Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 20, 2008.
Biol Reprod 2008, 10.1095/biolreprod.107.066340
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
78/6/1038    most recent
biolreprod.107.066340v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sriraman, V.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sriraman, V.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sriraman, V.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 78, 1038–1048 (2008)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.066340
© 2008 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Ovary; 

Regulated Expression of ADAM8 (a Disintegrin and Metalloprotease Domain 8) in the Mouse Ovary: Evidence for a Regulatory Role of Luteinizing Hormone, Progesterone Receptor, and Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Growth Factors1

Venkataraman Sriraman 2, Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter 3, Jörg W. Bartsch 4, Andrea Rittger 5, Sabine M. Mulders 6, and JoAnne S. Richards 7

Institute of Genetechnology/Microbiology,3 University of Bielefeld, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany Department of Biochemistry,4 King's College London, London SE1 9NH, United Kingdom Biochemical Institute,5 University of Kiel, 24098 Kiel, Germany N.V. Organon,6 5340 BH Oss, The Netherlands Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology,7 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030

ABSTRACT

ADAM8 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain 8) is expressed in immune, neuronal, and bone progenitor cells and is thought to be involved in the tissue-remodeling process. Microarray analyses indicate that Adam8 is a potential target of the progesterone receptor (Pgr) in murine ovary. Further studies document that Adam8 mRNA and protein are expressed in granulosa cells and cumulus cells of periovulatory follicles whereas expression is significantly reduced in Pgr null mice that fail to ovulate. There is a reduced expression in granulosa cells from cultured, in vitro ovulated follicles exposed to inhibitors of progesterone or epidermal growth factor signaling while epiregulin induced its expression in the absence of hCG. In vitro studies with primary mouse granulosa cells document that Adam8 is induced in response to forskolin (Fo) and phorbol ester (PMA) or Fo and Amphiregulin treatment. To understand the transcriptional regulation of the Adam8, we amplified 1 kb of the mouse Adam8 promoter by PCR and subcloned it into a pGL3-luciferase reporter construct. The Adam8 promoter-luciferase constructs are induced by Fo and PMA treatment after transfection into rat granulosa cells, and cotransfection with a PGR-A expression vector further augment basal and Fo/PMA inducibility. Site-specific mutations within the –615/+50 promoter document that a GC-rich region, NF-1 (nuclear factor-1) site, and putative TATA box are critical for Adam8 promoter activation by Fo/PMA. Thus, ADAM8 is expressed in a stage-specific manner and is hormonally regulated in ovulating follicles by the coordinate actions of LH and PGR. To our knowledge, ADAM8 is the first member of the ADAM family shown to be hormonally regulated.

luteinizing hormone, ovary, ovulation, progesterone receptor

INTRODUCTION

Ovulation is a complex event in mammalian reproduction and resembles an inflammatory reaction [1]. This process is associated with significant changes in the extracellular matrix of the ovary that control the release of the oocyte from the mature preovulatory follicle [1, 2]. Matrix-modifying enzymes, namely, cathepsins [3, 4], ADAMTSs (a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain with thrombospondin motifs) [5], matrix metalloproteinases [6], and plasmin [7], have been implicated in these remodeling events. The nuclear transcription factor progesterone receptor (Pgr) is critical for ovulation, and mice null for Pgr do not ovulate and are infertile due to severe defects in the ovary, uterus, and mammary gland [8]. The PGR-A isoform is predominantly expressed in granulosa cells, and one prevailing hypothesis is that PGR regulates follicular rupture by induction of matrix-modifying enzymes such as ADAMTS1, cathepsin L (Ctsl) [9], and plasminogen activator system [7]. In our studies of Pgr null mice (PRKO), Adam8 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain 8) was identified as a putative PGR target gene, and this suggests that it may be expressed in a stage-specific manner by PGR action.

The ADAMTS1 protein is one of the first members of the metzincin superfamily that was shown to be essential for cumulus expansion [10]. Targeted disruption of the Adamts1 gene leads to subfertility in mice [11]. ADAMTS1 is induced by the progesterone-signaling pathway [9], while the role and control of the other members of the ADAMs family in the ovary remain unknown. ADAM proteins constitute a family of transmembrane glycoproteins with essential physiological roles in fertilization, neovascularization, myogenesis, and neurogenesis [12, 13]. They are composed of several conserved and characteristic structural modules, including a prodomain, metalloprotease domain, disintegrin domain, cysteine-rich region, EGF (epidermal growth factor) repeat transmembrane domain, and cytoplasmic tail [12, 13]. Distinct structural domains within these proteins confer specific functions in cell-cell fusion, cell-cell interactions, or metalloprotease activity [12, 13].

ADAM8 was originally cloned from mouse macrophages [14] and is expressed in neurons and oligodendrocytes [15], and, with the exception of T-cells, in most human immune cell types [13]. ADAM8 contains the catalytic consensus sequence HEXXHXXGXXHD required for the metalloproteinase activity, and the recombinant soluble ADAM8 possesses catalytic activity [16]. In vitro, it can cleave myelin basic protein (MBP), amyloid polypeptide precursor protein, and FCER2 (Fc fragment of IgE receptor; CD23), a low-affinity IgE receptor that promotes cell motility and leukocyte infiltration [17]. Recently the neural cell adhesion molecule close homologue of L1, termed CHL1 [18], that promotes neurite outgrowth and suppresses neuronal cell death has been shown to be a substrate of ADAM8. Expression of catalytically active ADAM8 is associated with increased invasive activity and/or extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling [19]. Thus, ADAM8 can influence inflammation, cell adhesion, and migration processes that are relevant to the ovulatory process.

The goal of this study was to understand the hormonal regulation of ADAM8 expression in ovary during follicular development, ovulation, and luteinization, employing a number of different experimental approaches to study control of expression of Adam8. These included analysis of expression of Adam8 in ovary of in vivo ovulated follicles and in hormonally stimulated control and PRKO mice. Furthermore, expression was analyzed in granulosa cells from preantral follicle cultures stimulated by hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) and EGF to ovulate in vitro, with and without exposure to inhibitors of PGR and EGF receptor during the preovulatory period. Finally, we studied luciferase expression from a transgene carrying different segments of the Adam8 promoter in mammalian primary granulosa cells stimulated by forskolin and phorbol ester that activates protein kinase A and protein kinase C signaling pathways. Although the function of Adam8 in the preovulatory follicle in vivo remains elusive, our studies document the induction of Adam8 mRNA and protein in mammalian granulosa cells and of mRNA in cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs) of the preovulatory follicle and a role for LH and PGR in the induction of this gene.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents

Equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) and forskolin (Fo) were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA) and hCG from American Pharmaceutical Partners Inc. (Schaumburg, IL). Recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) and recombinant follicular stimulating hormone (rFSH) were from Serono (Unterschleißheim, Germany, kindly donated), and recombinant epidermal growth factor (rEGF) was from Promega (Mannheim, Germany). Media and cell culture reagents and materials were procured from Life Technologies, Inc. (Grand Island, NY) and Corning Inc. (Corning, NY); fetal bovine serum was procured from Hyclone Laboratories, Inc. (Logan, UT). L15 Leibovitz-glutamax medium, fetal calf serum, and {alpha}-minimal essential medium with glutamax for preantral follicle culture were from GIBCO Invitrogen (Karlsruhe, Germany). Insulin-transferrin-selenium mixture and progesterone receptor inhibitor RU486 were purchased from Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany), and AG1478 inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was from Calbiochem. Epiregulin came from R & D Systems (Wiesbaden, Germany). Trypsin, soybean trypsin inhibitor, deoxyribonuclease, and PMA (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO), electrophoresis and molecular biology-grade reagents were obtained from Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (Richmond, CA), and reagents for RT-PCR were obtained from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI). Amphiregulin (AREG) was obtained from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN). Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Sigma-Genosys (Houston, TX). The generation of rabbit polyclonal antibodies against ADAM8 has been described [15], and its application in Western blots have been demonstrated earlier [15, 16].

Animals and Hormone Treatment

Immature (23 days old) C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. (Indianapolis, IN) and housed under a 16 h light and 8 h dark schedule in the Center for Comparative Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine with food and water ad libitum. Mice were injected i.p. with 4 IU eCG to stimulate follicular growth, and after 44 h with 5 IU hCG (i.p.), which, like LH, induces ovulation and luteinization. Ovulation occurs approximately 12–16 h after hCG administration in this model [20]. Ovaries were isolated from these hormone-stimulated mice at selected time intervals for extraction of RNA and protein, or fixed for in situ hybridization. Pgr null mice were used in selected experiments because follicles develop normally in response to eCG but fail to ovulate in response to hCG [9]. Cumulus-oocyte-complexes were isolated from eCG treated mice (0 h) as well as from preovulatory and ovulating follicles of eCG- and hCG-stimulated mice (8 and 12 h). Ovulated COCs were collected from oviduct at 16 and 24 h.

C57BL/6 mice for preantral follicle culture were maintained at Bielefeld University under a 12 h light and 12 h dark cycle with food and water ad libitum, and animal experimentation was conducted under a permit from the university authorities.

Rat granulosa cells were employed for transfection studies to analyze Adam8 promoter. Intact immature (23 days old) Holtzman Sprague Dawley females (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc., Indianapolis, IN) were housed under a 16 h light and 8 h dark schedule in the Center for Comparative Medicine at Baylor college of Medicine with food and water ad libitum. The rats were injected with estradiol-17β (E2) for 3 days (1.5 mg E2/0.2 ml in propylene glycol), and the ovaries were harvested for isolation of granulosa cells. All Animals were treated in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, as approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX).

RNA Isolation from Whole Ovary, Granulosa Cells, and COCs, and RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from whole ovaries, granulosa cells, and COCs of immature (23 days old) untreated mice, and from eCG- and hCG-treated mice, using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.) and purified as described in the manufacturer's instructions. For each RNA sample, whole ovaries, granulosa cells, or COCs were pooled separately from two or three animals. RNA was similarly prepared from cultured cells. To determine the expression of Adam8 in ovary, 2 µg of RNA were reverse transcribed in 20 µl reaction containing oligo-deoxythymidine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Newark, NJ) and AMV (avian myeloblastosis virus) reverse transcriptase (Promega Corp.) at 42°C for 75 min [20]. cDNA (2 µl) obtained from reverse transcription reaction was subjected to labeled PCR with [P32]deoxy-CTP (ICN, Los Angeles, CA) using Taq polymerase [20] and specific primers for Adam8 and Rpl19 (Table 1). All PCRs were carried out within the experimentally determined linear amplification range. The ribosomal protein L19 (Rpl19) was employed as an internal control. PCR products were resolved by a 6% PAGE and visualized by autoradiography [20]. The products were quantified using PhosphoImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) [20]. All PCR products were cloned in TOPO vector, and their authenticity was confirmed by sequencing at the Baylor College of Medicine Core Facility.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
TABLE 1. List of primers employed for RT-PCR and cloning promoter constructs.

In Situ Hybridization

In situ hybridization was performed as described previously and as reported by our laboratory [20]. The experiments were performed with four ovarian serial sections obtained from three separate hormonal treatments for each time point. Eight to ten follicles at each stage were assessed for hybridization. The riboprobe in vitro transcription system kit (Promega Corp.) was used to make [S35] uridine triphosphate-labeled antisense and sense probes from the mouse Adam8 cDNA. The cDNA probe were generated by RT-PCR amplification and TOPO TA cloning (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA); their identity was verified by sequencing, and their specificity was verified by basic local alignment and search tool analyses. Ovaries were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 7 µm onto Fisher Brand Superfrost Plus microscope slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Tissue sections were rehydrated, treated with 20 µg/ml proteinase K and 0.1 M triethanolamine/acetic anhydride, dehydrated, and incubated with radiolabeled riboprobe overnight at 55°C. The next day, slides were washed at high stringency, dried, and exposed to X-OMAT film (Kodak, Rochester, NY) overnight to determine the specificity and intensity of the probe. Slides were dipped in photographic NTB-2 emulsion, exposed at 4°C for an appropriate length of time, developed with D-19 developer and fixer (Kodak), and stained with hematoxylin. Tissue histology was observed by both light-field illumination and dark-field illumination to visualize the regions of hybridization.

Western Blot Analyses

Protein extracts from mouse ovaries were prepared by homogenization in 6 M urea and 0.1% Triton buffers containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 0.05 M EDTA [21]. Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method, and for Western Blot analyses of ADAM8, 20 µg protein were loaded onto gels. Samples were resolved in 10% acrylamide gels under reducing SDS-PAGE conditions and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 2 h, followed by overnight incubation with ADAM8 antiserum, total ERK (extracellular signal-related kinase) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), or preimmune serum obtained before immunization of ADAM8 peptide at 1:1000 dilution and then washed with TBST (10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20). Subsequently, blots were incubated with 1:12,500 diluted horseradish peroxidase linked to anti-rabbit IgG (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) and then washed with TBST. Immunoreactive bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence according to the manufacturer's specifications (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). The blots that were probed with ADAM8 antibody were also probed {alpha}-actin antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The assessment of {alpha}-actin and total ERK expression served as a loading control. The immunoreactive bands were quantitated by densitometer (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) and Image quant 5.0 software.

Mouse Preantral Follicle Culture

Preantral follicles were manually isolated from 16 to 18 day old C57BL/6 mice. Cell culture was essentially as previously described [2225]. Briefly, preantral follicles of 100–130 µm diameter with two to three layers of granulosa cells and some theca cells (3b follicles) [26] were mechanically isolated in L15 Leibovitz-glutamax medium with foetal calf serum and antibiotics. Individual follicles were placed into 50 µl of culture medium consisting of {alpha}-minimal essential medium with glutamax, supplemented with 10 µIU/ml rLH, 10 µIU/ml rFSH, foetal calf serum, and an insulin-transferrin-selenium mixture in 96 microtiter plates (Costar, Schiphol-Rijk, Netherlands) covered by a layer of 30 µl mineral oil. At each fourth day of culture, 20 µl medium containing 10 µIU of rFSH but no rLH was replenished. At Day 12 when antral-like cavities had developed and oocytes had grown and reached maturational competence, oocyte resumption of maturation and in vitro ovulation was induced by adding 1.5 IU/ml recombinant hCG (rhCG) and 5ng/ml rEGF. Four and 18 h later, when oocytes had undergone germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) or reached metaphase II and emitted a first polar body (PB) and when in vitro ovulation had occurred, respectively, the mural granulosa cells were collected for RNA preparation and analysis of expression of Adam8 by quantitative RT-PCR.

In order to study the influence of PGR- or EGFR-mediated signaling on Adam8 expression in follicles stimulated for in vitro ovulation, 1 µM of RU486 (PGR inhibitor) or 10 µM AG1478 (EGFR inhibitor) were added to the antral follicles together with rhCG and rEGF on Day 12 of culture. In one set of experiments, 100 ng/ml epiregulin was added on Day 12 instead of rhCG and rEGF to induce in vitro ovulation.

Oocytes retrieved from in vitro ovulated follicles were vital stained for chromatin with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma, Germany; 20 min in M2 medium) and analyzed for induction of GVBD or PB formation with a Zeiss (Axiovert 10). Images of in vitro ovulated COCs or isolated oocytes were obtained using a Canon PC1099 camera attached to the Zeiss Axiovert microscope.

RNA Isolation and Quantitative RT-PCR from Granulosa Cells of In Vitro Grown Follicles

About 100 ng of total RNA isolated from follicles were transcribed with Expand Reverse Transcriptase (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) in a volume of 20 µl; 2 µl of the RT-product was used for PCR in a 20 µl reaction volume with primers indicated in Table 1. Real-time PCR consisted of a 20 µl reaction with QuantiTecti SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and 2 µl of the RT product was used as the template. Specific Adam8 transcript numbers were normalized to the ribosomal L7 gene (Rpl7) as described elsewhere [19] and presented as normalized values relative to controls (control = 1). Experiments with control and inhibitors were performed in triplicate with isolation of follicles for RNA isolation from control and treatment group of each experimental group. Granulosa cells were pooled from 15 to 20 follicles from each plate. Relative increase or decease in Adam8 mRNA/amplification product was calculated relative to the untreated controls in the studies with inhibitor or in the epiregulin study, comparing data from triplicate RT-PCR assays.

sAdam8 Promoter Constructs and Mutants

The mouse Adam8 promoter (–1065/+50) was amplified using specific primers containing Nhe and XhoI sites and ligated to the pGL3 luciferase reporter plasmid using PCR cloning techniques. PCR primers were designed based on previous studies that characterized the Adam8 gene and putative transcription factor binding sites. In addition, three other Adam8 promoter regions that extend from –615 /+50. –240/+50, and –106/+50 that span the transcription start site +1 were amplified and subcloned. The authenticity of each construct was verified by sequence analysis in both directions. Site-specific mutations in the Adam8 promoter constructs were generated using the gene editor site-directed mutagenesis kit from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI). Oligonucleotides used for creating site-specific mutations at the critical nucleotides necessary for transcription factor binding to the GC boxes, NF-1 (nuclear factor-1) site, and the TATA box are listed in Table 1. The mutants obtained were confirmed by sequencing.

Granulosa Cell Culture and Transfection

Rat granulosa cells were harvested by needle puncture of the ovaries and processed described previously [3]. Briefly, cells were cultured in 12-well culture plates at a density of 0.5 x 106 cells/1.5 ml in 5% serum containing medium (DMEM:F12 containing penicillin and streptomycin). Two hours after plating, cells were transiently transfected with 500 ng of the respective promoter-reporter constructs with Fugene 6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) overnight. On the next day, cells were washed and cultured in fresh, serum-free medium containing 10 µM Fo, 20 nM PMA, 100 ng/ml AREG, Fo/PMA, or Fo/AREG, and after 4 h harvested with lysis buffer (0.2 M Tris, pH 8.0, containing 0.1% Triton X-100). An additional group of cells were transfected with pSCT empty vector or the PGR-A expressing pSCT-PGR-A construct (10 ng). Fo and PMA have been used previously to mimic the effects of the LH surge and optimal induction of Ptgs2 and Pgr in cultured rat granulosa cells [27, 28]. Luciferase activity in the extracts was analyzed according to a standard protocol [29]. In brief, a 40 µl aliquot of the cell lysate was mixed automatically with 100 µl luciferase assay reagent (20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 4 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM EDTA, 30 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM ATP, 0.5 mM luciferin, and 0.25 mM coenzyme A), and each reaction was monitored 20 sec in a luminometer. The protein concentrations were determined by mini-Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Data are expressed based on the amount of protein in each sample: light-specific units (LSUs) per microgram of protein (mean ± SD). Transfection of empty pGL3 vector in granulosa cells showed basal values that were less than unstimulated wild-type pGL3–1065/+50 construct. The inducibility of pGL3 by Fo/PMA was never more than 1.5-fold in each experiment.

Primary mouse granulosa cells isolated from eCG-primed mice ovaries by needle puncture was employed to investigate agonist-induced Adam8 expression. The isolated cells were cultured overnight in DMEM:F-12 containing 1% serum, and on the next day cells were treated with Fo/PMA or Fo/AREG for 4 h. At the end of the treatment, the cells were harvested for total RNA isolation and semiquantitative RT-PCR analyses.

Statistics

Results are presented as means ± SD from at least three different experiments. Significant differences between groups were analyzed by ANOVA followed by the Neuman-Keuls test employing GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, CA).

RESULTS

Adam8 mRNA Is Hormonally Regulated and Differentially Expressed in Ovaries of Wild-Type and Pgr Null Mice

To analyze Adam8 expression, total RNA was prepared from whole ovaries of immature mice at specific times prior to and after hormone treatments to stimulate preovulatory follicle development and ovulation. Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that Adam8 mRNA was expressed in ovaries of immature mice and that treatment with eCG did not cause a significant change in Adam8 mRNA levels. Upon administration of an ovulatory dose of hCG, the levels of Adam8 mRNA increased rapidly at 2 h and reached a maximum level by 4 h (Fig. 1A). Adam8 expression remained elevated until 16 h but decreased markedly by 24 h. Changes in the ovarian levels of ADAM8 protein followed a similar expression pattern (Fig. 1B). Western blot analyses of ADAM8 in other tissues typically reveal three immunoreactive bands at 120, 90, and 60 kDa, representing the unprocessed, processed, and remnant forms of the protein, respectively [16]. Identical bands were observed and were found to increase in ovarian samples 4–8 h post-hCG (Figure 1B). Processing of the ~120 kDa proform of ADAM8 by autocatalysis to ~90 kDa is required for proteolytic activity [16], and the ~60 kDa remnant form is abundant in all tissues and cell types that express ADAM8 [15]. {alpha}-Actin and total ERK served as a loading control for the Western blots. No specific bands were observed on Western blot analysis with preimmune serum.


Figure 01
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 1. Regulated expression of Adam8 in ovary. The hormonal regulation Adam8 expression was determined in hormone-primed mice ovaries after administration of eCG (44 h; 4IU) and hCG (5 IU; 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 48 h) as described in Materials and Methods by semiquantitative RT-PCR (A) and Western blot analyses (B). Specifically after eCG and hCG treatments, ovaries were harvested and total RNA were isolated using the TRIzol reagent; 2 µg of the RNA were subjected to reverse transcription employing AMV-RT and radioactive PCR employing P32-labeled dCTP with 2 µl of the cDNA with specific primers for Adam8 and Rpl19 within the linear range of amplification. The products were resolved by 6% acrylamide gel and assessed by autoradiography/phosphorimaging. Total ovarian protein was extracted using urea-Triton buffer with protease inhibitors. Twenty micrograms of the protein was resolved in a SDS-PAGE for Western blot analyses with rabbit polyclonal antibodies for ADAM8 at a dilution of 1:1000. The immunoreactive bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescent system. The same blot was also probed with {alpha}-actin antibody (loading control). Total ERK antibody (loading control) or preimmune serum was also used to probe the same protein extracts on separate Western blots. The proteolytically active, processed form of the ADAM8 (~90 kDa) was quantitated from three different blots and represented in the form of a graph (***P < 0.001, Imm vs. eCG, hCG, 4 or 8 h).

In situ hybridization confirmed induction of Adam8 mRNA at 8 h post-hCG and localized its expression to granulosa cells of preovulatory follicles. Little or no signal was observed in eCG-treated ovaries (Fig. 2A, upper left). To verify and quantify Adam8 expression, semiquantitative RT-PCR analyses were carried out using RNA prepared from granulosa cells and COCs isolated at different time intervals after eCG-hCG treatment. The results confirmed that induced expression of Adam8 mRNA occurred in granulosa cells and COCs 8 h after hCG treatment (Fig. 2B). The expression of Adam8 mRNA was also analyzed in ovaries of Pgr null mice that exhibit an anovulatory phenotype. RT-PCR analyses of total RNA samples prepared from Pgr null homozygote (–/–) and heterozygote (+/–) mouse ovaries at 8, 12, and 16 h after hCG treatment documented significantly reduced levels of Adam8 mRNA in PRKO samples compared to samples from heterozygote at 8 and 12 h but not at 16 h (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, the decline in Adam8 mRNA at 8 h post-hCG correlated with the decrease in number of Pgr alleles (Fig. 3B) relative to wild type mice.


Figure 02
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 2. Expression of Adam8 in granulosa cells and COCs. The spatiotemporal expression of Adam8 was determined by in situ hybridization (A) in ovarian sections (S An, small antral follicle; PO, preovulatory follicle) and RT-PCR analyses (B). Ovarian paraffin sections obtained from hormone-primed mice ovaries were assessed for Adam8 mRNA expression employing a specific riboprobe generated by RT-PCR. Granulosa cells were isolated from ovaries of eCG- and hCG-treated mice, or whole ovarian samples were collected (24-h post-hCG). COCs were collected from the ovary or oviduct (16 and 24 h) to determine Adam8 expression after hormone treatment. Total RNA was extracted and subjected to RT-PCR analysis. The products were resolved in a 6% acrylamide gel and quantified by phosphorimaging (R, residual ovarian tissue). Duplicates of triplicate RT-PCR reaction products per treatment are shown. (***P < 0.001, eCG vs. eCG, hCG, 8 h.)


Figure 03
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 3. Reduced expression Adam8 in PRKO mice. The expression of Adam8 mRNA in PRKO mice was determined by RT-PCR. Immature Pgr null heterozygotes (Het+/–) and homozygotes (PRKO–/–) were treated with eCG and hCG as described in Material and Methods. A) Ovaries were harvested at indicated time points (eCG, hCG: 8, 12, and 16 h) for RNA extraction, and the relative expression of Adam8 mRNA in these samples was determined; shown are duplicates of triplicate or triplicate RT-PCR reaction products per treatment. B) The relative expression of Adam8 in wild-type (WT +/+), Het (+/–), and PRKO (–/–) mice is represented in the form a bar graph that shows the loss of Pgr in each allele (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).

Expression of Adam8 Is Induced in Granulosa Cells from Preantral Follicle Culture upon Stimulation by hCG and EGF

To further examine the control of Adam8 expression in periovulatory follicles, a follicle culture system was used (Fig. 4A). Preantral follicles with two to three layers of granulosa cells (100–130 µm diameter) were manually dissected from the ovaries of prepubertal mice and cultured for 12 days in the presence of rFSH to promote follicle and oocyte growth, antrum formation, and granulosa cell differentiation in vitro. At Day 12, medium was replenished, and in vitro ovulation was induced by rhCG and rEGF. Within 18 h of culture to Day 13, the majority (on average >95%) of the antral follicles undergo in vitro ovulation. Granulosa cells were harvested to analyze expression of Adam8 by RT-PCR prior to (0 h) and following (4 and 18 h) follicle exposure to rhCG/rEGF (Fig. 4H). There was a low level of expression at Day 12. The relative abundance of transcript increased dramatically at 4 h and remained high at 18 h after stimulation of in vitro ovulation by rhCG/rEGF. Expression was also compared between the 18 h rhCG/rEGF-stimulated follicles cultured in the absence or presence of 10 µM AG1478 (EGFR inhibitor) or 1 µM RU486 (PGR inhibitor) (Fig. 5A) or stimulated by 100 ng/ml epiregulin instead of rhCG/rEGF (Fig. 5B). AG1478 as well as RU486 significantly reduced the expression of Adam8 mRNA whereas the relative abundance of message was significantly increased over the rhCG/rEGF controls by stimulation with epiregulin.


Figure 04
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 4. Induction of Adam8 mRNA in granulosa cells of preantral follicle culture stimulated by hCG and EGF for in vitro ovulation. Preantral follicle culture (A) starting with follicles with two to three layers of granulosa cells, a basal membrane, and some theca cells that are isolated and cultured in medium with rFSH and rLH. After attachment (Day 1; B), granulosa cells proliferate (Day 4; C) and differentiate into cumulus (arrowhead) and mural granulosa cells (Day 8; D). They form follicles with antral-like cavities (white arrow; Day 12; E) when cultured in medium containing rFSH. On Day 12, oocytes still contain a GV (black arrow; e), but 4 h after replenishment of medium with rhCG and rEGF (F), germinal vesicle breakdown occurs (f). Eighteen hours after stimulation (Day 12 + 18 h, corresponding to Day 13 of culture; G) of in vitro ovulation, a PB oocyte within the expanded COC is found (g) (ZP: zona pellucida). H) Total RNA was isolated at 0, 4, and 18 h after the rEGF/rhCG treatment to determine the expression of Adam8 by RT-PCR. Rpl7 expression analysis by RT-PCR served as an internal control. Bar = 50 µm (AC and eg); 100 µm (DG).


Figure 05
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 5. Influence of inhibition of EGFR or PGR signaling or epiregulin on expression of Adam8 in granulosa mouse cells during ovulation in vitro. The regulatory role of PGR- and EGF-like growth factors in induction of Adam8 in follicle culture was determined by treatment with 10 µM AG1478 or 1 µM RU486 for the last 18 h with rhCG/EGF. A) At the end of the incubation period, total RNA was isolated and Adam8 expression was determined by RT-PCR. Similarly, the role of EGF-like growth factor in the expression of Adam8 was determined by the treatment of follicle cultures with 100 ng/ml epiregulin or rhCG/rEGF at the last 18 h. B) At 18 h after treatment, RNA was isolated and expression of Adam8 was determined by RT-PCR. (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.)

Hormonal Regulation of the Adam8 Promoter Activity in Granulosa Cells Depends on Multiple Promoter Elements

To understand the transcriptional regulation of Adam8, we confirmed the role of LH signaling in induction of Adam8 mRNA by the addition of Fo/PMA or Fo/AREG to primary granulosa cell cultures. Treatment of primary mouse granulosa cells with Fo/PMA for 4 h induced the Adam8 expression 4–6 fold over the basal levels (Fig. 6A). AREG (100 ng/ml) increased the expression of Adam8 ~1.4 fold. However, when AREG was combined with Fo, Adam 8 mRNA levels were increased 3–4 fold over basal levels (Fig. 6B).


Figure 06
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 6. Induction of Adam8 mRNA in primary mouse granulosa cells in response to Fo and PMA treatment. The role of LH and EGF signaling in induction of Adam8 in primary mouse granulosa cells were determined by treatment with Fo/PMA (A) and Fo/AREG or AREG alone (B). The cells were treated with the agonists for 4 h, and total RNA was isolated to determine the Adam8 induction by a nonradioactive semiquantitative RT-PCR. Amplification of Rpl19 served as an internal control. The products were resolved in a 2% agarose gel and the relative induction of Adam8 in these reactions was quantitated by gel documentation system. (***P < 0.001, control (Con) vs. Fo/PMA and Con vs. Fo/AREG.)

To further determine the molecular mechanisms by which Adam8 is induced in granulosa cells, mouse Adam8 promoter-luciferase constructs were generated based on a previous study by Kataoka et al. [30]; they documented that ~1 kb of the Adam8 promoter contained the sites that are necessary to confer lipopolysaccharide and interferon-{gamma} inducibility. In addition, their studies determined the transcription start site and predicted several putative transcription factor binding sites. Therefore, we cloned 1 kb (–1065/+50) of the murine Adam8 promoter along with 50 bases of exon I. Based on the predicted transcription factor binding sites [30], we also cloned shorter constructs (–615/+50, –240/+50, and –106/+50) by a PCR-based approach. Each promoter fragment was subcloned into pGL3-luciferase reporter constructs. Transfection assays were carried out in primary rat granulosa cells (that can be easily transfected but lack LH-receptor) to determine the inducibility of the promoter by Fo/PMA. The –240 Adam8 promoter-luc construct exhibited the highest basal activity as well as the greatest inducible (15–20 fold) activity (Fig. 7A) that decreased with deletion to –106 Adam8-luc. These results indicated that the –240/+50 region of the promoter contained elements that are critical for the inducibility of the promoter whereas the regions distal to it have putative repressor elements. All the promoter regions were responsive to Fo, PMA, or Fo/PMA, with the latter showing an additive effect for the –106 Adam8 promoter-luc construct (Fig. 7B). Thus, the –106 Adam8 promoter-luc construct appeared to contain the minimal elements that are required for Fo/PMA-induced activation of the promoter.


Figure 07
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 7. Induction of Adam8 promoter in response Fo/PMA or Fo/AREG treatment and cotransfection of PGR-A. The hormones responsiveness and the functional regions that are critical for Adam8 promoter induction were determined by cloning different lengths of promoter regions by PCR approaches into pGL3 vector that extend from –1065, –615, –240, and –106 to +50 relative to the transcription start site (+1). The cloned promoter constructs (500 ng) were transfected into primary rat granulosa cells with Fugene 6 to determine their inducibility in response to Fo, PMA, and Fo/PMA. A) Specifically, the cells were transfected overnight and treated with Fo, PMA or Fo/PMA (FP) for 4 h, lysed, and extracted to determine the luciferase activity. The values were expressed as light-specific units (LSU) per µg of protein. B) In addition, the cells were cotransfected with empty vector pSCT or pSCT-PGR-A expression construct (10 ng) to determine the role of PGR in regulation of the inducibility of the construct under basal and Fo/PMA-treated conditions. C) Similarly, the inducibility of the promoter in response to AREG, Fo, or both was also determined. (*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, Fo and Fo/PMA, respectively, between the empty vector and PGR-A transfected treatments.)

Adam8 expression is reduced in ovaries of the Pgr null mice, indicating that it is regulated in part by PGR. Therefore, a PGR-A expression vector was cotransfected with the –106 Adam8-luc promoter construct in granulosa cells. Expression of PGR-A increased the basal, Fo, PMA, and Fo/PMA inducibility 2–3 fold compared to the empty vector controls showing a stimulatory role of PGR for induction of this gene (Fig. 7B). Similar results were obtained with cotransfection of PGR-A and –240 Adam8-luc promoter-reporter construct (data now shown). AREG (100 ng/ml) alone also consistently increased –106 Adam8-luc promoter activity ~1.7 fold over the basal levels and exerted an additive effect when combined with Fo (~14 fold) (Fig. 7C). A similar trend of induction was observed with the –240 Adam8-luc promoter-reporter construct on AREG or Fo treatment (data now shown).

Multiple Regions of the Adam8 Promoter Are Critical for Its Inducibility in Granulosa Cells

Our previous studies with PGR target genes, namely, Adamts1 and Ctsl, documented that GC-rich Sp1/Sp3 binding sites are critical for mediating Fo/PMA and PGR effects [3, 31]. Therefore, when computer analyses of the Adam8 promoter identified the presence of three GC boxes—II, III, and IV (–296, –277, and –231, respectively)—within the –615 to –220 region (Fig. 8A), these GC boxes were mutated to generate a triple mutant in the –615/+50 version of the Adam8 promoter. However, these mutations did not alter the basal and Fo/PMA inducibility of the promoter (Fig. 8B). Since the region extending between the –106 bp and the transcription start site was enough to confer Fo/PMA responsiveness, we reasoned that this region might contain the key regulatory sites for the induction of the promoter. Studies by Katoaka et al. [30] predicted the presence of binding sites for NF-1 and IRF-1 as well as a TATA box in this regions (Fig. 8B); however the interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) site did not match with the IRF-1 consensus sequence [32]. In addition to the above-mentioned sites, we noted another GC box adjacent to the putative NF-1 site in the proximal promoter (GC box I; Fig, 8, A and B). The GC box I (GGAGG) is identical to SP1/SP3 binding sites found in the promoters of the Pgr and Adamts1 genes [28, 31] (Fig. 8C). Mutation of the GC box I and TATA box individually did not alter the basal or Fo/PMA inducibility of the promoter; however, a double mutant that disrupted the GC box I and TATA box exhibited ~25% reduction in basal and Fo/PMA inducibility of the promoter (Fig. 8B). Mutation of NF-1 site reduced the inducibility of the promoter by ~25%. Subsequently, when all three sites (GC box I, NF-1, and TATA) were mutated, the basal and Fo/PMA response declined by more than 75% (Fig. 8B). Thus, transcription activation of Adam8 is uniquely regulated by a combinatorial set of factors distinct from other LH- and PGR-regulated genes that are primarily regulated by SP1/SP3 [33].


Figure 08
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 8. Determination of cis-acting elements that mediate Fo/PMA induction of Adam8 promoter. A) Adam8 promoter DNA sequence representing the transcription start site and the putative transcription factor binding sites in the promoter. B) The critical region of Adam8 promoter that confers Fo/PMA (FP) inducibility within the –106/+50 region was determined by site-directed mutagenesis employing the editor kit. GC box I, NF-1 site, and TATA boxes were mutated individually. In addition, GC box I–TATA box double mutant and GC box I–NF-1 site–TATA box triple mutant were generated. The mutants were confirmed by sequencing and transfected (500 ng) into primary rat granulosa cells employing Fugene 6 to determine the Fo/PMA inducibility compared to the wild type (Wt) controls as described earlier. (*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001; analyzed between Wt and mutants.) C) Sequence alignment of Sp1 sites in Adamts1, Pgr, and Adam8 (GC box I) promoter aligned to the consensus Sp1/Sp3 binding sequence.

DISCUSSION

Our results document for the first time that the metalloprotease ADAM8 is expressed in granulosa cells of small follicles and is selectively increased in cumulus cells and granulosa cells of preovulatory follicles of the murine ovary. Specifically, Adam8 mRNA is induced in vivo by the ovulatory surge of LH/hCG. The effects of LH appear to be mediated, in part, by its ability to induce PGR and EGF-like growth factors [34, 35]. In mice null for Pgr, the levels of Adam8 mRNA were reduced markedly prior to ovulation and at 8 and 12 h post-hCG, but not following ovulation at 16 h, indicating that Adam8 is present in granulosa cells but is reduced as the cells luteinize.

As observed in vivo, low levels of Adam8 mRNA were detected in murine granulosa cells of periovulatory follicles from preantral follicle culture. Likewise, within 4 h after the addition of rhCG/rEGF on Day 12 (to mimic the LH surge in vivo), there was a dramatic increase in Adam8 mRNA levels, and these high levels persisted until 18 h, when in vitro ovulation occurred. Moreover, as observed in the Pgr null mice, a PGR inhibitor reduced Adam8 mRNA in granulosa cells from antral follicles cultured in the presence of rhCG/rEGF. Lastly, the positive effects of epiregulin and the inhibitory effects of EGFR blockers on Adam8 expression in the in vitro ovulation model support the notion that the EGFR pathway affect the expression of this protease both in vitro and in vivo. However, the fact that AREG alone did not markedly induce Adam8 in primary murine or rat granulosa cell cultures indicates that the follicle milieu provides additional critical regulatory molecules.

Analyses of Adam8 promoter-luciferase constructs provided additional support that factors downstream of LH, including PGR and EGF-like factors, regulate transcription of the Adam8 gene in vivo. Specifically, transient transfection analyses of various promoter regions from –1 to 0.1 kb were responsive to Fo/PMA, suggesting that this minimal region is sufficient to confer PRG, AREG, and Fo/PMA responsiveness in mammalian granulosa cells. Since many of the genes that are induced during the periovulatory period, including Pgr [28], Sgk1 [36], Ctsl [3], Egr1 [37], Adamts1 [31], and Areg [38], have SP1/SP3 sites that are critical for induction, we originally predicted that a triple mutant of the three GC boxes at –296, –277, and –231bp in Adam8 promoter would abolish promoter activity. However, mutation of these GC boxes did not alter the basal or Fo/PMA inducibility of the Adam8 promoter. Within the 100 bp region, the predicted IRF-1 site [30] did not match with reported consensus AANNGAA [32]; hence, we focused on the NF-1 and TATA site. Mutation of the putative NF-1 site alone reduced the Fo/PMA inducibility of the promoter, suggesting that NF-1 or an NF-1-like factor [31] may be involved. The Adam8 promoter TATA box (TATAGAG) did not match the consensus TATA box TATA(A/T)A(A/T) [39], suggesting that the Adam8 TATA is an unusual or weak TATA box. Moreover, mutation of the TATA box alone did not alter the Fo/PMA inducibility of the promoter. Although the GC box (I) had a consensus SP1/SP3 site binding sequence similar to that characterized in the Pgr and Adamts1 promoters [28, 31], mutation of this region alone also did not alter Adam8 promoter activity (Fig. 8B). However, a double mutation of GC box I and the TATA box and a triple mutant (GC box I, NF-1 site, and TATA) reduced basal and agonist-regulated Adam8 promoter activity 20% and 80%, respectively. Thus, transcription factors binding to these three regions exert a cooperative effect, and any two of the three sites appear sufficient for Adam8 promoter activation. In conclusion, the interaction of PGR with NF-1 and/or SP1/SP3 in these regions of the Adam8 promoter provides a novel regulatory mechanism of induction of a gene in the metzincin family in addition to that observed with the Adamts1 promoter [31].

Although the precise function of ADAM8 in the ovary remains to be determined, its expression in the embryonic gonad [40, 41] and its induction in periovulatory follicles in vivo and in vitro as well as in the proestrous uterus [42] indicate that ADAM8 may have more than one function in the developing ovarian follicles and in fertility. As a metalloprotease, ADAM8 could influence the ovulatory process by modifying the extracellular matrix. Specifically within the follicle, ADAM8 may be critical for the proteolytic release of matrix-associated factors (ectodomain shedding) [12, 13, 43] involved in the expansion of the cumulus oocyte complex and cell migration, which would be similar to its activities in glioma cells [19]. Ectodomain shedding that causes the release of EGF-like growth factors from the matrix following LH surge may also facilitate LH action during ovulation [35]. Preliminary studies document the expression of FCER2 (CD23) and CHL1, known substrates of ADAM8, in the ovary (data now shown). Cumulus cells of COCs have been shown to express genes that are highly relevant to neuronal and immune function, including MBP, another known ADAM8 substrate [44]. Since MBP is known to stabilize membrane structures [45], cleavage of MBP by ADAM8 may alter cumulus cell functions. Despite these putative roles for ADAM8, mice null for Adam8 do not exhibit an overt anovulatory phenotype and are fertile, possibly because of potential functional redundancies with many other proteases expressed and/or activated during ovulation. Collectively, our results document for the first time that Adam8 is expressed in granulosa cells of primary/small preantral follicles within the adult murine ovary and is induced selectively in granulosa/cumulus cells during the periovulatory period in vivo and in culture by the combinatorial effects of LH, PGR, and EGF-like factors. To our knowledge ADAM8 is the first member of the ADAM family that has been shown to be hormonally regulated.

FOOTNOTES

1Supported by NIH grants HD16229 and HD07495 (SCCPIR) (J.S.R.) and by the King's College (J.W.B.). V.S. is supported in part by the NICHD and Office of Research on Women's Health as a Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health Scholar K12HD052023 and ASRM/Organon grant. Back

Correspondence: 2Venkataraman Sriraman, Department of Internal Medicine,3 Division of Endocrinology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555. FAX: 409 772 8709; e-mail: vesriram{at}utmb.edu

Received: 25 October 2007.

First decision: 5 November 2007.

Accepted: 1 February 2008.

REFERENCES

  1. Richards JS, Russell DL, Ochsner S, Espey LL. Ovulation: new dimensions and new regulators of the inflammatory-like response. Annu Rev Physiol 2002; 64:69–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Richards JS, Russell DL, Ochsner S, Hsieh M, Doyle KH, Falender AE, Lo YK, Sharma SC. Novel signaling pathways that control ovarian follicular development, ovulation, and luteinization. Recent Prog Horm Res 2002; 57:195–220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sriraman V, Richards JS. Cathepsin L gene expression and promoter activation in rodent granulosa cells. Endocrinology 2004; 145:582–591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Oksjoki S, Soderstrom M, Vuorio E, Anttila L. Differential expression patterns of cathepsins B, H, K, L and S in the mouse ovary. Mol Hum Reprod 2001; 7:27–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Richards JS, Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Robayna I, Teuling E, Lo Y, Boerboom D, Falender AE, Doyle KH, LeBaron RG, Thompson V, Sandy JD. Regulated expression of ADAMTS family members in follicles and cumulus oocyte complexes: evidence for specific and redundant patterns during ovulation. Biol Reprod 2005; 72:1241–1255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Liu K, Wahlberg P, Leonardsson G, Hagglund AC, Ny A, Boden I, Wibom C, Lund LR, Ny T. Successful ovulation in plasminogen-deficient mice treated with the broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor galardin. Dev Biol 2006; 295:615–622.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Pall M, Mikuni M, Mitsube K, Brannstrom M. Time-dependent ovulation inhibition of a selective progesterone-receptor antagonist (Org 31710) and effects on ovulatory mediators in the in vitro perfused rat ovary. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:1642–1647.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Funk CR, Mani SK, Hughes AR, Montgomery CA Jr, Shyamala G, Conneely OM, O'Malley BW. Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit pleiotropic reproductive abnormalities. Genes Dev 1995; 9:2266–2278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Robker RL, Russell DL, Espey LL, Lydon JP, O'Malley BW, Richards JS. Progesterone-regulated genes in the ovulation process: ADAMTS-1 and cathepsin L proteases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:4689–4694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Shimada M, Nishibori M, Yamashita Y, Ito J, Mori T, Richards JS. Down-regulated expression of A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin-like repeats-1 by progesterone receptor antagonist is associated with impaired expansion of porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes. Endocrinology 2004; 145:4603–4614.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Shindo T, Kurihara H, Kuno K, Yokoyama H, Wada T, Kurihara Y, Imai T, Wang Y, Ogata M, Nishimatsu H, Moriyama N, Oh-hashi Y, Morita H, Ishikawa T, Nagai R, Yazaki Y, Matsushima K. ADAMTS-1: a metalloproteinase-disintegrin essential for normal growth, fertility, and organ morphology and function. J Clin Invest 2000; 105:1345–1352.[Medline]
  12. Wolfsberg TG, Primakoff P, Myles DG, White JM. ADAM, a novel family of membrane proteins containing A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease domain: multipotential functions in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. J Cell Biol 1995; 131:275–278.[Free Full Text]
  13. Yamamoto S, Higuchi Y, Yoshiyama K, Shimizu E, Kataoka M, Hijiya N, Matsuura K. ADAM family proteins in the immune system. Immunol Today 1999; 20:278–284.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Yoshida S, Setoguchi M, Higuchi Y, Akizuki S, Yamamoto S. Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding MS2 antigen, a novel cell surface antigen strongly expressed in murine monocytic lineage. Int Immunol 1990; 2:585–591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Schlomann U, Rathke-Hartlieb S, Yamamoto S, Jockusch H, Bartsch JW. Tumor necrosis factor alpha induces a metalloprotease-disintegrin, ADAM8 (CD 156): implications for neuron-glia interactions during neurodegeneration. J Neurosci 2000; 20:7964–7971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Schlomann U, Wildeboer D, Webster A, Antropova O, Zeuschner D, Knight CG, Docherty AJ, Lambert M, Skelton L, Jockusch H, Bartsch JW. The metalloprotease disintegrin ADAM8. Processing by autocatalysis is required for proteolytic activity and cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:48210–48219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Naus S, Reipschlager S, Wildeboer D, Lichtenthaler SF, Mitterreiter S, Guan Z, Moss ML, Bartsch JW. Identification of candidate substrates for ectodomain shedding by the metalloprotease-disintegrin ADAM8. Biol Chem 2006; 387:337–346.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Naus S, Richter M, Wildeboer D, Moss M, Schachner M, Bartsch JW. Ectodomain shedding of the neural recognition molecule CHL1 by the metalloprotease-disintegrin ADAM8 promotes neurite outgrowth and suppresses neuronal cell death. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:16083–16090.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wildeboer D, Naus S, Amy Sang QX, Bartsch JW, Pagenstecher A. Metalloproteinase disintegrins ADAM8 and ADAM19 are highly regulated in human primary brain tumors and their expression levels and activities are associated with invasiveness. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2006; 65:516–527.[Medline]
  20. Sriraman V, Rudd MD, Lohmann SM, Mulders SM, Richards JS. Cyclic guanosine 5'-monophosphate-dependent protein kinase II is induced by luteinizing hormone and progesterone receptor-dependent mechanisms in granulosa cells and cumulus oocyte complexes of ovulating follicles. Mol Endocrinol 2006; 20:348–361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Russell DL, Doyle KM, Ochsner SA, Sandy JD, Richards JS. Processing and localization of ADAMTS-1 and proteolytic cleavage of versican during cumulus matrix expansion and ovulation. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:42330–42339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Cortvrindt RG, Smitz JE. Follicle culture in reproductive toxicology: a tool for in-vitro testing of ovarian function? Hum Reprod Update 2002; 8:243–254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sun F, Betzendahl I, Shen Y, Cortvrindt R, Smitz J, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Preantral follicle culture as a novel in vitro assay in reproductive toxicology testing in mammalian oocytes. Mutagenesis 2004; 19:13–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Van Wemmel K, Gobbers E, Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Smitz J, Cortvrindt R. Ovarian follicle bioassay reveals adverse effects of diazepam exposure upon follicle development and oocyte quality. Reprod Toxicol 2005; 20:183–193.[Medline]
  25. Smitz J, Cortvrindt R, Van Steirteghem AC. Normal oxygen atmosphere is essential for the solitary long-term culture of early preantral mouse follicles. Mol Reprod Dev 1996; 45:466–475.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Pedersen T, Peters H. Proposal for a classification of oocytes and follicles in the mouse ovary. J Reprod Fertil 1968; 17:555–557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Morris JK, Richards JS. Hormone induction of luteinization and prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 involves multiple cellular signaling pathways. Endocrinology 1993; 133:770–779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sriraman V, Sharma SC, Richards JS. Transactivation of the progesterone receptor gene in granulosa cells: evidence that Sp1/Sp3 binding sites in the proximal promoter play a key role in luteinizing hormone inducibility. Mol Endocrinol 2003; 17:436–449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sharma SC, Clemens JW, Pisarska MD, Richards JS. Expression and function of estrogen receptor subtypes in granulosa cells: regulation by estradiol and forskolin. Endocrinology 1999; 140:4320–4334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kataoka M, Yoshiyama K, Matsuura K, Hijiya N, Higuchi Y, Yamamoto S. Structure of the murine CD156 gene, characterization of its promoter, and chromosomal location. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:18209–18215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Doyle KM, Russell DL, Sriraman V, Richards JS. Coordinate transcription of the ADAMTS-1 gene by luteinizing hormone and progesterone receptor. Mol Endocrinol 2004; 18:2463–2478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Fujii Y, Shimizu T, Kusumoto M, Kyogoku Y, Taniguchi T, Hakoshima T. Crystal structure of an IRF-DNA complex reveals novel DNA recognition and cooperative binding to a tandem repeat of core sequences. EMBO J 1999; 18:5028–5041.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Sriraman V, Richards JS. Sp1: A critical transcription factor of ovulation-related genes?. Biol Reprod 2003; 68:229.
  34. Natraj U, Richards JS. Hormonal regulation, localization, and functional activity of the progesterone receptor in granulosa cells of rat preovulatory follicles. Endocrinology 1993; 133:761–769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Park JY, Su YQ, Ariga M, Law E, Jin SL, Conti M. EGF-like growth factors as mediators of LH action in the ovulatory follicle. Science 2004; 303:682–684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Alliston TN, Maiyar AC, Buse P, Firestone GL, Richards JS. Follicle stimulating hormone-regulated expression of serum/glucocorticoid-inducible kinase in rat ovarian granulosa cells: a functional role for the Sp1 family in promoter activity. Mol Endocrinol 1997; 11:1934–1949.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Russell DL, Doyle KM, Gonzales-Robayna I, Pipaon C, Richards JS. Egr-1 induction in rat granulosa cells by follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone: combinatorial regulation by transcription factors cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate regulatory element binding protein, serum response factor, sp1, and early growth response factor-1. Mol Endocrinol 2003; 17:520–533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Shao J, Evers BM, Sheng H. Prostaglandin E2 synergistically enhances receptor tyrosine kinase-dependent signaling system in colon cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:14287–14293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Babenko VN, Kosarev PS, Vishnevsky OV, Levitsky VG, Basin VV, Frolov AS. Investigating extended regulatory regions of genomic DNA sequences. Bioinformatics 1999; 15:644–653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Coveney D, Ross AJ, Slone JD, Capel B. A microarray analysis of the XX Wnt4 mutant gonad targeted at the identification of genes involved in testis vascular differentiation. Gene Expr Patterns 2007; 7:82–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Kelly K, Hutchinson G, Nebenius-Oosthuizen D, Smith AJ, Bartsch JW, Horiuchi K, Rittger A, Manova K, Docherty AJ, Blobel CP. Metalloprotease-disintegrin ADAM8: expression analysis and targeted deletion in mice. Dev Dyn 2005; 232:221–231.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Kim J, Kim H, Lee SJ, Choi YM, Lee SJ, Lee JY. Abundance of ADAM-8, -9, -10, -12, -15 and -17 and ADAMTS-1 in mouse uterus during the oestrous cycle. Reprod Fertil Dev 2005; 17:543–555.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Schlondorff J, Becherer JD, Blobel CP. Intracellular maturation and localization of the tumour necrosis factor alpha convertase (TACE). Biochem J 2000; 347Pt 1:131–138.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Robayna I, Shimada M, Wayne CM, Ochsner SA, White L, Richards JS. Gene expression profiles of cumulus cell oocyte complexes during ovulation reveal cumulus cells express neuronal and immune-related genes: does this expand their role in the ovulation process? Mol Endocrinol 2006; 20:1300–1321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. DeBruin LS, Haines JD, Wellhauser LA, Radeva G, Schonmann V, Bienzle D, Harauz G. Developmental partitioning of myelin basic protein into membrane microdomains. J Neurosci Res 2005; 80:211–225.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Kim, I. C. Bagchi, and M. K. Bagchi
Signaling by Hypoxia-Inducible Factors Is Critical for Ovulation In Mice
Endocrinology, July 1, 2009; 150(7): 3392 - 3400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
78/6/1038    most recent
biolreprod.107.066340v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sriraman, V.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sriraman, V.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sriraman, V.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS