|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract
In polytocous animals, blastocysts are evenly distributed along each uterine horn and implant. The molecular mechanisms underlying these precise events remain elusive. We recently showed that lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) has critical roles in the establishment of early pregnancy by affecting embryo spacing and subsequent implantation through its receptor, LPA3. Targeted deletion of Lpa3 in mice resulted in delayed implantation and embryo crowding, which is associated with dramatic decrease in the prostaglandins and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 expression levels. Exogenous administration of prostaglandins rescued the delayed implantation but did not rescue the defects in embryo spacing, suggesting the role of prostaglandins in implantation downstream of LPA3 signaling. In this study, to know how LPA3 signaling regulates the embryo spacing, we determined the time course distribution of blastocysts during the preimplantation period. In WT uteri, blastocysts were distributed evenly along the uterine horns at E3.8, while in the Lpa3-deficient uteri they were clustered in the vicinity of the cervix, suggesting that the mislocalization and the resulting crowding of the embryos is the cause of the delayed implantation. However, embryos transferred singly into E2.5 pseudo-pregnant Lpa3-deficient uterine horn still showed delayed implantation but on-time implantation in WT uteri, indicating that embryo spacing and implantation timing are two segregated events. We also found that an LPA3-specific agonist induced rapid uterine contraction in WT mice but not in Lpa3-deficient mice. Because the uterine contraction is critical for embryo spacing, our results suggest that LPA3 signaling controls embryo spacing via uterine contraction around E3.5.
Key words:
Female Reproductive Tract
Growth factors
Implantation
Signal transduction
Uterus
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Ye Lysophospholipid signaling in the function and pathology of the reproductive system Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2008; 14(5): 519 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |