Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 21, 2007.
Biol Reprod 2007, 10.1095/biolreprod.106.059881
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
76/6/1002    most recent
biolreprod.106.059881v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. A.
Submitted December 28, 2006
Returned for revision January 30, 2007
Accepted February 19, 2007

Reproductive Technology


Preservation of Ejaculated Mouse Spermatozoa from Fertile C57BL/6 and Infertile Hook1/Hook1 Mice Collected from the Uteri of Mated Females

Yasuhiro Yamauchi and Monika A. Ward *

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mward{at}hawaii.edu.

Abstract
Methods routinely used to preserve mouse spermatozoa require that the male be euthanized to recover spermatozoa from the epididymides. Here we obtained multiple samples of ejaculated spermatozoa from normal fertile C57BL/6 and infertile Hook1/Hook1 (formerly known as azh/azh) mutant males from uteri after mating, thus avoiding terminating the males. Ejaculated sperm were preserved by conventional cryopreservation or by rapid freezing without cryoprotection, and injected into the oocytes by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The proportions of oocytes that survived, became activated, and developed into two-cell embryos were similar when comparing two preservation methods, wild-type vs. Hook1/Hook1 mice, and tested mice vs. controls (fresh and rapid frozen epididymal and fresh ejaculated sperm). Two-cell embryos were transferred into the oviducts of pseudo-pregnant females and fetal development was examined at Day 15 of gestation. Thirty nine to 54% of transferred embryos produced with preserved ejaculated sperm implanted. Live, normal fetuses (11-17%) were obtained in all examined groups and from all males included in the study. More implants (71- 82%) and fetuses (28-31%) were noted in controls. Lower developmental potentials of embryos produced with preserved ejaculated sperm might be due to their capacitation status; the majority of sperm retrieved from the uterus were capacitated. This study bears significance for the maintenance and distribution of novel mouse strains. The method is applicable for all types of mice, including those with male infertility syndromes. The sole requirement is that the male of interest is able to copulate and its ejaculate contains spermatozoa.

Key words: Embryo • Gamete Biology • Assisted Reproductive Technology • In vitro fertilization • Sperm


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Yamauchi, A. Ajduk, J. M Riel, and M. A Ward
Ejaculated and Epididymal Mouse Spermatozoa Are Different in Their Susceptibility to Nuclease-Dependent DNA Damage and in Their Nuclease Activity
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2007; 77(4): 636 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.