Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print May 23, 2007.
Biol Reprod 2007, 10.1095/biolreprod.106.058172
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
77/3/384    most recent
biolreprod.106.058172v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berg, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Oback, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berg, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Oback, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Berg, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Oback, B.
Submitted November 1, 2006
Returned for revision November 27, 2006
Accepted December 26, 2006

Reproductive Technology


Red Deer Cloned from Antler Stem Cells and Their Differentiated Progeny

Debra K. Berg , Chunyi Li , Geoff Asher , David N. Wells , and Bjorn Oback *

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bjorn.oback{at}agresearch.co.nz.

Abstract
The significance of donor cell differentiation status for successful cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is unclear. Here we cloned a new species, red deer (Cervus elaphus), from multipotent antler stem cells and their differentiated progeny. Cultured donor cell lines from male antlerogenic periosteum (AP) were left undifferentiated or chemically induced to initiate osteogenesis or adipogenesis. Based on their morphology and marker gene expression profile, donor cells were classified as undifferentiated AP cells, presumptive osteoblasts or adipocytes. Adipocytes up-regulated adipogenic markers procollagen type I alpha2 (COL1A2), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma2 (PPARG) and gylceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and down-regulated antlerogenic transcripts POU-domain class 5 transcription factor (POU5F1) and parathyroid hormone (PTH)-like hormone (PTHLH). Despite differences prior to NT, transcript abundance of donor specific markers COL1A2, PPARG, GAPDH and POU5F1 did not differ significantly in cloned blastocysts (P = 0.10, 0.50, 0.61 and 0.16, respectively). However, donor cell and blastocyst expression levels were completely different for most genes analyzed, indicating their successful reprogramming. The type of donor cell used for NT (AP, bone and fat cells), had no effect on in vitro development to blastocysts (93/248 = 38% vs. 32/73 = 44% vs. 59/183 = 32%, respectively). Likewise, development to weaning was not significantly different between the three cell types (2/46 = 4% vs. 2/7 = 29% vs. 4/31 = 13%, for AP vs. bone vs. fat, respectively). Microsatellite DNA analysis confirmed that the eight cloned red deer calves were genetically identical to the cells used for NT.

Key words: Embryo • Assisted Reproductive Technology • Pregnancy • Developmental biology • Early development





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.