Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 14, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008201
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/1/159    most recent
biolreprod.102.008201v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiendleder, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hiendleder, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hiendleder, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, E.
Submitted June 7, 2002
Returned for revision June 26, 2002
Accepted July 16, 2002

Reproductive Technology


Heteroplasmy in Bovine Fetuses Produced by Intra- and Inter-Subspecific Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer: Neutral Segregation of Nuclear Donor Mitochondrial DNA in Various Tissues and Evidence for Recipient Cow Mitochondria in Fetal Blood

Stefan Hiendleder 1*, Valeri Zakhartchenko 2, Hendrik Wenigerkind 3, Horst-Dieter Reichenbach 4, Katja Brüggerhoff 2, Katja Prelle 2, Gottfried Brem 5, Miodrag Stojkovic 2, Eckhard Wolf 6
1 Ludwig-Maximilians University and Justus-Liebig University
2 Ludwig-Maximilians University
3 Bavarian Research Center for Biology of Reproduction (BFZF), Badersfeld
4 Bavarian Research Station for Animal Breeding, Grub
5 Agrobiogen GmbH
6 Ludwig-Maximilians University and BFZF

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.hiendleder{at}gen.vetmed.unimuenchen.de.

Abstract

Varying degrees of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) heteroplasmy have been observed in nuclear transfer embryos, fetuses and offspring, but the mechanisms leading to this condition are unknown. We have generated a clone of 12 bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer fetuses, using nuclear donor cells, recipient oocytes and recipient heifers with defined mtDNA genotypes, to study nuclear- mitochondrial interactions and the origins of mtDNA heteroplasmy. Embryos were reconstructed from granulosa cells with Bos taurus mtDNA type A and recipient oocytes collected from three different maternal lineages with B. taurus mtDNA type B, B. taurus mtDNA type C or B. indicus mtDNA. Sequence differences in the control region (CR) of B. taurus mtDNAs ranged from 6-11 nucleotides, differences between B. taurus and B. indicus CRs from 45-50 nucleotides. Fetuses were recovered from recipient heifers with B. taurus mtDNA type B on Day 80 after nuclear transfer (8 B. taurus A/B, 2 B. taurus A/C, 2 B. taurus A/B. indicus). Agarose gel analysis of the CR by polymerase chain reaction based restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) failed to detect nuclear donor mtDNA in 11 investigated tissues of 10 viable fetuses and in DNA samples of two fetuses in resorption (1 B. taurus A/B, 1 B. taurus A/C). A more sensitive analysis of 1801 plasmid clones with CR inserts derived from tissues of a B. taurus A/B. indicus fetus detected no or very low levels of heteroplasmy (0.5-0.7%). However, the analyses detected considerable amounts (~2.5 and 5%) of recipient heifer mtDNA in blood samples from two fetuses. Our data do not suggest a replicative advantage of somatic nuclear donor cell mtDNA in bovine transmitochondrial clones produced with oocytes from domestic forms of the same or a different aurochs (Bos primigenius) subspecies. Detection of mtDNA from the recipient animal in the circulation of two fetuses points to leakage of the placental barrier, mimicking heteroplasmy.



Key words: Embryo • Assisted Reproductive Technology • Pregnancy • Developmental biology • Placenta



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E.C. Spikings, J. Alderson, and J.C.St. John
Transmission of mitochondrial DNA following assisted reproduction and nuclear transfer
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 401 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
V. J. Hall, P. Stojkovic, and M. Stojkovic
Using Therapeutic Cloning to Fight Human Disease: A Conundrum or Reality?
Stem Cells, July 1, 2006; 24(7): 1628 - 1637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y.-H. Sun, S.-P. Chen, Y.-P. Wang, W. Hu, and Z.-Y. Zhu
Cytoplasmic Impact on Cross-Genus Cloned Fish Derived from Transgenic Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Nuclei and Goldfish (Carassius auratus) Enucleated Eggs
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 510 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. C St John, R. E I Lloyd, E. J Bowles, E. C Thomas, and S. El Shourbagy
The consequences of nuclear transfer for mammalian foetal development and offspring survival. A mitochondrial DNA perspective
Reproduction, June 1, 2004; 127(6): 631 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. Hiendleder, K. Prelle, K. Bruggerhoff, H.-D. Reichenbach, H. Wenigerkind, D. Bebbere, M. Stojkovic, S. Muller, G. Brem, V. Zakhartchenko, et al.
Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Interactions Affect In Utero Developmental Capacity, Phenotype, and Cellular Metabolism of Bovine Nuclear Transfer Fetuses
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2004; 70(4): 1196 - 1205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2002 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.