|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Varying degrees of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) heteroplasmy have been observed in nuclear transfer embryos, fetuses and offspring, but the mechanisms leading to this condition are unknown. We have generated a clone of 12 bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer fetuses, using nuclear donor cells, recipient oocytes and recipient heifers with defined mtDNA genotypes, to study nuclear- mitochondrial interactions and the origins of mtDNA heteroplasmy. Embryos were reconstructed from granulosa cells with Bos taurus mtDNA type A and recipient oocytes collected from three different maternal lineages with B. taurus mtDNA type B, B. taurus mtDNA type C or B. indicus mtDNA. Sequence differences in the control region (CR) of B. taurus mtDNAs ranged from 6-11 nucleotides, differences between B. taurus and B. indicus CRs from 45-50 nucleotides. Fetuses were recovered from recipient heifers with B. taurus mtDNA type B on Day 80 after nuclear transfer (8 B. taurus A/B, 2 B. taurus A/C, 2 B. taurus A/B. indicus). Agarose gel analysis of the CR by polymerase chain reaction based restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) failed to detect nuclear donor mtDNA in 11 investigated tissues of 10 viable fetuses and in DNA samples of two fetuses in resorption (1 B. taurus A/B, 1 B. taurus A/C). A more sensitive analysis of 1801 plasmid clones with CR inserts derived from tissues of a B. taurus A/B. indicus fetus detected no or very low levels of heteroplasmy (0.5-0.7%). However, the analyses detected considerable amounts (~2.5 and 5%) of recipient heifer mtDNA in blood samples from two fetuses. Our data do not suggest a replicative advantage of somatic nuclear donor cell mtDNA in bovine transmitochondrial clones produced with oocytes from domestic forms of the same or a different aurochs (Bos primigenius) subspecies. Detection of mtDNA from the recipient animal in the circulation of two fetuses points to leakage of the placental barrier, mimicking heteroplasmy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E.C. Spikings, J. Alderson, and J.C.St. John Transmission of mitochondrial DNA following assisted reproduction and nuclear transfer Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 401 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. J. Hall, P. Stojkovic, and M. Stojkovic Using Therapeutic Cloning to Fight Human Disease: A Conundrum or Reality? Stem Cells, July 1, 2006; 24(7): 1628 - 1637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Sun, S.-P. Chen, Y.-P. Wang, W. Hu, and Z.-Y. Zhu Cytoplasmic Impact on Cross-Genus Cloned Fish Derived from Transgenic Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Nuclei and Goldfish (Carassius auratus) Enucleated Eggs Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 510 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C St John, R. E I Lloyd, E. J Bowles, E. C Thomas, and S. El Shourbagy The consequences of nuclear transfer for mammalian foetal development and offspring survival. A mitochondrial DNA perspective Reproduction, June 1, 2004; 127(6): 631 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hiendleder, K. Prelle, K. Bruggerhoff, H.-D. Reichenbach, H. Wenigerkind, D. Bebbere, M. Stojkovic, S. Muller, G. Brem, V. Zakhartchenko, et al. Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Interactions Affect In Utero Developmental Capacity, Phenotype, and Cellular Metabolism of Bovine Nuclear Transfer Fetuses Biol Reprod, April 1, 2004; 70(4): 1196 - 1205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |