|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract
Selection of blastocysts based on their morphological
characteristics, and the rate of development in vitro can
skew the sex ratios. This study aims to determine whether
an embryo's developmental rate affects its survival after
vitrification, and whether male and female embryos survive
vitrification differently. In vitro fertilized bovine
oocytes were cultured in KSOM + 0.1% BSA for 96 h, and
then into KSOM + 1% BSA (KSOM) or in sequential KSOM +
0.1% BSA for 96 h, and then into SOF + 5% FBS (KSOM-SOF).
In part 1 of this study, embryos cultured in each medium
that had developed into blastocysts at approximately 144,
156, or 180 h were recovered from culture, graded, and
they were vitrified. After warming, blastocyst survival
rates were immediately evaluated by re-expansion of the
blastocoels. In the second part of this study, all
blastocysts (n=191) were sexed by PCR 48 h post-warming.
When cultured in KSOM medium, more 144 h blastocysts
survived vitrification (68%) than blastocysts vitrified at
180 h (49%). Blastocysts derived at 156 h in KSOM-SOF
survived vitrification better (87%) than blastocysts
vitrified at either 144 h or 180 h, and subsequently
hatched at a greater rate than those vitrified at 180 h.
The overall blastocyst survival rates did not differ
significantly whether embryos were cultured in KSOM or
sequential KSOM-SOF. Blastocysts derived at 144 and 156 h
in KSOM or KSOM-SOF were predominately male, and
significantly more of them survived vitrification 48 h
post-warming. However, blastocysts cultured in KSOM-SOF,
and then vitrified at 180 h were predominately female.
Overall, blastocysts that survived vitrification, and
subsequently hatched 48 h post-warming, were male. In
summary, embryos that reached the blastocyst stage earlier
were predominantly males; these males have better
morphology, endured vitrification, and subsequently
hatched at a greater rate than did female blastocysts.
Key words:
Embryo
Assisted Reproductive Technology
Early development
Fertilization
In vitro fertilization
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Bermejo-Alvarez, D. Rizos, D. Rath, P. Lonergan, and A. Gutierrez-Adan Epigenetic differences between male and female bovine blastocysts produced in vitro Physiol Genomics, January 17, 2008; 32(2): 264 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Smith, R. E. Everts, X. C. Tian, F. Du, L.-Y. Sung, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, B.-S. Jeong, J.-P. Renard, H. A. Lewin, and X. Yang Global gene expression profiles reveal significant nuclear reprogramming by the blastocyst stage after cloning PNAS, December 6, 2005; 102(49): 17582 - 17587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |