Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print January 7, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.025304
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/5/1340    most recent
biolreprod.103.025304v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robeck, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robeck, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, J. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Robeck, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, J. K.
Submitted November 7, 2003
Returned for revision December 9, 2003
Accepted December 26, 2003

Reproductive Technology


Effect of Cryopreservation Methods and Pre-Cryopreservation Storage on Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) Spermatozoa

T. R. Robeck * and J. K. O'Brien

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: todd.robeck{at}seaworld.com.

Abstract
Research was conducted to develop an effective method for cryopreserving bottlenose dolphin semen processed immediately after collection or after 24 h liquid storage. In each of 2 experiments, 4 ejaculates were collected from 3 males. In Experiment 1, 3 cryopreservation methods (CM1, CM2, CM3), 2 straw sizes (0.25 ml, 0.5 ml), and 3 thawing rates (SLOW, MEDIUM, FAST) were evaluated. Evaluations were conducted at collection, pre-freeze and 0, 3 and 6 h post-thaw. A sperm motility index (SMI: total motility [TM] x % progressive motility [PPM] x kinetic rating [KR, 0 to 5]) was calculated and expressed as %SMI of initial ejaculate. For all ejaculates, initial TM and PPM were greater than 85% and KR was 5. At 0 h post-thaw, differences in %SMI among cryopreservation methods and thaw rates were observed (P < 0.05) but there was no effect of straw size. In Experiment 2, ejaculates were divided into 4 aliquots for dilution (1:1) and storage at 4°C with a skim milk-glucose or a TES-TRIS egg yolk solution, and at 21°C with a HEPES-TALP medium or no dilution. After 24 h, samples were frozen and thawed (CM3, 0.5 ml straws, FAST thawing rate) at 20 x 106 spermatozoa ml-1 (LOW) or 100 x 106 spermatozoa ml-1 (STD). Percent SMI at 0 h post-thaw was higher for samples stored at 4°C than 21°C (P < 0.001), and at 6 h post-thaw, %SMI was higher for samples frozen at STD than LOW concentration (P < 0.05). For both experiments, acrosome integrity was similar across treatments. In summary, a semen cryopreservation protocol applied to fresh or liquid-stored semen maintained high levels of initial ejaculate sperm characteristics.

Key words: Gamete Biology • Assisted Reproductive Technology • Testis • Male sexual function • Sperm


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. Robeck, K. Steinman, M Yoshioka, E Jensen, J. O'Brien, E Katsumata, C Gili, J. McBain, J Sweeney, and S. Monfort
Estrous cycle characterisation and artificial insemination using frozen-thawed spermatozoa in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)
Reproduction, May 1, 2005; 129(5): 659 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T.R. Robeck, K.J. Steinman, S. Gearhart, T.R. Reidarson, J.F. McBain, and S.L. Monfort
Reproductive Physiology and Development of Artificial Insemination Technology in Killer Whales (Orcinus orca)
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2004; 71(2): 650 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.