Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print July 11, 2007.
Biol Reprod 2007, 10.1095/biolreprod.107.061804
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
77/4/681    most recent
biolreprod.107.061804v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xue, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Bulun, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xue, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Bulun, S. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Xue, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Bulun, S. E.
Submitted March 26, 2007
Returned for revision April 9, 2007
Accepted July 9, 2007

Female Reproductive Tract


Promoter Methylation Regulates Estrogen Receptor 2 in Endometrium and Endometriosis

Qing Xue , Zhihong Lin , You-Hong Cheng , Chiang-Ching Huang , Erica Marsh , Ping Yin , Magdy P. Milad , Edmond Confino , Scott Reierstad , Joy Innes , and Serdar E. Bulun *

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s-bulun{at}northwestern.edu.

Abstract
Steroid receptors in the stromal cells of endometrium and its disease counterpart tissue endometriosis play critical physiological roles. We found that mRNA and protein levels of estrogen receptor 2 (ESR2) were strikingly higher, whereas levels of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), total progesterone receptor (PGR), and progesterone receptor B (PGR B) were significantly lower in endometriotic vs. endometrial stromal cells. Because ESR2 displayed the most striking levels of differential expression between endometriotic and endometrial cells, and the mechanisms for this difference are unknown, we tested the hypothesis that alterations in DNA methylation is a mechanism responsible for severely increased ESR2 mRNA levels in endometriotic cells. We identified a CpG island occupying the promoter region (-197/+359) of the ESR2 gene. Bisulfite sequencing of this region showed significantly higher methylation in primary endometrial cells (n=8 subjects) vs. endometriotic cells (n=8 subjects). The demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine significantly increased ESR2 mRNA levels in endometrial cells. Mechanistically, we employed serial deletion mutants of the ESR2 promoter fused to the luciferase reporter gene and transiently transfected into both endometriotic and endometrial cells. We demonstrated that the critical region (-197/+372) that confers promoter activity also bears the CpG island, and the activity of the ESR2 promoter was strongly inactivated by in vitro methylation. Taken together, methylation of a CpG island at the ESR2 promoter region is a primary mechanism responsible for differential expression of ESR2 in endometriosis and endometrium. These findings may be applied to a number of areas ranging from diagnosis to the treatment of endometriosis.

Key words: Ovary • Estradiol receptor • Uterus • DNA methylation • endometriosis


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
H. Asada, Y. Yamagata, T. Taketani, A. Matsuoka, H. Tamura, N. Hattori, J. Ohgane, N. Hattori, K. Shiota, and N. Sugino
Potential link between estrogen receptor-{alpha} gene hypomethylation and uterine fibroid formation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 14(9): 539 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
O. Guzeloglu-Kayisli, G. Halis, S. Taskiran, U. A. Kayisli, and A. Arici
DNA-Binding Ability of NF-{kappa}B is Affected Differently by ER{alpha} and ER{beta} and Its Activation Results in Inhibition of Estrogen Responsiveness
Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 2008; 15(5): 493 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.