Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print March 1, 2006.
Biol Reprod 2006, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.039370
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
74/6/1114    most recent
biolreprod.104.039370v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skrzyszowska, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pienkowski, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skrzyszowska, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pienkowski, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Skrzyszowska, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pienkowski, M.
Submitted December 21, 2004
Returned for revision January 16, 2005
Accepted March 1, 2006

Reproductive Technology


Generation of Transgenic Rabbits by the Novel Technique of Chimeric Somatic Cell Cloning

M. Skrzyszowska *, Z. Smorag , R. Slomski , L. Katska-Ksiazkiewicz , R. Kalak , E. Michalak , K. Wielgus , J. Lehmann , D. Lipinski , M. Szalata , A. Plawski , M. Samiec , J. Jura , B. Gajda , B. Rynska , and M. Pienkowski

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mskrzysz{at}izoo.krakow.pl.

Abstract
A novel technique of chimeric somatic cell cloning was applied for production of a transgenic rabbit (NT20). The karyoplasts of transgenic adult skin fibroblasts with Tg(Wap-GH1) gene construct as a marker were microsurgically transferred into one, previously enucleated, blastomere of two-cell non-transgenic embryos, while the second one remained intact. The reconstructed embryos were either cultured in vitro up to blastocyst stage (Experiment I) or immediately after the cloning procedure were transferred into recipient-females (Experiment II). In Experiment I, 25/102 (24.5%) embryos formed blastocysts from whole embryos and 46/102 (44.12%) embryos developed to the blastocyst stage from single non-operated blastomeres, while the reconstructed blastomeres were damaged and degenerated. Thirteen (12.7%) embryos did not exceed 3- to 4-cell stages and 18 (17.7%) embryos were inhibited at the initial two-cell stage. Out of 14 blastocysts which were subjected to molecular analysis, the transgene was detected in the cells of 4 blastocysts. In Experiment II, 163/217 (75.0%) embryos were transferred into 9 pseudopregnant recipient-rabbits (an average of 18 embryos per recipient). Four recipientfemales (44.4%) became pregnant and delivered a total of 24 (14.7%) pups. Molecular analysis confirmed that two pups (1.2%), one live and one stillborn, showed a positive transgene signal. Live transgenic rabbit NT20 appeared healthy and anatomically as well as physiologically normal. The results of our experiments showed that the transgenic adult skin fibroblast cell nuclei, which have been introduced into the cytoplasmic microenvironment of single enucleated blastomeres from two-cell stage rabbit embryo, are able to direct the development of chimeric embryos not only to the blastocyst stage but also up to term.

Key words: Embryo • Assisted Reproductive Technology • Developmental biology • Early development


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P. Greda, J. Karasiewicz, and J. A Modlinski
Mouse zygotes as recipients in embryo cloning.
Reproduction, November 1, 2006; 132(5): 741 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.