Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print April 11, 2007.
Biol Reprod 2007, 10.1095/biolreprod.106.058842
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
77/2/252    most recent
biolreprod.106.058842v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, D. M.W.
Right arrow Articles by Rawlings, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, D. M.W.
Right arrow Articles by Rawlings, N. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, D. M.W.
Right arrow Articles by Rawlings, N. C.
Submitted November 9, 2006
Returned for revision December 12, 2006
Accepted March 13, 2007

Ovary


Differential Effects of Various Estradiol-17beta Treatments on Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Peaks, Luteinizing Hormone Pulses, Basal Gonadotropin Concentrations, and Antral Follicle and Luteal Development in Cyclic Ewes

David M.W. Barrett , Rajesha Duggavathi , Kate L. Davies , Pawel M. Bartlewski , Edward T. Bagu , and Norman C. Rawlings *

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: norman.rawlings{at}usask.ca.

Abstract
In a previous study, 10-day estradiol implant treatment truncated FSH peaks that precede follicular waves in sheep, but subsequent ovine FSH (oFSH) injection reinitiated wave emergence. The present study's objectives were to examine the effects of a 20-day estradiol and progesterone treatment on FSH peaks, follicle waves, and responsiveness to oFSH injection. Also, different estradiol doses were given to see if a model could be produced that differentially suppressed FSH peaks, LH pulses, or basal gonadotropin secretion, to study effects of these changes on follicular dynamics. Mean estradiol concentrations were 11.8±0.4 pg/mL, FSH peaks were truncated, wave emergence was halted, and number of small follicles (2-3mm diameters) was reduced (P<0.05) in cyclic ewes given estradiol and progesterone implants (Experiment 1). On Day 15 of treatment, oFSH injection failed to induce wave emergence. With three different estradiol implant sizes (Experiment 2), estradiol concentrations were 5.2, 19.0, 27.5, and 34.8 (±4.6) pg/mL in control and treated ewes, respectively. All estradiol treatments truncated FSH peaks, except that which created the highest estradiol concentrations. Experiment 2 treated ewes had significantly reduced mean and basal FSH concentrations and LH pulse amplitude and frequency. We concluded that 20-day estradiol treatment truncated FSH peaks, blocking wave emergence, and reduced the small follicle pool, rendering the ovary unresponsive to oFSH injection in terms of wave emergence. Varying the steroid treatment created differential FSH peak regulation compared to other gonadotropin secretory parameters; this provides a useful model for future studies of the endocrine regulation of ovine antral follicular dynamics.

Key words: Corpus luteum • Estradiol • Follicle-stimulating hormone • Follicular development • Luteinizing hormone





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.