affected (P = 0.04) by lactate, and rates were higher after culture in 3.0 or 6.0 mM than they were in 12.0 mM. The interaction between glucose and lactate also affected (P = 0.02) glycolytic rate per embryo, with 3.0 mM glucose and 3.0 mM lactate and 6.0 mM glucose and 6.0 mM lactate producing the highest rates. The glucose, lactate, and pyruvate interaction tended (P = 0.09) to affect glycolytic activity expressed per cell. None of the other tested factors affected (P > 0.10) glycolytic activity per cell. Similarly, pyruvate metabolism per embryo and per cell were not affected (P > 0.10) by any of the tested factors. When compared to in vivo-grown embryos, glycolytic activity per embryo was not different (P > 0.10) in 13 treatments (Supplemental Table 2). In 16 treatments, glycolytic activity per cell also was not different (P > 0.10) from in vivo embryos (Supplemental Table 2). In contrast, only six and eight treatments produced embryos with rates of pyruvate activity per embryo or per cell, respectively, that were not different (P > 0.10) from in vivo embryos (Supplemental Table 2).

Overall, only six treatments did not differ (P > 0.10) from in vivo embryos for all four metabolic endpoints (Supplemental Table 2). Of these six, only two (1.5 mM glucose, 6.0 mM lactate, and 0.1 mM pyruvate; and 1.5 mM glucose, 12.0 mM lactate, and 1.0 mM pyruvate) also contained more (P ≤ 0.05) cells than in vivo embryos (Supplemental Table 2). Since cell numbers in vivo were affected by different times of ovulation relative to embryo recovery, in vitro treatments resulting in embryos with higher cell numbers were considered optimal and not indicative of abnormally accelerated growth rates. Metabolic activity of embryos cultured in 1.5 mM glucose, 6.0 mM lactate, and 0.1 mM pyruvate were numerically closer to in vivo embryos, so this combination was used in all subsequent experiments for IVF and culture from Days 1–3 (Supplemental Table 2).

Experiment 4: Essential Amino Acids (Days 1–3)

From 185 zygotes, 140 embryos (2 or more cells) were cultured in this experiment. There was no difference (P > 0.10) between 0.5 and 1.0x EAAs for any of the endpoints (data not shown), so these treatments were pooled for comparison to embryos cultured in the absence of EAAs and to embryos grown in vivo (Table 4). The addition of EAAs decreased (P ≤ 0.05) the proportion of embryos that cleaved (69.6% ± 5.6%) compared with embryos cultured without EAAs (89.0% ± 3.6%; Table 4). However, the total cell number of embryos on Day 3 was not affected (P > 0.10) by the presence of EAAs, and both in vitro-produced treatment groups (with and without EAAs) were not different (P > 0.10) from in vivo-grown embryos (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
TABLE 4. Effects of the concentrations of EAA (1.0x = MEM) during Days 1–3 on development and metabolism of feline embryos on Day 3 of culture (Day 0 = IVF).

For metabolic analysis, 116 embryos (82.9%) containing nine or more cells were used. The presence of EAAs did not affect (P > 0.10) the rates of glycolysis or pyruvate oxidation on a per embryo or per cell basis (Table 4). Although glycolytic activity per embryo was higher (P ≤ 0.05) for in vitro embryos than in vivo-grown embryos, glycolytic activity per cell was not different (P > 0.10; Table 4). Pyruvate oxidations per embryo and per cell were higher (P ≤ 0.05) in the in vitro-produced embryos than in those produced in vivo (Table 4). Due to the inhibitory effects of EAAs on cleavage rates, IVF and culture from Days 1–3 were performed without EAAs in subsequent experiments.

Experiment 5: Carbohydrates (Days 3–6)

A total of 624 zygotes were cultured from Days 1–3, resulting in 478 embryos. Of these embryos, 450 (94.1%) contained 9 or more cells and were used for analysis. Overall, embryos contained 53.6 ± 1.1 cells on Day 6, with 85.1% having ≥30 cells, 54.9% having ≥50 cells, 22.0% having ≥70 cells, and 4.2% having ≥100 cells (Supplemental Table 3, available online at www.biolreprod.org). There was a trend (P = 0.10) toward higher cell numbers following culture in 0.1 mM pyruvate than in 1.0 mM, but no other factors affected final cell number. The proportion of embryos with ≥70 cells also was higher (P = 0.03) after culture in 0.1 mM pyruvate than in 1.0 mM. In addition, more (P = 0.01) embryos contained ≥100 cells after culture in 1.5 mM glucose and 6.0 mM lactate than embryos cultured in all other glucose and lactate combinations except 3.0 mM glucose and 3.0 mM lactate (P > 0.10) or 6.0 mM glucose and 3.0 mM lactate (P = 0.06). Overall, 24.9% of embryos developed to the blastocyst stage, and these blastocysts contained 68.1 ± 2.0 cells (Supplemental Table 3). The proportion of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage was not affected (P > 0.05) by any of the carbohydrates, but blastocyst cell number tended (P = 0.10) to be higher after culture with 0.1 mM pyruvate than it did with 1.0 mM. Blastocyst cell number also was affected (P = 0.01) by an interaction between glucose and pyruvate, with 1.5 mM glucose and 0.1 mM pyruvate being the best treatment numerically.

Although the proportion of in vitro embryos containing ≥30 cells (85.1%) on Day 6 was not different (P > 0.10) from in vivo-grown embryos (100.0%), the proportions of in vitro embryos with ≥50 cells (54.9%; 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10), ≥70 cells (22.0%), ≥100 cells (4.2%), or at the blastocyst stage (24.9%) were all reduced (P ≤ 0.05) relative to in vivo-grown embryos (100.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 100.0%, respectively; Supplemental Table 3). Blastocyst cell numbers (68.1 ± 2.0) also were lower (P ≤ 0.05) in all treatments compared with in vivo-derived blastocysts (330.0 ± 31.3; Supplemental Table 3). Numerically, the most blastocysts (43.7% ± 15.4%) were produced in 3.0 mM glucose, 3.0 mM lactate, and 0.1 mM pyruvate, but blastocyst cell numbers were highest (114.3 ± 4.8) after culture in 1.5 mM glucose, 6.0 mM lactate, and 0.1 mM pyruvate (Supplemental Table 3).

A total of 80 blastocysts were used for metabolic analysis (Supplemental Table 4, available online at www.biolreprod.org). Glucose tended to affect glycolytic activity on both a per embryo (P = 0.07) and a per cell (P = 0.06) basis. In both cases, glycolysis was more active after culture in 1.5 mM glucose than in 6.0 mM glucose. Lactate also affected rates of glycolysis on both a per embryo (P = 0.03) and per cell (P = 0.08) basis, with higher concentrations of lactate stimulating glycolytic activity. Glycolysis per embryo also was affected (P = 0.04) by an interaction between glucose, lactate, and pyruvate. In addition, pyruvate affected (P = 0.04) glycolytic activity per cell, with more glucose metabolized following exposure to 1.0 mM pyruvate compared with 0.1 mM. The rate of pyruvate oxidation per cell tended (P = 0.06) to be affected by an interaction between glucose and lactate, with 3.0 mM glucose and 6.0 mM lactate producing higher metabolic rates than all other treatments except 6.0 mM glucose and 12.0 mM lactate. Pyruvate oxidation per embryo and the ratio of the amount of pyruvate oxidized to the amount of glucose metabolized through glycolysis were not altered by the carbohydrate composition of the medium.

None of the treatments resulted in blastocysts with glycolytic activity per embryo similar to blastocysts grown in vivo (Supplemental Table 4). Similarly, only two treatments resulted in levels of pyruvate oxidation per embryo that were not different (P > 0.10) from in vivo blastocysts (Supplemental Table 4). However, 10 and 16 treatments produced blastocysts with rates of glycolysis and pyruvate oxidation per cell, respectively, that were not different (P > 0.10) from in vivo blastocysts (Supplemental Table 4). All treatments resulted in blastocysts with ratios of pyruvate oxidized to glucose metabolized through glycolysis (overall: 0.19 ± 0.03, n = 80) that were not different (P > 0.10) from in vivo embryos (0.21 ± 0.02, n = 17; Supplemental Table 4). In addition, when the ratios of oxidized pyruvate to glucose metabolized through glycolysis were pooled across in vitro treatments (no significant effect of any individual carbohydrate or interaction between carbohydrates on this parameter; Supplemental Table 4), there was no difference (P > 0.10) between in vitro- and in vivo-grown embryos. There were 10 treatments whose metabolic activity per cell and the ratio of pyruvate to glucose metabolized were all similar (P > 0.10) to in vivo blastocysts (Supplemental Table 4). One of these 10 treatments resulted in the most blastocysts (3.0 mM glucose, 3.0 mM lactate, and 0.1 mM pyruvate), and another resulted in blastocysts with the most cells (1.5 mM glucose, 6.0 mM lactate, and 0.1 mM pyruvate; Supplemental Table 4). Since both blastocyst quantity (frequency) and quality (cell number and metabolism) are important, both of these treatments were used in experiment 3b.

Experiment 6: Essential Amino Acids (Days 3–6)

From 226 cultured zygotes, 180 embryos were allocated to the six treatments, resulting in 161 embryos (89.4%) with 9 or more cells on Day 6 for comparisons. Although carbohydrate treatments did not affect (P > 0.10) any of the developmental endpoints, there was a significant (P = 0.004) interaction between EAA concentration and carbohydrate combination in the proportion of embryos with ≥50 cells (data not shown). Therefore, data could not be pooled to examine the effects of culturing embryos with (0.5x and 1.0x EAAs combined) and without EAAs. Both 0.5x and 1.0x EAAs significantly (P ≤ 0.05) inhibited final cell number and the proportions of embryos with ≥30 cells, ≥50 cells, or ≥70 cells (Table 5). The proportion of embryos containing ≥100 cells, the proportion of embryos at the blastocyst stage, and the number of cells per blastocyst were not affected (P > 0.10) by the presence of EAAs (Table 5). All treatments were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) from in vivo embryos for all endpoints, except (P = 0.052) the proportion of embryos (88.1% ± 8.6%) with ≥30 cells after culture in 1.5 mM glucose, 6.0 mM lactate, and 0.1 mM pyruvate and 0x EAAs (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
TABLE 5. Main effects of carbohydrate and EAA (1.0x = MEM) concentrations during Days 3–6 on development of feline embryos on Day 6 of culture (Day 0 = IVF).

Unlike developmental data, blastocyst metabolism data could be pooled to examine the effects of culturing embryos with (0.5x and 1.0x EAAs; data not shown) and without EAAs (Table 6). The EAAs did not affect (P > 0.10) any of the metabolic endpoints evaluated, but there was trend (P = 0.06) toward a difference between pyruvate oxidation per cell (0.009 ± 0.003 without EAAs vs. 0.002 ± 0.001 with EAAs; Table 6). When compared to in vivo blastocysts, in vitro blastocysts from both groups had different (P ≤ 0.05) rates of metabolism per embryo (Table 6). In contrast, glycolytic activity per cell, pyruvate oxidation per cell, and the ratio of pyruvate to glucose metabolized were not different (P > 0.10) between in vivo blastocysts and blastocysts cultured in the absence of EAAs (Table 6). Culturing embryos with EAAs altered (P ≤ 0.05) both glycolysis and pyruvate oxidation per cell, as well as the ratio of pyruvate to glucose metabolized, in resulting blastocysts relative to in vivo blastocysts (Table 6). For subsequent experiments, no EAAs were used in FOCM during Days 3–6. Although there were no significant differences between the two tested carbohydrate treatments in either experiments 5 or 6, 1.5 mM glucose, 6.0 mM lactate, and 0.1 mM pyruvate was selected based on blastocyst cell numbers in experiment 5.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
TABLE 6. Pooled effects of EAA during Days 3–6 on blastoycst metabolism on Day 6 (Day 0 = IVF) of culture.

Experiment 7: Vitamins and FCS (Days 3–6)

In the final experiment, 110 zygotes resulted in 89 embryos, and 86 (96.6%) of these had nine or more cells and were used for analysis. Supplementation of the medium with vitamins for Days 3–6 did not affect (P > 0.10) any developmental or metabolic endpoint (Table 7). Therefore, data from embryos cultured in the presence of BSA (with or without vitamins; data not shown) were pooled for comparison to embryos cultured in medium with FCS instead of BSA. Final cell numbers on Day 6 were increased (P ≤ 0.05) following culture with FCS (106.6 ± 9.0) compared with embryos cultured with BSA (54.5 ± 3.3; Table 7). Although the proportion of embryos with ≥30 cells was not different (P > 0.10) between groups, the proportions of embryos with ≥50 cells, ≥70 cells, ≥100 cells, and at the blastocyst stage were all higher (P ≤ 0.05) after culture with FCS (Table 7; Fig. 1). Similarly, blastocyst cell numbers tended to be higher (P = 0.053) after culture with FCS (121.0 ± 8.8) than culture with BSA (73.3 ± 11.2; Table 7; Fig. 1). Despite the improved development when serum was added to the culture medium, both in vitro treatments differed (P ≤ 0.05) from in vivo-grown embryos for all developmental endpoints (Table 7).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
TABLE 7. Effects of FCS (5% v/v) during Days 3–6 on development of feline embryos on Day 6 of culture (Day 0 = IVF).


Figure 01
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 1. Two feline blastocysts on Day 6 after insemination that were cultured in FOCM with 5% (v/v) FCS from Days 3–6. A) Hoffman Modulation Contrast optics. B) Stained with Hoechst 33342 for cell number determination (186 cells). Bar = 25 µm.

There were no differences (P > 0.10) between the metabolism of blastocysts cultured in BSA and those cultured in FCS for any metabolic endpoint (Table 8). Metabolic activity per embryo of in vitro-produced blastocysts was different (P ≤ 0.05) from in vivo blastocysts for both glycolysis and pyruvate oxidation (Table 8). However, when the metabolic activities of each pathway were expressed per cell, there were no differences (P > 0.05) between in vitro- and in vivo-grown blastocysts (Table 8). In addition, the ratio of pyruvate to glucose metabolized also was similar (P > 0.10) between in vitro and in vivo blastocysts (Table 8).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
TABLE 8. Effects of FCS (5% v/v) during Days 3–6 on metabolism of feline blastocysts on Day 6 of culture (Day 0 = IVF).

DISCUSSION

The primary objective of this series of experiments was to critically investigate the physiology of domestic cat embryos in order to develop an embryo culture medium that would better support the viability of feline embryos during culture. Using a systematic, multifactorial approach to assess the effects of varying concentrations of several medium components on embryo development and metabolism, we have shown that in vivo- and in vitro-generated feline embryos exhibit unique physiologic properties relative to embryos from other mammalian species. Our findings also facilitated formulation of a culture medium that supports development of 70% of cultured embryos to the blastocyst stage within a normal, or "in vivo-like," timeframe. In addition, these embryos exhibited similar profiles of carbohydrate metabolism to that of in vivo embryos on both Day 3 and Day 6 of culture. Although the ability of these embryos to produce healthy offspring was not evaluated in this study, improved development in vitro and an enhanced understanding of the physiology of feline embryos provides important information for further development of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer technologies for felids.

Since ovarian tissue from domestic cats is readily available from most veterinary clinics following the surgical sterilization of pets, most studies of feline embryo culture have used in vitro-matured oocytes. However, the developmental competence of in vivo-matured oocytes is better than oocytes matured in vitro, and in vivo-matured oocytes can be repeatedly collected from the same female rather than a single oocyte harvest after ovariohysterectomy or postmortem [22]. Therefore, the use of in vivo-matured oocytes is more applicable to the genetic management of domestic and nondomestic cat populations, and in vivo-matured oocytes were used throughout this study. In vitro development following IVF of feline oocytes matured in vivo differs greatly between laboratories using a variety of culture media [19, 20, 26]. No blastocysts were produced following culture for up to 10 days in Ham F-10 medium (contains 126.7 mM NaCl, 3.8 mM KCl, 6.1 mM glucose, 0.0 mM lactate, 1.1 mM pyruvate, and 2.0 mM glutamine) supplemented with 5% FCS [26]. However, if the volume of the culture drops is reduced (~10 embryos in 20 vs. 100 µl) and embryos are moved to fresh medium at 48-h intervals, Ham F-10 medium with 5% FCS can support up to 50% of embryos derived from high-quality in vitro-matured oocytes in development to the blastocyst stage [52]. This discrepancy suggests embryo-derived growth factors and the concentration of ammonium in the medium are important determinants of embryonic development in this medium [40, 52]. A sequential culture system using Tyrode salt solution as the basal medium (contains 137.0 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 5.6 mM glucose, 2.2 mM lactate, 0.36 pyruvate, and 1.0 mM glutamine) also has been used to culture feline embryos [20]. Supplementation of this medium with 10% FCS from Days 4–7 after IVF allows ~50% of embryos to develop into blastocysts with ~75–450 cells on Day 7 [20]. Blastocyst development in either Ham F-10 or the Tyrode-based medium appears to be reduced and delayed (~50% of cleaved embryos on Day 7 after IVF) relative to blastocyst development achieved in FOCM (~70% of cleaved embryos on Day 6 after IVF). To our knowledge there has only been one other report of feline blastocyst development within 6 days of IVF using in vivo-matured oocytes [19]. Using a modified version of Earle balanced salt solution, designated MK-1 (contains 116.4 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.0 mM glucose, 3.6 mM lactate, 0.36 pyruvate, and 2.0 mM [assumed from MEM, but not stated] glutamine) supplemented with 10% human serum, Kanda et al. [19] reported 71.7% of cleaved embryos developing into blastocysts with ~170 cells on Day 6 after IVF. However, Kanda et al. [19] included human serum throughout the culture period, and cumulus cells remained attached to the embryos until at least the morula stage. The presence of cumulus cells at this time is abnormal, since embryos recovered at the 16-cell stage following in vivo development did not have any cumulus cells attached (data not shown). In addition, cumulus cells exhibit high metabolic activity [47], which can alter the concentrations of nutrients available to the embryo. Although Kanda et al. [19] demonstrated excellent viability of these embryos following embryo transfer, it remains unclear how embryonic development and viability were affected by cumulus cell coculture.

The ionic composition of culture media has dramatic effects on early embryos, including altered gene expression, reduced ability to maintain homeostasis, abnormal metabolic activity, and impaired embryonic development in vitro and in vivo [31, 5557]. As in other species [5861], development of feline embryos was improved in a reduced concentration of NaCl. Although the inhibitory effects of elevated NaCl can often be alleviated by including glutamine, taurine, and the NEAAs in the medium, these amino acids failed to protect feline embryos [58, 61, 62]. Possibly the feline embryo has a reduced ability to use these amino acids as osmolytes and/or an increased sensitivity to NaCl or medium osmolarity. Another interesting finding was the beneficial effects of an elevated concentration of phosphate. In some species, phosphate is omitted from the medium used for early cleavage-stage embryos to prevent inhibitory effects on embryo metabolism [31, 63]. Hamster embryos are especially sensitive to phosphate, with concentrations as low as 2.5 µM affecting mitochondrial organization, metabolism, and embryonic development [57]. Early hamster embryos also have a reduced ability to maintain intracellular Ca2+ concentrations during culture, making them particularly sensitive to the ratio of Ca2+ to Mg2+ in the medium [3, 31]. Feline embryo development was not affected by the two Ca2+:Mg2+ ratios tested, again illustrating the difference between feline embryos and those of other species. The results of this study indicate that the feline embryo manages ionic homeostasis differently than embryos from other species, especially rodent embryos. Determination of the specific mechanisms controlling regulation of intracellular osmolarity and the role of extracellular phosphate await further research.

Although our primary objective for collecting in vivo-grown embryos was to establish normative values for cell numbers and metabolic activity, this experiment also provided valuable information on feline embryonic development in vivo. In the first 3 days of development after fertilization, feline embryos underwent approximately four cell divisions resulting in ~16 cells, similar to what has been reported based on morphology [25]. Feline embryos underwent another four to five cell divisions from Days 3–6, indicating a slight acceleration in growth rate. In contrast, previous reports based on gross morphology suggested that growth rates after the five- to eight-cell stage slowed to one division per day [25, 26]. Our data also revealed a large range in development among embryos of the same litter. On Day 3, cell number per embryo varied by ~15 cells within individual females. On Day 6, this range increased to ~168 cells. Swanson et al. [25] reported that ~30% of ovulated oocytes fail to implant. In pigs, early embryonic loss is correlated with the relative time of ovulation and fertilization for each oocyte within the litter, resulting in two cohorts of embryos at different stages of growth with variable developmental potentials [64]. A similar phenomenon may be occurring in cats, but inherent differences in embryo quality cannot be ruled out.

In vivo-derived embryos also were subjected to metabolic assessments, representing the first report of metabolism by carnivore embryos. Based on the amount of pyruvate oxidized (14CO2 from 2-14C-pyruvate) relative to glucose metabolized through glycolysis (3H2O from 5-3H-glucose; picomoles pyruvate:picomoles glucose), feline embryos metabolized approximately twice as much glucose as pyruvate on Day 3 and approximately five times as much glucose on Day 6. The increased utilization of glucose through glycolysis during compaction and blastocyst formation is common among species [30, 32]. However, the ratio of pyruvate oxidation and glycolytic activity appears to be both stage specific and species specific. In 16-cell cattle embryos, the amounts of glucose and pyruvate metabolized through these pathways are approximately equal [65]. By the blastocyst stage, glycolytic activity is two to three times greater than pyruvate oxidation [6567] in bovine embryos, suggesting an increased reliance on pyruvate and/or a decreased reliance on glucose at both stages relative to feline embryos. In contrast, porcine embryos appear to depend even more heavily on glucose, metabolizing approximately 10 to 18 times more glucose than pyruvate at the eight-cell and morula stages, and approximately 20 to 27 times more glucose at the blastocyst stage [68]. Although comparisons between species evaluated in different studies must be made cautiously, these data suggest that carbohydrate metabolism in feline embryos differs from that in bovine and porcine embryos, reinforcing the need to customize culture media for each species.

During the first 3 days following fertilization, the combination of 1.5 mM glucose, 6.0 mM lactate, and 0.1 mM pyruvate produced embryos with higher cell numbers than in vivo embryos and metabolic profiles that were not statistically different from in vivo embryos. In contrast, late-stage feline embryos exhibited more sophisticated culture requirements. None of the tested carbohydrate combinations supported in vitro development beyond the 30-cell stage at rates equivalent to that of in vivo embryos. However, when metabolic activity was expressed as a ratio of the amount of pyruvate oxidized to glucose metabolized through glycolysis, in vitro embryos (0.19 pmol pyruvate per pmol glucose) were nearly identical to in vivo embryos (0.21 pmol pyruvate per pmol glucose). Together, these results suggest that carbohydrate composition of the culture medium, at least within the tested range, is not a major determining factor of feline embryo development, and carbohydrate metabolism does not seem to be compromised in cultured cat embryos. Similarly, embryos from rabbits, pigs, and sheep can develop to the blastocyst stage in the absence of carbohydrates [6971]. Possibly, amino acids or lipids are more critical for blastocyst development in cats, and monitoring activity of these metabolic pathways would provide a more accurate indicator of blastocyst viability.

It is well established that in vitro- and in vivo-derived embryos have different metabolic profiles [2, 68, 72, 73], but there has been relatively little research [34, 49, 71, 73, 74] exploring the effect of media composition on metabolic activity. In this study, the use of a factorial design allowed us to assess the impact of carbohydrate concentrations on feline embryo metabolism. Increasing the glucose concentration lowered the glycolytic activity of the feline blastocyst. In contrast, increasing extracellular glucose increases glycolytic activity in both cleavage- and blastocyst-stage mouse embryos [30, 33]. While it is certainly possible that species-specific responses do occur, differences in experimental conditions (e.g., the presence of NEAAs and glutamine) could explain the different responses of cat and mouse embryos to glucose [30]. Glycolysis in feline embryos also was affected by lactate concentrations at both early and late developmental stages. Elevated lactate was inhibitory to glycolysis in early cleavage-stage embryos, but stimulatory to glycolysis in blastocysts. The responses of murine embryos to extracellular lactate also are dose specific and stage specific. In mouse zygotes, increasing lactate concentrations from 0 to 10 mM increases glycolytic activity, whereas concentrations >10 mM decrease glycolysis [49]. However, lactate concentrations between 0 and 30 mM do not affect glycolytic activity in mouse morulae [49]. In the mouse embryo, the ability to maintain intracellular pH, lactate dehydrogenase activity, the change in redox state in response to lactate, and lactate metabolism also change during development from the zygote to the blastocyst stage [34, 49]. Similar mechanisms may operate in feline embryos in response to extracellular lactate. These results help to illustrate the complicated, species-specific nature of metabolic control that occurs within the developing embryo.

In several species, EAAs are inhibitory to the development of early embryos, although responses do vary in different media [3739]. In contrast, EAAs are stimulatory to blastocyst cell number, inner cell mass formation, and hatching when present at later developmental stages [27, 37]. Many of the EAAs' inhibitory effects have been attributed to NH4 produced when these amino acids are metabolized by the embryo or spontaneously break down at culture temperatures [27, 51, 75]. By reducing the EAA concentration and only including them in media for later-stage embryos, many of these inhibitory effects can be avoided [27, 37, 38]. In this study, EAAs were found to be inhibitory to early-stage feline embryos, as in other species. However, the EAAs also proved to be inhibitory to later stage feline embryos, even at reduced (i.e., 0.5x MEM) concentrations.

Species-specific responses to EAAs in culture could result from differences in systemic or embryonic physiology. In mice, increasing the proportion of dietary protein leads to elevated NH4 concentrations in reproductive tract fluids, and to altered gene expression and reduced viability among embryos grown in vivo [1]. Increasing circulating urea and/or ammonia/ammonium concentrations in ruminants also increases concentrations of these substances in reproductive tract fluids, affecting oocyte competence, embryo metabolism, and developmental kinetics [7679]. Because rodents and ruminants typically do not ingest high-protein diets, the sensitivity of oocytes and embryos from these species to EAAs and NH4 in vitro is not surprising. In contrast, the cat is an obligate carnivore whose diet always consists of a very high proportion of protein [80, 81]. However, unlike other species that recycle urea through the gut to conserve nitrogen, cats constitutively excrete a large amount of nitrogen; having little need to conserve a common nutrient in their diet and an increased need to avoid hyperammonemia [8184]. Due to the cat's efficient ability to clear nitrogenous waste from circulation, feline embryos may lack adaptive mechanisms to counter elevated NH4 concentrations. Analysis of feline oviductal and uterine fluids would be useful in determining the extent of NH4 exposure experienced by feline embryos in vivo.

Alternatively, the sensitivity of feline embryos to EAAs may reflect differences in embryonic physiology. In mice, the amount of metabolic NH4 in the medium remains relatively stable (~20–30 µM) regardless of the EAA concentration, suggesting that spontaneously produced NH4 is responsible for the inhibitory effects of elevated EAAs [27]. Since basic medium composition and culture conditions in the present study are similar to those used in other studies, cat embryos must be more sensitive to spontaneously produced NH4 or metabolize more EAAs than murine embryos [27, 28]. Feline embryos also could be better able to utilize extracellular protein to meet their amino acid needs, resulting in elevated metabolic NH4 even in the absence of exogenous EAAs. If the inhibitory effects of EAAs on feline embryos are indeed due to elevated amino acid metabolism, embryos grown in vivo must be exposed to and/or metabolize less EAA or be better able to cope with the resulting NH4. Studies concerning the control of amino acid and protein metabolism in feline embryos will be necessary to answer these questions.

The inclusion of FCS in the culture medium from Days 3 to 6 greatly improved embryonic development, allowing ~70% of cleaved embryos to reach the blastocyst stage in the same timeframe (i.e., by Day 6) as in vivo blastocyst development. Beneficial effects of serum on embryo development have been reported in other species [85, 86]. However, when ions, carbohydrates, and amino acid concentrations are optimized, high rates of blastocyst development can be achieved in rodents [39, 51, 57], ruminants [28, 40, 67, 86], and primates [29] without serum supplementation. Serum can be detrimental to embryonic ultrastructure [4], gene expression [10, 87], metabolism [40], and morphology [7, 40, 88], and can alter fetal growth rate and gestation length [7]. Serum also contains a wide variety of substances, including energy substrates, growth factors, cytokines, and hormones, that can vary from batch to batch [89]. Therefore, although FCS improved embryonic development, it should not be considered a final solution for feline embryo culture. Even with serum supplementation, blastocyst cell numbers in the present study were only one third of those for in vivo-produced embryos. Studies investigating the roles of growth factors, lipids, and other substances found in FCS would be useful in moving toward a defined medium that supports embryonic viability as effectively as, and preferably better than, FCS-supplemented media.

The beneficial effects of FCS on embryonic development also are interesting relative to our findings concerning EAAs. Even though FCS contains low concentrations of EAAs [89, 90], development was still greatly stimulated. The use of lower EAA concentrations would reduce direct negative effects of one or more inhibitory amino acids, as well as indirect negative effects caused by elevated concentrations of NH4, on embryonic physiology. Alternatively, serum contains a variety of substances that may allow the embryo to cope better with NH4. In fact, feline blastocysts are routinely produced in media containing EAAs, but most of these media also contain serum [1922]. Bovine embryos cope with NH4 in the medium by using it to convert pyruvate to alanine, which is secreted into the medium without affecting embryonic viability [91]. The pyruvate concentration used for feline embryos in FOCM was determined in the absence of EAA, but the optimal concentration of pyruvate may be dependent on the presence of EAAs. In support of this, the only study of cat embryos in which a relatively high (39.0%) proportion of embryos reached the blastocyst stage in the presence of EAAs and the absence of serum used a culture medium with three times more pyruvate (0.36 mM) than FOCM (0.1 mM) [92]. Although bovine embryos do not convert excess NH4 to urea in vitro [91], this pathway could be active in feline embryos. Cats have a reduced capacity to synthesize citrulline and ornithine, making them dependent on adequate dietary arginine or supplementation of these intermediates for proper urea cycle function and prevention of hyperammonemia [80, 81]. If the urea cycle is active in feline embryos, the presence of citrulline and ornithine in serum may explain the beneficial effects of FCS supplementation on development [89, 90].

In summary, this study represents the first attempt to intensively assess the physiologic requirements of feline embryos and tailor culture conditions to meet these specific needs. Our findings suggest that feline embryos exhibit unique developmental and metabolic requirements compared with the embryos of other species. Using this new information, a culture medium was formulated that produces embryos on Day 3 with cell numbers and metabolic profiles that are similar to age-matched in vivo-grown embryos. If serum is included in this medium after Day 3, a high proportion (~70%) of these embryos can develop into blastocysts on Day 6 with "in vivo-like" profiles of carbohydrate metabolism. However, total cell numbers in resulting blastocysts and overall development are still compromised relative to in vivo-produced embryos, and the in vivo viability of these cultured embryos has yet to be evaluated. Although additional research will be needed before truly "normal" feline embryos can be routinely produced in vitro, this study has helped to improve our understanding of feline embryo physiology and furthered our capacity to culture cat embryos.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are extremely grateful to Jackie Newsom, Suzanne Booker, and Carla Mascari for excellent care of all of the cats used in this study. Numerous volunteers are also thanked for their assistance maintaining the cats and monitoring anesthesia during surgical procedures. We are grateful to Dr. Ann Manharth for veterinary assistance, Ted Hunt for help with radioactive materials at University of Cincinnati, Roger Ruff for help with laboratory space at University of Cincinnati, Dr. Rebecca Spindler for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and Dr. Normand St.-Pierre for his assistance with statistical analysis. Finally, special thanks to Desperado and Cassanova for their cooperation and dedication throughout this study.

FOOTNOTES

1Supported by 5R24RR15388-5 from the National Institute of Health to W.F.S. Back

Correspondence: 2Jason R. Herrick, C.R.E.W./Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden, 3400 Vine St., Cincinnati, OH 45220. FAX: 513 569 8213; e-mail: jason.herrick{at}cincinnatizoo.org

Received: 11 October 2006.

First decision: 15 November 2006.

Accepted: 22 January 2007.

REFERENCES

  1. Gardner DK and Lane M. Ex vivo early embryo development and effects on gene expression and imprinting. Reprod Fertil Dev 2005; 17:361–370[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Lane M and Gardner DK. Amino acids and vitamins prevent culture-induced metabolic perturbations and associated loss of viability of mouse blastocysts. Hum Reprod 1998; 13:991–997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Lane M and Gardner DK. Understanding cellular disruptions during early embryo development that perturb viability and fetal development. Reprod Fertil Dev 2005; 17:371–378[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Crosier AE, Farin PW, Dykstra MJ, Alexander JE, Farin CE. Ultrastructural morphometry of bovine blastocysts produced in vivo or in vitro. Biol Reprod 2001; 64:1375–1385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Holm P, Booth PJ, Callesen H. Kinetics of early in vitro development of bovine in vivo- and in vitro-derived zygotes produced and/or cultured in chemically defined or serum-containing media. Reproduction 2002; 123:553–565[Abstract]
  6. Rinaudo P and Schultz RM. Effects of embryo culture on global pattern of gene expression in preimplantation mouse embryos. Reproduction 2004; 128:301–311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Thompson JG, Gardner DK, Pugh PA, McMillan WH, Tervit HR. Lamb birth weight is affected by culture system utilized during in vitro pre-elongation development of ovine embryos. Biol Reprod 1995; 53:1385–1391[Abstract]
  8. Lane M and Gardner DK. Selection of viable mouse blastocysts prior to transfer using a metabolic criterion. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:1975–1978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Khosla S, Dean W, Reik W, Feil R. Epigenetic and experimental modifications in early mammalian development: part II, Culture of preimplantation embryos and its long-term effects on gene expression and phenotype. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7:419–427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Fernández-Gonzalez R, Moreira P, Bilbao A, Jiménez A, Pérez-Crespo M, Ramírez MA, Rodriguez De Fonseca F, Pintado B, Gutiérrez-Adán A. Long-term effect of in vitro culture of mouse embryos with serum on mRNA expression of imprinting genes, development, and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:5880–5885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Bower C and Hansen M. Assisted reproductive technologies and birth outcomes: overview of recent systematic reviews. Reprod Fertil Dev 2005; 17:329–333[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Hamner CE, Jennings LL, Sojka NJ. Cat (Felis catus L.) spermatozoa require capacitation. J Reprod Fertil 1970; 23:477–480[Medline]
  13. Bowen RA. Fertilization in vitro of feline ova by spermatozoa from the ductus deferens. Biol Reprod 1977; 17:144–147[Abstract]
  14. Johnston LA, Donoghue AM, O'Brien SJ, Wildt DE. Influence of temperature and gas atmosphere on in-vitro fertilization and embryo development in domestic cats. J Reprod Fertil 1991; 92:377–382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Johnston LA, Donoghue AM, O'Brien SJ, Wildt DE. Culture medium and protein supplementation influence in vitro fertilization and embryo development in the domestic cat. J Exp Zool 1991; 257:350–359[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Johnston LA, Donoghue AM, O'Brien SJ, Wildt DE. Influence of culture medium and protein supplementation on in vitro oocyte maturation and fertilization in the domestic cat. Therio 1993; 40:829–839[CrossRef]
  17. Roth TL, Donoghue AM, Byers AP, Wildt DE, Munson L. Influence of oviductal cell monolayer coculture and the presence of corpora hemorrhagica at the time of oocyte aspiration on gamete interaction in vitro in the domestic cat. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993; 10:523–529[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Swanson WF, Roth TL, Godke RA. Persistence of the developmental block of in vitro fertilized domestic cat embryos to temporal variations in culture conditions. Mol Reprod Dev 1996; 43:298–305[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Kanda M, Miyazaki T, Kanda M, Nakao H, Tsutsui T. Development of in vitro fertilized feline embryos in a modified Earle's balanced salt solution: influence of protein supplements and culture dishes on fertilization success and blastocyst formation. J Vet Med Sci 1998; 60:423–431[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Gómez MC, Pope CE, Harris R, Davis A, Mikota S, Dresser BL. Births of kittens produced by intracytoplasmic sperm injection of domestic cat oocytes matured in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev 2000; 12:423–433[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Freistedt P, Stojkovic M, Wolf E. Efficient in vitro production of cat embryos in modified synthetic oviduct fluid medium: effects of season and ovarian status. Biol Reprod 2001; 65:9–13[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Spindler RE, Pukazhenthi BS, Wildt DE. Oocyte metabolism predicts the development of cat embryos to blastocyst in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 2000; 56:163–171[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Goodrowe KL, Wall RJ, O'Brien SJ, Schmidt PM, Wildt DE. Developmental competence of domestic cat follicular oocytes after fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod 1988; 39:355–372[Abstract]
  24. Pope CE. Embryo technology in conservation efforts for endangered felids. Therio 2000; 53:163–174[CrossRef]
  25. Swanson WF, Roth TL, Wildt DE. In vivo embryogenesis, embryo migration, and embryonic mortality in the domestic cat. Biol Reprod 1994; 51:452–464[Abstract]
  26. Roth TL, Swanson WF, Wildt DE. Developmental competence of domestic cat embryos fertilized in vivo versus in vitro. Biol Reprod 1994; 51:441–451[Abstract]
  27. Lane M, Hooper K, Gardner DK. Effect of essential amino acids on mouse embryo viability and ammonium production. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001; 18:519–525[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Lane M, Gardner DK, Hasler MJ, Hasler JF. Use of G1.2/G2.2 media for commercial bovine embryo culture: equivalent development and pregnancy rates compared to co-culture. Theriogenology 2003; 60:407–419[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Gardner DK, Lane M, Schoolcraft WB. Physiology and culture of the human blastocyst. J Reprod Immunol 2002; 55:85–100[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Gardner DK. Changes in requirements and utilization of nutrients during mammalian preimplantation embryo development and their significance in embryo culture. Theriogenology 1998; 49:83–102[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Lane M and Gardner DK. Regulation of ionic homeostasis by mammalian embryos. Sem Reprod Med 2000; 18:195–204[CrossRef]
  32. Thompson JG. In vitro culture and embryo metabolism of cattle and sheep embryos—a decade of achievement. Anim Reprod Sci 2000; 60–61:263–275
  33. Gardner DK, Pool TB, Lane M. Embryo nutrition and energy metabolism and its relationship to embryo growth, differentiation, and viability. Sem Reprod Med 2000; 18:205–218[CrossRef]
  34. Lane M and Gardner DK. Lactate regulates pyruvate uptake and metabolism in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:16–22[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Gardner DK, Lane M, Calderon H, Leeton J. Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterinefluids and metabolism of cumulus cells. Fertil Steril 1996; 65:349–353[Medline]
  36. Harris SE, Gopichandran N, Picton HM, Leese HJ, Orsi NM. Nutrient concentrations in murine follicular fluid and the female reproductive tract. Theriogenology 2005; 64:992–1006[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Lane M and Gardner DK. Differential regulation of mouse embryo development and viability by amino acids. J Reprod Fertil 1997; 109:153–164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Steeves TE and Gardner DK. Temporal and differential effects of amino acids on bovine embryo development in culture. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:731–740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Biggers JD, McGinnis LK, Raffin M. Amino acids and preimplantation development of the mouse in protein-free potassium simplex optimized medium. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:281–293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Gardner DK, Lane M, Spitzer A, Batt PA. Enhanced rates of cleavage and development for sheep zygotes cultured to the blastocyst stage in vitro in the absence of serum and somatic cells: amino acids, vitamins, and culturing embryos in groups stimulate development. Biol Reprod 1994; 50:390–400[Abstract]
  41. Leese HJ. What does an embryo need? Hum Fertil 2003; 6:180–185
  42. Summers MC and Biggers JD. Chemically defined media and the culture of mammalian preimplantation embryos: historical perspective and current issues. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9:557–582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. McKiernan SH and Bavister BD. Timing of development is a critical parameter for predicting successful embryogenesis. Hum Reprod 1994; 9:2123–2129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Kane MT. The effects of water-soluble vitamins on the expansion of rabbit blastocysts in vitro. J Exp Zool 1988; 245:220–223[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Arii K, Kai T, Kokuba Y. Degradation kinetics of L-alanyl-L-glutamine and its derivatives in aqueous solution. Eur J Pharm Sci 1998; 7:107–112
  46. Pursel VG, Wall RJ, Rexroad CE Jr, Hammer RE, Brinster RL. A rapid whole-mount staining procedure for nuclei of mammalian embryos. Theriogenology 1985; 24:687–691[CrossRef]
  47. Herrick JR, Lane M, Gardner DK, Behboodi E, Memili E, Blash S, Echelard Y, Krisher RL. Metabolism, protein content, and in vitro embryonic development of goat cumulus-oocyte complexes matured with physiological concentrations of glucose and L-lactate. Mol Reprod Dev 2006; 73:256–266[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Edwards LJ, Batt PA, Gandolfi F, Gardner DK. Modifications made to culture medium by bovine oviduct epithelial cells: changes to carbohydrates stimulate bovine embryo development. Mol Reprod Dev 1997; 46:146–154[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Edwards LJ, Williams DA, Gardner DK. Intracellular pH of the preimplantation mouse embryo: effects of extracellular pH and weak acids. Mol Reprod Dev 1998; 50:434–442[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Atanassov C, Seiler N, Rebel G. Reduction of ammonia formation in cell cultures by L-alanyl-L-glutamine requires optimization of the dipeptide concentration. J Biotech 1998; 62:159–162[CrossRef]
  51. Lane M and Gardner DK. Ammonium induces aberrant blastocyst differentiation, metabolism, pH regulation, gene expression and subsequently alters fetal development in the mouse. Biol Reprod 2003; 69:1109–1117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Spindler RE and Wildt DE. Quality and age of companion felid embryos modulate enhanced development by group culture. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:167–173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. SAS System for Mixed Models. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD. 1996.Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc;
  54. Experimental Research Design and Analysis. Hoshmand AR. 1994:Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press;15–41
  55. Anbari K and Schultz RM. Effect of sodium and betaine in culture media on development and relative rates of protein synthesis in preimplantation mouse embryos in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1993; 35:24–28[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Ho Y, Doherty AS, Schultz RM. Mouse preimplantation embryo development in vitro: effect of sodium concentration in culture media on RNA synthesis and accumulation and gene expression. Mol Reprod Dev 1994; 38:131–141[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Ludwig TE, Squirrell JM, Palmenberg AC, Bavister BD. Relationship between development, metabolism, and mitochondrial organization in 2-cell hamster embryos in the presence of low levels of phosphate. Biol Reprod 2001; 65:1648–1654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Lawitts JA and Biggers JD. Joint effects of sodium chloride, glutamine, and glucose in mouse preimplantation embryo culture media. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 31:189–194[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Beckmann LS and Day BN. Effects of media NaCl concentration and osmolarity on the culture of early-stage porcine embryos and the viability of embryos cultured in a selected superior medium. Theriogenology 1993; 39:611–622[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Liu Z and Foote RH. Sodium chloride, osmolyte, and osmolarity effects on blastocyst formation in bovine embryos produced by in vitro fertilization (IVF) and cultured in simple serum-free media. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996; 13:562–568[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Dawson KM and Baltz JM. Organic osmolytes and embryos: substrates of the Gly and β transport systems protect mouse zygotes against the effects of raised osmolarity. Biol Reprod 1997; 56:1550–1558[Abstract]
  62. Dumoulin JCM, van Wissen LCP, Menheere PPCA, Michiels AHJC, Geraedts JPM, Evers JLH. Taurine acts as an osmolyte in human and mouse oocytes and embryos. Biol Reprod 1997; 56:739–744[Abstract]
  63. Quinn P. Enhanced results in mouse and human embryo culture using a modified human tubal fluid medium lacking glucose and phosphate. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995; 12:97–105[Medline]
  64. Pope WF. Embryogenesis recapitulates oogenesis in swine. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1992; 199:273–281[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Rieger D, Loskutoff NM, Betteridge KJ. Developmentally related changes in the uptake and metabolism of glucose, glutamine and pyruvate by cattle embryos produced in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev 1992; 4:547–557[CrossRef][Medline]
  66. Rieger D and Guay P. Measurement of the metabolism of energy substrates in individual bovine blastocysts. J Reprod Fertil 1988; 83:585–591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Krisher RL, Lane M, Bavister BD. Developmental competence and metabolism of bovine embryos cultured in semi-defined and defined culture media. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:1345–1352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Swain JE, Bormann CL, Clark SG, Walters EM, Wheeler MB, Krisher RL. Use of energy substrates by various stage preimplantation pig embryos produced in vivo and in vitro. Reproduction 2002; 123:253–260[Abstract]
  69. Kane MT. Energy substrates and culture of single cell rabbit ova to blastocysts. Nature 1972; 238:468–469[CrossRef][Medline]
  70. Petters RM, Johnson BH, Reed ML, Archibong AE. Glucose, glutamine and inorganic phosphate in early development of the pig embryo in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1990; 89:269–275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Thompson JG, Simpson AC, Pugh PA, Tervit HR. Requirement for glucose during in vitro culture of sheep preimplantation embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 31:253–257[CrossRef][Medline]
  72. Thompson JGE, Simpson AC, Pugh PA, Wright RW Jr, Tervit HR. Glucose utilization by sheep embryos derived in vivo and in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev 1991; 3:571–576[CrossRef][Medline]
  73. Khurana NK and Niemann H. Energy metabolism in preimplantation bovine embryos derived in vitro or in vivo. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:847–856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Gardner DK and Leese HJ. The role of glucose and pyruvate transport in regulating nutrient utilization by preimplantation mouse embryos. Development 1988; 104:423–429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Gardner DK and Lane M. Amino acids and ammonium regulate mouse embryo development in culture. Biol Reprod 1993; 48:377–385[Abstract]
  76. McEvoy TG, Robinson JJ, Aitken RP, Findlay PA, Robertson IS. Dietary excesses of urea influence the viability and metabolism of preimplantation sheep embryos and may affect fetal growth among survivors. Anim Reprod Sci 1997; 47:71–90[CrossRef][Medline]
  77. Sinclair KD, Kuran M, Gebbie FE, Webb R, McEvoy TG. Nitrogen metabolism and fertility in cattle: II. Development of oocytes recovered from heifers offered diets differeing in their rate of nitrogen release in the rumen. J Anim Sci 2000; 78:2670–2680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. Kenny DA, Humpherson PG, Leese HJ, Morris DG, Tomos AD, Diskin MG, Sreenan JM. Effect of elevated systemic concentrations of ammonia and urea on the metabolite and ionic composition of oviductal fluid in cattle. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:1797–1804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Hammon DS, Holyoak GR, Dhiman TR. Association between blood plasma urea nitrogen levels and reproductive fluid urea nitrogen and ammonia concentrations in early lactation dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2005; 86:195–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  80. MacDonald ML, Rogers QR, Morris JG. Nutrition of the domestic cat, a mammalian carnivore. Ann Rev Nutr 1984; 4:521–562[CrossRef][Medline]
  81. Zoran DL. The carnivore connection to nutrition in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221:1559–1567[CrossRef][Medline]
  82. Biourge V, Groff JM, Fisher C, Bee D, Morris JG, Rogers QR. Nitrogen balance, plasma free amino acid concentrations and urinary orotic acid excretion during long-term fasting in cats. J Nutr 1994; 124:1094–1103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  83. Russell K, Lobley GE, Rawlings J, Millward DJ, Harper EJ. Urea kinetics of a carnivore, Felis silvestris catus. Br J Nutr 2000; 84:597–604[Medline]
  84. Russell K, Lobley GE, Millward DJ. Whole-body protein turnover of a carnivore, Felis silvestris catus. Br J Nutr 2003; 89:29–37[CrossRef][Medline]
  85. Dobrinsky JR, Johnson LA, Rath D. Development of a culture medium (BECM-3) for porcine embryos: effects of bovine serum albumin and fetal bovine serum on embryo development. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:1069–1074[Abstract]
  86. Stojkovic M, Kölle S, Peinl S, Stojkovic P, Zakhartchenko V, Thompson JG, Wenigerkind H, Reichenbach HD, Sinowatz F, Wolf E. Effects of high concentrations of hyaluronan in culture medium on development and survival rates of fresh and frozen-thawed bovine embryos produced in vitro. Reproduction 2002; 124:141–153[Abstract]
  87. Rizos D, Gutiérrez-Adán A, Pérez-Garnelo S, de la Fuente J, Boland MP, Lonergan P. Bovine embryo culture in the presence or absence of serum: implications for blastocyst development, cryotolerance, and messenger RNA expression. Biol Reprod 2003; 68:236–243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Ferguson EM and Leese HJ. Triglyceride content of bovine oocytes and early embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1999; 116:373–378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  89. Kuran M, Robinson JJ, Brown DS, McEvoy TG. Development, amino acid utilization and cell allocation in bovine embryos after in vitro production in contrasting culture systems. Reproduction 2002; 124:155–165[Abstract]
  90. Elhassan YM, Wu G, Leanez AC, Tasca RJ, Watson AJ, Westhusin ME. Amino acid concentrations in fluids from the bovine oviduct and uterus and in KSOM-based culture media. Theriogenology 2001; 55:1907–1918[CrossRef][Medline]
  91. Orsi NM and Leese HJ. Ammonium exposure and pyruvate affect the amino acid metabolism of bovine blastocysts in vitro. Reproduction 2004; 127:131–140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  92. Karja NWK, Otoi T, Murakami M, Yuge M, Fahrudin M, Suzuki T. Effect of protein supplementation on development to the hatching and hatched blastocyst stages of cat IVF embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev 2002; 14:291–296[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Supplemental Tables]
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
76/5/858    most recent
biolreprod.106.058065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herrick, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herrick, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, W. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Herrick, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, W. F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS